What is “function*” in JavaScript?












223















In this page I found a new JavaScript function type:



// NOTE: "function*" is not supported yet in Firefox.
// Remove the asterisk in order for this code to work in Firefox 13

function* fibonacci() { // !!! this is the interesting line !!!
let [prev, curr] = [0, 1];
for (;;) {
[prev, curr] = [curr, prev + curr];
yield curr;
}
}


I already know what yield, let and [?,?]=[?,?] do, but have no idea what the function* is meant to be. What is it?



P.S. don't bother trying Google, it's impossible to search for expressions with asterisks (they're used as placeholders).










share|improve this question




















  • 4





    The comment in the example is quite old now, function* syntax is supported in Firefox since v26: developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…* . Older versions used a different syntax.

    – Nickolay
    Sep 9 '14 at 22:16






  • 33





    Regarding Google, just search for "function star" or "function asterisk". That's how I found this question ;).

    – trysis
    Feb 2 '15 at 22:05






  • 2





    Looks like the * was stripped from the link from @Nickolay. Here's a link directly to function* at MDN. Sure enough, "basic" support since v26.

    – ruffin
    Apr 29 '15 at 17:16













  • Another MDN link (which, by the way, I found on the MDN page linked by OP): developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…

    – BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
    Dec 1 '15 at 17:20











  • Another useful MDN link: developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…*

    – Logan
    Jun 23 '17 at 5:46
















223















In this page I found a new JavaScript function type:



// NOTE: "function*" is not supported yet in Firefox.
// Remove the asterisk in order for this code to work in Firefox 13

function* fibonacci() { // !!! this is the interesting line !!!
let [prev, curr] = [0, 1];
for (;;) {
[prev, curr] = [curr, prev + curr];
yield curr;
}
}


I already know what yield, let and [?,?]=[?,?] do, but have no idea what the function* is meant to be. What is it?



P.S. don't bother trying Google, it's impossible to search for expressions with asterisks (they're used as placeholders).










share|improve this question




















  • 4





    The comment in the example is quite old now, function* syntax is supported in Firefox since v26: developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…* . Older versions used a different syntax.

    – Nickolay
    Sep 9 '14 at 22:16






  • 33





    Regarding Google, just search for "function star" or "function asterisk". That's how I found this question ;).

    – trysis
    Feb 2 '15 at 22:05






  • 2





    Looks like the * was stripped from the link from @Nickolay. Here's a link directly to function* at MDN. Sure enough, "basic" support since v26.

    – ruffin
    Apr 29 '15 at 17:16













  • Another MDN link (which, by the way, I found on the MDN page linked by OP): developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…

    – BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
    Dec 1 '15 at 17:20











  • Another useful MDN link: developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…*

    – Logan
    Jun 23 '17 at 5:46














223












223








223


63






In this page I found a new JavaScript function type:



// NOTE: "function*" is not supported yet in Firefox.
// Remove the asterisk in order for this code to work in Firefox 13

function* fibonacci() { // !!! this is the interesting line !!!
let [prev, curr] = [0, 1];
for (;;) {
[prev, curr] = [curr, prev + curr];
yield curr;
}
}


I already know what yield, let and [?,?]=[?,?] do, but have no idea what the function* is meant to be. What is it?



P.S. don't bother trying Google, it's impossible to search for expressions with asterisks (they're used as placeholders).










share|improve this question
















In this page I found a new JavaScript function type:



// NOTE: "function*" is not supported yet in Firefox.
// Remove the asterisk in order for this code to work in Firefox 13

function* fibonacci() { // !!! this is the interesting line !!!
let [prev, curr] = [0, 1];
for (;;) {
[prev, curr] = [curr, prev + curr];
yield curr;
}
}


I already know what yield, let and [?,?]=[?,?] do, but have no idea what the function* is meant to be. What is it?



P.S. don't bother trying Google, it's impossible to search for expressions with asterisks (they're used as placeholders).







javascript function ecmascript-6






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 25 '14 at 6:00









thefourtheye

166k27300378




166k27300378










asked Mar 8 '12 at 15:53









string QNAstring QNA

1,36531112




1,36531112








  • 4





    The comment in the example is quite old now, function* syntax is supported in Firefox since v26: developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…* . Older versions used a different syntax.

    – Nickolay
    Sep 9 '14 at 22:16






  • 33





    Regarding Google, just search for "function star" or "function asterisk". That's how I found this question ;).

