Python2: multiprocessing.dummy.Pool vs multiprocessing.pool.ThreadPool












1














In python 2, is there any difference between multiprocessing.dummy.Pool and multiprocessing.pool.ThreadPool? The source code seems to imply they're the same.










share|improve this question





























    1














    In python 2, is there any difference between multiprocessing.dummy.Pool and multiprocessing.pool.ThreadPool? The source code seems to imply they're the same.










    share|improve this question



























      1












      1








      1







      In python 2, is there any difference between multiprocessing.dummy.Pool and multiprocessing.pool.ThreadPool? The source code seems to imply they're the same.










      share|improve this question















      In python 2, is there any difference between multiprocessing.dummy.Pool and multiprocessing.pool.ThreadPool? The source code seems to imply they're the same.







      python python-2.7 threadpool python-multiprocessing python-multithreading






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 20 at 16:47









      ShadowRanger

      57.3k45094




      57.3k45094










      asked Nov 20 at 16:42









      user1071847

      283514




      283514
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          They're the same (both on Py2 and Py3); multiprocessing.dummy.Pool is just a thin wrapper that imports and calls multiprocessing.pool.ThreadPool. The actual code is just:



          def Pool(processes=None, initializer=None, initargs=()):
          from multiprocessing.pool import ThreadPool
          return ThreadPool(processes, initializer, initargs)


          In general, I'd prefer using multiprocessing.dummy.Pool only because the existence of multiprocessing.dummy is officially documented, where multiprocessing.pool is not (it's an internal implementation detail).






          share|improve this answer





















          • Thanks for stating your preference as to which to use.
            – user1071847
            Nov 20 at 17:09











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53397632%2fpython2-multiprocessing-dummy-pool-vs-multiprocessing-pool-threadpool%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2














          They're the same (both on Py2 and Py3); multiprocessing.dummy.Pool is just a thin wrapper that imports and calls multiprocessing.pool.ThreadPool. The actual code is just:



          def Pool(processes=None, initializer=None, initargs=()):
          from multiprocessing.pool import ThreadPool
          return ThreadPool(processes, initializer, initargs)


          In general, I'd prefer using multiprocessing.dummy.Pool only because the existence of multiprocessing.dummy is officially documented, where multiprocessing.pool is not (it's an internal implementation detail).






          share|improve this answer





















          • Thanks for stating your preference as to which to use.
            – user1071847
            Nov 20 at 17:09
















          2














          They're the same (both on Py2 and Py3); multiprocessing.dummy.Pool is just a thin wrapper that imports and calls multiprocessing.pool.ThreadPool. The actual code is just:



          def Pool(processes=None, initializer=None, initargs=()):
          from multiprocessing.pool import ThreadPool
          return ThreadPool(processes, initializer, initargs)


          In general, I'd prefer using multiprocessing.dummy.Pool only because the existence of multiprocessing.dummy is officially documented, where multiprocessing.pool is not (it's an internal implementation detail).






          share|improve this answer





















          • Thanks for stating your preference as to which to use.
            – user1071847
            Nov 20 at 17:09














          2












          2








          2






          They're the same (both on Py2 and Py3); multiprocessing.dummy.Pool is just a thin wrapper that imports and calls multiprocessing.pool.ThreadPool. The actual code is just:



          def Pool(processes=None, initializer=None, initargs=()):
          from multiprocessing.pool import ThreadPool
          return ThreadPool(processes, initializer, initargs)


          In general, I'd prefer using multiprocessing.dummy.Pool only because the existence of multiprocessing.dummy is officially documented, where multiprocessing.pool is not (it's an internal implementation detail).






          share|improve this answer












          They're the same (both on Py2 and Py3); multiprocessing.dummy.Pool is just a thin wrapper that imports and calls multiprocessing.pool.ThreadPool. The actual code is just:



          def Pool(processes=None, initializer=None, initargs=()):
          from multiprocessing.pool import ThreadPool
          return ThreadPool(processes, initializer, initargs)


          In general, I'd prefer using multiprocessing.dummy.Pool only because the existence of multiprocessing.dummy is officially documented, where multiprocessing.pool is not (it's an internal implementation detail).







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 20 at 16:46









          ShadowRanger

          57.3k45094




          57.3k45094












          • Thanks for stating your preference as to which to use.
            – user1071847
            Nov 20 at 17:09


















          • Thanks for stating your preference as to which to use.
            – user1071847
            Nov 20 at 17:09
















          Thanks for stating your preference as to which to use.
          – user1071847
          Nov 20 at 17:09




          Thanks for stating your preference as to which to use.
          – user1071847
          Nov 20 at 17:09


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53397632%2fpython2-multiprocessing-dummy-pool-vs-multiprocessing-pool-threadpool%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Create new schema in PostgreSQL using DBeaver

          Deepest pit of an array with Javascript: test on Codility

          Costa Masnaga