Why is the default value 0x1000 instead of 0x200?
Attachment
From the manual , in Bits 12-8 , the default value is 0x10 , meaning that only Bit 9 is 1.
From the calculator it shows b10 0000 0000 = 0x200
. But why does the document say its 0x1000
instead?
binary
add a comment |
Attachment
From the manual , in Bits 12-8 , the default value is 0x10 , meaning that only Bit 9 is 1.
From the calculator it shows b10 0000 0000 = 0x200
. But why does the document say its 0x1000
instead?
binary
add a comment |
Attachment
From the manual , in Bits 12-8 , the default value is 0x10 , meaning that only Bit 9 is 1.
From the calculator it shows b10 0000 0000 = 0x200
. But why does the document say its 0x1000
instead?
binary
Attachment
From the manual , in Bits 12-8 , the default value is 0x10 , meaning that only Bit 9 is 1.
From the calculator it shows b10 0000 0000 = 0x200
. But why does the document say its 0x1000
instead?
binary
binary
asked Nov 20 at 16:32
Arkyo
177
177
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Each hexadecimal digit corresponds to 4 bits (a.k.a. a nibble). In the number 0x10, only bit 5 is 1.
The correct conversion is this:
0x10 --> 1 0
0001 0000 --> 0b10000
Thanks , but I wonder why developers don't specify it as a default value of '10000' instead
– Arkyo
Nov 21 at 7:47
@Arkyo The number can be written as "binary 10000" or "decimal 16" or "octal 20" or "hexadecimal 10"... They're all equally valid. ¯_(ツ)_/¯ The documentation author chose hexadecimal.
– Pedro LM
Nov 21 at 9:47
yeah I know , that's why I wonder why don't the author use binary? We are talking about bits , doesn't binary representation makes more sense?
– Arkyo
Nov 21 at 14:24
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53397443%2fwhy-is-the-default-value-0x1000-instead-of-0x200%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Each hexadecimal digit corresponds to 4 bits (a.k.a. a nibble). In the number 0x10, only bit 5 is 1.
The correct conversion is this:
0x10 --> 1 0
0001 0000 --> 0b10000
Thanks , but I wonder why developers don't specify it as a default value of '10000' instead
– Arkyo
Nov 21 at 7:47
@Arkyo The number can be written as "binary 10000" or "decimal 16" or "octal 20" or "hexadecimal 10"... They're all equally valid. ¯_(ツ)_/¯ The documentation author chose hexadecimal.
– Pedro LM
Nov 21 at 9:47
yeah I know , that's why I wonder why don't the author use binary? We are talking about bits , doesn't binary representation makes more sense?
– Arkyo
Nov 21 at 14:24
add a comment |
Each hexadecimal digit corresponds to 4 bits (a.k.a. a nibble). In the number 0x10, only bit 5 is 1.
The correct conversion is this:
0x10 --> 1 0
0001 0000 --> 0b10000
Thanks , but I wonder why developers don't specify it as a default value of '10000' instead
– Arkyo
Nov 21 at 7:47
@Arkyo The number can be written as "binary 10000" or "decimal 16" or "octal 20" or "hexadecimal 10"... They're all equally valid. ¯_(ツ)_/¯ The documentation author chose hexadecimal.
– Pedro LM
Nov 21 at 9:47
yeah I know , that's why I wonder why don't the author use binary? We are talking about bits , doesn't binary representation makes more sense?
– Arkyo
Nov 21 at 14:24
add a comment |
Each hexadecimal digit corresponds to 4 bits (a.k.a. a nibble). In the number 0x10, only bit 5 is 1.
The correct conversion is this:
0x10 --> 1 0
0001 0000 --> 0b10000
Each hexadecimal digit corresponds to 4 bits (a.k.a. a nibble). In the number 0x10, only bit 5 is 1.
The correct conversion is this:
0x10 --> 1 0
0001 0000 --> 0b10000
answered Nov 20 at 16:49
Pedro LM
43727
43727
Thanks , but I wonder why developers don't specify it as a default value of '10000' instead
– Arkyo
Nov 21 at 7:47
@Arkyo The number can be written as "binary 10000" or "decimal 16" or "octal 20" or "hexadecimal 10"... They're all equally valid. ¯_(ツ)_/¯ The documentation author chose hexadecimal.
– Pedro LM
Nov 21 at 9:47
yeah I know , that's why I wonder why don't the author use binary? We are talking about bits , doesn't binary representation makes more sense?
– Arkyo
Nov 21 at 14:24
add a comment |
Thanks , but I wonder why developers don't specify it as a default value of '10000' instead
– Arkyo
Nov 21 at 7:47
@Arkyo The number can be written as "binary 10000" or "decimal 16" or "octal 20" or "hexadecimal 10"... They're all equally valid. ¯_(ツ)_/¯ The documentation author chose hexadecimal.
– Pedro LM
Nov 21 at 9:47
yeah I know , that's why I wonder why don't the author use binary? We are talking about bits , doesn't binary representation makes more sense?
– Arkyo
Nov 21 at 14:24
Thanks , but I wonder why developers don't specify it as a default value of '10000' instead
– Arkyo
Nov 21 at 7:47
Thanks , but I wonder why developers don't specify it as a default value of '10000' instead
– Arkyo
Nov 21 at 7:47
@Arkyo The number can be written as "binary 10000" or "decimal 16" or "octal 20" or "hexadecimal 10"... They're all equally valid. ¯_(ツ)_/¯ The documentation author chose hexadecimal.
– Pedro LM
Nov 21 at 9:47
@Arkyo The number can be written as "binary 10000" or "decimal 16" or "octal 20" or "hexadecimal 10"... They're all equally valid. ¯_(ツ)_/¯ The documentation author chose hexadecimal.
– Pedro LM
Nov 21 at 9:47
yeah I know , that's why I wonder why don't the author use binary? We are talking about bits , doesn't binary representation makes more sense?
– Arkyo
Nov 21 at 14:24
yeah I know , that's why I wonder why don't the author use binary? We are talking about bits , doesn't binary representation makes more sense?
– Arkyo
Nov 21 at 14:24
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53397443%2fwhy-is-the-default-value-0x1000-instead-of-0x200%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown