Would it be possible to distil specific human emotions into an edible drug form?











up vote
7
down vote

favorite
1












I am writing a dystopian future where I hope to make it possible that specific emotions can be taken in the form of pills or drug form; or, combined pills taken to form more complex feelings. Obviously there are certain chemicals associated with emotions such as serotonin and endorphins. But are there specific chemicals that could be used to create something very close to taking a drug and it giving you an overwhelming sense of sadness, jealousy or rage?



Are there hormones and chemicals specific enough for this, or would it have to be combined with some kind of visual aid to create context to then be able to feel sadness more, for instance? (Although this kid of defeats the point, as in my world these drug forms of emotion are meant to be taken by those incapable of creating it naturally themselves).










share|improve this question









New contributor




Sofie is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • A few years ago I would have written an answer around Lovheim's Cube of Emotions which linked our 8 base emotions to the three mono-amine neuotransmitters. However, it was drawn to my attention that the journal he published in is less than reputable, and little further research had been published. It might still be good eough for worldbuilding though.
    – Cort Ammon
    11 hours ago










  • Here's a suggestion. As I mention in my answer, there's a lot of current research on this. All you need to do is drop in the right buzz-words from this research and it will make even professionals pause to think. As I say, I'll try to help with some of those terms in my answer when I have time.
    – chasly from UK
    10 hours ago












  • Would a smokeable, vapeable, or snortable drug be acceptable? Would a lozenge that you suck on be acceptable? Or a blob that you chew but don't swallow? Drugs that are eaten need to pass through the stomach and duodenum, and then be processed by the liver. This tends to delay the effect, destroy about ninety percent of the drug, and damage the liver. Whereas if the drug can be absorbed by the nose, lungs, or mouth, you get a faster, purer, more intense effect.
    – Jasper
    10 hours ago












  • Even with the near-future tag, your question "are there specific chemicals" seems to be asking for specific chemicals that exist now. If they existed now, someone would be using them, either therapeutically in trials or illegally.
    – RonJohn
    9 hours ago










  • Yeah.. glenlivet do it regularly. If you're male try getting drunk on whisky and see what emotion they bottled. Gin if you're a woman.
    – Richard
    6 hours ago















up vote
7
down vote

favorite
1












I am writing a dystopian future where I hope to make it possible that specific emotions can be taken in the form of pills or drug form; or, combined pills taken to form more complex feelings. Obviously there are certain chemicals associated with emotions such as serotonin and endorphins. But are there specific chemicals that could be used to create something very close to taking a drug and it giving you an overwhelming sense of sadness, jealousy or rage?



Are there hormones and chemicals specific enough for this, or would it have to be combined with some kind of visual aid to create context to then be able to feel sadness more, for instance? (Although this kid of defeats the point, as in my world these drug forms of emotion are meant to be taken by those incapable of creating it naturally themselves).










share|improve this question









New contributor




Sofie is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • A few years ago I would have written an answer around Lovheim's Cube of Emotions which linked our 8 base emotions to the three mono-amine neuotransmitters. However, it was drawn to my attention that the journal he published in is less than reputable, and little further research had been published. It might still be good eough for worldbuilding though.
    – Cort Ammon
    11 hours ago










  • Here's a suggestion. As I mention in my answer, there's a lot of current research on this. All you need to do is drop in the right buzz-words from this research and it will make even professionals pause to think. As I say, I'll try to help with some of those terms in my answer when I have time.
    – chasly from UK
    10 hours ago












  • Would a smokeable, vapeable, or snortable drug be acceptable? Would a lozenge that you suck on be acceptable? Or a blob that you chew but don't swallow? Drugs that are eaten need to pass through the stomach and duodenum, and then be processed by the liver. This tends to delay the effect, destroy about ninety percent of the drug, and damage the liver. Whereas if the drug can be absorbed by the nose, lungs, or mouth, you get a faster, purer, more intense effect.
    – Jasper
    10 hours ago












  • Even with the near-future tag, your question "are there specific chemicals" seems to be asking for specific chemicals that exist now. If they existed now, someone would be using them, either therapeutically in trials or illegally.
    – RonJohn
    9 hours ago










  • Yeah.. glenlivet do it regularly. If you're male try getting drunk on whisky and see what emotion they bottled. Gin if you're a woman.
    – Richard
    6 hours ago













up vote
7
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
7
down vote

favorite
1






1





I am writing a dystopian future where I hope to make it possible that specific emotions can be taken in the form of pills or drug form; or, combined pills taken to form more complex feelings. Obviously there are certain chemicals associated with emotions such as serotonin and endorphins. But are there specific chemicals that could be used to create something very close to taking a drug and it giving you an overwhelming sense of sadness, jealousy or rage?



Are there hormones and chemicals specific enough for this, or would it have to be combined with some kind of visual aid to create context to then be able to feel sadness more, for instance? (Although this kid of defeats the point, as in my world these drug forms of emotion are meant to be taken by those incapable of creating it naturally themselves).










share|improve this question









New contributor




Sofie is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I am writing a dystopian future where I hope to make it possible that specific emotions can be taken in the form of pills or drug form; or, combined pills taken to form more complex feelings. Obviously there are certain chemicals associated with emotions such as serotonin and endorphins. But are there specific chemicals that could be used to create something very close to taking a drug and it giving you an overwhelming sense of sadness, jealousy or rage?



