sbt-assembly not found when building Spark 0.5
I am trying to build the 0.5 branch of Spark, but it raises errors:
sbt.ResolveException: unresolved dependency: com.eed3si9n#sbt-assembly;0.8.3: not found
Hence, I download the ivys and jars manually from dl.bintray.com, and put them into my local .ivy folder.
To be specific, I create a sbt-assembly under com.eed3si9n, and I rename files as:
However, this does not work. What is the correct solution?
scala apache-spark sbt
asked Nov 22 '18 at 6:38
chenzhongpuchenzhongpu
2,26742451
add a comment |
I am trying to build the 0.5 branch of Spark, but it raises errors:
sbt.ResolveException: unresolved dependency: com.eed3si9n#sbt-assembly;0.8.3: not found
Hence, I download the ivys and jars manually from dl.bintray.com, and put them into my local .ivy folder.
To be specific, I create a sbt-assembly under com.eed3si9n, and I rename files as:
However, this does not work. What is the correct solution?
scala apache-spark sbt
asked Nov 22 '18 at 6:38
chenzhongpuchenzhongpu
2,26742451
I'm curious why you need such an old Spark version?
– Jacek Laskowski
Dec 25 '18 at 22:13
@JacekLaskowski bcz I am trying to fully understand its source code, and the 0.5 brach is in its initial form. Hence, I think it is a good start from it.
– chenzhongpu
Dec 27 '18 at 1:44
Have fun! I'm a bit doubtful about the results. I'd rather start with the latest and greatest even though the codebase could be overwhelming. The base has not changed that much (and even if it did, it's more worthwhile to know how things are now not back then, isn't it?). Ping me offline to discuss it.
– Jacek Laskowski
Dec 27 '18 at 9:34
add a comment |
I am trying to build the 0.5 branch of Spark, but it raises errors:
sbt.ResolveException: unresolved dependency: com.eed3si9n#sbt-assembly;0.8.3: not found
Hence, I download the ivys and jars manually from dl.bintray.com, and put them into my local .ivy folder.
To be specific, I create a sbt-assembly under com.eed3si9n, and I rename files as:
However, this does not work. What is the correct solution?
scala apache-spark sbt
asked Nov 22 '18 at 6:38
chenzhongpuchenzhongpu
2,26742451
I am trying to build the 0.5 branch of Spark, but it raises errors:
sbt.ResolveException: unresolved dependency: com.eed3si9n#sbt-assembly;0.8.3: not found
Hence, I download the ivys and jars manually from dl.bintray.com, and put them into my local .ivy folder.
To be specific, I create a sbt-assembly under com.eed3si9n, and I rename files as:
However, this does not work. What is the correct solution?
scala apache-spark sbt
scala apache-spark sbt
asked Nov 22 '18 at 6:38
chenzhongpuchenzhongpu
2,26742451
asked Nov 22 '18 at 6:38
chenzhongpuchenzhongpu
2,26742451
asked Nov 22 '18 at 6:38
chenzhongpuchenzhongpu
2,26742451
asked Nov 22 '18 at 6:38
chenzhongpuchenzhongpu
2,26742451
asked Nov 22 '18 at 6:38
chenzhongpuchenzhongpu
2,26742451
2,26742451
I'm curious why you need such an old Spark version?
– Jacek Laskowski
Dec 25 '18 at 22:13
@JacekLaskowski bcz I am trying to fully understand its source code, and the 0.5 brach is in its initial form. Hence, I think it is a good start from it.
– chenzhongpu
Dec 27 '18 at 1:44
Have fun! I'm a bit doubtful about the results. I'd rather start with the latest and greatest even though the codebase could be overwhelming. The base has not changed that much (and even if it did, it's more worthwhile to know how things are now not back then, isn't it?). Ping me offline to discuss it.
– Jacek Laskowski
Dec 27 '18 at 9:34
add a comment |
I'm curious why you need such an old Spark version?
– Jacek Laskowski
Dec 25 '18 at 22:13
@JacekLaskowski bcz I am trying to fully understand its source code, and the 0.5 brach is in its initial form. Hence, I think it is a good start from it.
– chenzhongpu
Dec 27 '18 at 1:44
Have fun! I'm a bit doubtful about the results. I'd rather start with the latest and greatest even though the codebase could be overwhelming. The base has not changed that much (and even if it did, it's more worthwhile to know how things are now not back then, isn't it?). Ping me offline to discuss it.
– Jacek Laskowski
Dec 27 '18 at 9:34
I'm curious why you need such an old Spark version?
– Jacek Laskowski
Dec 25 '18 at 22:13
I'm curious why you need such an old Spark version?
– Jacek Laskowski
Dec 25 '18 at 22:13
@JacekLaskowski bcz I am trying to fully understand its source code, and the 0.5 brach is in its initial form. Hence, I think it is a good start from it.
– chenzhongpu
Dec 27 '18 at 1:44
@JacekLaskowski bcz I am trying to fully understand its source code, and the 0.5 brach is in its initial form. Hence, I think it is a good start from it.
– chenzhongpu
Dec 27 '18 at 1:44
Have fun! I'm a bit doubtful about the results. I'd rather start with the latest and greatest even though the codebase could be overwhelming. The base has not changed that much (and even if it did, it's more worthwhile to know how things are now not back then, isn't it?). Ping me offline to discuss it.
– Jacek Laskowski
Dec 27 '18 at 9:34
Have fun! I'm a bit doubtful about the results. I'd rather start with the latest and greatest even though the codebase could be overwhelming. The base has not changed that much (and even if it did, it's more worthwhile to know how things are now not back then, isn't it?). Ping me offline to discuss it.
– Jacek Laskowski
Dec 27 '18 at 9:34
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Spark branch-0.5 uses sbt 0.11.3 according to project/build.properties, so that's pretty old.
sbt community repository location
There's a bug in project/plugins.sbt. It's pointing to scalasbt.artifactoryonline.com, but it should point to repo.scala-sbt.org.
$ git diff
diff --git a/project/plugins.sbt b/project/plugins.sbt
index 63d789d0c1..70dcfdba00 100644
--- a/project/plugins.sbt
+++ b/project/plugins.sbt
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
resolvers ++= Seq(
"sbt-idea-repo" at "http://mpeltonen.github.com/maven/",
Classpaths.typesafeResolver,
- Resolver.url("sbt-plugin-releases", new URL("http://scalasbt.artifactoryonline.com/scalasbt/sbt-plugin-releases/"))(Resolver.ivyStylePatterns)
+ Resolver.url("sbt-plugin-releases", new URL("http://repo.scala-sbt.org/scalasbt/sbt-plugin-releases/"))(Resolver.ivyStylePatterns)
)
JDK 1.6
To run older version of sbt, it's necessary to use older JDK. In this case, JDK 1.6. On macOS, however, there's an issue with JLine with JDK 1.6, so I had to disable JLine.
$ jenv shell 1.6
$ java -version
java version "1.6.0_65"
...
$ sbt/sbt -Djline.terminal=jline.UnsupportedTerminal
This should get the sbt shell started. Once it comes up, type in:
> package
answered Nov 22 '18 at 7:38
Eugene YokotaEugene Yokota
73.3k39180276
Thanks. Since the source code of 0.5 branch is in a much smaller scale, I think it is good to read the source code based that branch. BTW, how can I determine the correctJDKversion for different version ofSpark? does it mainly depend on theScalaversion used?
– chenzhongpu
Nov 22 '18 at 8:57
Basically. You can sort of guess the stable JDK version based on the date. JDK 1.7 came out in 2011 so maybe it works too, but JDK 1.6 would be a safer bet.
– Eugene Yokota
Nov 22 '18 at 10:18
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53425169%2fsbt-assembly-not-found-when-building-spark-0-5%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Spark branch-0.5 uses sbt 0.11.3 according to project/build.properties, so that's pretty old.
sbt community repository location
There's a bug in project/plugins.sbt. It's pointing to scalasbt.artifactoryonline.com, but it should point to repo.scala-sbt.org.
$ git diff
diff --git a/project/plugins.sbt b/project/plugins.sbt
index 63d789d0c1..70dcfdba00 100644
--- a/project/plugins.sbt
+++ b/project/plugins.sbt
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
resolvers ++= Seq(
"sbt-idea-repo" at "http://mpeltonen.github.com/maven/",
Classpaths.typesafeResolver,
- Resolver.url("sbt-plugin-releases", new URL("http://scalasbt.artifactoryonline.com/scalasbt/sbt-plugin-releases/"))(Resolver.ivyStylePatterns)
+ Resolver.url("sbt-plugin-releases", new URL("http://repo.scala-sbt.org/scalasbt/sbt-plugin-releases/"))(Resolver.ivyStylePatterns)
)
JDK 1.6
To run older version of sbt, it's necessary to use older JDK. In this case, JDK 1.6. On macOS, however, there's an issue with JLine with JDK 1.6, so I had to disable JLine.
