Zlib header not detected by offzip











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I'm looking into a file that contains some zlib compressed chunks, some are detected by Offzip as valid, one is not:



0x 78 01 F3 48 --valid and has a matching adler32 hash
0x 78 01 03 00 --invalid
0x 78 01 63 64 --valid not sure about the hash


I think it's only the first three bytes that indicate the compression method and flags, so I'm unsure as to why the second entry is not detected. It certainly looks like a zlib data block, but I'm a bit lost



Any input or advice would be greatly appreciated










share|improve this question




























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    I'm looking into a file that contains some zlib compressed chunks, some are detected by Offzip as valid, one is not:



    0x 78 01 F3 48 --valid and has a matching adler32 hash
    0x 78 01 03 00 --invalid
    0x 78 01 63 64 --valid not sure about the hash


    I think it's only the first three bytes that indicate the compression method and flags, so I'm unsure as to why the second entry is not detected. It certainly looks like a zlib data block, but I'm a bit lost



    Any input or advice would be greatly appreciated










    share|improve this question


























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      I'm looking into a file that contains some zlib compressed chunks, some are detected by Offzip as valid, one is not:



      0x 78 01 F3 48 --valid and has a matching adler32 hash
      0x 78 01 03 00 --invalid
      0x 78 01 63 64 --valid not sure about the hash


      I think it's only the first three bytes that indicate the compression method and flags, so I'm unsure as to why the second entry is not detected. It certainly looks like a zlib data block, but I'm a bit lost



      Any input or advice would be greatly appreciated










      share|improve this question















      I'm looking into a file that contains some zlib compressed chunks, some are detected by Offzip as valid, one is not:



      0x 78 01 F3 48 --valid and has a matching adler32 hash
      0x 78 01 03 00 --invalid
      0x 78 01 63 64 --valid not sure about the hash


      I think it's only the first three bytes that indicate the compression method and flags, so I'm unsure as to why the second entry is not detected. It certainly looks like a zlib data block, but I'm a bit lost



      Any input or advice would be greatly appreciated







      c# compression zlib dotnetzip






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 19 at 19:32

























      asked Nov 19 at 18:20









      Tony

      1,44552849




      1,44552849
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Those are all valid starts to zlib streams. Of course, none of them are valid entire zlib streams, since the minimum zlib stream length is eight bytes.



          The 78 01 03 00 has a valid zlib header, 78 01, and a valid and in fact complete deflate stream, 03 00. That is an empty fixed codes deflate block marked as the last block. If you follow that with 00 00 00 01 (the Adler-32 check value for zero bytes), then you have a complete and correct zlib stream.






          share|improve this answer





















          • Thanks for the info Mark. I am indeed seeing an empty and complete zlib stream. Is there a common use for empty streams like this? For use as a marker of some kind?
            – Tony
            Nov 20 at 7:54






          • 1




            I have no idea how common empty zlib streams are. However the tool clearly has a bug if it is marking that as not the start of a valid zlib stream.
            – Mark Adler
            Nov 20 at 15:33










          • Thanks Mark. Appreciate the information.
            – Tony
            Nov 21 at 13:30











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53380536%2fzlib-header-not-detected-by-offzip%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Those are all valid starts to zlib streams. Of course, none of them are valid entire zlib streams, since the minimum zlib stream length is eight bytes.



          The 78 01 03 00 has a valid zlib header, 78 01, and a valid and in fact complete deflate stream, 03 00. That is an empty fixed codes deflate block marked as the last block. If you follow that with 00 00 00 01 (the Adler-32 check value for zero bytes), then you have a complete and correct zlib stream.






          share|improve this answer





















          • Thanks for the info Mark. I am indeed seeing an empty and complete zlib stream. Is there a common use for empty streams like this? For use as a marker of some kind?
            – Tony
            Nov 20 at 7:54






          • 1




            I have no idea how common empty zlib streams are. However the tool clearly has a bug if it is marking that as not the start of a valid zlib stream.
            – Mark Adler
            Nov 20 at 15:33










          • Thanks Mark. Appreciate the information.
            – Tony
            Nov 21 at 13:30















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Those are all valid starts to zlib streams. Of course, none of them are valid entire zlib streams, since the minimum zlib stream length is eight bytes.