Are there hormones and chemicals specific enough for this, or would it have to be combined with some kind of visual aid to create context to then be able to feel sadness more, for instance? (Although this kid of defeats the point, as in my world these drug forms of emotion are meant to be taken by those incapable of creating it naturally themselves).







science-fiction near-future crime dystopia future






share|improve this question









New contributor




Sofie is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Sofie is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 4 hours ago









kingledion

70.8k24237413




70.8k24237413






New contributor




Sofie is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 11 hours ago









Sofie

361




361




New contributor




Sofie is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Sofie is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Sofie is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • A few years ago I would have written an answer around Lovheim's Cube of Emotions which linked our 8 base emotions to the three mono-amine neuotransmitters. However, it was drawn to my attention that the journal he published in is less than reputable, and little further research had been published. It might still be good eough for worldbuilding though.
    – Cort Ammon
    11 hours ago










  • Here's a suggestion. As I mention in my answer, there's a lot of current research on this. All you need to do is drop in the right buzz-words from this research and it will make even professionals pause to think. As I say, I'll try to help with some of those terms in my answer when I have time.
    – chasly from UK
    10 hours ago












  • Would a smokeable, vapeable, or snortable drug be acceptable? Would a lozenge that you suck on be acceptable? Or a blob that you chew but don't swallow? Drugs that are eaten need to pass through the stomach and duodenum, and then be processed by the liver. This tends to delay the effect, destroy about ninety percent of the drug, and damage the liver. Whereas if the drug can be absorbed by the nose, lungs, or mouth, you get a faster, purer, more intense effect.
    – Jasper
    10 hours ago












  • Even with the near-future tag, your question "are there specific chemicals" seems to be asking for specific chemicals that exist now. If they existed now, someone would be using them, either therapeutically in trials or illegally.
    – RonJohn
    9 hours ago










  • Yeah.. glenlivet do it regularly. If you're male try getting drunk on whisky and see what emotion they bottled. Gin if you're a woman.
    – Richard
    6 hours ago


















  • A few years ago I would have written an answer around Lovheim's Cube of Emotions which linked our 8 base emotions to the three mono-amine neuotransmitters. However, it was drawn to my attention that the journal he published in is less than reputable, and little further research had been published. It might still be good eough for worldbuilding though.
    – Cort Ammon
    11 hours ago










  • Here's a suggestion. As I mention in my answer, there's a lot of current research on this. All you need to do is drop in the right buzz-words from this research and it will make even professionals pause to think. As I say, I'll try to help with some of those terms in my answer when I have time.
    – chasly from UK
    10 hours ago












  • Would a smokeable, vapeable, or snortable drug be acceptable? Would a lozenge that you suck on be acceptable? Or a blob that you chew but don't swallow? Drugs that are eaten need to pass through the stomach and duodenum, and then be processed by the liver. This tends to delay the effect, destroy about ninety percent of the drug, and damage the liver. Whereas if the drug can be absorbed by the nose, lungs, or mouth, you get a faster, purer, more intense effect.
    – Jasper
    10 hours ago












  • Even with the near-future tag, your question "are there specific chemicals" seems to be asking for specific chemicals that exist now. If they existed now, someone would be using them, either therapeutically in trials or illegally.
    – RonJohn
    9 hours ago










  • Yeah.. glenlivet do it regularly. If you're male try getting drunk on whisky and see what emotion they bottled. Gin if you're a woman.
    – Richard
    6 hours ago
















A few years ago I would have written an answer around Lovheim's Cube of Emotions which linked our 8 base emotions to the three mono-amine neuotransmitters. However, it was drawn to my attention that the journal he published in is less than reputable, and little further research had been published. It might still be good eough for worldbuilding though.
– Cort Ammon
11 hours ago




A few years ago I would have written an answer around Lovheim's Cube of Emotions which linked our 8 base emotions to the three mono-amine neuotransmitters. However, it was drawn to my attention that the journal he published in is less than reputable, and little further research had been published. It might still be good eough for worldbuilding though.
– Cort Ammon
11 hours ago












Here's a suggestion. As I mention in my answer, there's a lot of current research on this. All you need to do is drop in the right buzz-words from this research and it will make even professionals pause to think. As I say, I'll try to help with some of those terms in my answer when I have time.
– chasly from UK
10 hours ago






Here's a suggestion. As I mention in my answer, there's a lot of current research on this. All you need to do is drop in the right buzz-words from this research and it will make even professionals pause to think. As I say, I'll try to help with some of those terms in my answer when I have time.
– chasly from UK
10 hours ago














Would a smokeable, vapeable, or snortable drug be acceptable? Would a lozenge that you suck on be acceptable? Or a blob that you chew but don't swallow? Drugs that are eaten need to pass through the stomach and duodenum, and then be processed by the liver. This tends to delay the effect, destroy about ninety percent of the drug, and damage the liver. Whereas if the drug can be absorbed by the nose, lungs, or mouth, you get a faster, purer, more intense effect.
– Jasper
10 hours ago






Would a smokeable, vapeable, or snortable drug be acceptable? Would a lozenge that you suck on be acceptable? Or a blob that you chew but don't swallow? Drugs that are eaten need to pass through the stomach and duodenum, and then be processed by the liver. This tends to delay the effect, destroy about ninety percent of the drug, and damage the liver. Whereas if the drug can be absorbed by the nose, lungs, or mouth, you get a faster, purer, more intense effect.
– Jasper
10 hours ago














Even with the near-future tag, your question "are there specific chemicals" seems to be asking for specific chemicals that exist now. If they existed now, someone would be using them, either therapeutically in trials or illegally.
– RonJohn
9 hours ago




Even with the near-future tag, your question "are there specific chemicals" seems to be asking for specific chemicals that exist now. If they existed now, someone would be using them, either therapeutically in trials or illegally.
– RonJohn
9 hours ago












Yeah.. glenlivet do it regularly. If you're male try getting drunk on whisky and see what emotion they bottled. Gin if you're a woman.
– Richard
6 hours ago




Yeah.. glenlivet do it regularly. If you're male try getting drunk on whisky and see what emotion they bottled. Gin if you're a woman.
– Richard
6 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote













This is a big area of research at the moment. (I'll add some pointers to research as and when I'm online)



The answer is almost certainly yes but there is a long way to go. However it will rely on drugs that can be accurately targeted.



EDIT - to clarify
If you could isolate the chemicals in a human brain and inject those same chemicals into the brain of another person, but precisely into the same brain structures then I assert that the second person would experience the same emotions. Once we know what all these chemicals are and where to send them then with sufficient (very advanced) technology, we could replicate the same.
We couldn't replicate the other person's thoughts - just the emotions.
This might require nano-machines (also currently being worked on) to make sure the drugs were accurately delivered.



At present if someone takes an antidepressant or an amphetamine it floods the whole system and not just the brain (there may be some preferential uptake). There are centres in the brain (still not fully understood) which when stimulated by an electrode can cause changes in emotion.



It's complicated because a drug that causes excitation in one sort of synapse in one organ can suppress it in another.



Once the technology to precisely target small brain centres is achieved then your scenario is possible.



Notes



You didn't give a hard-science tag (thank goodness!) so I am relying on remembered facts from studies some time ago.



If someone paid me I could probably back my answer up with the relevant research but it would perhaps take hours. Maybe I'll find some pointers that I can add on here for you to read up on.



Provisos




  1. Some emotions can be very close to each other in physiological terms - for example mild fear and excitement (both involve adrenaline). It may be necessary for the subject to prepare mentally or hypnotically to avoid a 'bad trip'. However there are different brain structures that could be stimulated in addition to merely giving adrenaline. The combination could distinguish between fear and excitement. So a complex targeted drug could work.


  2. Pleasant emotions could be very addictive.


  3. The pills may have undesirable long-term effects.







share|improve this answer























  • Actually they don't. Some neuro-active substances are produced locally and are fed to their specific target. Others have a wider effect. It's incredibly complicated so we would have to understand the interactions much better than we currently do. You haven't defined 'naturally happy' that's a woolly concept.
    – chasly from UK
    11 hours ago










  • It's 'happy' I'm objecting to. Happiness isn't a single emotion or feeling. Crystal meth creates a general sense of well-being. Winning the lottery may create a sense of well-being. Neither leads to long-term happiness. Definitions of emotions is quite hard but in future may be less so.
    – chasly from UK
    10 hours ago












  • Grrr ... I don't really want to spend hours doing this. Neurotransmitters in general don't float around. They act incredibly locally, i.e. in the synapse between two neurons. On the other hand Nitrous oxide spreads very easily through the whole brain.
    – chasly from UK
    10 hours ago










  • NOTE - My above comments were in response to now deleted ones.
    – chasly from UK
    8 hours ago










  • Then you should delete your comments, and add any important parts to your answer. Comments are ephemeral, make sure the important points get added to the permanent record of your answer.
    – kingledion
    4 hours ago


















up vote
3
down vote













Some psychiatric medication is used to change the affect of patients: anti-depressants diminish sadness, depressants diminish joy, anxyolitics reduce fear, anxiogenics increase fear, there are drugs that make aggressive and drugs that reduce aggression, and so on.



The problem with all of this is that every human brain is different, and that not everyone reacts to the same drug in the same way. Which is why there are so many different anti-depressants, for example, and why for some patients none of them work (or not in the expected way or not without adverse effects).



So while it is easily possible to create a drug that will induce a specific emotion in a single individual (given enough time to research that individual), it is impossible to create a drug that will have the same effect on everyone.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




user57423 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















  • This is true at the current state of technology and understanding. The problem is that current drugs are a hammer to crack a nut. All sorts of unwanted side-effects may be caused. - In the OP's dystopian future sufficiently selective, targeted and sophisticated drugs could do it. Right now in 2018 people are working on tailoring drugs to a patient's DNA. This taken to its extreme could give very precise results. Take a blood sample, stuff it in the analyser and the specific cocktail of drugs for you pops out.
    – chasly from UK
    11 hours ago




















up vote
1
down vote













Not really, since there's a mental component to feelings. Basically, you need something to be sad*, jealous, or mad about to get the full emotional effects. If you've ever had allergy testing, you might actually have experienced something like this. When the tests are finished, the doctor gives you a shot of adrenaline https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adrenaline to counteract any lingering effects. This of course is the same hormone evoked in "fight or flight" situations, so you experience the physical component of the emotional response, without there being anything to fight or run away from.



*Though see depression and the use of antidepressants.






share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    I think there might be a way.



    As other answers have mentioned, emotional responses are pretty complicated things.



    Some emotions are more readily induced or modulated than others, and the more complex the emotion the more complex the means of effecting it needs to be.



    Some real-world foods can make you happier some of the time simply because they're high in carbs. High-carb foods reduce stress hormone release in the brain.



    As has been mentioned already, getting very precise at this point seems to require access to the inside of the brain itself and being able to distinguish between and selectively modify specific regions in specific ways.



    The solution depends on how techy you want your story to be. If you're both going for a super high tech/robotic setting and want accuracy, you could use nanobots that migrate to specific regions of the brain on their own over time, then receive signals of some form or other in order to provide the necessary response.



    ie:



    acquire nanobots



    nanobots migrate to their specified locations



    nanobots recieve signal



    appropriate nanobots release/trigger release of appropriate neurotransmitters



    This signal could come in various forms and could even be food if you figured out how to send specific messages to the various nanobots based on food consumed.



    Maybe you could just find some set of neutral compounds that don't exist in food/other ingestables and have a different set of nanobots in the digestive tract that detect the presence of those and their relative proportions, interpret those proportions as a specific emotional response, then send the correct message to the nanobots in the brain.



