Question about point mass prior and continuous distribution





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}






up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Suppose we have a point mass prior,



$$theta sim begin{cases} I(theta=1) ,& prob=frac{1}{2} \
Gamma(c,c), & prob=frac{1}{2} end{cases}$$



Then if we are asked



$lim_{c to infty} P(theta=1)$



Now here is the issue, since Gamma is a continuous distribution, it seems that in the case of gamma,we will never have $theta=1$.



To me it thus seems that regardless of the value of c, the $p(theta=1)=frac{1}{2}$



However, we also have that since expected value of a $gamma(a,b)=frac{a}{b}$ so that the expected value of the gamma is 1 when we have $a=b=c$



But, by Markov, for $X sim Gamma(c,c)$



$lim_{c to infty} Pr(|X-mu| lt epsilon) to 1$ for any $epsilon gt 0$



So is $lim_{c to infty}P(theta=1) =1$ , or is $lim_{c to infty}P(theta=1)=frac{1}{2}$



As even though the markov inequality holds, it is a continous distirbution, so we will never have it exactly equal to 1.



Thanks all










share|cite|improve this question






























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    Suppose we have a point mass prior,



    $$theta sim begin{cases} I(theta=1) ,& prob=frac{1}{2} \
    Gamma(c,c), & prob=frac{1}{2} end{cases}$$



    Then if we are asked



    $lim_{c to infty} P(theta=1)$



    Now here is the issue, since Gamma is a continuous distribution, it seems that in the case of gamma,we will never have $theta=1$.



    To me it thus seems that regardless of the value of c, the $p(theta=1)=frac{1}{2}$



    However, we also have that since expected value of a $gamma(a,b)=frac{a}{b}$ so that the expected value of the gamma is 1 when we have $a=b=c$



    But, by Markov, for $X sim Gamma(c,c)$



    $lim_{c to infty} Pr(|X-mu| lt epsilon) to 1$ for any $epsilon gt 0$



    So is $lim_{c to infty}P(theta=1) =1$ , or is $lim_{c to infty}P(theta=1)=frac{1}{2}$



    As even though the markov inequality holds, it is a continous distirbution, so we will never have it exactly equal to 1.



    Thanks all










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      Suppose we have a point mass prior,



      $$theta sim begin{cases} I(theta=1) ,& prob=frac{1}{2} \
      Gamma(c,c), & prob=frac{1}{2} end{cases}$$



      Then if we are asked



      $lim_{c to infty} P(theta=1)$



      Now here is the issue, since Gamma is a continuous distribution, it seems that in the case of gamma,we will never have $theta=1$.



      To me it thus seems that regardless of the value of c, the $p(theta=1)=frac{1}{2}$



      However, we also have that since expected value of a $gamma(a,b)=frac{a}{b}$ so that the expected value of the gamma is 1 when we have $a=b=c$



      But, by Markov, for $X sim Gamma(c,c)$



      $lim_{c to infty} Pr(|X-mu| lt epsilon) to 1$ for any $epsilon gt 0$



      So is $lim_{c to infty}P(theta=1) =1$ , or is $lim_{c to infty}P(theta=1)=frac{1}{2}$



      As even though the markov inequality holds, it is a continous distirbution, so we will never have it exactly equal to 1.



      Thanks all










      share|cite|improve this question















      Suppose we have a point mass prior,



      $$theta sim begin{cases} I(theta=1) ,& prob=frac{1}{2} \
      Gamma(c,c), & prob=frac{1}{2} end{cases}$$



      Then if we are asked



      $lim_{c to infty} P(theta=1)$



      Now here is the issue, since Gamma is a continuous distribution, it seems that in the case of gamma,we will never have $theta=1$.



