RAW, can you avoid Heat Metal via Polymorph?











up vote
11
down vote

favorite












A Wizard and a Knight clad in chainmail are happily walking through a forest. A wily Druid pops out of a tree and casts Heat Metal upon the Knight and he begins melting in his armor, screaming.



Rolling well on his Initiative, the Wizard decides to Polymorph the knight, who is very willing, to try and save him from a horrible, fiery death.



Heat Metal damages via physical contact:




Any creature in physical contact with the object takes 2d8 fire damage when you cast the spell.




Polymorph "melds" objects into the creature and common sense dictates that the object is gone. However, Polymorph is curiously worded:




The target's gear melds into the new form. The creature can't activate, use, wield, or otherwise benefit from any of its equipment.




Emphasis mine. Clearly, the description is saying that the user pretty much cannot use the object or be given any benefit, like a magic item. But can the object still be a detriment? After all, it still satisfies Heat Metal's requirement of being physically attached to the creature, and it is clearly not providing any benefit.



However, I can also understand the viewpoint that "the object" may not necessarily be an object anymore - it's part of the new creature. I do find it curious, though, that the stipulation of the creature not being able to benefit from or use the object is written in, rather than saying it simply doesn't exist for the duration.



Is the Knight still afflicted by Heat Metal while under Polymorph? Can the Druid still recast Heat Metal while the Knight is in his new form?










share|improve this question




























    up vote
    11
    down vote

    favorite












    A Wizard and a Knight clad in chainmail are happily walking through a forest. A wily Druid pops out of a tree and casts Heat Metal upon the Knight and he begins melting in his armor, screaming.



    Rolling well on his Initiative, the Wizard decides to Polymorph the knight, who is very willing, to try and save him from a horrible, fiery death.



    Heat Metal damages via physical contact:




    Any creature in physical contact with the object takes 2d8 fire damage when you cast the spell.




    Polymorph "melds" objects into the creature and common sense dictates that the object is gone. However, Polymorph is curiously worded:




    The target's gear melds into the new form. The creature can't activate, use, wield, or otherwise benefit from any of its equipment.




    Emphasis mine. Clearly, the description is saying that the user pretty much cannot use the object or be given any benefit, like a magic item. But can the object still be a detriment? After all, it still satisfies Heat Metal's requirement of being physically attached to the creature, and it is clearly not providing any benefit.



    However, I can also understand the viewpoint that "the object" may not necessarily be an object anymore - it's part of the new creature. I do find it curious, though, that the stipulation of the creature not being able to benefit from or use the object is written in, rather than saying it simply doesn't exist for the duration.



    Is the Knight still afflicted by Heat Metal while under Polymorph? Can the Druid still recast Heat Metal while the Knight is in his new form?










    share|improve this question


























      up vote
      11
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      11
      down vote

      favorite











      A Wizard and a Knight clad in chainmail are happily walking through a forest. A wily Druid pops out of a tree and casts Heat Metal upon the Knight and he begins melting in his armor, screaming.



      Rolling well on his Initiative, the Wizard decides to Polymorph the knight, who is very willing, to try and save him from a horrible, fiery death.



      Heat Metal damages via physical contact:




      Any creature in physical contact with the object takes 2d8 fire damage when you cast the spell.




      Polymorph "melds" objects into the creature and common sense dictates that the object is gone. However, Polymorph is curiously worded:




      The target's gear melds into the new form. The creature can't activate, use, wield, or otherwise benefit from any of its equipment.




      Emphasis mine. Clearly, the description is saying that the user pretty much cannot use the object or be given any benefit, like a magic item. But can the object still be a detriment? After all, it still satisfies Heat Metal's requirement of being physically attached to the creature, and it is clearly not providing any benefit.



      However, I can also understand the viewpoint that "the object" may not necessarily be an object anymore - it's part of the new creature. I do find it curious, though, that the stipulation of the creature not being able to benefit from or use the object is written in, rather than saying it simply doesn't exist for the duration.



      Is the Knight still afflicted by Heat Metal while under Polymorph? Can the Druid still recast Heat Metal while the Knight is in his new form?










      share|improve this question















      A Wizard and a Knight clad in chainmail are happily walking through a forest. A wily Druid pops out of a tree and casts Heat Metal upon the Knight and he begins melting in his armor, screaming.



      Rolling well on his Initiative, the Wizard decides to Polymorph the knight, who is very willing, to try and save him from a horrible, fiery death.



      Heat Metal damages via physical contact:




      Any creature in physical contact with the object takes 2d8 fire damage when you cast the spell.




      Polymorph "melds" objects into the creature and common sense dictates that the object is gone. However, Polymorph is curiously worded:




      The target's gear melds into the new form. The creature can't activate, use, wield, or otherwise benefit from any of its equipment.




      Emphasis mine. Clearly, the description is saying that the user pretty much cannot use the object or be given any benefit, like a magic item. But can the object still be a detriment? After all, it still satisfies Heat Metal's requirement of being physically attached to the creature, and it is clearly not providing any benefit.



      However, I can also understand the viewpoint that "the object" may not necessarily be an object anymore - it's part of the new creature. I do find it curious, though, that the stipulation of the creature not being able to benefit from or use the object is written in, rather than saying it simply doesn't exist for the duration.



      Is the Knight still afflicted by Heat Metal while under Polymorph? Can the Druid still recast Heat Metal while the Knight is in his new form?







      dnd-5e spells rules-as-written polymorph






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago









      Purple Monkey

      36.9k7148228




      36.9k7148228










      asked 2 days ago









      Nicbobo

      1,041427




      1,041427






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          14
          down vote



          accepted










          RAW, it is unclear, but everything indicates the Knight should be fine




          This spell transforms a creature with at least 1 hit point that you can see within range into a new form.



          The target's gear melds into the new form. The creature can't activate, use, wield, or otherwise benefit from any of its equipment.




          It is unclear what melds means here. It does say it melds, not it disappears into the astral plane or whatever, so you could argue the metal is somehow imbued into the body of the new creature. However...




          Choose a manufactured metal object, such as a metal weapon or a suit of heavy or medium metal armor, that you can see within range.




          Even if the metal is considered to be somehow magically imbued into the new creature, it certainly is not a manufactured metal object any more, it's just metal blended into fur or whatever. So, first thing: We can no longer target that object.



          If you already cast the spell, though, what happens? As you mentioned, if the metal is melded into the creature, you could interpret it as "being in physical contact", which is the only requisite for doing damage ("Any creature in physical contact with the object").



          Continuing the reading of the spell, it says




          If a creature is holding or wearing the object and takes the damage from it




          Again, the creature is not holding nor wearing the object. So even if the Knight took the damage, he would not need to make the saving throw. Which is kinda awkward and inconsistent.



          Thus, it is probably intended that the Knight is fine, but you could read that the metal being melded into the creature means it is still in physical contact with it.



          A caveat is that the melded metal might not even be considered an object any more, so the whole wording of Heat Metal doesn't make sense any more.





          Note: the question is tagged and asks for RAW, which is strictly interpreting as written. I'm just saying you can interpret it as still being in physical contact and thus still doing damage. I would never rule it this way, though.






          share|improve this answer

















          • 3




            There are tweets to the effect that if a valid target becomes an invalid target the spell affecting it ends.
            – Dale M
            2 days ago






          • 2




            @DaleM I was not aware of that (actually I thought it was the opposite - even if you can't target any more, if it was already cast it's still in place), but either way tweets can only give us RAI.
            – HellSaint
            yesterday




















          up vote
          3
          down vote













          I think the Knight is safe.



          Polymorph essentially causes the target to swap stat blocks with a beast:




          The target's statistics are replaced by the statistics of the chosen beast. It retains its alignment and personality.




          Since no armor is mentioned in the stat block of a beast, heat metal can have no effect. The final sentence you quote is to make clear that you can't have a claymore-wielding bunny rabbit in plate armor.






          share|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "122"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f135743%2fraw-can-you-avoid-heat-metal-via-polymorph%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            14
            down vote



            accepted










            RAW, it is unclear, but everything indicates the Knight should be fine




            This spell transforms a creature with at least 1 hit point that you can see within range into a new form.



            The target's gear melds into the new form. The creature can't activate, use, wield, or otherwise benefit from any of its equipment.




            It is unclear what melds means here. It does say it melds, not it disappears into the astral plane or whatever, so you could argue the metal is somehow imbued into the body of the new creature. However...




            Choose a manufactured metal object, such as a metal weapon or a suit of heavy or medium metal armor, that you can see within range.




            Even if the metal is considered to be somehow magically imbued into the new creature, it certainly is not a manufactured metal object any more, it's just metal blended into fur or whatever. So, first thing: We can no longer target that object.



            If you already cast the spell, though, what happens? As you mentioned, if the metal is melded into the creature, you could interpret it as "being in physical contact", which is the only requisite for doing damage ("Any creature in physical contact with the object").



            Continuing the reading of the spell, it says




            If a creature is holding or wearing the object and takes the damage from it




            Again, the creature is not holding nor wearing the object. So even if the Knight took the damage, he would not need to make the saving throw. Which is kinda awkward and inconsistent.



