java.lang.UnsupportedOperationExceptionfieldIndex on a Row without schema is undefined: Exception on...












2














The following code is throwing an Exception Caused by: java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: fieldIndex on a Row without schema is undefined. This is happening when a on a dataframe that has been returned after a groupByKey and flatMap invocation on a dataframe using ExpressionEncoder, groupedByKey and a flatMap is invoked.



Logical flow:
originalDf->groupByKey->flatMap->groupByKey->flatMap->show



   import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.encoders.RowEncoder
import org.apache.spark.sql.{Row, SparkSession}
import org.apache.spark.sql.types.{ IntegerType, StructField, StructType}

import scala.collection.mutable.ListBuffer



object Test {

def main(args: Array[String]): Unit = {

val values = List(List("1", "One") ,List("1", "Two") ,List("2", "Three"),List("2","4")).map(x =>(x(0), x(1)))
val session = SparkSession.builder.config("spark.master", "local").getOrCreate
import session.implicits._
val dataFrame = values.toDF


dataFrame.show()
dataFrame.printSchema()

val newSchema = StructType(dataFrame.schema.fields
++ Array(
StructField("Count", IntegerType, false)
)
)

val expr = RowEncoder.apply(newSchema)

val tranform = dataFrame.groupByKey(row => row.getAs[String]("_1")).flatMapGroups((key, inputItr) => {
val inputSeq = inputItr.toSeq

val length = inputSeq.size
var listBuff = new ListBuffer[Row]()
var counter : Int= 0
for(i <- 0 until(length))
{
counter+=1

}

for(i <- 0 until length ) {
var x = inputSeq(i)
listBuff += Row.fromSeq(x.toSeq ++ Array[Int](counter))
}
listBuff.iterator
})(expr)

tranform.show

val newSchema1 = StructType(tranform.schema.fields
++ Array(
StructField("Count1", IntegerType, false)
)
)
val expr1 = RowEncoder.apply(newSchema1)
val tranform2 = tranform.groupByKey(row => row.getAs[String]("_1")).flatMapGroups((key, inputItr) => {
val inputSeq = inputItr.toSeq

val length = inputSeq.size
var listBuff = new ListBuffer[Row]()
var counter : Int= 0
for(i <- 0 until(length))
{
counter+=1

}

for(i <- 0 until length ) {
var x = inputSeq(i)
listBuff += Row.fromSeq(x.toSeq ++ Array[Int](counter))
}
listBuff.iterator
})(expr1)

tranform2.show
}
}


Following is the stacktrace



18/11/21 19:39:03 WARN TaskSetManager: Lost task 144.0 in stage 11.0 (TID 400, localhost, executor driver): java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: fieldIndex on a Row without schema is undefined.
at org.apache.spark.sql.Row$class.fieldIndex(Row.scala:342)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GenericRow.fieldIndex(rows.scala:166)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Row$class.getAs(Row.scala:333)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GenericRow.getAs(rows.scala:166)
at com.quantuting.sparkutils.main.Test$$anonfun$4.apply(Test.scala:59)
at com.quantuting.sparkutils.main.Test$$anonfun$4.apply(Test.scala:59)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.AppendColumnsWithObjectExec$$anonfun$9$$anonfun$apply$3.apply(objects.scala:300)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.AppendColumnsWithObjectExec$$anonfun$9$$anonfun$apply$3.apply(objects.scala:298)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.next(Iterator.scala:409)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.next(Iterator.scala:409)
at org.apache.spark.shuffle.sort.BypassMergeSortShuffleWriter.write(BypassMergeSortShuffleWriter.java:149)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:96)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:53)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:109)
at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:345)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)


How to fix this code?










share|improve this question

















This question has an open bounty worth +50
reputation from Bay Max ending tomorrow.


Looking for an answer drawing from credible and/or official sources.


I have been struggling to get around this issue for a while now, would appreciate if someone from Spark community can address this question.












  • 1




    @user6910411: added the stacktrace. Will be difficult to put the reproducible code, as the flow is integrated in a framework over multiple libraries. But can answer whatever details would be required
    – Bay Max
    Nov 20 at 16:28










  • Can you post the case class definitions for the two datasets? Did you add the naturalRank field to the second?
    – sramalingam24
    Nov 20 at 18:37










  • Also you can just do row => row.ticker if the schema is specified correctly
    – sramalingam24
    Nov 20 at 19:23
















2














The following code is throwing an Exception Caused by: java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: fieldIndex on a Row without schema is undefined. This is happening when a on a dataframe that has been returned after a groupByKey and flatMap invocation on a dataframe using ExpressionEncoder, groupedByKey and a flatMap is invoked.



Logical flow:
originalDf->groupByKey->flatMap->groupByKey->flatMap->show



   import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.encoders.RowEncoder
import org.apache.spark.sql.{Row, SparkSession}
import org.apache.spark.sql.types.{ IntegerType, StructField, StructType}

import scala.collection.mutable.ListBuffer



object Test {

def main(args: Array[String]): Unit = {

val values = List(List("1", "One") ,List("1", "Two") ,List("2", "Three"),List("2","4")).map(x =>(x(0), x(1)))
val session = SparkSession.builder.config("spark.master", "local").getOrCreate
import session.implicits._
val dataFrame = values.toDF


dataFrame.show()
dataFrame.printSchema()

val newSchema = StructType(dataFrame.schema.fields
++ Array(
StructField("Count", IntegerType, false)
)
)

val expr = RowEncoder.apply(newSchema)

val tranform = dataFrame.groupByKey(row => row.getAs[String]("_1")).flatMapGroups((key, inputItr) => {
val inputSeq = inputItr.toSeq

val length = inputSeq.size
var listBuff = new ListBuffer[Row]()
var counter : Int= 0
for(i <- 0 until(length))
{
counter+=1

}

for(i <- 0 until length ) {
var x = inputSeq(i)
listBuff += Row.fromSeq(x.toSeq ++ Array[Int](counter))
}
listBuff.iterator
})(expr)

tranform.show

val newSchema1 = StructType(tranform.schema.fields
++ Array(
StructField("Count1", IntegerType, false)
)
)
val expr1 = RowEncoder.apply(newSchema1)
val tranform2 = tranform.groupByKey(row => row.getAs[String]("_1")).flatMapGroups((key, inputItr) => {
val inputSeq = inputItr.toSeq

val length = inputSeq.size
var listBuff = new ListBuffer[Row]()
var counter : Int= 0
for(i <- 0 until(length))
{
counter+=1

}

for(i <- 0 until length ) {
var x = inputSeq(i)
listBuff += Row.fromSeq(x.toSeq ++ Array[Int](counter))
}
listBuff.iterator
})(expr1)

tranform2.show
}
}


Following is the stacktrace



18/11/21 19:39:03 WARN TaskSetManager: Lost task 144.0 in stage 11.0 (TID 400, localhost, executor driver): java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: fieldIndex on a Row without schema is undefined.
at org.apache.spark.sql.Row$class.fieldIndex(Row.scala:342)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GenericRow.fieldIndex(rows.scala:166)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Row$class.getAs(Row.scala:333)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GenericRow.getAs(rows.scala:166)
at com.quantuting.sparkutils.main.Test$$anonfun$4.apply(Test.scala:59)
at com.quantuting.sparkutils.main.Test$$anonfun$4.apply(Test.scala:59)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.AppendColumnsWithObjectExec$$anonfun$9$$anonfun$apply$3.apply(objects.scala:300)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.AppendColumnsWithObjectExec$$anonfun$9$$anonfun$apply$3.apply(objects.scala:298)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.next(Iterator.scala:409)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.next(Iterator.scala:409)
at org.apache.spark.shuffle.sort.BypassMergeSortShuffleWriter.write(BypassMergeSortShuffleWriter.java:149)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:96)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:53)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:109)
at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:345)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)


How to fix this code?










share|improve this question

















This question has an open bounty worth +50
reputation from Bay Max ending tomorrow.


Looking for an answer drawing from credible and/or official sources.


I have been struggling to get around this issue for a while now, would appreciate if someone from Spark community can address this question.












  • 1




    @user6910411: added the stacktrace. Will be difficult to put the reproducible code, as the flow is integrated in a framework over multiple libraries. But can answer whatever details would be required
    – Bay Max
    Nov 20 at 16:28










  • Can you post the case class definitions for the two datasets? Did you add the naturalRank field to the second?
    – sramalingam24
    Nov 20 at 18:37










  • Also you can just do row => row.ticker if the schema is specified correctly
    – sramalingam24
    Nov 20 at 19:23














2












2








2







The following code is throwing an Exception Caused by: java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: fieldIndex on a Row without schema is undefined. This is happening when a on a dataframe that has been returned after a groupByKey and flatMap invocation on a dataframe using ExpressionEncoder, groupedByKey and a flatMap is invoked.



Logical flow:
originalDf->groupByKey->flatMap->groupByKey->flatMap->show



   import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.encoders.RowEncoder
import org.apache.spark.sql.{Row, SparkSession}
import org.apache.spark.sql.types.{ IntegerType, StructField, StructType}

import scala.collection.mutable.ListBuffer



object Test {

def main(args: Array[String]): Unit = {

val values = List(List("1", "One") ,List("1", "Two") ,List("2", "Three"),List("2","4")).map(x =>(x(0), x(1)))
val session = SparkSession.builder.config("spark.master", "local").getOrCreate
import session.implicits._
val dataFrame = values.toDF


dataFrame.show()
dataFrame.printSchema()

val newSchema = StructType(dataFrame.schema.fields
++ Array(
StructField("Count", IntegerType, false)
)
)

val expr = RowEncoder.apply(newSchema)

val tranform = dataFrame.groupByKey(row => row.getAs[String]("_1")).flatMapGroups((key, inputItr) => {
val inputSeq = inputItr.toSeq

val length = inputSeq.size
var listBuff = new ListBuffer[Row]()
var counter : Int= 0
for(i <- 0 until(length))
{
counter+=1

}

for(i <- 0 until length ) {
var x = inputSeq(i)
listBuff += Row.fromSeq(x.toSeq ++ Array[Int](counter))
}
listBuff.iterator
})(expr)

tranform.show

val newSchema1 = StructType(tranform.schema.fields
++ Array(
StructField("Count1", IntegerType, false)
)
)
val expr1 = RowEncoder.apply(newSchema1)
val tranform2 = tranform.groupByKey(row => row.getAs[String]("_1")).flatMapGroups((key, inputItr) => {
val inputSeq = inputItr.toSeq

val length = inputSeq.size
var listBuff = new ListBuffer[Row]()
var counter : Int= 0
for(i <- 0 until(length))
{
counter+=1

}

for(i <- 0 until length ) {
var x = inputSeq(i)
listBuff += Row.fromSeq(x.toSeq ++ Array[Int](counter))
}
listBuff.iterator
})(expr1)

tranform2.show
}
}


Following is the stacktrace



18/11/21 19:39:03 WARN TaskSetManager: Lost task 144.0 in stage 11.0 (TID 400, localhost, executor driver): java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: fieldIndex on a Row without schema is undefined.
at org.apache.spark.sql.Row$class.fieldIndex(Row.scala:342)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GenericRow.fieldIndex(rows.scala:166)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Row$class.getAs(Row.scala:333)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GenericRow.getAs(rows.scala:166)
at com.quantuting.sparkutils.main.Test$$anonfun$4.apply(Test.scala:59)
at com.quantuting.sparkutils.main.Test$$anonfun$4.apply(Test.scala:59)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.AppendColumnsWithObjectExec$$anonfun$9$$anonfun$apply$3.apply(objects.scala:300)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.AppendColumnsWithObjectExec$$anonfun$9$$anonfun$apply$3.apply(objects.scala:298)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.next(Iterator.scala:409)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.next(Iterator.scala:409)
at org.apache.spark.shuffle.sort.BypassMergeSortShuffleWriter.write(BypassMergeSortShuffleWriter.java:149)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:96)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:53)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:109)
at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:345)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)


How to fix this code?










share|improve this question















The following code is throwing an Exception Caused by: java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: fieldIndex on a Row without schema is undefined. This is happening when a on a dataframe that has been returned after a groupByKey and flatMap invocation on a dataframe using ExpressionEncoder, groupedByKey and a flatMap is invoked.