      To me it thus seems that regardless of the value of c, the $p(theta=1)=frac{1}{2}$



      However, we also have that since expected value of a $gamma(a,b)=frac{a}{b}$ so that the expected value of the gamma is 1 when we have $a=b=c$



      But, by Markov, for $X sim Gamma(c,c)$



      $lim_{c to infty} Pr(|X-mu| lt epsilon) to 1$ for any $epsilon gt 0$



      So is $lim_{c to infty}P(theta=1) =1$ , or is $lim_{c to infty}P(theta=1)=frac{1}{2}$



      As even though the markov inequality holds, it is a continous distirbution, so we will never have it exactly equal to 1.



      Thanks all







      bayesian continuous-data






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 4 hours ago

























      asked 5 hours ago









      Learning

      418




      418






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted










          Your specified prior distribution is a mixture of a continuous and discrete part. Let $I sim text{Bern}(1/2)$ be the indicator that the parameter is taken from the gamma distribution. Then using the law of total probability you have:



          $$begin{equation} begin{aligned}
          mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c)
          &= mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c, I=0) cdot mathbb{P}(I=0) + mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c, I=1) cdot mathbb{P}(I=1) \[6pt]
          &= frac{1}{2} cdot mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c, I=0) + frac{1}{2} cdot mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c, I=1) \[6pt]
          &= frac{1}{2} + frac{1}{2} cdot mathbb{P}(theta = 1| theta sim text{Ga}(c,c)) \[6pt]
          &= frac{1}{2}. \[6pt]
          end{aligned} end{equation}$$



          (Note that the last step comes from recognising that the gamma is a continuous distribution, so the probability of a specific point is zero under this distribution.) This result holds for all values of $c$, so you are correct that it also holds in the limit:



          $$lim_{c rightarrow infty} mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c) = lim_{c rightarrow infty} frac{1}{2} = frac{1}{2}.$$



          Your later use of Chebychev's inequality shows that as $c rightarrow infty$ you get $theta rightarrow 1$ (convergence in probability), but this does not change the fact that $mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c) = 1/2$ for all $c > 0$. (To understand the reason for this more fully, have a read about the distinction between convergence in probability and almost-sure convergence.)






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "65"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f379550%2fquestion-about-point-mass-prior-and-continuous-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            3
            down vote



            accepted










            Your specified prior distribution is a mixture of a continuous and discrete part. Let $I sim text{Bern}(1/2)$ be the indicator that the parameter is taken from the gamma distribution. Then using the law of total probability you have:



            $$begin{equation} begin{aligned}
            mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c)
            &= mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c, I=0) cdot mathbb{P}(I=0) + mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c, I=1) cdot mathbb{P}(I=1) \[6pt]
            &= frac{1}{2} cdot mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c, I=0) + frac{1}{2} cdot mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c, I=1) \[6pt]
            &= frac{1}{2} + frac{1}{2} cdot mathbb{P}(theta = 1| theta sim text{Ga}(c,c)) \[6pt]
            &= frac{1}{2}. \[6pt]
            end{aligned} end{equation}$$



            (Note that the last step comes from recognising that the gamma is a continuous distribution, so the probability of a specific point is zero under this distribution.) This result holds for all values of $c$, so you are correct that it also holds in the limit:



            $$lim_{c rightarrow infty} mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c) = lim_{c rightarrow infty} frac{1}{2} = frac{1}{2}.$$



            Your later use of Chebychev's inequality shows that as $c rightarrow infty$ you get $theta rightarrow 1$ (convergence in probability), but this does not change the fact that $mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c) = 1/2$ for all $c > 0$. (To understand the reason for this more fully, have a read about the distinction between convergence in probability and almost-sure convergence.)