            Thus, it is probably intended that the Knight is fine, but you could read that the metal being melded into the creature means it is still in physical contact with it.



            A caveat is that the melded metal might not even be considered an object any more, so the whole wording of Heat Metal doesn't make sense any more.





            Note: the question is tagged and asks for RAW, which is strictly interpreting as written. I'm just saying you can interpret it as still being in physical contact and thus still doing damage. I would never rule it this way, though.






            share|improve this answer

















            • 3




              There are tweets to the effect that if a valid target becomes an invalid target the spell affecting it ends.
              – Dale M
              2 days ago






            • 2




              @DaleM I was not aware of that (actually I thought it was the opposite - even if you can't target any more, if it was already cast it's still in place), but either way tweets can only give us RAI.
              – HellSaint
              yesterday

















            up vote
            14
            down vote



            accepted










            RAW, it is unclear, but everything indicates the Knight should be fine




            This spell transforms a creature with at least 1 hit point that you can see within range into a new form.



            The target's gear melds into the new form. The creature can't activate, use, wield, or otherwise benefit from any of its equipment.




            It is unclear what melds means here. It does say it melds, not it disappears into the astral plane or whatever, so you could argue the metal is somehow imbued into the body of the new creature. However...




            Choose a manufactured metal object, such as a metal weapon or a suit of heavy or medium metal armor, that you can see within range.




            Even if the metal is considered to be somehow magically imbued into the new creature, it certainly is not a manufactured metal object any more, it's just metal blended into fur or whatever. So, first thing: We can no longer target that object.



            If you already cast the spell, though, what happens? As you mentioned, if the metal is melded into the creature, you could interpret it as "being in physical contact", which is the only requisite for doing damage ("Any creature in physical contact with the object").



            Continuing the reading of the spell, it says




            If a creature is holding or wearing the object and takes the damage from it




            Again, the creature is not holding nor wearing the object. So even if the Knight took the damage, he would not need to make the saving throw. Which is kinda awkward and inconsistent.



            Thus, it is probably intended that the Knight is fine, but you could read that the metal being melded into the creature means it is still in physical contact with it.



            A caveat is that the melded metal might not even be considered an object any more, so the whole wording of Heat Metal doesn't make sense any more.





            Note: the question is tagged and asks for RAW, which is strictly interpreting as written. I'm just saying you can interpret it as still being in physical contact and thus still doing damage. I would never rule it this way, though.






            share|improve this answer

















            • 3




              There are tweets to the effect that if a valid target becomes an invalid target the spell affecting it ends.
              – Dale M
              2 days ago






            • 2




              @DaleM I was not aware of that (actually I thought it was the opposite - even if you can't target any more, if it was already cast it's still in place), but either way tweets can only give us RAI.
              – HellSaint
              yesterday















            up vote
            14
            down vote



            accepted







            up vote
            14
            down vote



            accepted






            RAW, it is unclear, but everything indicates the Knight should be fine




            This spell transforms a creature with at least 1 hit point that you can see within range into a new form.



            The target's gear melds into the new form. The creature can't activate, use, wield, or otherwise benefit from any of its equipment.




            It is unclear what melds means here. It does say it melds, not it disappears into the astral plane or whatever, so you could argue the metal is somehow imbued into the body of the new creature. However...




            Choose a manufactured metal object, such as a metal weapon or a suit of heavy or medium metal armor, that you can see within range.




            Even if the metal is considered to be somehow magically imbued into the new creature, it certainly is not a manufactured metal object any more, it's just metal blended into fur or whatever. So, first thing: We can no longer target that object.



            If you already cast the spell, though, what happens? As you mentioned, if the metal is melded into the creature, you could interpret it as "being in physical contact", which is the only requisite for doing damage ("Any creature in physical contact with the object").



            Continuing the reading of the spell, it says




            If a creature is holding or wearing the object and takes the damage from it




            Again, the creature is not holding nor wearing the object. So even if the Knight took the damage, he would not need to make the saving throw. Which is kinda awkward and inconsistent.



            Thus, it is probably intended that the Knight is fine, but you could read that the metal being melded into the creature means it is still in physical contact with it.



            A caveat is that the melded metal might not even be considered an object any more, so the whole wording of Heat Metal doesn't make sense any more.





            Note: the question is tagged and asks for RAW, which is strictly interpreting as written. I'm just saying you can interpret it as still being in physical contact and thus still doing damage. I would never rule it this way, though.






            share|improve this answer












            RAW, it is unclear, but everything indicates the Knight should be fine




            This spell transforms a creature with at least 1 hit point that you can see within range into a new form.



            The target's gear melds into the new form. The creature can't activate, use, wield, or otherwise benefit from any of its equipment.




