Better way then having multiple elif statement











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have a file called file.txt which has some random numbers from 1 to 100. So a script reads the file and executes a bunch of commands and print some statements.



One way of achieving the result could be something like these but having 100 if and elif statement in a script doesn't look so nice.



for i in `cat file.txt`; do
echo "Displaying" $i
if [[ $i = 1 ]]; then
echo "blah blah blah for" $i
command1
command2
elif [[ $i = 2 ]]; then
echo "blah blah blah for" $i
command3
command4
command5
elif [[ $i = 3 ]]; then
echo "blah blah blah for" $i
command6
command7
elif [[ $i = 4 ]]; then
echo "blah blah blah for" $i
command8
command9
command10
elif [[ $i = 5 ]]; then
echo "blah blah blah for" $i
command11
command12
command13
command14
elif [[ $i = 6 ]]; then
echo "blah blah blah for" $i
command15

....
....
....
....
....
....
elif [[ $i = 99 ]]; then
echo "blah blah blah for" $i
command310
command311
command312
command313
command314
elif [[ $i = 100 ]]; then
echo "blah blah blah for" $i
command315
fi
done


Is there any better or smarter way to do these on bash










share|improve this question




















  • 2




    I'd start with a case statement case $i in 1) ... ;; 2) ... ;; ... ;; 99) ... ;; esac.
    – chepner
    Nov 19 at 20:20










  • @JosephLi write comments with unicorn emojis between elifs then it will look nice
    – oguzismail
    Nov 19 at 20:26















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have a file called file.txt which has some random numbers from 1 to 100. So a script reads the file and executes a bunch of commands and print some statements.



One way of achieving the result could be something like these but having 100 if and elif statement in a script doesn't look so nice.



for i in `cat file.txt`; do
echo "Displaying" $i
if [[ $i = 1 ]]; then
echo "blah blah blah for" $i
command1
command2
elif [[ $i = 2 ]]; then
echo "blah blah blah for" $i
command3
command4
command5
elif [[ $i = 3 ]]; then
echo "blah blah blah for" $i
command6
command7
elif [[ $i = 4 ]]; then
echo "blah blah blah for" $i
command8
command9
command10
elif [[ $i = 5 ]]; then
echo "blah blah blah for" $i
command11
command12
command13
command14
elif [[ $i = 6 ]]; then
echo "blah blah blah for" $i
command15

....
....
....
....
....
....
elif [[ $i = 99 ]]; then
echo "blah blah blah for" $i
command310
command311
command312
command313
command314
elif [[ $i = 100 ]]; then
echo "blah blah blah for" $i
command315
fi
done


Is there any better or smarter way to do these on bash










share|improve this question




















  • 2




    I'd start with a case statement case $i in 1) ... ;; 2) ... ;; ... ;; 99) ... ;; esac.
    – chepner
    Nov 19 at 20:20










  • @JosephLi write comments with unicorn emojis between elifs then it will look nice
    – oguzismail
    Nov 19 at 20:26













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I have a file called file.txt which has some random numbers from 1 to 100. So a script reads the file and executes a bunch of commands and print some statements.



One way of achieving the result could be something like these but having 100 if and elif statement in a script doesn't look so nice.



for i in `cat file.txt`; do
echo "Displaying" $i
if [[ $i = 1 ]]; then
echo "blah blah blah for" $i
command1
command2
elif [[ $i = 2 ]]; then
echo "blah blah blah for" $i
command3
command4
command5
elif [[ $i = 3 ]]; then
echo "blah blah blah for" $i
command6
command7
elif [[ $i = 4 ]]; then
echo "blah blah blah for" $i
command8
command9
command10
elif [[ $i = 5 ]]; then
echo "blah blah blah for" $i
command11
command12
command13
command14
elif [[ $i = 6 ]]; then
echo "blah blah blah for" $i
command15

....
....
....
....
....
....
elif [[ $i = 99 ]]; then
echo "blah blah blah for" $i
command310
command311
command312
command313
command314
elif [[ $i = 100 ]]; then
echo "blah blah blah for" $i
command315
fi
done


Is there any better or smarter way to do these on bash










share|improve this question















I have a file called file.txt which has some random numbers from 1 to 100. So a script reads the file and executes a bunch of commands and print some statements.



