How can I create a mechanism for natural reproductive control in males?











up vote
7
down vote

favorite
3












Ejaculation is the discharge of semen from the male reproductory tract, usually accompanied by orgasm. It is the final stage and natural objective of male sexual stimulation, and an essential component of natural conception. Despite this, "dry" orgasms do occasionally happen. This occurs when the final stage is reached with no actual discharge due to the testes having run out of juice.



This species of humanoid is similar to baseline homo sapiens, with a few key differences. I would like to design a mechanism for voluntary control over the discharge of semen, like an on or off switch that can be activated at will. This would be meant to be a natural and foolproof form of birth control and eliminate the occurrence of unwanted conceptions.



How can I make this possible?










share|improve this question




















  • 5




    fullproof Any number of medical conditions would likely make your mechanism fail. There would still be a need for contraception. Also note that sex (if done correctly) is distracting, and relying on a conscious thought to activate or deactivate the production or non-production of semen would be hopelessly prone to error.
    – StephenG
    yesterday






  • 3




    Human sexuality is fundamental to the perpetuation and survival of the species. From a remarkably sociopathic point of view, who would want the hassle of raising children if the drive to create them were not to great and (*cough*) entertaining? Though you'll get answers without this request for clarification, what is the evolutionary drive for perpetuation in your species, since that appears at this point to be replaced with the word, "meh"?
    – JBH
    yesterday






  • 5




    @StephenG, I'm not an evolutionary biologist, but I wouldn't be surprised if one explained that our perception of entertainment is a natural consequence of the evolutionary drive toward reproduction. In other words, we interpret the action as entertaining when in reality we're driven (forced, wired) to it in the same way we find food enjoyable because we're driven to eat. After all, what is pleasure but a reaction to doing what we're wired to do and pain a reaction to doing things we're wired not to do? (And if that answer isn't a 250-page PhD dissertation, I don't know what is.)
    – JBH
    yesterday








  • 5




    Evolution is going to undermine any attempt, any malewho accidentally inseminates a female is going to have a distinct evolutionary advantage.
    – John
    yesterday








  • 1




    If you are just concerned with population control has you considered having an real estrus period unlike the 24/7 system human use. This is one of the things keeping chimp populations low. Its an easily lost adaptation however.
    – John
    yesterday















up vote
7
down vote

favorite
3












Ejaculation is the discharge of semen from the male reproductory tract, usually accompanied by orgasm. It is the final stage and natural objective of male sexual stimulation, and an essential component of natural conception. Despite this, "dry" orgasms do occasionally happen. This occurs when the final stage is reached with no actual discharge due to the testes having run out of juice.



This species of humanoid is similar to baseline homo sapiens, with a few key differences. I would like to design a mechanism for voluntary control over the discharge of semen, like an on or off switch that can be activated at will. This would be meant to be a natural and foolproof form of birth control and eliminate the occurrence of unwanted conceptions.



How can I make this possible?










share|improve this question




















  • 5




    fullproof Any number of medical conditions would likely make your mechanism fail. There would still be a need for contraception. Also note that sex (if done correctly) is distracting, and relying on a conscious thought to activate or deactivate the production or non-production of semen would be hopelessly prone to error.
    – StephenG
    yesterday






  • 3




    Human sexuality is fundamental to the perpetuation and survival of the species. From a remarkably sociopathic point of view, who would want the hassle of raising children if the drive to create them were not to great and (*cough*) entertaining? Though you'll get answers without this request for clarification, what is the evolutionary drive for perpetuation in your species, since that appears at this point to be replaced with the word, "meh"?
    – JBH
    yesterday






  • 5




    @StephenG, I'm not an evolutionary biologist, but I wouldn't be surprised if one explained that our perception of entertainment is a natural consequence of the evolutionary drive toward reproduction. In other words, we interpret the action as entertaining when in reality we're driven (forced, wired) to it in the same way we find food enjoyable because we're driven to eat. After all, what is pleasure but a reaction to doing what we're wired to do and pain a reaction to doing things we're wired not to do? (And if that answer isn't a 250-page PhD dissertation, I don't know what is.)
    – JBH
    yesterday








  • 5




    Evolution is going to undermine any attempt, any malewho accidentally inseminates a female is going to have a distinct evolutionary advantage.
    – John
    yesterday








  • 1




    If you are just concerned with population control has you considered having an real estrus period unlike the 24/7 system human use. This is one of the things keeping chimp populations low. Its an easily lost adaptation however.
    – John
    yesterday













up vote
7
down vote

favorite
3









up vote
7
down vote

favorite
3






3





Ejaculation is the discharge of semen from the male reproductory tract, usually accompanied by orgasm. It is the final stage and natural objective of male sexual stimulation, and an essential component of natural conception. Despite this, "dry" orgasms do occasionally happen. This occurs when the final stage is reached with no actual discharge due to the testes having run out of juice.



This species of humanoid is similar to baseline homo sapiens, with a few key differences. I would like to design a mechanism for voluntary control over the discharge of semen, like an on or off switch that can be activated at will. This would be meant to be a natural and foolproof form of birth control and eliminate the occurrence of unwanted conceptions.



How can I make this possible?










share|improve this question















Ejaculation is the discharge of semen from the male reproductory tract, usually accompanied by orgasm. It is the final stage and natural objective of male sexual stimulation, and an essential component of natural conception. Despite this, "dry" orgasms do occasionally happen. This occurs when the final stage is reached with no actual discharge due to the testes having run out of juice.



This species of humanoid is similar to baseline homo sapiens, with a few key differences. I would like to design a mechanism for voluntary control over the discharge of semen, like an on or off switch that can be activated at will. This would be meant to be a natural and foolproof form of birth control and eliminate the occurrence of unwanted conceptions.



How can I make this possible?







science-based biology






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 9 hours ago









Kat

1847




1847










asked yesterday









Incognito

3,87853655




3,87853655








  • 5




    fullproof Any number of medical conditions would likely make your mechanism fail. There would still be a need for contraception. Also note that sex (if done correctly) is distracting, and relying on a conscious thought to activate or deactivate the production or non-production of semen would be hopelessly prone to error.
    – StephenG
    yesterday






  • 3




    Human sexuality is fundamental to the perpetuation and survival of the species. From a remarkably sociopathic point of view, who would want the hassle of raising children if the drive to create them were not to great and (*cough*) entertaining? Though you'll get answers without this request for clarification, what is the evolutionary drive for perpetuation in your species, since that appears at this point to be replaced with the word, "meh"?
    – JBH
    yesterday






  • 5




    @StephenG, I'm not an evolutionary biologist, but I wouldn't be surprised if one explained that our perception of entertainment is a natural consequence of the evolutionary drive toward reproduction. In other words, we interpret the action as entertaining when in reality we're driven (forced, wired) to it in the same way we find food enjoyable because we're driven to eat. After all, what is pleasure but a reaction to doing what we're wired to do and pain a reaction to doing things we're wired not to do? (And if that answer isn't a 250-page PhD dissertation, I don't know what is.)
    – JBH
    yesterday








  • 5




    Evolution is going to undermine any attempt, any malewho accidentally inseminates a female is going to have a distinct evolutionary advantage.
    – John
    yesterday








  • 1




    If you are just concerned with population control has you considered having an real estrus period unlike the 24/7 system human use. This is one of the things keeping chimp populations low. Its an easily lost adaptation however.
    – John
    yesterday














  • 5




    fullproof Any number of medical conditions would likely make your mechanism fail. There would still be a need for contraception. Also note that sex (if done correctly) is distracting, and relying on a conscious thought to activate or deactivate the production or non-production of semen would be hopelessly prone to error.
    – StephenG
    yesterday






  • 3




    Human sexuality is fundamental to the perpetuation and survival of the species. From a remarkably sociopathic point of view, who would want the hassle of raising children if the drive to create them were not to great and (*cough*) entertaining? Though you'll get answers without this request for clarification, what is the evolutionary drive for perpetuation in your species, since that appears at this point to be replaced with the word, "meh"?
    – JBH
    yesterday






  • 5




    @StephenG, I'm not an evolutionary biologist, but I wouldn't be surprised if one explained that our perception of entertainment is a natural consequence of the evolutionary drive toward reproduction. In other words, we interpret the action as entertaining when in reality we're driven (forced, wired) to it in the same way we find food enjoyable because we're driven to eat. After all, what is pleasure but a reaction to doing what we're wired to do and pain a reaction to doing things we're wired not to do? (And if that answer isn't a 250-page PhD dissertation, I don't know what is.)
    – JBH
    yesterday








  • 5




    Evolution is going to undermine any attempt, any malewho accidentally inseminates a female is going to have a distinct evolutionary advantage.
    – John
    yesterday








  • 1




    If you are just concerned with population control has you considered having an real estrus period unlike the 24/7 system human use. This is one of the things keeping chimp populations low. Its an easily lost adaptation however.
    – John
    yesterday








5




5




fullproof Any number of medical conditions would likely make your mechanism fail. There would still be a need for contraception. Also note that sex (if done correctly) is distracting, and relying on a conscious thought to activate or deactivate the production or non-production of semen would be hopelessly prone to error.
– StephenG
yesterday




fullproof Any number of medical conditions would likely make your mechanism fail. There would still be a need for contraception. Also note that sex (if done correctly) is distracting, and relying on a conscious thought to activate or deactivate the production or non-production of semen would be hopelessly prone to error.
– StephenG
yesterday




3




3




Human sexuality is fundamental to the perpetuation and survival of the species. From a remarkably sociopathic point of view, who would want the hassle of raising children if the drive to create them were not to great and (*cough*) entertaining? Though you'll get answers without this request for clarification, what is the evolutionary drive for perpetuation in your species, since that appears at this point to be replaced with the word, "meh"?
– JBH
yesterday




Human sexuality is fundamental to the perpetuation and survival of the species. From a remarkably sociopathic point of view, who would want the hassle of raising children if the drive to create them were not to great and (*cough*) entertaining? Though you'll get answers without this request for clarification, what is the evolutionary drive for perpetuation in your species, since that appears at this point to be replaced with the word, "meh"?
– JBH
yesterday




5




5




@StephenG, I'm not an evolutionary biologist, but I wouldn't be surprised if one explained that our perception of entertainment is a natural consequence of the evolutionary drive toward reproduction. In other words, we interpret the action as entertaining when in reality we're driven (forced, wired) to it in the same way we find food enjoyable because we're driven to eat. After all, what is pleasure but a reaction to doing what we're wired to do and pain a reaction to doing things we're wired not to do? (And if that answer isn't a 250-page PhD dissertation, I don't know what is.)
– JBH
yesterday






