Different 100% height of table in Chrome/IE and FireFox
The problem is, that all of elements (main container, table container and table itself) must have 100% height. Table itself has slightly smaller size in Chrome and IE, than in Firefox, which causes a small gap between .table-container and table borders.
Do somebody know how to fix this? I've spent almost all day for this, and can't simply find a solution. Would be grateful for any help.
Here is a link for fiddle with my current problem: fiddle link
<div class="container">
<div class="buttons">
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
</div>
<div class="table-container">
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>4</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>a</td>
<td>b</td>
<td>c</td>
<td>d</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>aa</td>
<td>bb</td>
<td>cc</td>
<td>dd</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>aaa</td>
<td>bbb</td>
<td>ccc</td>
<td>ddd</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
and CSS:
html, body, .container, .table-container, table
{
height: 100%;
}
.container
{
display: block;
width: 500px;
margin: 0 auto;
text-align: center;
}
.table-container
{
width: 100%;
border: 1px solid red;
padding-top: 30px;
margin-top: -30px;
}
.buttons
{
height: 30px;
}
.buttons div
{
box-sizing: border-box;
-moz-box-sizing: border-box;
width: 25%;
float: left;
height: 30px;
border: 1px solid black;
}
table
{
border: 1px solid black;
width: 100%;
border-spacing: 0;
}
thead td, tbody td
{
width: 25%;
height: 25%;
}
Update: added padding and negative margin for .table-container
Update2: added border-spacing and border-collapse to an example. Still not working properly.
Update3: Now it works here, which means, that i couldn't fully reproduce my bug to show it to you :( But in general, the problem is, that the height of 5x5 table in Chrome is less from FF on 22px, which is 22px gap between table container and a table itself. Each cell has around 4px + to table height in Firefox.
html css html-table
add a comment |
The problem is, that all of elements (main container, table container and table itself) must have 100% height. Table itself has slightly smaller size in Chrome and IE, than in Firefox, which causes a small gap between .table-container and table borders.
Do somebody know how to fix this? I've spent almost all day for this, and can't simply find a solution. Would be grateful for any help.
Here is a link for fiddle with my current problem: fiddle link
<div class="container">
<div class="buttons">
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
</div>
<div class="table-container">
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>4</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>a</td>
<td>b</td>
<td>c</td>
<td>d</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>aa</td>
<td>bb</td>
<td>cc</td>
<td>dd</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>aaa</td>
<td>bbb</td>
<td>ccc</td>
<td>ddd</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
and CSS:
html, body, .container, .table-container, table
{
height: 100%;
}
.container
{
display: block;
width: 500px;
margin: 0 auto;
text-align: center;
}
.table-container
{
width: 100%;
border: 1px solid red;
padding-top: 30px;
margin-top: -30px;
}
.buttons
{
height: 30px;
}
.buttons div
{
box-sizing: border-box;
-moz-box-sizing: border-box;
width: 25%;
float: left;
height: 30px;
border: 1px solid black;
}
table
{
border: 1px solid black;
width: 100%;
border-spacing: 0;
}
thead td, tbody td
{
width: 25%;
height: 25%;
}
Update: added padding and negative margin for .table-container
Update2: added border-spacing and border-collapse to an example. Still not working properly.
Update3: Now it works here, which means, that i couldn't fully reproduce my bug to show it to you :( But in general, the problem is, that the height of 5x5 table in Chrome is less from FF on 22px, which is 22px gap between table container and a table itself. Each cell has around 4px + to table height in Firefox.
html css html-table
add a comment |
The problem is, that all of elements (main container, table container and table itself) must have 100% height. Table itself has slightly smaller size in Chrome and IE, than in Firefox, which causes a small gap between .table-container and table borders.
Do somebody know how to fix this? I've spent almost all day for this, and can't simply find a solution. Would be grateful for any help.
Here is a link for fiddle with my current problem: fiddle link
<div class="container">
<div class="buttons">
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
</div>
<div class="table-container">
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>4</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>a</td>
<td>b</td>
<td>c</td>
<td>d</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>aa</td>
<td>bb</td>
<td>cc</td>
<td>dd</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>aaa</td>
<td>bbb</td>
<td>ccc</td>
<td>ddd</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
and CSS:
html, body, .container, .table-container, table
{
height: 100%;
}
.container
{
display: block;
width: 500px;
margin: 0 auto;
text-align: center;
}
.table-container
{
width: 100%;
border: 1px solid red;
padding-top: 30px;
margin-top: -30px;
}
.buttons
{
height: 30px;
}
.buttons div
{
box-sizing: border-box;
-moz-box-sizing: border-box;
width: 25%;
float: left;
height: 30px;
border: 1px solid black;
}
table
{
border: 1px solid black;
width: 100%;
border-spacing: 0;
}
thead td, tbody td
{
width: 25%;
height: 25%;
}
Update: added padding and negative margin for .table-container
Update2: added border-spacing and border-collapse to an example. Still not working properly.
