expressJS: REST routing params conventions incorrectly set?
I am working on a demo project and having a simple but annoying issue with one of my routers.
For the project ids are passed as parameters of the url. The project assign private views to users (routed as /user/:userid/
), common views (eg. routed as /group/:grouid/profile
) and views that are private to user but that would share data with common views in real time (eg. routed as /group/:groupid/:userid/
).
I have currently a simple middleware authorization code to prevent no-registered users to visit group or private user views to see views they are not registered to. A summary of the code is as follows:
authorizationFunctionGroups: function(req, res, next) {
console.log('in middleware authorizationFunctionGroups');
console.log('userid', req.params.userid);
if (!_.isEmpty(registers.groups) && _.get(registers.groups, req.params.groupid)) {
//console.log(registers.groups[req.params.groupid]);
console.log(registers.groups[req.params.groupid]['membersuserid']);
registers.groups[req.params.groupid]['membersuserid'].indexOf(req.params.userid) > -1 ? next() : next(new Error("userid invalid or not in the group"));
} else {
next(new Error('Invalid groupid'));
}
}
However, when I call the group profile router (/group/:grouid/profile
) from some sections of my frontend using the following code:
$('#button1').click(() =>; window.location = '.../group/' + url.pathname.split('/').slice(-2)[0] + '/profile');
the routers get confused, passing my call through the authorization middleware and triggers an error ("userid invalid or not in the group").
The call gets rejected because when the frontend method passes the call to the backend, my routing convention gets stuck as it doesn't recognise the second parameter of that call ("profile") as a user.
The hack I found to solve this is to change my current router /group/:groupid/profile
into /group/:groupid/profile/profile
, which I dont like.
I have to substitute the above code for:
Middleware
authorizationFunctionGroups: function(req, res, next) {
console.log('in middleware authorizationFunctionGroups');
console.log('userid', req.params.userid);
if (req.params.userid == 'profile') { ///?????????
res.redirect('/group/' + req.params.groupid + '/profile/profile');
} else if (!_.isEmpty(registers.groups) && _.get(registers.groups, req.params.groupid)) {
//console.log(registers.groups[req.params.groupid]);
console.log(registers.groups[req.params.groupid]['membersuserid']);
registers.groups[req.params.groupid]['membersuserid'].indexOf(req.params.userid) > -1 ? next() : next(new Error("userid invalid or not in the group"));
} else {
next(new Error('Invalid groupid'));
}
},
Frontend
$('#button1').click(() =>; window.location = '.../group/' + url.pathname.split('/').slice(-2)[0] + '/profile/profile');
Two Questions
It is clearly that my main problem is a conventional one. Any advice/resources on how to order/name my routers?
I am trying to keep a single view for everyone (group/:groupid/profile) instead of creating individual views with same data. However: is this a common best practice in the industry? If not, what is more appropriate?
Thanks in advance for your comments.
rest express
add a comment |
I am working on a demo project and having a simple but annoying issue with one of my routers.
For the project ids are passed as parameters of the url. The project assign private views to users (routed as /user/:userid/
), common views (eg. routed as /group/:grouid/profile
) and views that are private to user but that would share data with common views in real time (eg. routed as /group/:groupid/:userid/
).
I have currently a simple middleware authorization code to prevent no-registered users to visit group or private user views to see views they are not registered to. A summary of the code is as follows:
authorizationFunctionGroups: function(req, res, next) {
console.log('in middleware authorizationFunctionGroups');
console.log('userid', req.params.userid);
if (!_.isEmpty(registers.groups) && _.get(registers.groups, req.params.groupid)) {
//console.log(registers.groups[req.params.groupid]);
console.log(registers.groups[req.params.groupid]['membersuserid']);
registers.groups[req.params.groupid]['membersuserid'].indexOf(req.params.userid) > -1 ? next() : next(new Error("userid invalid or not in the group"));
} else {
next(new Error('Invalid groupid'));
}
}
However, when I call the group profile router (/group/:grouid/profile
) from some sections of my frontend using the following code:
$('#button1').click(() =>; window.location = '.../group/' + url.pathname.split('/').slice(-2)[0] + '/profile');
the routers get confused, passing my call through the authorization middleware and triggers an error ("userid invalid or not in the group").