    – trysis
    Feb 2 '15 at 22:05






  • 2





    Looks like the * was stripped from the link from @Nickolay. Here's a link directly to function* at MDN. Sure enough, "basic" support since v26.

    – ruffin
    Apr 29 '15 at 17:16













  • Another MDN link (which, by the way, I found on the MDN page linked by OP): developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…

    – BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
    Dec 1 '15 at 17:20











  • Another useful MDN link: developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…*

    – Logan
    Jun 23 '17 at 5:46














  • 4





    The comment in the example is quite old now, function* syntax is supported in Firefox since v26: developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…* . Older versions used a different syntax.

    – Nickolay
    Sep 9 '14 at 22:16






  • 33





    Regarding Google, just search for "function star" or "function asterisk". That's how I found this question ;).

    – trysis
    Feb 2 '15 at 22:05






  • 2





    Looks like the * was stripped from the link from @Nickolay. Here's a link directly to function* at MDN. Sure enough, "basic" support since v26.

    – ruffin
    Apr 29 '15 at 17:16













  • Another MDN link (which, by the way, I found on the MDN page linked by OP): developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…

    – BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
    Dec 1 '15 at 17:20











  • Another useful MDN link: developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…*

    – Logan
    Jun 23 '17 at 5:46








4




4





The comment in the example is quite old now, function* syntax is supported in Firefox since v26: developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…* . Older versions used a different syntax.

– Nickolay
Sep 9 '14 at 22:16





The comment in the example is quite old now, function* syntax is supported in Firefox since v26: developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…* . Older versions used a different syntax.

– Nickolay
Sep 9 '14 at 22:16




33




33





Regarding Google, just search for "function star" or "function asterisk". That's how I found this question ;).

– trysis
Feb 2 '15 at 22:05





Regarding Google, just search for "function star" or "function asterisk". That's how I found this question ;).

– trysis
Feb 2 '15 at 22:05




2




2





Looks like the * was stripped from the link from @Nickolay. Here's a link directly to function* at MDN. Sure enough, "basic" support since v26.

– ruffin
Apr 29 '15 at 17:16







Looks like the * was stripped from the link from @Nickolay. Here's a link directly to function* at MDN. Sure enough, "basic" support since v26.

– ruffin
Apr 29 '15 at 17:16















Another MDN link (which, by the way, I found on the MDN page linked by OP): developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…

– BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
Dec 1 '15 at 17:20





Another MDN link (which, by the way, I found on the MDN page linked by OP): developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…

– BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
Dec 1 '15 at 17:20













Another useful MDN link: developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…*

– Logan
Jun 23 '17 at 5:46





Another useful MDN link: developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…*

– Logan
Jun 23 '17 at 5:46












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















180














It's a Generator function.




Generators are functions which can be exited and later re-entered. Their context (variable bindings) will be saved across re-entrances.



Calling a generator function does not execute its body immediately; an iterator object for the function is returned instead. When the iterator's next() method is called, the generator function's body is executed until the first yield expression, which specifies the value to be returned from the iterator or, with yield*, delegates to another generator function.






Historical note:



It's a proposed syntax for EcmaScript.next.



Dave Herman of Mozilla gave a talk about EcmaScript.next. At 30:15 he talks about generators.



Earlier, he explains how Mozilla is experimentally implementing proposed language changes to help steer the committee. Dave works closely with Brendan Eich, Mozilla's CTO (I think), and the original JavaScript designer.



You can find more detail on the EcmaScript working group wiki: http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:generators



The working group (TC-39) has general agreement that EcmaScript.next should have some kind of generator iterator proposal, but this is not final.



You shouldn't rely on this showing up without changes in the next version of the language, and even if it doesn't change, it probably won't show up widely in other browsers for a while.




Overview



First-class coroutines, represented as objects encapsulating suspended execution contexts (i.e., function activations). Prior art: Python, Icon, Lua, Scheme, Smalltalk.



Examples



The “infinite” sequence of Fibonacci numbers (notwithstanding behavior around 253):



function* fibonacci() {
let [prev, curr] = [0, 1];
for (;;) {
[prev, curr] = [curr, prev + curr];
yield curr;
}
}


Generators can be iterated over in loops:



for (n of fibonacci()) {
// truncate the sequence at 1000
if (n > 1000)
break;
print(n);
}


Generators are iterators:



let seq = fibonacci();
print(seq.next()); // 1
print(seq.next()); // 2
print(seq.next()); // 3
print(seq.next()); // 5
print(seq.next()); // 8






share|improve this answer





















  • 7





    Follow up: what does a for loop with no parameters (for(;;)) do? Why use it in this context?

    – Fergie
    Aug 28 '13 at 7:22






  • 13





    @Fergie, for(;;) is the same as while (true). It's used in this context since the Fibonacci sequence is an unbounded sequence.

    – Mike Samuel
    Aug 28 '13 at 7:37






  • 5





    Prior art: C# yield?

    – Dave Van den Eynde
    Dec 19 '14 at 13:09






  • 3





    @DaveVandenEynde, prior prior art: Python yield. Prior prior prior art: CLU and Icon.

    – Mike Samuel
    Dec 19 '14 at 17:06



















50














It's a generator function - and it said so in the page you cite, in the comment you replaced with "this is the interesting line"...



Basically it's a way to specify sequences programmatically so that they can be passed around and elements accessed by index without having to compute the entire sequence (possibly infinite in size) beforehand.






share|improve this answer



















  • 9





    "accessed by index without having to compute the entire sequence" is possibly the most helpful bit of explanation about generators I've come across so far. I could see using this in an app, vs previously just understanding it theoretically.

    – wes
    Aug 6 '15 at 16:17



















11














The function* type looks like it acts as a generator function for processes that can be iterated.
C# has a feature like this using "yield return" see 1 and see 2



Essentially this returns each value one by one to whatever is iterating this function, which is why their use case shows it in a foreach style loop.






share|improve this answer

























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f9620586%2fwhat-is-function-in-javascript%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    180














    It's a Generator function.




    Generators are functions which can be exited and later re-entered. Their context (variable bindings) will be saved across re-entrances.



    Calling a generator function does not execute its body immediately; an iterator object for the function is returned instead. When the iterator's next() method is called, the generator function's body is executed until the first yield expression, which specifies the value to be returned from the iterator or, with yield*, delegates to another generator function.






    Historical note:



    It's a proposed syntax for EcmaScript.next.



    Dave Herman of Mozilla gave a talk about EcmaScript.next. At 30:15 he talks about generators.



    Earlier, he explains how Mozilla is experimentally implementing proposed language changes to help steer the committee. Dave works closely with Brendan Eich, Mozilla's CTO (I think), and the original JavaScript designer.



    You can find more detail on the EcmaScript working group wiki: http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:generators



    The working group (TC-39) has general agreement that EcmaScript.next should have some kind of generator iterator proposal, but this is not final.



    You shouldn't rely on this showing up without changes in the next version of the language, and even if it doesn't change, it probably won't show up widely in other browsers for a while.




    Overview



    First-class coroutines, represented as objects encapsulating suspended execution contexts (i.e., function activations). Prior art: Python, Icon, Lua, Scheme, Smalltalk.



    Examples



    The “infinite” sequence of Fibonacci numbers (notwithstanding behavior around 253):



    function* fibonacci() {
    let [prev, curr] = [0, 1];
    for (;;) {
    [prev, curr] = [curr, prev + curr];
    yield curr;
    }
    }


    Generators can be iterated over in loops:



    for (n of fibonacci()) {
    // truncate the sequence at 1000
    if (n > 1000)
    break;
    print(n);
    }


    Generators are iterators:



    let seq = fibonacci();
    print(seq.next()); // 1
    print(seq.next()); // 2
    print(seq.next()); // 3
    print(seq.next()); // 5
    print(seq.next()); // 8






    share|improve this answer





















    • 7





      Follow up: what does a for loop with no parameters (for(;;)) do? Why use it in this context?

      – Fergie
      Aug 28 '13 at 7:22






    • 13





      @Fergie, for(;;) is the same as while (true). It's used in this context since the Fibonacci sequence is an unbounded sequence.

      – Mike Samuel
      Aug 28 '13 at 7:37






    • 5





      Prior art: C# yield?

      – Dave Van den Eynde
      Dec 19 '14 at 13:09






    • 3





      @DaveVandenEynde, prior prior art: Python yield. Prior prior prior art: CLU and Icon.

      – Mike Samuel
      Dec 19 '14 at 17:06
















    180














    It's a Generator function.




    Generators are functions which can be exited and later re-entered. Their context (variable bindings) will be saved across re-entrances.



    Calling a generator function does not execute its body immediately; an iterator object for the function is returned instead. When the iterator's next() method is called, the generator function's body is executed until the first yield expression, which specifies the value to be returned from the iterator or, with yield*, delegates to another generator function.






    Historical note:



    It's a proposed syntax for EcmaScript.next.



    Dave Herman of Mozilla gave a talk about EcmaScript.next. At 30:15 he talks about generators.



    Earlier, he explains how Mozilla is experimentally implementing proposed language changes to help steer the committee. Dave works closely with Brendan Eich, Mozilla's CTO (I think), and the original JavaScript designer.



    You can find more detail on the EcmaScript working group wiki: http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:generators



    The working group (TC-39) has general agreement that EcmaScript.next should have some kind of generator iterator proposal, but this is not final.



    You shouldn't rely on this showing up without changes in the next version of the language, and even if it doesn't change, it probably won't show up widely in other browsers for a while.




    Overview



    First-class coroutines, represented as objects encapsulating suspended execution contexts (i.e., function activations). Prior art: Python, Icon, Lua, Scheme, Smalltalk.



    Examples



    The “infinite” sequence of Fibonacci numbers (notwithstanding behavior around 253):



    function* fibonacci() {
    let [prev, curr] = [0, 1];
    for (;;) {
    [prev, curr] = [curr, prev + curr];
    yield curr;
    }
    }


    Generators can be iterated over in loops:



    for (n of fibonacci()) {
    // truncate the sequence at 1000
    if (n > 1000)
    break;
    print(n);
    }


    Generators are iterators:



    let seq = fibonacci();
    print(seq.next()); // 1
    print(seq.next()); // 2
    print(seq.next()); // 3
    print(seq.next()); // 5
    print(seq.next()); // 8






    share|improve this answer





















    • 7





      Follow up: what does a for loop with no parameters (for(;;)) do? Why use it in this context?

      – Fergie
      Aug 28 '13 at 7:22






    • 13





      @Fergie, for(;;) is the same as while (true). It's used in this context since the Fibonacci sequence is an unbounded sequence.

      – Mike Samuel
      Aug 28 '13 at 7:37






    • 5





      Prior art: C# yield?

      – Dave Van den Eynde
      Dec 19 '14 at 13:09






    • 3





      @DaveVandenEynde, prior prior art: Python yield. Prior prior prior art: CLU and Icon.

      – Mike Samuel
      Dec 19 '14 at 17:06














    180












    180








    180







    It's a Generator function.




    Generators are functions which can be exited and later re-entered. Their context (variable bindings) will be saved across re-entrances.



    Calling a generator function does not execute its body immediately; an iterator object for the function is returned instead. When the iterator's next() method is called, the generator function's body is executed until the first yield expression, which specifies the value to be returned from the iterator or, with yield*, delegates to another generator function.






    Historical note:



    It's a proposed syntax for EcmaScript.next.



    Dave Herman of Mozilla gave a talk about EcmaScript.next. At 30:15 he talks about generators.



    Earlier, he explains how Mozilla is experimentally implementing proposed language changes to help steer the committee. Dave works closely with Brendan Eich, Mozilla's CTO (I think), and the original JavaScript designer.



    You can find more detail on the EcmaScript working group wiki: http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:generators



    The working group (TC-39) has general agreement that EcmaScript.next should have some kind of generator iterator proposal, but this is not final.



    You shouldn't rely on this showing up without changes in the next version of the language, and even if it doesn't change, it probably won't show up widely in other browsers for a while.




    Overview



    First-class coroutines, represented as objects encapsulating suspended execution contexts (i.e., function activations). Prior art: Python, Icon, Lua, Scheme, Smalltalk.



    Examples



    The “infinite” sequence of Fibonacci numbers (notwithstanding behavior around 253):



    function* fibonacci() {
    let [prev, curr] = [0, 1];
    for (;;) {
    [prev, curr] = [curr, prev + curr];
    yield curr;
    }
    }


    Generators can be iterated over in loops:



    for (n of fibonacci()) {
    // truncate the sequence at 1000
    if (n > 1000)
    break;
    print(n);
    }


    Generators are iterators:



    let seq = fibonacci();
    print(seq.next()); // 1
    print(seq.next()); // 2
    print(seq.next()); // 3
    print(seq.next()); // 5
    print(seq.next()); // 8






    share|improve this answer















    It's a Generator function.




    Generators are functions which can be exited and later re-entered. Their context (variable bindings) will be saved across re-entrances.



    Calling a generator function does not execute its body immediately; an iterator object for the function is returned instead. When the iterator's next() method is called, the generator function's body is executed until the first yield expression, which specifies the value to be returned from the iterator or, with yield*, delegates to another generator function.






    Historical note:



    It's a proposed syntax for EcmaScript.next.



    Dave Herman of Mozilla gave a talk about EcmaScript.next. At 30:15 he talks about generators.



    Earlier, he explains how Mozilla is experimentally implementing proposed language changes to help steer the committee. Dave works closely with Brendan Eich, Mozilla's CTO (I think), and the original JavaScript designer.



    You can find more detail on the EcmaScript working group wiki: http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:generators



    The working group (TC-39) has general agreement that EcmaScript.next should have some kind of generator iterator proposal, but this is not final.



    You shouldn't rely on this showing up without changes in the next version of the language, and even if it doesn't change, it probably won't show up widely in other browsers for a while.




    Overview



    First-class coroutines, represented as objects encapsulating suspended execution contexts (i.e., function activations). Prior art: Python, Icon, Lua, Scheme, Smalltalk.



    Examples



    The “infinite” sequence of Fibonacci numbers (notwithstanding behavior around 253):



    function* fibonacci() {
    let [prev, curr] = [0, 1];
    for (;;) {
    [prev, curr] = [curr, prev + curr];
    yield curr;
    }
    }


    Generators can be iterated over in loops:



    for (n of fibonacci()) {
    // truncate the sequence at 1000
    if (n > 1000)
    break;
    print(n);
    }


    Generators are iterators:



    let seq = fibonacci();
    print(seq.next()); // 1
    print(seq.next()); // 2
    print(seq.next()); // 3
    print(seq.next()); // 5
    print(seq.next()); // 8







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Jul 11 '18 at 13:36

























    answered Mar 8 '12 at 16:02









    Mike SamuelMike Samuel

    94.1k23174215




    94.1k23174215








    • 7





      Follow up: what does a for loop with no parameters (for(;;)) do? Why use it in this context?

      – Fergie
      Aug 28 '13 at 7:22






    • 13





      @Fergie, for(;;) is the same as while (true). It's used in this context since the Fibonacci sequence is an unbounded sequence.

      – Mike Samuel
      Aug 28 '13 at 7:37






    • 5





      Prior art: C# yield?

      – Dave Van den Eynde
      Dec 19 '14 at 13:09






    • 3





      @DaveVandenEynde, prior prior art: Python yield. Prior prior prior art: CLU and Icon.

      – Mike Samuel
      Dec 19 '14 at 17:06














    • 7





      Follow up: what does a for loop with no parameters (for(;;)) do? Why use it in this context?

      – Fergie
      Aug 28 '13 at 7:22






    • 13





      @Fergie, for(;;) is the same as while (true). It's used in this context since the Fibonacci sequence is an unbounded sequence.

      – Mike Samuel
      Aug 28 '13 at 7:37






    • 5





      Prior art: C# yield?

      – Dave Van den Eynde
      Dec 19 '14 at 13:09






    • 3





      @DaveVandenEynde, prior prior art: Python yield. Prior prior prior art: CLU and Icon.

      – Mike Samuel
      Dec 19 '14 at 17:06








    7




    7





    Follow up: what does a for loop with no parameters (for(;;)) do? Why use it in this context?

    – Fergie
    Aug 28 '13 at 7:22





    Follow up: what does a for loop with no parameters (for(;;)) do? Why use it in this context?

    – Fergie
    Aug 28 '13 at 7:22




    13




    13





    @Fergie, for(;;) is the same as while (true). It's used in this context since the Fibonacci sequence is an unbounded sequence.

    – Mike Samuel
    Aug 28 '13 at 7:37





    @Fergie, for(;;) is the same as while (true). It's used in this context since the Fibonacci sequence is an unbounded sequence.

    – Mike Samuel
    Aug 28 '13 at 7:37




    5




    5





    Prior art: C# yield?

    – Dave Van den Eynde
    Dec 19 '14 at 13:09





    Prior art: C# yield?

    – Dave Van den Eynde
    Dec 19 '14 at 13:09




    3




    3





    @DaveVandenEynde, prior prior art: Python yield. Prior prior prior art: CLU and Icon.

    – Mike Samuel
    Dec 19 '14 at 17:06





    @DaveVandenEynde, prior prior art: Python yield. Prior prior prior art: CLU and Icon.

    – Mike Samuel
    Dec 19 '14 at 17:06













    50














    It's a generator function - and it said so in the page you cite, in the comment you replaced with "this is the interesting line"...



    Basically it's a way to specify sequences programmatically so that they can be passed around and elements accessed by index without having to compute the entire sequence (possibly infinite in size) beforehand.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 9





      "accessed by index without having to compute the entire sequence" is possibly the most helpful bit of explanation about generators I've come across so far. I could see using this in an app, vs previously just understanding it theoretically.

      – wes
      Aug 6 '15 at 16:17
















    50














    It's a generator function - and it said so in the page you cite, in the comment you replaced with "this is the interesting line"...



    Basically it's a way to specify sequences programmatically so that they can be passed around and elements accessed by index without having to compute the entire sequence (possibly infinite in size) beforehand.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 9





      "accessed by index without having to compute the entire sequence" is possibly the most helpful bit of explanation about generators I've come across so far. I could see using this in an app, vs previously just understanding it theoretically.

      – wes
      Aug 6 '15 at 16:17














    50












    50








    50







    It's a generator function - and it said so in the page you cite, in the comment you replaced with "this is the interesting line"...



    Basically it's a way to specify sequences programmatically so that they can be passed around and elements accessed by index without having to compute the entire sequence (possibly infinite in size) beforehand.






    share|improve this answer













    It's a generator function - and it said so in the page you cite, in the comment you replaced with "this is the interesting line"...



    Basically it's a way to specify sequences programmatically so that they can be passed around and elements accessed by index without having to compute the entire sequence (possibly infinite in size) beforehand.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Mar 8 '12 at 16:08









    Michael BorgwardtMichael Borgwardt

    297k64429668




    297k64429668








    • 9





      "accessed by index without having to compute the entire sequence" is possibly the most helpful bit of explanation about generators I've come across so far. I could see using this in an app, vs previously just understanding it theoretically.

      – wes
      Aug 6 '15 at 16:17














    • 9





      "accessed by index without having to compute the entire sequence" is possibly the most helpful bit of explanation about generators I've come across so far. I could see using this in an app, vs previously just understanding it theoretically.

      – wes
      Aug 6 '15 at 16:17








    9




    9





    "accessed by index without having to compute the entire sequence" is possibly the most helpful bit of explanation about generators I've come across so far. I could see using this in an app, vs previously just understanding it theoretically.

    – wes
    Aug 6 '15 at 16:17





    "accessed by index without having to compute the entire sequence" is possibly the most helpful bit of explanation about generators I've come across so far. I could see using this in an app, vs previously just understanding it theoretically.

    – wes
    Aug 6 '15 at 16:17











    11














    The function* type looks like it acts as a generator function for processes that can be iterated.
    C# has a feature like this using "yield return" see 1 and see 2



    Essentially this returns each value one by one to whatever is iterating this function, which is why their use case shows it in a foreach style loop.






    share|improve this answer






























      11














      The function* type looks like it acts as a generator function for processes that can be iterated.
      C# has a feature like this using "yield return" see 1 and see 2



      Essentially this returns each value one by one to whatever is iterating this function, which is why their use case shows it in a foreach style loop.






      share|improve this answer




























        11












        11








        11







        The function* type looks like it acts as a generator function for processes that can be iterated.
        C# has a feature like this using "yield return" see 1 and see 2



        Essentially this returns each value one by one to whatever is iterating this function, which is why their use case shows it in a foreach style loop.






        share|improve this answer















        The function* type looks like it acts as a generator function for processes that can be iterated.
        C# has a feature like this using "yield return" see 1 and see 2



        Essentially this returns each value one by one to whatever is iterating this function, which is why their use case shows it in a foreach style loop.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited May 23 '17 at 11:47









        Community

        11




        11










        answered Mar 8 '12 at 16:04









        invalidsyntaxinvalidsyntax

        6261513




        6261513






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f9620586%2fwhat-is-function-in-javascript%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Costa Masnaga

            Fotorealismo

            Sidney Franklin