Which option is good in terms of software design?












0















I have one request interface(IRequest) and two classes(ClientAddress & ClientOrder) are implementing it and the same design is followed for Response.



I have tried to do it 2 ways-
1. With Explicit type casting by assigning class object to interface.
2. By using classes object and variable



public interface IRequest
{
string ClientId { get; set; }
}

public class ClientAddress : IRequest
{
public string ClientId { get; set; }
public string AppId { get; set; }
}

public class ClientOrder : IRequest
{
public string ClientId { get; set; }
public string FromDate { get; set; }
public string ToDate { get; set; }
//other properties
}

public interface IResponse
{
string ClientName { get; set; }
}

public class ClientAddressResponse : IResponse
{
public string ClientName { get; set; }
public string HouseNumber { get; set; }
public string Area { get; set; }
public string City { get; set; }
}

public class ClientOrderResponse : IResponse
{
public string ClientName { get; set; }
public List<Orders> OrderList { get; set; }
//other properties
}

public class DAL
{
public IResponse GetAddress(IRequest req)
{
//return client address
}
public IResponse GetOrderList(IRequest req)
{
//return order list
}
}

////Option 1:
class Program
{
static void Main(string args)
{
IRequest req1 = new ClientAddress();
req1.ClientId = 1;
((ClientAddress)req1).AppId = "abcd";
DAL d = new DAL();
IResponse res1 = d.GetAddress(req1);

IRequest req2 = new ClientOrder();
req2.ClientId = 1;
((ClientOrder)req2).FromDate = "2019/01/01";
((ClientOrder)req2).ToDate = "2019/01/15";
IResponse res2 = d.GetOrderList(req2);
}
}

////Option 2-
class Program
{
static void Main(string args)
{
ClientAddress req1 = new ClientAddress();
req1.ClientId = 1;
req1.AppId = "abcd";
DAL d = new DAL();
IResponse res1 = d.GetAddress(req1);

ClientOrder req2 = new ClientOrder();
req2.ClientId = 1;
req2.FromDate = "2019/01/01";
req2.ToDate = "2019/01/15";
IResponse res2 = d.GetOrderList(req2);
}
}


Please guide me which design is good/bad and why we should use/avoid it.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Mogli is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    0















    I have one request interface(IRequest) and two classes(ClientAddress & ClientOrder) are implementing it and the same design is followed for Response.



    I have tried to do it 2 ways-
    1. With Explicit type casting by assigning class object to interface.
    2. By using classes object and variable



    public interface IRequest
    {
    string ClientId { get; set; }
    }

    public class ClientAddress : IRequest
    {
    public string ClientId { get; set; }
    public string AppId { get; set; }
    }

    public class ClientOrder : IRequest
    {
    public string ClientId { get; set; }
    public string FromDate { get; set; }
    public string ToDate { get; set; }
    //other properties
    }

    public interface IResponse
    {
    string ClientName { get; set; }
    }

    public class ClientAddressResponse : IResponse
    {
    public string ClientName { get; set; }
    public string HouseNumber { get; set; }
    public string Area { get; set; }
    public string City { get; set; }
    }

    public class ClientOrderResponse : IResponse
    {
    public string ClientName { get; set; }
    public List<Orders> OrderList { get; set; }
    //other properties
    }

    public class DAL
    {
    public IResponse GetAddress(IRequest req)
    {
    //return client address
    }
    public IResponse GetOrderList(IRequest req)
    {
    //return order list
    }
    }

    ////Option 1:
    class Program
    {
    static void Main(string args)
    {
    IRequest req1 = new ClientAddress();
    req1.ClientId = 1;
    ((ClientAddress)req1).AppId = "abcd";
    DAL d = new DAL();
    IResponse res1 = d.GetAddress(req1);

    IRequest req2 = new ClientOrder();
    req2.ClientId = 1;
    ((ClientOrder)req2).FromDate = "2019/01/01";
    ((ClientOrder)req2).ToDate = "2019/01/15";
    IResponse res2 = d.GetOrderList(req2);
    }
    }

    ////Option 2-
    class Program
    {
    static void Main(string args)
    {
    ClientAddress req1 = new ClientAddress();
    req1.ClientId = 1;
    req1.AppId = "abcd";
    DAL d = new DAL();
    IResponse res1 = d.GetAddress(req1);

    ClientOrder req2 = new ClientOrder();
    req2.ClientId = 1;
    req2.FromDate = "2019/01/01";
    req2.ToDate = "2019/01/15";
    IResponse res2 = d.GetOrderList(req2);
    }
    }


    Please guide me which design is good/bad and why we should use/avoid it.










    share|improve this question







    New contributor




    Mogli is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      0












      0








      0








      I have one request interface(IRequest) and two classes(ClientAddress & ClientOrder) are implementing it and the same design is followed for Response.



