Isosceles triangle height












2














I was doing a problem in which I was told the lengths of all sides of an isosceles triangle and asked to find the area.



I solved the problem by dividing the isosceles triangle into two equal triangles to find the height which I used in the area formula for the original triangle.



Looking at the answer, my method resulted in the correct value but, it seems I could have used the legs of the isosceles triangle (both 8) as the base and height and skipped finding the height. Why does that shortcut work?
The question is below:



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Crt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 2




    That only works if the isosceles triangle is also a right angled triangle. I presume the third side was given to be $8sqrt 2$?
    – Deepak
    23 mins ago












  • Might be a coincidence of the mathematics but it's hard to say without knowing your work explicitly. Or as Deepak said, could be an isosceles right triangle. Could you edit your original post to include the original problem and how you worked it using your shortcut?
    – Eevee Trainer
    22 mins ago










  • Also, note that with the triangle lengths available, regardless of it being any specific type of triangle, you didn't need to determine the height. Instead, you could have directly solved the problem using these values in Heron's formula. I just saw you added the question itself. In your case, you could have also used the Pythagorean Theorem to determine the other side lengths, then getting the area using those $2$ values, with it being simpler in this case then Heron's formula.
    – John Omielan
    19 mins ago












  • @Deepak you were right. It makes sense once you recognize that the triangle is a right angle and it's drawn out. I can see the height is one of the legs. Thanks
    – Crt
    15 mins ago
















2














I was doing a problem in which I was told the lengths of all sides of an isosceles triangle and asked to find the area.



I solved the problem by dividing the isosceles triangle into two equal triangles to find the height which I used in the area formula for the original triangle.



Looking at the answer, my method resulted in the correct value but, it seems I could have used the legs of the isosceles triangle (both 8) as the base and height and skipped finding the height. Why does that shortcut work?
The question is below:



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Crt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 2




    That only works if the isosceles triangle is also a right angled triangle. I presume the third side was given to be $8sqrt 2$?
    – Deepak
    23 mins ago












  • Might be a coincidence of the mathematics but it's hard to say without knowing your work explicitly. Or as Deepak said, could be an isosceles right triangle. Could you edit your original post to include the original problem and how you worked it using your shortcut?
    – Eevee Trainer
    22 mins ago










  • Also, note that with the triangle lengths available, regardless of it being any specific type of triangle, you didn't need to determine the height. Instead, you could have directly solved the problem using these values in Heron's formula. I just saw you added the question itself. In your case, you could have also used the Pythagorean Theorem to determine the other side lengths, then getting the area using those $2$ values, with it being simpler in this case then Heron's formula.
    – John Omielan
    19 mins ago












  • @Deepak you were right. It makes sense once you recognize that the triangle is a right angle and it's drawn out. I can see the height is one of the legs. Thanks
    – Crt
    15 mins ago














2












2








2







I was doing a problem in which I was told the lengths of all sides of an isosceles triangle and asked to find the area.



I solved the problem by dividing the isosceles triangle into two equal triangles to find the height which I used in the area formula for the original triangle.



Looking at the answer, my method resulted in the correct value but, it seems I could have used the legs of the isosceles triangle (both 8) as the base and height and skipped finding the height. Why does that shortcut work?
The question is below:



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Crt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I was doing a problem in which I was told the lengths of all sides of an isosceles triangle and asked to find the area.



I solved the problem by dividing the isosceles triangle into two equal triangles to find the height which I used in the area formula for the original triangle.



Looking at the answer, my method resulted in the correct value but, it seems I could have used the legs of the isosceles triangle (both 8) as the base and height and skipped finding the height. Why does that shortcut work?
The question is below:



enter image description here







geometry triangle






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Crt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Crt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 19 mins ago





















New contributor




Crt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 30 mins ago









Crt

1155




1155




New contributor




Crt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Crt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Crt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 2




    That only works if the isosceles triangle is also a right angled triangle. I presume the third side was given to be $8sqrt 2$?
    – Deepak
    23 mins ago












  • Might be a coincidence of the mathematics but it's hard to say without knowing your work explicitly. Or as Deepak said, could be an isosceles right triangle. Could you edit your original post to include the original problem and how you worked it using your shortcut?
    – Eevee Trainer
    22 mins ago










  • Also, note that with the triangle lengths available, regardless of it being any specific type of triangle, you didn't need to determine the height. Instead, you could have directly solved the problem using these values in Heron's formula. I just saw you added the question itself. In your case, you could have also used the Pythagorean Theorem to determine the other side lengths, then getting the area using those $2$ values, with it being simpler in this case then Heron's formula.
    – John Omielan
    19 mins ago












