Extracting and reformatting dates from text
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
The task is find by pattern d--m--y---- all occurrences in text, reformat it to yyyy:mm:dd and print it separately from initial text. Actually I done all except formatting. And even in my written code I have some doubts because I just begun to learn this language. Maybe someone would help me and say what's wrong with my code and how to finish that task on a better way. Any comments are appreciated.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#define MAXLINE 1000
#define CONT 1000000
int getlin(char *, int);
int pickDates(char *, char *);
int isDate(char *, int);
int main()
{
int len;
char line[MAXLINE];
char accum[CONT];
char *dates = malloc(sizeof(char *) * CONT);
while ((len = getlin(line, MAXLINE)) > 0)
strcat(accum, line);
pickDates(dates, accum);
printf("%sn", dates);
free(dates);
return 0;
}
int getlin(char *s, int lim) {
int i, c, j = 0;
for (i = 0; (c = getchar()) != EOF && c != 'n'; ++i)
if (i < lim - 2)
{
s[j] = c;
++j;
}
if (c == 'n')
{
s[j] = c;
++i;
++j;
}
s[j] = '';
return i;
}
int pickDates(char *dates, char *cont)
{
int j = 0;
const char *template = "d--m--y----";
char *date;
int temp_len = strlen(template);
for (int i = 0; i < strlen(cont); i++)
if (cont[i] == template[0] && cont[i+3] == template[3] && cont[i+6] == template[6])
{
date = malloc(sizeof(char) * temp_len);
memcpy(date, &cont[i], temp_len);
if (isDate(date, temp_len))
{
j += 8;
strcat(dates, date);
}
free(date);
}
dates = realloc(dates, sizeof(char) * j);
return 0;
}
int isDate(char *date_str, int len)
{
int i = 0;
int dd = atoi(&date_str[i+1]);
int mm = atoi(&date_str[i+4]);
int yy = atoi(&date_str[i+7]);
char tmp[5] = {'0'};
memset(date_str, 0, len - 3);
date_str = realloc(date_str, sizeof(char) * (len - 3));
if (dd < 32 && dd > 0 && mm < 13 && mm > 0 && yy > 0)
{
sprintf(tmp, "%04d", yy);
strcat(date_str, tmp);
sprintf(tmp, "%02d", mm);
strcat(date_str, tmp);
sprintf(tmp, "%02d", dd);
strcat(date_str, tmp);
return 1;
}
else return -1;
}
beginner c datetime
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
The task is find by pattern d--m--y---- all occurrences in text, reformat it to yyyy:mm:dd and print it separately from initial text. Actually I done all except formatting. And even in my written code I have some doubts because I just begun to learn this language. Maybe someone would help me and say what's wrong with my code and how to finish that task on a better way. Any comments are appreciated.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#define MAXLINE 1000
#define CONT 1000000
int getlin(char *, int);
int pickDates(char *, char *);
int isDate(char *, int);
int main()
{
int len;
char line[MAXLINE];
char accum[CONT];
char *dates = malloc(sizeof(char *) * CONT);
while ((len = getlin(line, MAXLINE)) > 0)
strcat(accum, line);
pickDates(dates, accum);
printf("%sn", dates);
free(dates);
return 0;
}
int getlin(char *s, int lim) {
int i, c, j = 0;
for (i = 0; (c = getchar()) != EOF && c != 'n'; ++i)
if (i < lim - 2)
{
s[j] = c;
++j;
}
if (c == 'n')
{
s[j] = c;
++i;
++j;
}
s[j] = '';
return i;
}
int pickDates(char *dates, char *cont)
{
int j = 0;
const char *template = "d--m--y----";
char *date;
int temp_len = strlen(template);
for (int i = 0; i < strlen(cont); i++)
if (cont[i] == template[0] && cont[i+3] == template[3] && cont[i+6] == template[6])
{
date = malloc(sizeof(char) * temp_len);
memcpy(date, &cont[i], temp_len);
if (isDate(date, temp_len))
{
j += 8;
strcat(dates, date);
}
free(date);
}
dates = realloc(dates, sizeof(char) * j);
return 0;
}
int isDate(char *date_str, int len)
{
int i = 0;
int dd = atoi(&date_str[i+1]);
int mm = atoi(&date_str[i+4]);
int yy = atoi(&date_str[i+7]);
char tmp[5] = {'0'};
memset(date_str, 0, len - 3);
date_str = realloc(date_str, sizeof(char) * (len - 3));
if (dd < 32 && dd > 0 && mm < 13 && mm > 0 && yy > 0)
{
sprintf(tmp, "%04d", yy);
strcat(date_str, tmp);
sprintf(tmp, "%02d", mm);
strcat(date_str, tmp);
sprintf(tmp, "%02d", dd);
strcat(date_str, tmp);
return 1;
}
else return -1;
}
beginner c datetime
the posted code produces MANY warnings when run through the compiler. When compiling, always enable the warnings, then fix those warnings. (forgcc
, at a minimum use:-Wall -Wextra -Wconversion -pedantic -std=gnu11
) Note other compilers use different options to produce the same results
– user3629249
4 hours ago
regarding:char accum[CONT];
this is a mighty large array to be placing on the stack. Suggest moving to 'file' scope (I.E. outside of any function
– user3629249
4 hours ago
OT: regarding:char *dates = malloc(sizeof(char *) * CONT);
when calling any of the heap allocation functions:malloc
calloc
realloc
, always check (!=NULL) the returned value to assure the operation was successful
– user3629249
4 hours ago
in function:getlin()
strongly suggest including braces '{' and '}' around the body of thefor()
statement
– user3629249
3 hours ago
regarding:strcat(accum, line);
the functionstrcat()
searches for a NUL byte, then appends theline
beginning at the NUL byte. However, the posted code does not set the first byte inaccum
to '', so it is unknown where theline
will actually be appended. This is undefined behavior and must be corrected
– user3629249
3 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
The task is find by pattern d--m--y---- all occurrences in text, reformat it to yyyy:mm:dd and print it separately from initial text. Actually I done all except formatting. And even in my written code I have some doubts because I just begun to learn this language. Maybe someone would help me and say what's wrong with my code and how to finish that task on a better way. Any comments are appreciated.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#define MAXLINE 1000
#define CONT 1000000
int getlin(char *, int);
int pickDates(char *, char *);
int isDate(char *, int);
int main()
{
int len;
char line[MAXLINE];
char accum[CONT];
char *dates = malloc(sizeof(char *) * CONT);
while ((len = getlin(line, MAXLINE)) > 0)
strcat(accum, line);
pickDates(dates, accum);
printf("%sn", dates);
free(dates);
return 0;
}
int getlin(char *s, int lim) {
int i, c, j = 0;
for (i = 0; (c = getchar()) != EOF && c != 'n'; ++i)
if (i < lim - 2)
{
s[j] = c;
++j;
}
if (c == 'n')
{
s[j] = c;
++i;
++j;
}
s[j] = '';
return i;
}
int pickDates(char *dates, char *cont)
{
int j = 0;
const char *template = "d--m--y----";
char *date;
int temp_len = strlen(template);
for (int i = 0; i < strlen(cont); i++)
if (cont[i] == template[0] && cont[i+3] == template[3] && cont[i+6] == template[6])
{
date = malloc(sizeof(char) * temp_len);
memcpy(date, &cont[i], temp_len);
if (isDate(date, temp_len))
{
j += 8;
strcat(dates, date);
}
free(date);
}
dates = realloc(dates, sizeof(char) * j);
return 0;
}
int isDate(char *date_str, int len)
{
int i = 0;
int dd = atoi(&date_str[i+1]);
int mm = atoi(&date_str[i+4]);
int yy = atoi(&date_str[i+7]);
char tmp[5] = {'0'};
memset(date_str, 0, len - 3);
date_str = realloc(date_str, sizeof(char) * (len - 3));
if (dd < 32 && dd > 0 && mm < 13 && mm > 0 && yy > 0)
{
sprintf(tmp, "%04d", yy);
strcat(date_str, tmp);
sprintf(tmp, "%02d", mm);
strcat(date_str, tmp);
sprintf(tmp, "%02d", dd);
strcat(date_str, tmp);
return 1;
}
else return -1;
}
beginner c datetime
The task is find by pattern d--m--y---- all occurrences in text, reformat it to yyyy:mm:dd and print it separately from initial text. Actually I done all except formatting. And even in my written code I have some doubts because I just begun to learn this language. Maybe someone would help me and say what's wrong with my code and how to finish that task on a better way. Any comments are appreciated.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#define MAXLINE 1000
#define CONT 1000000
int getlin(char *, int);
int pickDates(char *, char *);
int isDate(char *, int);
int main()
{
int len;
char line[MAXLINE];
char accum[CONT];
char *dates = malloc(sizeof(char *) * CONT);
while ((len = getlin(line, MAXLINE)) > 0)
strcat(accum, line);
pickDates(dates, accum);
printf("%sn", dates);
free(dates);
return 0;
}
int getlin(char *s, int lim) {
int i, c, j = 0;
for (i = 0; (c = getchar()) != EOF && c != 'n'; ++i)
if (i < lim - 2)
{
s[j] = c;
++j;
}
if (c == 'n')
{
s[j] = c;
++i;
++j;
}
s[j] = '';
return i;
}
int pickDates(char *dates, char *cont)
{
int j = 0;
const char *template = "d--m--y----";
char *date;
int temp_len = strlen(template);
for (int i = 0; i < strlen(cont); i++)
if (cont[i] == template[0] && cont[i+3] == template[3] && cont[i+6] == template[6])
{
date = malloc(sizeof(char) * temp_len);
memcpy(date, &cont[i], temp_len);
if (isDate(date, temp_len))
{
j += 8;
strcat(dates, date);
}
free(date);
}
dates = realloc(dates, sizeof(char) * j);
return 0;
}
int isDate(char *date_str, int len)
{
int i = 0;
int dd = atoi(&date_str[i+1]);
int mm = atoi(&date_str[i+4]);
int yy = atoi(&date_str[i+7]);
char tmp[5] = {'0'};
memset(date_str, 0, len - 3);
date_str = realloc(date_str, sizeof(char) * (len - 3));
if (dd < 32 && dd > 0 && mm < 13 && mm > 0 && yy > 0)
{
sprintf(tmp, "%04d", yy);
strcat(date_str, tmp);
sprintf(tmp, "%02d", mm);
strcat(date_str, tmp);
sprintf(tmp, "%02d", dd);
strcat(date_str, tmp);
return 1;
}
else return -1;
}
beginner c datetime
beginner c datetime
edited 15 mins ago
200_success
127k15149412
127k15149412
asked 5 hours ago
Dmitry Khaletskiy
433
433
the posted code produces MANY warnings when run through the compiler. When compiling, always enable the warnings, then fix those warnings. (forgcc
, at a minimum use:-Wall -Wextra -Wconversion -pedantic -std=gnu11
) Note other compilers use different options to produce the same results
– user3629249
4 hours ago
regarding:char accum[CONT];
this is a mighty large array to be placing on the stack. Suggest moving to 'file' scope (I.E. outside of any function
– user3629249
4 hours ago
OT: regarding:char *dates = malloc(sizeof(char *) * CONT);
when calling any of the heap allocation functions:malloc
calloc
realloc
, always check (!=NULL) the returned value to assure the operation was successful
– user3629249
4 hours ago
in function:getlin()
strongly suggest including braces '{' and '}' around the body of thefor()
statement
– user3629249
3 hours ago
regarding:strcat(accum, line);
the functionstrcat()
searches for a NUL byte, then appends theline
beginning at the NUL byte. However, the posted code does not set the first byte inaccum
to '', so it is unknown where theline
will actually be appended. This is undefined behavior and must be corrected
– user3629249
3 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
the posted code produces MANY warnings when run through the compiler. When compiling, always enable the warnings, then fix those warnings. (forgcc
, at a minimum use:-Wall -Wextra -Wconversion -pedantic -std=gnu11
) Note other compilers use different options to produce the same results
– user3629249
4 hours ago
regarding:char accum[CONT];
this is a mighty large array to be placing on the stack. Suggest moving to 'file' scope (I.E. outside of any function
– user3629249
4 hours ago
OT: regarding:char *dates = malloc(sizeof(char *) * CONT);
when calling any of the heap allocation functions:malloc
calloc
realloc
, always check (!=NULL) the returned value to assure the operation was successful
– user3629249
4 hours ago
in function:getlin()
strongly suggest including braces '{' and '}' around the body of thefor()
statement
– user3629249
3 hours ago
regarding:strcat(accum, line);
the functionstrcat()
searches for a NUL byte, then appends theline
beginning at the NUL byte. However, the posted code does not set the first byte inaccum
to '', so it is unknown where theline
will actually be appended. This is undefined behavior and must be corrected
– user3629249
3 hours ago
the posted code produces MANY warnings when run through the compiler. When compiling, always enable the warnings, then fix those warnings. (for
gcc
, at a minimum use: -Wall -Wextra -Wconversion -pedantic -std=gnu11
) Note other compilers use different options to produce the same results– user3629249
4 hours ago
the posted code produces MANY warnings when run through the compiler. When compiling, always enable the warnings, then fix those warnings. (for
gcc
, at a minimum use: -Wall -Wextra -Wconversion -pedantic -std=gnu11
) Note other compilers use different options to produce the same results– user3629249
4 hours ago
regarding:
char accum[CONT];
this is a mighty large array to be placing on the stack. Suggest moving to 'file' scope (I.E. outside of any function– user3629249
4 hours ago
regarding:
char accum[CONT];
this is a mighty large array to be placing on the stack. Suggest moving to 'file' scope (I.E. outside of any function– user3629249
4 hours ago
OT: regarding:
char *dates = malloc(sizeof(char *) * CONT);
when calling any of the heap allocation functions: malloc
calloc
realloc
, always check (!=NULL) the returned value to assure the operation was successful– user3629249
4 hours ago
OT: regarding:
char *dates = malloc(sizeof(char *) * CONT);
when calling any of the heap allocation functions: malloc
calloc
realloc
, always check (!=NULL) the returned value to assure the operation was successful– user3629249
4 hours ago
in function:
getlin()
strongly suggest including braces '{' and '}' around the body of the for()
statement– user3629249
3 hours ago
in function:
getlin()
strongly suggest including braces '{' and '}' around the body of the for()
statement– user3629249
3 hours ago
regarding:
strcat(accum, line);
the function strcat()
searches for a NUL byte, then appends the line
beginning at the NUL byte. However, the posted code does not set the first byte in accum
to '', so it is unknown where the line
will actually be appended. This is undefined behavior and must be corrected– user3629249
3 hours ago
regarding:
strcat(accum, line);
the function strcat()
searches for a NUL byte, then appends the line
beginning at the NUL byte. However, the posted code does not set the first byte in accum
to '', so it is unknown where the line
will actually be appended. This is undefined behavior and must be corrected– user3629249
3 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Whenever declaring a function that you only expect to use in the current file, mark it static
.
The (anonymous) user in the comments above is correct to indicate that accum
is quite large; however, rather than allocating it statically as a global I'd suggest that it be allocated from the heap (malloc
).
printf("%sn", dates)
is equivalent to puts(dates)
, but the latter is more efficient.
Having to predeclare variables in C hasn't been needed since the 90s. Do not predeclare variables. Declare them where they're used; i.e.
for (int i = 0;
That loop doesn't do what you think it does. You're missing braces. The loop will only apply to the first if
.
j += 8
Where does 8
come from? Declare this as a constant. Magic numbers are bad.
It's pointless to have a return value for pickDates
, so make it void
.
date_str
in isDate
should be a const char *
because you shouldn't be modifying it. The same applies to dates
in pickDates
.
Later, where you have a series of sprintf
/ strcat
, do not use strcat
, nor a tmp
array. You can write to date_str
via a temporary pointer that you increment based on the return value of sprintf
.
I suggest inverting this logic:
if (dd < 32 && dd > 0 && mm < 13 && mm > 0 && yy > 0)
{
// ...
return 1;
}
else return -1;
to
if (dd < 0 || dd > 31 || mm < 0 || mm > 12 || yy < 0)
return -1;
// ...
return 1;
Also, if that return value indicates success or failure, you should use a boolean from stdbool.h and use true/false instead of an integer.
This:
int i = 0;
int dd = atoi(&date_str[i+1]);
int mm = atoi(&date_str[i+4]);
int yy = atoi(&date_str[i+7]);
doesn't make a whole lot of sense; i
might as well not exist and you might as well do
int dd = atoi(date_str + 1),
mm = atoi(date_str + 4),
yy = atoi(date_str + 7);
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Whenever declaring a function that you only expect to use in the current file, mark it static
.
The (anonymous) user in the comments above is correct to indicate that accum
is quite large; however, rather than allocating it statically as a global I'd suggest that it be allocated from the heap (malloc
).
printf("%sn", dates)
is equivalent to puts(dates)
, but the latter is more efficient.
Having to predeclare variables in C hasn't been needed since the 90s. Do not predeclare variables. Declare them where they're used; i.e.
for (int i = 0;
That loop doesn't do what you think it does. You're missing braces. The loop will only apply to the first if
.
j += 8
Where does 8
come from? Declare this as a constant. Magic numbers are bad.
It's pointless to have a return value for pickDates
, so make it void
.
date_str
in isDate
should be a const char *
because you shouldn't be modifying it. The same applies to dates
in pickDates
.
Later, where you have a series of sprintf
/ strcat
, do not use strcat
, nor a tmp
array. You can write to date_str
via a temporary pointer that you increment based on the return value of sprintf
.
I suggest inverting this logic:
if (dd < 32 && dd > 0 && mm < 13 && mm > 0 && yy > 0)
{
// ...
return 1;
}
else return -1;
to
if (dd < 0 || dd > 31 || mm < 0 || mm > 12 || yy < 0)
return -1;
// ...
return 1;
Also, if that return value indicates success or failure, you should use a boolean from stdbool.h and use true/false instead of an integer.
This:
int i = 0;
int dd = atoi(&date_str[i+1]);
int mm = atoi(&date_str[i+4]);
int yy = atoi(&date_str[i+7]);
doesn't make a whole lot of sense; i
might as well not exist and you might as well do
int dd = atoi(date_str + 1),
mm = atoi(date_str + 4),
yy = atoi(date_str + 7);
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Whenever declaring a function that you only expect to use in the current file, mark it static
.
The (anonymous) user in the comments above is correct to indicate that accum
is quite large; however, rather than allocating it statically as a global I'd suggest that it be allocated from the heap (malloc
).
printf("%sn", dates)
is equivalent to puts(dates)
, but the latter is more efficient.
Having to predeclare variables in C hasn't been needed since the 90s. Do not predeclare variables. Declare them where they're used; i.e.
for (int i = 0;
That loop doesn't do what you think it does. You're missing braces. The loop will only apply to the first if
.
j += 8
Where does 8
come from? Declare this as a constant. Magic numbers are bad.
It's pointless to have a return value for pickDates
, so make it void
.
date_str
in isDate
should be a const char *
because you shouldn't be modifying it. The same applies to dates
in pickDates
.
Later, where you have a series of sprintf
/ strcat
, do not use strcat
, nor a tmp
array. You can write to date_str
via a temporary pointer that you increment based on the return value of sprintf
.
I suggest inverting this logic:
if (dd < 32 && dd > 0 && mm < 13 && mm > 0 && yy > 0)
{
// ...
return 1;
}
else return -1;
to
if (dd < 0 || dd > 31 || mm < 0 || mm > 12 || yy < 0)
return -1;
// ...
return 1;
Also, if that return value indicates success or failure, you should use a boolean from stdbool.h and use true/false instead of an integer.
This:
int i = 0;
int dd = atoi(&date_str[i+1]);
int mm = atoi(&date_str[i+4]);
int yy = atoi(&date_str[i+7]);
doesn't make a whole lot of sense; i
might as well not exist and you might as well do
int dd = atoi(date_str + 1),
mm = atoi(date_str + 4),
yy = atoi(date_str + 7);
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Whenever declaring a function that you only expect to use in the current file, mark it static
.
The (anonymous) user in the comments above is correct to indicate that accum
is quite large; however, rather than allocating it statically as a global I'd suggest that it be allocated from the heap (malloc
).
printf("%sn", dates)
is equivalent to puts(dates)
, but the latter is more efficient.
Having to predeclare variables in C hasn't been needed since the 90s. Do not predeclare variables. Declare them where they're used; i.e.
for (int i = 0;
That loop doesn't do what you think it does. You're missing braces. The loop will only apply to the first if
.
j += 8
Where does 8
come from? Declare this as a constant. Magic numbers are bad.
It's pointless to have a return value for pickDates
, so make it void
.
date_str
in isDate
should be a const char *
because you shouldn't be modifying it. The same applies to dates
in pickDates
.
Later, where you have a series of sprintf
/ strcat
, do not use strcat
, nor a tmp
array. You can write to date_str
via a temporary pointer that you increment based on the return value of sprintf
.
I suggest inverting this logic:
if (dd < 32 && dd > 0 && mm < 13 && mm > 0 && yy > 0)
{
// ...
return 1;
}
else return -1;
to
if (dd < 0 || dd > 31 || mm < 0 || mm > 12 || yy < 0)
return -1;
// ...
return 1;
Also, if that return value indicates success or failure, you should use a boolean from stdbool.h and use true/false instead of an integer.
This:
int i = 0;
int dd = atoi(&date_str[i+1]);
int mm = atoi(&date_str[i+4]);
int yy = atoi(&date_str[i+7]);
doesn't make a whole lot of sense; i
might as well not exist and you might as well do
int dd = atoi(date_str + 1),
mm = atoi(date_str + 4),
yy = atoi(date_str + 7);
Whenever declaring a function that you only expect to use in the current file, mark it static
.
The (anonymous) user in the comments above is correct to indicate that accum
is quite large; however, rather than allocating it statically as a global I'd suggest that it be allocated from the heap (malloc
).
printf("%sn", dates)
is equivalent to puts(dates)
, but the latter is more efficient.
Having to predeclare variables in C hasn't been needed since the 90s. Do not predeclare variables. Declare them where they're used; i.e.
for (int i = 0;
That loop doesn't do what you think it does. You're missing braces. The loop will only apply to the first if
.
j += 8
Where does 8
come from? Declare this as a constant. Magic numbers are bad.
It's pointless to have a return value for pickDates
, so make it void
.
date_str
in isDate
should be a const char *
because you shouldn't be modifying it. The same applies to dates
in pickDates
.
Later, where you have a series of sprintf
/ strcat
, do not use strcat
, nor a tmp
array. You can write to date_str
via a temporary pointer that you increment based on the return value of sprintf
.
I suggest inverting this logic:
if (dd < 32 && dd > 0 && mm < 13 && mm > 0 && yy > 0)
{
// ...
return 1;
}
else return -1;
to
if (dd < 0 || dd > 31 || mm < 0 || mm > 12 || yy < 0)
return -1;
// ...
return 1;
Also, if that return value indicates success or failure, you should use a boolean from stdbool.h and use true/false instead of an integer.
This:
int i = 0;
int dd = atoi(&date_str[i+1]);
int mm = atoi(&date_str[i+4]);
int yy = atoi(&date_str[i+7]);
doesn't make a whole lot of sense; i
might as well not exist and you might as well do
int dd = atoi(date_str + 1),
mm = atoi(date_str + 4),
yy = atoi(date_str + 7);
answered 2 hours ago
Reinderien
1,622616
1,622616
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f209246%2fextracting-and-reformatting-dates-from-text%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
the posted code produces MANY warnings when run through the compiler. When compiling, always enable the warnings, then fix those warnings. (for
gcc
, at a minimum use:-Wall -Wextra -Wconversion -pedantic -std=gnu11
) Note other compilers use different options to produce the same results– user3629249
4 hours ago
regarding:
char accum[CONT];
this is a mighty large array to be placing on the stack. Suggest moving to 'file' scope (I.E. outside of any function– user3629249
4 hours ago
OT: regarding:
char *dates = malloc(sizeof(char *) * CONT);
when calling any of the heap allocation functions:malloc
calloc
realloc
, always check (!=NULL) the returned value to assure the operation was successful– user3629249
4 hours ago
in function:
getlin()
strongly suggest including braces '{' and '}' around the body of thefor()
statement– user3629249
3 hours ago
regarding:
strcat(accum, line);
the functionstrcat()
searches for a NUL byte, then appends theline
beginning at the NUL byte. However, the posted code does not set the first byte inaccum
to '', so it is unknown where theline
will actually be appended. This is undefined behavior and must be corrected– user3629249
3 hours ago