Nsryjdtyk

In the following Keras and Tensorflow implementations of the training of a neural network, how model.train_on_batch([x], [y]) in the keras implementation is different than sess.run([train_optimizer, cross_entropy, accuracy_op], feed_dict=feed_dict) in the Tensorflow implementation? In particular: how those two lines can lead to different computation in training?:

keras_version.py

input_x = Input(shape=input_shape, name="x")

c = Dense(num_classes, activation="softmax")(input_x)



model = Model([input_x], [c])

opt = Adam(lr)

model.compile(loss=['categorical_crossentropy'], optimizer=opt)



nb_batchs = int(len(x_train)/batch_size)



for epoch in range(epochs):

    loss = 0.0

    for batch in range(nb_batchs):

        x = x_train[batch*batch_size:(batch+1)*batch_size]

        y = y_train[batch*batch_size:(batch+1)*batch_size]



        loss_batch, acc_batch = model.train_on_batch([x], [y])



        loss += loss_batch

    print(epoch, loss / nb_batchs)

tensorflow_version.py

input_x = Input(shape=input_shape, name="x")

c = Dense(num_classes)(input_x)



input_y = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, shape=[None, num_classes], name="label")

cross_entropy = tf.reduce_mean(

    tf.nn.softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits_v2(labels=input_y, logits=c, name="xentropy"),

    name="xentropy_mean"

)

train_optimizer = tf.train.AdamOptimizer(learning_rate=lr).minimize(cross_entropy)



nb_batchs = int(len(x_train)/batch_size)



init = tf.global_variables_initializer()

with tf.Session() as sess:

    sess.run(init)

    for epoch in range(epochs):

        loss = 0.0

        acc = 0.0



        for batch in range(nb_batchs):

            x = x_train[batch*batch_size:(batch+1)*batch_size]

            y = y_train[batch*batch_size:(batch+1)*batch_size]



            feed_dict = {input_x: x,

                         input_y: y}

            _, loss_batch = sess.run([train_optimizer, cross_entropy], feed_dict=feed_dict)



            loss += loss_batch

        print(epoch, loss / nb_batchs)

Note: This question follows Same (?) model converges in Keras but not in Tensorflow , which have been considered too broad but in which I show exactly why I think those two statements are somehow different and lead to different computation.

Yes, the results can be different. The results shouldn't be surprising if you know the following things in advance:

1. Implementation of corss-entropy in Tensorflow and Keras is different. Tensorflow assumes the input to tf.nn.softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits_v2 as the raw unnormalized logits while Keras accepts inputs as probabilities


2. Implementation of optimizers in Keras and Tensorflow are different.


3. It might be the case that you are shuffling the data and the batches passed aren't in the same order. Although it doesn't matter if you run the model for long but initial few epochs can be entirely different. Make sure same batch is passed to both and then compare the results.