Logical flow:
originalDf->groupByKey->flatMap->groupByKey->flatMap->show



   import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.encoders.RowEncoder
import org.apache.spark.sql.{Row, SparkSession}
import org.apache.spark.sql.types.{ IntegerType, StructField, StructType}

import scala.collection.mutable.ListBuffer



object Test {

def main(args: Array[String]): Unit = {

val values = List(List("1", "One") ,List("1", "Two") ,List("2", "Three"),List("2","4")).map(x =>(x(0), x(1)))
val session = SparkSession.builder.config("spark.master", "local").getOrCreate
import session.implicits._
val dataFrame = values.toDF


dataFrame.show()
dataFrame.printSchema()

val newSchema = StructType(dataFrame.schema.fields
++ Array(
StructField("Count", IntegerType, false)
)
)

val expr = RowEncoder.apply(newSchema)

val tranform = dataFrame.groupByKey(row => row.getAs[String]("_1")).flatMapGroups((key, inputItr) => {
val inputSeq = inputItr.toSeq

val length = inputSeq.size
var listBuff = new ListBuffer[Row]()
var counter : Int= 0
for(i <- 0 until(length))
{
counter+=1

}

for(i <- 0 until length ) {
var x = inputSeq(i)
listBuff += Row.fromSeq(x.toSeq ++ Array[Int](counter))
}
listBuff.iterator
})(expr)

tranform.show

val newSchema1 = StructType(tranform.schema.fields
++ Array(
StructField("Count1", IntegerType, false)
)
)
val expr1 = RowEncoder.apply(newSchema1)
val tranform2 = tranform.groupByKey(row => row.getAs[String]("_1")).flatMapGroups((key, inputItr) => {
val inputSeq = inputItr.toSeq

val length = inputSeq.size
var listBuff = new ListBuffer[Row]()
var counter : Int= 0
for(i <- 0 until(length))
{
counter+=1

}

for(i <- 0 until length ) {
var x = inputSeq(i)
listBuff += Row.fromSeq(x.toSeq ++ Array[Int](counter))
}
listBuff.iterator
})(expr1)

tranform2.show
}
}


Following is the stacktrace



18/11/21 19:39:03 WARN TaskSetManager: Lost task 144.0 in stage 11.0 (TID 400, localhost, executor driver): java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: fieldIndex on a Row without schema is undefined.
at org.apache.spark.sql.Row$class.fieldIndex(Row.scala:342)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GenericRow.fieldIndex(rows.scala:166)
at org.apache.spark.sql.Row$class.getAs(Row.scala:333)
at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GenericRow.getAs(rows.scala:166)
at com.quantuting.sparkutils.main.Test$$anonfun$4.apply(Test.scala:59)
at com.quantuting.sparkutils.main.Test$$anonfun$4.apply(Test.scala:59)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.AppendColumnsWithObjectExec$$anonfun$9$$anonfun$apply$3.apply(objects.scala:300)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.AppendColumnsWithObjectExec$$anonfun$9$$anonfun$apply$3.apply(objects.scala:298)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.next(Iterator.scala:409)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.next(Iterator.scala:409)
at org.apache.spark.shuffle.sort.BypassMergeSortShuffleWriter.write(BypassMergeSortShuffleWriter.java:149)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:96)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:53)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:109)
at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:345)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)


How to fix this code?







scala apache-spark






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 21 at 14:24

























asked Nov 20 at 16:03









Bay Max

779




779






This question has an open bounty worth +50
reputation from Bay Max ending tomorrow.


Looking for an answer drawing from credible and/or official sources.


I have been struggling to get around this issue for a while now, would appreciate if someone from Spark community can address this question.








This question has an open bounty worth +50
reputation from Bay Max ending tomorrow.


Looking for an answer drawing from credible and/or official sources.


I have been struggling to get around this issue for a while now, would appreciate if someone from Spark community can address this question.