    Some kind of wireless mesh network between the nanobots might be able to simplify this whole system enormously, but I'm not sure how capable those wireless systems would actually be. Range in particular would be an issue between the stomach/intestines and the brain. This might be solvable with some kind of relay network across that distance.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Ajacmac is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.


















      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "579"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });






      Sofie is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f131021%2fwould-it-be-possible-to-distil-specific-human-emotions-into-an-edible-drug-form%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      4
      down vote













      This is a big area of research at the moment. (I'll add some pointers to research as and when I'm online)



      The answer is almost certainly yes but there is a long way to go. However it will rely on drugs that can be accurately targeted.



      EDIT - to clarify
      If you could isolate the chemicals in a human brain and inject those same chemicals into the brain of another person, but precisely into the same brain structures then I assert that the second person would experience the same emotions. Once we know what all these chemicals are and where to send them then with sufficient (very advanced) technology, we could replicate the same.
      We couldn't replicate the other person's thoughts - just the emotions.
      This might require nano-machines (also currently being worked on) to make sure the drugs were accurately delivered.



      At present if someone takes an antidepressant or an amphetamine it floods the whole system and not just the brain (there may be some preferential uptake). There are centres in the brain (still not fully understood) which when stimulated by an electrode can cause changes in emotion.



      It's complicated because a drug that causes excitation in one sort of synapse in one organ can suppress it in another.



      Once the technology to precisely target small brain centres is achieved then your scenario is possible.



      Notes



      You didn't give a hard-science tag (thank goodness!) so I am relying on remembered facts from studies some time ago.



      If someone paid me I could probably back my answer up with the relevant research but it would perhaps take hours. Maybe I'll find some pointers that I can add on here for you to read up on.



      Provisos




      1. Some emotions can be very close to each other in physiological terms - for example mild fear and excitement (both involve adrenaline). It may be necessary for the subject to prepare mentally or hypnotically to avoid a 'bad trip'. However there are different brain structures that could be stimulated in addition to merely giving adrenaline. The combination could distinguish between fear and excitement. So a complex targeted drug could work.


      2. Pleasant emotions could be very addictive.


      3. The pills may have undesirable long-term effects.







      share|improve this answer























      • Actually they don't. Some neuro-active substances are produced locally and are fed to their specific target. Others have a wider effect. It's incredibly complicated so we would have to understand the interactions much better than we currently do. You haven't defined 'naturally happy' that's a woolly concept.
        – chasly from UK
        11 hours ago










      • It's 'happy' I'm objecting to. Happiness isn't a single emotion or feeling. Crystal meth creates a general sense of well-being. Winning the lottery may create a sense of well-being. Neither leads to long-term happiness. Definitions of emotions is quite hard but in future may be less so.
        – chasly from UK
        10 hours ago












      • Grrr ... I don't really want to spend hours doing this. Neurotransmitters in general don't float around. They act incredibly locally, i.e. in the synapse between two neurons. On the other hand Nitrous oxide spreads very easily through the whole brain.
        – chasly from UK
        10 hours ago










      • NOTE - My above comments were in response to now deleted ones.
        – chasly from UK
        8 hours ago










      • Then you should delete your comments, and add any important parts to your answer. Comments are ephemeral, make sure the important points get added to the permanent record of your answer.
        – kingledion
        4 hours ago















      up vote
      4
      down vote













      This is a big area of research at the moment. (I'll add some pointers to research as and when I'm online)



      The answer is almost certainly yes but there is a long way to go. However it will rely on drugs that can be accurately targeted.



      EDIT - to clarify
      If you could isolate the chemicals in a human brain and inject those same chemicals into the brain of another person, but precisely into the same brain structures then I assert that the second person would experience the same emotions. Once we know what all these chemicals are and where to send them then with sufficient (very advanced) technology, we could replicate the same.
      We couldn't replicate the other person's thoughts - just the emotions.
      This might require nano-machines (also currently being worked on) to make sure the drugs were accurately delivered.



      At present if someone takes an antidepressant or an amphetamine it floods the whole system and not just the brain (there may be some preferential uptake). There are centres in the brain (still not fully understood) which when stimulated by an electrode can cause changes in emotion.



      It's complicated because a drug that causes excitation in one sort of synapse in one organ can suppress it in another.



      Once the technology to precisely target small brain centres is achieved then your scenario is possible.



      Notes



      You didn't give a hard-science tag (thank goodness!) so I am relying on remembered facts from studies some time ago.



      If someone paid me I could probably back my answer up with the relevant research but it would perhaps take hours. Maybe I'll find some pointers that I can add on here for you to read up on.



      Provisos




      1. Some emotions can be very close to each other in physiological terms - for example mild fear and excitement (both involve adrenaline). It may be necessary for the subject to prepare mentally or hypnotically to avoid a 'bad trip'. However there are different brain structures that could be stimulated in addition to merely giving adrenaline. The combination could distinguish between fear and excitement. So a complex targeted drug could work.


      2. Pleasant emotions could be very addictive.


      3. The pills may have undesirable long-term effects.







      share|improve this answer























      • Actually they don't. Some neuro-active substances are produced locally and are fed to their specific target. Others have a wider effect. It's incredibly complicated so we would have to understand the interactions much better than we currently do. You haven't defined 'naturally happy' that's a woolly concept.
        – chasly from UK
        11 hours ago










      • It's 'happy' I'm objecting to. Happiness isn't a single emotion or feeling. Crystal meth creates a general sense of well-being. Winning the lottery may create a sense of well-being. Neither leads to long-term happiness. Definitions of emotions is quite hard but in future may be less so.
        – chasly from UK
        10 hours ago












      • Grrr ... I don't really want to spend hours doing this. Neurotransmitters in general don't float around. They act incredibly locally, i.e. in the synapse between two neurons. On the other hand Nitrous oxide spreads very easily through the whole brain.
        – chasly from UK
        10 hours ago










      • NOTE - My above comments were in response to now deleted ones.
        – chasly from UK
        8 hours ago










      • Then you should delete your comments, and add any important parts to your answer. Comments are ephemeral, make sure the important points get added to the permanent record of your answer.
        – kingledion
        4 hours ago













      up vote
      4
      down vote










      up vote
      4
      down vote









      This is a big area of research at the moment. (I'll add some pointers to research as and when I'm online)



      The answer is almost certainly yes but there is a long way to go. However it will rely on drugs that can be accurately targeted.



      EDIT - to clarify
      If you could isolate the chemicals in a human brain and inject those same chemicals into the brain of another person, but precisely into the same brain structures then I assert that the second person would experience the same emotions. Once we know what all these chemicals are and where to send them then with sufficient (very advanced) technology, we could replicate the same.
      We couldn't replicate the other person's thoughts - just the emotions.
      This might require nano-machines (also currently being worked on) to make sure the drugs were accurately delivered.



      At present if someone takes an antidepressant or an amphetamine it floods the whole system and not just the brain (there may be some preferential uptake). There are centres in the brain (still not fully understood) which when stimulated by an electrode can cause changes in emotion.



      It's complicated because a drug that causes excitation in one sort of synapse in one organ can suppress it in another.



      Once the technology to precisely target small brain centres is achieved then your scenario is possible.



      Notes



      You didn't give a hard-science tag (thank goodness!) so I am relying on remembered facts from studies some time ago.



      If someone paid me I could probably back my answer up with the relevant research but it would perhaps take hours. Maybe I'll find some pointers that I can add on here for you to read up on.



      Provisos




      1. Some emotions can be very close to each other in physiological terms - for example mild fear and excitement (both involve adrenaline). It may be necessary for the subject to prepare mentally or hypnotically to avoid a 'bad trip'. However there are different brain structures that could be stimulated in addition to merely giving adrenaline. The combination could distinguish between fear and excitement. So a complex targeted drug could work.


      2. Pleasant emotions could be very addictive.


      3. The pills may have undesirable long-term effects.







      share|improve this answer














      This is a big area of research at the moment. (I'll add some pointers to research as and when I'm online)



      The answer is almost certainly yes but there is a long way to go. However it will rely on drugs that can be accurately targeted.



      EDIT - to clarify
      If you could isolate the chemicals in a human brain and inject those same chemicals into the brain of another person, but precisely into the same brain structures then I assert that the second person would experience the same emotions. Once we know what all these chemicals are and where to send them then with sufficient (very advanced) technology, we could replicate the same.
      We couldn't replicate the other person's thoughts - just the emotions.
      This might require nano-machines (also currently being worked on) to make sure the drugs were accurately delivered.



      At present if someone takes an antidepressant or an amphetamine it floods the whole system and not just the brain (there may be some preferential uptake). There are centres in the brain (still not fully understood) which when stimulated by an electrode can cause changes in emotion.



      It's complicated because a drug that causes excitation in one sort of synapse in one organ can suppress it in another.



      Once the technology to precisely target small brain centres is achieved then your scenario is possible.



      Notes



      You didn't give a hard-science tag (thank goodness!) so I am relying on remembered facts from studies some time ago.



      If someone paid me I could probably back my answer up with the relevant research but it would perhaps take hours. Maybe I'll find some pointers that I can add on here for you to read up on.



      Provisos




      1. Some emotions can be very close to each other in physiological terms - for example mild fear and excitement (both involve adrenaline). It may be necessary for the subject to prepare mentally or hypnotically to avoid a 'bad trip'. However there are different brain structures that could be stimulated in addition to merely giving adrenaline. The combination could distinguish between fear and excitement. So a complex targeted drug could work.


      2. Pleasant emotions could be very addictive.


      3. The pills may have undesirable long-term effects.








      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 10 hours ago

























      answered 11 hours ago









      chasly from UK

      7,05523473




      7,05523473












      • Actually they don't. Some neuro-active substances are produced locally and are fed to their specific target. Others have a wider effect. It's incredibly complicated so we would have to understand the interactions much better than we currently do. You haven't defined 'naturally happy' that's a woolly concept.
        – chasly from UK
        11 hours ago










      • It's 'happy' I'm objecting to. Happiness isn't a single emotion or feeling. Crystal meth creates a general sense of well-being. Winning the lottery may create a sense of well-being. Neither leads to long-term happiness. Definitions of emotions is quite hard but in future may be less so.
        – chasly from UK
        10 hours ago












      • Grrr ... I don't really want to spend hours doing this. Neurotransmitters in general don't float around. They act incredibly locally, i.e. in the synapse between two neurons. On the other hand Nitrous oxide spreads very easily through the whole brain.
        – chasly from UK
        10 hours ago










      • NOTE - My above comments were in response to now deleted ones.
        – chasly from UK
        8 hours ago










      • Then you should delete your comments, and add any important parts to your answer. Comments are ephemeral, make sure the important points get added to the permanent record of your answer.
        – kingledion
        4 hours ago


















      • Actually they don't. Some neuro-active substances are produced locally and are fed to their specific target. Others have a wider effect. It's incredibly complicated so we would have to understand the interactions much better than we currently do. You haven't defined 'naturally happy' that's a woolly concept.
        – chasly from UK
        11 hours ago










      • It's 'happy' I'm objecting to. Happiness isn't a single emotion or feeling. Crystal meth creates a general sense of well-being. Winning the lottery may create a sense of well-being. Neither leads to long-term happiness. Definitions of emotions is quite hard but in future may be less so.
        – chasly from UK
        10 hours ago












