Intellij hint condition is always true - how does it know?












1















Students were given an exercise to practice basic software development practices and I decided to run through it myself to see how it would go. Specifically, writing a program that converts an integer (i.e. unix timestamp) into a formatted string. Practicing TDD is part of the exercise so I've done that myself.



In other words, instead of trying to make the currently failing test pass elegantly, I'm trying to make it pass as simply as possible, and finding refactoring opportunities as they arise.



I am doing this in Java 11 with Intellij IDEA.



This is the state I am currently in. The timestamp for "1970-03-01 00:00:00" incorrectly returned "1970-02-29 00:00:00" so I made appropriate adjustments. I had similar issues with the timestamps for March 2 and March 3, and the naive fix is what's in the code below.



public MyTime(int i) {
timestamp = i;

months = (timestamp / (31*86400) % 12) + 1;
days = (timestamp / 86400 % 31) + 1;
hours = timestamp / 3600 % 24;
minutes = timestamp / 60 % 60;
seconds = timestamp % 60;

if (months == 2 && days > 28) {
months = 3;
if (days == 29) {
days = 1;
} else if (days == 30) {
days = 2;
} else if (days == 31) {
days = 3;
}

}
}


The obvious refactor here is days -= 28, which hints at a more generic daysInMonth() for later... All the divisions and modulo stuff needs work, too.



My actual question is about the else if (days == 31) statement. Intellij gives me a warning that this condition is always true. I mean, it is, because days is (x % 31) + 1 but this seems like a really complicated thing for an IDE to figure out.



Does anyone know what it's doing under the hood?










share|improve this question



























    1















    Students were given an exercise to practice basic software development practices and I decided to run through it myself to see how it would go. Specifically, writing a program that converts an integer (i.e. unix timestamp) into a formatted string. Practicing TDD is part of the exercise so I've done that myself.



    In other words, instead of trying to make the currently failing test pass elegantly, I'm trying to make it pass as simply as possible, and finding refactoring opportunities as they arise.



    I am doing this in Java 11 with Intellij IDEA.



    This is the state I am currently in. The timestamp for "1970-03-01 00:00:00" incorrectly returned "1970-02-29 00:00:00" so I made appropriate adjustments. I had similar issues with the timestamps for March 2 and March 3, and the naive fix is what's in the code below.



    public MyTime(int i) {
    timestamp = i;

    months = (timestamp / (31*86400) % 12) + 1;
    days = (timestamp / 86400 % 31) + 1;
    hours = timestamp / 3600 % 24;
    minutes = timestamp / 60 % 60;
    seconds = timestamp % 60;

    if (months == 2 && days > 28) {
    months = 3;
    if (days == 29) {
    days = 1;
    } else if (days == 30) {
    days = 2;
    } else if (days == 31) {
    days = 3;
    }

    }
    }


    The obvious refactor here is days -= 28, which hints at a more generic daysInMonth() for later... All the divisions and modulo stuff needs work, too.



    My actual question is about the else if (days == 31) statement. Intellij gives me a warning that this condition is always true. I mean, it is, because days is (x % 31) + 1 but this seems like a really complicated thing for an IDE to figure out.



    Does anyone know what it's doing under the hood?










    share|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1


      0






      Students were given an exercise to practice basic software development practices and I decided to run through it myself to see how it would go. Specifically, writing a program that converts an integer (i.e. unix timestamp) into a formatted string. Practicing TDD is part of the exercise so I've done that myself.



      In other words, instead of trying to make the currently failing test pass elegantly, I'm trying to make it pass as simply as possible, and finding refactoring opportunities as they arise.



      I am doing this in Java 11 with Intellij IDEA.



      This is the state I am currently in. The timestamp for "1970-03-01 00:00:00" incorrectly returned "1970-02-29 00:00:00" so I made appropriate adjustments. I had similar issues with the timestamps for March 2 and March 3, and the naive fix is what's in the code below.



      public MyTime(int i) {
      timestamp = i;

      months = (timestamp / (31*86400) % 12) + 1;
      days = (timestamp / 86400 % 31) + 1;
      hours = timestamp / 3600 % 24;
      minutes = timestamp / 60 % 60;
      seconds = timestamp % 60;

      if (months == 2 && days > 28) {
      months = 3;
      if (days == 29) {
      days = 1;
      } else if (days == 30) {
      days = 2;
      } else if (days == 31) {
      days = 3;
      }

      }
      }


      The obvious refactor here is days -= 28, which hints at a more generic daysInMonth() for later... All the divisions and modulo stuff needs work, too.



