Non-Relativistic Limit of Klein-Gordon Probability Density












2














In the lecture notes accompanying an introductory course in relativistic quantum mechanics, the Klein-Gordon probability density and current are defined as:
$$
begin{eqnarray}
P & = & dfrac{ihbar}{2mc^2}left(Phi^*dfrac{partialPhi}{partial t}-Phidfrac{partialPhi^*}{partial t}right) \
vec{j} &=& dfrac{hbar}{2mi}left(Phi^*vec{nabla}Phi-Phivec{nabla}Phi^*right)
end{eqnarray}
$$
together with the statement that:




One can show that in the non-relativistic limit, the known expressions for the probability density and current are recovered.




The 'known' expressions are:
$$
begin{eqnarray}
rho &=& Psi^*Psi \
vec{j} &=& dfrac{hbar}{2mi}left(Psi^*vec{nabla}Psi-Psivec{nabla}Psi^*right)
end{eqnarray}
$$



When taking a 'non-relativistic limit', I am used to taking the limit $c to infty$, which does give the right result for $vec{j}$, but for the density produces $P=0$. How should one then take said limit to recover the non-relativistic equations?






quantum-mechanics wavefunction speed-of-light schroedinger-equation klein-gordon-equation







share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    For a connection between Schr. eq. and Klein-Gordon eq, see e.g. A. Zee, QFT in a Nutshell, Chap. III.5, and this Phys.SE post plus links therein.
    – Qmechanic♦
    5 hours ago
















2














In the lecture notes accompanying an introductory course in relativistic quantum mechanics, the Klein-Gordon probability density and current are defined as:
$$
begin{eqnarray}
P & = & dfrac{ihbar}{2mc^2}left(Phi^*dfrac{partialPhi}{partial t}-Phidfrac{partialPhi^*}{partial t}right) \
vec{j} &=& dfrac{hbar}{2mi}left(Phi^*vec{nabla}Phi-Phivec{nabla}Phi^*right)
end{eqnarray}
$$
together with the statement that:




One can show that in the non-relativistic limit, the known expressions for the probability density and current are recovered.




The 'known' expressions are:
$$
begin{eqnarray}
rho &=& Psi^*Psi \
vec{j} &=& dfrac{hbar}{2mi}left(Psi^*vec{nabla}Psi-Psivec{nabla}Psi^*right)
end{eqnarray}
$$



When taking a 'non-relativistic limit', I am used to taking the limit $c to infty$, which does give the right result for $vec{j}$, but for the density produces $P=0$. How should one then take said limit to recover the non-relativistic equations?






quantum-mechanics wavefunction speed-of-light schroedinger-equation klein-gordon-equation







share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    For a connection between Schr. eq. and Klein-Gordon eq, see e.g. A. Zee, QFT in a Nutshell, Chap. III.5, and this Phys.SE post plus links therein.
    – Qmechanic♦
    5 hours ago














2












2








2


1





In the lecture notes accompanying an introductory course in relativistic quantum mechanics, the Klein-Gordon probability density and current are defined as:
$$
begin{eqnarray}
P & = & dfrac{ihbar}{2mc^2}left(Phi^*dfrac{partialPhi}{partial t}-Phidfrac{partialPhi^*}{partial t}right) \
vec{j} &=& dfrac{hbar}{2mi}left(Phi^*vec{nabla}Phi-Phivec{nabla}Phi^*right)
end{eqnarray}
$$
together with the statement that:




One can show that in the non-relativistic limit, the known expressions for the probability density and current are recovered.




The 'known' expressions are:
$$
begin{eqnarray}
rho &=& Psi^*Psi \
vec{j} &=& dfrac{hbar}{2mi}left(Psi^*vec{nabla}Psi-Psivec{nabla}Psi^*right)
end{eqnarray}
$$



When taking a 'non-relativistic limit', I am used to taking the limit $c to infty$, which does give the right result for $vec{j}$, but for the density produces $P=0$. How should one then take said limit to recover the non-relativistic equations?






quantum-mechanics wavefunction speed-of-light schroedinger-equation klein-gordon-equation







share|cite|improve this question















In the lecture notes accompanying an introductory course in relativistic quantum mechanics, the Klein-Gordon probability density and current are defined as:
$$
begin{eqnarray}
P & = & dfrac{ihbar}{2mc^2}left(Phi^*dfrac{partialPhi}{partial t}-Phidfrac{partialPhi^*}{partial t}right) \
vec{j} &=& dfrac{hbar}{2mi}left(Phi^*vec{nabla}Phi-Phivec{nabla}Phi^*right)
end{eqnarray}
$$
together with the statement that:




One can show that in the non-relativistic limit, the known expressions for the probability density and current are recovered.




The 'known' expressions are:
$$
begin{eqnarray}
rho &=& Psi^*Psi \
vec{j} &=& dfrac{hbar}{2mi}left(Psi^*vec{nabla}Psi-Psivec{nabla}Psi^*right)
end{eqnarray}
$$



When taking a 'non-relativistic limit', I am used to taking the limit $c to infty$, which does give the right result for $vec{j}$, but for the density produces $P=0$. How should one then take said limit to recover the non-relativistic equations?






quantum-mechanics wavefunction speed-of-light schroedinger-equation klein-gordon-equation




quantum-mechanics wavefunction speed-of-light schroedinger-equation klein-gordon-equation






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago









Qmechanic♦

101k121821140




101k121821140










asked 5 hours ago









Simon

755313




755313








  • 1




    For a connection between Schr. eq. and Klein-Gordon eq, see e.g. A. Zee, QFT in a Nutshell, Chap. III.5, and this Phys.SE post plus links therein.
    – Qmechanic♦
    5 hours ago














  • 1




    For a connection between Schr. eq. and Klein-Gordon eq, see e.g. A. Zee, QFT in a Nutshell, Chap. III.5, and this Phys.SE post plus links therein.
    – Qmechanic♦
    5 hours ago








1




1




For a connection between Schr. eq. and Klein-Gordon eq, see e.g. A. Zee, QFT in a Nutshell, Chap. III.5, and this Phys.SE post plus links therein.
– Qmechanic♦
5 hours ago




For a connection between Schr. eq. and Klein-Gordon eq, see e.g. A. Zee, QFT in a Nutshell, Chap. III.5, and this Phys.SE post plus links therein.
– Qmechanic♦
5 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














You can substitute $Phi = e^{-mc^2t/hbar} Psi$ and then neglect the second order time derivative of $Psi$. Drop the constant $mc^2$ and you will have recovered the Schrödinger equation.






share|cite|improve this answer





























    1














    The trick is to make the approach for the relativistic Klein-Gordon wave function
    $$ Phi(vec{r},t) = Psi(vec{r},t) e^{-frac{imc^2t}{hbar}} $$
    (The physical reasoning behind this approach is:
    The fast oscillating exponential is the solution for the particle at rest.
    And compared to that, $Psi$ will give only slow variations.)



    From that you find its derivatives
    $$
    begin{eqnarray}
    frac{partialPhi}{partial t} &=& left( frac{partialPsi}{partial t} - frac{imc^2}{hbar}Psi right) e^{-frac{imc^2t}{hbar}} \
    vec{nabla}Phi &=& vec{nabla}Psi e^{-frac{imc^2t}{hbar}}
    end{eqnarray}
    $$



    Plug these into the definitions of the Klein-Gordon probability density and current ($P$ and $vec{j}$) and you get
    $$
    begin{eqnarray}
    P &=& Psi^* Psi + frac{ihbar}{2mc^2} left( Psi^*frac{partialPsi}{partial t} - Psi frac{partialPsi^*}{partial t} right) \
    vec{j} &=& dfrac{hbar}{2mi}left(Psi^*vec{nabla}Psi-Psivec{nabla}Psi^*right)
    end{eqnarray}
    $$



    Now you can do the limit $c to infty$ and get the 'known' expressions of the non-relativistic Schrödinger probability density and current.






    share|cite|improve this answer























      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "151"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f450076%2fnon-relativistic-limit-of-klein-gordon-probability-density%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2














      You can substitute $Phi = e^{-mc^2t/hbar} Psi$ and then neglect the second order time derivative of $Psi$. Drop the constant $mc^2$ and you will have recovered the Schrödinger equation.






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        2














        You can substitute $Phi = e^{-mc^2t/hbar} Psi$ and then neglect the second order time derivative of $Psi$. Drop the constant $mc^2$ and you will have recovered the Schrödinger equation.






        share|cite|improve this answer
























          2












          2








          2






          You can substitute $Phi = e^{-mc^2t/hbar} Psi$ and then neglect the second order time derivative of $Psi$. Drop the constant $mc^2$ and you will have recovered the Schrödinger equation.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          You can substitute $Phi = e^{-mc^2t/hbar} Psi$ and then neglect the second order time derivative of $Psi$. Drop the constant $mc^2$ and you will have recovered the Schrödinger equation.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 2 hours ago









          my2cts

          4,4482617




          4,4482617























              1














              The trick is to make the approach for the relativistic Klein-Gordon wave function
              $$ Phi(vec{r},t) = Psi(vec{r},t) e^{-frac{imc^2t}{hbar}} $$
              (The physical reasoning behind this approach is:
              The fast oscillating exponential is the solution for the particle at rest.
              And compared to that, $Psi$ will give only slow variations.)



              From that you find its derivatives
              $$
              begin{eqnarray}
              frac{partialPhi}{partial t} &=& left( frac{partialPsi}{partial t} - frac{imc^2}{hbar}Psi right) e^{-frac{imc^2t}{hbar}} \
              vec{nabla}Phi &=& vec{nabla}Psi e^{-frac{imc^2t}{hbar}}
              end{eqnarray}
              $$



              Plug these into the definitions of the Klein-Gordon probability density and current ($P$ and $vec{j}$) and you get
              $$
              begin{eqnarray}
              P &=& Psi^* Psi + frac{ihbar}{2mc^2} left( Psi^*frac{partialPsi}{partial t} - Psi frac{partialPsi^*}{partial t} right) \
              vec{j} &=& dfrac{hbar}{2mi}left(Psi^*vec{nabla}Psi-Psivec{nabla}Psi^*right)
              end{eqnarray}
              $$



              Now you can do the limit $c to infty$ and get the 'known' expressions of the non-relativistic Schrödinger probability density and current.






              share|cite|improve this answer




























                1














                The trick is to make the approach for the relativistic Klein-Gordon wave function
                $$ Phi(vec{r},t) = Psi(vec{r},t) e^{-frac{imc^2t}{hbar}} $$
                (The physical reasoning behind this approach is:
                The fast oscillating exponential is the solution for the particle at rest.
                And compared to that, $Psi$ will give only slow variations.)



                From that you find its derivatives
                $$
                begin{eqnarray}
                frac{partialPhi}{partial t} &=& left( frac{partialPsi}{partial t} - frac{imc^2}{hbar}Psi right) e^{-frac{imc^2t}{hbar}} \
                vec{nabla}Phi &=& vec{nabla}Psi e^{-frac{imc^2t}{hbar}}
                end{eqnarray}
                $$



                Plug these into the definitions of the Klein-Gordon probability density and current ($P$ and $vec{j}$) and you get
                $$
                begin{eqnarray}
                P &=& Psi^* Psi + frac{ihbar}{2mc^2} left( Psi^*frac{partialPsi}{partial t} - Psi frac{partialPsi^*}{partial t} right) \
                vec{j} &=& dfrac{hbar}{2mi}left(Psi^*vec{nabla}Psi-Psivec{nabla}Psi^*right)
                end{eqnarray}
                $$



                Now you can do the limit $c to infty$ and get the 'known' expressions of the non-relativistic Schrödinger probability density and current.






                share|cite|improve this answer


























                  1












                  1








                  1






                  The trick is to make the approach for the relativistic Klein-Gordon wave function
                  $$ Phi(vec{r},t) = Psi(vec{r},t) e^{-frac{imc^2t}{hbar}} $$
                  (The physical reasoning behind this approach is:
                  The fast oscillating exponential is the solution for the particle at rest.
                  And compared to that, $Psi$ will give only slow variations.)



                  From that you find its derivatives
                  $$
                  begin{eqnarray}
                  frac{partialPhi}{partial t} &=& left( frac{partialPsi}{partial t} - frac{imc^2}{hbar}Psi right) e^{-frac{imc^2t}{hbar}} \
                  vec{nabla}Phi &=& vec{nabla}Psi e^{-frac{imc^2t}{hbar}}
                  end{eqnarray}
                  $$



                  Plug these into the definitions of the Klein-Gordon probability density and current ($P$ and $vec{j}$) and you get
                  $$
                  begin{eqnarray}
                  P &=& Psi^* Psi + frac{ihbar}{2mc^2} left( Psi^*frac{partialPsi}{partial t} - Psi frac{partialPsi^*}{partial t} right) \
                  vec{j} &=& dfrac{hbar}{2mi}left(Psi^*vec{nabla}Psi-Psivec{nabla}Psi^*right)
                  end{eqnarray}
                  $$



                  Now you can do the limit $c to infty$ and get the 'known' expressions of the non-relativistic Schrödinger probability density and current.






                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  The trick is to make the approach for the relativistic Klein-Gordon wave function
                  $$ Phi(vec{r},t) = Psi(vec{r},t) e^{-frac{imc^2t}{hbar}} $$
                  (The physical reasoning behind this approach is:
                  The fast oscillating exponential is the solution for the particle at rest.
                  And compared to that, $Psi$ will give only slow variations.)



                  From that you find its derivatives
                  $$
                  begin{eqnarray}
                  frac{partialPhi}{partial t} &=& left( frac{partialPsi}{partial t} - frac{imc^2}{hbar}Psi right) e^{-frac{imc^2t}{hbar}} \
                  vec{nabla}Phi &=& vec{nabla}Psi e^{-frac{imc^2t}{hbar}}
                  end{eqnarray}
                  $$



                  Plug these into the definitions of the Klein-Gordon probability density and current ($P$ and $vec{j}$) and you get
                  $$
                  begin{eqnarray}
                  P &=& Psi^* Psi + frac{ihbar}{2mc^2} left( Psi^*frac{partialPsi}{partial t} - Psi frac{partialPsi^*}{partial t} right) \
                  vec{j} &=& dfrac{hbar}{2mi}left(Psi^*vec{nabla}Psi-Psivec{nabla}Psi^*right)
                  end{eqnarray}
                  $$



                  Now you can do the limit $c to infty$ and get the 'known' expressions of the non-relativistic Schrödinger probability density and current.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited 42 mins ago

























                  answered 2 hours ago









                  Thomas Fritsch

                  18419




                  18419






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f450076%2fnon-relativistic-limit-of-klein-gordon-probability-density%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      -

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Costa Masnaga

                      Image
                      .mw-parser-output .avviso .mbox-text-div>div,.mw-parser-output .avviso .mbox-text-full-div>div{font-size:90%}.mw-parser-output .avviso .mbox-image div{width:52px}.mw-parser-output .avviso .mbox-text-full-div .hide-when-compact{display:block} Questa voce o sezione sull'argomento Lombardia non cita le fonti necessarie o quelle presenti sono insufficienti . Puoi migliorare questa voce aggiungendo citazioni da fonti attendibili secondo le linee guida sull'uso delle fonti. Segui i suggerimenti del progetto di riferimento. Costa Masnaga comune Localizzazione Stato   Italia Regione Lombardia Provincia Lecco Amministrazione Sindaco Sabina Panzeri (Al centro il cittadino) dall'08/06/2009 Territorio Coordinate 45°46′N 9°17′E  /  45.766667°N 9.283333°E 45.766667; 9.283333  ( Costa Masnaga ) Coordinate: 45°46′N 9°17′E  /  45.766667°N 9.283333°E 45.766667; 9.283333  ( Costa Masnaga ) Altitudine 318 m s.l.m...
                      Read more

                      Fotorealismo

                      Image
                      Guerrino Boatto, Venice's St. Barnaba Church and canal Il fotorealismo è un genere di pittura basato sull'uso di una o più fotografie dalle quali l'artista prende le informazioni necessarie da utilizzare poi nel processo della creazione dell'opera, in genere ad olio o ad acrilico, al fine di avere un aspetto finale il più simile possibile alla fotografia. Indice 1 Storia 2 Lista dei fotorealisti 3 Note 4 Voci correlate 5 Altri progetti Storia | Il fotorealismo è un movimento che nasce negli Stati Uniti d'America alla fine degli anni sessanta [1] sulla scia della Pop Art [2] [3] [4] , e insieme condividono il carattere reazionario verso la travolgente ascesa dei media, che alla metà del ventesimo secolo si trasforma in un fenomeno di massa talmente imponente da minacciare il valore dell'immagine nell'arte. [5] [6] Ne consegue così che, colto il gesto d'inizio che fu della Pop Art, i fotorealisti aprono ad un ...
                      Read more

                      Sidney Franklin

                      Image
                      Questa voce sull'argomento registi statunitensi è solo un abbozzo . Contribuisci a migliorarla secondo le convenzioni di Wikipedia. Sidney Franklin, foto di Carl Van Vechten Oscar alla memoria Irving G. Thalberg 1943 Sidney Franklin , all'anagrafe Sidney Arnold Franklin , (San Francisco, 21 marzo 1893 – Santa Monica, 18 maggio 1972), è stato un regista, produttore cinematografico e attore statunitense. Il 20 giugno 1963, si sposò con l'attrice australiana Enid Bennett. Il matrimonio durò fino alla morte dell'attrice, il 14 maggio 1969 [1] Indice 1 Filmografia 1.1 Regista 1.2 Aiuto regia (parziale) 1.3 Produttore 1.4 Attore (parziale) 2 Note 3 Altri progetti 4 Collegamenti esterni Filmografia | Regista | The Baby , co-regia Chester M. Franklin (1915) The Rivals , co-regia Chester M. Franklin (1915) Little Dick's First Case , co-regia Chester M. Franklin (1915) Her Filmland Hero , co-...
                      Read more