Why is neutron slightly heavier than the proton?
With latest knowledge of QCD, is there any explanation for why the neutron is slightly heavier than the proton? Can it be boiled down to a simple formula?
mass standard-model neutrons protons isospin-symmetry
edited 1 hour ago
Qmechanic♦
101k121831144
asked 3 hours ago
zooby
1,233514
|
show 2 more comments
With latest knowledge of QCD, is there any explanation for why the neutron is slightly heavier than the proton? Can it be boiled down to a simple formula?
mass standard-model neutrons protons isospin-symmetry
edited 1 hour ago
Qmechanic♦
101k121831144
asked 3 hours ago
zooby
1,233514
Are you asking for a complete and proven rigorous explanation? Or will "the different valence quark combinations interact with the QCD vacuum in different ways, which produces states with different energies, as has been demonstrated using lattice QCD" be sufficient?
– probably_someone
3 hours ago
"Different valence quark makeups" - proton is uud, neutron is udd. "Interact with the QCD vacuum in different ways" - since the interactions are non-perturbative at these energies, there's not a whole lot more I can say here.
– probably_someone
3 hours ago
2
Frankly, if you aren't up to speed on the differences between the particles in the constituent quark model, there is no real meaning to asking about the "latest knowledge of QCD": the answer will rely on things you don't (yet) understand.
– dmckee♦
3 hours ago
Well everyone knows a proton is uud and neutron is ddu. But the mass differences in quarks doesn't explain the N/P mass difference. I mean if the only way to calculate the difference is computer simulations then that means humans don't really know why. Or at least it is beyond human understanding.
– zooby
3 hours ago
1
If protons were heavier than neutrons then protons would decay. The universe would be very different if hydrogen were unstable. I guess the only kind of stars would be neutron stars, and complex atoms wouldn't be produced.
– PM 2Ring
2 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
With latest knowledge of QCD, is there any explanation for why the neutron is slightly heavier than the proton? Can it be boiled down to a simple formula?
mass standard-model neutrons protons isospin-symmetry
edited 1 hour ago
Qmechanic♦
101k121831144
asked 3 hours ago
zooby
1,233514
With latest knowledge of QCD, is there any explanation for why the neutron is slightly heavier than the proton? Can it be boiled down to a simple formula?
mass standard-model neutrons protons isospin-symmetry
mass standard-model neutrons protons isospin-symmetry
edited 1 hour ago
Qmechanic♦
101k121831144
asked 3 hours ago
zooby
1,233514
edited 1 hour ago
Qmechanic♦
101k121831144
asked 3 hours ago
zooby
1,233514
edited 1 hour ago
Qmechanic♦
101k121831144
edited 1 hour ago
Qmechanic♦
101k121831144
edited 1 hour ago
Qmechanic♦
101k121831144
101k121831144
asked 3 hours ago
zooby
1,233514
asked 3 hours ago
zooby
1,233514
asked 3 hours ago
zooby
1,233514
1,233514
Are you asking for a complete and proven rigorous explanation? Or will "the different valence quark combinations interact with the QCD vacuum in different ways, which produces states with different energies, as has been demonstrated using lattice QCD" be sufficient?
– probably_someone
3 hours ago
"Different valence quark makeups" - proton is uud, neutron is udd. "Interact with the QCD vacuum in different ways" - since the interactions are non-perturbative at these energies, there's not a whole lot more I can say here.
– probably_someone
3 hours ago
2
Frankly, if you aren't up to speed on the differences between the particles in the constituent quark model, there is no real meaning to asking about the "latest knowledge of QCD": the answer will rely on things you don't (yet) understand.
– dmckee♦
3 hours ago
Well everyone knows a proton is uud and neutron is ddu. But the mass differences in quarks doesn't explain the N/P mass difference. I mean if the only way to calculate the difference is computer simulations then that means humans don't really know why. Or at least it is beyond human understanding.
– zooby
3 hours ago
1
If protons were heavier than neutrons then protons would decay. The universe would be very different if hydrogen were unstable. I guess the only kind of stars would be neutron stars, and complex atoms wouldn't be produced.
– PM 2Ring
2 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Are you asking for a complete and proven rigorous explanation? Or will "the different valence quark combinations interact with the QCD vacuum in different ways, which produces states with different energies, as has been demonstrated using lattice QCD" be sufficient?
– probably_someone
3 hours ago
"Different valence quark makeups" - proton is uud, neutron is udd. "Interact with the QCD vacuum in different ways" - since the interactions are non-perturbative at these energies, there's not a whole lot more I can say here.