The call gets rejected because when the frontend method passes the call to the backend, my routing convention gets stuck as it doesn't recognise the second parameter of that call ("profile") as a user.
The hack I found to solve this is to change my current router /group/:groupid/profile
into /group/:groupid/profile/profile
, which I dont like.
I have to substitute the above code for:
Middleware
authorizationFunctionGroups: function(req, res, next) {
console.log('in middleware authorizationFunctionGroups');
console.log('userid', req.params.userid);
if (req.params.userid == 'profile') { ///?????????
res.redirect('/group/' + req.params.groupid + '/profile/profile');
} else if (!_.isEmpty(registers.groups) && _.get(registers.groups, req.params.groupid)) {
//console.log(registers.groups[req.params.groupid]);
console.log(registers.groups[req.params.groupid]['membersuserid']);
registers.groups[req.params.groupid]['membersuserid'].indexOf(req.params.userid) > -1 ? next() : next(new Error("userid invalid or not in the group"));
} else {
next(new Error('Invalid groupid'));
}
},
Frontend
$('#button1').click(() =>; window.location = '.../group/' + url.pathname.split('/').slice(-2)[0] + '/profile/profile');
Two Questions
It is clearly that my main problem is a conventional one. Any advice/resources on how to order/name my routers?
I am trying to keep a single view for everyone (group/:groupid/profile) instead of creating individual views with same data. However: is this a common best practice in the industry? If not, what is more appropriate?
Thanks in advance for your comments.
rest express
add a comment |
I am working on a demo project and having a simple but annoying issue with one of my routers.
For the project ids are passed as parameters of the url. The project assign private views to users (routed as /user/:userid/
), common views (eg. routed as /group/:grouid/profile
) and views that are private to user but that would share data with common views in real time (eg. routed as /group/:groupid/:userid/
).
I have currently a simple middleware authorization code to prevent no-registered users to visit group or private user views to see views they are not registered to. A summary of the code is as follows:
authorizationFunctionGroups: function(req, res, next) {
console.log('in middleware authorizationFunctionGroups');
console.log('userid', req.params.userid);
if (!_.isEmpty(registers.groups) && _.get(registers.groups, req.params.groupid)) {
//console.log(registers.groups[req.params.groupid]);
console.log(registers.groups[req.params.groupid]['membersuserid']);
registers.groups[req.params.groupid]['membersuserid'].indexOf(req.params.userid) > -1 ? next() : next(new Error("userid invalid or not in the group"));
} else {
next(new Error('Invalid groupid'));
}
}
However, when I call the group profile router (/group/:grouid/profile
) from some sections of my frontend using the following code:
$('#button1').click(() =>; window.location = '.../group/' + url.pathname.split('/').slice(-2)[0] + '/profile');
the routers get confused, passing my call through the authorization middleware and triggers an error ("userid invalid or not in the group").
The call gets rejected because when the frontend method passes the call to the backend, my routing convention gets stuck as it doesn't recognise the second parameter of that call ("profile") as a user.
The hack I found to solve this is to change my current router /group/:groupid/profile
into /group/:groupid/profile/profile
, which I dont like.
I have to substitute the above code for:
Middleware
authorizationFunctionGroups: function(req, res, next) {
console.log('in middleware authorizationFunctionGroups');
console.log('userid', req.params.userid);
if (req.params.userid == 'profile') { ///?????????
res.redirect('/group/' + req.params.groupid + '/profile/profile');
} else if (!_.isEmpty(registers.groups) && _.get(registers.groups, req.params.groupid)) {
//console.log(registers.groups[req.params.groupid]);
console.log(registers.groups[req.params.groupid]['membersuserid']);
registers.groups[req.params.groupid]['membersuserid'].indexOf(req.params.userid) > -1 ? next() : next(new Error("userid invalid or not in the group"));
} else {
next(new Error('Invalid groupid'));
}
},
Frontend
$('#button1').click(() =>; window.location = '.../group/' + url.pathname.split('/').slice(-2)[0] + '/profile/profile');
Two Questions
It is clearly that my main problem is a conventional one. Any advice/resources on how to order/name my routers?
I am trying to keep a single view for everyone (group/:groupid/profile) instead of creating individual views with same data. However: is this a common best practice in the industry? If not, what is more appropriate?
Thanks in advance for your comments.
rest express
I am working on a demo project and having a simple but annoying issue with one of my routers.
For the project ids are passed as parameters of the url. The project assign private views to users (routed as /user/:userid/
), common views (eg. routed as /group/:grouid/profile
) and views that are private to user but that would share data with common views in real time (eg. routed as /group/:groupid/:userid/
).
I have currently a simple middleware authorization code to prevent no-registered users to visit group or private user views to see views they are not registered to. A summary of the code is as follows:
authorizationFunctionGroups: function(req, res, next) {
console.log('in middleware authorizationFunctionGroups');
console.log('userid', req.params.userid);
if (!_.isEmpty(registers.groups) && _.get(registers.groups, req.params.groupid)) {
//console.log(registers.groups[req.params.groupid]);
console.log(registers.groups[req.params.groupid]['membersuserid']);
registers.groups[req.params.groupid]['membersuserid'].indexOf(req.params.userid) > -1 ? next() : next(new Error("userid invalid or not in the group"));
} else {
next(new Error('Invalid groupid'));
}
}
However, when I call the group profile router (/group/:grouid/profile
) from some sections of my frontend using the following code:
$('#button1').click(() =>; window.location = '.../group/' + url.pathname.split('/').slice(-2)[0] + '/profile');
the routers get confused, passing my call through the authorization middleware and triggers an error ("userid invalid or not in the group").
The call gets rejected because when the frontend method passes the call to the backend, my routing convention gets stuck as it doesn't recognise the second parameter of that call ("profile") as a user.
The hack I found to solve this is to change my current router /group/:groupid/profile
into /group/:groupid/profile/profile
, which I dont like.
I have to substitute the above code for:
Middleware
authorizationFunctionGroups: function(req, res, next) {
console.log('in middleware authorizationFunctionGroups');
console.log('userid', req.params.userid);
if (req.params.userid == 'profile') { ///?????????
res.redirect('/group/' + req.params.groupid + '/profile/profile');
} else if (!_.isEmpty(registers.groups) && _.get(registers.groups, req.params.groupid)) {
//console.log(registers.groups[req.params.groupid]);
console.log(registers.groups[req.params.groupid]['membersuserid']);
registers.groups[req.params.groupid]['membersuserid'].indexOf(req.params.userid) > -1 ? next() : next(new Error("userid invalid or not in the group"));
} else {
next(new Error('Invalid groupid'));
}
},
Frontend
$('#button1').click(() =>; window.location = '.../group/' + url.pathname.split('/').slice(-2)[0] + '/profile/profile');
Two Questions
It is clearly that my main problem is a conventional one. Any advice/resources on how to order/name my routers?
I am trying to keep a single view for everyone (group/:groupid/profile) instead of creating individual views with same data. However: is this a common best practice in the industry? If not, what is more appropriate?
Thanks in advance for your comments.
rest express
rest express
asked Nov 22 '18 at 21:17
user3675901user3675901
13
13
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53438075%2fexpressjs-rest-routing-params-conventions-incorrectly-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53438075%2fexpressjs-rest-routing-params-conventions-incorrectly-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown