Japanese Temple Problem From 1844
up vote
18
down vote
favorite
I recently learnt a Japanese geometry temple problem.
The problem is the following:
Five squares are arranged as the image shows. Prove that the area of triangle T and the area of square S are equal.
This is problem 6 in this article.
I am thinking about law of cosines, but I have not been able to prove the theorem. Any hints would be appreciated.
geometry sangaku
add a comment |
up vote
18
down vote
favorite
I recently learnt a Japanese geometry temple problem.
The problem is the following:
Five squares are arranged as the image shows. Prove that the area of triangle T and the area of square S are equal.
This is problem 6 in this article.
I am thinking about law of cosines, but I have not been able to prove the theorem. Any hints would be appreciated.
geometry sangaku
add a comment |
up vote
18
down vote
favorite
up vote
18
down vote
favorite
I recently learnt a Japanese geometry temple problem.
The problem is the following:
Five squares are arranged as the image shows. Prove that the area of triangle T and the area of square S are equal.
This is problem 6 in this article.
I am thinking about law of cosines, but I have not been able to prove the theorem. Any hints would be appreciated.
geometry sangaku
I recently learnt a Japanese geometry temple problem.
The problem is the following:
Five squares are arranged as the image shows. Prove that the area of triangle T and the area of square S are equal.
This is problem 6 in this article.
I am thinking about law of cosines, but I have not been able to prove the theorem. Any hints would be appreciated.
geometry sangaku
geometry sangaku
edited 10 hours ago
Jean-Claude Arbaut
14.5k63361
14.5k63361
asked 10 hours ago
Larry
9341321
9341321
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
13
down vote
accepted
We will, first of all, prove a very interesting property
$mathbf{Lemma;1}$
Given two squares PQRS and PTUV (as shown on the picture), the triangles $Delta STP$ and $Delta PVQ$ have equal area.
$mathbf {Proof}$
Denote by $alpha$ the angle SPT and by $[...]$ the area of the polygon "...". Hence
$$[Delta STP]=frac{overline {PS}*overline {PT}*sin(alpha)}{2}$$ $$[Delta PVQ]=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}*sinBigl(360°-(90°+90+alpha)Bigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}*sinBigl(180°-alphaBigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}*sin(alpha)}{2}$$
Since $overline {PS}=overline {PQ}$ and $overline {PT}=overline {PV}$ $$[Delta STP]=[Delta PVQ]$$
Now, back to the problem
Let $overline {AB}=a$ and $overline {IJ}=b$. Note first of all that $$Delta BEC cong Delta EIF$$
See why? $mathbf {Hint:}$
It is obvious that $overline {CE}=overline {EF}$. Use the properties of right triangles in order to show that all angles are equal.
Thus $${(overline{CE})^2}={a^2}+{b^2}=S$$
Note furthermore that $$[Delta BEC]=[Delta EIF]=frac{ab}{2}$$
By Lemma 1:
$$[Delta DCG]=[Delta BEC]=frac{ab}{2}=[Delta EIF]=[Delta GFK]$$
The area of the polygon AJKGD is thus
$$[AJKGD]=[ABCD]+[CEFG]+[FIJK]+4[Delta DCG]=2Bigl({a^2}+{b^2}Bigr)+2ab$$
The area of the trapezoid AJKD is moreover
$$[AJKD]=frac{(a+b)(2a+2b)}{2}={a^2}+2ab+{b^2}$$
Finally
$$T=[Delta DKG]=[AJKGD]-[AJKD]={a^2}+{b^2}=S Rightarrow S=T$$
1
Nice. Maybe one can simplify the proof of the Lemma. Rotate $QPV$ by $pi/2$ clokwise around $P$; you get a triangle with the same basis and same heigth as $PST$.
– D. Thomine
9 hours ago
2
+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer, but I learned a lot from this and wish I could have come up with it myself.
– J.G.
8 hours ago
@Dr. Mathva: Thank you so much for your answer!
