How to make a dynamic storage of objects (c++)

I am a beginner to programming and I am trying to find a way to create a dynamic storage of objects of my pigeon class. Here is my code:

class pigeon {

public:

    pigeon(std::string nameI);

    void outputInfo();

private:

    std::string name;

};

The idea is that I want to be able to add a new object, have a place to store its information, then be able to add another object, and so on. I have no idea where to start with this or even what data structure to use, I have no experience storing objects.

asked Nov 21 '18 at 22:13

NipIsTrue

176

4

Are the objects you want to store of the same type? If so you can simply use a std::vector<YourObject>

– Zpalmtree
Nov 21 '18 at 22:14

4

std::vector

– François Andrieux
Nov 21 '18 at 22:15

You need to indicate in your question what you mean by store. Do you mean in memory or something more permanent?

– Kit
Nov 21 '18 at 22:17

As @FrançoisAndrieux already said. Use a std::vector.

– Jesper Juhl
Nov 21 '18 at 22:37

add a comment |

I am a beginner to programming and I am trying to find a way to create a dynamic storage of objects of my pigeon class. Here is my code:

class pigeon {

public:

    pigeon(std::string nameI);

    void outputInfo();

private:

    std::string name;

};

asked Nov 21 '18 at 22:13

NipIsTrue

176

4

Are the objects you want to store of the same type? If so you can simply use a std::vector<YourObject>

– Zpalmtree
Nov 21 '18 at 22:14

4

std::vector

– François Andrieux
Nov 21 '18 at 22:15

You need to indicate in your question what you mean by store. Do you mean in memory or something more permanent?

– Kit
Nov 21 '18 at 22:17

As @FrançoisAndrieux already said. Use a std::vector.

– Jesper Juhl
Nov 21 '18 at 22:37

add a comment |

I am a beginner to programming and I am trying to find a way to create a dynamic storage of objects of my pigeon class. Here is my code:

class pigeon {

public:

    pigeon(std::string nameI);

    void outputInfo();

private:

    std::string name;

};

asked Nov 21 '18 at 22:13

NipIsTrue

176

I am a beginner to programming and I am trying to find a way to create a dynamic storage of objects of my pigeon class. Here is my code:

class pigeon {

public:

    pigeon(std::string nameI);

    void outputInfo();

private:

    std::string name;

};

c++ data-structures

asked Nov 21 '18 at 22:13

NipIsTrue

176

asked Nov 21 '18 at 22:13

NipIsTrue

176

asked Nov 21 '18 at 22:13

NipIsTrue

176

asked Nov 21 '18 at 22:13

NipIsTrue

176

asked Nov 21 '18 at 22:13

NipIsTrue

176

4

Are the objects you want to store of the same type? If so you can simply use a std::vector<YourObject>

– Zpalmtree
Nov 21 '18 at 22:14

4

std::vector

– François Andrieux
Nov 21 '18 at 22:15

You need to indicate in your question what you mean by store. Do you mean in memory or something more permanent?

– Kit
Nov 21 '18 at 22:17

As @FrançoisAndrieux already said. Use a std::vector.

– Jesper Juhl
Nov 21 '18 at 22:37

add a comment |

4

Are the objects you want to store of the same type? If so you can simply use a std::vector<YourObject>

– Zpalmtree
Nov 21 '18 at 22:14

4

std::vector

– François Andrieux
Nov 21 '18 at 22:15

You need to indicate in your question what you mean by store. Do you mean in memory or something more permanent?

– Kit
Nov 21 '18 at 22:17

As @FrançoisAndrieux already said. Use a std::vector.

– Jesper Juhl
Nov 21 '18 at 22:37

Are the objects you want to store of the same type? If so you can simply use a std::vector<YourObject>

– Zpalmtree
Nov 21 '18 at 22:14

std::vector

– François Andrieux
Nov 21 '18 at 22:15

You need to indicate in your question what you mean by store. Do you mean in memory or something more permanent?

– Kit
Nov 21 '18 at 22:17

As @FrançoisAndrieux already said. Use a std::vector.

– Jesper Juhl
Nov 21 '18 at 22:37

add a comment |

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

Make vector with pointer of your class:

std::vector<pigeon*> pigeons;

Then allocate new pigeon object and push it into your vector:

pigeon * pig = new pigeon("pigeon");

pigeons.push_back(pig);

answered Nov 21 '18 at 22:52

kara

576

1

Is there a reason you suggest using raw owning pointers and adding another level of indirection where std::vector<pigeon> already does what the OP wants?

– Swordfish
Nov 21 '18 at 23:28

Op wants to store dynamic objects. When you use vector<pigeon> it first copies the object and stores it. This is not dynamic storing. And some point of view it is not efficient.

– kara
Nov 21 '18 at 23:39

1

There is always emplace_back() and smart pointers.

– Swordfish
Nov 21 '18 at 23:42

Can you give an example of usage of these?

– kara
Nov 21 '18 at 23:46

2

If copying objects is very expensive, don't copy. There are better ways like having a collection of indexes around that you reorder instead of the objects in the vector. Maybe use a std::list<std::unique_ptr<pigeon>>.

– Swordfish
Nov 22 '18 at 0:30

|
show 4 more comments

As it was already pointed out in the comments, you should preferably use a container that handles its resources following the RAII/RDID-idiom ( "Resource Acquisition Is Initialisation" / "Resource Destruction is Deletion") so you don't have to worry about it yourself. This is also a simple way of preventing resource leaks when an exception is thrown.

One of the commonly used containers of the C++ standard library is std::vector<>.

You'd use it like this (just to give you an initial idea, please refer to the documentation for further explanation and examples):

#include <vector>



// ...



{

    std::vector<pigeon> pigeons;



    pigeons.push_back("Karl");   // add three pigeons

    pigeons.push_back("Franz");  // at the end of the

    pigeons.push_back("Xaver");  // vector



    pigeons[1]; // access "Franz"



    for(auto /* maybe const */ &p : pigeons) {  // iterate over the vector

        // do something with pigeon p

    }



} // pigeons goes out of scope, its destructor is called which

  // takes care of deallocating the memory used by the vector.

edited Nov 21 '18 at 23:51

answered Nov 21 '18 at 23:39

Swordfish

9,22211335

add a comment |

Your Answer

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});

}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53421184%2fhow-to-make-a-dynamic-storage-of-objects-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

Make vector with pointer of your class:

std::vector<pigeon*> pigeons;

Then allocate new pigeon object and push it into your vector:

pigeon * pig = new pigeon("pigeon");

pigeons.push_back(pig);

answered Nov 21 '18 at 22:52

kara

576

1

Is there a reason you suggest using raw owning pointers and adding another level of indirection where std::vector<pigeon> already does what the OP wants?

– Swordfish
Nov 21 '18 at 23:28

Op wants to store dynamic objects. When you use vector<pigeon> it first copies the object and stores it. This is not dynamic storing. And some point of view it is not efficient.

– kara
Nov 21 '18 at 23:39

1

There is always emplace_back() and smart pointers.

– Swordfish
Nov 21 '18 at 23:42

Can you give an example of usage of these?

– kara
Nov 21 '18 at 23:46

2

If copying objects is very expensive, don't copy. There are better ways like having a collection of indexes around that you reorder instead of the objects in the vector. Maybe use a std::list<std::unique_ptr<pigeon>>.

– Swordfish
Nov 22 '18 at 0:30

|
show 4 more comments

Make vector with pointer of your class:

std::vector<pigeon*> pigeons;

Then allocate new pigeon object and push it into your vector:

pigeon * pig = new pigeon("pigeon");

pigeons.push_back(pig);

answered Nov 21 '18 at 22:52

kara

576

1

Is there a reason you suggest using raw owning pointers and adding another level of indirection where std::vector<pigeon> already does what the OP wants?

– Swordfish
Nov 21 '18 at 23:28

Op wants to store dynamic objects. When you use vector<pigeon> it first copies the object and stores it. This is not dynamic storing. And some point of view it is not efficient.

– kara
Nov 21 '18 at 23:39

1

There is always emplace_back() and smart pointers.

– Swordfish
Nov 21 '18 at 23:42

Can you give an example of usage of these?

– kara
Nov 21 '18 at 23:46

2

If copying objects is very expensive, don't copy. There are better ways like having a collection of indexes around that you reorder instead of the objects in the vector. Maybe use a std::list<std::unique_ptr<pigeon>>.

– Swordfish
Nov 22 '18 at 0:30

|
show 4 more comments

Make vector with pointer of your class:

std::vector<pigeon*> pigeons;

Then allocate new pigeon object and push it into your vector:

pigeon * pig = new pigeon("pigeon");

pigeons.push_back(pig);

answered Nov 21 '18 at 22:52

kara

576

Make vector with pointer of your class:

std::vector<pigeon*> pigeons;

Then allocate new pigeon object and push it into your vector:

pigeon * pig = new pigeon("pigeon");

pigeons.push_back(pig);

answered Nov 21 '18 at 22:52

kara

576

answered Nov 21 '18 at 22:52

kara

576

answered Nov 21 '18 at 22:52

kara

576

answered Nov 21 '18 at 22:52

kara

576

1

Is there a reason you suggest using raw owning pointers and adding another level of indirection where std::vector<pigeon> already does what the OP wants?

– Swordfish
Nov 21 '18 at 23:28

Op wants to store dynamic objects. When you use vector<pigeon> it first copies the object and stores it. This is not dynamic storing. And some point of view it is not efficient.

– kara
Nov 21 '18 at 23:39

1

There is always emplace_back() and smart pointers.

– Swordfish
Nov 21 '18 at 23:42

Can you give an example of usage of these?

– kara
Nov 21 '18 at 23:46

2

If copying objects is very expensive, don't copy. There are better ways like having a collection of indexes around that you reorder instead of the objects in the vector. Maybe use a std::list<std::unique_ptr<pigeon>>.

– Swordfish
Nov 22 '18 at 0:30

|
show 4 more comments

1

Is there a reason you suggest using raw owning pointers and adding another level of indirection where std::vector<pigeon> already does what the OP wants?