@StephenG, I'm not an evolutionary biologist, but I wouldn't be surprised if one explained that our perception of entertainment is a natural consequence of the evolutionary drive toward reproduction. In other words, we interpret the action as entertaining when in reality we're driven (forced, wired) to it in the same way we find food enjoyable because we're driven to eat. After all, what is pleasure but a reaction to doing what we're wired to do and pain a reaction to doing things we're wired not to do? (And if that answer isn't a 250-page PhD dissertation, I don't know what is.)
– JBH
yesterday






5




5




Evolution is going to undermine any attempt, any malewho accidentally inseminates a female is going to have a distinct evolutionary advantage.
– John
yesterday






Evolution is going to undermine any attempt, any malewho accidentally inseminates a female is going to have a distinct evolutionary advantage.
– John
yesterday






1




1




If you are just concerned with population control has you considered having an real estrus period unlike the 24/7 system human use. This is one of the things keeping chimp populations low. Its an easily lost adaptation however.
– John
yesterday




If you are just concerned with population control has you considered having an real estrus period unlike the 24/7 system human use. This is one of the things keeping chimp populations low. Its an easily lost adaptation however.
– John
yesterday










9 Answers
9






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
30
down vote













Abstinence



Not having sex is a "voluntary control over the discharge of semen." It is also a "natural and foolproof form of birth control and eliminate[s] the occurrence of unwanted conceptions." If you don't have sex, you won't have kids.






share|improve this answer

















  • 10




    This answers the letter of the question, but not the spirit. It should be a comment, not an Answer.
    – Beta
    yesterday






  • 4




    @Beta, I disagree. Frame challenges are a time-honored tradition on this site, and Kingledion is a master at answering the letter of the question while challenging its spirit. I could wish that all answers were this elegant.
    – JBH
    yesterday








  • 1




    @Beta I think this answer points out that the mechanism requested by the OP is highly redundant. From a science-based basis, there is no need to develop a biologically expensive mechanism to reproduce (pun!) something that is already a feature of all creatures that reproduce sexually.
    – kingledion
    yesterday






  • 2




    Of course you can't be using humans, or even likely primates, abstinence fails horribly in humans because the human brain is built to as incompatible with abstinence as possible.
    – John
    yesterday






  • 1




    @Rekesoft The point is, the smallest baseline change is to make abstinence more effective, not to introduce some other biologically expensive mechanism. But, effective abstinence would not make much sense evolutionarily, neither would a mechanism in the testes to prevent ejaculation.
    – kingledion
    13 hours ago


















up vote
13
down vote













You can you go two ways, I think.



Way 1:



Sperm production follow a periodic cycle, roughly like egg production in the female does. This means that only intercourse during the right moment will be fertile, any other time will be non fertile. To prevent extinction of course you need a synchronization of female and male periods.



Way 2:



The male has to consciously decide for emitting semen, something along the line of the western interpretation of tantric sex. A muscular contraction at the right moment can simply stop the seminal emission.






share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    9
    down vote













    Retrograde ejaculation




    Retrograde ejaculation occurs when semen which would, in most cases,
    be ejaculated via the urethra is redirected to the urinary bladder.
    Normally, the sphincter of the bladder contracts before ejaculation
    forcing the semen to exit via the urethra, the path of least
    resistance. When the bladder sphincter does not function properly,
    retrograde ejaculation may occur. It can also be induced deliberately
    by a male as a primitive form of male birth control (known as coitus
    saxonicus) or as part of certain alternative medicine practices.




    You want some deal where the men can fulfill their culturo-evolutionary imperative to have lots of sex, but shortcircuit the fitness benefit that it historically provided. That will work until mutant men who can't do the short-circuit overwhelm the population with their progeny.



    But in the short term, your men can be yogi masters (if that was not already the case) with conscious control over the bladder sphincter. Sex occurs normally, with the ejaculate captured in the bladder to be voided against a tree at some later time. Out of distaste for banality, I hope you make these men and their partners be capable of all sorts of other yoga sex tricks too.






    share|improve this answer





















    • Exactly how was this consciously achieved
      – anon
      9 hours ago


















    up vote
    4
    down vote













    Intelligence has allowed mankind to thrive, and your humanoids might have evolved it out of a necessity.



    First option: disease. We already have a common disease that has a ludicrous chance to kill an unborn child. Biology found a solution: kissing. By kissing you exchange saliva and if the man has the disease he'll infect the woman. By the time the disease becomes dangerous to the baby the woman has created an immune response and the baby is safe. Now imagine a disease that primarily lives in the reproductive organs and the man will have an idea when he's infected during sex. The disease works like the flu and changes each year, so you dont stay immune. If the disease survives long enough to have a high chance of killing the child the man can choose not to ejaculate but continue sex normally to both increase the chance of infecting the woman and give her time to become immune and for the social benefits of sex.



    The second and more elaborate option: Imagine a world where there are large stretches of time where unborn children and babies have almost 100% chance of dying. Its a waste of time, energy and potential children as you need to recover after a failed attempt. If these stretches of time are happening at predictable intervals biology would simply adapt the cycles to those intervals. If they arent predictable only two solutions remain: Make sure your biology can create children at a rapid pace or become intelligent enough to learn all the signs when children wont be viable. For potenial comments like "biology would learn the signs of the event and not need intelligence" there would need to be several events that seperately may not cause death in the babies but combined would cause that death.



    Sex would still be used as a social interaction between the man and woman in those times children shouldnt be born, but to ensure no babies are born the man would prevent ejaculation.






    share|improve this answer





















    • In the second scenario, there would be more selection pressure on females than males. So the females would adapt to be infertile during the dangerous seasons (with or without conscious volition), and the selection pressure on the males would vanish.
      – Beta
      yesterday










    • @Beta that would be assuming that these are actual seasons rather than events of different time length and unpredictable starting periods. Otherwise you would be absolutely right. Even so evolution isnt "smart", and having something develop on the males is completely possible especially if some muscle cluster or similar is in the right position. This would unburden the evolutionary pressure on the females: pick a man who has more control during bad periods and you get more children during good periods, and with that the men without control die out.
      – Demigan
      yesterday










    • I made no such assumption. Such an adaptation will arise more quickly in females than in males... Unless you are assuming that females aren't intelligent.
      – Beta
      yesterday










    • @Beta Considering that ejaculation is a more timed procedure compared to ovulation which is a long cycle of hormonal maturation, transportation and evacuation of the eggs it's far easier to stop the ejaculation through a conscious effort.
      – Demigan
      19 hours ago










    • @Demigan Your comments are unclear (or at least inconsistent with your answer). Any such periods of stillbirth or whatnot would be pressure on the females - not the males, whose contribution is done prior to conception. Females would then adapt to unpredictably changing circumstances. You would be relying upon males somehow predicting the unpredictable unhealthy periods well in advance. Psychic sperm are less likely than women not ovulating (a limited resource) or miscarrying when circumstances change to being unlikely to produce viable offspring (exactly as we see in reality).
      – pluckedkiwi
      12 hours ago


















    up vote
    3
    down vote













    We humans are capable of doing it.



    Millenia ago the people in India developed some traditiond which are called Tantra. Among such traditions, there is tantric sex. Search on Google or Amazon... There are thousands of books on it written just this century.



    Central to tantric sex for men is developing the ability to have dry orgasms without being dry. This is done through breathing and muscle control, akin to (or including, depending on the view) yoga practices. It is said to become second nature once you achieve it, and allows for a man to have multiple orgasms.






    share|improve this answer

















    • 2




      I have heard of it. But I thought it was just bullshit and a marketing tool to get people's money, such as the 1 hour extended orgasm.
      – Incognito
      yesterday










    • Even if there is no ejaculation, this is far from foolproof.
      – Sulthan
      yesterday












    • @Sulthan What dangers are there?
      – Orphevs
      yesterday






    • 1




      @Orphevs Living sperm can be present in precum, even if it's a rare case. It's why "pulling out" is not a safe method to avoid pregnancy.
      – Sulthan
      yesterday










    • @Sulthan tantric sex prevents precum as well. The risk is more in poor skill.
      – Renan
      yesterday




















    up vote
    3
    down vote













    Proceptive (?) medication - Males have to take a drug to produce sperm/gametes or one of the other necessary components of semen.



    I'm envisioning something plant- or fungus-based...



    Your early hominids live in an area where this organism is plentiful--so plentiful that they never really have to think about actively producing sperm. Some males don't like the taste, so they rarely eat it and maybe never have children or have very few. Groups that splinter off and leave the home area only reproduce if they move to an area where the same plant grows or if they take the dried fruit with them. Maybe they aren't consciously aware of it, but there's definitely a connection between the fruit and reproduction. They might even have a sex/harvest festival when the fruit ripens.



    Over time, as agriculture improves and your hominids explore their planet, their diet becomes more varied, the sperm fruit is less of a staple, and the birthrate slows down. It has become a cultural tradition for explorers to always carry a potted sperm plant with them. Sailors have been known to mutiny and force their captains to turn home whenever the potted plant dies. Horticulturalists attempt to create sperm fruit hybrids and succeed, introducing more variety into both the plant and the hominid species.



    Perhaps the sperm fruit plant is very climate-sensitive. That could be a form of natural population control. In lean times, the plant and the population don't grow as much, so there are fewer new mouths to feed. And it could lead to developing trade between groups that live in areas where the plant will grow and the areas where it won't. This sets up a few different scenarios.




    1. A global climate catastrophe wipes out 90% of the world's population. Maybe only half of that is wiped out by the actual disaster. The rest simply live their lives and die without the ability to reproduce. Only those isolated areas where the plant can grow have thriving populations. This could lead to development of cultural variations.


    2. Politics vs. Science - Your hominids have established a clear link between the sperm fruit and reproduction. Now there's a race to create a shelf-stable synthetic version so that they're no longer dependent on the fruit. The government tries to control growth and distribution of the sperm fruit, causing groups of rebels to periodically attempt to steal the plants and/or overthrow the government.