– Larry
8 hours ago
"+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer" - that's a bit unpleasant
– Mitch Wheat
1 hour ago
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
$$|square P_1 P_2 P_3 P_4| = (a+b)^2 = frac12(a+b)(2a+2b) = |square Q_1 Q_2 Q_3 Q_4|quad=:R$$
$$S ;=; R - 4cdotfrac12ab ;=; T$$
(This space intentionally left blank.)
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
This is a long comment.
The shapes $S,,T$ share a vertex $A$ where six angles meet, three of them right angles. The other three angles therefore sum to a right angle. Let $theta$ be the angle in $T$, so the two other acute angles, and the right angle between them from $S$, sum to $pi-theta$. Since $sintheta=sin(pi-theta)$, $T$ has the same area as $triangle ABC$, where $BA,,AC$ are sides of the upper squares.
The challenge, then, is to show $S$ has that much area too. Let $D$ denote the vertex of $S$ opposite $A$. I suspect we can show the quadrilateral $BACD$ has twice the area of $S$, and also twice the area of $triangle ABC$.
I don't think that $BACD$ has twice the area of $ABC$. If you try to move $ABC$ by shearing to get a triangle with side $BC$ and something on the bottom line, the third point isn't $D$.
– D. Thomine
9 hours ago
$BACD$ is a rhombus because its opposite sides are parallel. So it does have twice the area of $ABC$.
– I like Serena
9 hours ago
$BACD$ is not a rhombus.
– D. Thomine
9 hours ago
Sorry, I meant parallellogram @D.Thomine.
– I like Serena
9 hours ago
Not a parallelogram either.
– D. Thomine
9 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
13
down vote
accepted
We will, first of all, prove a very interesting property
$mathbf{Lemma;1}$
Given two squares PQRS and PTUV (as shown on the picture), the triangles $Delta STP$ and $Delta PVQ$ have equal area.
$mathbf {Proof}$
Denote by $alpha$ the angle SPT and by $[...]$ the area of the polygon "...". Hence
$$[Delta STP]=frac{overline {PS}*overline {PT}*sin(alpha)}{2}$$ $$[Delta PVQ]=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}*sinBigl(360°-(90°+90+alpha)Bigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}*sinBigl(180°-alphaBigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}*sin(alpha)}{2}$$
Since $overline {PS}=overline {PQ}$ and $overline {PT}=overline {PV}$ $$[Delta STP]=[Delta PVQ]$$
Now, back to the problem
Let $overline {AB}=a$ and $overline {IJ}=b$. Note first of all that $$Delta BEC cong Delta EIF$$
See why? $mathbf {Hint:}$
It is obvious that $overline {CE}=overline {EF}$. Use the properties of right triangles in order to show that all angles are equal.
Thus $${(overline{CE})^2}={a^2}+{b^2}=S$$
Note furthermore that $$[Delta BEC]=[Delta EIF]=frac{ab}{2}$$
By Lemma 1:
$$[Delta DCG]=[Delta BEC]=frac{ab}{2}=[Delta EIF]=[Delta GFK]$$
The area of the polygon AJKGD is thus
$$[AJKGD]=[ABCD]+[CEFG]+[FIJK]+4[Delta DCG]=2Bigl({a^2}+{b^2}Bigr)+2ab$$
The area of the trapezoid AJKD is moreover
$$[AJKD]=frac{(a+b)(2a+2b)}{2}={a^2}+2ab+{b^2}$$
Finally
$$T=[Delta DKG]=[AJKGD]-[AJKD]={a^2}+{b^2}=S Rightarrow S=T$$
1
Nice. Maybe one can simplify the proof of the Lemma. Rotate $QPV$ by $pi/2$ clokwise around $P$; you get a triangle with the same basis and same heigth as $PST$.
– D. Thomine
9 hours ago
2
+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer, but I learned a lot from this and wish I could have come up with it myself.
– J.G.
8 hours ago
@Dr. Mathva: Thank you so much for your answer!
