Japanese Temple Problem From 1844











up vote
18
down vote

favorite
9












I recently learnt a Japanese geometry temple problem.



The problem is the following:



Five squares are arranged as the image shows. Prove that the area of triangle T and the area of square S are equal.





This is problem 6 in this article.
I am thinking about law of cosines, but I have not been able to prove the theorem. Any hints would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    18
    down vote

    favorite
    9












    I recently learnt a Japanese geometry temple problem.



    The problem is the following:



    Five squares are arranged as the image shows. Prove that the area of triangle T and the area of square S are equal.





    This is problem 6 in this article.
    I am thinking about law of cosines, but I have not been able to prove the theorem. Any hints would be appreciated.










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      18
      down vote

      favorite
      9









      up vote
      18
      down vote

      favorite
      9






      9





      I recently learnt a Japanese geometry temple problem.



      The problem is the following:



      Five squares are arranged as the image shows. Prove that the area of triangle T and the area of square S are equal.





      This is problem 6 in this article.
      I am thinking about law of cosines, but I have not been able to prove the theorem. Any hints would be appreciated.










      share|cite|improve this question















      I recently learnt a Japanese geometry temple problem.



      The problem is the following:



      Five squares are arranged as the image shows. Prove that the area of triangle T and the area of square S are equal.





      This is problem 6 in this article.
      I am thinking about law of cosines, but I have not been able to prove the theorem. Any hints would be appreciated.







      geometry sangaku






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 10 hours ago









      Jean-Claude Arbaut

      14.5k63361




      14.5k63361










      asked 10 hours ago









      Larry

      9341321




      9341321






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          13
          down vote



          accepted










          We will, first of all, prove a very interesting property




          $mathbf{Lemma;1}$



          Given two squares PQRS and PTUV (as shown on the picture), the triangles $Delta STP$ and $Delta PVQ$ have equal area.




          $mathbf {Proof}$



          enter image description here



          Denote by $alpha$ the angle SPT and by $[...]$ the area of the polygon "...". Hence
          $$[Delta STP]=frac{overline {PS}*overline {PT}*sin(alpha)}{2}$$ $$[Delta PVQ]=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}*sinBigl(360°-(90°+90+alpha)Bigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}*sinBigl(180°-alphaBigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}*sin(alpha)}{2}$$



          Since $overline {PS}=overline {PQ}$ and $overline {PT}=overline {PV}$ $$[Delta STP]=[Delta PVQ]$$



          Now, back to the problem



          enter image description here
          Let $overline {AB}=a$ and $overline {IJ}=b$. Note first of all that $$Delta BEC cong Delta EIF$$
          See why? $mathbf {Hint:}$




          It is obvious that $overline {CE}=overline {EF}$. Use the properties of right triangles in order to show that all angles are equal.




          Thus $${(overline{CE})^2}={a^2}+{b^2}=S$$



          Note furthermore that $$[Delta BEC]=[Delta EIF]=frac{ab}{2}$$
          By Lemma 1:
          $$[Delta DCG]=[Delta BEC]=frac{ab}{2}=[Delta EIF]=[Delta GFK]$$
          The area of the polygon AJKGD is thus
          $$[AJKGD]=[ABCD]+[CEFG]+[FIJK]+4[Delta DCG]=2Bigl({a^2}+{b^2}Bigr)+2ab$$



          The area of the trapezoid AJKD is moreover
          $$[AJKD]=frac{(a+b)(2a+2b)}{2}={a^2}+2ab+{b^2}$$



          Finally
          $$T=[Delta DKG]=[AJKGD]-[AJKD]={a^2}+{b^2}=S Rightarrow S=T$$






          share|cite|improve this answer

















          • 1




            Nice. Maybe one can simplify the proof of the Lemma. Rotate $QPV$ by $pi/2$ clokwise around $P$; you get a triangle with the same basis and same heigth as $PST$.
            – D. Thomine
            9 hours ago






          • 2




            +1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer, but I learned a lot from this and wish I could have come up with it myself.
            – J.G.
            8 hours ago










          • @Dr. Mathva: Thank you so much for your answer!
            – Larry
            8 hours ago












          • "+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer" - that's a bit unpleasant
            – Mitch Wheat
            1 hour ago


















          up vote
          3
          down vote













          enter image description here



          $$|square P_1 P_2 P_3 P_4| = (a+b)^2 = frac12(a+b)(2a+2b) = |square Q_1 Q_2 Q_3 Q_4|quad=:R$$




          $$S ;=; R - 4cdotfrac12ab ;=; T$$




          (This space intentionally left blank.)






          share|cite|improve this answer






























            up vote
            2
            down vote













            This is a long comment.



