JavaScript function to be create to calculate Price based on some info (example - store offers)
I have an array [2,5,1]
$ which is prices, Customer pays 2
$ for the first item because no discount for first item,
5-2 = 3
for the second item,
min(1st item, 2nd item) min(2,5) = 2
for 3rd Item; but if next item is lesser in cost compared to second item e.g. 1 is less 2 the cost will be zero;
so 2+3+0 is output of calculate price.
If i have one more input
[2,5,1,6]
2 + (5-2) + 0 + (6 - min(2,5,1))
How I can achieve this -
I was trying to write something like this -
function calculateAmount(prices) {
// Write your code here
var totalCostPurchase;
var cost = ;
var zero = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < prices.length; i++) {
if (i === 0) {
cost.push(prices[i]);
} else if (i === 1) {
cost.push(prices[i] - cost[i - 1]);
} else {
var minCost = Math.min(...prices.slice(0,i));
console.log(minCost);
if (minCost > prices[i]) {
cost.push(zero);
} else {
cost.push(prices[i] - minCost);
}
}
}
totalCostPurchase = cost.reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0);
console.log(totalCostPurchase);
return totalCostPurchase;
}
Please guide.
javascript arrays
add a comment |
I have an array [2,5,1]
$ which is prices, Customer pays 2
$ for the first item because no discount for first item,
5-2 = 3
for the second item,
min(1st item, 2nd item) min(2,5) = 2
for 3rd Item; but if next item is lesser in cost compared to second item e.g. 1 is less 2 the cost will be zero;
so 2+3+0 is output of calculate price.
If i have one more input
[2,5,1,6]
2 + (5-2) + 0 + (6 - min(2,5,1))
How I can achieve this -
I was trying to write something like this -
function calculateAmount(prices) {
// Write your code here
var totalCostPurchase;
var cost = ;
var zero = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < prices.length; i++) {
if (i === 0) {
cost.push(prices[i]);
} else if (i === 1) {
cost.push(prices[i] - cost[i - 1]);
} else {
var minCost = Math.min(...prices.slice(0,i));
console.log(minCost);
if (minCost > prices[i]) {
cost.push(zero);
} else {
cost.push(prices[i] - minCost);
}
}
}
totalCostPurchase = cost.reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0);
console.log(totalCostPurchase);
return totalCostPurchase;
}
Please guide.
javascript arrays
1
Please write the formula. Why the 3th item is0
, it should be1
(2 - 1
), no?
– Chayim Friedman
Nov 25 '18 at 6:47
Agreed-- a clearer understanding of what the input data represents and your requirements would probably help you get a meaningful answer more quickly.
– Alexander Nied
Nov 25 '18 at 6:49
Will the array size increase? If you've some pattern over calculation of every item, you can write recursive function and will be easier to understand.
– Abhishek
Nov 25 '18 at 6:52
yes, array size will increae, my function works for upto 4 but not working for 10 items
– Javascript Coder
Nov 25 '18 at 6:54
add a comment |
I have an array [2,5,1]
$ which is prices, Customer pays 2
$ for the first item because no discount for first item,
5-2 = 3
for the second item,
min(1st item, 2nd item) min(2,5) = 2
for 3rd Item; but if next item is lesser in cost compared to second item e.g. 1 is less 2 the cost will be zero;
so 2+3+0 is output of calculate price.
If i have one more input
[2,5,1,6]
2 + (5-2) + 0 + (6 - min(2,5,1))
How I can achieve this -
I was trying to write something like this -
function calculateAmount(prices) {
// Write your code here
var totalCostPurchase;
var cost = ;
var zero = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < prices.length; i++) {
if (i === 0) {
cost.push(prices[i]);
} else if (i === 1) {
cost.push(prices[i] - cost[i - 1]);
} else {
var minCost = Math.min(...prices.slice(0,i));
console.log(minCost);
if (minCost > prices[i]) {
cost.push(zero);
} else {
cost.push(prices[i] - minCost);
}
}
}
totalCostPurchase = cost.reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0);
console.log(totalCostPurchase);
return totalCostPurchase;
}
Please guide.
javascript arrays
I have an array [2,5,1]
$ which is prices, Customer pays 2
$ for the first item because no discount for first item,
5-2 = 3
for the second item,
min(1st item, 2nd item) min(2,5) = 2
for 3rd Item; but if next item is lesser in cost compared to second item e.g. 1 is less 2 the cost will be zero;
so 2+3+0 is output of calculate price.
If i have one more input
[2,5,1,6]
2 + (5-2) + 0 + (6 - min(2,5,1))
How I can achieve this -
I was trying to write something like this -
function calculateAmount(prices) {
// Write your code here
var totalCostPurchase;
var cost = ;
var zero = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < prices.length; i++) {
if (i === 0) {
cost.push(prices[i]);
} else if (i === 1) {
cost.push(prices[i] - cost[i - 1]);
} else {
var minCost = Math.min(...prices.slice(0,i));
console.log(minCost);
if (minCost > prices[i]) {
cost.push(zero);
} else {
cost.push(prices[i] - minCost);
}
}
}
totalCostPurchase = cost.reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0);
console.log(totalCostPurchase);
return totalCostPurchase;
}
Please guide.
javascript arrays
javascript arrays
edited Nov 25 '18 at 7:31
Javascript Coder
asked Nov 25 '18 at 6:36
Javascript CoderJavascript Coder
3,41053059
3,41053059
1
Please write the formula. Why the 3th item is0
, it should be1
(2 - 1
), no?
– Chayim Friedman
Nov 25 '18 at 6:47
Agreed-- a clearer understanding of what the input data represents and your requirements would probably help you get a meaningful answer more quickly.
– Alexander Nied
Nov 25 '18 at 6:49
Will the array size increase? If you've some pattern over calculation of every item, you can write recursive function and will be easier to understand.
– Abhishek
Nov 25 '18 at 6:52
yes, array size will increae, my function works for upto 4 but not working for 10 items
– Javascript Coder
Nov 25 '18 at 6:54
add a comment |
1
Please write the formula. Why the 3th item is0
, it should be1
(2 - 1
), no?
– Chayim Friedman
Nov 25 '18 at 6:47
Agreed-- a clearer understanding of what the input data represents and your requirements would probably help you get a meaningful answer more quickly.
– Alexander Nied
Nov 25 '18 at 6:49
Will the array size increase? If you've some pattern over calculation of every item, you can write recursive function and will be easier to understand.
– Abhishek
Nov 25 '18 at 6:52
yes, array size will increae, my function works for upto 4 but not working for 10 items
– Javascript Coder
Nov 25 '18 at 6:54
1
1
Please write the formula. Why the 3th item is
0
, it should be 1
(2 - 1
), no?– Chayim Friedman
Nov 25 '18 at 6:47
Please write the formula. Why the 3th item is
0
, it should be 1
(2 - 1
), no?– Chayim Friedman
Nov 25 '18 at 6:47
Agreed-- a clearer understanding of what the input data represents and your requirements would probably help you get a meaningful answer more quickly.
– Alexander Nied
Nov 25 '18 at 6:49
Agreed-- a clearer understanding of what the input data represents and your requirements would probably help you get a meaningful answer more quickly.
– Alexander Nied
Nov 25 '18 at 6:49
Will the array size increase? If you've some pattern over calculation of every item, you can write recursive function and will be easier to understand.
– Abhishek
Nov 25 '18 at 6:52
Will the array size increase? If you've some pattern over calculation of every item, you can write recursive function and will be easier to understand.
– Abhishek
Nov 25 '18 at 6:52
yes, array size will increae, my function works for upto 4 but not working for 10 items
– Javascript Coder
Nov 25 '18 at 6:54
yes, array size will increae, my function works for upto 4 but not working for 10 items
– Javascript Coder
Nov 25 '18 at 6:54
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
You can use Array.map
and Array.reduce
for this
var a = [2,5,1,6]
let res = a.map((d,i) => i != 0
? d - Math.min(...a.slice(0, i+1))
: d)
.reduce((x, y) => x + y)
console.log(res)
Nice. However, this has O(n^2) time complexity.
– slider
Nov 25 '18 at 7:13
Hi @slider. Nice to e meet you again.. No it does not have O(n^2).. Its rather O(2n) .... no ?
– Nitish Narang
Nov 25 '18 at 7:14
It's clearly O(n^2) because you compute the minimum usingMath.min(...a.slice(0, i+1))
for each element.
– slider
Nov 25 '18 at 7:16
1
hmmm.. i see but i think it's less than n^2, i am not sure how to calculate it exactly.. neverthless if array length is not in hundreds/thousands then difference is hardly noticeble :) Btw good point @slider It's a good learning experience answering with you...
– Nitish Narang
Nov 25 '18 at 7:20
add a comment |
You can use reduce
where the accumulator keeps track of the sum and min and updates based on your rules:
function total(prices) {
return prices.reduce(([sum, min], p, i) => {
if (i === 0) return [p, p];
let newSum = sum;
if (p >= min) newSum += p - min;
return [newSum, Math.min(p, min)];
}, )[0];
}
console.log(total([2, 5, 1]));
console.log(total([2, 5, 1, 6]));
add a comment |
I tried the answer, And this seems to work for all the cases, this may not be best solution but this is what i think through.
function calculateAmount(prices) {
// Write your code here
var totalCostPurchase;
var cost = ;
var zero = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < prices.length; i++) {
if (i === 0) {
cost.push(prices[i]);
} else if (i === 1) {
if ((prices[i] - cost[i - 1]) < 0) {
cost.push(zero);
} else {
cost.push(prices[i] - cost[i - 1]);
}
} else {
var minCost = Math.min(...prices.slice(0,i));
if (minCost > prices[i]) {
cost.push(zero);
} else {
if ((prices[i] - minCost) < 0) {
cost.push(zero);
} else {
cost.push(prices[i] - minCost);
}
}
}
}
totalCostPurchase = cost.reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0);
return totalCostPurchase;
}
I will try to reduce the code and will try to clean up.
– Javascript Coder
Nov 25 '18 at 7:11
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53465237%2fjavascript-function-to-be-create-to-calculate-price-based-on-some-info-example%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You can use Array.map
and Array.reduce
for this
var a = [2,5,1,6]
let res = a.map((d,i) => i != 0
? d - Math.min(...a.slice(0, i+1))
: d)
.reduce((x, y) => x + y)
console.log(res)
Nice. However, this has O(n^2) time complexity.
– slider
Nov 25 '18 at 7:13
Hi @slider. Nice to e meet you again.. No it does not have O(n^2).. Its rather O(2n) .... no ?
– Nitish Narang
Nov 25 '18 at 7:14
It's clearly O(n^2) because you compute the minimum usingMath.min(...a.slice(0, i+1))
for each element.
– slider
Nov 25 '18 at 7:16
1
hmmm.. i see but i think it's less than n^2, i am not sure how to calculate it exactly.. neverthless if array length is not in hundreds/thousands then difference is hardly noticeble :) Btw good point @slider It's a good learning experience answering with you...
– Nitish Narang
Nov 25 '18 at 7:20
add a comment |
You can use Array.map
and Array.reduce
for this
var a = [2,5,1,6]
let res = a.map((d,i) => i != 0
? d - Math.min(...a.slice(0, i+1))
: d)
.reduce((x, y) => x + y)
console.log(res)
Nice. However, this has O(n^2) time complexity.
– slider
Nov 25 '18 at 7:13
Hi @slider. Nice to e meet you again.. No it does not have O(n^2).. Its rather O(2n) .... no ?
– Nitish Narang
Nov 25 '18 at 7:14
It's clearly O(n^2) because you compute the minimum usingMath.min(...a.slice(0, i+1))
for each element.
– slider
Nov 25 '18 at 7:16
1
hmmm.. i see but i think it's less than n^2, i am not sure how to calculate it exactly.. neverthless if array length is not in hundreds/thousands then difference is hardly noticeble :) Btw good point @slider It's a good learning experience answering with you...
– Nitish Narang
Nov 25 '18 at 7:20
add a comment |
You can use Array.map
and Array.reduce
for this
var a = [2,5,1,6]
let res = a.map((d,i) => i != 0
? d - Math.min(...a.slice(0, i+1))
: d)
.reduce((x, y) => x + y)
console.log(res)
You can use Array.map
and Array.reduce
for this
var a = [2,5,1,6]
let res = a.map((d,i) => i != 0
? d - Math.min(...a.slice(0, i+1))
: d)
.reduce((x, y) => x + y)
console.log(res)
var a = [2,5,1,6]
let res = a.map((d,i) => i != 0
? d - Math.min(...a.slice(0, i+1))
: d)
.reduce((x, y) => x + y)
console.log(res)
var a = [2,5,1,6]
let res = a.map((d,i) => i != 0
? d - Math.min(...a.slice(0, i+1))
: d)
.reduce((x, y) => x + y)
console.log(res)
answered Nov 25 '18 at 7:11
Nitish NarangNitish Narang
2,9601815
2,9601815
Nice. However, this has O(n^2) time complexity.
– slider
Nov 25 '18 at 7:13
Hi @slider. Nice to e meet you again.. No it does not have O(n^2).. Its rather O(2n) .... no ?
– Nitish Narang
Nov 25 '18 at 7:14
It's clearly O(n^2) because you compute the minimum usingMath.min(...a.slice(0, i+1))
for each element.
– slider
Nov 25 '18 at 7:16
1
hmmm.. i see but i think it's less than n^2, i am not sure how to calculate it exactly.. neverthless if array length is not in hundreds/thousands then difference is hardly noticeble :) Btw good point @slider It's a good learning experience answering with you...
– Nitish Narang
Nov 25 '18 at 7:20
add a comment |
Nice. However, this has O(n^2) time complexity.
– slider
Nov 25 '18 at 7:13
Hi @slider. Nice to e meet you again.. No it does not have O(n^2).. Its rather O(2n) .... no ?
– Nitish Narang
Nov 25 '18 at 7:14
It's clearly O(n^2) because you compute the minimum usingMath.min(...a.slice(0, i+1))
for each element.
– slider
Nov 25 '18 at 7:16
1
hmmm.. i see but i think it's less than n^2, i am not sure how to calculate it exactly.. neverthless if array length is not in hundreds/thousands then difference is hardly noticeble :) Btw good point @slider It's a good learning experience answering with you...
– Nitish Narang
Nov 25 '18 at 7:20
Nice. However, this has O(n^2) time complexity.
– slider
Nov 25 '18 at 7:13
Nice. However, this has O(n^2) time complexity.
– slider
Nov 25 '18 at 7:13
Hi @slider. Nice to e meet you again.. No it does not have O(n^2).. Its rather O(2n) .... no ?
– Nitish Narang
Nov 25 '18 at 7:14
Hi @slider. Nice to e meet you again.. No it does not have O(n^2).. Its rather O(2n) .... no ?
– Nitish Narang
Nov 25 '18 at 7:14
It's clearly O(n^2) because you compute the minimum using
Math.min(...a.slice(0, i+1))
for each element.– slider
Nov 25 '18 at 7:16
It's clearly O(n^2) because you compute the minimum using
Math.min(...a.slice(0, i+1))
for each element.– slider
Nov 25 '18 at 7:16
1
1
hmmm.. i see but i think it's less than n^2, i am not sure how to calculate it exactly.. neverthless if array length is not in hundreds/thousands then difference is hardly noticeble :) Btw good point @slider It's a good learning experience answering with you...
– Nitish Narang
Nov 25 '18 at 7:20
hmmm.. i see but i think it's less than n^2, i am not sure how to calculate it exactly.. neverthless if array length is not in hundreds/thousands then difference is hardly noticeble :) Btw good point @slider It's a good learning experience answering with you...
– Nitish Narang
Nov 25 '18 at 7:20
add a comment |
You can use reduce
where the accumulator keeps track of the sum and min and updates based on your rules:
function total(prices) {
return prices.reduce(([sum, min], p, i) => {
if (i === 0) return [p, p];
let newSum = sum;
if (p >= min) newSum += p - min;
return [newSum, Math.min(p, min)];
}, )[0];
}
console.log(total([2, 5, 1]));
console.log(total([2, 5, 1, 6]));
add a comment |
You can use reduce
where the accumulator keeps track of the sum and min and updates based on your rules:
function total(prices) {
return prices.reduce(([sum, min], p, i) => {
if (i === 0) return [p, p];
let newSum = sum;
if (p >= min) newSum += p - min;
return [newSum, Math.min(p, min)];
}, )[0];
}
console.log(total([2, 5, 1]));
console.log(total([2, 5, 1, 6]));
add a comment |
You can use reduce
where the accumulator keeps track of the sum and min and updates based on your rules:
function total(prices) {
return prices.reduce(([sum, min], p, i) => {
if (i === 0) return [p, p];
let newSum = sum;
if (p >= min) newSum += p - min;
return [newSum, Math.min(p, min)];
}, )[0];
}
console.log(total([2, 5, 1]));
console.log(total([2, 5, 1, 6]));
You can use reduce
where the accumulator keeps track of the sum and min and updates based on your rules:
function total(prices) {
return prices.reduce(([sum, min], p, i) => {
if (i === 0) return [p, p];
let newSum = sum;
if (p >= min) newSum += p - min;
return [newSum, Math.min(p, min)];
}, )[0];
}
console.log(total([2, 5, 1]));
console.log(total([2, 5, 1, 6]));
function total(prices) {
return prices.reduce(([sum, min], p, i) => {
if (i === 0) return [p, p];
let newSum = sum;
if (p >= min) newSum += p - min;
return [newSum, Math.min(p, min)];
}, )[0];
}
console.log(total([2, 5, 1]));
console.log(total([2, 5, 1, 6]));
function total(prices) {
return prices.reduce(([sum, min], p, i) => {
if (i === 0) return [p, p];
let newSum = sum;
if (p >= min) newSum += p - min;
return [newSum, Math.min(p, min)];
}, )[0];
}
console.log(total([2, 5, 1]));
console.log(total([2, 5, 1, 6]));
answered Nov 25 '18 at 6:59
sliderslider
8,47311231
8,47311231
add a comment |
add a comment |
I tried the answer, And this seems to work for all the cases, this may not be best solution but this is what i think through.
function calculateAmount(prices) {
// Write your code here
var totalCostPurchase;
var cost = ;
var zero = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < prices.length; i++) {
if (i === 0) {
cost.push(prices[i]);
} else if (i === 1) {
if ((prices[i] - cost[i - 1]) < 0) {
cost.push(zero);
} else {
cost.push(prices[i] - cost[i - 1]);
}
} else {
var minCost = Math.min(...prices.slice(0,i));
if (minCost > prices[i]) {
cost.push(zero);
} else {
if ((prices[i] - minCost) < 0) {
cost.push(zero);
} else {
cost.push(prices[i] - minCost);
}
}
}
}
totalCostPurchase = cost.reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0);
return totalCostPurchase;
}
I will try to reduce the code and will try to clean up.
– Javascript Coder
Nov 25 '18 at 7:11
add a comment |
I tried the answer, And this seems to work for all the cases, this may not be best solution but this is what i think through.
function calculateAmount(prices) {
// Write your code here
var totalCostPurchase;
var cost = ;
var zero = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < prices.length; i++) {
if (i === 0) {
cost.push(prices[i]);
} else if (i === 1) {
if ((prices[i] - cost[i - 1]) < 0) {
cost.push(zero);
} else {
cost.push(prices[i] - cost[i - 1]);
}
} else {
var minCost = Math.min(...prices.slice(0,i));
if (minCost > prices[i]) {
cost.push(zero);
} else {
if ((prices[i] - minCost) < 0) {
cost.push(zero);
} else {
cost.push(prices[i] - minCost);
}
}
}
}
totalCostPurchase = cost.reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0);
return totalCostPurchase;
}
I will try to reduce the code and will try to clean up.
– Javascript Coder
Nov 25 '18 at 7:11
add a comment |
I tried the answer, And this seems to work for all the cases, this may not be best solution but this is what i think through.
function calculateAmount(prices) {
// Write your code here
var totalCostPurchase;
var cost = ;
var zero = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < prices.length; i++) {
if (i === 0) {
cost.push(prices[i]);
} else if (i === 1) {
if ((prices[i] - cost[i - 1]) < 0) {
cost.push(zero);
} else {
cost.push(prices[i] - cost[i - 1]);
}
} else {
var minCost = Math.min(...prices.slice(0,i));
if (minCost > prices[i]) {
cost.push(zero);
} else {
if ((prices[i] - minCost) < 0) {
cost.push(zero);
} else {
cost.push(prices[i] - minCost);
}
}
}
}
totalCostPurchase = cost.reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0);
return totalCostPurchase;
}
I tried the answer, And this seems to work for all the cases, this may not be best solution but this is what i think through.
function calculateAmount(prices) {
// Write your code here
var totalCostPurchase;
var cost = ;
var zero = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < prices.length; i++) {
if (i === 0) {
cost.push(prices[i]);
} else if (i === 1) {
if ((prices[i] - cost[i - 1]) < 0) {
cost.push(zero);
} else {
cost.push(prices[i] - cost[i - 1]);
}
} else {
var minCost = Math.min(...prices.slice(0,i));
if (minCost > prices[i]) {
cost.push(zero);
} else {
if ((prices[i] - minCost) < 0) {
cost.push(zero);
} else {
cost.push(prices[i] - minCost);
}
}
}
}
totalCostPurchase = cost.reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0);
return totalCostPurchase;
}
answered Nov 25 '18 at 7:10
Javascript CoderJavascript Coder
3,41053059
3,41053059
I will try to reduce the code and will try to clean up.
– Javascript Coder
Nov 25 '18 at 7:11
add a comment |
I will try to reduce the code and will try to clean up.
– Javascript Coder
Nov 25 '18 at 7:11
I will try to reduce the code and will try to clean up.
– Javascript Coder
Nov 25 '18 at 7:11
I will try to reduce the code and will try to clean up.
– Javascript Coder
Nov 25 '18 at 7:11
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53465237%2fjavascript-function-to-be-create-to-calculate-price-based-on-some-info-example%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Please write the formula. Why the 3th item is
0
, it should be1
(2 - 1
), no?– Chayim Friedman
Nov 25 '18 at 6:47
Agreed-- a clearer understanding of what the input data represents and your requirements would probably help you get a meaningful answer more quickly.
– Alexander Nied
Nov 25 '18 at 6:49
Will the array size increase? If you've some pattern over calculation of every item, you can write recursive function and will be easier to understand.
– Abhishek
Nov 25 '18 at 6:52
yes, array size will increae, my function works for upto 4 but not working for 10 items
– Javascript Coder
Nov 25 '18 at 6:54