Constant values as array element gives error
I am new to Typescript.
I have these enum and constant variables:
enum VALUE_MAP = { value1 = 'value1', value2 = 'value2', value3 = 'value3' }
const SOME_CONSTANT = [VALUE_MAP.value1, VALUE_MAP.value2];
And a method which uses SOME_CONSTANT to check if value exists.
export const hasValue = (value: string) => SOME_CONSTANT.includes(value);
This gives me error:
TS2345: Argument of type 'string' is not assignable to parameter of type 'VALUE_MAP'.
Using (value: VALUE_MAP) => will solve the issue, but I don't want to do that or may be I want to know why VALUE_MAP is getting used as type
Any help?
javascript reactjs typescript constants
add a comment |
I am new to Typescript.
I have these enum and constant variables:
enum VALUE_MAP = { value1 = 'value1', value2 = 'value2', value3 = 'value3' }
const SOME_CONSTANT = [VALUE_MAP.value1, VALUE_MAP.value2];
And a method which uses SOME_CONSTANT to check if value exists.
export const hasValue = (value: string) => SOME_CONSTANT.includes(value);
This gives me error:
TS2345: Argument of type 'string' is not assignable to parameter of type 'VALUE_MAP'.
Using (value: VALUE_MAP) => will solve the issue, but I don't want to do that or may be I want to know why VALUE_MAP is getting used as type
Any help?
javascript reactjs typescript constants
2
i'd use an enum for this case.
– Daniel A. White
Nov 20 at 14:17
to clarify if your object was like thisconst VALUE_MAP = { value1: 'valueA', value2: 'valueB', value3: 'valueC' }when calling hasValue you would passvalue1orvalueA?
– RezaRahmati
Nov 20 at 14:19
It's inferring the type from the way you've declaredVALUE_MAP. I'm guessing thatconst VALUE_MAP: any = {...}would solve this in this case, but is a workaround.... enum is def the way to go per @DanielA.White comment.
– cale_b
Nov 20 at 14:19
@DanielA.White Forgot to mention butVALUE_MAPis enum.
– Rahul Sagore
Nov 21 at 16:24
@DanielA.White Thanks for hint, ChangingVALUE_MAPto const fixed the errors.
– Rahul Sagore
Nov 21 at 16:48
add a comment |
I am new to Typescript.
I have these enum and constant variables:
enum VALUE_MAP = { value1 = 'value1', value2 = 'value2', value3 = 'value3' }
const SOME_CONSTANT = [VALUE_MAP.value1, VALUE_MAP.value2];
And a method which uses SOME_CONSTANT to check if value exists.
export const hasValue = (value: string) => SOME_CONSTANT.includes(value);
This gives me error:
TS2345: Argument of type 'string' is not assignable to parameter of type 'VALUE_MAP'.
Using (value: VALUE_MAP) => will solve the issue, but I don't want to do that or may be I want to know why VALUE_MAP is getting used as type
Any help?
javascript reactjs typescript constants
I am new to Typescript.
I have these enum and constant variables:
enum VALUE_MAP = { value1 = 'value1', value2 = 'value2', value3 = 'value3' }
const SOME_CONSTANT = [VALUE_MAP.value1, VALUE_MAP.value2];
And a method which uses SOME_CONSTANT to check if value exists.
export const hasValue = (value: string) => SOME_CONSTANT.includes(value);
This gives me error:
TS2345: Argument of type 'string' is not assignable to parameter of type 'VALUE_MAP'.
Using (value: VALUE_MAP) => will solve the issue, but I don't want to do that or may be I want to know why VALUE_MAP is getting used as type
Any help?
javascript reactjs typescript constants
javascript reactjs typescript constants
edited Nov 21 at 16:37
asked Nov 20 at 14:13
Rahul Sagore
7081028
7081028
2
i'd use an enum for this case.
– Daniel A. White
Nov 20 at 14:17
to clarify if your object was like thisconst VALUE_MAP = { value1: 'valueA', value2: 'valueB', value3: 'valueC' }when calling hasValue you would passvalue1orvalueA?
– RezaRahmati
Nov 20 at 14:19
It's inferring the type from the way you've declaredVALUE_MAP. I'm guessing thatconst VALUE_MAP: any = {...}would solve this in this case, but is a workaround.... enum is def the way to go per @DanielA.White comment.