– probably_someone
3 hours ago
2
Frankly, if you aren't up to speed on the differences between the particles in the constituent quark model, there is no real meaning to asking about the "latest knowledge of QCD": the answer will rely on things you don't (yet) understand.
– dmckee♦
3 hours ago
Well everyone knows a proton is uud and neutron is ddu. But the mass differences in quarks doesn't explain the N/P mass difference. I mean if the only way to calculate the difference is computer simulations then that means humans don't really know why. Or at least it is beyond human understanding.
– zooby
3 hours ago
1
If protons were heavier than neutrons then protons would decay. The universe would be very different if hydrogen were unstable. I guess the only kind of stars would be neutron stars, and complex atoms wouldn't be produced.
– PM 2Ring
2 hours ago
Are you asking for a complete and proven rigorous explanation? Or will "the different valence quark combinations interact with the QCD vacuum in different ways, which produces states with different energies, as has been demonstrated using lattice QCD" be sufficient?
– probably_someone
3 hours ago
Are you asking for a complete and proven rigorous explanation? Or will "the different valence quark combinations interact with the QCD vacuum in different ways, which produces states with different energies, as has been demonstrated using lattice QCD" be sufficient?
– probably_someone
3 hours ago
"Different valence quark makeups" - proton is uud, neutron is udd. "Interact with the QCD vacuum in different ways" - since the interactions are non-perturbative at these energies, there's not a whole lot more I can say here.
– probably_someone
3 hours ago
"Different valence quark makeups" - proton is uud, neutron is udd. "Interact with the QCD vacuum in different ways" - since the interactions are non-perturbative at these energies, there's not a whole lot more I can say here.
– probably_someone
3 hours ago
2
2
Frankly, if you aren't up to speed on the differences between the particles in the constituent quark model, there is no real meaning to asking about the "latest knowledge of QCD": the answer will rely on things you don't (yet) understand.
– dmckee♦
3 hours ago
Frankly, if you aren't up to speed on the differences between the particles in the constituent quark model, there is no real meaning to asking about the "latest knowledge of QCD": the answer will rely on things you don't (yet) understand.
– dmckee♦
3 hours ago
Well everyone knows a proton is uud and neutron is ddu. But the mass differences in quarks doesn't explain the N/P mass difference. I mean if the only way to calculate the difference is computer simulations then that means humans don't really know why. Or at least it is beyond human understanding.
– zooby
3 hours ago
Well everyone knows a proton is uud and neutron is ddu. But the mass differences in quarks doesn't explain the N/P mass difference. I mean if the only way to calculate the difference is computer simulations then that means humans don't really know why. Or at least it is beyond human understanding.
– zooby
3 hours ago
1
1
If protons were heavier than neutrons then protons would decay. The universe would be very different if hydrogen were unstable. I guess the only kind of stars would be neutron stars, and complex atoms wouldn't be produced.
– PM 2Ring
2 hours ago
If protons were heavier than neutrons then protons would decay. The universe would be very different if hydrogen were unstable. I guess the only kind of stars would be neutron stars, and complex atoms wouldn't be produced.
– PM 2Ring
2 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
There is an easy partial answer to the question. The proton is (uud) and the neutron is (udd). The up quark is 2.2MeV and the down quark is 4.7MeV. So there is a 2.5MeV mass increase with the neutron. The proton is 938.272MeV and the neutron is 939.565MeV which is then 1.293MeV heavier. That is odd! The neutron has a smaller mass difference than just based on quark masses.
The complete answer is a massively difficult problem. The QCD gauge bosons or gluons are self-trapped so that while they have no mass their self-interaction confines then and their energy in a form of mass. In fact this is majority of mass in hadrons and baryons. This forms the basis of the mass-gap problem. Lattice gauge theory on computers has shed some light on this and predicted the mass of baryons pretty well. An exact math-physics answer is waiting in the wings, and ClayMath as a million dollar prize for an answer. With the proton there is more of a mass-gap due to interactions with gluons. Also the proton being charged may have some renormalized mass correction just from QED that off sets the increase in mass just from quarks.
answered 2 hours ago
Lawrence B. Crowell
10.9k11024
I've just thought if all quarks had the same average momentum, then they're energy differences would be smaller than their rest energy differences. I wonder if that has something to do with it.
– zooby
48 mins ago
add a comment |
For years the expected explanation has been, that a strong-force contribution to the mass difference, that originates in the mass difference between down and up quarks, outweighs the electromagnetic contribution to the mass difference.
There were two theory papers on this theme, earlier this year 1 2. The mechanism I get from skimming them, is that the eta meson mixes with the neutral pion (see first paper, page 7), and then the pion interacts with the omega meson (see second paper, end of introduction). That is, I think these are the specific interactions which produce the strong-force contribution to the nucleon mass difference.
answered 54 mins ago
Mitchell Porter
7,38111243
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f450744%2fwhy-is-neutron-slightly-heavier-than-the-proton%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There is an easy partial answer to the question. The proton is (uud) and the neutron is (udd). The up quark is 2.2MeV and the down quark is 4.7MeV. So there is a 2.5MeV mass increase with the neutron. The proton is 938.272MeV and the neutron is 939.565MeV which is then 1.293MeV heavier. That is odd! The neutron has a smaller mass difference than just based on quark masses.
The complete answer is a massively difficult problem. The QCD gauge bosons or gluons are self-trapped so that while they have no mass their self-interaction confines then and their energy in a form of mass. In fact this is majority of mass in hadrons and baryons. This forms the basis of the mass-gap problem. Lattice gauge theory on computers has shed some light on this and predicted the mass of baryons pretty well. An exact math-physics answer is waiting in the wings, and ClayMath as a million dollar prize for an answer. With the proton there is more of a mass-gap due to interactions with gluons. Also the proton being charged may have some renormalized mass correction just from QED that off sets the increase in mass just from quarks.
answered 2 hours ago
Lawrence B. Crowell
10.9k11024
I've just thought if all quarks had the same average momentum, then they're energy differences would be smaller than their rest energy differences. I wonder if that has something to do with it.
– zooby
48 mins ago
add a comment |
There is an easy partial answer to the question. The proton is (uud) and the neutron is (udd). The up quark is 2.2MeV and the down quark is 4.7MeV. So there is a 2.5MeV mass increase with the neutron. The proton is 938.272MeV and the neutron is 939.565MeV which is then 1.293MeV heavier. That is odd! The neutron has a smaller mass difference than just based on quark masses.
The complete answer is a massively difficult problem. The QCD gauge bosons or gluons are self-trapped so that while they have no mass their self-interaction confines then and their energy in a form of mass. In fact this is majority of mass in hadrons and baryons. This forms the basis of the mass-gap problem. Lattice gauge theory on computers has shed some light on this and predicted the mass of baryons pretty well. An exact math-physics answer is waiting in the wings, and ClayMath as a million dollar prize for an answer. With the proton there is more of a mass-gap due to interactions with gluons. Also the proton being charged may have some renormalized mass correction just from QED that off sets the increase in mass just from quarks.
answered 2 hours ago
Lawrence B. Crowell
10.9k11024
I've just thought if all quarks had the same average momentum, then they're energy differences would be smaller than their rest energy differences. I wonder if that has something to do with it.
– zooby
48 mins ago
add a comment |
There is an easy partial answer to the question. The proton is (uud) and the neutron is (udd). The up quark is 2.2MeV and the down quark is 4.7MeV. So there is a 2.5MeV mass increase with the neutron. The proton is 938.272MeV and the neutron is 939.565MeV which is then 1.293MeV heavier. That is odd! The neutron has a smaller mass difference than just based on quark masses.
The complete answer is a massively difficult problem. The QCD gauge bosons or gluons are self-trapped so that while they have no mass their self-interaction confines then and their energy in a form of mass. In fact this is majority of mass in hadrons and baryons. This forms the basis of the mass-gap problem. Lattice gauge theory on computers has shed some light on this and predicted the mass of baryons pretty well. An exact math-physics answer is waiting in the wings, and ClayMath as a million dollar prize for an answer. With the proton there is more of a mass-gap due to interactions with gluons. Also the proton being charged may have some renormalized mass correction just from QED that off sets the increase in mass just from quarks.
answered 2 hours ago
Lawrence B. Crowell
10.9k11024
There is an easy partial answer to the question. The proton is (uud) and the neutron is (udd). The up quark is 2.2MeV and the down quark is 4.7MeV. So there is a 2.5MeV mass increase with the neutron. The proton is 938.272MeV and the neutron is 939.565MeV which is then 1.293MeV heavier. That is odd! The neutron has a smaller mass difference than just based on quark masses.
The complete answer is a massively difficult problem. The QCD gauge bosons or gluons are self-trapped so that while they have no mass their self-interaction confines then and their energy in a form of mass. In fact this is majority of mass in hadrons and baryons. This forms the basis of the mass-gap problem. Lattice gauge theory on computers has shed some light on this and predicted the mass of baryons pretty well. An exact math-physics answer is waiting in the wings, and ClayMath as a million dollar prize for an answer. With the proton there is more of a mass-gap due to interactions with gluons. Also the proton being charged may have some renormalized mass correction just from QED that off sets the increase in mass just from quarks.
answered 2 hours ago
Lawrence B. Crowell
10.9k11024
answered 2 hours ago
Lawrence B. Crowell
10.9k11024
answered 2 hours ago
Lawrence B. Crowell
10.9k11024
answered 2 hours ago
Lawrence B. Crowell
10.9k11024
10.9k11024
I've just thought if all quarks had the same average momentum, then they're energy differences would be smaller than their rest energy differences. I wonder if that has something to do with it.
– zooby
48 mins ago
add a comment |
I've just thought if all quarks had the same average momentum, then they're energy differences would be smaller than their rest energy differences. I wonder if that has something to do with it.
– zooby
48 mins ago
I've just thought if all quarks had the same average momentum, then they're energy differences would be smaller than their rest energy differences. I wonder if that has something to do with it.
– zooby
48 mins ago
I've just thought if all quarks had the same average momentum, then they're energy differences would be smaller than their rest energy differences. I wonder if that has something to do with it.
– zooby
48 mins ago
add a comment |
For years the expected explanation has been, that a strong-force contribution to the mass difference, that originates in the mass difference between down and up quarks, outweighs the electromagnetic contribution to the mass difference.
There were two theory papers on this theme, earlier this year 1 2. The mechanism I get from skimming them, is that the eta meson mixes with the neutral pion (see first paper, page 7), and then the pion interacts with the omega meson (see second paper, end of introduction). That is, I think these are the specific interactions which produce the strong-force contribution to the nucleon mass difference.
answered 54 mins ago
Mitchell Porter
7,38111243
add a comment |
For years the expected explanation has been, that a strong-force contribution to the mass difference, that originates in the mass difference between down and up quarks, outweighs the electromagnetic contribution to the mass difference.
There were two theory papers on this theme, earlier this year 1 2. The mechanism I get from skimming them, is that the eta meson mixes with the neutral pion (see first paper, page 7), and then the pion interacts with the omega meson (see second paper, end of introduction). That is, I think these are the specific interactions which produce the strong-force contribution to the nucleon mass difference.
answered 54 mins ago
Mitchell Porter
7,38111243
add a comment |
For years the expected explanation has been, that a strong-force contribution to the mass difference, that originates in the mass difference between down and up quarks, outweighs the electromagnetic contribution to the mass difference.
There were two theory papers on this theme, earlier this year 1 2. The mechanism I get from skimming them, is that the eta meson mixes with the neutral pion (see first paper, page 7), and then the pion interacts with the omega meson (see second paper, end of introduction). That is, I think these are the specific interactions which produce the strong-force contribution to the nucleon mass difference.
answered 54 mins ago
Mitchell Porter
7,38111243
For years the expected explanation has been, that a strong-force contribution to the mass difference, that originates in the mass difference between down and up quarks, outweighs the electromagnetic contribution to the mass difference.
There were two theory papers on this theme, earlier this year 1 2. The mechanism I get from skimming them, is that the eta meson mixes with the neutral pion (see first paper, page 7), and then the pion interacts with the omega meson (see second paper, end of introduction). That is, I think these are the specific interactions which produce the strong-force contribution to the nucleon mass difference.
answered 54 mins ago
Mitchell Porter
7,38111243
answered 54 mins ago
Mitchell Porter
7,38111243
answered 54 mins ago
Mitchell Porter
7,38111243
answered 54 mins ago
Mitchell Porter
7,38111243
7,38111243
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f450744%2fwhy-is-neutron-slightly-heavier-than-the-proton%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Are you asking for a complete and proven rigorous explanation? Or will "the different valence quark combinations interact with the QCD vacuum in different ways, which produces states with different energies, as has been demonstrated using lattice QCD" be sufficient?
– probably_someone
3 hours ago
"Different valence quark makeups" - proton is uud, neutron is udd. "Interact with the QCD vacuum in different ways" - since the interactions are non-perturbative at these energies, there's not a whole lot more I can say here.
– probably_someone
3 hours ago
2
Frankly, if you aren't up to speed on the differences between the particles in the constituent quark model, there is no real meaning to asking about the "latest knowledge of QCD": the answer will rely on things you don't (yet) understand.
– dmckee♦
3 hours ago
Well everyone knows a proton is uud and neutron is ddu. But the mass differences in quarks doesn't explain the N/P mass difference. I mean if the only way to calculate the difference is computer simulations then that means humans don't really know why. Or at least it is beyond human understanding.
– zooby
3 hours ago
1
If protons were heavier than neutrons then protons would decay. The universe would be very different if hydrogen were unstable. I guess the only kind of stars would be neutron stars, and complex atoms wouldn't be produced.
– PM 2Ring
2 hours ago