  • 1




    @user6910411: added the stacktrace. Will be difficult to put the reproducible code, as the flow is integrated in a framework over multiple libraries. But can answer whatever details would be required
    – Bay Max
    Nov 20 at 16:28










  • Can you post the case class definitions for the two datasets? Did you add the naturalRank field to the second?
    – sramalingam24
    Nov 20 at 18:37










  • Also you can just do row => row.ticker if the schema is specified correctly
    – sramalingam24
    Nov 20 at 19:23














  • 1




    @user6910411: added the stacktrace. Will be difficult to put the reproducible code, as the flow is integrated in a framework over multiple libraries. But can answer whatever details would be required
    – Bay Max
    Nov 20 at 16:28










  • Can you post the case class definitions for the two datasets? Did you add the naturalRank field to the second?
    – sramalingam24
    Nov 20 at 18:37










  • Also you can just do row => row.ticker if the schema is specified correctly
    – sramalingam24
    Nov 20 at 19:23








1




1




@user6910411: added the stacktrace. Will be difficult to put the reproducible code, as the flow is integrated in a framework over multiple libraries. But can answer whatever details would be required
– Bay Max
Nov 20 at 16:28




@user6910411: added the stacktrace. Will be difficult to put the reproducible code, as the flow is integrated in a framework over multiple libraries. But can answer whatever details would be required
– Bay Max
Nov 20 at 16:28












Can you post the case class definitions for the two datasets? Did you add the naturalRank field to the second?
– sramalingam24
Nov 20 at 18:37




Can you post the case class definitions for the two datasets? Did you add the naturalRank field to the second?
– sramalingam24
Nov 20 at 18:37












Also you can just do row => row.ticker if the schema is specified correctly
– sramalingam24
Nov 20 at 19:23




Also you can just do row => row.ticker if the schema is specified correctly
– sramalingam24
Nov 20 at 19:23












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














The reported problem could be avoided by replacing the fieldname version of getAs[T] method (used in the function for groupByKey):



groupByKey(row => row.getAs[String]("_1"))


with the field-position version:



groupByKey(row => row.getAs[String](fieldIndexMap("_1")))


where fieldIndexMap maps field names to their corresponding field indexes:



val fieldIndexMap = tranform.schema.fieldNames.zipWithIndex.toMap


As a side note, your function for flatMapGroups can be simplified into something like below:



val tranform2 = tranform.groupByKey(_.getAs[String](fieldIndexMap("_1"))).
flatMapGroups((key, inputItr) => {
val inputSeq = inputItr.toSeq
val length = inputSeq.size
inputSeq.map(r => Row.fromSeq(r.toSeq :+ length))
})(expr1)


The inconsistent behavior between applying the original groupByKey/flatMapGroups methods to "dataFrame" versus "tranform" is apparently related to how the methods handle a DataFrame versus a Dataset[Row].






share|improve this answer























  • Accepting the answer after the expanded illustration. Also I have already raised a Spark bug yesterday issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26436
    – Bay Max
    2 days ago











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53396949%2fjava-lang-unsupportedoperationexceptionfieldindex-on-a-row-without-schema-is-und%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














The reported problem could be avoided by replacing the fieldname version of getAs[T] method (used in the function for groupByKey):



groupByKey(row => row.getAs[String]("_1"))


with the field-position version:



groupByKey(row => row.getAs[String](fieldIndexMap("_1")))


where fieldIndexMap maps field names to their corresponding field indexes:



val fieldIndexMap = tranform.schema.fieldNames.zipWithIndex.toMap


As a side note, your function for flatMapGroups can be simplified into something like below:



val tranform2 = tranform.groupByKey(_.getAs[String](fieldIndexMap("_1"))).
flatMapGroups((key, inputItr) => {
val inputSeq = inputItr.toSeq
val length = inputSeq.size
inputSeq.map(r => Row.fromSeq(r.toSeq :+ length))
})(expr1)


The inconsistent behavior between applying the original groupByKey/flatMapGroups methods to "dataFrame" versus "tranform" is apparently related to how the methods handle a DataFrame versus a Dataset[Row].






share|improve this answer























  • Accepting the answer after the expanded illustration. Also I have already raised a Spark bug yesterday issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26436
    – Bay Max
    2 days ago
















1














The reported problem could be avoided by replacing the fieldname version of getAs[T] method (used in the function for groupByKey):



groupByKey(row => row.getAs[String]("_1"))


with the field-position version:



groupByKey(row => row.getAs[String](fieldIndexMap("_1")))


where fieldIndexMap maps field names to their corresponding field indexes:



val fieldIndexMap = tranform.schema.fieldNames.zipWithIndex.toMap


As a side note, your function for flatMapGroups can be simplified into something like below:



val tranform2 = tranform.groupByKey(_.getAs[String](fieldIndexMap("_1"))).
flatMapGroups((key, inputItr) => {
val inputSeq = inputItr.toSeq
val length = inputSeq.size
inputSeq.map(r => Row.fromSeq(r.toSeq :+ length))
})(expr1)


The inconsistent behavior between applying the original groupByKey/flatMapGroups methods to "dataFrame" versus "tranform" is apparently related to how the methods handle a DataFrame versus a Dataset[Row].






share|improve this answer























  • Accepting the answer after the expanded illustration. Also I have already raised a Spark bug yesterday issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26436
    – Bay Max
    2 days ago














1












1








1






The reported problem could be avoided by replacing the fieldname version of getAs[T] method (used in the function for groupByKey):



groupByKey(row => row.getAs[String]("_1"))


with the field-position version:



groupByKey(row => row.getAs[String](fieldIndexMap("_1")))


where fieldIndexMap maps field names to their corresponding field indexes:



val fieldIndexMap = tranform.schema.fieldNames.zipWithIndex.toMap


As a side note, your function for flatMapGroups can be simplified into something like below:



val tranform2 = tranform.groupByKey(_.getAs[String](fieldIndexMap("_1"))).
flatMapGroups((key, inputItr) => {
val inputSeq = inputItr.toSeq
val length = inputSeq.size
inputSeq.map(r => Row.fromSeq(r.toSeq :+ length))
})(expr1)


The inconsistent behavior between applying the original groupByKey/flatMapGroups methods to "dataFrame" versus "tranform" is apparently related to how the methods handle a DataFrame versus a Dataset[Row].






share|improve this answer














The reported problem could be avoided by replacing the fieldname version of getAs[T] method (used in the function for groupByKey):



groupByKey(row => row.getAs[String]("_1"))


with the field-position version:



groupByKey(row => row.getAs[String](fieldIndexMap("_1")))


where fieldIndexMap maps field names to their corresponding field indexes:



val fieldIndexMap = tranform.schema.fieldNames.zipWithIndex.toMap


As a side note, your function for flatMapGroups can be simplified into something like below:



val tranform2 = tranform.groupByKey(_.getAs[String](fieldIndexMap("_1"))).
flatMapGroups((key, inputItr) => {
val inputSeq = inputItr.toSeq
val length = inputSeq.size
inputSeq.map(r => Row.fromSeq(r.toSeq :+ length))
})(expr1)


The inconsistent behavior between applying the original groupByKey/flatMapGroups methods to "dataFrame" versus "tranform" is apparently related to how the methods handle a DataFrame versus a Dataset[Row].







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 2 days ago

























answered Dec 26 at 1:52









Leo C

10.1k2616




10.1k2616












  • Accepting the answer after the expanded illustration. Also I have already raised a Spark bug yesterday issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26436
    – Bay Max
    2 days ago


















  • Accepting the answer after the expanded illustration. Also I have already raised a Spark bug yesterday issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26436
    – Bay Max
    2 days ago
















Accepting the answer after the expanded illustration. Also I have already raised a Spark bug yesterday issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26436
– Bay Max
2 days ago




Accepting the answer after the expanded illustration. Also I have already raised a Spark bug yesterday issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26436
– Bay Max
2 days ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53396949%2fjava-lang-unsupportedoperationexceptionfieldindex-on-a-row-without-schema-is-und%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Create new schema in PostgreSQL using DBeaver

Deepest pit of an array with Javascript: test on Codility

Costa Masnaga