    3. Space drama - Your scientists haven't yet succeeded in developing alternatives to the sperm fruit. Or they have, but the synthetic version has a short shelf life/is costly to produce. Space colonists must take living sperm fruit plants (either in stasis or specialized terrariums) with them on their colony ships. An alien attacks! A meteor strikes the ship! All but one of the plants are destroyed, and that one is damaged! What will they do? Will the colony survive? The ships's horticulturalist was captured in the attack--will they be able to get him back? Can his daughter, who's angry at being ripped away from all her friend back home, decode his notes and heal the plant? Watch the drama unfold!!!







    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    miltonaut is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.

























      up vote
      3
      down vote













      These are humanoids so we don't have to modify human men.



      In their society males, like seahorses raise young.



      Male seahorse giving birth https://youtu.be/MsHCqrrU-Gk



      This is very energy expensive so males don't want to be having offspring all the time.



      However females will wander if they don't get regular sex. Therefore, through evolution, the males have a mechanism for ejaculating only when their previous brood is self-sufficient.






      share|improve this answer























      • +1: This is the answer I came to add. Make the young depend on the father for a long stretch of time (e.g. have the father breast feed, or have it that neither mother or father can feed the child alone). natural selection will do the rest, and build in a mechanism that ensures the parents aren't over burdened with children.
        – Binary Worrier
        11 hours ago


















      up vote
      1
      down vote













      The testes have a muscle called the cremaster, that pulls them up whenever it's too cold to maintain the right temperature for spermatogenesis (the process which sperm cell are produced), or relaxes to cool the testes whenever it's too hot. Have this process be a lot more temperature dependent, working only when the testes are around the temperature of the body.



      The cremaster muscle should not be an independent muscle, or involuntary. It should be a voluntary act to contract or relax it, depending if you want to be fertile or not. In this system, you need to pull the testes in advance, maybe some hours prior to sex, in order to have functioning sperm cells.



      Although you'll have no chance of conception, semen will be produced normally, as the majority of its components is not produced in the testes, but on different locations of male genital tract.






      share|improve this answer






























        up vote
        1
        down vote













        Look to the bladder.



        The male urethra has two purposes: the ejaculation of semen and the elimination of urine. For most men, these two functions are mutually exclusive; it is difficult to maintain an erection with an extremely full bladder, and urination becomes very difficult when a man has an erection.



        Brief anatomy lesson: the urinary and reproductive tracts meet inside the prostate gland, which surrounds the urethra and rests directly below the bladder. The vas deferens carry sperm from the testicles to the prostate, where they merge with the seminal vesicles and join with the urethra via the ejaculatory ducts.



        Downstream of the prostate lies the smaller bulbourethral gland. Human urine is acidic and poses a threat to the health of sperm. The bulbourethral gland secretes a slightly alkaline fluid, often colloquially referred to as "precum", which neutralizes the urethra prior to ejaculation. Semen itself is also slightly alkaline in order to neutralize the natural acidity of the vagina.



        I can think of two ways that we utilize the confluence of these two systems to achieve the desired effect:




        1. Males of your species are capable of urinating and ejaculating simultaneously. If the urine of your species is sufficiently acidic, it will kill the sperm before or shortly after they leave the penis.

        2. Males cannot urinate and ejaculate simultaneously, but can choose to urinate at any time and the act of urinating forcibly closes the ejaculatory ducts. In my opinion, this is the more reliable and realistic solution, since the closing of the ducts would prevent urine from entering the vas deferens where it might damage future sperm. However, the sperm would probably leak out afterwards, so caution would need to be exercised in order for this to be truly effective.






        share|improve this answer





















          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "579"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f130642%2fhow-can-i-create-a-mechanism-for-natural-reproductive-control-in-males%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          9 Answers
          9






          active

          oldest

          votes








          9 Answers
          9






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          30
          down vote













          Abstinence



          Not having sex is a "voluntary control over the discharge of semen." It is also a "natural and foolproof form of birth control and eliminate[s] the occurrence of unwanted conceptions." If you don't have sex, you won't have kids.






          share|improve this answer

















          • 10




            This answers the letter of the question, but not the spirit. It should be a comment, not an Answer.
            – Beta
            yesterday






          • 4




            @Beta, I disagree. Frame challenges are a time-honored tradition on this site, and Kingledion is a master at answering the letter of the question while challenging its spirit. I could wish that all answers were this elegant.
            – JBH
            yesterday








          • 1




            @Beta I think this answer points out that the mechanism requested by the OP is highly redundant. From a science-based basis, there is no need to develop a biologically expensive mechanism to reproduce (pun!) something that is already a feature of all creatures that reproduce sexually.
            – kingledion
            yesterday






          • 2




            Of course you can't be using humans, or even likely primates, abstinence fails horribly in humans because the human brain is built to as incompatible with abstinence as possible.
            – John
            yesterday






          • 1




            @Rekesoft The point is, the smallest baseline change is to make abstinence more effective, not to introduce some other biologically expensive mechanism. But, effective abstinence would not make much sense evolutionarily, neither would a mechanism in the testes to prevent ejaculation.
            – kingledion
            13 hours ago















          up vote
          30
          down vote













          Abstinence



          Not having sex is a "voluntary control over the discharge of semen." It is also a "natural and foolproof form of birth control and eliminate[s] the occurrence of unwanted conceptions." If you don't have sex, you won't have kids.






          share|improve this answer

















          • 10




            This answers the letter of the question, but not the spirit. It should be a comment, not an Answer.
            – Beta
            yesterday






          • 4




            @Beta, I disagree. Frame challenges are a time-honored tradition on this site, and Kingledion is a master at answering the letter of the question while challenging its spirit. I could wish that all answers were this elegant.
            – JBH
            yesterday








          • 1




            @Beta I think this answer points out that the mechanism requested by the OP is highly redundant. From a science-based basis, there is no need to develop a biologically expensive mechanism to reproduce (pun!) something that is already a feature of all creatures that reproduce sexually.
            – kingledion
            yesterday






          • 2




            Of course you can't be using humans, or even likely primates, abstinence fails horribly in humans because the human brain is built to as incompatible with abstinence as possible.
            – John
            yesterday






          • 1




            @Rekesoft The point is, the smallest baseline change is to make abstinence more effective, not to introduce some other biologically expensive mechanism. But, effective abstinence would not make much sense evolutionarily, neither would a mechanism in the testes to prevent ejaculation.
            – kingledion
            13 hours ago













          up vote
          30
          down vote










          up vote
          30
          down vote









          Abstinence



          Not having sex is a "voluntary control over the discharge of semen." It is also a "natural and foolproof form of birth control and eliminate[s] the occurrence of unwanted conceptions." If you don't have sex, you won't have kids.






          share|improve this answer












          Abstinence



          Not having sex is a "voluntary control over the discharge of semen." It is also a "natural and foolproof form of birth control and eliminate[s] the occurrence of unwanted conceptions." If you don't have sex, you won't have kids.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered yesterday









          kingledion

          70.2k24235407




          70.2k24235407








          • 10




            This answers the letter of the question, but not the spirit. It should be a comment, not an Answer.
            – Beta
            yesterday






          • 4




            @Beta, I disagree. Frame challenges are a time-honored tradition on this site, and Kingledion is a master at answering the letter of the question while challenging its spirit. I could wish that all answers were this elegant.
            – JBH
            yesterday








          • 1




            @Beta I think this answer points out that the mechanism requested by the OP is highly redundant. From a science-based basis, there is no need to develop a biologically expensive mechanism to reproduce (pun!) something that is already a feature of all creatures that reproduce sexually.
            – kingledion
            yesterday






          • 2




            Of course you can't be using humans, or even likely primates, abstinence fails horribly in humans because the human brain is built to as incompatible with abstinence as possible.
            – John
            yesterday






          • 1




            @Rekesoft The point is, the smallest baseline change is to make abstinence more effective, not to introduce some other biologically expensive mechanism. But, effective abstinence would not make much sense evolutionarily, neither would a mechanism in the testes to prevent ejaculation.
            – kingledion
            13 hours ago














          • 10




            This answers the letter of the question, but not the spirit. It should be a comment, not an Answer.
            – Beta
            yesterday






          • 4




            @Beta, I disagree. Frame challenges are a time-honored tradition on this site, and Kingledion is a master at answering the letter of the question while challenging its spirit. I could wish that all answers were this elegant.
            – JBH
            yesterday








          • 1




            @Beta I think this answer points out that the mechanism requested by the OP is highly redundant. From a science-based basis, there is no need to develop a biologically expensive mechanism to reproduce (pun!) something that is already a feature of all creatures that reproduce sexually.
            – kingledion
            yesterday






          • 2




            Of course you can't be using humans, or even likely primates, abstinence fails horribly in humans because the human brain is built to as incompatible with abstinence as possible.
            – John
            yesterday






          • 1




            @Rekesoft The point is, the smallest baseline change is to make abstinence more effective, not to introduce some other biologically expensive mechanism. But, effective abstinence would not make much sense evolutionarily, neither would a mechanism in the testes to prevent ejaculation.
            – kingledion
            13 hours ago








          10




          10




          This answers the letter of the question, but not the spirit. It should be a comment, not an Answer.
          – Beta
          yesterday




          This answers the letter of the question, but not the spirit. It should be a comment, not an Answer.
          – Beta
          yesterday




          4




          4




          @Beta, I disagree. Frame challenges are a time-honored tradition on this site, and Kingledion is a master at answering the letter of the question while challenging its spirit. I could wish that all answers were this elegant.
          – JBH
          yesterday






          @Beta, I disagree. Frame challenges are a time-honored tradition on this site, and Kingledion is a master at answering the letter of the question while challenging its spirit. I could wish that all answers were this elegant.
          – JBH
          yesterday






          1




          1




          @Beta I think this answer points out that the mechanism requested by the OP is highly redundant. From a science-based basis, there is no need to develop a biologically expensive mechanism to reproduce (pun!) something that is already a feature of all creatures that reproduce sexually.
          – kingledion
          yesterday




          @Beta I think this answer points out that the mechanism requested by the OP is highly redundant. From a science-based basis, there is no need to develop a biologically expensive mechanism to reproduce (pun!) something that is already a feature of all creatures that reproduce sexually.
          – kingledion
          yesterday




          2




          2




          Of course you can't be using humans, or even likely primates, abstinence fails horribly in humans because the human brain is built to as incompatible with abstinence as possible.
          – John
          yesterday




          Of course you can't be using humans, or even likely primates, abstinence fails horribly in humans because the human brain is built to as incompatible with abstinence as possible.
          – John
          yesterday




          1




          1




          @Rekesoft The point is, the smallest baseline change is to make abstinence more effective, not to introduce some other biologically expensive mechanism. But, effective abstinence would not make much sense evolutionarily, neither would a mechanism in the testes to prevent ejaculation.
          – kingledion
          13 hours ago




          @Rekesoft The point is, the smallest baseline change is to make abstinence more effective, not to introduce some other biologically expensive mechanism. But, effective abstinence would not make much sense evolutionarily, neither would a mechanism in the testes to prevent ejaculation.
          – kingledion
          13 hours ago










          up vote
          13
          down vote













          You can you go two ways, I think.



          Way 1:



          Sperm production follow a periodic cycle, roughly like egg production in the female does. This means that only intercourse during the right moment will be fertile, any other time will be non fertile. To prevent extinction of course you need a synchronization of female and male periods.



          Way 2:



          The male has to consciously decide for emitting semen, something along the line of the western interpretation of tantric sex. A muscular contraction at the right moment can simply stop the seminal emission.






          share|improve this answer

























            up vote
            13
            down vote













            You can you go two ways, I think.



            Way 1:



            Sperm production follow a periodic cycle, roughly like egg production in the female does. This means that only intercourse during the right moment will be fertile, any other time will be non fertile. To prevent extinction of course you need a synchronization of female and male periods.



            Way 2:



            The male has to consciously decide for emitting semen, something along the line of the western interpretation of tantric sex. A muscular contraction at the right moment can simply stop the seminal emission.






            share|improve this answer























              up vote
              13
              down vote










              up vote
              13
              down vote









              You can you go two ways, I think.



              Way 1:



              Sperm production follow a periodic cycle, roughly like egg production in the female does. This means that only intercourse during the right moment will be fertile, any other time will be non fertile. To prevent extinction of course you need a synchronization of female and male periods.



              Way 2:



              The male has to consciously decide for emitting semen, something along the line of the western interpretation of tantric sex. A muscular contraction at the right moment can simply stop the seminal emission.






              share|improve this answer












              You can you go two ways, I think.



              Way 1:



              Sperm production follow a periodic cycle, roughly like egg production in the female does. This means that only intercourse during the right moment will be fertile, any other time will be non fertile. To prevent extinction of course you need a synchronization of female and male periods.



              Way 2:



              The male has to consciously decide for emitting semen, something along the line of the western interpretation of tantric sex. A muscular contraction at the right moment can simply stop the seminal emission.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered yesterday









              L.Dutch

              69.5k22164335




              69.5k22164335






















                  up vote
                  9
                  down vote













                  Retrograde ejaculation




                  Retrograde ejaculation occurs when semen which would, in most cases,
                  be ejaculated via the urethra is redirected to the urinary bladder.
                  Normally, the sphincter of the bladder contracts before ejaculation
                  forcing the semen to exit via the urethra, the path of least
                  resistance. When the bladder sphincter does not function properly,
                  retrograde ejaculation may occur. It can also be induced deliberately
                  by a male as a primitive form of male birth control (known as coitus
                  saxonicus) or as part of certain alternative medicine practices.




                  You want some deal where the men can fulfill their culturo-evolutionary imperative to have lots of sex, but shortcircuit the fitness benefit that it historically provided. That will work until mutant men who can't do the short-circuit overwhelm the population with their progeny.



                  But in the short term, your men can be yogi masters (if that was not already the case) with conscious control over the bladder sphincter. Sex occurs normally, with the ejaculate captured in the bladder to be voided against a tree at some later time. Out of distaste for banality, I hope you make these men and their partners be capable of all sorts of other yoga sex tricks too.






                  share|improve this answer





















                  • Exactly how was this consciously achieved
                    – anon
                    9 hours ago















                  up vote
                  9
                  down vote













                  Retrograde ejaculation




                  Retrograde ejaculation occurs when semen which would, in most cases,
                  be ejaculated via the urethra is redirected to the urinary bladder.
                  Normally, the sphincter of the bladder contracts before ejaculation
                  forcing the semen to exit via the urethra, the path of least
                  resistance. When the bladder sphincter does not function properly,
                  retrograde ejaculation may occur. It can also be induced deliberately
                  by a male as a primitive form of male birth control (known as coitus
                  saxonicus) or as part of certain alternative medicine practices.




                  You want some deal where the men can fulfill their culturo-evolutionary imperative to have lots of sex, but shortcircuit the fitness benefit that it historically provided. That will work until mutant men who can't do the short-circuit overwhelm the population with their progeny.



                  But in the short term, your men can be yogi masters (if that was not already the case) with conscious control over the bladder sphincter. Sex occurs normally, with the ejaculate captured in the bladder to be voided against a tree at some later time. Out of distaste for banality, I hope you make these men and their partners be capable of all sorts of other yoga sex tricks too.






                  share|improve this answer





















                  • Exactly how was this consciously achieved
                    – anon
                    9 hours ago













                  up vote
                  9
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  9
                  down vote









                  Retrograde ejaculation




                  Retrograde ejaculation occurs when semen which would, in most cases,
                  be ejaculated via the urethra is redirected to the urinary bladder.
                  Normally, the sphincter of the bladder contracts before ejaculation
                  forcing the semen to exit via the urethra, the path of least
                  resistance. When the bladder sphincter does not function properly,
                  retrograde ejaculation may occur. It can also be induced deliberately
                  by a male as a primitive form of male birth control (known as coitus
                  saxonicus) or as part of certain alternative medicine practices.




                  You want some deal where the men can fulfill their culturo-evolutionary imperative to have lots of sex, but shortcircuit the fitness benefit that it historically provided. That will work until mutant men who can't do the short-circuit overwhelm the population with their progeny.



                  But in the short term, your men can be yogi masters (if that was not already the case) with conscious control over the bladder sphincter. Sex occurs normally, with the ejaculate captured in the bladder to be voided against a tree at some later time. Out of distaste for banality, I hope you make these men and their partners be capable of all sorts of other yoga sex tricks too.






                  share|improve this answer












                  Retrograde ejaculation




                  Retrograde ejaculation occurs when semen which would, in most cases,
                  be ejaculated via the urethra is redirected to the urinary bladder.
                  Normally, the sphincter of the bladder contracts before ejaculation
                  forcing the semen to exit via the urethra, the path of least
                  resistance. When the bladder sphincter does not function properly,
                  retrograde ejaculation may occur. It can also be induced deliberately
                  by a male as a primitive form of male birth control (known as coitus
                  saxonicus) or as part of certain alternative medicine practices.




                  You want some deal where the men can fulfill their culturo-evolutionary imperative to have lots of sex, but shortcircuit the fitness benefit that it historically provided. That will work until mutant men who can't do the short-circuit overwhelm the population with their progeny.



                  But in the short term, your men can be yogi masters (if that was not already the case) with conscious control over the bladder sphincter. Sex occurs normally, with the ejaculate captured in the bladder to be voided against a tree at some later time. Out of distaste for banality, I hope you make these men and their partners be capable of all sorts of other yoga sex tricks too.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered yesterday









                  Willk

                  97.1k25188409




                  97.1k25188409












                  • Exactly how was this consciously achieved
                    – anon
                    9 hours ago


















                  • Exactly how was this consciously achieved
                    – anon
                    9 hours ago
















                  Exactly how was this consciously achieved
                  – anon
                  9 hours ago




                  Exactly how was this consciously achieved
                  – anon
                  9 hours ago










                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote













                  Intelligence has allowed mankind to thrive, and your humanoids might have evolved it out of a necessity.



                  First option: disease. We already have a common disease that has a ludicrous chance to kill an unborn child. Biology found a solution: kissing. By kissing you exchange saliva and if the man has the disease he'll infect the woman. By the time the disease becomes dangerous to the baby the woman has created an immune response and the baby is safe. Now imagine a disease that primarily lives in the reproductive organs and the man will have an idea when he's infected during sex. The disease works like the flu and changes each year, so you dont stay immune. If the disease survives long enough to have a high chance of killing the child the man can choose not to ejaculate but continue sex normally to both increase the chance of infecting the woman and give her time to become immune and for the social benefits of sex.



                  The second and more elaborate option: Imagine a world where there are large stretches of time where unborn children and babies have almost 100% chance of dying. Its a waste of time, energy and potential children as you need to recover after a failed attempt. If these stretches of time are happening at predictable intervals biology would simply adapt the cycles to those intervals. If they arent predictable only two solutions remain: Make sure your biology can create children at a rapid pace or become intelligent enough to learn all the signs when children wont be viable. For potenial comments like "biology would learn the signs of the event and not need intelligence" there would need to be several events that seperately may not cause death in the babies but combined would cause that death.



                  Sex would still be used as a social interaction between the man and woman in those times children shouldnt be born, but to ensure no babies are born the man would prevent ejaculation.






                  share|improve this answer





















                  • In the second scenario, there would be more selection pressure on females than males. So the females would adapt to be infertile during the dangerous seasons (with or without conscious volition), and the selection pressure on the males would vanish.
                    – Beta
                    yesterday










                  • @Beta that would be assuming that these are actual seasons rather than events of different time length and unpredictable starting periods. Otherwise you would be absolutely right. Even so evolution isnt "smart", and having something develop on the males is completely possible especially if some muscle cluster or similar is in the right position. This would unburden the evolutionary pressure on the females: pick a man who has more control during bad periods and you get more children during good periods, and with that the men without control die out.
                    – Demigan
                    yesterday










                  • I made no such assumption. Such an adaptation will arise more quickly in females than in males... Unless you are assuming that females aren't intelligent.
                    – Beta
                    yesterday










                  • @Beta Considering that ejaculation is a more timed procedure compared to ovulation which is a long cycle of hormonal maturation, transportation and evacuation of the eggs it's far easier to stop the ejaculation through a conscious effort.
                    – Demigan
                    19 hours ago










                  • @Demigan Your comments are unclear (or at least inconsistent with your answer). Any such periods of stillbirth or whatnot would be pressure on the females - not the males, whose contribution is done prior to conception. Females would then adapt to unpredictably changing circumstances. You would be relying upon males somehow predicting the unpredictable unhealthy periods well in advance. Psychic sperm are less likely than women not ovulating (a limited resource) or miscarrying when circumstances change to being unlikely to produce viable offspring (exactly as we see in reality).
                    – pluckedkiwi
                    12 hours ago















                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote













                  Intelligence has allowed mankind to thrive, and your humanoids might have evolved it out of a necessity.



                  First option: disease. We already have a common disease that has a ludicrous chance to kill an unborn child. Biology found a solution: kissing. By kissing you exchange saliva and if the man has the disease he'll infect the woman. By the time the disease becomes dangerous to the baby the woman has created an immune response and the baby is safe. Now imagine a disease that primarily lives in the reproductive organs and the man will have an idea when he's infected during sex. The disease works like the flu and changes each year, so you dont stay immune. If the disease survives long enough to have a high chance of killing the child the man can choose not to ejaculate but continue sex normally to both increase the chance of infecting the woman and give her time to become immune and for the social benefits of sex.



                  The second and more elaborate option: Imagine a world where there are large stretches of time where unborn children and babies have almost 100% chance of dying. Its a waste of time, energy and potential children as you need to recover after a failed attempt. If these stretches of time are happening at predictable intervals biology would simply adapt the cycles to those intervals. If they arent predictable only two solutions remain: Make sure your biology can create children at a rapid pace or become intelligent enough to learn all the signs when children wont be viable. For potenial comments like "biology would learn the signs of the event and not need intelligence" there would need to be several events that seperately may not cause death in the babies but combined would cause that death.



                  Sex would still be used as a social interaction between the man and woman in those times children shouldnt be born, but to ensure no babies are born the man would prevent ejaculation.






                  share|improve this answer





















                  • In the second scenario, there would be more selection pressure on females than males. So the females would adapt to be infertile during the dangerous seasons (with or without conscious volition), and the selection pressure on the males would vanish.
                    – Beta
                    yesterday










                  • @Beta that would be assuming that these are actual seasons rather than events of different time length and unpredictable starting periods. Otherwise you would be absolutely right. Even so evolution isnt "smart", and having something develop on the males is completely possible especially if some muscle cluster or similar is in the right position. This would unburden the evolutionary pressure on the females: pick a man who has more control during bad periods and you get more children during good periods, and with that the men without control die out.
                    – Demigan
                    yesterday










                  • I made no such assumption. Such an adaptation will arise more quickly in females than in males... Unless you are assuming that females aren't intelligent.
                    – Beta
                    yesterday










                  • @Beta Considering that ejaculation is a more timed procedure compared to ovulation which is a long cycle of hormonal maturation, transportation and evacuation of the eggs it's far easier to stop the ejaculation through a conscious effort.
                    – Demigan
                    19 hours ago










                  • @Demigan Your comments are unclear (or at least inconsistent with your answer). Any such periods of stillbirth or whatnot would be pressure on the females - not the males, whose contribution is done prior to conception. Females would then adapt to unpredictably changing circumstances. You would be relying upon males somehow predicting the unpredictable unhealthy periods well in advance. Psychic sperm are less likely than women not ovulating (a limited resource) or miscarrying when circumstances change to being unlikely to produce viable offspring (exactly as we see in reality).
                    – pluckedkiwi
                    12 hours ago













                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote









                  Intelligence has allowed mankind to thrive, and your humanoids might have evolved it out of a necessity.



                  First option: disease. We already have a common disease that has a ludicrous chance to kill an unborn child. Biology found a solution: kissing. By kissing you exchange saliva and if the man has the disease he'll infect the woman. By the time the disease becomes dangerous to the baby the woman has created an immune response and the baby is safe. Now imagine a disease that primarily lives in the reproductive organs and the man will have an idea when he's infected during sex. The disease works like the flu and changes each year, so you dont stay immune. If the disease survives long enough to have a high chance of killing the child the man can choose not to ejaculate but continue sex normally to both increase the chance of infecting the woman and give her time to become immune and for the social benefits of sex.



                  The second and more elaborate option: Imagine a world where there are large stretches of time where unborn children and babies have almost 100% chance of dying. Its a waste of time, energy and potential children as you need to recover after a failed attempt. If these stretches of time are happening at predictable intervals biology would simply adapt the cycles to those intervals. If they arent predictable only two solutions remain: Make sure your biology can create children at a rapid pace or become intelligent enough to learn all the signs when children wont be viable. For potenial comments like "biology would learn the signs of the event and not need intelligence" there would need to be several events that seperately may not cause death in the babies but combined would cause that death.



                  Sex would still be used as a social interaction between the man and woman in those times children shouldnt be born, but to ensure no babies are born the man would prevent ejaculation.






                  share|improve this answer












                  Intelligence has allowed mankind to thrive, and your humanoids might have evolved it out of a necessity.



                  First option: disease. We already have a common disease that has a ludicrous chance to kill an unborn child. Biology found a solution: kissing. By kissing you exchange saliva and if the man has the disease he'll infect the woman. By the time the disease becomes dangerous to the baby the woman has created an immune response and the baby is safe. Now imagine a disease that primarily lives in the reproductive organs and the man will have an idea when he's infected during sex. The disease works like the flu and changes each year, so you dont stay immune. If the disease survives long enough to have a high chance of killing the child the man can choose not to ejaculate but continue sex normally to both increase the chance of infecting the woman and give her time to become immune and for the social benefits of sex.



                  The second and more elaborate option: Imagine a world where there are large stretches of time where unborn children and babies have almost 100% chance of dying. Its a waste of time, energy and potential children as you need to recover after a failed attempt. If these stretches of time are happening at predictable intervals biology would simply adapt the cycles to those intervals. If they arent predictable only two solutions remain: Make sure your biology can create children at a rapid pace or become intelligent enough to learn all the signs when children wont be viable. For potenial comments like "biology would learn the signs of the event and not need intelligence" there would need to be several events that seperately may not cause death in the babies but combined would cause that death.



                  Sex would still be used as a social interaction between the man and woman in those times children shouldnt be born, but to ensure no babies are born the man would prevent ejaculation.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered yesterday









                  Demigan

                  6,2241433




                  6,2241433












                  • In the second scenario, there would be more selection pressure on females than males. So the females would adapt to be infertile during the dangerous seasons (with or without conscious volition), and the selection pressure on the males would vanish.
                    – Beta
                    yesterday










                  • @Beta that would be assuming that these are actual seasons rather than events of different time length and unpredictable starting periods. Otherwise you would be absolutely right. Even so evolution isnt "smart", and having something develop on the males is completely possible especially if some muscle cluster or similar is in the right position. This would unburden the evolutionary pressure on the females: pick a man who has more control during bad periods and you get more children during good periods, and with that the men without control die out.
                    – Demigan
                    yesterday










                  • I made no such assumption. Such an adaptation will arise more quickly in females than in males... Unless you are assuming that females aren't intelligent.
                    – Beta
                    yesterday










                  • @Beta Considering that ejaculation is a more timed procedure compared to ovulation which is a long cycle of hormonal maturation, transportation and evacuation of the eggs it's far easier to stop the ejaculation through a conscious effort.
                    – Demigan
                    19 hours ago










                  • @Demigan Your comments are unclear (or at least inconsistent with your answer). Any such periods of stillbirth or whatnot would be pressure on the females - not the males, whose contribution is done prior to conception. Females would then adapt to unpredictably changing circumstances. You would be relying upon males somehow predicting the unpredictable unhealthy periods well in advance. Psychic sperm are less likely than women not ovulating (a limited resource) or miscarrying when circumstances change to being unlikely to produce viable offspring (exactly as we see in reality).
                    – pluckedkiwi
                    12 hours ago


















                  • In the second scenario, there would be more selection pressure on females than males. So the females would adapt to be infertile during the dangerous seasons (with or without conscious volition), and the selection pressure on the males would vanish.
                    – Beta
                    yesterday










                  • @Beta that would be assuming that these are actual seasons rather than events of different time length and unpredictable starting periods. Otherwise you would be absolutely right. Even so evolution isnt "smart", and having something develop on the males is completely possible especially if some muscle cluster or similar is in the right position. This would unburden the evolutionary pressure on the females: pick a man who has more control during bad periods and you get more children during good periods, and with that the men without control die out.
                    – Demigan
                    yesterday










                  • I made no such assumption. Such an adaptation will arise more quickly in females than in males... Unless you are assuming that females aren't intelligent.
                    – Beta
                    yesterday










                  • @Beta Considering that ejaculation is a more timed procedure compared to ovulation which is a long cycle of hormonal maturation, transportation and evacuation of the eggs it's far easier to stop the ejaculation through a conscious effort.
                    – Demigan
                    19 hours ago










                  • @Demigan Your comments are unclear (or at least inconsistent with your answer). Any such periods of stillbirth or whatnot would be pressure on the females - not the males, whose contribution is done prior to conception. Females would then adapt to unpredictably changing circumstances. You would be relying upon males somehow predicting the unpredictable unhealthy periods well in advance. Psychic sperm are less likely than women not ovulating (a limited resource) or miscarrying when circumstances change to being unlikely to produce viable offspring (exactly as we see in reality).
                    – pluckedkiwi
                    12 hours ago
















                  In the second scenario, there would be more selection pressure on females than males. So the females would adapt to be infertile during the dangerous seasons (with or without conscious volition), and the selection pressure on the males would vanish.
                  – Beta
                  yesterday




                  In the second scenario, there would be more selection pressure on females than males. So the females would adapt to be infertile during the dangerous seasons (with or without conscious volition), and the selection pressure on the males would vanish.
                  – Beta
                  yesterday












                  @Beta that would be assuming that these are actual seasons rather than events of different time length and unpredictable starting periods. Otherwise you would be absolutely right. Even so evolution isnt "smart", and having something develop on the males is completely possible especially if some muscle cluster or similar is in the right position. This would unburden the evolutionary pressure on the females: pick a man who has more control during bad periods and you get more children during good periods, and with that the men without control die out.
                  – Demigan
                  yesterday




                  @Beta that would be assuming that these are actual seasons rather than events of different time length and unpredictable starting periods. Otherwise you would be absolutely right. Even so evolution isnt "smart", and having something develop on the males is completely possible especially if some muscle cluster or similar is in the right position. This would unburden the evolutionary pressure on the females: pick a man who has more control during bad periods and you get more children during good periods, and with that the men without control die out.
                  – Demigan
                  yesterday












                  I made no such assumption. Such an adaptation will arise more quickly in females than in males... Unless you are assuming that females aren't intelligent.
                  – Beta
                  yesterday




                  I made no such assumption. Such an adaptation will arise more quickly in females than in males... Unless you are assuming that females aren't intelligent.
                  – Beta
                  yesterday












                  @Beta Considering that ejaculation is a more timed procedure compared to ovulation which is a long cycle of hormonal maturation, transportation and evacuation of the eggs it's far easier to stop the ejaculation through a conscious effort.
                  – Demigan
                  19 hours ago




                  @Beta Considering that ejaculation is a more timed procedure compared to ovulation which is a long cycle of hormonal maturation, transportation and evacuation of the eggs it's far easier to stop the ejaculation through a conscious effort.
                  – Demigan
                  19 hours ago












                  @Demigan Your comments are unclear (or at least inconsistent with your answer). Any such periods of stillbirth or whatnot would be pressure on the females - not the males, whose contribution is done prior to conception. Females would then adapt to unpredictably changing circumstances. You would be relying upon males somehow predicting the unpredictable unhealthy periods well in advance. Psychic sperm are less likely than women not ovulating (a limited resource) or miscarrying when circumstances change to being unlikely to produce viable offspring (exactly as we see in reality).
                  – pluckedkiwi
                  12 hours ago




                  @Demigan Your comments are unclear (or at least inconsistent with your answer). Any such periods of stillbirth or whatnot would be pressure on the females - not the males, whose contribution is done prior to conception. Females would then adapt to unpredictably changing circumstances. You would be relying upon males somehow predicting the unpredictable unhealthy periods well in advance. Psychic sperm are less likely than women not ovulating (a limited resource) or miscarrying when circumstances change to being unlikely to produce viable offspring (exactly as we see in reality).
                  – pluckedkiwi
                  12 hours ago










                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote













                  We humans are capable of doing it.



                  Millenia ago the people in India developed some traditiond which are called Tantra. Among such traditions, there is tantric sex. Search on Google or Amazon... There are thousands of books on it written just this century.



                  Central to tantric sex for men is developing the ability to have dry orgasms without being dry. This is done through breathing and muscle control, akin to (or including, depending on the view) yoga practices. It is said to become second nature once you achieve it, and allows for a man to have multiple orgasms.






                  share|improve this answer

















                  • 2




                    I have heard of it. But I thought it was just bullshit and a marketing tool to get people's money, such as the 1 hour extended orgasm.
                    – Incognito
                    yesterday










                  • Even if there is no ejaculation, this is far from foolproof.
                    – Sulthan
                    yesterday












                  • @Sulthan What dangers are there?
                    – Orphevs
                    yesterday






                  • 1




                    @Orphevs Living sperm can be present in precum, even if it's a rare case. It's why "pulling out" is not a safe method to avoid pregnancy.
                    – Sulthan
                    yesterday










                  • @Sulthan tantric sex prevents precum as well. The risk is more in poor skill.
                    – Renan
                    yesterday

















                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote













                  We humans are capable of doing it.



                  Millenia ago the people in India developed some traditiond which are called Tantra. Among such traditions, there is tantric sex. Search on Google or Amazon... There are thousands of books on it written just this century.



                  Central to tantric sex for men is developing the ability to have dry orgasms without being dry. This is done through breathing and muscle control, akin to (or including, depending on the view) yoga practices. It is said to become second nature once you achieve it, and allows for a man to have multiple orgasms.






                  share|improve this answer

















                  • 2




                    I have heard of it. But I thought it was just bullshit and a marketing tool to get people's money, such as the 1 hour extended orgasm.
                    – Incognito
                    yesterday










                  • Even if there is no ejaculation, this is far from foolproof.
                    – Sulthan
                    yesterday












                  • @Sulthan What dangers are there?
                    – Orphevs
                    yesterday






                  • 1




                    @Orphevs Living sperm can be present in precum, even if it's a rare case. It's why "pulling out" is not a safe method to avoid pregnancy.
                    – Sulthan
                    yesterday










                  • @Sulthan tantric sex prevents precum as well. The risk is more in poor skill.
                    – Renan
                    yesterday















                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote









                  We humans are capable of doing it.



                  Millenia ago the people in India developed some traditiond which are called Tantra. Among such traditions, there is tantric sex. Search on Google or Amazon... There are thousands of books on it written just this century.



                  Central to tantric sex for men is developing the ability to have dry orgasms without being dry. This is done through breathing and muscle control, akin to (or including, depending on the view) yoga practices. It is said to become second nature once you achieve it, and allows for a man to have multiple orgasms.






                  share|improve this answer












                  We humans are capable of doing it.



                  Millenia ago the people in India developed some traditiond which are called Tantra. Among such traditions, there is tantric sex. Search on Google or Amazon... There are thousands of books on it written just this century.



                  Central to tantric sex for men is developing the ability to have dry orgasms without being dry. This is done through breathing and muscle control, akin to (or including, depending on the view) yoga practices. It is said to become second nature once you achieve it, and allows for a man to have multiple orgasms.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered yesterday









                  Renan

                  39.1k1189198




                  39.1k1189198








                  • 2




                    I have heard of it. But I thought it was just bullshit and a marketing tool to get people's money, such as the 1 hour extended orgasm.
                    – Incognito
                    yesterday










                  • Even if there is no ejaculation, this is far from foolproof.
                    – Sulthan
                    yesterday












                  • @Sulthan What dangers are there?
                    – Orphevs
                    yesterday






                  • 1




                    @Orphevs Living sperm can be present in precum, even if it's a rare case. It's why "pulling out" is not a safe method to avoid pregnancy.
                    – Sulthan
                    yesterday










                  • @Sulthan tantric sex prevents precum as well. The risk is more in poor skill.
                    – Renan
                    yesterday
















                  • 2




                    I have heard of it. But I thought it was just bullshit and a marketing tool to get people's money, such as the 1 hour extended orgasm.
                    – Incognito
                    yesterday










                  • Even if there is no ejaculation, this is far from foolproof.
                    – Sulthan
                    yesterday












                  • @Sulthan What dangers are there?
                    – Orphevs
                    yesterday






                  • 1




                    @Orphevs Living sperm can be present in precum, even if it's a rare case. It's why "pulling out" is not a safe method to avoid pregnancy.
                    – Sulthan
                    yesterday










                  • @Sulthan tantric sex prevents precum as well. The risk is more in poor skill.
                    – Renan
                    yesterday










                  2




                  2




                  I have heard of it. But I thought it was just bullshit and a marketing tool to get people's money, such as the 1 hour extended orgasm.
                  – Incognito
                  yesterday




                  I have heard of it. But I thought it was just bullshit and a marketing tool to get people's money, such as the 1 hour extended orgasm.
                  – Incognito
                  yesterday












                  Even if there is no ejaculation, this is far from foolproof.
                  – Sulthan
                  yesterday






                  Even if there is no ejaculation, this is far from foolproof.
                  – Sulthan
                  yesterday














                  @Sulthan What dangers are there?
                  – Orphevs
                  yesterday




                  @Sulthan What dangers are there?
                  – Orphevs
                  yesterday




                  1




                  1




                  @Orphevs Living sperm can be present in precum, even if it's a rare case. It's why "pulling out" is not a safe method to avoid pregnancy.
                  – Sulthan
                  yesterday




                  @Orphevs Living sperm can be present in precum, even if it's a rare case. It's why "pulling out" is not a safe method to avoid pregnancy.
                  – Sulthan
                  yesterday












                  @Sulthan tantric sex prevents precum as well. The risk is more in poor skill.
                  – Renan
                  yesterday






                  @Sulthan tantric sex prevents precum as well. The risk is more in poor skill.
                  – Renan
                  yesterday












                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote













                  Proceptive (?) medication - Males have to take a drug to produce sperm/gametes or one of the other necessary components of semen.



                  I'm envisioning something plant- or fungus-based...



                  Your early hominids live in an area where this organism is plentiful--so plentiful that they never really have to think about actively producing sperm. Some males don't like the taste, so they rarely eat it and maybe never have children or have very few. Groups that splinter off and leave the home area only reproduce if they move to an area where the same plant grows or if they take the dried fruit with them. Maybe they aren't consciously aware of it, but there's definitely a connection between the fruit and reproduction. They might even have a sex/harvest festival when the fruit ripens.



                  Over time, as agriculture improves and your hominids explore their planet, their diet becomes more varied, the sperm fruit is less of a staple, and the birthrate slows down. It has become a cultural tradition for explorers to always carry a potted sperm plant with them. Sailors have been known to mutiny and force their captains to turn home whenever the potted plant dies. Horticulturalists attempt to create sperm fruit hybrids and succeed, introducing more variety into both the plant and the hominid species.



                  Perhaps the sperm fruit plant is very climate-sensitive. That could be a form of natural population control. In lean times, the plant and the population don't grow as much, so there are fewer new mouths to feed. And it could lead to developing trade between groups that live in areas where the plant will grow and the areas where it won't. This sets up a few different scenarios.




                  1. A global climate catastrophe wipes out 90% of the world's population. Maybe only half of that is wiped out by the actual disaster. The rest simply live their lives and die without the ability to reproduce. Only those isolated areas where the plant can grow have thriving populations. This could lead to development of cultural variations.


                  2. Politics vs. Science - Your hominids have established a clear link between the sperm fruit and reproduction. Now there's a race to create a shelf-stable synthetic version so that they're no longer dependent on the fruit. The government tries to control growth and distribution of the sperm fruit, causing groups of rebels to periodically attempt to steal the plants and/or overthrow the government.


                  3. Space drama - Your scientists haven't yet succeeded in developing alternatives to the sperm fruit. Or they have, but the synthetic version has a short shelf life/is costly to produce. Space colonists must take living sperm fruit plants (either in stasis or specialized terrariums) with them on their colony ships. An alien attacks! A meteor strikes the ship! All but one of the plants are destroyed, and that one is damaged! What will they do? Will the colony survive? The ships's horticulturalist was captured in the attack--will they be able to get him back? Can his daughter, who's angry at being ripped away from all her friend back home, decode his notes and heal the plant? Watch the drama unfold!!!







                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  miltonaut is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                    up vote
                    3
                    down vote













                    Proceptive (?) medication - Males have to take a drug to produce sperm/gametes or one of the other necessary components of semen.



                    I'm envisioning something plant- or fungus-based...



                    Your early hominids live in an area where this organism is plentiful--so plentiful that they never really have to think about actively producing sperm. Some males don't like the taste, so they rarely eat it and maybe never have children or have very few. Groups that splinter off and leave the home area only reproduce if they move to an area where the same plant grows or if they take the dried fruit with them. Maybe they aren't consciously aware of it, but there's definitely a connection between the fruit and reproduction. They might even have a sex/harvest festival when the fruit ripens.



                    Over time, as agriculture improves and your hominids explore their planet, their diet becomes more varied, the sperm fruit is less of a staple, and the birthrate slows down. It has become a cultural tradition for explorers to always carry a potted sperm plant with them. Sailors have been known to mutiny and force their captains to turn home whenever the potted plant dies. Horticulturalists attempt to create sperm fruit hybrids and succeed, introducing more variety into both the plant and the hominid species.



                    Perhaps the sperm fruit plant is very climate-sensitive. That could be a form of natural population control. In lean times, the plant and the population don't grow as much, so there are fewer new mouths to feed. And it could lead to developing trade between groups that live in areas where the plant will grow and the areas where it won't. This sets up a few different scenarios.




                    1. A global climate catastrophe wipes out 90% of the world's population. Maybe only half of that is wiped out by the actual disaster. The rest simply live their lives and die without the ability to reproduce. Only those isolated areas where the plant can grow have thriving populations. This could lead to development of cultural variations.


                    2. Politics vs. Science - Your hominids have established a clear link between the sperm fruit and reproduction. Now there's a race to create a shelf-stable synthetic version so that they're no longer dependent on the fruit. The government tries to control growth and distribution of the sperm fruit, causing groups of rebels to periodically attempt to steal the plants and/or overthrow the government.


                    3. Space drama - Your scientists haven't yet succeeded in developing alternatives to the sperm fruit. Or they have, but the synthetic version has a short shelf life/is costly to produce. Space colonists must take living sperm fruit plants (either in stasis or specialized terrariums) with them on their colony ships. An alien attacks! A meteor strikes the ship! All but one of the plants are destroyed, and that one is damaged! What will they do? Will the colony survive? The ships's horticulturalist was captured in the attack--will they be able to get him back? Can his daughter, who's angry at being ripped away from all her friend back home, decode his notes and heal the plant? Watch the drama unfold!!!







                    share|improve this answer








                    New contributor




                    miltonaut is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.




















                      up vote
                      3
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      3
                      down vote









                      Proceptive (?) medication - Males have to take a drug to produce sperm/gametes or one of the other necessary components of semen.



                      I'm envisioning something plant- or fungus-based...



                      Your early hominids live in an area where this organism is plentiful--so plentiful that they never really have to think about actively producing sperm. Some males don't like the taste, so they rarely eat it and maybe never have children or have very few. Groups that splinter off and leave the home area only reproduce if they move to an area where the same plant grows or if they take the dried fruit with them. Maybe they aren't consciously aware of it, but there's definitely a connection between the fruit and reproduction. They might even have a sex/harvest festival when the fruit ripens.



                      Over time, as agriculture improves and your hominids explore their planet, their diet becomes more varied, the sperm fruit is less of a staple, and the birthrate slows down. It has become a cultural tradition for explorers to always carry a potted sperm plant with them. Sailors have been known to mutiny and force their captains to turn home whenever the potted plant dies. Horticulturalists attempt to create sperm fruit hybrids and succeed, introducing more variety into both the plant and the hominid species.



                      Perhaps the sperm fruit plant is very climate-sensitive. That could be a form of natural population control. In lean times, the plant and the population don't grow as much, so there are fewer new mouths to feed. And it could lead to developing trade between groups that live in areas where the plant will grow and the areas where it won't. This sets up a few different scenarios.




                      1. A global climate catastrophe wipes out 90% of the world's population. Maybe only half of that is wiped out by the actual disaster. The rest simply live their lives and die without the ability to reproduce. Only those isolated areas where the plant can grow have thriving populations. This could lead to development of cultural variations.


                      2. Politics vs. Science - Your hominids have established a clear link between the sperm fruit and reproduction. Now there's a race to create a shelf-stable synthetic version so that they're no longer dependent on the fruit. The government tries to control growth and distribution of the sperm fruit, causing groups of rebels to periodically attempt to steal the plants and/or overthrow the government.


                      3. Space drama - Your scientists haven't yet succeeded in developing alternatives to the sperm fruit. Or they have, but the synthetic version has a short shelf life/is costly to produce. Space colonists must take living sperm fruit plants (either in stasis or specialized terrariums) with them on their colony ships. An alien attacks! A meteor strikes the ship! All but one of the plants are destroyed, and that one is damaged! What will they do? Will the colony survive? The ships's horticulturalist was captured in the attack--will they be able to get him back? Can his daughter, who's angry at being ripped away from all her friend back home, decode his notes and heal the plant? Watch the drama unfold!!!







                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      miltonaut is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                      Proceptive (?) medication - Males have to take a drug to produce sperm/gametes or one of the other necessary components of semen.



                      I'm envisioning something plant- or fungus-based...



                      Your early hominids live in an area where this organism is plentiful--so plentiful that they never really have to think about actively producing sperm. Some males don't like the taste, so they rarely eat it and maybe never have children or have very few. Groups that splinter off and leave the home area only reproduce if they move to an area where the same plant grows or if they take the dried fruit with them. Maybe they aren't consciously aware of it, but there's definitely a connection between the fruit and reproduction. They might even have a sex/harvest festival when the fruit ripens.



                      Over time, as agriculture improves and your hominids explore their planet, their diet becomes more varied, the sperm fruit is less of a staple, and the birthrate slows down. It has become a cultural tradition for explorers to always carry a potted sperm plant with them. Sailors have been known to mutiny and force their captains to turn home whenever the potted plant dies. Horticulturalists attempt to create sperm fruit hybrids and succeed, introducing more variety into both the plant and the hominid species.



                      Perhaps the sperm fruit plant is very climate-sensitive. That could be a form of natural population control. In lean times, the plant and the population don't grow as much, so there are fewer new mouths to feed. And it could lead to developing trade between groups that live in areas where the plant will grow and the areas where it won't. This sets up a few different scenarios.




                      1. A global climate catastrophe wipes out 90% of the world's population. Maybe only half of that is wiped out by the actual disaster. The rest simply live their lives and die without the ability to reproduce. Only those isolated areas where the plant can grow have thriving populations. This could lead to development of cultural variations.


                      2. Politics vs. Science - Your hominids have established a clear link between the sperm fruit and reproduction. Now there's a race to create a shelf-stable synthetic version so that they're no longer dependent on the fruit. The government tries to control growth and distribution of the sperm fruit, causing groups of rebels to periodically attempt to steal the plants and/or overthrow the government.


                      3. Space drama - Your scientists haven't yet succeeded in developing alternatives to the sperm fruit. Or they have, but the synthetic version has a short shelf life/is costly to produce. Space colonists must take living sperm fruit plants (either in stasis or specialized terrariums) with them on their colony ships. An alien attacks! A meteor strikes the ship! All but one of the plants are destroyed, and that one is damaged! What will they do? Will the colony survive? The ships's horticulturalist was captured in the attack--will they be able to get him back? Can his daughter, who's angry at being ripped away from all her friend back home, decode his notes and heal the plant? Watch the drama unfold!!!








                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      miltonaut is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer






                      New contributor




                      miltonaut is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                      answered yesterday









                      miltonaut

                      1812




                      1812




                      New contributor




                      miltonaut is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





                      New contributor





                      miltonaut is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                      miltonaut is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                          up vote
                          3
                          down vote













                          These are humanoids so we don't have to modify human men.



                          In their society males, like seahorses raise young.



                          Male seahorse giving birth https://youtu.be/MsHCqrrU-Gk



                          This is very energy expensive so males don't want to be having offspring all the time.



                          However females will wander if they don't get regular sex. Therefore, through evolution, the males have a mechanism for ejaculating only when their previous brood is self-sufficient.






                          share|improve this answer























                          • +1: This is the answer I came to add. Make the young depend on the father for a long stretch of time (e.g. have the father breast feed, or have it that neither mother or father can feed the child alone). natural selection will do the rest, and build in a mechanism that ensures the parents aren't over burdened with children.
                            – Binary Worrier
                            11 hours ago















                          up vote
                          3
                          down vote













                          These are humanoids so we don't have to modify human men.



                          In their society males, like seahorses raise young.



                          Male seahorse giving birth https://youtu.be/MsHCqrrU-Gk



                          This is very energy expensive so males don't want to be having offspring all the time.



                          However females will wander if they don't get regular sex. Therefore, through evolution, the males have a mechanism for ejaculating only when their previous brood is self-sufficient.






                          share|improve this answer























                          • +1: This is the answer I came to add. Make the young depend on the father for a long stretch of time (e.g. have the father breast feed, or have it that neither mother or father can feed the child alone). natural selection will do the rest, and build in a mechanism that ensures the parents aren't over burdened with children.
                            – Binary Worrier
                            11 hours ago













                          up vote
                          3
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          3
                          down vote









                          These are humanoids so we don't have to modify human men.



                          In their society males, like seahorses raise young.



                          Male seahorse giving birth https://youtu.be/MsHCqrrU-Gk



                          This is very energy expensive so males don't want to be having offspring all the time.



                          However females will wander if they don't get regular sex. Therefore, through evolution, the males have a mechanism for ejaculating only when their previous brood is self-sufficient.






                          share|improve this answer














                          These are humanoids so we don't have to modify human men.



                          In their society males, like seahorses raise young.



                          Male seahorse giving birth https://youtu.be/MsHCqrrU-Gk



                          This is very energy expensive so males don't want to be having offspring all the time.



                          However females will wander if they don't get regular sex. Therefore, through evolution, the males have a mechanism for ejaculating only when their previous brood is self-sufficient.







                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited yesterday

























                          answered yesterday









                          chasly from UK

                          6,40222963




                          6,40222963












                          • +1: This is the answer I came to add. Make the young depend on the father for a long stretch of time (e.g. have the father breast feed, or have it that neither mother or father can feed the child alone). natural selection will do the rest, and build in a mechanism that ensures the parents aren't over burdened with children.
                            – Binary Worrier
                            11 hours ago


















                          • +1: This is the answer I came to add. Make the young depend on the father for a long stretch of time (e.g. have the father breast feed, or have it that neither mother or father can feed the child alone). natural selection will do the rest, and build in a mechanism that ensures the parents aren't over burdened with children.
                            – Binary Worrier
                            11 hours ago
















                          +1: This is the answer I came to add. Make the young depend on the father for a long stretch of time (e.g. have the father breast feed, or have it that neither mother or father can feed the child alone). natural selection will do the rest, and build in a mechanism that ensures the parents aren't over burdened with children.
                          – Binary Worrier
                          11 hours ago




                          +1: This is the answer I came to add. Make the young depend on the father for a long stretch of time (e.g. have the father breast feed, or have it that neither mother or father can feed the child alone). natural selection will do the rest, and build in a mechanism that ensures the parents aren't over burdened with children.
                          – Binary Worrier
                          11 hours ago










                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote













                          The testes have a muscle called the cremaster, that pulls them up whenever it's too cold to maintain the right temperature for spermatogenesis (the process which sperm cell are produced), or relaxes to cool the testes whenever it's too hot. Have this process be a lot more temperature dependent, working only when the testes are around the temperature of the body.



                          The cremaster muscle should not be an independent muscle, or involuntary. It should be a voluntary act to contract or relax it, depending if you want to be fertile or not. In this system, you need to pull the testes in advance, maybe some hours prior to sex, in order to have functioning sperm cells.



                          Although you'll have no chance of conception, semen will be produced normally, as the majority of its components is not produced in the testes, but on different locations of male genital tract.






                          share|improve this answer



























                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote













                            The testes have a muscle called the cremaster, that pulls them up whenever it's too cold to maintain the right temperature for spermatogenesis (the process which sperm cell are produced), or relaxes to cool the testes whenever it's too hot. Have this process be a lot more temperature dependent, working only when the testes are around the temperature of the body.



                            The cremaster muscle should not be an independent muscle, or involuntary. It should be a voluntary act to contract or relax it, depending if you want to be fertile or not. In this system, you need to pull the testes in advance, maybe some hours prior to sex, in order to have functioning sperm cells.



                            Although you'll have no chance of conception, semen will be produced normally, as the majority of its components is not produced in the testes, but on different locations of male genital tract.






                            share|improve this answer

























                              up vote
                              1
                              down vote










                              up vote
                              1
                              down vote









                              The testes have a muscle called the cremaster, that pulls them up whenever it's too cold to maintain the right temperature for spermatogenesis (the process which sperm cell are produced), or relaxes to cool the testes whenever it's too hot. Have this process be a lot more temperature dependent, working only when the testes are around the temperature of the body.



                              The cremaster muscle should not be an independent muscle, or involuntary. It should be a voluntary act to contract or relax it, depending if you want to be fertile or not. In this system, you need to pull the testes in advance, maybe some hours prior to sex, in order to have functioning sperm cells.



                              Although you'll have no chance of conception, semen will be produced normally, as the majority of its components is not produced in the testes, but on different locations of male genital tract.






                              share|improve this answer














                              The testes have a muscle called the cremaster, that pulls them up whenever it's too cold to maintain the right temperature for spermatogenesis (the process which sperm cell are produced), or relaxes to cool the testes whenever it's too hot. Have this process be a lot more temperature dependent, working only when the testes are around the temperature of the body.



                              The cremaster muscle should not be an independent muscle, or involuntary. It should be a voluntary act to contract or relax it, depending if you want to be fertile or not. In this system, you need to pull the testes in advance, maybe some hours prior to sex, in order to have functioning sperm cells.



                              Although you'll have no chance of conception, semen will be produced normally, as the majority of its components is not produced in the testes, but on different locations of male genital tract.







                              share|improve this answer














                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer








                              edited yesterday









                              kingledion

                              70.2k24235407




                              70.2k24235407










                              answered yesterday









                              Faed

                              1,576424




                              1,576424






















                                  up vote
                                  1
                                  down vote













                                  Look to the bladder.



                                  The male urethra has two purposes: the ejaculation of semen and the elimination of urine. For most men, these two functions are mutually exclusive; it is difficult to maintain an erection with an extremely full bladder, and urination becomes very difficult when a man has an erection.



                                  Brief anatomy lesson: the urinary and reproductive tracts meet inside the prostate gland, which surrounds the urethra and rests directly below the bladder. The vas deferens carry sperm from the testicles to the prostate, where they merge with the seminal vesicles and join with the urethra via the ejaculatory ducts.



                                  Downstream of the prostate lies the smaller bulbourethral gland. Human urine is acidic and poses a threat to the health of sperm. The bulbourethral gland secretes a slightly alkaline fluid, often colloquially referred to as "precum", which neutralizes the urethra prior to ejaculation. Semen itself is also slightly alkaline in order to neutralize the natural acidity of the vagina.



                                  I can think of two ways that we utilize the confluence of these two systems to achieve the desired effect:




                                  1. Males of your species are capable of urinating and ejaculating simultaneously. If the urine of your species is sufficiently acidic, it will kill the sperm before or shortly after they leave the penis.

                                  2. Males cannot urinate and ejaculate simultaneously, but can choose to urinate at any time and the act of urinating forcibly closes the ejaculatory ducts. In my opinion, this is the more reliable and realistic solution, since the closing of the ducts would prevent urine from entering the vas deferens where it might damage future sperm. However, the sperm would probably leak out afterwards, so caution would need to be exercised in order for this to be truly effective.






                                  share|improve this answer

























                                    up vote
                                    1
                                    down vote













                                    Look to the bladder.



                                    The male urethra has two purposes: the ejaculation of semen and the elimination of urine. For most men, these two functions are mutually exclusive; it is difficult to maintain an erection with an extremely full bladder, and urination becomes very difficult when a man has an erection.



                                    Brief anatomy lesson: the urinary and reproductive tracts meet inside the prostate gland, which surrounds the urethra and rests directly below the bladder. The vas deferens carry sperm from the testicles to the prostate, where they merge with the seminal vesicles and join with the urethra via the ejaculatory ducts.



                                    Downstream of the prostate lies the smaller bulbourethral gland. Human urine is acidic and poses a threat to the health of sperm. The bulbourethral gland secretes a slightly alkaline fluid, often colloquially referred to as "precum", which neutralizes the urethra prior to ejaculation. Semen itself is also slightly alkaline in order to neutralize the natural acidity of the vagina.



                                    I can think of two ways that we utilize the confluence of these two systems to achieve the desired effect:




                                    1. Males of your species are capable of urinating and ejaculating simultaneously. If the urine of your species is sufficiently acidic, it will kill the sperm before or shortly after they leave the penis.

                                    2. Males cannot urinate and ejaculate simultaneously, but can choose to urinate at any time and the act of urinating forcibly closes the ejaculatory ducts. In my opinion, this is the more reliable and realistic solution, since the closing of the ducts would prevent urine from entering the vas deferens where it might damage future sperm. However, the sperm would probably leak out afterwards, so caution would need to be exercised in order for this to be truly effective.






                                    share|improve this answer























                                      up vote
                                      1
                                      down vote










                                      up vote
                                      1
                                      down vote









                                      Look to the bladder.



                                      The male urethra has two purposes: the ejaculation of semen and the elimination of urine. For most men, these two functions are mutually exclusive; it is difficult to maintain an erection with an extremely full bladder, and urination becomes very difficult when a man has an erection.



                                      Brief anatomy lesson: the urinary and reproductive tracts meet inside the prostate gland, which surrounds the urethra and rests directly below the bladder. The vas deferens carry sperm from the testicles to the prostate, where they merge with the seminal vesicles and join with the urethra via the ejaculatory ducts.



                                      Downstream of the prostate lies the smaller bulbourethral gland. Human urine is acidic and poses a threat to the health of sperm. The bulbourethral gland secretes a slightly alkaline fluid, often colloquially referred to as "precum", which neutralizes the urethra prior to ejaculation. Semen itself is also slightly alkaline in order to neutralize the natural acidity of the vagina.



                                      I can think of two ways that we utilize the confluence of these two systems to achieve the desired effect:




                                      1. Males of your species are capable of urinating and ejaculating simultaneously. If the urine of your species is sufficiently acidic, it will kill the sperm before or shortly after they leave the penis.

                                      2. Males cannot urinate and ejaculate simultaneously, but can choose to urinate at any time and the act of urinating forcibly closes the ejaculatory ducts. In my opinion, this is the more reliable and realistic solution, since the closing of the ducts would prevent urine from entering the vas deferens where it might damage future sperm. However, the sperm would probably leak out afterwards, so caution would need to be exercised in order for this to be truly effective.






                                      share|improve this answer












                                      Look to the bladder.



                                      The male urethra has two purposes: the ejaculation of semen and the elimination of urine. For most men, these two functions are mutually exclusive; it is difficult to maintain an erection with an extremely full bladder, and urination becomes very difficult when a man has an erection.



                                      Brief anatomy lesson: the urinary and reproductive tracts meet inside the prostate gland, which surrounds the urethra and rests directly below the bladder. The vas deferens carry sperm from the testicles to the prostate, where they merge with the seminal vesicles and join with the urethra via the ejaculatory ducts.



                                      Downstream of the prostate lies the smaller bulbourethral gland. Human urine is acidic and poses a threat to the health of sperm. The bulbourethral gland secretes a slightly alkaline fluid, often colloquially referred to as "precum", which neutralizes the urethra prior to ejaculation. Semen itself is also slightly alkaline in order to neutralize the natural acidity of the vagina.



                                      I can think of two ways that we utilize the confluence of these two systems to achieve the desired effect:




                                      1. Males of your species are capable of urinating and ejaculating simultaneously. If the urine of your species is sufficiently acidic, it will kill the sperm before or shortly after they leave the penis.

                                      2. Males cannot urinate and ejaculate simultaneously, but can choose to urinate at any time and the act of urinating forcibly closes the ejaculatory ducts. In my opinion, this is the more reliable and realistic solution, since the closing of the ducts would prevent urine from entering the vas deferens where it might damage future sperm. However, the sperm would probably leak out afterwards, so caution would need to be exercised in order for this to be truly effective.







                                      share|improve this answer












                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer










                                      answered 20 hours ago









                                      ApproachingDarknessFish

                                      3,14811744




                                      3,14811744






























                                           

                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded



















































                                           


                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function () {
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f130642%2fhow-can-i-create-a-mechanism-for-natural-reproductive-control-in-males%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                          }
                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          Costa Masnaga

                                          Fotorealismo

                                          Sidney Franklin