Update3: Now it works here, which means, that i couldn't fully reproduce my bug to show it to you :( But in general, the problem is, that the height of 5x5 table in Chrome is less from FF on 22px, which is 22px gap between table container and a table itself. Each cell has around 4px + to table height in Firefox.
html css html-table
The problem is, that all of elements (main container, table container and table itself) must have 100% height. Table itself has slightly smaller size in Chrome and IE, than in Firefox, which causes a small gap between .table-container and table borders.
Do somebody know how to fix this? I've spent almost all day for this, and can't simply find a solution. Would be grateful for any help.
Here is a link for fiddle with my current problem: fiddle link
<div class="container">
<div class="buttons">
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
</div>
<div class="table-container">
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>4</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>a</td>
<td>b</td>
<td>c</td>
<td>d</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>aa</td>
<td>bb</td>
<td>cc</td>
<td>dd</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>aaa</td>
<td>bbb</td>
<td>ccc</td>
<td>ddd</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
and CSS:
html, body, .container, .table-container, table
{
height: 100%;
}
.container
{
display: block;
width: 500px;
margin: 0 auto;
text-align: center;
}
.table-container
{
width: 100%;
border: 1px solid red;
padding-top: 30px;
margin-top: -30px;
}
.buttons
{
height: 30px;
}
.buttons div
{
box-sizing: border-box;
-moz-box-sizing: border-box;
width: 25%;
float: left;
height: 30px;
border: 1px solid black;
}
table
{
border: 1px solid black;
width: 100%;
border-spacing: 0;
}
thead td, tbody td
{
width: 25%;
height: 25%;
}
Update: added padding and negative margin for .table-container
Update2: added border-spacing and border-collapse to an example. Still not working properly.
Update3: Now it works here, which means, that i couldn't fully reproduce my bug to show it to you :( But in general, the problem is, that the height of 5x5 table in Chrome is less from FF on 22px, which is 22px gap between table container and a table itself. Each cell has around 4px + to table height in Firefox.
html css html-table
html css html-table
edited Nov 23 '18 at 11:57
Brian Tompsett - 汤莱恩
4,2231338101
4,2231338101
asked Apr 23 '13 at 12:18
KamiliusKamilius
3691027
3691027
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
It appears to be the border spacing on the table.
Apply this CSS to the table element:
border-spacing: 0;
Nope, added those two into fiddle and code here. Didn't helped
– Kamilius
Apr 23 '13 at 12:42
3
Border-spacing is not valid when the border-collapse is set to 'collapse' it is only used when border-collapse is set to separate!
– Zeddy
Apr 23 '13 at 12:43
@Zaf Khan +1 Good point, I didn't even notice it was set to collapse...
– MasNotsram
Apr 23 '13 at 12:47
So for THIS example, you're right, SpAm. But trouble still persists and i think that i'm forced to figure it out by myself :) Thanks btw.
– Kamilius
Apr 23 '13 at 12:54
add a comment |
Be aware that
width: 100%;
does not work the exactly the same way as
height: 100%;
does.
While width: 100% grabs 100% of the parent's width even if there has not been an explicit setting of that width, height: 100% works only on elements whose parents have a fixed height.
Simply speaking, %-width applies dynamically, while %-height applies to static parents container's heights.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f16169171%2fdifferent-100-height-of-table-in-chrome-ie-and-firefox%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It appears to be the border spacing on the table.
Apply this CSS to the table element:
border-spacing: 0;
Nope, added those two into fiddle and code here. Didn't helped
– Kamilius
Apr 23 '13 at 12:42
3
Border-spacing is not valid when the border-collapse is set to 'collapse' it is only used when border-collapse is set to separate!
– Zeddy
Apr 23 '13 at 12:43
@Zaf Khan +1 Good point, I didn't even notice it was set to collapse...
– MasNotsram
Apr 23 '13 at 12:47
So for THIS example, you're right, SpAm. But trouble still persists and i think that i'm forced to figure it out by myself :) Thanks btw.
– Kamilius
Apr 23 '13 at 12:54
add a comment |
It appears to be the border spacing on the table.
Apply this CSS to the table element:
border-spacing: 0;
Nope, added those two into fiddle and code here. Didn't helped
– Kamilius
Apr 23 '13 at 12:42
3
Border-spacing is not valid when the border-collapse is set to 'collapse' it is only used when border-collapse is set to separate!
– Zeddy
Apr 23 '13 at 12:43
@Zaf Khan +1 Good point, I didn't even notice it was set to collapse...
– MasNotsram
Apr 23 '13 at 12:47
So for THIS example, you're right, SpAm. But trouble still persists and i think that i'm forced to figure it out by myself :) Thanks btw.
– Kamilius
Apr 23 '13 at 12:54
add a comment |
It appears to be the border spacing on the table.
Apply this CSS to the table element:
border-spacing: 0;
It appears to be the border spacing on the table.
Apply this CSS to the table element:
border-spacing: 0;
answered Apr 23 '13 at 12:34
MasNotsramMasNotsram
1,9151123
1,9151123
Nope, added those two into fiddle and code here. Didn't helped
– Kamilius
Apr 23 '13 at 12:42
3
Border-spacing is not valid when the border-collapse is set to 'collapse' it is only used when border-collapse is set to separate!
– Zeddy
Apr 23 '13 at 12:43
@Zaf Khan +1 Good point, I didn't even notice it was set to collapse...
– MasNotsram
Apr 23 '13 at 12:47
So for THIS example, you're right, SpAm. But trouble still persists and i think that i'm forced to figure it out by myself :) Thanks btw.
– Kamilius
Apr 23 '13 at 12:54
add a comment |
Nope, added those two into fiddle and code here. Didn't helped
– Kamilius
Apr 23 '13 at 12:42
3
Border-spacing is not valid when the border-collapse is set to 'collapse' it is only used when border-collapse is set to separate!
– Zeddy
Apr 23 '13 at 12:43
@Zaf Khan +1 Good point, I didn't even notice it was set to collapse...
– MasNotsram
Apr 23 '13 at 12:47
So for THIS example, you're right, SpAm. But trouble still persists and i think that i'm forced to figure it out by myself :) Thanks btw.
– Kamilius
Apr 23 '13 at 12:54
Nope, added those two into fiddle and code here. Didn't helped
– Kamilius
Apr 23 '13 at 12:42
Nope, added those two into fiddle and code here. Didn't helped
– Kamilius
Apr 23 '13 at 12:42
3
3
Border-spacing is not valid when the border-collapse is set to 'collapse' it is only used when border-collapse is set to separate!
– Zeddy
Apr 23 '13 at 12:43
Border-spacing is not valid when the border-collapse is set to 'collapse' it is only used when border-collapse is set to separate!
– Zeddy
Apr 23 '13 at 12:43
@Zaf Khan +1 Good point, I didn't even notice it was set to collapse...
– MasNotsram
Apr 23 '13 at 12:47
@Zaf Khan +1 Good point, I didn't even notice it was set to collapse...
– MasNotsram
Apr 23 '13 at 12:47
So for THIS example, you're right, SpAm. But trouble still persists and i think that i'm forced to figure it out by myself :) Thanks btw.
– Kamilius
Apr 23 '13 at 12:54
So for THIS example, you're right, SpAm. But trouble still persists and i think that i'm forced to figure it out by myself :) Thanks btw.
– Kamilius
Apr 23 '13 at 12:54
add a comment |
Be aware that
width: 100%;
does not work the exactly the same way as
height: 100%;
does.
While width: 100% grabs 100% of the parent's width even if there has not been an explicit setting of that width, height: 100% works only on elements whose parents have a fixed height.
Simply speaking, %-width applies dynamically, while %-height applies to static parents container's heights.
add a comment |
Be aware that
width: 100%;
does not work the exactly the same way as
height: 100%;
does.
While width: 100% grabs 100% of the parent's width even if there has not been an explicit setting of that width, height: 100% works only on elements whose parents have a fixed height.
Simply speaking, %-width applies dynamically, while %-height applies to static parents container's heights.
add a comment |
Be aware that
width: 100%;
does not work the exactly the same way as
height: 100%;
does.
While width: 100% grabs 100% of the parent's width even if there has not been an explicit setting of that width, height: 100% works only on elements whose parents have a fixed height.
Simply speaking, %-width applies dynamically, while %-height applies to static parents container's heights.
Be aware that
width: 100%;
does not work the exactly the same way as
height: 100%;
does.
While width: 100% grabs 100% of the parent's width even if there has not been an explicit setting of that width, height: 100% works only on elements whose parents have a fixed height.
Simply speaking, %-width applies dynamically, while %-height applies to static parents container's heights.
answered Jun 16 '14 at 19:22
connexoconnexo
21.9k83557
21.9k83557
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f16169171%2fdifferent-100-height-of-table-in-chrome-ie-and-firefox%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown