What does “Renewable once, consecutively” presidential term limit mean?
The German president limit limit is "Renewable once, consecutively".
Does this mean the he can only be re-elected once and only if immediately after his first term.
OR
Does it mean that he can be re-elected as many times as he can just as long as no more than two consecutive terms.
president presidential-term
asked Nov 26 '18 at 2:29
gbdgbd
26716
add a comment |
The German president limit limit is "Renewable once, consecutively".
Does this mean the he can only be re-elected once and only if immediately after his first term.
OR
Does it mean that he can be re-elected as many times as he can just as long as no more than two consecutive terms.
president presidential-term
asked Nov 26 '18 at 2:29
gbdgbd
26716
add a comment |
The German president limit limit is "Renewable once, consecutively".
Does this mean the he can only be re-elected once and only if immediately after his first term.
OR
Does it mean that he can be re-elected as many times as he can just as long as no more than two consecutive terms.
president presidential-term
asked Nov 26 '18 at 2:29
gbdgbd
26716
The German president limit limit is "Renewable once, consecutively".
Does this mean the he can only be re-elected once and only if immediately after his first term.
OR
Does it mean that he can be re-elected as many times as he can just as long as no more than two consecutive terms.
president presidential-term
president presidential-term
asked Nov 26 '18 at 2:29
gbdgbd
26716
asked Nov 26 '18 at 2:29
gbdgbd
26716
asked Nov 26 '18 at 2:29
gbdgbd
26716
asked Nov 26 '18 at 2:29
gbdgbd
26716
asked Nov 26 '18 at 2:29
gbdgbd
26716
26716
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
There is no precedent for either scenario. It seems that legal commentary reads this as "no more than two consecutive terms, unlimited total terms."
answered Nov 26 '18 at 7:07
o.m.o.m.
10.4k11943
add a comment |
The English translation of the Basic Law (a document that is for all intents and purposes an long term interim constitution) states in Section 5, Article 54, Clause 2 (emphasis mine):
The term of office of the Federal President shall be five
years. Re-election for a consecutive term shall be permitted
only once.
This wording appears to state that the President of Germany can be elected to an unlimited number of terms but can not run for a third consecutive term (i.e. they must sit out for a term before being able to be elected again).
Link to the English translation in PDF form
English translation from the German Cabinet's website
answered Nov 26 '18 at 9:45
sau226sau226
59519
I agree with this interpretation. If no article states otherwise than it should be possible for the same person to do a third term after an election gap. Incidentally this has happened in another country, US, where Gover Cleveland has won non-consecutive terms. I don't think this is possible nowadays (22nd amend.) but the powers of this position in a Presidential system (i.e. US) is very different from the same position on Parliamentary republics (or semi-presidential, i.e. EU).
– armatita
Nov 26 '18 at 13:01
@armatita The US has had few who tried to beat the accepted convention of two terms. but the 22nd amendment was brought in because FD Roosevelt managed 4 consecutive elections and Congress wanted to clamp down on that as hard as possible so limited all the ways a president could last >8 years.
– matt_black
Nov 26 '18 at 13:56
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "475"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f35612%2fwhat-does-renewable-once-consecutively-presidential-term-limit-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There is no precedent for either scenario. It seems that legal commentary reads this as "no more than two consecutive terms, unlimited total terms."
answered Nov 26 '18 at 7:07
o.m.o.m.
10.4k11943
add a comment |
There is no precedent for either scenario. It seems that legal commentary reads this as "no more than two consecutive terms, unlimited total terms."
answered Nov 26 '18 at 7:07
o.m.o.m.
10.4k11943
add a comment |
There is no precedent for either scenario. It seems that legal commentary reads this as "no more than two consecutive terms, unlimited total terms."
answered Nov 26 '18 at 7:07
o.m.o.m.
10.4k11943
There is no precedent for either scenario. It seems that legal commentary reads this as "no more than two consecutive terms, unlimited total terms."
answered Nov 26 '18 at 7:07
o.m.o.m.
10.4k11943
answered Nov 26 '18 at 7:07
o.m.o.m.
10.4k11943
answered Nov 26 '18 at 7:07
o.m.o.m.
10.4k11943
answered Nov 26 '18 at 7:07
o.m.o.m.
10.4k11943
10.4k11943
add a comment |
add a comment |
The English translation of the Basic Law (a document that is for all intents and purposes an long term interim constitution) states in Section 5, Article 54, Clause 2 (emphasis mine):
The term of office of the Federal President shall be five
years. Re-election for a consecutive term shall be permitted
only once.
This wording appears to state that the President of Germany can be elected to an unlimited number of terms but can not run for a third consecutive term (i.e. they must sit out for a term before being able to be elected again).
Link to the English translation in PDF form
English translation from the German Cabinet's website
answered Nov 26 '18 at 9:45
sau226sau226
59519
I agree with this interpretation. If no article states otherwise than it should be possible for the same person to do a third term after an election gap. Incidentally this has happened in another country, US, where Gover Cleveland has won non-consecutive terms. I don't think this is possible nowadays (22nd amend.) but the powers of this position in a Presidential system (i.e. US) is very different from the same position on Parliamentary republics (or semi-presidential, i.e. EU).
– armatita
Nov 26 '18 at 13:01
@armatita The US has had few who tried to beat the accepted convention of two terms. but the 22nd amendment was brought in because FD Roosevelt managed 4 consecutive elections and Congress wanted to clamp down on that as hard as possible so limited all the ways a president could last >8 years.
– matt_black
Nov 26 '18 at 13:56
add a comment |
The English translation of the Basic Law (a document that is for all intents and purposes an long term interim constitution) states in Section 5, Article 54, Clause 2 (emphasis mine):
The term of office of the Federal President shall be five
years. Re-election for a consecutive term shall be permitted
only once.
This wording appears to state that the President of Germany can be elected to an unlimited number of terms but can not run for a third consecutive term (i.e. they must sit out for a term before being able to be elected again).
Link to the English translation in PDF form
English translation from the German Cabinet's website
answered Nov 26 '18 at 9:45
sau226sau226
59519
I agree with this interpretation. If no article states otherwise than it should be possible for the same person to do a third term after an election gap. Incidentally this has happened in another country, US, where Gover Cleveland has won non-consecutive terms. I don't think this is possible nowadays (22nd amend.) but the powers of this position in a Presidential system (i.e. US) is very different from the same position on Parliamentary republics (or semi-presidential, i.e. EU).
– armatita
Nov 26 '18 at 13:01
@armatita The US has had few who tried to beat the accepted convention of two terms. but the 22nd amendment was brought in because FD Roosevelt managed 4 consecutive elections and Congress wanted to clamp down on that as hard as possible so limited all the ways a president could last >8 years.
– matt_black
Nov 26 '18 at 13:56
add a comment |
The English translation of the Basic Law (a document that is for all intents and purposes an long term interim constitution) states in Section 5, Article 54, Clause 2 (emphasis mine):
The term of office of the Federal President shall be five
years. Re-election for a consecutive term shall be permitted
only once.
This wording appears to state that the President of Germany can be elected to an unlimited number of terms but can not run for a third consecutive term (i.e. they must sit out for a term before being able to be elected again).
Link to the English translation in PDF form
English translation from the German Cabinet's website
answered Nov 26 '18 at 9:45
sau226sau226
59519
The English translation of the Basic Law (a document that is for all intents and purposes an long term interim constitution) states in Section 5, Article 54, Clause 2 (emphasis mine):
The term of office of the Federal President shall be five
years. Re-election for a consecutive term shall be permitted
only once.
This wording appears to state that the President of Germany can be elected to an unlimited number of terms but can not run for a third consecutive term (i.e. they must sit out for a term before being able to be elected again).
Link to the English translation in PDF form
English translation from the German Cabinet's website
answered Nov 26 '18 at 9:45
sau226sau226
59519
answered Nov 26 '18 at 9:45
sau226sau226
59519
answered Nov 26 '18 at 9:45
sau226sau226
59519
answered Nov 26 '18 at 9:45
sau226sau226
59519
59519
I agree with this interpretation. If no article states otherwise than it should be possible for the same person to do a third term after an election gap. Incidentally this has happened in another country, US, where Gover Cleveland has won non-consecutive terms. I don't think this is possible nowadays (22nd amend.) but the powers of this position in a Presidential system (i.e. US) is very different from the same position on Parliamentary republics (or semi-presidential, i.e. EU).
– armatita
Nov 26 '18 at 13:01
@armatita The US has had few who tried to beat the accepted convention of two terms. but the 22nd amendment was brought in because FD Roosevelt managed 4 consecutive elections and Congress wanted to clamp down on that as hard as possible so limited all the ways a president could last >8 years.
– matt_black
Nov 26 '18 at 13:56
add a comment |
I agree with this interpretation. If no article states otherwise than it should be possible for the same person to do a third term after an election gap. Incidentally this has happened in another country, US, where Gover Cleveland has won non-consecutive terms. I don't think this is possible nowadays (22nd amend.) but the powers of this position in a Presidential system (i.e. US) is very different from the same position on Parliamentary republics (or semi-presidential, i.e. EU).
– armatita
Nov 26 '18 at 13:01
@armatita The US has had few who tried to beat the accepted convention of two terms. but the 22nd amendment was brought in because FD Roosevelt managed 4 consecutive elections and Congress wanted to clamp down on that as hard as possible so limited all the ways a president could last >8 years.
– matt_black
Nov 26 '18 at 13:56
I agree with this interpretation. If no article states otherwise than it should be possible for the same person to do a third term after an election gap. Incidentally this has happened in another country, US, where Gover Cleveland has won non-consecutive terms. I don't think this is possible nowadays (22nd amend.) but the powers of this position in a Presidential system (i.e. US) is very different from the same position on Parliamentary republics (or semi-presidential, i.e. EU).
– armatita
Nov 26 '18 at 13:01
I agree with this interpretation. If no article states otherwise than it should be possible for the same person to do a third term after an election gap. Incidentally this has happened in another country, US, where Gover Cleveland has won non-consecutive terms. I don't think this is possible nowadays (22nd amend.) but the powers of this position in a Presidential system (i.e. US) is very different from the same position on Parliamentary republics (or semi-presidential, i.e. EU).
– armatita
Nov 26 '18 at 13:01
@armatita The US has had few who tried to beat the accepted convention of two terms. but the 22nd amendment was brought in because FD Roosevelt managed 4 consecutive elections and Congress wanted to clamp down on that as hard as possible so limited all the ways a president could last >8 years.
– matt_black
Nov 26 '18 at 13:56
@armatita The US has had few who tried to beat the accepted convention of two terms. but the 22nd amendment was brought in because FD Roosevelt managed 4 consecutive elections and Congress wanted to clamp down on that as hard as possible so limited all the ways a president could last >8 years.
– matt_black
Nov 26 '18 at 13:56
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f35612%2fwhat-does-renewable-once-consecutively-presidential-term-limit-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
