Is this code better written using ternary conditional or switch or if-else?
$begingroup$
When I'm checking some conditions to return one of a small handful of values, I often end up nesting several ternary conditional operators (?:) rather than using a series of if..elseif statements.
As a simple example of this, presume I have:
public enum StringValueType
{
Null,
Empty,
Short,
Long
}
public string Value { get; set; }
I'm trying to return the appropriate StringValueType value in a property:
public StringValueType ValueType =>
Value == null ? StringValueType.Null
: Value == string.Empty ? StringValueType.Empty
: Value.Length < 8 ? StringValueType.Short
: StringValueType.Long;
Is this readable? Are there downsides? I'm not sure I've ever come across this in other people's code before.
For comparison, some alternate ways this might be written:
If-else
public StringValueType ValueType
{
get
{
if (Value == null)
return StringValueType.Null;
else if (Value == string.Empty)
return StringValueType.Empty;
else if (Value.Length < 8)
return StringValueType.Short;
else
return StringValueType.Long;
}
}
Switch+Conditional
public StringValueType ValueType
{
get
{
switch (MatchedDefinitionName)
{
case null:
return StringValueType.Null;
case "":
return StringValueType.Empty;
default:
return Value.Length < 8 ? StringValueType.Short : StringValueType.Long;
}
}
}
c#
asked 4 mins ago
gregmacgregmac
1011
New contributor
gregmac is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When I'm checking some conditions to return one of a small handful of values, I often end up nesting several ternary conditional operators (?:) rather than using a series of if..elseif statements.
As a simple example of this, presume I have:
public enum StringValueType
{
Null,
Empty,
Short,
Long
}
public string Value { get; set; }
I'm trying to return the appropriate StringValueType value in a property:
public StringValueType ValueType =>
Value == null ? StringValueType.Null
: Value == string.Empty ? StringValueType.Empty
: Value.Length < 8 ? StringValueType.Short
: StringValueType.Long;
Is this readable? Are there downsides? I'm not sure I've ever come across this in other people's code before.
For comparison, some alternate ways this might be written:
If-else
public StringValueType ValueType
{
get
{
if (Value == null)
return StringValueType.Null;
else if (Value == string.Empty)
return StringValueType.Empty;
else if (Value.Length < 8)
return StringValueType.Short;
else
return StringValueType.Long;
}
}
Switch+Conditional
public StringValueType ValueType
{
get
{
switch (MatchedDefinitionName)
{
case null:
return StringValueType.Null;
case "":
return StringValueType.Empty;
default:
return Value.Length < 8 ? StringValueType.Short : StringValueType.Long;
}
}
}
c#
asked 4 mins ago
gregmacgregmac
1011
New contributor
gregmac is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When I'm checking some conditions to return one of a small handful of values, I often end up nesting several ternary conditional operators (?:) rather than using a series of if..elseif statements.
As a simple example of this, presume I have:
public enum StringValueType
{
Null,
Empty,
Short,
Long
}
public string Value { get; set; }
I'm trying to return the appropriate StringValueType value in a property:
public StringValueType ValueType =>
Value == null ? StringValueType.Null
: Value == string.Empty ? StringValueType.Empty
: Value.Length < 8 ? StringValueType.Short
: StringValueType.Long;
Is this readable? Are there downsides? I'm not sure I've ever come across this in other people's code before.
For comparison, some alternate ways this might be written:
If-else
public StringValueType ValueType
{
get
{
if (Value == null)
return StringValueType.Null;
else if (Value == string.Empty)
return StringValueType.Empty;
else if (Value.Length < 8)
return StringValueType.Short;
else
return StringValueType.Long;
}
}
Switch+Conditional
public StringValueType ValueType
{
get
{
switch (MatchedDefinitionName)
{
case null:
return StringValueType.Null;
case "":
return StringValueType.Empty;
default:
return Value.Length < 8 ? StringValueType.Short : StringValueType.Long;
}
}
}
c#
asked 4 mins ago
gregmacgregmac
1011
New contributor
gregmac is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
When I'm checking some conditions to return one of a small handful of values, I often end up nesting several ternary conditional operators (?:) rather than using a series of if..elseif statements.
As a simple example of this, presume I have:
public enum StringValueType
{
Null,
Empty,
Short,
Long
}
public string Value { get; set; }
I'm trying to return the appropriate StringValueType value in a property:
public StringValueType ValueType =>
Value == null ? StringValueType.Null
: Value == string.Empty ? StringValueType.Empty
: Value.Length < 8 ? StringValueType.Short
: StringValueType.Long;
Is this readable? Are there downsides? I'm not sure I've ever come across this in other people's code before.
For comparison, some alternate ways this might be written:
If-else
public StringValueType ValueType
{
get
{
if (Value == null)
return StringValueType.Null;
else if (Value == string.Empty)
return StringValueType.Empty;
else if (Value.Length < 8)
return StringValueType.Short;
else
return StringValueType.Long;
}
}
Switch+Conditional
public StringValueType ValueType
{
get
{
switch (MatchedDefinitionName)
{
case null:
return StringValueType.Null;
case "":
return StringValueType.Empty;
default:
return Value.Length < 8 ? StringValueType.Short : StringValueType.Long;
}
}
}
c#
c#
asked 4 mins ago
gregmacgregmac
1011
New contributor
gregmac is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 4 mins ago
gregmacgregmac
1011
New contributor
gregmac is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 4 mins ago
gregmacgregmac
1011
New contributor
gregmac is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 4 mins ago
gregmacgregmac
1011
asked 4 mins ago
gregmacgregmac
1011
1011
New contributor
gregmac is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
gregmac is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
gregmac is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
gregmac is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f212116%2fis-this-code-better-written-using-ternary-conditional-or-switch-or-if-else%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
gregmac is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
gregmac is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
gregmac is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
gregmac is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f212116%2fis-this-code-better-written-using-ternary-conditional-or-switch-or-if-else%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