– cale_b
Nov 20 at 14:19
@DanielA.White Forgot to mention butVALUE_MAPis enum.
– Rahul Sagore
Nov 21 at 16:24
@DanielA.White Thanks for hint, ChangingVALUE_MAPto const fixed the errors.
– Rahul Sagore
Nov 21 at 16:48
add a comment |
2
i'd use an enum for this case.
– Daniel A. White
Nov 20 at 14:17
to clarify if your object was like thisconst VALUE_MAP = { value1: 'valueA', value2: 'valueB', value3: 'valueC' }when calling hasValue you would passvalue1orvalueA?
– RezaRahmati
Nov 20 at 14:19
It's inferring the type from the way you've declaredVALUE_MAP. I'm guessing thatconst VALUE_MAP: any = {...}would solve this in this case, but is a workaround.... enum is def the way to go per @DanielA.White comment.
– cale_b
Nov 20 at 14:19
@DanielA.White Forgot to mention butVALUE_MAPis enum.
– Rahul Sagore
Nov 21 at 16:24
@DanielA.White Thanks for hint, ChangingVALUE_MAPto const fixed the errors.
– Rahul Sagore
Nov 21 at 16:48
2
2
i'd use an enum for this case.
– Daniel A. White
Nov 20 at 14:17
i'd use an enum for this case.
– Daniel A. White
Nov 20 at 14:17
to clarify if your object was like this
const VALUE_MAP = { value1: 'valueA', value2: 'valueB', value3: 'valueC' } when calling hasValue you would pass value1 or valueA?– RezaRahmati
Nov 20 at 14:19
to clarify if your object was like this
const VALUE_MAP = { value1: 'valueA', value2: 'valueB', value3: 'valueC' } when calling hasValue you would pass value1 or valueA?– RezaRahmati
Nov 20 at 14:19
It's inferring the type from the way you've declared
VALUE_MAP. I'm guessing that const VALUE_MAP: any = {...} would solve this in this case, but is a workaround.... enum is def the way to go per @DanielA.White comment.– cale_b
Nov 20 at 14:19
It's inferring the type from the way you've declared
VALUE_MAP. I'm guessing that const VALUE_MAP: any = {...} would solve this in this case, but is a workaround.... enum is def the way to go per @DanielA.White comment.– cale_b
Nov 20 at 14:19
@DanielA.White Forgot to mention but
VALUE_MAP is enum.– Rahul Sagore
Nov 21 at 16:24
@DanielA.White Forgot to mention but
VALUE_MAP is enum.– Rahul Sagore
Nov 21 at 16:24
@DanielA.White Thanks for hint, Changing
VALUE_MAP to const fixed the errors.– Rahul Sagore
Nov 21 at 16:48
@DanielA.White Thanks for hint, Changing
VALUE_MAP to const fixed the errors.– Rahul Sagore
Nov 21 at 16:48
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
You should use:
export const hasValue = (value) => SOME_CONSTANT.includes(value);
Without string for param.
If you use Babel plugins, this will strip parameter types during transpiling.
Input:
function foo(one: string, two: number): string {}
Output:
function foo(one, two) {}
So, parameter types are not valid in ES6. You can use them if the code is transpiled using Babel(with the stripping plugins).
The question is tagged withTypeScript, so I would guess the TypeScript compiler is being used.
– Fenton
Nov 20 at 14:33
Removing string inone: stringworks. But if useSOME_CONSTANTsomewhere else, like in render method, it gives same error . LikeSOME_CONSTANT.includes(this.props.value)gives error.
– Rahul Sagore
Nov 21 at 16:35
add a comment |
You need to target ES2016 or newer if you want to use Array.includes as it didn't exist in ECMAScript 5.
For example, this tsconfig.json fails with the error you describe:
{
"compilerOptions": {
"target": "ES5"
}
}
And this tsconfig.json doesn't:
{
"compilerOptions": {
"target": "es2016"
}
}
Tried that. Still got the same error
– Rahul Sagore
Nov 21 at 16:27
I have a working version in VSCode with this config. What tools are you using, and how are you compiling?
– Fenton
Nov 22 at 8:38
add a comment |
After @Daniel A. White, pointed that I should be using enum. Then I got a little hint and changed a little bit of code.
So VALUE_MAP was already an enum. I changed it to constant, and it worked. Thanks everyone for you time and suggestion.
Not getting errors now.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53394929%2fconstant-values-as-array-element-gives-error%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You should use:
export const hasValue = (value) => SOME_CONSTANT.includes(value);
Without string for param.
If you use Babel plugins, this will strip parameter types during transpiling.
Input:
function foo(one: string, two: number): string {}
Output:
function foo(one, two) {}
So, parameter types are not valid in ES6. You can use them if the code is transpiled using Babel(with the stripping plugins).
The question is tagged withTypeScript, so I would guess the TypeScript compiler is being used.
– Fenton
Nov 20 at 14:33
Removing string inone: stringworks. But if useSOME_CONSTANTsomewhere else, like in render method, it gives same error . LikeSOME_CONSTANT.includes(this.props.value)gives error.
– Rahul Sagore
Nov 21 at 16:35
add a comment |
You should use:
export const hasValue = (value) => SOME_CONSTANT.includes(value);
Without string for param.
If you use Babel plugins, this will strip parameter types during transpiling.
Input:
function foo(one: string, two: number): string {}
Output:
function foo(one, two) {}
So, parameter types are not valid in ES6. You can use them if the code is transpiled using Babel(with the stripping plugins).
The question is tagged withTypeScript, so I would guess the TypeScript compiler is being used.
– Fenton
Nov 20 at 14:33
Removing string inone: stringworks. But if useSOME_CONSTANTsomewhere else, like in render method, it gives same error . LikeSOME_CONSTANT.includes(this.props.value)gives error.
– Rahul Sagore
Nov 21 at 16:35
add a comment |
You should use:
export const hasValue = (value) => SOME_CONSTANT.includes(value);
Without string for param.
If you use Babel plugins, this will strip parameter types during transpiling.
Input:
function foo(one: string, two: number): string {}
Output:
function foo(one, two) {}
So, parameter types are not valid in ES6. You can use them if the code is transpiled using Babel(with the stripping plugins).
You should use:
export const hasValue = (value) => SOME_CONSTANT.includes(value);
Without string for param.
If you use Babel plugins, this will strip parameter types during transpiling.
Input:
function foo(one: string, two: number): string {}
Output:
function foo(one, two) {}
So, parameter types are not valid in ES6. You can use them if the code is transpiled using Babel(with the stripping plugins).
answered Nov 20 at 14:22
oma
83447
83447
The question is tagged withTypeScript, so I would guess the TypeScript compiler is being used.
– Fenton
Nov 20 at 14:33
Removing string inone: stringworks. But if useSOME_CONSTANTsomewhere else, like in render method, it gives same error . LikeSOME_CONSTANT.includes(this.props.value)gives error.
– Rahul Sagore
Nov 21 at 16:35
add a comment |
The question is tagged withTypeScript, so I would guess the TypeScript compiler is being used.
– Fenton
Nov 20 at 14:33
Removing string inone: stringworks. But if useSOME_CONSTANTsomewhere else, like in render method, it gives same error . LikeSOME_CONSTANT.includes(this.props.value)gives error.
– Rahul Sagore
Nov 21 at 16:35
The question is tagged with
TypeScript, so I would guess the TypeScript compiler is being used.– Fenton
Nov 20 at 14:33
The question is tagged with
TypeScript, so I would guess the TypeScript compiler is being used.– Fenton
Nov 20 at 14:33
Removing string in
one: string works. But if use SOME_CONSTANT somewhere else, like in render method, it gives same error . Like SOME_CONSTANT.includes(this.props.value) gives error.– Rahul Sagore
Nov 21 at 16:35
Removing string in
one: string works. But if use SOME_CONSTANT somewhere else, like in render method, it gives same error . Like SOME_CONSTANT.includes(this.props.value) gives error.– Rahul Sagore
Nov 21 at 16:35
add a comment |
You need to target ES2016 or newer if you want to use Array.includes as it didn't exist in ECMAScript 5.
For example, this tsconfig.json fails with the error you describe:
{
"compilerOptions": {
"target": "ES5"
}
}
And this tsconfig.json doesn't:
{
"compilerOptions": {
"target": "es2016"
}
}
Tried that. Still got the same error
– Rahul Sagore
Nov 21 at 16:27
I have a working version in VSCode with this config. What tools are you using, and how are you compiling?
– Fenton
Nov 22 at 8:38
add a comment |
You need to target ES2016 or newer if you want to use Array.includes as it didn't exist in ECMAScript 5.
For example, this tsconfig.json fails with the error you describe:
{
"compilerOptions": {
"target": "ES5"
}
}
And this tsconfig.json doesn't:
{
"compilerOptions": {
"target": "es2016"
}
}
Tried that. Still got the same error
– Rahul Sagore
Nov 21 at 16:27
I have a working version in VSCode with this config. What tools are you using, and how are you compiling?
– Fenton
Nov 22 at 8:38
add a comment |
You need to target ES2016 or newer if you want to use Array.includes as it didn't exist in ECMAScript 5.
For example, this tsconfig.json fails with the error you describe:
{
"compilerOptions": {
"target": "ES5"
}
}
And this tsconfig.json doesn't:
{
"compilerOptions": {
"target": "es2016"
}
}
You need to target ES2016 or newer if you want to use Array.includes as it didn't exist in ECMAScript 5.
For example, this tsconfig.json fails with the error you describe:
{
"compilerOptions": {
"target": "ES5"
}
}
And this tsconfig.json doesn't:
{
"compilerOptions": {
"target": "es2016"
}
}
answered Nov 20 at 14:39
Fenton
151k42285309
151k42285309
Tried that. Still got the same error
– Rahul Sagore
Nov 21 at 16:27
I have a working version in VSCode with this config. What tools are you using, and how are you compiling?
– Fenton
Nov 22 at 8:38
add a comment |
Tried that. Still got the same error
– Rahul Sagore
Nov 21 at 16:27
I have a working version in VSCode with this config. What tools are you using, and how are you compiling?
– Fenton
Nov 22 at 8:38
Tried that. Still got the same error
– Rahul Sagore
Nov 21 at 16:27
Tried that. Still got the same error
– Rahul Sagore
Nov 21 at 16:27
I have a working version in VSCode with this config. What tools are you using, and how are you compiling?
– Fenton
Nov 22 at 8:38
I have a working version in VSCode with this config. What tools are you using, and how are you compiling?
– Fenton
Nov 22 at 8:38
add a comment |
After @Daniel A. White, pointed that I should be using enum. Then I got a little hint and changed a little bit of code.
So VALUE_MAP was already an enum. I changed it to constant, and it worked. Thanks everyone for you time and suggestion.
Not getting errors now.
add a comment |
After @Daniel A. White, pointed that I should be using enum. Then I got a little hint and changed a little bit of code.
So VALUE_MAP was already an enum. I changed it to constant, and it worked. Thanks everyone for you time and suggestion.
Not getting errors now.
add a comment |
After @Daniel A. White, pointed that I should be using enum. Then I got a little hint and changed a little bit of code.
So VALUE_MAP was already an enum. I changed it to constant, and it worked. Thanks everyone for you time and suggestion.
Not getting errors now.
After @Daniel A. White, pointed that I should be using enum. Then I got a little hint and changed a little bit of code.
So VALUE_MAP was already an enum. I changed it to constant, and it worked. Thanks everyone for you time and suggestion.
Not getting errors now.
answered Nov 22 at 10:52
Rahul Sagore
7081028
7081028
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53394929%2fconstant-values-as-array-element-gives-error%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
i'd use an enum for this case.
– Daniel A. White
Nov 20 at 14:17
to clarify if your object was like this
const VALUE_MAP = { value1: 'valueA', value2: 'valueB', value3: 'valueC' }when calling hasValue you would passvalue1orvalueA?– RezaRahmati
Nov 20 at 14:19
It's inferring the type from the way you've declared
VALUE_MAP. I'm guessing thatconst VALUE_MAP: any = {...}would solve this in this case, but is a workaround.... enum is def the way to go per @DanielA.White comment.– cale_b
Nov 20 at 14:19
@DanielA.White Forgot to mention but
VALUE_MAPis enum.– Rahul Sagore
Nov 21 at 16:24
@DanielA.White Thanks for hint, Changing
VALUE_MAPto const fixed the errors.– Rahul Sagore
Nov 21 at 16:48