  • @Deepak you were right. It makes sense once you recognize that the triangle is a right angle and it's drawn out. I can see the height is one of the legs. Thanks
    – Crt
    15 mins ago














  • 2




    That only works if the isosceles triangle is also a right angled triangle. I presume the third side was given to be $8sqrt 2$?
    – Deepak
    23 mins ago












  • Might be a coincidence of the mathematics but it's hard to say without knowing your work explicitly. Or as Deepak said, could be an isosceles right triangle. Could you edit your original post to include the original problem and how you worked it using your shortcut?
    – Eevee Trainer
    22 mins ago










  • Also, note that with the triangle lengths available, regardless of it being any specific type of triangle, you didn't need to determine the height. Instead, you could have directly solved the problem using these values in Heron's formula. I just saw you added the question itself. In your case, you could have also used the Pythagorean Theorem to determine the other side lengths, then getting the area using those $2$ values, with it being simpler in this case then Heron's formula.
    – John Omielan
    19 mins ago












  • @Deepak you were right. It makes sense once you recognize that the triangle is a right angle and it's drawn out. I can see the height is one of the legs. Thanks
    – Crt
    15 mins ago








2




2




That only works if the isosceles triangle is also a right angled triangle. I presume the third side was given to be $8sqrt 2$?
– Deepak
23 mins ago






That only works if the isosceles triangle is also a right angled triangle. I presume the third side was given to be $8sqrt 2$?
– Deepak
23 mins ago














Might be a coincidence of the mathematics but it's hard to say without knowing your work explicitly. Or as Deepak said, could be an isosceles right triangle. Could you edit your original post to include the original problem and how you worked it using your shortcut?
– Eevee Trainer
22 mins ago




Might be a coincidence of the mathematics but it's hard to say without knowing your work explicitly. Or as Deepak said, could be an isosceles right triangle. Could you edit your original post to include the original problem and how you worked it using your shortcut?
– Eevee Trainer
22 mins ago












Also, note that with the triangle lengths available, regardless of it being any specific type of triangle, you didn't need to determine the height. Instead, you could have directly solved the problem using these values in Heron's formula. I just saw you added the question itself. In your case, you could have also used the Pythagorean Theorem to determine the other side lengths, then getting the area using those $2$ values, with it being simpler in this case then Heron's formula.
– John Omielan
19 mins ago






Also, note that with the triangle lengths available, regardless of it being any specific type of triangle, you didn't need to determine the height. Instead, you could have directly solved the problem using these values in Heron's formula. I just saw you added the question itself. In your case, you could have also used the Pythagorean Theorem to determine the other side lengths, then getting the area using those $2$ values, with it being simpler in this case then Heron's formula.
– John Omielan
19 mins ago














@Deepak you were right. It makes sense once you recognize that the triangle is a right angle and it's drawn out. I can see the height is one of the legs. Thanks
– Crt
15 mins ago




@Deepak you were right. It makes sense once you recognize that the triangle is a right angle and it's drawn out. I can see the height is one of the legs. Thanks
– Crt
15 mins ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















3














Pythagoras' theorem ($a^2 + b^2 = c^2$) is generally used to compute one "missing" side when two others are known in a triangle known to be a right triangle.



However, there is a converse of Pythagoras' theorem, whereby you can show a given triangle is right if the side lengths satisfy the relation.



In this case, $8^2 + 8^2 = (8sqrt 2)^2$, so the triangle is right-angled, and you can immediately find the area as $frac 12 (8)(8) = 32$.



(In this case, you don't need the converse. It's already given to be a right triangle. But in the case you're given the side lengths of $(8,8,8sqrt 2)$, you can apply the converse to simplify your work a bit).






share|cite|improve this answer































    1














    If you know the lengths $L_1$, $L_2$ of two legs of a triangle and the angle between them $theta$, then you can calculate the area as
    $$A = frac12L_1L_2sintheta$$
    In your case $theta$ was 90 degrees, making the formula $A = frac12L_1L_2$.






    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Erik Parkinson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.


























      0














      After the edit to the OP, yeah, as pointed out by Deepak in the comments: it is because the triangle is not just any isosceles triangle, but an isosceles right triangle. That the question specifies this also may be indicative that your "shortcut" was the intended method (though kudos to you for finding an additional method either way!).



