Enforcing entire website is clickable using Enter for accessibility (like NVDA/JAWS do)












0















The ensure all elements are clickable using the Enter key, I'm using the following method:



document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e){
if( e.keyCode === 13 ) {
e.target.click();
}
});


And for most clicks, it works really well. The problem is with elements that don't have a click event bound directly, but are clickable through bubbling up. For example:



    jQuery(document).on('click', function(e){
jQuery(e.target).addClass('active');
});


Clickable elements that are bound this way, will not be triggered using the first example. I've found out that NVDA, somehow, literally makes all elements clickable using the keyboard, whatever the method used to bind them. If NVDA is turned on, elements that are bound just like in example number 2 will be triggered.



I'd like to understand how NVDA does this (or if you have another idea to approach this) so I can copy that behavior to my application, that is being used by people with motor impairments and have to use the keyboard solely, without screen readers.



The solution has to be pure JS or jQuery.










share|improve this question























  • Try using $(e.target).trigger('click'). Calling click() on the raw Element, is not going to invoke jQuery event listeners.

    – Taplar
    Nov 23 '18 at 21:50
















0















The ensure all elements are clickable using the Enter key, I'm using the following method:



document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e){
if( e.keyCode === 13 ) {
e.target.click();
}
});


And for most clicks, it works really well. The problem is with elements that don't have a click event bound directly, but are clickable through bubbling up. For example:



    jQuery(document).on('click', function(e){
jQuery(e.target).addClass('active');
});


Clickable elements that are bound this way, will not be triggered using the first example. I've found out that NVDA, somehow, literally makes all elements clickable using the keyboard, whatever the method used to bind them. If NVDA is turned on, elements that are bound just like in example number 2 will be triggered.



I'd like to understand how NVDA does this (or if you have another idea to approach this) so I can copy that behavior to my application, that is being used by people with motor impairments and have to use the keyboard solely, without screen readers.



The solution has to be pure JS or jQuery.










share|improve this question























  • Try using $(e.target).trigger('click'). Calling click() on the raw Element, is not going to invoke jQuery event listeners.

    – Taplar
    Nov 23 '18 at 21:50














0












0








0


1






The ensure all elements are clickable using the Enter key, I'm using the following method:



document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e){
if( e.keyCode === 13 ) {
e.target.click();
}
});


And for most clicks, it works really well. The problem is with elements that don't have a click event bound directly, but are clickable through bubbling up. For example:



    jQuery(document).on('click', function(e){
jQuery(e.target).addClass('active');
});


Clickable elements that are bound this way, will not be triggered using the first example. I've found out that NVDA, somehow, literally makes all elements clickable using the keyboard, whatever the method used to bind them. If NVDA is turned on, elements that are bound just like in example number 2 will be triggered.



I'd like to understand how NVDA does this (or if you have another idea to approach this) so I can copy that behavior to my application, that is being used by people with motor impairments and have to use the keyboard solely, without screen readers.



The solution has to be pure JS or jQuery.










share|improve this question














The ensure all elements are clickable using the Enter key, I'm using the following method:



document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e){
if( e.keyCode === 13 ) {
e.target.click();
}
});


And for most clicks, it works really well. The problem is with elements that don't have a click event bound directly, but are clickable through bubbling up. For example:



    jQuery(document).on('click', function(e){
jQuery(e.target).addClass('active');
});


Clickable elements that are bound this way, will not be triggered using the first example. I've found out that NVDA, somehow, literally makes all elements clickable using the keyboard, whatever the method used to bind them. If NVDA is turned on, elements that are bound just like in example number 2 will be triggered.



I'd like to understand how NVDA does this (or if you have another idea to approach this) so I can copy that behavior to my application, that is being used by people with motor impairments and have to use the keyboard solely, without screen readers.



The solution has to be pure JS or jQuery.







javascript jquery accessibility nvda web-accessibility






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 23 '18 at 21:27









user3586610user3586610

7918




7918













  • Try using $(e.target).trigger('click'). Calling click() on the raw Element, is not going to invoke jQuery event listeners.

    – Taplar
    Nov 23 '18 at 21:50



















  • Try using $(e.target).trigger('click'). Calling click() on the raw Element, is not going to invoke jQuery event listeners.

    – Taplar
    Nov 23 '18 at 21:50

















Try using $(e.target).trigger('click'). Calling click() on the raw Element, is not going to invoke jQuery event listeners.

– Taplar
Nov 23 '18 at 21:50





Try using $(e.target).trigger('click'). Calling click() on the raw Element, is not going to invoke jQuery event listeners.

– Taplar
Nov 23 '18 at 21:50












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














It is really great that you're interested in making your site accessible, it is very much appreciated.

But please, don't do such things, they yield unpredictable screen reader behavior and often upset the accessibility tree itself.

Rather than making all elements clickable, just think about what result you need to achieve. If you want your links and buttons to be usable with a screen reader, you have to do nothing, it's already implemented in HTML - boom, no Javascript, no jQuery, pure HTML.

If for some reason you want your divs act like buttons and spans act like links, just use ARIA roles:



<div id="myDiv" role="button">Click me!</div>
I'm a link to <span id="linkToGoogle" role="link">Google</span>, isn't that nice?


Again - boom, no Javascript, no jQuery, pure HTML.

However, if you can and where you can, just use semantical HTML elements, not ARIA roles: <button> for buttons, <a href...> for links and so on. I could elaborate more if I knew what specifically you want to make clickable.






share|improve this answer
























  • That's a great advice for creating websites from scratch. When using templates, or handling websites that were built by amateurs, it's either JS or wipe everything out and start from scratch, which is non-realistic. Therefore, I'm looking for a solution that works despite using non-semantic HTML, and for people that aren't using screen reader (Motor impairments for example).

    – user3586610
    Nov 23 '18 at 22:18











  • OK then, for more understanding I'd like to ask you for a bit of code. No styles, no sensitive info, just something that is not clickable and you with it to be clickable. Everything just doesn't work, I told you why.

    – Andre Polykanine
    Nov 24 '18 at 22:45






  • 1





    This answer is incorrect about ARIA roles. Merely adding a link or button role to a span will NOT make it behave like a link or button. You will need to use a tabindex, keypress handiler, and click handler too. ARIA roles don't make an element behave differently, they only change the semantics which are reported to assistive technology.

    – andrewmacpherson
    Nov 26 '18 at 2:29













  • It seems, the OP has implemented onClick handlers, so the website lacks ARIA support. Anyway, it's too complicated to say anything for sure without any code.

    – Andre Polykanine
    Nov 27 '18 at 20:35











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53453107%2fenforcing-entire-website-is-clickable-using-enter-for-accessibility-like-nvda-j%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














It is really great that you're interested in making your site accessible, it is very much appreciated.

But please, don't do such things, they yield unpredictable screen reader behavior and often upset the accessibility tree itself.

Rather than making all elements clickable, just think about what result you need to achieve. If you want your links and buttons to be usable with a screen reader, you have to do nothing, it's already implemented in HTML - boom, no Javascript, no jQuery, pure HTML.

If for some reason you want your divs act like buttons and spans act like links, just use ARIA roles:



<div id="myDiv" role="button">Click me!</div>
I'm a link to <span id="linkToGoogle" role="link">Google</span>, isn't that nice?


Again - boom, no Javascript, no jQuery, pure HTML.

However, if you can and where you can, just use semantical HTML elements, not ARIA roles: <button> for buttons, <a href...> for links and so on. I could elaborate more if I knew what specifically you want to make clickable.






share|improve this answer
























  • That's a great advice for creating websites from scratch. When using templates, or handling websites that were built by amateurs, it's either JS or wipe everything out and start from scratch, which is non-realistic. Therefore, I'm looking for a solution that works despite using non-semantic HTML, and for people that aren't using screen reader (Motor impairments for example).

    – user3586610
    Nov 23 '18 at 22:18











  • OK then, for more understanding I'd like to ask you for a bit of code. No styles, no sensitive info, just something that is not clickable and you with it to be clickable. Everything just doesn't work, I told you why.

    – Andre Polykanine
    Nov 24 '18 at 22:45






  • 1





    This answer is incorrect about ARIA roles. Merely adding a link or button role to a span will NOT make it behave like a link or button. You will need to use a tabindex, keypress handiler, and click handler too. ARIA roles don't make an element behave differently, they only change the semantics which are reported to assistive technology.

    – andrewmacpherson
    Nov 26 '18 at 2:29













  • It seems, the OP has implemented onClick handlers, so the website lacks ARIA support. Anyway, it's too complicated to say anything for sure without any code.

    – Andre Polykanine
    Nov 27 '18 at 20:35
















0














It is really great that you're interested in making your site accessible, it is very much appreciated.

But please, don't do such things, they yield unpredictable screen reader behavior and often upset the accessibility tree itself.

Rather than making all elements clickable, just think about what result you need to achieve. If you want your links and buttons to be usable with a screen reader, you have to do nothing, it's already implemented in HTML - boom, no Javascript, no jQuery, pure HTML.

If for some reason you want your divs act like buttons and spans act like links, just use ARIA roles:



<div id="myDiv" role="button">Click me!</div>
I'm a link to <span id="linkToGoogle" role="link">Google</span>, isn't that nice?


Again - boom, no Javascript, no jQuery, pure HTML.

However, if you can and where you can, just use semantical HTML elements, not ARIA roles: <button> for buttons, <a href...> for links and so on. I could elaborate more if I knew what specifically you want to make clickable.






share|improve this answer
























  • That's a great advice for creating websites from scratch. When using templates, or handling websites that were built by amateurs, it's either JS or wipe everything out and start from scratch, which is non-realistic. Therefore, I'm looking for a solution that works despite using non-semantic HTML, and for people that aren't using screen reader (Motor impairments for example).

    – user3586610
    Nov 23 '18 at 22:18











  • OK then, for more understanding I'd like to ask you for a bit of code. No styles, no sensitive info, just something that is not clickable and you with it to be clickable. Everything just doesn't work, I told you why.

    – Andre Polykanine
    Nov 24 '18 at 22:45






  • 1





    This answer is incorrect about ARIA roles. Merely adding a link or button role to a span will NOT make it behave like a link or button. You will need to use a tabindex, keypress handiler, and click handler too. ARIA roles don't make an element behave differently, they only change the semantics which are reported to assistive technology.

    – andrewmacpherson
    Nov 26 '18 at 2:29













  • It seems, the OP has implemented onClick handlers, so the website lacks ARIA support. Anyway, it's too complicated to say anything for sure without any code.

    – Andre Polykanine
    Nov 27 '18 at 20:35














0












0








0







It is really great that you're interested in making your site accessible, it is very much appreciated.

But please, don't do such things, they yield unpredictable screen reader behavior and often upset the accessibility tree itself.

Rather than making all elements clickable, just think about what result you need to achieve. If you want your links and buttons to be usable with a screen reader, you have to do nothing, it's already implemented in HTML - boom, no Javascript, no jQuery, pure HTML.

If for some reason you want your divs act like buttons and spans act like links, just use ARIA roles:



<div id="myDiv" role="button">Click me!</div>
I'm a link to <span id="linkToGoogle" role="link">Google</span>, isn't that nice?


Again - boom, no Javascript, no jQuery, pure HTML.

However, if you can and where you can, just use semantical HTML elements, not ARIA roles: <button> for buttons, <a href...> for links and so on. I could elaborate more if I knew what specifically you want to make clickable.






share|improve this answer













It is really great that you're interested in making your site accessible, it is very much appreciated.

But please, don't do such things, they yield unpredictable screen reader behavior and often upset the accessibility tree itself.

Rather than making all elements clickable, just think about what result you need to achieve. If you want your links and buttons to be usable with a screen reader, you have to do nothing, it's already implemented in HTML - boom, no Javascript, no jQuery, pure HTML.

If for some reason you want your divs act like buttons and spans act like links, just use ARIA roles:



<div id="myDiv" role="button">Click me!</div>
I'm a link to <span id="linkToGoogle" role="link">Google</span>, isn't that nice?


Again - boom, no Javascript, no jQuery, pure HTML.

However, if you can and where you can, just use semantical HTML elements, not ARIA roles: <button> for buttons, <a href...> for links and so on. I could elaborate more if I knew what specifically you want to make clickable.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 23 '18 at 22:08









Andre PolykanineAndre Polykanine

2,4091122




2,4091122













  • That's a great advice for creating websites from scratch. When using templates, or handling websites that were built by amateurs, it's either JS or wipe everything out and start from scratch, which is non-realistic. Therefore, I'm looking for a solution that works despite using non-semantic HTML, and for people that aren't using screen reader (Motor impairments for example).

    – user3586610
    Nov 23 '18 at 22:18











  • OK then, for more understanding I'd like to ask you for a bit of code. No styles, no sensitive info, just something that is not clickable and you with it to be clickable. Everything just doesn't work, I told you why.

    – Andre Polykanine
    Nov 24 '18 at 22:45






  • 1





    This answer is incorrect about ARIA roles. Merely adding a link or button role to a span will NOT make it behave like a link or button. You will need to use a tabindex, keypress handiler, and click handler too. ARIA roles don't make an element behave differently, they only change the semantics which are reported to assistive technology.

    – andrewmacpherson
    Nov 26 '18 at 2:29













  • It seems, the OP has implemented onClick handlers, so the website lacks ARIA support. Anyway, it's too complicated to say anything for sure without any code.

    – Andre Polykanine
    Nov 27 '18 at 20:35



















  • That's a great advice for creating websites from scratch. When using templates, or handling websites that were built by amateurs, it's either JS or wipe everything out and start from scratch, which is non-realistic. Therefore, I'm looking for a solution that works despite using non-semantic HTML, and for people that aren't using screen reader (Motor impairments for example).

    – user3586610
    Nov 23 '18 at 22:18











  • OK then, for more understanding I'd like to ask you for a bit of code. No styles, no sensitive info, just something that is not clickable and you with it to be clickable. Everything just doesn't work, I told you why.

    – Andre Polykanine
    Nov 24 '18 at 22:45






  • 1





    This answer is incorrect about ARIA roles. Merely adding a link or button role to a span will NOT make it behave like a link or button. You will need to use a tabindex, keypress handiler, and click handler too. ARIA roles don't make an element behave differently, they only change the semantics which are reported to assistive technology.

    – andrewmacpherson
    Nov 26 '18 at 2:29













  • It seems, the OP has implemented onClick handlers, so the website lacks ARIA support. Anyway, it's too complicated to say anything for sure without any code.

    – Andre Polykanine
    Nov 27 '18 at 20:35

















That's a great advice for creating websites from scratch. When using templates, or handling websites that were built by amateurs, it's either JS or wipe everything out and start from scratch, which is non-realistic. Therefore, I'm looking for a solution that works despite using non-semantic HTML, and for people that aren't using screen reader (Motor impairments for example).

– user3586610
Nov 23 '18 at 22:18





That's a great advice for creating websites from scratch. When using templates, or handling websites that were built by amateurs, it's either JS or wipe everything out and start from scratch, which is non-realistic. Therefore, I'm looking for a solution that works despite using non-semantic HTML, and for people that aren't using screen reader (Motor impairments for example).

– user3586610
Nov 23 '18 at 22:18













OK then, for more understanding I'd like to ask you for a bit of code. No styles, no sensitive info, just something that is not clickable and you with it to be clickable. Everything just doesn't work, I told you why.

– Andre Polykanine
Nov 24 '18 at 22:45





OK then, for more understanding I'd like to ask you for a bit of code. No styles, no sensitive info, just something that is not clickable and you with it to be clickable. Everything just doesn't work, I told you why.

– Andre Polykanine
Nov 24 '18 at 22:45




1




1





This answer is incorrect about ARIA roles. Merely adding a link or button role to a span will NOT make it behave like a link or button. You will need to use a tabindex, keypress handiler, and click handler too. ARIA roles don't make an element behave differently, they only change the semantics which are reported to assistive technology.

– andrewmacpherson
Nov 26 '18 at 2:29







This answer is incorrect about ARIA roles. Merely adding a link or button role to a span will NOT make it behave like a link or button. You will need to use a tabindex, keypress handiler, and click handler too. ARIA roles don't make an element behave differently, they only change the semantics which are reported to assistive technology.

– andrewmacpherson
Nov 26 '18 at 2:29















It seems, the OP has implemented onClick handlers, so the website lacks ARIA support. Anyway, it's too complicated to say anything for sure without any code.

– Andre Polykanine
Nov 27 '18 at 20:35





It seems, the OP has implemented onClick handlers, so the website lacks ARIA support. Anyway, it's too complicated to say anything for sure without any code.

– Andre Polykanine
Nov 27 '18 at 20:35




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53453107%2fenforcing-entire-website-is-clickable-using-enter-for-accessibility-like-nvda-j%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Costa Masnaga

Fotorealismo

Sidney Franklin