      • Grrr ... I don't really want to spend hours doing this. Neurotransmitters in general don't float around. They act incredibly locally, i.e. in the synapse between two neurons. On the other hand Nitrous oxide spreads very easily through the whole brain.
        – chasly from UK
        10 hours ago










      • NOTE - My above comments were in response to now deleted ones.
        – chasly from UK
        8 hours ago










      • Then you should delete your comments, and add any important parts to your answer. Comments are ephemeral, make sure the important points get added to the permanent record of your answer.
        – kingledion
        4 hours ago
















      Actually they don't. Some neuro-active substances are produced locally and are fed to their specific target. Others have a wider effect. It's incredibly complicated so we would have to understand the interactions much better than we currently do. You haven't defined 'naturally happy' that's a woolly concept.
      – chasly from UK
      11 hours ago




      Actually they don't. Some neuro-active substances are produced locally and are fed to their specific target. Others have a wider effect. It's incredibly complicated so we would have to understand the interactions much better than we currently do. You haven't defined 'naturally happy' that's a woolly concept.
      – chasly from UK
      11 hours ago












      It's 'happy' I'm objecting to. Happiness isn't a single emotion or feeling. Crystal meth creates a general sense of well-being. Winning the lottery may create a sense of well-being. Neither leads to long-term happiness. Definitions of emotions is quite hard but in future may be less so.
      – chasly from UK
      10 hours ago






      It's 'happy' I'm objecting to. Happiness isn't a single emotion or feeling. Crystal meth creates a general sense of well-being. Winning the lottery may create a sense of well-being. Neither leads to long-term happiness. Definitions of emotions is quite hard but in future may be less so.
      – chasly from UK
      10 hours ago














      Grrr ... I don't really want to spend hours doing this. Neurotransmitters in general don't float around. They act incredibly locally, i.e. in the synapse between two neurons. On the other hand Nitrous oxide spreads very easily through the whole brain.
      – chasly from UK
      10 hours ago




      Grrr ... I don't really want to spend hours doing this. Neurotransmitters in general don't float around. They act incredibly locally, i.e. in the synapse between two neurons. On the other hand Nitrous oxide spreads very easily through the whole brain.
      – chasly from UK
      10 hours ago












      NOTE - My above comments were in response to now deleted ones.
      – chasly from UK
      8 hours ago




      NOTE - My above comments were in response to now deleted ones.
      – chasly from UK
      8 hours ago












      Then you should delete your comments, and add any important parts to your answer. Comments are ephemeral, make sure the important points get added to the permanent record of your answer.
      – kingledion
      4 hours ago




      Then you should delete your comments, and add any important parts to your answer. Comments are ephemeral, make sure the important points get added to the permanent record of your answer.
      – kingledion
      4 hours ago










      up vote
      3
      down vote













      Some psychiatric medication is used to change the affect of patients: anti-depressants diminish sadness, depressants diminish joy, anxyolitics reduce fear, anxiogenics increase fear, there are drugs that make aggressive and drugs that reduce aggression, and so on.



      The problem with all of this is that every human brain is different, and that not everyone reacts to the same drug in the same way. Which is why there are so many different anti-depressants, for example, and why for some patients none of them work (or not in the expected way or not without adverse effects).



      So while it is easily possible to create a drug that will induce a specific emotion in a single individual (given enough time to research that individual), it is impossible to create a drug that will have the same effect on everyone.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      user57423 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.


















      • This is true at the current state of technology and understanding. The problem is that current drugs are a hammer to crack a nut. All sorts of unwanted side-effects may be caused. - In the OP's dystopian future sufficiently selective, targeted and sophisticated drugs could do it. Right now in 2018 people are working on tailoring drugs to a patient's DNA. This taken to its extreme could give very precise results. Take a blood sample, stuff it in the analyser and the specific cocktail of drugs for you pops out.
        – chasly from UK
        11 hours ago

















      up vote
      3
      down vote













      Some psychiatric medication is used to change the affect of patients: anti-depressants diminish sadness, depressants diminish joy, anxyolitics reduce fear, anxiogenics increase fear, there are drugs that make aggressive and drugs that reduce aggression, and so on.



      The problem with all of this is that every human brain is different, and that not everyone reacts to the same drug in the same way. Which is why there are so many different anti-depressants, for example, and why for some patients none of them work (or not in the expected way or not without adverse effects).



      So while it is easily possible to create a drug that will induce a specific emotion in a single individual (given enough time to research that individual), it is impossible to create a drug that will have the same effect on everyone.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      user57423 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.


















      • This is true at the current state of technology and understanding. The problem is that current drugs are a hammer to crack a nut. All sorts of unwanted side-effects may be caused. - In the OP's dystopian future sufficiently selective, targeted and sophisticated drugs could do it. Right now in 2018 people are working on tailoring drugs to a patient's DNA. This taken to its extreme could give very precise results. Take a blood sample, stuff it in the analyser and the specific cocktail of drugs for you pops out.
        – chasly from UK
        11 hours ago















      up vote
      3
      down vote










      up vote
      3
      down vote









      Some psychiatric medication is used to change the affect of patients: anti-depressants diminish sadness, depressants diminish joy, anxyolitics reduce fear, anxiogenics increase fear, there are drugs that make aggressive and drugs that reduce aggression, and so on.



      The problem with all of this is that every human brain is different, and that not everyone reacts to the same drug in the same way. Which is why there are so many different anti-depressants, for example, and why for some patients none of them work (or not in the expected way or not without adverse effects).