      I have tried to do it 2 ways-
      1. With Explicit type casting by assigning class object to interface.
      2. By using classes object and variable



      public interface IRequest
      {
      string ClientId { get; set; }
      }

      public class ClientAddress : IRequest
      {
      public string ClientId { get; set; }
      public string AppId { get; set; }
      }

      public class ClientOrder : IRequest
      {
      public string ClientId { get; set; }
      public string FromDate { get; set; }
      public string ToDate { get; set; }
      //other properties
      }

      public interface IResponse
      {
      string ClientName { get; set; }
      }

      public class ClientAddressResponse : IResponse
      {
      public string ClientName { get; set; }
      public string HouseNumber { get; set; }
      public string Area { get; set; }
      public string City { get; set; }
      }

      public class ClientOrderResponse : IResponse
      {
      public string ClientName { get; set; }
      public List<Orders> OrderList { get; set; }
      //other properties
      }

      public class DAL
      {
      public IResponse GetAddress(IRequest req)
      {
      //return client address
      }
      public IResponse GetOrderList(IRequest req)
      {
      //return order list
      }
      }

      ////Option 1:
      class Program
      {
      static void Main(string args)
      {
      IRequest req1 = new ClientAddress();
      req1.ClientId = 1;
      ((ClientAddress)req1).AppId = "abcd";
      DAL d = new DAL();
      IResponse res1 = d.GetAddress(req1);

      IRequest req2 = new ClientOrder();
      req2.ClientId = 1;
      ((ClientOrder)req2).FromDate = "2019/01/01";
      ((ClientOrder)req2).ToDate = "2019/01/15";
      IResponse res2 = d.GetOrderList(req2);
      }
      }

      ////Option 2-
      class Program
      {
      static void Main(string args)
      {
      ClientAddress req1 = new ClientAddress();
      req1.ClientId = 1;
      req1.AppId = "abcd";
      DAL d = new DAL();
      IResponse res1 = d.GetAddress(req1);

      ClientOrder req2 = new ClientOrder();
      req2.ClientId = 1;
      req2.FromDate = "2019/01/01";
      req2.ToDate = "2019/01/15";
      IResponse res2 = d.GetOrderList(req2);
      }
      }


      Please guide me which design is good/bad and why we should use/avoid it.










      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Mogli is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      I have one request interface(IRequest) and two classes(ClientAddress & ClientOrder) are implementing it and the same design is followed for Response.



      I have tried to do it 2 ways-
      1. With Explicit type casting by assigning class object to interface.
      2. By using classes object and variable



      public interface IRequest
      {
      string ClientId { get; set; }
      }

      public class ClientAddress : IRequest
      {
      public string ClientId { get; set; }
      public string AppId { get; set; }
      }

      public class ClientOrder : IRequest
      {
      public string ClientId { get; set; }
      public string FromDate { get; set; }
      public string ToDate { get; set; }
      //other properties
      }

      public interface IResponse
      {
      string ClientName { get; set; }
      }

      public class ClientAddressResponse : IResponse
      {
      public string ClientName { get; set; }
      public string HouseNumber { get; set; }
      public string Area { get; set; }
      public string City { get; set; }
      }

      public class ClientOrderResponse : IResponse
      {
      public string ClientName { get; set; }
      public List<Orders> OrderList { get; set; }
      //other properties
      }

      public class DAL
      {
      public IResponse GetAddress(IRequest req)
      {
      //return client address
      }
      public IResponse GetOrderList(IRequest req)
      {
      //return order list
      }
      }

      ////Option 1:
      class Program
      {
      static void Main(string args)
      {
      IRequest req1 = new ClientAddress();
      req1.ClientId = 1;
      ((ClientAddress)req1).AppId = "abcd";
      DAL d = new DAL();
      IResponse res1 = d.GetAddress(req1);

      IRequest req2 = new ClientOrder();
      req2.ClientId = 1;
      ((ClientOrder)req2).FromDate = "2019/01/01";
      ((ClientOrder)req2).ToDate = "2019/01/15";
      IResponse res2 = d.GetOrderList(req2);
      }
      }

      ////Option 2-
      class Program
      {
      static void Main(string args)
      {
      ClientAddress req1 = new ClientAddress();
      req1.ClientId = 1;
      req1.AppId = "abcd";
      DAL d = new DAL();
      IResponse res1 = d.GetAddress(req1);

      ClientOrder req2 = new ClientOrder();
      req2.ClientId = 1;
      req2.FromDate = "2019/01/01";
      req2.ToDate = "2019/01/15";
      IResponse res2 = d.GetOrderList(req2);
      }
      }


      Please guide me which design is good/bad and why we should use/avoid it.







      c# object-oriented design-patterns interface






      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Mogli is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Mogli is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor




      Mogli is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 10 mins ago









      MogliMogli

      11




      11




      New contributor




      Mogli is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Mogli is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Mogli is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "196"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          Mogli is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f211456%2fwhich-option-is-good-in-terms-of-software-design%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          Mogli is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          Mogli is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          Mogli is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          Mogli is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f211456%2fwhich-option-is-good-in-terms-of-software-design%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Create new schema in PostgreSQL using DBeaver

          Deepest pit of an array with Javascript: test on Codility

          Costa Masnaga