– Larry
8 hours ago
"+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer" - that's a bit unpleasant
– Mitch Wheat
1 hour ago
add a comment |
up vote
13
down vote
accepted
We will, first of all, prove a very interesting property
$mathbf{Lemma;1}$
Given two squares PQRS and PTUV (as shown on the picture), the triangles $Delta STP$ and $Delta PVQ$ have equal area.
$mathbf {Proof}$
Denote by $alpha$ the angle SPT and by $[...]$ the area of the polygon "...". Hence
$$[Delta STP]=frac{overline {PS}*overline {PT}*sin(alpha)}{2}$$ $$[Delta PVQ]=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}*sinBigl(360°-(90°+90+alpha)Bigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}*sinBigl(180°-alphaBigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}*sin(alpha)}{2}$$
Since $overline {PS}=overline {PQ}$ and $overline {PT}=overline {PV}$ $$[Delta STP]=[Delta PVQ]$$
Now, back to the problem
Let $overline {AB}=a$ and $overline {IJ}=b$. Note first of all that $$Delta BEC cong Delta EIF$$
See why? $mathbf {Hint:}$
It is obvious that $overline {CE}=overline {EF}$. Use the properties of right triangles in order to show that all angles are equal.
Thus $${(overline{CE})^2}={a^2}+{b^2}=S$$
Note furthermore that $$[Delta BEC]=[Delta EIF]=frac{ab}{2}$$
By Lemma 1:
$$[Delta DCG]=[Delta BEC]=frac{ab}{2}=[Delta EIF]=[Delta GFK]$$
The area of the polygon AJKGD is thus
$$[AJKGD]=[ABCD]+[CEFG]+[FIJK]+4[Delta DCG]=2Bigl({a^2}+{b^2}Bigr)+2ab$$
The area of the trapezoid AJKD is moreover
$$[AJKD]=frac{(a+b)(2a+2b)}{2}={a^2}+2ab+{b^2}$$
Finally
$$T=[Delta DKG]=[AJKGD]-[AJKD]={a^2}+{b^2}=S Rightarrow S=T$$
1
Nice. Maybe one can simplify the proof of the Lemma. Rotate $QPV$ by $pi/2$ clokwise around $P$; you get a triangle with the same basis and same heigth as $PST$.
– D. Thomine
9 hours ago
2
+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer, but I learned a lot from this and wish I could have come up with it myself.
– J.G.
8 hours ago
@Dr. Mathva: Thank you so much for your answer!
– Larry
8 hours ago
"+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer" - that's a bit unpleasant
– Mitch Wheat
1 hour ago
add a comment |
up vote
13
down vote
accepted
up vote
13
down vote
accepted
We will, first of all, prove a very interesting property
$mathbf{Lemma;1}$
Given two squares PQRS and PTUV (as shown on the picture), the triangles $Delta STP$ and $Delta PVQ$ have equal area.
$mathbf {Proof}$
Denote by $alpha$ the angle SPT and by $[...]$ the area of the polygon "...". Hence
$$[Delta STP]=frac{overline {PS}*overline {PT}*sin(alpha)}{2}$$ $$[Delta PVQ]=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}*sinBigl(360°-(90°+90+alpha)Bigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}*sinBigl(180°-alphaBigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}*sin(alpha)}{2}$$
Since $overline {PS}=overline {PQ}$ and $overline {PT}=overline {PV}$ $$[Delta STP]=[Delta PVQ]$$
Now, back to the problem
Let $overline {AB}=a$ and $overline {IJ}=b$. Note first of all that $$Delta BEC cong Delta EIF$$
See why? $mathbf {Hint:}$
It is obvious that $overline {CE}=overline {EF}$. Use the properties of right triangles in order to show that all angles are equal.