            The shapes $S,,T$ share a vertex $A$ where six angles meet, three of them right angles. The other three angles therefore sum to a right angle. Let $theta$ be the angle in $T$, so the two other acute angles, and the right angle between them from $S$, sum to $pi-theta$. Since $sintheta=sin(pi-theta)$, $T$ has the same area as $triangle ABC$, where $BA,,AC$ are sides of the upper squares.



            The challenge, then, is to show $S$ has that much area too. Let $D$ denote the vertex of $S$ opposite $A$. I suspect we can show the quadrilateral $BACD$ has twice the area of $S$, and also twice the area of $triangle ABC$.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • I don't think that $BACD$ has twice the area of $ABC$. If you try to move $ABC$ by shearing to get a triangle with side $BC$ and something on the bottom line, the third point isn't $D$.
              – D. Thomine
              9 hours ago










            • $BACD$ is a rhombus because its opposite sides are parallel. So it does have twice the area of $ABC$.
              – I like Serena
              9 hours ago










            • $BACD$ is not a rhombus.
              – D. Thomine
              9 hours ago










            • Sorry, I meant parallellogram @D.Thomine.
              – I like Serena
              9 hours ago










            • Not a parallelogram either.
              – D. Thomine
              9 hours ago











            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009635%2fjapanese-temple-problem-from-1844%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            13
            down vote



            accepted










            We will, first of all, prove a very interesting property




            $mathbf{Lemma;1}$



            Given two squares PQRS and PTUV (as shown on the picture), the triangles $Delta STP$ and $Delta PVQ$ have equal area.




            $mathbf {Proof}$



            enter image description here



            Denote by $alpha$ the angle SPT and by $[...]$ the area of the polygon "...". Hence
            $$[Delta STP]=frac{overline {PS}*overline {PT}*sin(alpha)}{2}$$ $$[Delta PVQ]=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}*sinBigl(360°-(90°+90+alpha)Bigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}*sinBigl(180°-alphaBigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}*sin(alpha)}{2}$$



            Since $overline {PS}=overline {PQ}$ and $overline {PT}=overline {PV}$ $$[Delta STP]=[Delta PVQ]$$



            Now, back to the problem



            enter image description here
            Let $overline {AB}=a$ and $overline {IJ}=b$. Note first of all that $$Delta BEC cong Delta EIF$$
            See why? $mathbf {Hint:}$




            It is obvious that $overline {CE}=overline {EF}$. Use the properties of right triangles in order to show that all angles are equal.




            Thus $${(overline{CE})^2}={a^2}+{b^2}=S$$



            Note furthermore that $$[Delta BEC]=[Delta EIF]=frac{ab}{2}$$
            By Lemma 1:
            $$[Delta DCG]=[Delta BEC]=frac{ab}{2}=[Delta EIF]=[Delta GFK]$$
            The area of the polygon AJKGD is thus
            $$[AJKGD]=[ABCD]+[CEFG]+[FIJK]+4[Delta DCG]=2Bigl({a^2}+{b^2}Bigr)+2ab$$



            The area of the trapezoid AJKD is moreover
            $$[AJKD]=frac{(a+b)(2a+2b)}{2}={a^2}+2ab+{b^2}$$



            Finally
            $$T=[Delta DKG]=[AJKGD]-[AJKD]={a^2}+{b^2}=S Rightarrow S=T$$






            share|cite|improve this answer

















            • 1




              Nice. Maybe one can simplify the proof of the Lemma. Rotate $QPV$ by $pi/2$ clokwise around $P$; you get a triangle with the same basis and same heigth as $PST$.
              – D. Thomine
              9 hours ago






            • 2




              +1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer, but I learned a lot from this and wish I could have come up with it myself.
              – J.G.
              8 hours ago










            • @Dr. Mathva: Thank you so much for your answer!
              – Larry
              8 hours ago












            • "+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer" - that's a bit unpleasant
              – Mitch Wheat
              1 hour ago















            up vote
            13
            down vote



            accepted










            We will, first of all, prove a very interesting property




            $mathbf{Lemma;1}$



            Given two squares PQRS and PTUV (as shown on the picture), the triangles $Delta STP$ and $Delta PVQ$ have equal area.




            $mathbf {Proof}$



            enter image description here



            Denote by $alpha$ the angle SPT and by $[...]$ the area of the polygon "...". Hence
            $$[Delta STP]=frac{overline {PS}*overline {PT}*sin(alpha)}{2}$$ $$[Delta PVQ]=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}*sinBigl(360°-(90°+90+alpha)Bigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}*sinBigl(180°-alphaBigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}*sin(alpha)}{2}$$



            Since $overline {PS}=overline {PQ}$ and $overline {PT}=overline {PV}$ $$[Delta STP]=[Delta PVQ]$$



            Now, back to the problem



            enter image description here
            Let $overline {AB}=a$ and $overline {IJ}=b$. Note first of all that $$Delta BEC cong Delta EIF$$
            See why? $mathbf {Hint:}$




            It is obvious that $overline {CE}=overline {EF}$. Use the properties of right triangles in order to show that all angles are equal.




            Thus $${(overline{CE})^2}={a^2}+{b^2}=S$$



            Note furthermore that $$[Delta BEC]=[Delta EIF]=frac{ab}{2}$$
            By Lemma 1:
            $$[Delta DCG]=[Delta BEC]=frac{ab}{2}=[Delta EIF]=[Delta GFK]$$
            The area of the polygon AJKGD is thus
            $$[AJKGD]=[ABCD]+[CEFG]+[FIJK]+4[Delta DCG]=2Bigl({a^2}+{b^2}Bigr)+2ab$$



            The area of the trapezoid AJKD is moreover
            $$[AJKD]=frac{(a+b)(2a+2b)}{2}={a^2}+2ab+{b^2}$$



            Finally
            $$T=[Delta DKG]=[AJKGD]-[AJKD]={a^2}+{b^2}=S Rightarrow S=T$$






            share|cite|improve this answer

















            • 1




              Nice. Maybe one can simplify the proof of the Lemma. Rotate $QPV$ by $pi/2$ clokwise around $P$; you get a triangle with the same basis and same heigth as $PST$.
              – D. Thomine
              9 hours ago






            • 2




              +1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer, but I learned a lot from this and wish I could have come up with it myself.
              – J.G.
              8 hours ago










            • @Dr. Mathva: Thank you so much for your answer!
              – Larry
              8 hours ago












            • "+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer" - that's a bit unpleasant
              – Mitch Wheat
              1 hour ago













            up vote
            13
            down vote



            accepted







            up vote
            13
            down vote



            accepted






            We will, first of all, prove a very interesting property




            $mathbf{Lemma;1}$



            Given two squares PQRS and PTUV (as shown on the picture), the triangles $Delta STP$ and $Delta PVQ$ have equal area.




            $mathbf {Proof}$



            enter image description here



            Denote by $alpha$ the angle SPT and by $[...]$ the area of the polygon "...". Hence
            $$[Delta STP]=frac{overline {PS}*overline {PT}*sin(alpha)}{2}$$ $$[Delta PVQ]=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}*sinBigl(360°-(90°+90+alpha)Bigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}*sinBigl(180°-alphaBigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}*sin(alpha)}{2}$$



            Since $overline {PS}=overline {PQ}$ and $overline {PT}=overline {PV}$ $$[Delta STP]=[Delta PVQ]$$



            Now, back to the problem



            enter image description here
            Let $overline {AB}=a$ and $overline {IJ}=b$. Note first of all that $$Delta BEC cong Delta EIF$$
            See why? $mathbf {Hint:}$




            It is obvious that $overline {CE}=overline {EF}$. Use the properties of right triangles in order to show that all angles are equal.




            Thus $${(overline{CE})^2}={a^2}+{b^2}=S$$



            Note furthermore that $$[Delta BEC]=[Delta EIF]=frac{ab}{2}$$
            By Lemma 1:
            $$[Delta DCG]=[Delta BEC]=frac{ab}{2}=[Delta EIF]=[Delta GFK]$$
            The area of the polygon AJKGD is thus
            $$[AJKGD]=[ABCD]+[CEFG]+[FIJK]+4[Delta DCG]=2Bigl({a^2}+{b^2}Bigr)+2ab$$



            The area of the trapezoid AJKD is moreover
            $$[AJKD]=frac{(a+b)(2a+2b)}{2}={a^2}+2ab+{b^2}$$



            Finally
            $$T=[Delta DKG]=[AJKGD]-[AJKD]={a^2}+{b^2}=S Rightarrow S=T$$






            share|cite|improve this answer












            We will, first of all, prove a very interesting property




            $mathbf{Lemma;1}$



            Given two squares PQRS and PTUV (as shown on the picture), the triangles $Delta STP$ and $Delta PVQ$ have equal area.




            $mathbf {Proof}$



            enter image description here



            Denote by $alpha$ the angle SPT and by $[...]$ the area of the polygon "...". Hence
            $$[Delta STP]=frac{overline {PS}*overline {PT}*sin(alpha)}{2}$$ $$[Delta PVQ]=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}*sinBigl(360°-(90°+90+alpha)Bigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}*sinBigl(180°-alphaBigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}*sin(alpha)}{2}$$



            Since $overline {PS}=overline {PQ}$ and $overline {PT}=overline {PV}$ $$[Delta STP]=[Delta PVQ]$$



            Now, back to the problem



            enter image description here
            Let $overline {AB}=a$ and $overline {IJ}=b$. Note first of all that $$Delta BEC cong Delta EIF$$
            See why? $mathbf {Hint:}$




            It is obvious that $overline {CE}=overline {EF}$. Use the properties of right triangles in order to show that all angles are equal.




            Thus $${(overline{CE})^2}={a^2}+{b^2}=S$$



            Note furthermore that $$[Delta BEC]=[Delta EIF]=frac{ab}{2}$$
            By Lemma 1:
            $$[Delta DCG]=[Delta BEC]=frac{ab}{2}=[Delta EIF]=[Delta GFK]$$
            The area of the polygon AJKGD is thus
            $$[AJKGD]=[ABCD]+[CEFG]+[FIJK]+4[Delta DCG]=2Bigl({a^2}+{b^2}Bigr)+2ab$$



            The area of the trapezoid AJKD is moreover
            $$[AJKD]=frac{(a+b)(2a+2b)}{2}={a^2}+2ab+{b^2}$$



            Finally
            $$T=[Delta DKG]=[AJKGD]-[AJKD]={a^2}+{b^2}=S Rightarrow S=T$$







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 9 hours ago









            Dr. Mathva

            2157




            2157








            • 1




              Nice. Maybe one can simplify the proof of the Lemma. Rotate $QPV$ by $pi/2$ clokwise around $P$; you get a triangle with the same basis and same heigth as $PST$.
              – D. Thomine
              9 hours ago






            • 2




              +1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer, but I learned a lot from this and wish I could have come up with it myself.
              – J.G.
              8 hours ago










            • @Dr. Mathva: Thank you so much for your answer!
              – Larry
              8 hours ago












            • "+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer" - that's a bit unpleasant
              – Mitch Wheat
              1 hour ago














            • 1




              Nice. Maybe one can simplify the proof of the Lemma. Rotate $QPV$ by $pi/2$ clokwise around $P$; you get a triangle with the same basis and same heigth as $PST$.
              – D. Thomine
              9 hours ago






            • 2




              +1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer, but I learned a lot from this and wish I could have come up with it myself.
              – J.G.
              8 hours ago










            • @Dr. Mathva: Thank you so much for your answer!
              – Larry
              8 hours ago












            • "+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer" - that's a bit unpleasant
              – Mitch Wheat
              1 hour ago








            1




            1




            Nice. Maybe one can simplify the proof of the Lemma. Rotate $QPV$ by $pi/2$ clokwise around $P$; you get a triangle with the same basis and same heigth as $PST$.
            – D. Thomine
            9 hours ago




            Nice. Maybe one can simplify the proof of the Lemma. Rotate $QPV$ by $pi/2$ clokwise around $P$; you get a triangle with the same basis and same heigth as $PST$.
            – D. Thomine
            9 hours ago




            2




            2




            +1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer, but I learned a lot from this and wish I could have come up with it myself.
            – J.G.
            8 hours ago




            +1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer, but I learned a lot from this and wish I could have come up with it myself.
            – J.G.
            8 hours ago












            @Dr. Mathva: Thank you so much for your answer!
            – Larry
            8 hours ago






            @Dr. Mathva: Thank you so much for your answer!
            – Larry
            8 hours ago














            "+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer" - that's a bit unpleasant
            – Mitch Wheat
            1 hour ago




            "+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer" - that's a bit unpleasant
            – Mitch Wheat
            1 hour ago










            up vote
            3
            down vote













            enter image description here



            $$|square P_1 P_2 P_3 P_4| = (a+b)^2 = frac12(a+b)(2a+2b) = |square Q_1 Q_2 Q_3 Q_4|quad=:R$$




            $$S ;=; R - 4cdotfrac12ab ;=; T$$




            (This space intentionally left blank.)






            share|cite|improve this answer



























              up vote
              3
              down vote













              enter image description here



              $$|square P_1 P_2 P_3 P_4| = (a+b)^2 = frac12(a+b)(2a+2b) = |square Q_1 Q_2 Q_3 Q_4|quad=:R$$




              $$S ;=; R - 4cdotfrac12ab ;=; T$$




              (This space intentionally left blank.)






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                3
                down vote










                up vote
                3
                down vote









                enter image description here



                $$|square P_1 P_2 P_3 P_4| = (a+b)^2 = frac12(a+b)(2a+2b) = |square Q_1 Q_2 Q_3 Q_4|quad=:R$$




                $$S ;=; R - 4cdotfrac12ab ;=; T$$




                (This space intentionally left blank.)






                share|cite|improve this answer














                enter image description here



                $$|square P_1 P_2 P_3 P_4| = (a+b)^2 = frac12(a+b)(2a+2b) = |square Q_1 Q_2 Q_3 Q_4|quad=:R$$




                $$S ;=; R - 4cdotfrac12ab ;=; T$$




                (This space intentionally left blank.)







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited 58 mins ago

























                answered 3 hours ago









                Blue

                46.3k869146




                46.3k869146






















                    up vote
                    2
                    down vote













                    This is a long comment.



                    The shapes $S,,T$ share a vertex $A$ where six angles meet, three of them right angles. The other three angles therefore sum to a right angle. Let $theta$ be the angle in $T$, so the two other acute angles, and the right angle between them from $S$, sum to $pi-theta$. Since $sintheta=sin(pi-theta)$, $T$ has the same area as $triangle ABC$, where $BA,,AC$ are sides of the upper squares.



                    The challenge, then, is to show $S$ has that much area too. Let $D$ denote the vertex of $S$ opposite $A$. I suspect we can show the quadrilateral $BACD$ has twice the area of $S$, and also twice the area of $triangle ABC$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer





















                    • I don't think that $BACD$ has twice the area of $ABC$. If you try to move $ABC$ by shearing to get a triangle with side $BC$ and something on the bottom line, the third point isn't $D$.
                      – D. Thomine
                      9 hours ago










                    • $BACD$ is a rhombus because its opposite sides are parallel. So it does have twice the area of $ABC$.
                      – I like Serena
                      9 hours ago










                    • $BACD$ is not a rhombus.
                      – D. Thomine
                      9 hours ago










                    • Sorry, I meant parallellogram @D.Thomine.
                      – I like Serena
                      9 hours ago










                    • Not a parallelogram either.
                      – D. Thomine
                      9 hours ago















                    up vote
                    2
                    down vote













                    This is a long comment.



                    The shapes $S,,T$ share a vertex $A$ where six angles meet, three of them right angles. The other three angles therefore sum to a right angle. Let $theta$ be the angle in $T$, so the two other acute angles, and the right angle between them from $S$, sum to $pi-theta$. Since $sintheta=sin(pi-theta)$, $T$ has the same area as $triangle ABC$, where $BA,,AC$ are sides of the upper squares.



                    The challenge, then, is to show $S$ has that much area too. Let $D$ denote the vertex of $S$ opposite $A$. I suspect we can show the quadrilateral $BACD$ has twice the area of $S$, and also twice the area of $triangle ABC$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer





















                    • I don't think that $BACD$ has twice the area of $ABC$. If you try to move $ABC$ by shearing to get a triangle with side $BC$ and something on the bottom line, the third point isn't $D$.
                      – D. Thomine
                      9 hours ago










                    • $BACD$ is a rhombus because its opposite sides are parallel. So it does have twice the area of $ABC$.
                      – I like Serena
                      9 hours ago










                    • $BACD$ is not a rhombus.
                      – D. Thomine
                      9 hours ago










                    • Sorry, I meant parallellogram @D.Thomine.
                      – I like Serena
                      9 hours ago










                    • Not a parallelogram either.
                      – D. Thomine
                      9 hours ago













                    up vote
                    2
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    2
                    down vote









                    This is a long comment.



                    The shapes $S,,T$ share a vertex $A$ where six angles meet, three of them right angles. The other three angles therefore sum to a right angle. Let $theta$ be the angle in $T$, so the two other acute angles, and the right angle between them from $S$, sum to $pi-theta$. Since $sintheta=sin(pi-theta)$, $T$ has the same area as $triangle ABC$, where $BA,,AC$ are sides of the upper squares.



                    The challenge, then, is to show $S$ has that much area too. Let $D$ denote the vertex of $S$ opposite $A$. I suspect we can show the quadrilateral $BACD$ has twice the area of $S$, and also twice the area of $triangle ABC$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    This is a long comment.



                    The shapes $S,,T$ share a vertex $A$ where six angles meet, three of them right angles. The other three angles therefore sum to a right angle. Let $theta$ be the angle in $T$, so the two other acute angles, and the right angle between them from $S$, sum to $pi-theta$. Since $sintheta=sin(pi-theta)$, $T$ has the same area as $triangle ABC$, where $BA,,AC$ are sides of the upper squares.



                    The challenge, then, is to show $S$ has that much area too. Let $D$ denote the vertex of $S$ opposite $A$. I suspect we can show the quadrilateral $BACD$ has twice the area of $S$, and also twice the area of $triangle ABC$.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered 9 hours ago









                    J.G.

                    18.5k21932




                    18.5k21932












                    • I don't think that $BACD$ has twice the area of $ABC$. If you try to move $ABC$ by shearing to get a triangle with side $BC$ and something on the bottom line, the third point isn't $D$.
                      – D. Thomine
                      9 hours ago










                    • $BACD$ is a rhombus because its opposite sides are parallel. So it does have twice the area of $ABC$.
                      – I like Serena
                      9 hours ago










                    • $BACD$ is not a rhombus.
                      – D. Thomine
                      9 hours ago










                    • Sorry, I meant parallellogram @D.Thomine.
                      – I like Serena
                      9 hours ago










                    • Not a parallelogram either.
                      – D. Thomine
                      9 hours ago


















                    • I don't think that $BACD$ has twice the area of $ABC$. If you try to move $ABC$ by shearing to get a triangle with side $BC$ and something on the bottom line, the third point isn't $D$.
                      – D. Thomine
                      9 hours ago










                    • $BACD$ is a rhombus because its opposite sides are parallel. So it does have twice the area of $ABC$.
                      – I like Serena
                      9 hours ago










                    • $BACD$ is not a rhombus.
                      – D. Thomine
                      9 hours ago










                    • Sorry, I meant parallellogram @D.Thomine.
                      – I like Serena
                      9 hours ago










                    • Not a parallelogram either.
                      – D. Thomine
                      9 hours ago
















                    I don't think that $BACD$ has twice the area of $ABC$. If you try to move $ABC$ by shearing to get a triangle with side $BC$ and something on the bottom line, the third point isn't $D$.
                    – D. Thomine
                    9 hours ago




                    I don't think that $BACD$ has twice the area of $ABC$. If you try to move $ABC$ by shearing to get a triangle with side $BC$ and something on the bottom line, the third point isn't $D$.
                    – D. Thomine
                    9 hours ago












                    $BACD$ is a rhombus because its opposite sides are parallel. So it does have twice the area of $ABC$.
                    – I like Serena
                    9 hours ago




                    $BACD$ is a rhombus because its opposite sides are parallel. So it does have twice the area of $ABC$.
                    – I like Serena
                    9 hours ago












                    $BACD$ is not a rhombus.
                    – D. Thomine
                    9 hours ago




                    $BACD$ is not a rhombus.
                    – D. Thomine
                    9 hours ago












                    Sorry, I meant parallellogram @D.Thomine.
                    – I like Serena
                    9 hours ago




                    Sorry, I meant parallellogram @D.Thomine.
                    – I like Serena
                    9 hours ago












                    Not a parallelogram either.
                    – D. Thomine
                    9 hours ago




                    Not a parallelogram either.
                    – D. Thomine
                    9 hours ago


















                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded



















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009635%2fjapanese-temple-problem-from-1844%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Create new schema in PostgreSQL using DBeaver

                    Deepest pit of an array with Javascript: test on Codility

                    Costa Masnaga