      My actual question is about the else if (days == 31) statement. Intellij gives me a warning that this condition is always true. I mean, it is, because days is (x % 31) + 1 but this seems like a really complicated thing for an IDE to figure out.



      Does anyone know what it's doing under the hood?










      share|improve this question














      Students were given an exercise to practice basic software development practices and I decided to run through it myself to see how it would go. Specifically, writing a program that converts an integer (i.e. unix timestamp) into a formatted string. Practicing TDD is part of the exercise so I've done that myself.



      In other words, instead of trying to make the currently failing test pass elegantly, I'm trying to make it pass as simply as possible, and finding refactoring opportunities as they arise.



      I am doing this in Java 11 with Intellij IDEA.



      This is the state I am currently in. The timestamp for "1970-03-01 00:00:00" incorrectly returned "1970-02-29 00:00:00" so I made appropriate adjustments. I had similar issues with the timestamps for March 2 and March 3, and the naive fix is what's in the code below.



      public MyTime(int i) {
      timestamp = i;

      months = (timestamp / (31*86400) % 12) + 1;
      days = (timestamp / 86400 % 31) + 1;
      hours = timestamp / 3600 % 24;
      minutes = timestamp / 60 % 60;
      seconds = timestamp % 60;

      if (months == 2 && days > 28) {
      months = 3;
      if (days == 29) {
      days = 1;
      } else if (days == 30) {
      days = 2;
      } else if (days == 31) {
      days = 3;
      }

      }
      }


      The obvious refactor here is days -= 28, which hints at a more generic daysInMonth() for later... All the divisions and modulo stuff needs work, too.



      My actual question is about the else if (days == 31) statement. Intellij gives me a warning that this condition is always true. I mean, it is, because days is (x % 31) + 1 but this seems like a really complicated thing for an IDE to figure out.



      Does anyone know what it's doing under the hood?







      intellij-idea






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 25 '18 at 19:14









      Andrew PearceAndrew Pearce

      141




      141
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          IntelliJ IDEA can perform pretty clever dataflow analyse. If you are unsure that this part was marked as always true because of (x % 31) + 1, you can increment 31 up to 32 and the warning will disappear.



          Here is blockpost with some examples of always true and always false inspection: https://blog.jetbrains.com/idea/2018/01/fumigating-the-idea-ultimate-code-using-dataflow-analysis/






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53470981%2fintellij-hint-condition-is-always-true-how-does-it-know%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0














            IntelliJ IDEA can perform pretty clever dataflow analyse. If you are unsure that this part was marked as always true because of (x % 31) + 1, you can increment 31 up to 32 and the warning will disappear.



            Here is blockpost with some examples of always true and always false inspection: https://blog.jetbrains.com/idea/2018/01/fumigating-the-idea-ultimate-code-using-dataflow-analysis/






            share|improve this answer




























              0














              IntelliJ IDEA can perform pretty clever dataflow analyse. If you are unsure that this part was marked as always true because of (x % 31) + 1, you can increment 31 up to 32 and the warning will disappear.



              Here is blockpost with some examples of always true and always false inspection: https://blog.jetbrains.com/idea/2018/01/fumigating-the-idea-ultimate-code-using-dataflow-analysis/






              share|improve this answer


























                0












                0








                0







                IntelliJ IDEA can perform pretty clever dataflow analyse. If you are unsure that this part was marked as always true because of (x % 31) + 1, you can increment 31 up to 32 and the warning will disappear.



                Here is blockpost with some examples of always true and always false inspection: https://blog.jetbrains.com/idea/2018/01/fumigating-the-idea-ultimate-code-using-dataflow-analysis/






                share|improve this answer













                IntelliJ IDEA can perform pretty clever dataflow analyse. If you are unsure that this part was marked as always true because of (x % 31) + 1, you can increment 31 up to 32 and the warning will disappear.



                Here is blockpost with some examples of always true and always false inspection: https://blog.jetbrains.com/idea/2018/01/fumigating-the-idea-ultimate-code-using-dataflow-analysis/







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Nov 26 '18 at 8:09









                Genetic ForestGenetic Forest

                1,98131526




                1,98131526
































                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53470981%2fintellij-hint-condition-is-always-true-how-does-it-know%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Create new schema in PostgreSQL using DBeaver

                    Deepest pit of an array with Javascript: test on Codility

                    Costa Masnaga