Thus $${(overline{CE})^2}={a^2}+{b^2}=S$$
Note furthermore that $$[Delta BEC]=[Delta EIF]=frac{ab}{2}$$
By Lemma 1:
$$[Delta DCG]=[Delta BEC]=frac{ab}{2}=[Delta EIF]=[Delta GFK]$$
The area of the polygon AJKGD is thus
$$[AJKGD]=[ABCD]+[CEFG]+[FIJK]+4[Delta DCG]=2Bigl({a^2}+{b^2}Bigr)+2ab$$
The area of the trapezoid AJKD is moreover
$$[AJKD]=frac{(a+b)(2a+2b)}{2}={a^2}+2ab+{b^2}$$
Finally
$$T=[Delta DKG]=[AJKGD]-[AJKD]={a^2}+{b^2}=S Rightarrow S=T$$
We will, first of all, prove a very interesting property
$mathbf{Lemma;1}$
Given two squares PQRS and PTUV (as shown on the picture), the triangles $Delta STP$ and $Delta PVQ$ have equal area.
$mathbf {Proof}$
Denote by $alpha$ the angle SPT and by $[...]$ the area of the polygon "...". Hence
$$[Delta STP]=frac{overline {PS}*overline {PT}*sin(alpha)}{2}$$ $$[Delta PVQ]=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}*sinBigl(360°-(90°+90+alpha)Bigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}*sinBigl(180°-alphaBigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}*sin(alpha)}{2}$$
Since $overline {PS}=overline {PQ}$ and $overline {PT}=overline {PV}$ $$[Delta STP]=[Delta PVQ]$$
Now, back to the problem
Let $overline {AB}=a$ and $overline {IJ}=b$. Note first of all that $$Delta BEC cong Delta EIF$$
See why? $mathbf {Hint:}$
It is obvious that $overline {CE}=overline {EF}$. Use the properties of right triangles in order to show that all angles are equal.
Thus $${(overline{CE})^2}={a^2}+{b^2}=S$$
Note furthermore that $$[Delta BEC]=[Delta EIF]=frac{ab}{2}$$
By Lemma 1:
$$[Delta DCG]=[Delta BEC]=frac{ab}{2}=[Delta EIF]=[Delta GFK]$$
The area of the polygon AJKGD is thus
$$[AJKGD]=[ABCD]+[CEFG]+[FIJK]+4[Delta DCG]=2Bigl({a^2}+{b^2}Bigr)+2ab$$
The area of the trapezoid AJKD is moreover
$$[AJKD]=frac{(a+b)(2a+2b)}{2}={a^2}+2ab+{b^2}$$
Finally
$$T=[Delta DKG]=[AJKGD]-[AJKD]={a^2}+{b^2}=S Rightarrow S=T$$
answered 9 hours ago
Dr. Mathva
2157
2157
1
Nice. Maybe one can simplify the proof of the Lemma. Rotate $QPV$ by $pi/2$ clokwise around $P$; you get a triangle with the same basis and same heigth as $PST$.
– D. Thomine
9 hours ago
2
+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer, but I learned a lot from this and wish I could have come up with it myself.
– J.G.
8 hours ago
@Dr. Mathva: Thank you so much for your answer!
– Larry
8 hours ago
"+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer" - that's a bit unpleasant
– Mitch Wheat
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1
Nice. Maybe one can simplify the proof of the Lemma. Rotate $QPV$ by $pi/2$ clokwise around $P$; you get a triangle with the same basis and same heigth as $PST$.
– D. Thomine
9 hours ago
2
+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer, but I learned a lot from this and wish I could have come up with it myself.
– J.G.
8 hours ago
@Dr. Mathva: Thank you so much for your answer!
– Larry
8 hours ago
"+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer" - that's a bit unpleasant
– Mitch Wheat
1 hour ago
1
1
Nice. Maybe one can simplify the proof of the Lemma. Rotate $QPV$ by $pi/2$ clokwise around $P$; you get a triangle with the same basis and same heigth as $PST$.
– D. Thomine
9 hours ago
Nice. Maybe one can simplify the proof of the Lemma. Rotate $QPV$ by $pi/2$ clokwise around $P$; you get a triangle with the same basis and same heigth as $PST$.
– D. Thomine
9 hours ago
2
2
+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer, but I learned a lot from this and wish I could have come up with it myself.
