What's the difference between “left_joins” and “includes” in Rails 5?












0















In Rails 5, they have added the ActiveRecord query method left_joins. What's the difference between left_joins and includes? I've always seen includes as a left join.










share|improve this question



























    0















    In Rails 5, they have added the ActiveRecord query method left_joins. What's the difference between left_joins and includes? I've always seen includes as a left join.










    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0








      In Rails 5, they have added the ActiveRecord query method left_joins. What's the difference between left_joins and includes? I've always seen includes as a left join.










      share|improve this question














      In Rails 5, they have added the ActiveRecord query method left_joins. What's the difference between left_joins and includes? I've always seen includes as a left join.







      ruby-on-rails activerecord ruby-on-rails-5






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 21 '18 at 15:00









      daveomcddaveomcd

      2,8971066106




      2,8971066106
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          includes by default loads the association data in 2 queries just like preload.
          But with additional references call it switches from using two separate queries to creating a single LEFT OUTER JOIN like left_joins.



          Refs:



          Preload, Eagerload, Includes and Joins



          Making sense of ActiveRecord joins, includes, preload, and eager_load






          share|improve this answer
























          • Includes will also defer to .eager_load and load the records in one query if you apply a where clause.

            – max
            Nov 21 '18 at 16:19











          • @max But you cant use eager loaded tables via includes in where clause by default. You need to specify them in references first

            – Martin Zinovsky
            Nov 21 '18 at 16:21













          • I''m not sure what you mean but you can do Foo.includes(:bars).where(bars: { baz: 'woo' }). The result is the same as if you used eager_load.

            – max
            Nov 21 '18 at 16:23













          • @max yeah but if you change your example to Foo.includes(:bars).where("bars.baz = 'woo'") it will throw an error. Check out conditions part in includes docs

            – Martin Zinovsky
            Nov 21 '18 at 16:28








          • 1





            @max But I didnt know that hash notation works without references call so thank you

            – Martin Zinovsky
            Nov 21 '18 at 16:32













          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53414830%2fwhats-the-difference-between-left-joins-and-includes-in-rails-5%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1














          includes by default loads the association data in 2 queries just like preload.
          But with additional references call it switches from using two separate queries to creating a single LEFT OUTER JOIN like left_joins.



          Refs:



          Preload, Eagerload, Includes and Joins



          Making sense of ActiveRecord joins, includes, preload, and eager_load






          share|improve this answer
























          • Includes will also defer to .eager_load and load the records in one query if you apply a where clause.

            – max
            Nov 21 '18 at 16:19











          • @max But you cant use eager loaded tables via includes in where clause by default. You need to specify them in references first

            – Martin Zinovsky
            Nov 21 '18 at 16:21













          • I''m not sure what you mean but you can do Foo.includes(:bars).where(bars: { baz: 'woo' }). The result is the same as if you used eager_load.

            – max
            Nov 21 '18 at 16:23













          • @max yeah but if you change your example to Foo.includes(:bars).where("bars.baz = 'woo'") it will throw an error. Check out conditions part in includes docs

            – Martin Zinovsky
            Nov 21 '18 at 16:28








          • 1





            @max But I didnt know that hash notation works without references call so thank you

            – Martin Zinovsky
            Nov 21 '18 at 16:32


















          1














          includes by default loads the association data in 2 queries just like preload.
          But with additional references call it switches from using two separate queries to creating a single LEFT OUTER JOIN like left_joins.



          Refs:



          Preload, Eagerload, Includes and Joins



          Making sense of ActiveRecord joins, includes, preload, and eager_load






          share|improve this answer
























          • Includes will also defer to .eager_load and load the records in one query if you apply a where clause.

            – max
            Nov 21 '18 at 16:19











          • @max But you cant use eager loaded tables via includes in where clause by default. You need to specify them in references first

            – Martin Zinovsky
            Nov 21 '18 at 16:21













          • I''m not sure what you mean but you can do Foo.includes(:bars).where(bars: { baz: 'woo' }). The result is the same as if you used eager_load.

            – max
            Nov 21 '18 at 16:23













          • @max yeah but if you change your example to Foo.includes(:bars).where("bars.baz = 'woo'") it will throw an error. Check out conditions part in includes docs

            – Martin Zinovsky
            Nov 21 '18 at 16:28








          • 1





            @max But I didnt know that hash notation works without references call so thank you

            – Martin Zinovsky
            Nov 21 '18 at 16:32
















          1












          1








          1







          includes by default loads the association data in 2 queries just like preload.
          But with additional references call it switches from using two separate queries to creating a single LEFT OUTER JOIN like left_joins.



          Refs:



          Preload, Eagerload, Includes and Joins



          Making sense of ActiveRecord joins, includes, preload, and eager_load






          share|improve this answer













          includes by default loads the association data in 2 queries just like preload.
          But with additional references call it switches from using two separate queries to creating a single LEFT OUTER JOIN like left_joins.



          Refs:



          Preload, Eagerload, Includes and Joins



          Making sense of ActiveRecord joins, includes, preload, and eager_load







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 21 '18 at 15:14









          Martin ZinovskyMartin Zinovsky

          1,5041816




          1,5041816













          • Includes will also defer to .eager_load and load the records in one query if you apply a where clause.

            – max
            Nov 21 '18 at 16:19











          • @max But you cant use eager loaded tables via includes in where clause by default. You need to specify them in references first

            – Martin Zinovsky
            Nov 21 '18 at 16:21













          • I''m not sure what you mean but you can do Foo.includes(:bars).where(bars: { baz: 'woo' }). The result is the same as if you used eager_load.

            – max
            Nov 21 '18 at 16:23













          • @max yeah but if you change your example to Foo.includes(:bars).where("bars.baz = 'woo'") it will throw an error. Check out conditions part in includes docs

            – Martin Zinovsky
            Nov 21 '18 at 16:28








          • 1





            @max But I didnt know that hash notation works without references call so thank you

            – Martin Zinovsky
            Nov 21 '18 at 16:32





















          • Includes will also defer to .eager_load and load the records in one query if you apply a where clause.

            – max
            Nov 21 '18 at 16:19











          • @max But you cant use eager loaded tables via includes in where clause by default. You need to specify them in references first

            – Martin Zinovsky
            Nov 21 '18 at 16:21













          • I''m not sure what you mean but you can do Foo.includes(:bars).where(bars: { baz: 'woo' }). The result is the same as if you used eager_load.

            – max
            Nov 21 '18 at 16:23













          • @max yeah but if you change your example to Foo.includes(:bars).where("bars.baz = 'woo'") it will throw an error. Check out conditions part in includes docs

            – Martin Zinovsky
            Nov 21 '18 at 16:28








          • 1





            @max But I didnt know that hash notation works without references call so thank you

            – Martin Zinovsky
            Nov 21 '18 at 16:32



















          Includes will also defer to .eager_load and load the records in one query if you apply a where clause.

          – max
          Nov 21 '18 at 16:19





          Includes will also defer to .eager_load and load the records in one query if you apply a where clause.

          – max
          Nov 21 '18 at 16:19













          @max But you cant use eager loaded tables via includes in where clause by default. You need to specify them in references first

          – Martin Zinovsky
          Nov 21 '18 at 16:21







          @max But you cant use eager loaded tables via includes in where clause by default. You need to specify them in references first

          – Martin Zinovsky
          Nov 21 '18 at 16:21















          I''m not sure what you mean but you can do Foo.includes(:bars).where(bars: { baz: 'woo' }). The result is the same as if you used eager_load.

          – max
          Nov 21 '18 at 16:23







          I''m not sure what you mean but you can do Foo.includes(:bars).where(bars: { baz: 'woo' }). The result is the same as if you used eager_load.

          – max
          Nov 21 '18 at 16:23















          @max yeah but if you change your example to Foo.includes(:bars).where("bars.baz = 'woo'") it will throw an error. Check out conditions part in includes docs

          – Martin Zinovsky
          Nov 21 '18 at 16:28







          @max yeah but if you change your example to Foo.includes(:bars).where("bars.baz = 'woo'") it will throw an error. Check out conditions part in includes docs

          – Martin Zinovsky
          Nov 21 '18 at 16:28






          1




          1





          @max But I didnt know that hash notation works without references call so thank you

          – Martin Zinovsky
          Nov 21 '18 at 16:32







          @max But I didnt know that hash notation works without references call so thank you

          – Martin Zinovsky
          Nov 21 '18 at 16:32




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53414830%2fwhats-the-difference-between-left-joins-and-includes-in-rails-5%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Create new schema in PostgreSQL using DBeaver

          Deepest pit of an array with Javascript: test on Codility

          Costa Masnaga