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              3
              down vote



              accepted










              Your specified prior distribution is a mixture of a continuous and discrete part. Let $I sim text{Bern}(1/2)$ be the indicator that the parameter is taken from the gamma distribution. Then using the law of total probability you have:



              $$begin{equation} begin{aligned}
              mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c)
              &= mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c, I=0) cdot mathbb{P}(I=0) + mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c, I=1) cdot mathbb{P}(I=1) \[6pt]
              &= frac{1}{2} cdot mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c, I=0) + frac{1}{2} cdot mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c, I=1) \[6pt]
              &= frac{1}{2} + frac{1}{2} cdot mathbb{P}(theta = 1| theta sim text{Ga}(c,c)) \[6pt]
              &= frac{1}{2}. \[6pt]
              end{aligned} end{equation}$$



              (Note that the last step comes from recognising that the gamma is a continuous distribution, so the probability of a specific point is zero under this distribution.) This result holds for all values of $c$, so you are correct that it also holds in the limit:



              $$lim_{c rightarrow infty} mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c) = lim_{c rightarrow infty} frac{1}{2} = frac{1}{2}.$$



              Your later use of Chebychev's inequality shows that as $c rightarrow infty$ you get $theta rightarrow 1$ (convergence in probability), but this does not change the fact that $mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c) = 1/2$ for all $c > 0$. (To understand the reason for this more fully, have a read about the distinction between convergence in probability and almost-sure convergence.)






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                3
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                3
                down vote



                accepted






                Your specified prior distribution is a mixture of a continuous and discrete part. Let $I sim text{Bern}(1/2)$ be the indicator that the parameter is taken from the gamma distribution. Then using the law of total probability you have:



                $$begin{equation} begin{aligned}
                mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c)
                &= mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c, I=0) cdot mathbb{P}(I=0) + mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c, I=1) cdot mathbb{P}(I=1) \[6pt]
                &= frac{1}{2} cdot mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c, I=0) + frac{1}{2} cdot mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c, I=1) \[6pt]
                &= frac{1}{2} + frac{1}{2} cdot mathbb{P}(theta = 1| theta sim text{Ga}(c,c)) \[6pt]
                &= frac{1}{2}. \[6pt]
                end{aligned} end{equation}$$



                (Note that the last step comes from recognising that the gamma is a continuous distribution, so the probability of a specific point is zero under this distribution.) This result holds for all values of $c$, so you are correct that it also holds in the limit:



                $$lim_{c rightarrow infty} mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c) = lim_{c rightarrow infty} frac{1}{2} = frac{1}{2}.$$



                Your later use of Chebychev's inequality shows that as $c rightarrow infty$ you get $theta rightarrow 1$ (convergence in probability), but this does not change the fact that $mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c) = 1/2$ for all $c > 0$. (To understand the reason for this more fully, have a read about the distinction between convergence in probability and almost-sure convergence.)






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Your specified prior distribution is a mixture of a continuous and discrete part. Let $I sim text{Bern}(1/2)$ be the indicator that the parameter is taken from the gamma distribution. Then using the law of total probability you have:



                $$begin{equation} begin{aligned}
                mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c)
                &= mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c, I=0) cdot mathbb{P}(I=0) + mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c, I=1) cdot mathbb{P}(I=1) \[6pt]
                &= frac{1}{2} cdot mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c, I=0) + frac{1}{2} cdot mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c, I=1) \[6pt]
                &= frac{1}{2} + frac{1}{2} cdot mathbb{P}(theta = 1| theta sim text{Ga}(c,c)) \[6pt]
                &= frac{1}{2}. \[6pt]
                end{aligned} end{equation}$$



                (Note that the last step comes from recognising that the gamma is a continuous distribution, so the probability of a specific point is zero under this distribution.) This result holds for all values of $c$, so you are correct that it also holds in the limit:



                $$lim_{c rightarrow infty} mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c) = lim_{c rightarrow infty} frac{1}{2} = frac{1}{2}.$$



                Your later use of Chebychev's inequality shows that as $c rightarrow infty$ you get $theta rightarrow 1$ (convergence in probability), but this does not change the fact that $mathbb{P}(theta = 1|c) = 1/2$ for all $c > 0$. (To understand the reason for this more fully, have a read about the distinction between convergence in probability and almost-sure convergence.)







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 4 hours ago









                Ben

                19.5k22295




                19.5k22295






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f379550%2fquestion-about-point-mass-prior-and-continuous-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Costa Masnaga

                    Fotorealismo

                    Sidney Franklin