            It is unclear what melds means here. It does say it melds, not it disappears into the astral plane or whatever, so you could argue the metal is somehow imbued into the body of the new creature. However...




            Choose a manufactured metal object, such as a metal weapon or a suit of heavy or medium metal armor, that you can see within range.




            Even if the metal is considered to be somehow magically imbued into the new creature, it certainly is not a manufactured metal object any more, it's just metal blended into fur or whatever. So, first thing: We can no longer target that object.



            If you already cast the spell, though, what happens? As you mentioned, if the metal is melded into the creature, you could interpret it as "being in physical contact", which is the only requisite for doing damage ("Any creature in physical contact with the object").



            Continuing the reading of the spell, it says




            If a creature is holding or wearing the object and takes the damage from it




            Again, the creature is not holding nor wearing the object. So even if the Knight took the damage, he would not need to make the saving throw. Which is kinda awkward and inconsistent.



            Thus, it is probably intended that the Knight is fine, but you could read that the metal being melded into the creature means it is still in physical contact with it.



            A caveat is that the melded metal might not even be considered an object any more, so the whole wording of Heat Metal doesn't make sense any more.





            Note: the question is tagged and asks for RAW, which is strictly interpreting as written. I'm just saying you can interpret it as still being in physical contact and thus still doing damage. I would never rule it this way, though.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 2 days ago









            HellSaint

            19k675157




            19k675157








            • 3




              There are tweets to the effect that if a valid target becomes an invalid target the spell affecting it ends.
              – Dale M
              2 days ago






            • 2




              @DaleM I was not aware of that (actually I thought it was the opposite - even if you can't target any more, if it was already cast it's still in place), but either way tweets can only give us RAI.
              – HellSaint
              yesterday
















            • 3




              There are tweets to the effect that if a valid target becomes an invalid target the spell affecting it ends.
              – Dale M
              2 days ago






            • 2




              @DaleM I was not aware of that (actually I thought it was the opposite - even if you can't target any more, if it was already cast it's still in place), but either way tweets can only give us RAI.
              – HellSaint
              yesterday










            3




            3




            There are tweets to the effect that if a valid target becomes an invalid target the spell affecting it ends.
            – Dale M
            2 days ago




            There are tweets to the effect that if a valid target becomes an invalid target the spell affecting it ends.
            – Dale M
            2 days ago




            2




            2




            @DaleM I was not aware of that (actually I thought it was the opposite - even if you can't target any more, if it was already cast it's still in place), but either way tweets can only give us RAI.
            – HellSaint
            yesterday






            @DaleM I was not aware of that (actually I thought it was the opposite - even if you can't target any more, if it was already cast it's still in place), but either way tweets can only give us RAI.
            – HellSaint
            yesterday














            up vote
            3
            down vote













            I think the Knight is safe.



            Polymorph essentially causes the target to swap stat blocks with a beast:




            The target's statistics are replaced by the statistics of the chosen beast. It retains its alignment and personality.




            Since no armor is mentioned in the stat block of a beast, heat metal can have no effect. The final sentence you quote is to make clear that you can't have a claymore-wielding bunny rabbit in plate armor.






            share|improve this answer

























              up vote
              3
              down vote













              I think the Knight is safe.



              Polymorph essentially causes the target to swap stat blocks with a beast:




              The target's statistics are replaced by the statistics of the chosen beast. It retains its alignment and personality.




              Since no armor is mentioned in the stat block of a beast, heat metal can have no effect. The final sentence you quote is to make clear that you can't have a claymore-wielding bunny rabbit in plate armor.






              share|improve this answer























                up vote
                3
                down vote










                up vote
                3
                down vote









                I think the Knight is safe.



                Polymorph essentially causes the target to swap stat blocks with a beast:




                The target's statistics are replaced by the statistics of the chosen beast. It retains its alignment and personality.




                Since no armor is mentioned in the stat block of a beast, heat metal can have no effect. The final sentence you quote is to make clear that you can't have a claymore-wielding bunny rabbit in plate armor.






                share|improve this answer












                I think the Knight is safe.



                Polymorph essentially causes the target to swap stat blocks with a beast:




                The target's statistics are replaced by the statistics of the chosen beast. It retains its alignment and personality.




                Since no armor is mentioned in the stat block of a beast, heat metal can have no effect. The final sentence you quote is to make clear that you can't have a claymore-wielding bunny rabbit in plate armor.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 2 days ago









                rpeinhardt

                894110




                894110






























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded



















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f135743%2fraw-can-you-avoid-heat-metal-via-polymorph%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Create new schema in PostgreSQL using DBeaver

                    Deepest pit of an array with Javascript: test on Codility

                    Costa Masnaga