Custom property delegation for arrays using a map












1














Consider I'm trying to implement delegation by storing properties in a Map instance, and one of the properties delegated is an array:



class Foo private constructor(map: Map<String, Any?>) {
constructor(value: Array<Byte>) : this(mapOf(Foo::value.name to value))

val value: Array<Byte> by map
}

object PropertyDelegationTest {
@JvmStatic
fun main(vararg args: String) {
val foo = Foo(arrayOf(42.toByte(), 127.toByte()))
println(foo.value[0]) // 42
println(foo.value[1]) // 127
}
}


The above compiles just fine and works as expected.



Now consider I want to enhance my property delegation mechanism by implementing a custom Map.getValue(thisRef: Any?, property: KProperty<*>) extension method (overriding the default extension):



import kotlin.reflect.KProperty
import kotlin.reflect.full.isSubtypeOf
import kotlin.reflect.full.starProjectedType
import kotlin.reflect.jvm.jvmName

// ...

operator fun <V, V1 : V> Map<in String, V>.getValue(thisRef: Any?, property: KProperty<*>): V1 {
val value = this[property.name]
?: throw NoSuchElementException("Key ${property.name} is missing in the map.")
val clazz = (value as Any)::class
@Suppress("UNCHECKED_CAST")
return when {
clazz.starProjectedType.isSubtypeOf(property.returnType) -> value as V1
else -> throw ClassCastException("${clazz.starProjectedType} (${clazz.jvmName}) cannot be cast to ${property.returnType}")
}
}


This fails at run time:



Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassCastException: kotlin.Array<*> ([Ljava.lang.Byte;) cannot be cast to kotlin.Array<kotlin.Byte>
at com.example.PropertyDelegationTestKt.getValue(PropertyDelegationTest.kt:30)
at com.example.Foo.getValue(PropertyDelegationTest.kt)
at com.example.PropertyDelegationTest.main(PropertyDelegationTest.kt:18)


Despite the effective JVM type is known ([Ljava.lang.Byte;), Kotlin-specific run time type of the value is Array<*> while Array<Byte> is required. Consistently, clazz.typeParameters[0].upperBounds[0] evaluates to kotlin.Any?, not kotlin.Byte?.



How do I implement my custom type checking which would also work correctly for arrays? Kotlin version is 1.2.71.










share|improve this question


















  • 1




    Could you remove the explicit type check and instead do a safe cast to V1 and if that fails then throw the exception? e.g. return value as? V1 ?: throw ClassCastException(... ?
    – Yoni Gibbs
    Nov 20 at 11:20










  • @YoniGibbs This way it works, thanks a lot! Could you convert your comment to an answer so I can up-vote it?
    – Bass
    Nov 21 at 8:03
















1














Consider I'm trying to implement delegation by storing properties in a Map instance, and one of the properties delegated is an array:



class Foo private constructor(map: Map<String, Any?>) {
constructor(value: Array<Byte>) : this(mapOf(Foo::value.name to value))

val value: Array<Byte> by map
}

object PropertyDelegationTest {
@JvmStatic
fun main(vararg args: String) {
val foo = Foo(arrayOf(42.toByte(), 127.toByte()))
println(foo.value[0]) // 42
println(foo.value[1]) // 127
}
}


The above compiles just fine and works as expected.



Now consider I want to enhance my property delegation mechanism by implementing a custom Map.getValue(thisRef: Any?, property: KProperty<*>) extension method (overriding the default extension):



import kotlin.reflect.KProperty
import kotlin.reflect.full.isSubtypeOf
import kotlin.reflect.full.starProjectedType
import kotlin.reflect.jvm.jvmName

// ...

operator fun <V, V1 : V> Map<in String, V>.getValue(thisRef: Any?, property: KProperty<*>): V1 {
val value = this[property.name]
?: throw NoSuchElementException("Key ${property.name} is missing in the map.")
val clazz = (value as Any)::class
@Suppress("UNCHECKED_CAST")
return when {
clazz.starProjectedType.isSubtypeOf(property.returnType) -> value as V1
else -> throw ClassCastException("${clazz.starProjectedType} (${clazz.jvmName}) cannot be cast to ${property.returnType}")
}
}


This fails at run time:



Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassCastException: kotlin.Array<*> ([Ljava.lang.Byte;) cannot be cast to kotlin.Array<kotlin.Byte>
at com.example.PropertyDelegationTestKt.getValue(PropertyDelegationTest.kt:30)
at com.example.Foo.getValue(PropertyDelegationTest.kt)
at com.example.PropertyDelegationTest.main(PropertyDelegationTest.kt:18)


Despite the effective JVM type is known ([Ljava.lang.Byte;), Kotlin-specific run time type of the value is Array<*> while Array<Byte> is required. Consistently, clazz.typeParameters[0].upperBounds[0] evaluates to kotlin.Any?, not kotlin.Byte?.



How do I implement my custom type checking which would also work correctly for arrays? Kotlin version is 1.2.71.










share|improve this question


















  • 1




    Could you remove the explicit type check and instead do a safe cast to V1 and if that fails then throw the exception? e.g. return value as? V1 ?: throw ClassCastException(... ?
    – Yoni Gibbs
    Nov 20 at 11:20










  • @YoniGibbs This way it works, thanks a lot! Could you convert your comment to an answer so I can up-vote it?
    – Bass
    Nov 21 at 8:03














1












1








1







Consider I'm trying to implement delegation by storing properties in a Map instance, and one of the properties delegated is an array:



class Foo private constructor(map: Map<String, Any?>) {
constructor(value: Array<Byte>) : this(mapOf(Foo::value.name to value))

val value: Array<Byte> by map
}

object PropertyDelegationTest {
@JvmStatic
fun main(vararg args: String) {
val foo = Foo(arrayOf(42.toByte(), 127.toByte()))
println(foo.value[0]) // 42
println(foo.value[1]) // 127
}
}


The above compiles just fine and works as expected.



Now consider I want to enhance my property delegation mechanism by implementing a custom Map.getValue(thisRef: Any?, property: KProperty<*>) extension method (overriding the default extension):



import kotlin.reflect.KProperty
import kotlin.reflect.full.isSubtypeOf
import kotlin.reflect.full.starProjectedType
import kotlin.reflect.jvm.jvmName

// ...

operator fun <V, V1 : V> Map<in String, V>.getValue(thisRef: Any?, property: KProperty<*>): V1 {
val value = this[property.name]
?: throw NoSuchElementException("Key ${property.name} is missing in the map.")
val clazz = (value as Any)::class
@Suppress("UNCHECKED_CAST")
return when {
clazz.starProjectedType.isSubtypeOf(property.returnType) -> value as V1
else -> throw ClassCastException("${clazz.starProjectedType} (${clazz.jvmName}) cannot be cast to ${property.returnType}")
}
}


This fails at run time:



Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassCastException: kotlin.Array<*> ([Ljava.lang.Byte;) cannot be cast to kotlin.Array<kotlin.Byte>
at com.example.PropertyDelegationTestKt.getValue(PropertyDelegationTest.kt:30)
at com.example.Foo.getValue(PropertyDelegationTest.kt)
at com.example.PropertyDelegationTest.main(PropertyDelegationTest.kt:18)


Despite the effective JVM type is known ([Ljava.lang.Byte;), Kotlin-specific run time type of the value is Array<*> while Array<Byte> is required. Consistently, clazz.typeParameters[0].upperBounds[0] evaluates to kotlin.Any?, not kotlin.Byte?.



How do I implement my custom type checking which would also work correctly for arrays? Kotlin version is 1.2.71.










share|improve this question













Consider I'm trying to implement delegation by storing properties in a Map instance, and one of the properties delegated is an array:



class Foo private constructor(map: Map<String, Any?>) {
constructor(value: Array<Byte>) : this(mapOf(Foo::value.name to value))

val value: Array<Byte> by map
}

object PropertyDelegationTest {
@JvmStatic
fun main(vararg args: String) {
val foo = Foo(arrayOf(42.toByte(), 127.toByte()))
println(foo.value[0]) // 42
println(foo.value[1]) // 127
}
}


The above compiles just fine and works as expected.



Now consider I want to enhance my property delegation mechanism by implementing a custom Map.getValue(thisRef: Any?, property: KProperty<*>) extension method (overriding the default extension):



import kotlin.reflect.KProperty
import kotlin.reflect.full.isSubtypeOf
import kotlin.reflect.full.starProjectedType
import kotlin.reflect.jvm.jvmName

// ...

operator fun <V, V1 : V> Map<in String, V>.getValue(thisRef: Any?, property: KProperty<*>): V1 {
val value = this[property.name]
?: throw NoSuchElementException("Key ${property.name} is missing in the map.")
val clazz = (value as Any)::class
@Suppress("UNCHECKED_CAST")
return when {
clazz.starProjectedType.isSubtypeOf(property.returnType) -> value as V1
else -> throw ClassCastException("${clazz.starProjectedType} (${clazz.jvmName}) cannot be cast to ${property.returnType}")
}
}


This fails at run time:



Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ClassCastException: kotlin.Array<*> ([Ljava.lang.Byte;) cannot be cast to kotlin.Array<kotlin.Byte>
at com.example.PropertyDelegationTestKt.getValue(PropertyDelegationTest.kt:30)
at com.example.Foo.getValue(PropertyDelegationTest.kt)
at com.example.PropertyDelegationTest.main(PropertyDelegationTest.kt:18)


Despite the effective JVM type is known ([Ljava.lang.Byte;), Kotlin-specific run time type of the value is Array<*> while Array<Byte> is required. Consistently, clazz.typeParameters[0].upperBounds[0] evaluates to kotlin.Any?, not kotlin.Byte?.



How do I implement my custom type checking which would also work correctly for arrays? Kotlin version is 1.2.71.







arrays kotlin






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 20 at 9:50









Bass

1,67721646




1,67721646








  • 1




    Could you remove the explicit type check and instead do a safe cast to V1 and if that fails then throw the exception? e.g. return value as? V1 ?: throw ClassCastException(... ?
    – Yoni Gibbs
    Nov 20 at 11:20










  • @YoniGibbs This way it works, thanks a lot! Could you convert your comment to an answer so I can up-vote it?
    – Bass
    Nov 21 at 8:03














  • 1




    Could you remove the explicit type check and instead do a safe cast to V1 and if that fails then throw the exception? e.g. return value as? V1 ?: throw ClassCastException(... ?
    – Yoni Gibbs
    Nov 20 at 11:20










  • @YoniGibbs This way it works, thanks a lot! Could you convert your comment to an answer so I can up-vote it?
    – Bass
    Nov 21 at 8:03








1




1




Could you remove the explicit type check and instead do a safe cast to V1 and if that fails then throw the exception? e.g. return value as? V1 ?: throw ClassCastException(... ?
– Yoni Gibbs
Nov 20 at 11:20




Could you remove the explicit type check and instead do a safe cast to V1 and if that fails then throw the exception? e.g. return value as? V1 ?: throw ClassCastException(... ?
– Yoni Gibbs
Nov 20 at 11:20












@YoniGibbs This way it works, thanks a lot! Could you convert your comment to an answer so I can up-vote it?
– Bass
Nov 21 at 8:03




@YoniGibbs This way it works, thanks a lot! Could you convert your comment to an answer so I can up-vote it?
– Bass
Nov 21 at 8:03












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














You could remove the explicit type check and instead do a safe cast to V1 and if that fails then throw the exception, e.g.



return value as? V1 ?: throw ClassCastException(... 





share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53390285%2fcustom-property-delegation-for-arrays-using-a-map%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    You could remove the explicit type check and instead do a safe cast to V1 and if that fails then throw the exception, e.g.



    return value as? V1 ?: throw ClassCastException(... 





    share|improve this answer


























      1














      You could remove the explicit type check and instead do a safe cast to V1 and if that fails then throw the exception, e.g.



      return value as? V1 ?: throw ClassCastException(... 





      share|improve this answer
























        1












        1








        1






        You could remove the explicit type check and instead do a safe cast to V1 and if that fails then throw the exception, e.g.



        return value as? V1 ?: throw ClassCastException(... 





        share|improve this answer












        You could remove the explicit type check and instead do a safe cast to V1 and if that fails then throw the exception, e.g.



        return value as? V1 ?: throw ClassCastException(... 






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 21 at 8:06









        Yoni Gibbs

        953113




        953113






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53390285%2fcustom-property-delegation-for-arrays-using-a-map%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Create new schema in PostgreSQL using DBeaver

            Deepest pit of an array with Javascript: test on Codility

            Fotorealismo