In AN 4.171, what is “reincarnation where the intention of others is effective”?











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Bhikkhu Sujato's translation of AN 4.171 says:




Mendicants, there are four kinds of reincarnation. Cattārome,
bhikkhave, attabhāvapaṭilābhā.



What four? Katame cattāro?



There is a reincarnation where one’s own intention is effective, not
that of others. Atthi, bhikkhave, attabhāvapaṭilābho, yasmiṃ
attabhāvapaṭilābhe attasañcetanā kamati, no parasañcetanā.



There is a reincarnation where the intention of others is effective,
not one’s own. Atthi, bhikkhave, attabhāvapaṭilābho, yasmiṃ
attabhāvapaṭilābhe parasañcetanā kamati, no attasañcetanā.



There is a reincarnation where both one’s own and others’ intentions
are effective. Atthi, bhikkhave, attabhāvapaṭilābho, yasmiṃ
attabhāvapaṭilābhe attasañcetanā ca kamati parasañcetanā ca.



There is a reincarnation where neither one’s own nor others’
intentions are effective. Atthi, bhikkhave, attabhāvapaṭilābho, yasmiṃ
attabhāvapaṭilābhe nevattasañcetanā kamati, no parasañcetanā.



These are the four kinds of reincarnation.” Ime kho, bhikkhave,
cattāro attabhāvapaṭilābhā”ti.




What is "reincarnation where the intention of others is effective"?










share|improve this question




























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    Bhikkhu Sujato's translation of AN 4.171 says:




    Mendicants, there are four kinds of reincarnation. Cattārome,
    bhikkhave, attabhāvapaṭilābhā.



    What four? Katame cattāro?



    There is a reincarnation where one’s own intention is effective, not
    that of others. Atthi, bhikkhave, attabhāvapaṭilābho, yasmiṃ
    attabhāvapaṭilābhe attasañcetanā kamati, no parasañcetanā.



    There is a reincarnation where the intention of others is effective,
    not one’s own. Atthi, bhikkhave, attabhāvapaṭilābho, yasmiṃ
    attabhāvapaṭilābhe parasañcetanā kamati, no attasañcetanā.



    There is a reincarnation where both one’s own and others’ intentions
    are effective. Atthi, bhikkhave, attabhāvapaṭilābho, yasmiṃ
    attabhāvapaṭilābhe attasañcetanā ca kamati parasañcetanā ca.



    There is a reincarnation where neither one’s own nor others’
    intentions are effective. Atthi, bhikkhave, attabhāvapaṭilābho, yasmiṃ
    attabhāvapaṭilābhe nevattasañcetanā kamati, no parasañcetanā.



    These are the four kinds of reincarnation.” Ime kho, bhikkhave,
    cattāro attabhāvapaṭilābhā”ti.




    What is "reincarnation where the intention of others is effective"?










    share|improve this question


























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      Bhikkhu Sujato's translation of AN 4.171 says:




      Mendicants, there are four kinds of reincarnation. Cattārome,
      bhikkhave, attabhāvapaṭilābhā.



      What four? Katame cattāro?



      There is a reincarnation where one’s own intention is effective, not
      that of others. Atthi, bhikkhave, attabhāvapaṭilābho, yasmiṃ
      attabhāvapaṭilābhe attasañcetanā kamati, no parasañcetanā.



      There is a reincarnation where the intention of others is effective,
      not one’s own. Atthi, bhikkhave, attabhāvapaṭilābho, yasmiṃ
      attabhāvapaṭilābhe parasañcetanā kamati, no attasañcetanā.



      There is a reincarnation where both one’s own and others’ intentions
      are effective. Atthi, bhikkhave, attabhāvapaṭilābho, yasmiṃ
      attabhāvapaṭilābhe attasañcetanā ca kamati parasañcetanā ca.



      There is a reincarnation where neither one’s own nor others’
      intentions are effective. Atthi, bhikkhave, attabhāvapaṭilābho, yasmiṃ
      attabhāvapaṭilābhe nevattasañcetanā kamati, no parasañcetanā.



      These are the four kinds of reincarnation.” Ime kho, bhikkhave,
      cattāro attabhāvapaṭilābhā”ti.




      What is "reincarnation where the intention of others is effective"?










      share|improve this question















      Bhikkhu Sujato's translation of AN 4.171 says:




      Mendicants, there are four kinds of reincarnation. Cattārome,
      bhikkhave, attabhāvapaṭilābhā.



      What four? Katame cattāro?



      There is a reincarnation where one’s own intention is effective, not
      that of others. Atthi, bhikkhave, attabhāvapaṭilābho, yasmiṃ
      attabhāvapaṭilābhe attasañcetanā kamati, no parasañcetanā.



      There is a reincarnation where the intention of others is effective,
      not one’s own. Atthi, bhikkhave, attabhāvapaṭilābho, yasmiṃ
      attabhāvapaṭilābhe parasañcetanā kamati, no attasañcetanā.



      There is a reincarnation where both one’s own and others’ intentions
      are effective. Atthi, bhikkhave, attabhāvapaṭilābho, yasmiṃ
      attabhāvapaṭilābhe attasañcetanā ca kamati parasañcetanā ca.



      There is a reincarnation where neither one’s own nor others’
      intentions are effective. Atthi, bhikkhave, attabhāvapaṭilābho, yasmiṃ
      attabhāvapaṭilābhe nevattasañcetanā kamati, no parasañcetanā.



      These are the four kinds of reincarnation.” Ime kho, bhikkhave,
      cattāro attabhāvapaṭilābhā”ti.




      What is "reincarnation where the intention of others is effective"?







      pali-canon






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 3 hours ago

























      asked 5 hours ago









      Dhammadhatu

      24k11043




      24k11043






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          Perhaps this is what refers to in Abhidhamma as prompted and unprompted.
          For instance, a person can kill someone with his own intention or intention of another person (prompted by someone else). One can influence another to kill.
          I may be wrong.






          share|improve this answer




























            up vote
            1
            down vote














            Per the commentary, this passage refers to devas corrupted by the mind (Manopadosika-deva), living in the world of the Four Great Kings. When they get angry with one another their mutual anger leads to their mutual deaths.




            .




            Manopadosika-deva: 'the celestial beings corruptible by temper', are a class of devas of the sense-sphere. They spend their time in becoming annoyed with one another, and getting into a temper, and thus by being bodily and mentally exhausted, they pass from that world.




            .




            A class of devas living in the Catummaharajika world. They burn continually with envy one against another and their hearts become ill disposed and debauched. Their bodies thus become feeble and their minds imbecile, and, as a consequence, they fall from their state.




            .




            There are, bhikkhus, certain gods called ‘corrupted by mind.’ These gods contemplate one another with excessive envy. As a consequence their minds becomes corrupted by anger towards one another. When their minds are corrupted by anger, their bodies and minds become exhausted and consequently, they pass away from that plane.




            .




            There are gods named ‘malevolent’. They spend too much time gazing at each other, so they grow angry with each other, and their bodies and minds get tired. They pass away from that group of gods.




            So, one deva's hatred towards another deva provokes hatred in that deva towards the first, causing a vicious circle, and this very hatred exhausts their spirits until they fall from their godly state.



            One deva's hatred is not his own deliberate intention but is merely a reaction to another deva's hatred. Therefore the deva falls from his state and comes to a different state through an "intention of other".



            It's interesting how the vicious circle of judgement starts not through one of the devas performing some unwelcomed act to another, but rather through both spending too much time wondering about the other's attitude to oneself.



            I suppose this basically means that not all karma is strictly personal. While in the simplest cases sentient beings inherit their own karma, there are cases when they create (bad) karma for one another, and there are cases when a karmic pattern emerges spontaneously from a background of ignorance - not through anyone's fault.






            share|improve this answer























              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "565"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbuddhism.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f30149%2fin-an-4-171-what-is-reincarnation-where-the-intention-of-others-is-effective%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              1
              down vote













              Perhaps this is what refers to in Abhidhamma as prompted and unprompted.
              For instance, a person can kill someone with his own intention or intention of another person (prompted by someone else). One can influence another to kill.
              I may be wrong.






              share|improve this answer

























                up vote
                1
                down vote













                Perhaps this is what refers to in Abhidhamma as prompted and unprompted.
                For instance, a person can kill someone with his own intention or intention of another person (prompted by someone else). One can influence another to kill.
                I may be wrong.






                share|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote









                  Perhaps this is what refers to in Abhidhamma as prompted and unprompted.
                  For instance, a person can kill someone with his own intention or intention of another person (prompted by someone else). One can influence another to kill.
                  I may be wrong.






                  share|improve this answer












                  Perhaps this is what refers to in Abhidhamma as prompted and unprompted.
                  For instance, a person can kill someone with his own intention or intention of another person (prompted by someone else). One can influence another to kill.
                  I may be wrong.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 1 hour ago









                  SarathW

                  2,308212




                  2,308212






















                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote














                      Per the commentary, this passage refers to devas corrupted by the mind (Manopadosika-deva), living in the world of the Four Great Kings. When they get angry with one another their mutual anger leads to their mutual deaths.




                      .




                      Manopadosika-deva: 'the celestial beings corruptible by temper', are a class of devas of the sense-sphere. They spend their time in becoming annoyed with one another, and getting into a temper, and thus by being bodily and mentally exhausted, they pass from that world.




                      .




                      A class of devas living in the Catummaharajika world. They burn continually with envy one against another and their hearts become ill disposed and debauched. Their bodies thus become feeble and their minds imbecile, and, as a consequence, they fall from their state.




                      .




                      There are, bhikkhus, certain gods called ‘corrupted by mind.’ These gods contemplate one another with excessive envy. As a consequence their minds becomes corrupted by anger towards one another. When their minds are corrupted by anger, their bodies and minds become exhausted and consequently, they pass away from that plane.




                      .




                      There are gods named ‘malevolent’. They spend too much time gazing at each other, so they grow angry with each other, and their bodies and minds get tired. They pass away from that group of gods.




                      So, one deva's hatred towards another deva provokes hatred in that deva towards the first, causing a vicious circle, and this very hatred exhausts their spirits until they fall from their godly state.



                      One deva's hatred is not his own deliberate intention but is merely a reaction to another deva's hatred. Therefore the deva falls from his state and comes to a different state through an "intention of other".



                      It's interesting how the vicious circle of judgement starts not through one of the devas performing some unwelcomed act to another, but rather through both spending too much time wondering about the other's attitude to oneself.



                      I suppose this basically means that not all karma is strictly personal. While in the simplest cases sentient beings inherit their own karma, there are cases when they create (bad) karma for one another, and there are cases when a karmic pattern emerges spontaneously from a background of ignorance - not through anyone's fault.






                      share|improve this answer



























                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote














                        Per the commentary, this passage refers to devas corrupted by the mind (Manopadosika-deva), living in the world of the Four Great Kings. When they get angry with one another their mutual anger leads to their mutual deaths.




                        .




                        Manopadosika-deva: 'the celestial beings corruptible by temper', are a class of devas of the sense-sphere. They spend their time in becoming annoyed with one another, and getting into a temper, and thus by being bodily and mentally exhausted, they pass from that world.




                        .




                        A class of devas living in the Catummaharajika world. They burn continually with envy one against another and their hearts become ill disposed and debauched. Their bodies thus become feeble and their minds imbecile, and, as a consequence, they fall from their state.




                        .




                        There are, bhikkhus, certain gods called ‘corrupted by mind.’ These gods contemplate one another with excessive envy. As a consequence their minds becomes corrupted by anger towards one another. When their minds are corrupted by anger, their bodies and minds become exhausted and consequently, they pass away from that plane.




                        .




                        There are gods named ‘malevolent’. They spend too much time gazing at each other, so they grow angry with each other, and their bodies and minds get tired. They pass away from that group of gods.




                        So, one deva's hatred towards another deva provokes hatred in that deva towards the first, causing a vicious circle, and this very hatred exhausts their spirits until they fall from their godly state.



                        One deva's hatred is not his own deliberate intention but is merely a reaction to another deva's hatred. Therefore the deva falls from his state and comes to a different state through an "intention of other".



                        It's interesting how the vicious circle of judgement starts not through one of the devas performing some unwelcomed act to another, but rather through both spending too much time wondering about the other's attitude to oneself.



                        I suppose this basically means that not all karma is strictly personal. While in the simplest cases sentient beings inherit their own karma, there are cases when they create (bad) karma for one another, and there are cases when a karmic pattern emerges spontaneously from a background of ignorance - not through anyone's fault.






                        share|improve this answer

























                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote










                          Per the commentary, this passage refers to devas corrupted by the mind (Manopadosika-deva), living in the world of the Four Great Kings. When they get angry with one another their mutual anger leads to their mutual deaths.




                          .




                          Manopadosika-deva: 'the celestial beings corruptible by temper', are a class of devas of the sense-sphere. They spend their time in becoming annoyed with one another, and getting into a temper, and thus by being bodily and mentally exhausted, they pass from that world.




                          .




                          A class of devas living in the Catummaharajika world. They burn continually with envy one against another and their hearts become ill disposed and debauched. Their bodies thus become feeble and their minds imbecile, and, as a consequence, they fall from their state.




                          .




                          There are, bhikkhus, certain gods called ‘corrupted by mind.’ These gods contemplate one another with excessive envy. As a consequence their minds becomes corrupted by anger towards one another. When their minds are corrupted by anger, their bodies and minds become exhausted and consequently, they pass away from that plane.




                          .




                          There are gods named ‘malevolent’. They spend too much time gazing at each other, so they grow angry with each other, and their bodies and minds get tired. They pass away from that group of gods.




                          So, one deva's hatred towards another deva provokes hatred in that deva towards the first, causing a vicious circle, and this very hatred exhausts their spirits until they fall from their godly state.



                          One deva's hatred is not his own deliberate intention but is merely a reaction to another deva's hatred. Therefore the deva falls from his state and comes to a different state through an "intention of other".



                          It's interesting how the vicious circle of judgement starts not through one of the devas performing some unwelcomed act to another, but rather through both spending too much time wondering about the other's attitude to oneself.



                          I suppose this basically means that not all karma is strictly personal. While in the simplest cases sentient beings inherit their own karma, there are cases when they create (bad) karma for one another, and there are cases when a karmic pattern emerges spontaneously from a background of ignorance - not through anyone's fault.






                          share|improve this answer















                          Per the commentary, this passage refers to devas corrupted by the mind (Manopadosika-deva), living in the world of the Four Great Kings. When they get angry with one another their mutual anger leads to their mutual deaths.




                          .




                          Manopadosika-deva: 'the celestial beings corruptible by temper', are a class of devas of the sense-sphere. They spend their time in becoming annoyed with one another, and getting into a temper, and thus by being bodily and mentally exhausted, they pass from that world.




                          .




                          A class of devas living in the Catummaharajika world. They burn continually with envy one against another and their hearts become ill disposed and debauched. Their bodies thus become feeble and their minds imbecile, and, as a consequence, they fall from their state.




                          .




                          There are, bhikkhus, certain gods called ‘corrupted by mind.’ These gods contemplate one another with excessive envy. As a consequence their minds becomes corrupted by anger towards one another. When their minds are corrupted by anger, their bodies and minds become exhausted and consequently, they pass away from that plane.




                          .




                          There are gods named ‘malevolent’. They spend too much time gazing at each other, so they grow angry with each other, and their bodies and minds get tired. They pass away from that group of gods.




                          So, one deva's hatred towards another deva provokes hatred in that deva towards the first, causing a vicious circle, and this very hatred exhausts their spirits until they fall from their godly state.



                          One deva's hatred is not his own deliberate intention but is merely a reaction to another deva's hatred. Therefore the deva falls from his state and comes to a different state through an "intention of other".



                          It's interesting how the vicious circle of judgement starts not through one of the devas performing some unwelcomed act to another, but rather through both spending too much time wondering about the other's attitude to oneself.



                          I suppose this basically means that not all karma is strictly personal. While in the simplest cases sentient beings inherit their own karma, there are cases when they create (bad) karma for one another, and there are cases when a karmic pattern emerges spontaneously from a background of ignorance - not through anyone's fault.







                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited 4 mins ago

























                          answered 51 mins ago









                          Andrei Volkov

                          36.9k330107




                          36.9k330107






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Buddhism Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                              Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                              Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbuddhism.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f30149%2fin-an-4-171-what-is-reincarnation-where-the-intention-of-others-is-effective%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Costa Masnaga

                              Fotorealismo

                              Sidney Franklin