One way of achieving the result could be something like these but having 100 if and elif statement in a script doesn't look so nice.



for i in `cat file.txt`; do
echo "Displaying" $i
if [[ $i = 1 ]]; then
echo "blah blah blah for" $i
command1
command2
elif [[ $i = 2 ]]; then
echo "blah blah blah for" $i
command3
command4
command5
elif [[ $i = 3 ]]; then
echo "blah blah blah for" $i
command6
command7
elif [[ $i = 4 ]]; then
echo "blah blah blah for" $i
command8
command9
command10
elif [[ $i = 5 ]]; then
echo "blah blah blah for" $i
command11
command12
command13
command14
elif [[ $i = 6 ]]; then
echo "blah blah blah for" $i
command15

....
....
....
....
....
....
elif [[ $i = 99 ]]; then
echo "blah blah blah for" $i
command310
command311
command312
command313
command314
elif [[ $i = 100 ]]; then
echo "blah blah blah for" $i
command315
fi
done


Is there any better or smarter way to do these on bash







bash if-statement






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 19 at 22:20









kvantour

7,66631129




7,66631129










asked Nov 19 at 20:16









Joseph Li

1




1








  • 2




    I'd start with a case statement case $i in 1) ... ;; 2) ... ;; ... ;; 99) ... ;; esac.
    – chepner
    Nov 19 at 20:20










  • @JosephLi write comments with unicorn emojis between elifs then it will look nice
    – oguzismail
    Nov 19 at 20:26














  • 2




    I'd start with a case statement case $i in 1) ... ;; 2) ... ;; ... ;; 99) ... ;; esac.
    – chepner
    Nov 19 at 20:20










  • @JosephLi write comments with unicorn emojis between elifs then it will look nice
    – oguzismail
    Nov 19 at 20:26








2




2




I'd start with a case statement case $i in 1) ... ;; 2) ... ;; ... ;; 99) ... ;; esac.
– chepner
Nov 19 at 20:20




I'd start with a case statement case $i in 1) ... ;; 2) ... ;; ... ;; 99) ... ;; esac.
– chepner
Nov 19 at 20:20












@JosephLi write comments with unicorn emojis between elifs then it will look nice
– oguzismail
Nov 19 at 20:26




@JosephLi write comments with unicorn emojis between elifs then it will look nice
– oguzismail
Nov 19 at 20:26












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













Classic case of case:



case "$i" in
1)
echo "blah blah blah for" $i
command1
command2
;;
[…]
*)
echo "Unhandled value $i" >&2
exit 2
esac


In addition to this:





  • Use a while loop to process lines

  • Use More Quotes™






share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    My suggestion would be to make use of a case statement. It is the bash version of what is known in programming as the switch statement. They are generally faster then an if-then-else statement as they are most likely implemented with a lookup table or hash-list.




    Additionally, an optimized implementation may execute much faster than the alternative, because it is often implemented by using an indexed branch table. For example, deciding program flow based on a single character's value, if correctly implemented, is vastly more efficient than the alternative, reducing instruction path lengths considerably. When implemented as such, a switch statement essentially becomes a perfect hash.



    source: Wikipedia




    An interesting comparison can be found here: Which is faster of two case or if?



    To address your code, you're loop of the form



    for i in $(cat file); do
    ...
    done


    should be rewritten. As you read the file word-by-word, you should write something like:



    while read -r line; do
    for i in $line; do
    ...
    done
    done < file


    You're if-then-else is then rewritten as:



    case "$i" in
    1) command1; command2; command3 ;;
    2) command4; command5; command6 ;;
    ...
    100) command315; command316;;
    esac





    share|improve this answer



















    • 1




      Bash case statements are not optimised even when it is possible (and since the options are subject to parameter expansion, it may well not be possible. So they aren't much faster, but they are easier to write (and read). They are a little faster basically because they don't require the [/[[ commands to be interpreted.
      – rici
      Nov 19 at 22:11












    • @rici According to stackoverflow.com/questions/20018037/… there is a clear difference.
      – kvantour
      Nov 19 at 22:16










    • yes, but the difference is much more marked for the [ command than for the [[ builtin. It has nothing to do with lookup tables or indexed lookups.
      – rici
      Nov 19 at 22:33










    • @rici On my current system I still have a 1/3 speedup using case instead of [[ ... ]]]
      – kvantour
      Nov 19 at 22:42






    • 1




      You mean it's 33% faster, right? A hash table would be much faster, since it wouldn't require more than one test.
      – rici
      Nov 19 at 22:55











    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53381999%2fbetter-way-then-having-multiple-elif-statement%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    2
    down vote













    Classic case of case:



    case "$i" in
    1)
    echo "blah blah blah for" $i
    command1
    command2
    ;;
    […]
    *)
    echo "Unhandled value $i" >&2
    exit 2
    esac


    In addition to this:





    • Use a while loop to process lines

    • Use More Quotes™






    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      2
      down vote













      Classic case of case:



      case "$i" in
      1)
      echo "blah blah blah for" $i
      command1
      command2
      ;;
      […]
      *)
      echo "Unhandled value $i" >&2
      exit 2
      esac


      In addition to this:





      • Use a while loop to process lines

      • Use More Quotes™






      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        2
        down vote










        up vote
        2
        down vote









        Classic case of case:



        case "$i" in
        1)
        echo "blah blah blah for" $i
        command1
        command2
        ;;
        […]
        *)
        echo "Unhandled value $i" >&2
        exit 2
        esac


        In addition to this:





        • Use a while loop to process lines

        • Use More Quotes™






        share|improve this answer












        Classic case of case:



        case "$i" in
        1)
        echo "blah blah blah for" $i
        command1
        command2
        ;;
        […]
        *)
        echo "Unhandled value $i" >&2
        exit 2
        esac


        In addition to this:





        • Use a while loop to process lines

        • Use More Quotes™







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 19 at 20:31









        l0b0

        33.1k1583144




        33.1k1583144
























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            My suggestion would be to make use of a case statement. It is the bash version of what is known in programming as the switch statement. They are generally faster then an if-then-else statement as they are most likely implemented with a lookup table or hash-list.




            Additionally, an optimized implementation may execute much faster than the alternative, because it is often implemented by using an indexed branch table. For example, deciding program flow based on a single character's value, if correctly implemented, is vastly more efficient than the alternative, reducing instruction path lengths considerably. When implemented as such, a switch statement essentially becomes a perfect hash.



            source: Wikipedia




            An interesting comparison can be found here: Which is faster of two case or if?



            To address your code, you're loop of the form



            for i in $(cat file); do
            ...
            done


            should be rewritten. As you read the file word-by-word, you should write something like:



            while read -r line; do
            for i in $line; do
            ...
            done
            done < file


            You're if-then-else is then rewritten as:



            case "$i" in
            1) command1; command2; command3 ;;
            2) command4; command5; command6 ;;
            ...
            100) command315; command316;;
            esac





            share|improve this answer



















            • 1




              Bash case statements are not optimised even when it is possible (and since the options are subject to parameter expansion, it may well not be possible. So they aren't much faster, but they are easier to write (and read). They are a little faster basically because they don't require the [/[[ commands to be interpreted.
              – rici
              Nov 19 at 22:11












            • @rici According to stackoverflow.com/questions/20018037/… there is a clear difference.
              – kvantour
              Nov 19 at 22:16










            • yes, but the difference is much more marked for the [ command than for the [[ builtin. It has nothing to do with lookup tables or indexed lookups.
              – rici
              Nov 19 at 22:33










            • @rici On my current system I still have a 1/3 speedup using case instead of [[ ... ]]]
              – kvantour
              Nov 19 at 22:42






            • 1




              You mean it's 33% faster, right? A hash table would be much faster, since it wouldn't require more than one test.
              – rici
              Nov 19 at 22:55















            up vote
            1
            down vote













            My suggestion would be to make use of a case statement. It is the bash version of what is known in programming as the switch statement. They are generally faster then an if-then-else statement as they are most likely implemented with a lookup table or hash-list.




            Additionally, an optimized implementation may execute much faster than the alternative, because it is often implemented by using an indexed branch table. For example, deciding program flow based on a single character's value, if correctly implemented, is vastly more efficient than the alternative, reducing instruction path lengths considerably. When implemented as such, a switch statement essentially becomes a perfect hash.



            source: Wikipedia




            An interesting comparison can be found here: Which is faster of two case or if?



            To address your code, you're loop of the form



            for i in $(cat file); do
            ...
            done


            should be rewritten. As you read the file word-by-word, you should write something like:



            while read -r line; do
            for i in $line; do
            ...
            done
            done < file


            You're if-then-else is then rewritten as:



            case "$i" in
            1) command1; command2; command3 ;;
            2) command4; command5; command6 ;;
            ...
            100) command315; command316;;
            esac





            share|improve this answer



















            • 1




              Bash case statements are not optimised even when it is possible (and since the options are subject to parameter expansion, it may well not be possible. So they aren't much faster, but they are easier to write (and read). They are a little faster basically because they don't require the [/[[ commands to be interpreted.
              – rici
              Nov 19 at 22:11












            • @rici According to stackoverflow.com/questions/20018037/… there is a clear difference.
              – kvantour
              Nov 19 at 22:16










            • yes, but the difference is much more marked for the [ command than for the [[ builtin. It has nothing to do with lookup tables or indexed lookups.
              – rici
              Nov 19 at 22:33










            • @rici On my current system I still have a 1/3 speedup using case instead of [[ ... ]]]
              – kvantour
              Nov 19 at 22:42






            • 1




              You mean it's 33% faster, right? A hash table would be much faster, since it wouldn't require more than one test.
              – rici
              Nov 19 at 22:55













            up vote
            1
            down vote










            up vote
            1
            down vote









            My suggestion would be to make use of a case statement. It is the bash version of what is known in programming as the switch statement. They are generally faster then an if-then-else statement as they are most likely implemented with a lookup table or hash-list.




            Additionally, an optimized implementation may execute much faster than the alternative, because it is often implemented by using an indexed branch table. For example, deciding program flow based on a single character's value, if correctly implemented, is vastly more efficient than the alternative, reducing instruction path lengths considerably. When implemented as such, a switch statement essentially becomes a perfect hash.



            source: Wikipedia




            An interesting comparison can be found here: Which is faster of two case or if?



            To address your code, you're loop of the form



            for i in $(cat file); do
            ...
            done


            should be rewritten. As you read the file word-by-word, you should write something like:



            while read -r line; do
            for i in $line; do
            ...
            done
            done < file


            You're if-then-else is then rewritten as:



            case "$i" in
            1) command1; command2; command3 ;;
            2) command4; command5; command6 ;;
            ...
            100) command315; command316;;
            esac





            share|improve this answer














            My suggestion would be to make use of a case statement. It is the bash version of what is known in programming as the switch statement. They are generally faster then an if-then-else statement as they are most likely implemented with a lookup table or hash-list.




            Additionally, an optimized implementation may execute much faster than the alternative, because it is often implemented by using an indexed branch table. For example, deciding program flow based on a single character's value, if correctly implemented, is vastly more efficient than the alternative, reducing instruction path lengths considerably. When implemented as such, a switch statement essentially becomes a perfect hash.



            source: Wikipedia




            An interesting comparison can be found here: Which is faster of two case or if?



            To address your code, you're loop of the form



            for i in $(cat file); do
            ...
            done


            should be rewritten. As you read the file word-by-word, you should write something like:



            while read -r line; do
            for i in $line; do
            ...
            done
            done < file


            You're if-then-else is then rewritten as:



            case "$i" in
            1) command1; command2; command3 ;;
            2) command4; command5; command6 ;;
            ...
            100) command315; command316;;
            esac






            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Nov 19 at 20:44

























            answered Nov 19 at 20:35









            kvantour

            7,66631129




            7,66631129








            • 1




              Bash case statements are not optimised even when it is possible (and since the options are subject to parameter expansion, it may well not be possible. So they aren't much faster, but they are easier to write (and read). They are a little faster basically because they don't require the [/[[ commands to be interpreted.
              – rici
              Nov 19 at 22:11












            • @rici According to stackoverflow.com/questions/20018037/… there is a clear difference.
              – kvantour
              Nov 19 at 22:16










            • yes, but the difference is much more marked for the [ command than for the [[ builtin. It has nothing to do with lookup tables or indexed lookups.
              – rici
              Nov 19 at 22:33










            • @rici On my current system I still have a 1/3 speedup using case instead of [[ ... ]]]
              – kvantour
              Nov 19 at 22:42






            • 1




              You mean it's 33% faster, right? A hash table would be much faster, since it wouldn't require more than one test.
              – rici
              Nov 19 at 22:55














            • 1




              Bash case statements are not optimised even when it is possible (and since the options are subject to parameter expansion, it may well not be possible. So they aren't much faster, but they are easier to write (and read). They are a little faster basically because they don't require the [/[[ commands to be interpreted.
              – rici
              Nov 19 at 22:11












            • @rici According to stackoverflow.com/questions/20018037/… there is a clear difference.
              – kvantour
              Nov 19 at 22:16










            • yes, but the difference is much more marked for the [ command than for the [[ builtin. It has nothing to do with lookup tables or indexed lookups.
              – rici
              Nov 19 at 22:33










            • @rici On my current system I still have a 1/3 speedup using case instead of [[ ... ]]]
              – kvantour
              Nov 19 at 22:42






            • 1




              You mean it's 33% faster, right? A hash table would be much faster, since it wouldn't require more than one test.
              – rici
              Nov 19 at 22:55








            1




            1




            Bash case statements are not optimised even when it is possible (and since the options are subject to parameter expansion, it may well not be possible. So they aren't much faster, but they are easier to write (and read). They are a little faster basically because they don't require the [/[[ commands to be interpreted.
            – rici
            Nov 19 at 22:11






            Bash case statements are not optimised even when it is possible (and since the options are subject to parameter expansion, it may well not be possible. So they aren't much faster, but they are easier to write (and read). They are a little faster basically because they don't require the [/[[ commands to be interpreted.
            – rici
            Nov 19 at 22:11














            @rici According to stackoverflow.com/questions/20018037/… there is a clear difference.
            – kvantour
            Nov 19 at 22:16




            @rici According to stackoverflow.com/questions/20018037/… there is a clear difference.
            – kvantour
            Nov 19 at 22:16












            yes, but the difference is much more marked for the [ command than for the [[ builtin. It has nothing to do with lookup tables or indexed lookups.
            – rici
            Nov 19 at 22:33




            yes, but the difference is much more marked for the [ command than for the [[ builtin. It has nothing to do with lookup tables or indexed lookups.
            – rici
            Nov 19 at 22:33












            @rici On my current system I still have a 1/3 speedup using case instead of [[ ... ]]]
            – kvantour
            Nov 19 at 22:42




            @rici On my current system I still have a 1/3 speedup using case instead of [[ ... ]]]
            – kvantour
            Nov 19 at 22:42




            1




            1




            You mean it's 33% faster, right? A hash table would be much faster, since it wouldn't require more than one test.
            – rici
            Nov 19 at 22:55




            You mean it's 33% faster, right? A hash table would be much faster, since it wouldn't require more than one test.
            – rici
            Nov 19 at 22:55


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53381999%2fbetter-way-then-having-multiple-elif-statement%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Costa Masnaga

            Fotorealismo

            Sidney Franklin