– J.G.
8 hours ago
+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer, but I learned a lot from this and wish I could have come up with it myself.
– J.G.
8 hours ago
@Dr. Mathva: Thank you so much for your answer!
– Larry
8 hours ago
@Dr. Mathva: Thank you so much for your answer!
– Larry
8 hours ago
"+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer" - that's a bit unpleasant
– Mitch Wheat
1 hour ago
"+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer" - that's a bit unpleasant
– Mitch Wheat
1 hour ago
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
$$|square P_1 P_2 P_3 P_4| = (a+b)^2 = frac12(a+b)(2a+2b) = |square Q_1 Q_2 Q_3 Q_4|quad=:R$$
$$S ;=; R - 4cdotfrac12ab ;=; T$$
(This space intentionally left blank.)
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
$$|square P_1 P_2 P_3 P_4| = (a+b)^2 = frac12(a+b)(2a+2b) = |square Q_1 Q_2 Q_3 Q_4|quad=:R$$
$$S ;=; R - 4cdotfrac12ab ;=; T$$
(This space intentionally left blank.)
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
$$|square P_1 P_2 P_3 P_4| = (a+b)^2 = frac12(a+b)(2a+2b) = |square Q_1 Q_2 Q_3 Q_4|quad=:R$$
$$S ;=; R - 4cdotfrac12ab ;=; T$$
(This space intentionally left blank.)
$$|square P_1 P_2 P_3 P_4| = (a+b)^2 = frac12(a+b)(2a+2b) = |square Q_1 Q_2 Q_3 Q_4|quad=:R$$
$$S ;=; R - 4cdotfrac12ab ;=; T$$
(This space intentionally left blank.)
edited 58 mins ago
answered 3 hours ago
Blue
46.3k869146
46.3k869146
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
This is a long comment.
The shapes $S,,T$ share a vertex $A$ where six angles meet, three of them right angles. The other three angles therefore sum to a right angle. Let $theta$ be the angle in $T$, so the two other acute angles, and the right angle between them from $S$, sum to $pi-theta$. Since $sintheta=sin(pi-theta)$, $T$ has the same area as $triangle ABC$, where $BA,,AC$ are sides of the upper squares.
The challenge, then, is to show $S$ has that much area too. Let $D$ denote the vertex of $S$ opposite $A$. I suspect we can show the quadrilateral $BACD$ has twice the area of $S$, and also twice the area of $triangle ABC$.
I don't think that $BACD$ has twice the area of $ABC$. If you try to move $ABC$ by shearing to get a triangle with side $BC$ and something on the bottom line, the third point isn't $D$.
– D. Thomine
9 hours ago
$BACD$ is a rhombus because its opposite sides are parallel. So it does have twice the area of $ABC$.
– I like Serena
9 hours ago
$BACD$ is not a rhombus.
– D. Thomine
9 hours ago
Sorry, I meant parallellogram @D.Thomine.
– I like Serena
9 hours ago
Not a parallelogram either.
– D. Thomine
9 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
2
down vote
This is a long comment.
The shapes $S,,T$ share a vertex $A$ where six angles meet, three of them right angles. The other three angles therefore sum to a right angle. Let $theta$ be the angle in $T$, so the two other acute angles, and the right angle between them from $S$, sum to $pi-theta$. Since $sintheta=sin(pi-theta)$, $T$ has the same area as $triangle ABC$, where $BA,,AC$ are sides of the upper squares.
The challenge, then, is to show $S$ has that much area too. Let $D$ denote the vertex of $S$ opposite $A$. I suspect we can show the quadrilateral $BACD$ has twice the area of $S$, and also twice the area of $triangle ABC$.
I don't think that $BACD$ has twice the area of $ABC$. If you try to move $ABC$ by shearing to get a triangle with side $BC$ and something on the bottom line, the third point isn't $D$.
– D. Thomine
9 hours ago
$BACD$ is a rhombus because its opposite sides are parallel. So it does have twice the area of $ABC$.