      As is probably obvious whenever you draw right triangles, its area can be given by



      $$A = frac12 ab$$



      where $a,b$ are the legs of the triangle. In right triangles, the legs can be used as the height and the base. To actually further this discussion and extend to isosceles right triangles, suppose you have only the hypotenuse $h$. Since the triangle is isosceles and right, the legs are equal ($a=b$) and are given by $h/sqrt 2$. In that light we could make this even shorter by noting:



      $$A = frac12 ab = frac12 frac{h}{sqrt 2} frac{h}{sqrt 2} = frac{h^2}{4}$$



      so in a sense you don't even need to find the legs: in an isosceles right triangle, the hypotenuse uniquely determines the legs, and vice versa.






      share|cite|improve this answer





















        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });






        Crt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3059090%2fisosceles-triangle-height%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        3














        Pythagoras' theorem ($a^2 + b^2 = c^2$) is generally used to compute one "missing" side when two others are known in a triangle known to be a right triangle.



        However, there is a converse of Pythagoras' theorem, whereby you can show a given triangle is right if the side lengths satisfy the relation.



        In this case, $8^2 + 8^2 = (8sqrt 2)^2$, so the triangle is right-angled, and you can immediately find the area as $frac 12 (8)(8) = 32$.



        (In this case, you don't need the converse. It's already given to be a right triangle. But in the case you're given the side lengths of $(8,8,8sqrt 2)$, you can apply the converse to simplify your work a bit).






        share|cite|improve this answer




























          3














          Pythagoras' theorem ($a^2 + b^2 = c^2$) is generally used to compute one "missing" side when two others are known in a triangle known to be a right triangle.



          However, there is a converse of Pythagoras' theorem, whereby you can show a given triangle is right if the side lengths satisfy the relation.



          In this case, $8^2 + 8^2 = (8sqrt 2)^2$, so the triangle is right-angled, and you can immediately find the area as $frac 12 (8)(8) = 32$.



          (In this case, you don't need the converse. It's already given to be a right triangle. But in the case you're given the side lengths of $(8,8,8sqrt 2)$, you can apply the converse to simplify your work a bit).






          share|cite|improve this answer


























            3












            3








            3






            Pythagoras' theorem ($a^2 + b^2 = c^2$) is generally used to compute one "missing" side when two others are known in a triangle known to be a right triangle.



            However, there is a converse of Pythagoras' theorem, whereby you can show a given triangle is right if the side lengths satisfy the relation.



            In this case, $8^2 + 8^2 = (8sqrt 2)^2$, so the triangle is right-angled, and you can immediately find the area as $frac 12 (8)(8) = 32$.



            (In this case, you don't need the converse. It's already given to be a right triangle. But in the case you're given the side lengths of $(8,8,8sqrt 2)$, you can apply the converse to simplify your work a bit).






            share|cite|improve this answer














            Pythagoras' theorem ($a^2 + b^2 = c^2$) is generally used to compute one "missing" side when two others are known in a triangle known to be a right triangle.



            However, there is a converse of Pythagoras' theorem, whereby you can show a given triangle is right if the side lengths satisfy the relation.



            In this case, $8^2 + 8^2 = (8sqrt 2)^2$, so the triangle is right-angled, and you can immediately find the area as $frac 12 (8)(8) = 32$.



            (In this case, you don't need the converse. It's already given to be a right triangle. But in the case you're given the side lengths of $(8,8,8sqrt 2)$, you can apply the converse to simplify your work a bit).







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 9 mins ago

























            answered 15 mins ago









            Deepak

            16.8k11436




            16.8k11436























                1














                If you know the lengths $L_1$, $L_2$ of two legs of a triangle and the angle between them $theta$, then you can calculate the area as
                $$A = frac12L_1L_2sintheta$$
                In your case $theta$ was 90 degrees, making the formula $A = frac12L_1L_2$.






                share|cite|improve this answer








                New contributor




                Erik Parkinson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.























                  1














                  If you know the lengths $L_1$, $L_2$ of two legs of a triangle and the angle between them $theta$, then you can calculate the area as
                  $$A = frac12L_1L_2sintheta$$
                  In your case $theta$ was 90 degrees, making the formula $A = frac12L_1L_2$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  Erik Parkinson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                    1












                    1








                    1






                    If you know the lengths $L_1$, $L_2$ of two legs of a triangle and the angle between them $theta$, then you can calculate the area as
                    $$A = frac12L_1L_2sintheta$$
                    In your case $theta$ was 90 degrees, making the formula $A = frac12L_1L_2$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    New contributor




                    Erik Parkinson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                    If you know the lengths $L_1$, $L_2$ of two legs of a triangle and the angle between them $theta$, then you can calculate the area as
                    $$A = frac12L_1L_2sintheta$$
                    In your case $theta$ was 90 degrees, making the formula $A = frac12L_1L_2$.







                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    New contributor




                    Erik Parkinson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer






                    New contributor




                    Erik Parkinson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                    answered 16 mins ago









                    Erik Parkinson

                    1164




                    1164




                    New contributor




                    Erik Parkinson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.





                    New contributor





                    Erik Parkinson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.






                    Erik Parkinson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.























                        0














                        After the edit to the OP, yeah, as pointed out by Deepak in the comments: it is because the triangle is not just any isosceles triangle, but an isosceles right triangle. That the question specifies this also may be indicative that your "shortcut" was the intended method (though kudos to you for finding an additional method either way!).



                        As is probably obvious whenever you draw right triangles, its area can be given by



                        $$A = frac12 ab$$



                        where $a,b$ are the legs of the triangle. In right triangles, the legs can be used as the height and the base. To actually further this discussion and extend to isosceles right triangles, suppose you have only the hypotenuse $h$. Since the triangle is isosceles and right, the legs are equal ($a=b$) and are given by $h/sqrt 2$. In that light we could make this even shorter by noting:



                        $$A = frac12 ab = frac12 frac{h}{sqrt 2} frac{h}{sqrt 2} = frac{h^2}{4}$$



                        so in a sense you don't even need to find the legs: in an isosceles right triangle, the hypotenuse uniquely determines the legs, and vice versa.






                        share|cite|improve this answer


























                          0














                          After the edit to the OP, yeah, as pointed out by Deepak in the comments: it is because the triangle is not just any isosceles triangle, but an isosceles right triangle. That the question specifies this also may be indicative that your "shortcut" was the intended method (though kudos to you for finding an additional method either way!).



                          As is probably obvious whenever you draw right triangles, its area can be given by



                          $$A = frac12 ab$$



                          where $a,b$ are the legs of the triangle. In right triangles, the legs can be used as the height and the base. To actually further this discussion and extend to isosceles right triangles, suppose you have only the hypotenuse $h$. Since the triangle is isosceles and right, the legs are equal ($a=b$) and are given by $h/sqrt 2$. In that light we could make this even shorter by noting:



                          $$A = frac12 ab = frac12 frac{h}{sqrt 2} frac{h}{sqrt 2} = frac{h^2}{4}$$



                          so in a sense you don't even need to find the legs: in an isosceles right triangle, the hypotenuse uniquely determines the legs, and vice versa.






                          share|cite|improve this answer
























                            0












                            0








                            0






                            After the edit to the OP, yeah, as pointed out by Deepak in the comments: it is because the triangle is not just any isosceles triangle, but an isosceles right triangle. That the question specifies this also may be indicative that your "shortcut" was the intended method (though kudos to you for finding an additional method either way!).



                            As is probably obvious whenever you draw right triangles, its area can be given by



                            $$A = frac12 ab$$



                            where $a,b$ are the legs of the triangle. In right triangles, the legs can be used as the height and the base. To actually further this discussion and extend to isosceles right triangles, suppose you have only the hypotenuse $h$. Since the triangle is isosceles and right, the legs are equal ($a=b$) and are given by $h/sqrt 2$. In that light we could make this even shorter by noting:



                            $$A = frac12 ab = frac12 frac{h}{sqrt 2} frac{h}{sqrt 2} = frac{h^2}{4}$$



                            so in a sense you don't even need to find the legs: in an isosceles right triangle, the hypotenuse uniquely determines the legs, and vice versa.






                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            After the edit to the OP, yeah, as pointed out by Deepak in the comments: it is because the triangle is not just any isosceles triangle, but an isosceles right triangle. That the question specifies this also may be indicative that your "shortcut" was the intended method (though kudos to you for finding an additional method either way!).



                            As is probably obvious whenever you draw right triangles, its area can be given by



                            $$A = frac12 ab$$



                            where $a,b$ are the legs of the triangle. In right triangles, the legs can be used as the height and the base. To actually further this discussion and extend to isosceles right triangles, suppose you have only the hypotenuse $h$. Since the triangle is isosceles and right, the legs are equal ($a=b$) and are given by $h/sqrt 2$. In that light we could make this even shorter by noting:



                            $$A = frac12 ab = frac12 frac{h}{sqrt 2} frac{h}{sqrt 2} = frac{h^2}{4}$$



                            so in a sense you don't even need to find the legs: in an isosceles right triangle, the hypotenuse uniquely determines the legs, and vice versa.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered 12 mins ago









                            Eevee Trainer

                            4,6221634




                            4,6221634






















                                Crt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                                draft saved

                                draft discarded


















                                Crt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                                Crt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                Crt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3059090%2fisosceles-triangle-height%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Costa Masnaga

                                Fotorealismo

                                Sidney Franklin