      So while it is easily possible to create a drug that will induce a specific emotion in a single individual (given enough time to research that individual), it is impossible to create a drug that will have the same effect on everyone.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      user57423 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      Some psychiatric medication is used to change the affect of patients: anti-depressants diminish sadness, depressants diminish joy, anxyolitics reduce fear, anxiogenics increase fear, there are drugs that make aggressive and drugs that reduce aggression, and so on.



      The problem with all of this is that every human brain is different, and that not everyone reacts to the same drug in the same way. Which is why there are so many different anti-depressants, for example, and why for some patients none of them work (or not in the expected way or not without adverse effects).



      So while it is easily possible to create a drug that will induce a specific emotion in a single individual (given enough time to research that individual), it is impossible to create a drug that will have the same effect on everyone.







      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      user57423 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer






      New contributor




      user57423 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      answered 11 hours ago









      user57423

      31519




      31519




      New contributor




      user57423 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      user57423 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      user57423 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      • This is true at the current state of technology and understanding. The problem is that current drugs are a hammer to crack a nut. All sorts of unwanted side-effects may be caused. - In the OP's dystopian future sufficiently selective, targeted and sophisticated drugs could do it. Right now in 2018 people are working on tailoring drugs to a patient's DNA. This taken to its extreme could give very precise results. Take a blood sample, stuff it in the analyser and the specific cocktail of drugs for you pops out.
        – chasly from UK
        11 hours ago




















      • This is true at the current state of technology and understanding. The problem is that current drugs are a hammer to crack a nut. All sorts of unwanted side-effects may be caused. - In the OP's dystopian future sufficiently selective, targeted and sophisticated drugs could do it. Right now in 2018 people are working on tailoring drugs to a patient's DNA. This taken to its extreme could give very precise results. Take a blood sample, stuff it in the analyser and the specific cocktail of drugs for you pops out.
        – chasly from UK
        11 hours ago


















      This is true at the current state of technology and understanding. The problem is that current drugs are a hammer to crack a nut. All sorts of unwanted side-effects may be caused. - In the OP's dystopian future sufficiently selective, targeted and sophisticated drugs could do it. Right now in 2018 people are working on tailoring drugs to a patient's DNA. This taken to its extreme could give very precise results. Take a blood sample, stuff it in the analyser and the specific cocktail of drugs for you pops out.
      – chasly from UK
      11 hours ago






      This is true at the current state of technology and understanding. The problem is that current drugs are a hammer to crack a nut. All sorts of unwanted side-effects may be caused. - In the OP's dystopian future sufficiently selective, targeted and sophisticated drugs could do it. Right now in 2018 people are working on tailoring drugs to a patient's DNA. This taken to its extreme could give very precise results. Take a blood sample, stuff it in the analyser and the specific cocktail of drugs for you pops out.
      – chasly from UK
      11 hours ago












      up vote
      1
      down vote













      Not really, since there's a mental component to feelings. Basically, you need something to be sad*, jealous, or mad about to get the full emotional effects. If you've ever had allergy testing, you might actually have experienced something like this. When the tests are finished, the doctor gives you a shot of adrenaline https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adrenaline to counteract any lingering effects. This of course is the same hormone evoked in "fight or flight" situations, so you experience the physical component of the emotional response, without there being anything to fight or run away from.



      *Though see depression and the use of antidepressants.






      share|improve this answer

























        up vote
        1
        down vote













        Not really, since there's a mental component to feelings. Basically, you need something to be sad*, jealous, or mad about to get the full emotional effects. If you've ever had allergy testing, you might actually have experienced something like this. When the tests are finished, the doctor gives you a shot of adrenaline https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adrenaline to counteract any lingering effects. This of course is the same hormone evoked in "fight or flight" situations, so you experience the physical component of the emotional response, without there being anything to fight or run away from.



        *Though see depression and the use of antidepressants.






        share|improve this answer























          up vote
          1
          down vote










          up vote
          1
          down vote









          Not really, since there's a mental component to feelings. Basically, you need something to be sad*, jealous, or mad about to get the full emotional effects. If you've ever had allergy testing, you might actually have experienced something like this. When the tests are finished, the doctor gives you a shot of adrenaline https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adrenaline to counteract any lingering effects. This of course is the same hormone evoked in "fight or flight" situations, so you experience the physical component of the emotional response, without there being anything to fight or run away from.



          *Though see depression and the use of antidepressants.






          share|improve this answer












          Not really, since there's a mental component to feelings. Basically, you need something to be sad*, jealous, or mad about to get the full emotional effects. If you've ever had allergy testing, you might actually have experienced something like this. When the tests are finished, the doctor gives you a shot of adrenaline https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adrenaline to counteract any lingering effects. This of course is the same hormone evoked in "fight or flight" situations, so you experience the physical component of the emotional response, without there being anything to fight or run away from.



          *Though see depression and the use of antidepressants.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 11 hours ago









          jamesqf

          9,17011734




          9,17011734






















              up vote
              0
              down vote













              I think there might be a way.



              As other answers have mentioned, emotional responses are pretty complicated things.



              Some emotions are more readily induced or modulated than others, and the more complex the emotion the more complex the means of effecting it needs to be.



              Some real-world foods can make you happier some of the time simply because they're high in carbs. High-carb foods reduce stress hormone release in the brain.



              As has been mentioned already, getting very precise at this point seems to require access to the inside of the brain itself and being able to distinguish between and selectively modify specific regions in specific ways.



              The solution depends on how techy you want your story to be. If you're both going for a super high tech/robotic setting and want accuracy, you could use nanobots that migrate to specific regions of the brain on their own over time, then receive signals of some form or other in order to provide the necessary response.



              ie:



              acquire nanobots



              nanobots migrate to their specified locations



              nanobots recieve signal



              appropriate nanobots release/trigger release of appropriate neurotransmitters



              This signal could come in various forms and could even be food if you figured out how to send specific messages to the various nanobots based on food consumed.



              Maybe you could just find some set of neutral compounds that don't exist in food/other ingestables and have a different set of nanobots in the digestive tract that detect the presence of those and their relative proportions, interpret those proportions as a specific emotional response, then send the correct message to the nanobots in the brain.



              Some kind of wireless mesh network between the nanobots might be able to simplify this whole system enormously, but I'm not sure how capable those wireless systems would actually be. Range in particular would be an issue between the stomach/intestines and the brain. This might be solvable with some kind of relay network across that distance.






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              Ajacmac is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                up vote
                0
                down vote













                I think there might be a way.



                As other answers have mentioned, emotional responses are pretty complicated things.



                Some emotions are more readily induced or modulated than others, and the more complex the emotion the more complex the means of effecting it needs to be.



                Some real-world foods can make you happier some of the time simply because they're high in carbs. High-carb foods reduce stress hormone release in the brain.



                As has been mentioned already, getting very precise at this point seems to require access to the inside of the brain itself and being able to distinguish between and selectively modify specific regions in specific ways.



                The solution depends on how techy you want your story to be. If you're both going for a super high tech/robotic setting and want accuracy, you could use nanobots that migrate to specific regions of the brain on their own over time, then receive signals of some form or other in order to provide the necessary response.



                ie:



                acquire nanobots



                nanobots migrate to their specified locations



                nanobots recieve signal



                appropriate nanobots release/trigger release of appropriate neurotransmitters



                This signal could come in various forms and could even be food if you figured out how to send specific messages to the various nanobots based on food consumed.



                Maybe you could just find some set of neutral compounds that don't exist in food/other ingestables and have a different set of nanobots in the digestive tract that detect the presence of those and their relative proportions, interpret those proportions as a specific emotional response, then send the correct message to the nanobots in the brain.



                Some kind of wireless mesh network between the nanobots might be able to simplify this whole system enormously, but I'm not sure how capable those wireless systems would actually be. Range in particular would be an issue between the stomach/intestines and the brain. This might be solvable with some kind of relay network across that distance.






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                Ajacmac is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.




















                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote









                  I think there might be a way.



                  As other answers have mentioned, emotional responses are pretty complicated things.



                  Some emotions are more readily induced or modulated than others, and the more complex the emotion the more complex the means of effecting it needs to be.



                  Some real-world foods can make you happier some of the time simply because they're high in carbs. High-carb foods reduce stress hormone release in the brain.



                  As has been mentioned already, getting very precise at this point seems to require access to the inside of the brain itself and being able to distinguish between and selectively modify specific regions in specific ways.



                  The solution depends on how techy you want your story to be. If you're both going for a super high tech/robotic setting and want accuracy, you could use nanobots that migrate to specific regions of the brain on their own over time, then receive signals of some form or other in order to provide the necessary response.



                  ie:



                  acquire nanobots



                  nanobots migrate to their specified locations



                  nanobots recieve signal



                  appropriate nanobots release/trigger release of appropriate neurotransmitters



                  This signal could come in various forms and could even be food if you figured out how to send specific messages to the various nanobots based on food consumed.



                  Maybe you could just find some set of neutral compounds that don't exist in food/other ingestables and have a different set of nanobots in the digestive tract that detect the presence of those and their relative proportions, interpret those proportions as a specific emotional response, then send the correct message to the nanobots in the brain.



                  Some kind of wireless mesh network between the nanobots might be able to simplify this whole system enormously, but I'm not sure how capable those wireless systems would actually be. Range in particular would be an issue between the stomach/intestines and the brain. This might be solvable with some kind of relay network across that distance.






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  Ajacmac is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  I think there might be a way.



                  As other answers have mentioned, emotional responses are pretty complicated things.



                  Some emotions are more readily induced or modulated than others, and the more complex the emotion the more complex the means of effecting it needs to be.



                  Some real-world foods can make you happier some of the time simply because they're high in carbs. High-carb foods reduce stress hormone release in the brain.



                  As has been mentioned already, getting very precise at this point seems to require access to the inside of the brain itself and being able to distinguish between and selectively modify specific regions in specific ways.



                  The solution depends on how techy you want your story to be. If you're both going for a super high tech/robotic setting and want accuracy, you could use nanobots that migrate to specific regions of the brain on their own over time, then receive signals of some form or other in order to provide the necessary response.



                  ie:



                  acquire nanobots



                  nanobots migrate to their specified locations



                  nanobots recieve signal



                  appropriate nanobots release/trigger release of appropriate neurotransmitters



                  This signal could come in various forms and could even be food if you figured out how to send specific messages to the various nanobots based on food consumed.



                  Maybe you could just find some set of neutral compounds that don't exist in food/other ingestables and have a different set of nanobots in the digestive tract that detect the presence of those and their relative proportions, interpret those proportions as a specific emotional response, then send the correct message to the nanobots in the brain.



                  Some kind of wireless mesh network between the nanobots might be able to simplify this whole system enormously, but I'm not sure how capable those wireless systems would actually be. Range in particular would be an issue between the stomach/intestines and the brain. This might be solvable with some kind of relay network across that distance.







                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  Ajacmac is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer






                  New contributor




                  Ajacmac is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered 6 hours ago









                  Ajacmac

                  11




                  11




                  New contributor




                  Ajacmac is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  Ajacmac is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  Ajacmac is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                      Sofie is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded


















                      Sofie is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                      Sofie is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Sofie is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.















                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f131021%2fwould-it-be-possible-to-distil-specific-human-emotions-into-an-edible-drug-form%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Create new schema in PostgreSQL using DBeaver

                      Deepest pit of an array with Javascript: test on Codility

                      Costa Masnaga