How to make DebuggerDisplay work for composite types in Dictionary?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












In an attempt to pleasantly display a Dictionary's content, I wrote this:



[assembly: DebuggerDisplay("{Key,nq} -> {Value,nq}", Target = typeof(KeyValuePair<,>))]

namespace test {
[DebuggerDisplay("{DebuggerDisplay,nq}")]
public class Thing {
private readonly int _num;
public string DebuggerDisplay => $"DBG: {_num}";
public Thing(int num) => _num = num;
}

public class Program {
static void Main(string args) {
var map = new Dictionary<string,Thing> {
["Foo"] = new Thing(1),
["Bar"] = new Thing(2),
};
}
}
}


And I would've expected to see in the debugger this:



Foo -> DBG: 1
Bar -> DBG: 2


But instead I see this:



Foo -> {test.Thing}
Bar -> {test.Thing}


It's worth noting that if I expand on of the KeyValuePairs, I do see that:



Name    | Value
--------+-------
Key | "Foo"
Value | DBG: 1


So the DebuggerDisplay does work.



So the problem is how to display the content of a composite type in the main watch-list of the dictionary's content?










share|improve this question


























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    In an attempt to pleasantly display a Dictionary's content, I wrote this:



    [assembly: DebuggerDisplay("{Key,nq} -> {Value,nq}", Target = typeof(KeyValuePair<,>))]

    namespace test {
    [DebuggerDisplay("{DebuggerDisplay,nq}")]
    public class Thing {
    private readonly int _num;
    public string DebuggerDisplay => $"DBG: {_num}";
    public Thing(int num) => _num = num;
    }

    public class Program {
    static void Main(string args) {
    var map = new Dictionary<string,Thing> {
    ["Foo"] = new Thing(1),
    ["Bar"] = new Thing(2),
    };
    }
    }
    }


    And I would've expected to see in the debugger this:



    Foo -> DBG: 1
    Bar -> DBG: 2


    But instead I see this:



    Foo -> {test.Thing}
    Bar -> {test.Thing}


    It's worth noting that if I expand on of the KeyValuePairs, I do see that:



    Name    | Value
    --------+-------
    Key | "Foo"
    Value | DBG: 1


    So the DebuggerDisplay does work.



    So the problem is how to display the content of a composite type in the main watch-list of the dictionary's content?










    share|improve this question
























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      In an attempt to pleasantly display a Dictionary's content, I wrote this:



      [assembly: DebuggerDisplay("{Key,nq} -> {Value,nq}", Target = typeof(KeyValuePair<,>))]

      namespace test {
      [DebuggerDisplay("{DebuggerDisplay,nq}")]
      public class Thing {
      private readonly int _num;
      public string DebuggerDisplay => $"DBG: {_num}";
      public Thing(int num) => _num = num;
      }

      public class Program {
      static void Main(string args) {
      var map = new Dictionary<string,Thing> {
      ["Foo"] = new Thing(1),
      ["Bar"] = new Thing(2),
      };
      }
      }
      }


      And I would've expected to see in the debugger this:



      Foo -> DBG: 1
      Bar -> DBG: 2


      But instead I see this:



      Foo -> {test.Thing}
      Bar -> {test.Thing}


      It's worth noting that if I expand on of the KeyValuePairs, I do see that:



      Name    | Value
      --------+-------
      Key | "Foo"
      Value | DBG: 1


      So the DebuggerDisplay does work.



      So the problem is how to display the content of a composite type in the main watch-list of the dictionary's content?










      share|improve this question













      In an attempt to pleasantly display a Dictionary's content, I wrote this:



      [assembly: DebuggerDisplay("{Key,nq} -> {Value,nq}", Target = typeof(KeyValuePair<,>))]

      namespace test {
      [DebuggerDisplay("{DebuggerDisplay,nq}")]
      public class Thing {
      private readonly int _num;
      public string DebuggerDisplay => $"DBG: {_num}";
      public Thing(int num) => _num = num;
      }

      public class Program {
      static void Main(string args) {
      var map = new Dictionary<string,Thing> {
      ["Foo"] = new Thing(1),
      ["Bar"] = new Thing(2),
      };
      }
      }
      }


      And I would've expected to see in the debugger this:



      Foo -> DBG: 1
      Bar -> DBG: 2


      But instead I see this:



      Foo -> {test.Thing}
      Bar -> {test.Thing}


      It's worth noting that if I expand on of the KeyValuePairs, I do see that:



      Name    | Value
      --------+-------
      Key | "Foo"
      Value | DBG: 1


      So the DebuggerDisplay does work.



      So the problem is how to display the content of a composite type in the main watch-list of the dictionary's content?







      c# visual-studio-debugging debuggerdisplay






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 18 at 14:20









      Tar

      3,13163377




      3,13163377
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Though nested evaluation of DebuggerDisplay does not work it is actually flexible enough to call any custom formatting method with parameters. So I would do it like this:



          [assembly:DebuggerDisplay("{Key,nq} -> {MyNamespace.DebugHelper.DisplayValue(this.Value),nq}", Target = typeof(KeyValuePair<,>))]


          Where debug helper can be an internal helper class:



          internal static class DebugHelper
          {
          internal static string DisplayValue(object value)
          {
          switch (value)
          {
          case Thing thing:
          return thing.DebuggerDisplay; // or even better just to format it here
          default:
          return value.ToString();
          }
          }
          }





          share|improve this answer





















            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53361883%2fhow-to-make-debuggerdisplay-work-for-composite-types-in-dictionary%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            2
            down vote



            accepted










            Though nested evaluation of DebuggerDisplay does not work it is actually flexible enough to call any custom formatting method with parameters. So I would do it like this:



            [assembly:DebuggerDisplay("{Key,nq} -> {MyNamespace.DebugHelper.DisplayValue(this.Value),nq}", Target = typeof(KeyValuePair<,>))]


            Where debug helper can be an internal helper class:



            internal static class DebugHelper
            {
            internal static string DisplayValue(object value)
            {
            switch (value)
            {
            case Thing thing:
            return thing.DebuggerDisplay; // or even better just to format it here
            default:
            return value.ToString();
            }
            }
            }





            share|improve this answer

























              up vote
              2
              down vote



              accepted










              Though nested evaluation of DebuggerDisplay does not work it is actually flexible enough to call any custom formatting method with parameters. So I would do it like this:



              [assembly:DebuggerDisplay("{Key,nq} -> {MyNamespace.DebugHelper.DisplayValue(this.Value),nq}", Target = typeof(KeyValuePair<,>))]


              Where debug helper can be an internal helper class:



              internal static class DebugHelper
              {
              internal static string DisplayValue(object value)
              {
              switch (value)
              {
              case Thing thing:
              return thing.DebuggerDisplay; // or even better just to format it here
              default:
              return value.ToString();
              }
              }
              }





              share|improve this answer























                up vote
                2
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                2
                down vote



                accepted






                Though nested evaluation of DebuggerDisplay does not work it is actually flexible enough to call any custom formatting method with parameters. So I would do it like this:



                [assembly:DebuggerDisplay("{Key,nq} -> {MyNamespace.DebugHelper.DisplayValue(this.Value),nq}", Target = typeof(KeyValuePair<,>))]


                Where debug helper can be an internal helper class:



                internal static class DebugHelper
                {
                internal static string DisplayValue(object value)
                {
                switch (value)
                {
                case Thing thing:
                return thing.DebuggerDisplay; // or even better just to format it here
                default:
                return value.ToString();
                }
                }
                }





                share|improve this answer












                Though nested evaluation of DebuggerDisplay does not work it is actually flexible enough to call any custom formatting method with parameters. So I would do it like this:



                [assembly:DebuggerDisplay("{Key,nq} -> {MyNamespace.DebugHelper.DisplayValue(this.Value),nq}", Target = typeof(KeyValuePair<,>))]


                Where debug helper can be an internal helper class:



                internal static class DebugHelper
                {
                internal static string DisplayValue(object value)
                {
                switch (value)
                {
                case Thing thing:
                return thing.DebuggerDisplay; // or even better just to format it here
                default:
                return value.ToString();
                }
                }
                }






                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Nov 18 at 17:09









                taffer

                7,92021536




                7,92021536






























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded



















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53361883%2fhow-to-make-debuggerdisplay-work-for-composite-types-in-dictionary%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Create new schema in PostgreSQL using DBeaver

                    Deepest pit of an array with Javascript: test on Codility

                    Costa Masnaga