          The 78 01 03 00 has a valid zlib header, 78 01, and a valid and in fact complete deflate stream, 03 00. That is an empty fixed codes deflate block marked as the last block. If you follow that with 00 00 00 01 (the Adler-32 check value for zero bytes), then you have a complete and correct zlib stream.






          share|improve this answer





















          • Thanks for the info Mark. I am indeed seeing an empty and complete zlib stream. Is there a common use for empty streams like this? For use as a marker of some kind?
            – Tony
            Nov 20 at 7:54






          • 1




            I have no idea how common empty zlib streams are. However the tool clearly has a bug if it is marking that as not the start of a valid zlib stream.
            – Mark Adler
            Nov 20 at 15:33










          • Thanks Mark. Appreciate the information.
            – Tony
            Nov 21 at 13:30













          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted






          Those are all valid starts to zlib streams. Of course, none of them are valid entire zlib streams, since the minimum zlib stream length is eight bytes.



          The 78 01 03 00 has a valid zlib header, 78 01, and a valid and in fact complete deflate stream, 03 00. That is an empty fixed codes deflate block marked as the last block. If you follow that with 00 00 00 01 (the Adler-32 check value for zero bytes), then you have a complete and correct zlib stream.






          share|improve this answer












          Those are all valid starts to zlib streams. Of course, none of them are valid entire zlib streams, since the minimum zlib stream length is eight bytes.



          The 78 01 03 00 has a valid zlib header, 78 01, and a valid and in fact complete deflate stream, 03 00. That is an empty fixed codes deflate block marked as the last block. If you follow that with 00 00 00 01 (the Adler-32 check value for zero bytes), then you have a complete and correct zlib stream.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 20 at 2:15









          Mark Adler

          56.9k760107




          56.9k760107












          • Thanks for the info Mark. I am indeed seeing an empty and complete zlib stream. Is there a common use for empty streams like this? For use as a marker of some kind?
            – Tony
            Nov 20 at 7:54






          • 1




            I have no idea how common empty zlib streams are. However the tool clearly has a bug if it is marking that as not the start of a valid zlib stream.
            – Mark Adler
            Nov 20 at 15:33










          • Thanks Mark. Appreciate the information.
            – Tony
            Nov 21 at 13:30


















          • Thanks for the info Mark. I am indeed seeing an empty and complete zlib stream. Is there a common use for empty streams like this? For use as a marker of some kind?
            – Tony
            Nov 20 at 7:54






          • 1




            I have no idea how common empty zlib streams are. However the tool clearly has a bug if it is marking that as not the start of a valid zlib stream.
            – Mark Adler
            Nov 20 at 15:33










          • Thanks Mark. Appreciate the information.
            – Tony
            Nov 21 at 13:30
















          Thanks for the info Mark. I am indeed seeing an empty and complete zlib stream. Is there a common use for empty streams like this? For use as a marker of some kind?
          – Tony
          Nov 20 at 7:54




          Thanks for the info Mark. I am indeed seeing an empty and complete zlib stream. Is there a common use for empty streams like this? For use as a marker of some kind?
          – Tony
          Nov 20 at 7:54




          1




          1




          I have no idea how common empty zlib streams are. However the tool clearly has a bug if it is marking that as not the start of a valid zlib stream.
          – Mark Adler
          Nov 20 at 15:33




          I have no idea how common empty zlib streams are. However the tool clearly has a bug if it is marking that as not the start of a valid zlib stream.
          – Mark Adler
          Nov 20 at 15:33












          Thanks Mark. Appreciate the information.
          – Tony
          Nov 21 at 13:30




          Thanks Mark. Appreciate the information.
          – Tony
          Nov 21 at 13:30


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53380536%2fzlib-header-not-detected-by-offzip%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Costa Masnaga

          Fotorealismo

          Sidney Franklin