$ jenv shell 1.6
$ java -version
java version "1.6.0_65"
...
$ sbt/sbt -Djline.terminal=jline.UnsupportedTerminal
This should get the sbt shell started. Once it comes up, type in:
> package
answered Nov 22 '18 at 7:38
Eugene YokotaEugene Yokota
73.3k39180276
Thanks. Since the source code of 0.5 branch is in a much smaller scale, I think it is good to read the source code based that branch. BTW, how can I determine the correctJDKversion for different version ofSpark? does it mainly depend on theScalaversion used?
– chenzhongpu
Nov 22 '18 at 8:57
Basically. You can sort of guess the stable JDK version based on the date. JDK 1.7 came out in 2011 so maybe it works too, but JDK 1.6 would be a safer bet.
– Eugene Yokota
Nov 22 '18 at 10:18
add a comment |
Spark branch-0.5 uses sbt 0.11.3 according to project/build.properties, so that's pretty old.
sbt community repository location
There's a bug in project/plugins.sbt. It's pointing to scalasbt.artifactoryonline.com, but it should point to repo.scala-sbt.org.
$ git diff
diff --git a/project/plugins.sbt b/project/plugins.sbt
index 63d789d0c1..70dcfdba00 100644
--- a/project/plugins.sbt
+++ b/project/plugins.sbt
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
resolvers ++= Seq(
"sbt-idea-repo" at "http://mpeltonen.github.com/maven/",
Classpaths.typesafeResolver,
- Resolver.url("sbt-plugin-releases", new URL("http://scalasbt.artifactoryonline.com/scalasbt/sbt-plugin-releases/"))(Resolver.ivyStylePatterns)
+ Resolver.url("sbt-plugin-releases", new URL("http://repo.scala-sbt.org/scalasbt/sbt-plugin-releases/"))(Resolver.ivyStylePatterns)
)
JDK 1.6
To run older version of sbt, it's necessary to use older JDK. In this case, JDK 1.6. On macOS, however, there's an issue with JLine with JDK 1.6, so I had to disable JLine.
$ jenv shell 1.6
$ java -version
java version "1.6.0_65"
...
$ sbt/sbt -Djline.terminal=jline.UnsupportedTerminal
This should get the sbt shell started. Once it comes up, type in:
> package
answered Nov 22 '18 at 7:38
Eugene YokotaEugene Yokota
73.3k39180276
Thanks. Since the source code of 0.5 branch is in a much smaller scale, I think it is good to read the source code based that branch. BTW, how can I determine the correctJDKversion for different version ofSpark? does it mainly depend on theScalaversion used?
– chenzhongpu
Nov 22 '18 at 8:57
Basically. You can sort of guess the stable JDK version based on the date. JDK 1.7 came out in 2011 so maybe it works too, but JDK 1.6 would be a safer bet.
– Eugene Yokota
Nov 22 '18 at 10:18
add a comment |
Spark branch-0.5 uses sbt 0.11.3 according to project/build.properties, so that's pretty old.
sbt community repository location
There's a bug in project/plugins.sbt. It's pointing to scalasbt.artifactoryonline.com, but it should point to repo.scala-sbt.org.
$ git diff
diff --git a/project/plugins.sbt b/project/plugins.sbt
index 63d789d0c1..70dcfdba00 100644
--- a/project/plugins.sbt
+++ b/project/plugins.sbt
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
resolvers ++= Seq(
"sbt-idea-repo" at "http://mpeltonen.github.com/maven/",
Classpaths.typesafeResolver,
- Resolver.url("sbt-plugin-releases", new URL("http://scalasbt.artifactoryonline.com/scalasbt/sbt-plugin-releases/"))(Resolver.ivyStylePatterns)
+ Resolver.url("sbt-plugin-releases", new URL("http://repo.scala-sbt.org/scalasbt/sbt-plugin-releases/"))(Resolver.ivyStylePatterns)
)
JDK 1.6
To run older version of sbt, it's necessary to use older JDK. In this case, JDK 1.6. On macOS, however, there's an issue with JLine with JDK 1.6, so I had to disable JLine.
$ jenv shell 1.6
$ java -version
java version "1.6.0_65"
...
$ sbt/sbt -Djline.terminal=jline.UnsupportedTerminal
This should get the sbt shell started. Once it comes up, type in:
> package
answered Nov 22 '18 at 7:38
Eugene YokotaEugene Yokota
73.3k39180276
Spark branch-0.5 uses sbt 0.11.3 according to project/build.properties, so that's pretty old.
sbt community repository location
There's a bug in project/plugins.sbt. It's pointing to scalasbt.artifactoryonline.com, but it should point to repo.scala-sbt.org.
$ git diff
diff --git a/project/plugins.sbt b/project/plugins.sbt
index 63d789d0c1..70dcfdba00 100644
--- a/project/plugins.sbt
+++ b/project/plugins.sbt
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
resolvers ++= Seq(
"sbt-idea-repo" at "http://mpeltonen.github.com/maven/",
Classpaths.typesafeResolver,
- Resolver.url("sbt-plugin-releases", new URL("http://scalasbt.artifactoryonline.com/scalasbt/sbt-plugin-releases/"))(Resolver.ivyStylePatterns)
+ Resolver.url("sbt-plugin-releases", new URL("http://repo.scala-sbt.org/scalasbt/sbt-plugin-releases/"))(Resolver.ivyStylePatterns)
)
JDK 1.6
To run older version of sbt, it's necessary to use older JDK. In this case, JDK 1.6. On macOS, however, there's an issue with JLine with JDK 1.6, so I had to disable JLine.
$ jenv shell 1.6
$ java -version
java version "1.6.0_65"
...
$ sbt/sbt -Djline.terminal=jline.UnsupportedTerminal
This should get the sbt shell started. Once it comes up, type in:
> package
answered Nov 22 '18 at 7:38
Eugene YokotaEugene Yokota
73.3k39180276
answered Nov 22 '18 at 7:38
Eugene YokotaEugene Yokota
73.3k39180276
answered Nov 22 '18 at 7:38
Eugene YokotaEugene Yokota
73.3k39180276
answered Nov 22 '18 at 7:38
Eugene YokotaEugene Yokota
73.3k39180276
73.3k39180276
Thanks. Since the source code of 0.5 branch is in a much smaller scale, I think it is good to read the source code based that branch. BTW, how can I determine the correctJDKversion for different version ofSpark? does it mainly depend on theScalaversion used?
– chenzhongpu
Nov 22 '18 at 8:57
Basically. You can sort of guess the stable JDK version based on the date. JDK 1.7 came out in 2011 so maybe it works too, but JDK 1.6 would be a safer bet.
– Eugene Yokota
Nov 22 '18 at 10:18
add a comment |
Thanks. Since the source code of 0.5 branch is in a much smaller scale, I think it is good to read the source code based that branch. BTW, how can I determine the correctJDKversion for different version ofSpark? does it mainly depend on theScalaversion used?
– chenzhongpu
Nov 22 '18 at 8:57
Basically. You can sort of guess the stable JDK version based on the date. JDK 1.7 came out in 2011 so maybe it works too, but JDK 1.6 would be a safer bet.
– Eugene Yokota
Nov 22 '18 at 10:18
Thanks. Since the source code of 0.5 branch is in a much smaller scale, I think it is good to read the source code based that branch. BTW, how can I determine the correct
JDK version for different version of Spark? does it mainly depend on the Scala version used?– chenzhongpu
Nov 22 '18 at 8:57
Thanks. Since the source code of 0.5 branch is in a much smaller scale, I think it is good to read the source code based that branch. BTW, how can I determine the correct
JDK version for different version of Spark? does it mainly depend on the Scala version used?– chenzhongpu
Nov 22 '18 at 8:57
Basically. You can sort of guess the stable JDK version based on the date. JDK 1.7 came out in 2011 so maybe it works too, but JDK 1.6 would be a safer bet.
– Eugene Yokota
Nov 22 '18 at 10:18
Basically. You can sort of guess the stable JDK version based on the date. JDK 1.7 came out in 2011 so maybe it works too, but JDK 1.6 would be a safer bet.
– Eugene Yokota
Nov 22 '18 at 10:18
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53425169%2fsbt-assembly-not-found-when-building-spark-0-5%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I'm curious why you need such an old Spark version?
– Jacek Laskowski
Dec 25 '18 at 22:13
@JacekLaskowski bcz I am trying to fully understand its source code, and the 0.5 brach is in its initial form. Hence, I think it is a good start from it.
– chenzhongpu
Dec 27 '18 at 1:44
Have fun! I'm a bit doubtful about the results. I'd rather start with the latest and greatest even though the codebase could be overwhelming. The base has not changed that much (and even if it did, it's more worthwhile to know how things are now not back then, isn't it?). Ping me offline to discuss it.
– Jacek Laskowski
Dec 27 '18 at 9:34