Does multi-classing into Fighter give you heavy armor proficiency?












6












$begingroup$


A lot of build guides I've seen suggest you should dip into Fighter in order to get heavy armor proficiency. But that doesn't seem right since the multi-class rules in the PHB (p164) does not list heavy armor as a proficiency you get.



Have I misunderstood something? Is there a way to get heavy armor by multi-classing into fighter?










share|improve this question









New contributor




M.T. Black is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour, and check out the help center for more guidance.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    2 hours ago
















6












$begingroup$


A lot of build guides I've seen suggest you should dip into Fighter in order to get heavy armor proficiency. But that doesn't seem right since the multi-class rules in the PHB (p164) does not list heavy armor as a proficiency you get.



Have I misunderstood something? Is there a way to get heavy armor by multi-classing into fighter?










share|improve this question









New contributor




M.T. Black is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour, and check out the help center for more guidance.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    2 hours ago














6












6








6





$begingroup$


A lot of build guides I've seen suggest you should dip into Fighter in order to get heavy armor proficiency. But that doesn't seem right since the multi-class rules in the PHB (p164) does not list heavy armor as a proficiency you get.



Have I misunderstood something? Is there a way to get heavy armor by multi-classing into fighter?










share|improve this question









New contributor




M.T. Black is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




A lot of build guides I've seen suggest you should dip into Fighter in order to get heavy armor proficiency. But that doesn't seem right since the multi-class rules in the PHB (p164) does not list heavy armor as a proficiency you get.



Have I misunderstood something? Is there a way to get heavy armor by multi-classing into fighter?







dnd-5e multi-classing fighter armor proficiency






share|improve this question









New contributor




M.T. Black is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




M.T. Black is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 hours ago









V2Blast

24.7k383155




24.7k383155






New contributor




M.T. Black is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 3 hours ago









M.T. BlackM.T. Black

312




312




New contributor




M.T. Black is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





M.T. Black is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






M.T. Black is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour, and check out the help center for more guidance.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    2 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour, and check out the help center for more guidance.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    2 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour, and check out the help center for more guidance.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour, and check out the help center for more guidance.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
2 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

What you've missed is that if you take a Fighter level first, it gives you heavy armour. Likewise, one of the main reasons people recommend Fighter dips is that if you take it at first level, you get the enormously useful Constitution saving throw proficiency. So when a guide recommends a Fighter dip, it's generally recommending starting with a level of Fighter, then taking further levels in what you actually want to do.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    That's a helpful distinction. Is it still called "dipping" if I take the minor class first?
    $endgroup$
    – M.T. Black
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @M.T.Black: It can be, I suppose, as long as it's not your "main class" - the one you intend to take the most levels in.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @MTBlack Yes, especially if you don't start at level 1, so you never actually play as a pure Fighter.
    $endgroup$
    – Miniman
    2 hours ago



















4












$begingroup$

You are not missing something. Multiclassing into fighter only gives light and medium armor proficiency (as well as shields and simple and martial weapons). You would have to also take the Heavily Armored feat to get heavy armor proficiency.



Somewhat oddly, while multiclassing into cleric only gives light and medium armor plus shields, it also gives you full access to the cleric domains, several of which give heavy armor proficiency. It doesn't seem quite fair that fighters don't get that, but there it is.



Perhaps fighter was considered too attractive of a "dip" with fighting style and second wind also at first level and very attractive additional features at second and third. But that's just speculation. Whatever the reason, if you want heavy armor proficiency from fighter (or paladin), you need to take that as your first-level class.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Excellent, thankyou. I don't have the rep to uptick yet or I would
    $endgroup$
    – M.T. Black
    3 hours ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






M.T. Black is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143308%2fdoes-multi-classing-into-fighter-give-you-heavy-armor-proficiency%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









7












$begingroup$

What you've missed is that if you take a Fighter level first, it gives you heavy armour. Likewise, one of the main reasons people recommend Fighter dips is that if you take it at first level, you get the enormously useful Constitution saving throw proficiency. So when a guide recommends a Fighter dip, it's generally recommending starting with a level of Fighter, then taking further levels in what you actually want to do.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    That's a helpful distinction. Is it still called "dipping" if I take the minor class first?
    $endgroup$
    – M.T. Black
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @M.T.Black: It can be, I suppose, as long as it's not your "main class" - the one you intend to take the most levels in.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @MTBlack Yes, especially if you don't start at level 1, so you never actually play as a pure Fighter.
    $endgroup$
    – Miniman
    2 hours ago
















7












$begingroup$

What you've missed is that if you take a Fighter level first, it gives you heavy armour. Likewise, one of the main reasons people recommend Fighter dips is that if you take it at first level, you get the enormously useful Constitution saving throw proficiency. So when a guide recommends a Fighter dip, it's generally recommending starting with a level of Fighter, then taking further levels in what you actually want to do.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    That's a helpful distinction. Is it still called "dipping" if I take the minor class first?
    $endgroup$
    – M.T. Black
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @M.T.Black: It can be, I suppose, as long as it's not your "main class" - the one you intend to take the most levels in.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @MTBlack Yes, especially if you don't start at level 1, so you never actually play as a pure Fighter.
    $endgroup$
    – Miniman
    2 hours ago














7












7








7





$begingroup$

What you've missed is that if you take a Fighter level first, it gives you heavy armour. Likewise, one of the main reasons people recommend Fighter dips is that if you take it at first level, you get the enormously useful Constitution saving throw proficiency. So when a guide recommends a Fighter dip, it's generally recommending starting with a level of Fighter, then taking further levels in what you actually want to do.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



What you've missed is that if you take a Fighter level first, it gives you heavy armour. Likewise, one of the main reasons people recommend Fighter dips is that if you take it at first level, you get the enormously useful Constitution saving throw proficiency. So when a guide recommends a Fighter dip, it's generally recommending starting with a level of Fighter, then taking further levels in what you actually want to do.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 3 hours ago









MinimanMiniman

114k28515709




114k28515709












  • $begingroup$
    That's a helpful distinction. Is it still called "dipping" if I take the minor class first?
    $endgroup$
    – M.T. Black
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @M.T.Black: It can be, I suppose, as long as it's not your "main class" - the one you intend to take the most levels in.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @MTBlack Yes, especially if you don't start at level 1, so you never actually play as a pure Fighter.
    $endgroup$
    – Miniman
    2 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    That's a helpful distinction. Is it still called "dipping" if I take the minor class first?
    $endgroup$
    – M.T. Black
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @M.T.Black: It can be, I suppose, as long as it's not your "main class" - the one you intend to take the most levels in.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @MTBlack Yes, especially if you don't start at level 1, so you never actually play as a pure Fighter.
    $endgroup$
    – Miniman
    2 hours ago
















$begingroup$
That's a helpful distinction. Is it still called "dipping" if I take the minor class first?
$endgroup$
– M.T. Black
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
That's a helpful distinction. Is it still called "dipping" if I take the minor class first?
$endgroup$
– M.T. Black
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
@M.T.Black: It can be, I suppose, as long as it's not your "main class" - the one you intend to take the most levels in.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
@M.T.Black: It can be, I suppose, as long as it's not your "main class" - the one you intend to take the most levels in.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
@MTBlack Yes, especially if you don't start at level 1, so you never actually play as a pure Fighter.
$endgroup$
– Miniman
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
@MTBlack Yes, especially if you don't start at level 1, so you never actually play as a pure Fighter.
$endgroup$
– Miniman
2 hours ago













4












$begingroup$

You are not missing something. Multiclassing into fighter only gives light and medium armor proficiency (as well as shields and simple and martial weapons). You would have to also take the Heavily Armored feat to get heavy armor proficiency.



Somewhat oddly, while multiclassing into cleric only gives light and medium armor plus shields, it also gives you full access to the cleric domains, several of which give heavy armor proficiency. It doesn't seem quite fair that fighters don't get that, but there it is.



Perhaps fighter was considered too attractive of a "dip" with fighting style and second wind also at first level and very attractive additional features at second and third. But that's just speculation. Whatever the reason, if you want heavy armor proficiency from fighter (or paladin), you need to take that as your first-level class.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Excellent, thankyou. I don't have the rep to uptick yet or I would
    $endgroup$
    – M.T. Black
    3 hours ago
















4












$begingroup$

You are not missing something. Multiclassing into fighter only gives light and medium armor proficiency (as well as shields and simple and martial weapons). You would have to also take the Heavily Armored feat to get heavy armor proficiency.



Somewhat oddly, while multiclassing into cleric only gives light and medium armor plus shields, it also gives you full access to the cleric domains, several of which give heavy armor proficiency. It doesn't seem quite fair that fighters don't get that, but there it is.



Perhaps fighter was considered too attractive of a "dip" with fighting style and second wind also at first level and very attractive additional features at second and third. But that's just speculation. Whatever the reason, if you want heavy armor proficiency from fighter (or paladin), you need to take that as your first-level class.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Excellent, thankyou. I don't have the rep to uptick yet or I would
    $endgroup$
    – M.T. Black
    3 hours ago














4












4








4





$begingroup$

You are not missing something. Multiclassing into fighter only gives light and medium armor proficiency (as well as shields and simple and martial weapons). You would have to also take the Heavily Armored feat to get heavy armor proficiency.



Somewhat oddly, while multiclassing into cleric only gives light and medium armor plus shields, it also gives you full access to the cleric domains, several of which give heavy armor proficiency. It doesn't seem quite fair that fighters don't get that, but there it is.



Perhaps fighter was considered too attractive of a "dip" with fighting style and second wind also at first level and very attractive additional features at second and third. But that's just speculation. Whatever the reason, if you want heavy armor proficiency from fighter (or paladin), you need to take that as your first-level class.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



You are not missing something. Multiclassing into fighter only gives light and medium armor proficiency (as well as shields and simple and martial weapons). You would have to also take the Heavily Armored feat to get heavy armor proficiency.



Somewhat oddly, while multiclassing into cleric only gives light and medium armor plus shields, it also gives you full access to the cleric domains, several of which give heavy armor proficiency. It doesn't seem quite fair that fighters don't get that, but there it is.



Perhaps fighter was considered too attractive of a "dip" with fighting style and second wind also at first level and very attractive additional features at second and third. But that's just speculation. Whatever the reason, if you want heavy armor proficiency from fighter (or paladin), you need to take that as your first-level class.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 3 hours ago

























answered 3 hours ago









mattdmmattdm

16.6k877122




16.6k877122












  • $begingroup$
    Excellent, thankyou. I don't have the rep to uptick yet or I would
    $endgroup$
    – M.T. Black
    3 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Excellent, thankyou. I don't have the rep to uptick yet or I would
    $endgroup$
    – M.T. Black
    3 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Excellent, thankyou. I don't have the rep to uptick yet or I would
$endgroup$
– M.T. Black
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
Excellent, thankyou. I don't have the rep to uptick yet or I would
$endgroup$
– M.T. Black
3 hours ago










M.T. Black is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















M.T. Black is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













M.T. Black is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












M.T. Black is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143308%2fdoes-multi-classing-into-fighter-give-you-heavy-armor-proficiency%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Costa Masnaga

Fotorealismo

Sidney Franklin