– I like Serena
9 hours ago
$BACD$ is not a rhombus.
– D. Thomine
9 hours ago
Sorry, I meant parallellogram @D.Thomine.
– I like Serena
9 hours ago
Not a parallelogram either.
– D. Thomine
9 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
This is a long comment.
The shapes $S,,T$ share a vertex $A$ where six angles meet, three of them right angles. The other three angles therefore sum to a right angle. Let $theta$ be the angle in $T$, so the two other acute angles, and the right angle between them from $S$, sum to $pi-theta$. Since $sintheta=sin(pi-theta)$, $T$ has the same area as $triangle ABC$, where $BA,,AC$ are sides of the upper squares.
The challenge, then, is to show $S$ has that much area too. Let $D$ denote the vertex of $S$ opposite $A$. I suspect we can show the quadrilateral $BACD$ has twice the area of $S$, and also twice the area of $triangle ABC$.
This is a long comment.
The shapes $S,,T$ share a vertex $A$ where six angles meet, three of them right angles. The other three angles therefore sum to a right angle. Let $theta$ be the angle in $T$, so the two other acute angles, and the right angle between them from $S$, sum to $pi-theta$. Since $sintheta=sin(pi-theta)$, $T$ has the same area as $triangle ABC$, where $BA,,AC$ are sides of the upper squares.
The challenge, then, is to show $S$ has that much area too. Let $D$ denote the vertex of $S$ opposite $A$. I suspect we can show the quadrilateral $BACD$ has twice the area of $S$, and also twice the area of $triangle ABC$.
answered 9 hours ago
J.G.
18.5k21932
18.5k21932
I don't think that $BACD$ has twice the area of $ABC$. If you try to move $ABC$ by shearing to get a triangle with side $BC$ and something on the bottom line, the third point isn't $D$.
– D. Thomine
9 hours ago
$BACD$ is a rhombus because its opposite sides are parallel. So it does have twice the area of $ABC$.
– I like Serena
9 hours ago
$BACD$ is not a rhombus.
– D. Thomine
9 hours ago
Sorry, I meant parallellogram @D.Thomine.
– I like Serena
9 hours ago
Not a parallelogram either.
– D. Thomine
9 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
I don't think that $BACD$ has twice the area of $ABC$. If you try to move $ABC$ by shearing to get a triangle with side $BC$ and something on the bottom line, the third point isn't $D$.
– D. Thomine
9 hours ago
$BACD$ is a rhombus because its opposite sides are parallel. So it does have twice the area of $ABC$.
– I like Serena
9 hours ago
$BACD$ is not a rhombus.
– D. Thomine
9 hours ago
Sorry, I meant parallellogram @D.Thomine.
– I like Serena
9 hours ago
Not a parallelogram either.
– D. Thomine
9 hours ago
I don't think that $BACD$ has twice the area of $ABC$. If you try to move $ABC$ by shearing to get a triangle with side $BC$ and something on the bottom line, the third point isn't $D$.
– D. Thomine
9 hours ago
I don't think that $BACD$ has twice the area of $ABC$. If you try to move $ABC$ by shearing to get a triangle with side $BC$ and something on the bottom line, the third point isn't $D$.
– D. Thomine
9 hours ago
$BACD$ is a rhombus because its opposite sides are parallel. So it does have twice the area of $ABC$.
– I like Serena
9 hours ago
$BACD$ is a rhombus because its opposite sides are parallel. So it does have twice the area of $ABC$.
– I like Serena
9 hours ago
$BACD$ is not a rhombus.
– D. Thomine
9 hours ago
$BACD$ is not a rhombus.
– D. Thomine
9 hours ago
Sorry, I meant parallellogram @D.Thomine.
– I like Serena
9 hours ago
Sorry, I meant parallellogram @D.Thomine.
– I like Serena
9 hours ago
Not a parallelogram either.
– D. Thomine
9 hours ago
Not a parallelogram either.
– D. Thomine
9 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009635%2fjapanese-temple-problem-from-1844%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown