Strategy Pattern with ASP.Net Core DI












1















While building my Rest API I stumbled across building a Cached Repository based on this Article.



Building a CachedRepository via Strategy Pattern



I liked the idea because the code seemed nice and dry. Therefore I went and gave it a shot and the Implementation was quite nice.



However now I want to wire up my DI (the Standard Microsoft DI coming with ASP.Net Core and nothing fancy) and I am Facing some trouble there.



Basically the problem is that I have multiple implementation of the same interface and the cached implementation takes a reference to the direct implementation like so:



public class CachedArticleRepository : IArticleRepository
{
public CachedArticleRepository(IArticleRepository article, IMemoryCache cache)
{
_article = article;
_cache = cache;
}
}

public class ArticleRepository : IArticleRepository
{
public ArticleRepository(IAmbientContextLocator locator)
{
_locator = locator;
}
}


I use it in my service (as explained by the Article) like this:



public class DivisionService : IDivisionService
{
public DivisionService(IArticleRepository article)
{
_article = article;
}
}


My Question is now how can I configure the DI so that the Non Cached Variant is used for building the Cached Repository and the Cached Repository is used for everything else?










share|improve this question

























  • use the factory delegate when registering the service

    – Nkosi
    Nov 26 '18 at 0:09






  • 1





    The CachedArticleRepository class is an implementation of the Decorator design pattern.

    – Steven
    Nov 26 '18 at 8:50
















1















While building my Rest API I stumbled across building a Cached Repository based on this Article.



Building a CachedRepository via Strategy Pattern



I liked the idea because the code seemed nice and dry. Therefore I went and gave it a shot and the Implementation was quite nice.



However now I want to wire up my DI (the Standard Microsoft DI coming with ASP.Net Core and nothing fancy) and I am Facing some trouble there.



Basically the problem is that I have multiple implementation of the same interface and the cached implementation takes a reference to the direct implementation like so:



public class CachedArticleRepository : IArticleRepository
{
public CachedArticleRepository(IArticleRepository article, IMemoryCache cache)
{
_article = article;
_cache = cache;
}
}

public class ArticleRepository : IArticleRepository
{
public ArticleRepository(IAmbientContextLocator locator)
{
_locator = locator;
}
}


I use it in my service (as explained by the Article) like this:



public class DivisionService : IDivisionService
{
public DivisionService(IArticleRepository article)
{
_article = article;
}
}


My Question is now how can I configure the DI so that the Non Cached Variant is used for building the Cached Repository and the Cached Repository is used for everything else?










share|improve this question

























  • use the factory delegate when registering the service

    – Nkosi
    Nov 26 '18 at 0:09






  • 1





    The CachedArticleRepository class is an implementation of the Decorator design pattern.

    – Steven
    Nov 26 '18 at 8:50














1












1








1


0






While building my Rest API I stumbled across building a Cached Repository based on this Article.



Building a CachedRepository via Strategy Pattern



I liked the idea because the code seemed nice and dry. Therefore I went and gave it a shot and the Implementation was quite nice.



However now I want to wire up my DI (the Standard Microsoft DI coming with ASP.Net Core and nothing fancy) and I am Facing some trouble there.



Basically the problem is that I have multiple implementation of the same interface and the cached implementation takes a reference to the direct implementation like so:



public class CachedArticleRepository : IArticleRepository
{
public CachedArticleRepository(IArticleRepository article, IMemoryCache cache)
{
_article = article;
_cache = cache;
}
}

public class ArticleRepository : IArticleRepository
{
public ArticleRepository(IAmbientContextLocator locator)
{
_locator = locator;
}
}


I use it in my service (as explained by the Article) like this:



public class DivisionService : IDivisionService
{
public DivisionService(IArticleRepository article)
{
_article = article;
}
}


My Question is now how can I configure the DI so that the Non Cached Variant is used for building the Cached Repository and the Cached Repository is used for everything else?










share|improve this question
















While building my Rest API I stumbled across building a Cached Repository based on this Article.



Building a CachedRepository via Strategy Pattern



I liked the idea because the code seemed nice and dry. Therefore I went and gave it a shot and the Implementation was quite nice.



However now I want to wire up my DI (the Standard Microsoft DI coming with ASP.Net Core and nothing fancy) and I am Facing some trouble there.



Basically the problem is that I have multiple implementation of the same interface and the cached implementation takes a reference to the direct implementation like so:



public class CachedArticleRepository : IArticleRepository
{
public CachedArticleRepository(IArticleRepository article, IMemoryCache cache)
{
_article = article;
_cache = cache;
}
}

public class ArticleRepository : IArticleRepository
{
public ArticleRepository(IAmbientContextLocator locator)
{
_locator = locator;
}
}


I use it in my service (as explained by the Article) like this:



public class DivisionService : IDivisionService
{
public DivisionService(IArticleRepository article)
{
_article = article;
}
}


My Question is now how can I configure the DI so that the Non Cached Variant is used for building the Cached Repository and the Cached Repository is used for everything else?







c# asp.net-core dependency-injection asp.net-core-webapi






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 26 '18 at 8:47









Steven

128k17221337




128k17221337










asked Nov 25 '18 at 23:54









BrezelmannBrezelmann

448




448













  • use the factory delegate when registering the service

    – Nkosi
    Nov 26 '18 at 0:09






  • 1





    The CachedArticleRepository class is an implementation of the Decorator design pattern.

    – Steven
    Nov 26 '18 at 8:50



















  • use the factory delegate when registering the service

    – Nkosi
    Nov 26 '18 at 0:09






  • 1





    The CachedArticleRepository class is an implementation of the Decorator design pattern.

    – Steven
    Nov 26 '18 at 8:50

















use the factory delegate when registering the service

– Nkosi
Nov 26 '18 at 0:09





use the factory delegate when registering the service

– Nkosi
Nov 26 '18 at 0:09




1




1





The CachedArticleRepository class is an implementation of the Decorator design pattern.

– Steven
Nov 26 '18 at 8:50





The CachedArticleRepository class is an implementation of the Decorator design pattern.

– Steven
Nov 26 '18 at 8:50












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3














Use the factory delegate overload when registering the service



//...

services.AddScoped<ArticleRepository>();
services.AddScoped<IArticleRepository, CachedArticleRepository>(serviceProvider => {
IArticleRepository nonCachedVarient = serviceProvider.GetService<ArticleRepository>();
IMemoryCache cache = serviceProvider.GetService<IMemoryCache>();
return new CachedArticleRepository (nonCachedVarient, cache);
});

//...


That way the Non Cached Variant is used for building the Cached Repository and the Cached Repository is used for everything else.



The above code assumes all other dependencies are added to the service collection.



The CachedArticleRepository is registered as IArticleRepository so it will be resolved whenever that dependency is needed.



You can change the service life time to suit your needs. AddScoped was used just to demonstrate the registration process.






share|improve this answer
























  • Worked like a Charm thank you for making and saving my day (again) @Nkosi :D

    – Brezelmann
    Nov 29 '18 at 13:04











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53473199%2fstrategy-pattern-with-asp-net-core-di%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














Use the factory delegate overload when registering the service



//...

services.AddScoped<ArticleRepository>();
services.AddScoped<IArticleRepository, CachedArticleRepository>(serviceProvider => {
IArticleRepository nonCachedVarient = serviceProvider.GetService<ArticleRepository>();
IMemoryCache cache = serviceProvider.GetService<IMemoryCache>();
return new CachedArticleRepository (nonCachedVarient, cache);
});

//...


That way the Non Cached Variant is used for building the Cached Repository and the Cached Repository is used for everything else.



The above code assumes all other dependencies are added to the service collection.



The CachedArticleRepository is registered as IArticleRepository so it will be resolved whenever that dependency is needed.



You can change the service life time to suit your needs. AddScoped was used just to demonstrate the registration process.






share|improve this answer
























  • Worked like a Charm thank you for making and saving my day (again) @Nkosi :D

    – Brezelmann
    Nov 29 '18 at 13:04
















3














Use the factory delegate overload when registering the service



//...

services.AddScoped<ArticleRepository>();
services.AddScoped<IArticleRepository, CachedArticleRepository>(serviceProvider => {
IArticleRepository nonCachedVarient = serviceProvider.GetService<ArticleRepository>();
IMemoryCache cache = serviceProvider.GetService<IMemoryCache>();
return new CachedArticleRepository (nonCachedVarient, cache);
});

//...


That way the Non Cached Variant is used for building the Cached Repository and the Cached Repository is used for everything else.



The above code assumes all other dependencies are added to the service collection.



The CachedArticleRepository is registered as IArticleRepository so it will be resolved whenever that dependency is needed.



You can change the service life time to suit your needs. AddScoped was used just to demonstrate the registration process.






share|improve this answer
























  • Worked like a Charm thank you for making and saving my day (again) @Nkosi :D

    – Brezelmann
    Nov 29 '18 at 13:04














3












3








3







Use the factory delegate overload when registering the service



//...

services.AddScoped<ArticleRepository>();
services.AddScoped<IArticleRepository, CachedArticleRepository>(serviceProvider => {
IArticleRepository nonCachedVarient = serviceProvider.GetService<ArticleRepository>();
IMemoryCache cache = serviceProvider.GetService<IMemoryCache>();
return new CachedArticleRepository (nonCachedVarient, cache);
});

//...


That way the Non Cached Variant is used for building the Cached Repository and the Cached Repository is used for everything else.



The above code assumes all other dependencies are added to the service collection.



The CachedArticleRepository is registered as IArticleRepository so it will be resolved whenever that dependency is needed.



You can change the service life time to suit your needs. AddScoped was used just to demonstrate the registration process.






share|improve this answer













Use the factory delegate overload when registering the service



//...

services.AddScoped<ArticleRepository>();
services.AddScoped<IArticleRepository, CachedArticleRepository>(serviceProvider => {
IArticleRepository nonCachedVarient = serviceProvider.GetService<ArticleRepository>();
IMemoryCache cache = serviceProvider.GetService<IMemoryCache>();
return new CachedArticleRepository (nonCachedVarient, cache);
});

//...


That way the Non Cached Variant is used for building the Cached Repository and the Cached Repository is used for everything else.



The above code assumes all other dependencies are added to the service collection.



The CachedArticleRepository is registered as IArticleRepository so it will be resolved whenever that dependency is needed.



You can change the service life time to suit your needs. AddScoped was used just to demonstrate the registration process.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 26 '18 at 0:33









NkosiNkosi

119k17137201




119k17137201













  • Worked like a Charm thank you for making and saving my day (again) @Nkosi :D

    – Brezelmann
    Nov 29 '18 at 13:04



















  • Worked like a Charm thank you for making and saving my day (again) @Nkosi :D

    – Brezelmann
    Nov 29 '18 at 13:04

















Worked like a Charm thank you for making and saving my day (again) @Nkosi :D

– Brezelmann
Nov 29 '18 at 13:04





Worked like a Charm thank you for making and saving my day (again) @Nkosi :D

– Brezelmann
Nov 29 '18 at 13:04




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53473199%2fstrategy-pattern-with-asp-net-core-di%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Create new schema in PostgreSQL using DBeaver

Deepest pit of an array with Javascript: test on Codility

Costa Masnaga