– Swordfish
Nov 21 '18 at 23:28

Op wants to store dynamic objects. When you use vector<pigeon> it first copies the object and stores it. This is not dynamic storing. And some point of view it is not efficient.

– kara
Nov 21 '18 at 23:39

1

There is always emplace_back() and smart pointers.

– Swordfish
Nov 21 '18 at 23:42

Can you give an example of usage of these?

– kara
Nov 21 '18 at 23:46

2

If copying objects is very expensive, don't copy. There are better ways like having a collection of indexes around that you reorder instead of the objects in the vector. Maybe use a std::list<std::unique_ptr<pigeon>>.

– Swordfish
Nov 22 '18 at 0:30

Is there a reason you suggest using raw owning pointers and adding another level of indirection where std::vector<pigeon> already does what the OP wants?

– Swordfish
Nov 21 '18 at 23:28

Op wants to store dynamic objects. When you use vector<pigeon> it first copies the object and stores it. This is not dynamic storing. And some point of view it is not efficient.

– kara
Nov 21 '18 at 23:39

There is always emplace_back() and smart pointers.

– Swordfish
Nov 21 '18 at 23:42

Can you give an example of usage of these?

– kara
Nov 21 '18 at 23:46

If copying objects is very expensive, don't copy. There are better ways like having a collection of indexes around that you reorder instead of the objects in the vector. Maybe use a std::list<std::unique_ptr<pigeon>>.

– Swordfish
Nov 22 '18 at 0:30

|
show 4 more comments

One of the commonly used containers of the C++ standard library is std::vector<>.

You'd use it like this (just to give you an initial idea, please refer to the documentation for further explanation and examples):

#include <vector>



// ...



{

    std::vector<pigeon> pigeons;



    pigeons.push_back("Karl");   // add three pigeons

    pigeons.push_back("Franz");  // at the end of the

    pigeons.push_back("Xaver");  // vector



    pigeons[1]; // access "Franz"



    for(auto /* maybe const */ &p : pigeons) {  // iterate over the vector

        // do something with pigeon p

    }



} // pigeons goes out of scope, its destructor is called which

  // takes care of deallocating the memory used by the vector.

edited Nov 21 '18 at 23:51

answered Nov 21 '18 at 23:39

Swordfish

9,22211335

add a comment |

One of the commonly used containers of the C++ standard library is std::vector<>.

You'd use it like this (just to give you an initial idea, please refer to the documentation for further explanation and examples):

#include <vector>



// ...



{

    std::vector<pigeon> pigeons;



    pigeons.push_back("Karl");   // add three pigeons

    pigeons.push_back("Franz");  // at the end of the

    pigeons.push_back("Xaver");  // vector



    pigeons[1]; // access "Franz"



    for(auto /* maybe const */ &p : pigeons) {  // iterate over the vector

        // do something with pigeon p

    }



} // pigeons goes out of scope, its destructor is called which

  // takes care of deallocating the memory used by the vector.

edited Nov 21 '18 at 23:51

answered Nov 21 '18 at 23:39

Swordfish

9,22211335

add a comment |

One of the commonly used containers of the C++ standard library is std::vector<>.

You'd use it like this (just to give you an initial idea, please refer to the documentation for further explanation and examples):

#include <vector>



// ...



{

    std::vector<pigeon> pigeons;



    pigeons.push_back("Karl");   // add three pigeons

    pigeons.push_back("Franz");  // at the end of the

    pigeons.push_back("Xaver");  // vector



    pigeons[1]; // access "Franz"



    for(auto /* maybe const */ &p : pigeons) {  // iterate over the vector

        // do something with pigeon p

    }



} // pigeons goes out of scope, its destructor is called which

  // takes care of deallocating the memory used by the vector.

edited Nov 21 '18 at 23:51

answered Nov 21 '18 at 23:39

Swordfish

9,22211335

One of the commonly used containers of the C++ standard library is std::vector<>.

You'd use it like this (just to give you an initial idea, please refer to the documentation for further explanation and examples):

#include <vector>



// ...



{

    std::vector<pigeon> pigeons;



    pigeons.push_back("Karl");   // add three pigeons

    pigeons.push_back("Franz");  // at the end of the

    pigeons.push_back("Xaver");  // vector



    pigeons[1]; // access "Franz"



    for(auto /* maybe const */ &p : pigeons) {  // iterate over the vector

        // do something with pigeon p

    }



} // pigeons goes out of scope, its destructor is called which

  // takes care of deallocating the memory used by the vector.

edited Nov 21 '18 at 23:51

answered Nov 21 '18 at 23:39

Swordfish

9,22211335

edited Nov 21 '18 at 23:51

answered Nov 21 '18 at 23:39

Swordfish

9,22211335

answered Nov 21 '18 at 23:39

Swordfish

9,22211335

answered Nov 21 '18 at 23:39

Swordfish

9,22211335

add a comment |

draft saved

draft discarded

Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!

Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …

Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Name

Required, but never shown

Name

Required, but never shown

This page is only for reference, If you need detailed information, please check here

搜尋此網誌

Nsryjdtyk