How does Access-Control-Allow-Origin header work?
Apparently, I have completely misunderstood its semantics. I thought of something like this:
- A client downloads javascript code MyCode.js from http://siteA - the origin.
- The response header of MyCode.js contains Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteB, which I thought meant that MyCode.js was allowed to make cross-origin references to the site B.
- The client triggers some functionality of MyCode.js, which in turn make requests to http://siteB, which should be fine, despite being cross-origin requests.
Well, I am wrong. It does not work like this at all. So, I have read Cross-origin resource sharing and attempted to read Cross-Origin Resource Sharing in w3c recommendation
One thing is sure - I still do not understand how am I supposed to use this header.
I have full control of both site A and site B. How do I enable the javascript code downloaded from the site A to access resources on the site B using this header?
P.S.
I do not want to utilize JSONP.
javascript cross-domain cors
add a comment |
Apparently, I have completely misunderstood its semantics. I thought of something like this:
- A client downloads javascript code MyCode.js from http://siteA - the origin.
- The response header of MyCode.js contains Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteB, which I thought meant that MyCode.js was allowed to make cross-origin references to the site B.
- The client triggers some functionality of MyCode.js, which in turn make requests to http://siteB, which should be fine, despite being cross-origin requests.
Well, I am wrong. It does not work like this at all. So, I have read Cross-origin resource sharing and attempted to read Cross-Origin Resource Sharing in w3c recommendation
One thing is sure - I still do not understand how am I supposed to use this header.
I have full control of both site A and site B. How do I enable the javascript code downloaded from the site A to access resources on the site B using this header?
P.S.
I do not want to utilize JSONP.
javascript cross-domain cors
2
I'm not sure, but I believe that setting the header this way allows code on site B to fetchhttp://siteA/MyCode.js.
– pimvdb
May 17 '12 at 13:26
4
But how??? In order to get the header value one has to fetch the resource first, but the resource is cross-origin and so shouldn't the browser block the request in the first place?
– mark
May 17 '12 at 13:33
What you described actually resembles another practice, Content Security Policy
– Alex
Jun 9 '16 at 17:03
2
@mark You don't have to fetch the resource in order to get the headers. The HTTP HEADER method will return headers-only. And in the case of CORS, a preflight check is done using the HTTP OPTIONS method which doesn't return the body either. apsillers answer describes this nicely stackoverflow.com/posts/10636765/revisions.
– Matt
Sep 9 '16 at 23:50
add a comment |
Apparently, I have completely misunderstood its semantics. I thought of something like this:
- A client downloads javascript code MyCode.js from http://siteA - the origin.
- The response header of MyCode.js contains Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteB, which I thought meant that MyCode.js was allowed to make cross-origin references to the site B.
- The client triggers some functionality of MyCode.js, which in turn make requests to http://siteB, which should be fine, despite being cross-origin requests.
Well, I am wrong. It does not work like this at all. So, I have read Cross-origin resource sharing and attempted to read Cross-Origin Resource Sharing in w3c recommendation
One thing is sure - I still do not understand how am I supposed to use this header.
I have full control of both site A and site B. How do I enable the javascript code downloaded from the site A to access resources on the site B using this header?
P.S.
I do not want to utilize JSONP.
javascript cross-domain cors
Apparently, I have completely misunderstood its semantics. I thought of something like this:
- A client downloads javascript code MyCode.js from http://siteA - the origin.
- The response header of MyCode.js contains Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteB, which I thought meant that MyCode.js was allowed to make cross-origin references to the site B.
- The client triggers some functionality of MyCode.js, which in turn make requests to http://siteB, which should be fine, despite being cross-origin requests.
Well, I am wrong. It does not work like this at all. So, I have read Cross-origin resource sharing and attempted to read Cross-Origin Resource Sharing in w3c recommendation
One thing is sure - I still do not understand how am I supposed to use this header.
I have full control of both site A and site B. How do I enable the javascript code downloaded from the site A to access resources on the site B using this header?
P.S.
I do not want to utilize JSONP.
javascript cross-domain cors
javascript cross-domain cors
edited Jul 28 '16 at 9:00
Sujania
3,07563157
3,07563157
asked May 17 '12 at 13:23
markmark
19.8k56186377
19.8k56186377
2
I'm not sure, but I believe that setting the header this way allows code on site B to fetchhttp://siteA/MyCode.js.
– pimvdb
May 17 '12 at 13:26
4
But how??? In order to get the header value one has to fetch the resource first, but the resource is cross-origin and so shouldn't the browser block the request in the first place?
– mark
May 17 '12 at 13:33
What you described actually resembles another practice, Content Security Policy
– Alex
Jun 9 '16 at 17:03
2
@mark You don't have to fetch the resource in order to get the headers. The HTTP HEADER method will return headers-only. And in the case of CORS, a preflight check is done using the HTTP OPTIONS method which doesn't return the body either. apsillers answer describes this nicely stackoverflow.com/posts/10636765/revisions.
– Matt
Sep 9 '16 at 23:50
add a comment |
2
I'm not sure, but I believe that setting the header this way allows code on site B to fetchhttp://siteA/MyCode.js.
– pimvdb
May 17 '12 at 13:26
4
But how??? In order to get the header value one has to fetch the resource first, but the resource is cross-origin and so shouldn't the browser block the request in the first place?
– mark
May 17 '12 at 13:33
What you described actually resembles another practice, Content Security Policy
– Alex
Jun 9 '16 at 17:03
2
@mark You don't have to fetch the resource in order to get the headers. The HTTP HEADER method will return headers-only. And in the case of CORS, a preflight check is done using the HTTP OPTIONS method which doesn't return the body either. apsillers answer describes this nicely stackoverflow.com/posts/10636765/revisions.
– Matt
Sep 9 '16 at 23:50
2
2
I'm not sure, but I believe that setting the header this way allows code on site B to fetch
http://siteA/MyCode.js.– pimvdb
May 17 '12 at 13:26
I'm not sure, but I believe that setting the header this way allows code on site B to fetch
http://siteA/MyCode.js.– pimvdb
May 17 '12 at 13:26
4
4
But how??? In order to get the header value one has to fetch the resource first, but the resource is cross-origin and so shouldn't the browser block the request in the first place?
– mark
May 17 '12 at 13:33
But how??? In order to get the header value one has to fetch the resource first, but the resource is cross-origin and so shouldn't the browser block the request in the first place?
– mark
May 17 '12 at 13:33
What you described actually resembles another practice, Content Security Policy
– Alex
Jun 9 '16 at 17:03
What you described actually resembles another practice, Content Security Policy
– Alex
Jun 9 '16 at 17:03
2
2
@mark You don't have to fetch the resource in order to get the headers. The HTTP HEADER method will return headers-only. And in the case of CORS, a preflight check is done using the HTTP OPTIONS method which doesn't return the body either. apsillers answer describes this nicely stackoverflow.com/posts/10636765/revisions.
– Matt
Sep 9 '16 at 23:50
@mark You don't have to fetch the resource in order to get the headers. The HTTP HEADER method will return headers-only. And in the case of CORS, a preflight check is done using the HTTP OPTIONS method which doesn't return the body either. apsillers answer describes this nicely stackoverflow.com/posts/10636765/revisions.
– Matt
Sep 9 '16 at 23:50
add a comment |
13 Answers
13
active
oldest
votes
Access-Control-Allow-Origin is a CORS (Cross-Origin Resource Sharing) header.
When Site A tries to fetch content from Site B, Site B can send an Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header to tell the browser that the content of this page is accessible to certain origins. (An origin is a domain, plus a scheme and port number.) By default, Site B's pages are not accessible to any other origin; using the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header opens a door for cross-origin access by specific requesting origins.
For each resource/page that Site B wants to make accessible to Site A, Site B should serve its pages with the response header:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteA.com
Modern browsers will not block cross-domain requests outright. If Site A requests a page from Site B, the browser will actually fetch the requested page on the network level and check if the response headers list Site A as a permitted requester domain. If Site B has not indicated that Site A is allowed to access this page, the browser will trigger the XMLHttpRequest's error event and deny the response data to the requesting JavaScript code.
Non-simple requests
What happens on the network level can be slightly more complex than explained above. If the request is a "non-simple" request, the browser first sends a data-less "preflight" OPTIONS request, to verify that the server will accept the request. A request is non-simple when either (or both):
- using an HTTP verb other than GET or POST (e.g. PUT, DELETE)
- using non-simple request headers; the only simple requests headers are:
AcceptAccept-LanguageContent-Language
Content-Type(this is only simple when its value isapplication/x-www-form-urlencoded,multipart/form-data, ortext/plain)
If the server responds to the OPTIONS preflight with appropriate response headers (Access-Control-Allow-Headers for non-simple headers, Access-Control-Allow-Methods for non-simple verbs) that match the non-simple verb and/or non-simple headers, then the browser sends the actual request.
Supposing that Site A wants to send a PUT request for /somePage, with a non-simple Content-Type value of application/json, the browser would first send a preflight request:
OPTIONS /somePage HTTP/1.1
Origin: http://siteA.com
Access-Control-Request-Method: PUT
Access-Control-Request-Headers: Content-Type
Note that Access-Control-Request-Method and Access-Control-Request-Headers are added by the browser automatically; you do not need to add them. This OPTIONS preflight gets the successful response headers:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteA.com
Access-Control-Allow-Methods: GET, POST, PUT
Access-Control-Allow-Headers: Content-Type
When sending the actual request (after preflight is done), the behavior is identical to how a simple request is handled. In other words, a non-simple request whose preflight is successful is treated the same as a simple request (i.e., the server must still send Access-Control-Allow-Origin again for the actual response).
The browsers sends the actual request:
PUT /somePage HTTP/1.1
Origin: http://siteA.com
Content-Type: application/json
{ "myRequestContent": "JSON is so great" }
And the server sends back an Access-Control-Allow-Origin, just as it would for a simple request:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteA.com
See Understanding XMLHttpRequest over CORS for a little more information about non-simple requests.
4
But MyCode.js cannot reach for site B in the first place! How will this header arrive at the client? BTW, kudos for the light life glider in the avatar.
– mark
May 17 '12 at 13:36
5
I edited with clarification: the browser actually does perform a network fetch on site B to check theAccess-Control-Allow-Originheader, but it might not provide the response to the JS code on site A if the header doesn't allow site A to have it. (P.S. Thanks :) )
– apsillers
May 17 '12 at 13:41
2
Indeed, I do not see any record of the download in Fiddler, unless the cross-origin request is approved. Interesting...
– mark
May 17 '12 at 14:18
14
@Jwan622 A fundamental "why?" question like that is probably out of scope for this particular answer, which is just about rules & mechanics. Basically, the browser allows you, the human sitting at the computer, see any resource from any origin. It disallows scripts (which could be written by anyone) from reading resources from origins that are different from the origin of the page running the script. Some related questions are programmers.stackexchange.com/q/216605 and What is the threat model for the same origin policy?
– apsillers
Jul 12 '15 at 17:55
2
In case of using an authentication,Access-Control-Allow-Origindoes not accept the*in some browsers (FF and Chrome AFAIK). So in this case you have to specify the value from theOriginheader. Hope that this will help someone.
– Zsolti
Sep 9 '16 at 19:59
|
show 7 more comments
Cross-Origin Request Sharing - CORS (A.K.A. Cross-Domain AJAX request) is an issue that most web developers might encounter, according to Same-Origin-Policy, browsers restrict client JavaScript in a security sandbox, usually JS cannot directly communicate with a remote server from a different domain. In the past developers created many tricky ways to achieve Cross-Domain resource request, most commonly using ways are:
- Use Flash/Silverlight or server side as a "proxy" to communicate
with remote. - JSON With Padding (JSONP).
- Embeds remote server in an iframe and communicate through fragment or window.name, refer here.
Those tricky ways have more or less some issues, for example JSONP might result in security hole if developers simply "eval" it, and #3 above, although it works, both domains should build strict contract between each other, it neither flexible nor elegant IMHO:)
W3C had introduced Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) as a standard solution to provide a safe, flexible and a recommended standard way to solve this issue.
The Mechanism
From a high level we can simply deem CORS is a contract between client AJAX call from domain A and a page hosted on domain B, a typical Cross-Origin request/response would be:
DomainA AJAX request headers
Host DomainB.com
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0
Accept text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8,application/json
Accept-Language en-us;
Accept-Encoding gzip, deflate
Keep-Alive 115
Origin http://DomainA.com
DomainB response headers
Cache-Control private
Content-Type application/json; charset=utf-8
Access-Control-Allow-Origin DomainA.com
Content-Length 87
Proxy-Connection Keep-Alive
Connection Keep-Alive
The blue parts I marked above were the kernal facts, "Origin" request header "indicates where the cross-origin request or preflight request originates from", the "Access-Control-Allow-Origin" response header indicates this page allows remote request from DomainA (if the value is * indicate allows remote requests from any domain).
As I mentioned above, W3 recommended browser to implement a "preflight request" before submiting the actually Cross-Origin HTTP request, in a nutshell it is an HTTP OPTIONS request:
OPTIONS DomainB.com/foo.aspx HTTP/1.1
If foo.aspx supports OPTIONS HTTP verb, it might return response like below:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2011 15:38:19 GMT
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://DomainA.com
Access-Control-Allow-Methods: POST, GET, OPTIONS, HEAD
Access-Control-Allow-Headers: X-Requested-With
Access-Control-Max-Age: 1728000
Connection: Keep-Alive
Content-Type: application/json
Only if the response contains "Access-Control-Allow-Origin" AND its value is "*" or contain the domain who submitted the CORS request, by satisfying this mandtory condition browser will submit the actual Cross-Domain request, and cache the result in "Preflight-Result-Cache".
I blogged about CORS three years ago: AJAX Cross-Origin HTTP request
This answer made me realize why i was suddenly getting an issue without using this header for POST and GET requests. I had accidently opened the index.html file directly from disk, so the URL the client was accessing on node.js was thought to be cross-domain, while it was simply running on localhost. Accessing via the URL (as one would usually do) "solved" my issue...
– LuqJensen
Jan 8 '17 at 21:06
Would a domain in an external network able to communite with a domain on an internal network?
– Si8
Mar 31 '17 at 1:47
add a comment |
Question is a bit too old to answer, but I am posting this for any future reference to this question.
According to this Mozilla Developer Network article,
A resource makes a cross-origin HTTP request when it requests a resource from a different domain, or port than the one which the first resource itself serves.

An HTML page served from http://domain-a.com makes an <img> src request for http://domain-b.com/image.jpg.
Many pages on the web today load resources like CSS stylesheets, images and scripts from separate domains (thus it should be cool).
Same-Origin Policy
For security reasons, browsers restrict cross-origin HTTP requests initiated from within scripts.
For example, XMLHttpRequest and Fetch follow the same-origin policy.
So, a web application using XMLHttpRequest or Fetch could only make HTTP requests to its own domain.
Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS)
To improve web applications, developers asked browser vendors to allow cross-domain requests.
The Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) mechanism gives web servers cross-domain access controls, which enable secure cross-domain data transfers.
Modern browsers use CORS in an API container - such as XMLHttpRequest or Fetch - to mitigate risks of cross-origin HTTP requests.
How CORS works (Access-Control-Allow-Origin header)
Wikipedia:
The CORS standard describes new HTTP headers which provide browsers and servers a way to request remote URLs only when they have permission.
Although some validation and authorization can be performed by the server, it is generally the browser's responsibility to support these headers and honor the restrictions they impose.
Example
The browser sends the
OPTIONSrequest with anOrigin HTTPheader.
The value of this header is the domain that served the parent page. When a page from
http://www.example.comattempts to access a user's data inservice.example.com, the following request header would be sent toservice.example.com:
Origin: http://www.example.com
The server at
service.example.commay respond with:
An
Access-Control-Allow-Origin(ACAO) header in its response indicating which origin sites are allowed.
For example:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://www.example.com
An error page if the server does not allow the cross-origin request
An
Access-Control-Allow-Origin(ACAO) header with a wildcard that allows all domains:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *
How to set none are allowed to acees some thing likeAccess-Control-Allow-Origin:null
– Subin C Poonamgode
Aug 25 '17 at 6:18
When I don't want to allow anyone to access my resources through CORS, what value should I set forAccess-Control-Allow-Origin? I mean the negation ofAccess-Control-Allow-Origin: *
– Subin C Poonamgode
Aug 31 '17 at 13:54
Just dont set anything, for that purpose
– Trix
Aug 31 '17 at 13:56
add a comment |
If you want just to test a cross domain application in which the browser blocks your request, then you can just open your browser in unsafe mode and test your application without changing your code and without making your code unsafe.
From MAC OS you can do this from the terminal line:
open -a Google Chrome --args --disable-web-security --user-data-dir
add a comment |
Using React and Axios, join proxy link to the URL and add header as shown below
https://cors-anywhere.herokuapp.com/ + Your API URL
Just by adding the Proxy link will work, but it can also throw error for No Access again. Hence better to add header as shown below.
axios.get(`https://cors-anywhere.herokuapp.com/[YOUR_API_URL]`,{headers: {'Access-Control-Allow-Origin': '*'}})
.then(response => console.log(response:data);
}
2
Please don't do this. Using a proxy link is like handing over user cookies to a middle-man. Should be illegal IMHO
– captainserious
Dec 9 '17 at 10:12
Thanks for sharing this! You saved my day. You think I can use this hack on production?
– blvckasvp
Oct 19 '18 at 1:18
add a comment |
Whenever I start thinking about CORS, my intuition about which site hosts the headers is incorrect, just as you described in your question. For me, it helps to think about the purpose of the same origin policy.
The purpose of the same origin policy is to protect you from malicious JavaScript on siteA.com accessing private information you've chosen to share only with siteB.com. Without the same origin policy, JavaScript written by the authors of siteA.com could make your browser make requests to siteB.com, using your authentication cookies for siteB.com. In this way, siteA.com could steal the secret information you share with siteB.com.
Sometimes you need to work cross domain, which is where CORS comes in. CORS relaxes the same origin policy for domainA.com, using the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header to list other domains (domainB.com) that are trusted to run JavaScript that can interact with domainA.com.
To understand which domain should serve the CORS headers, consider this. You visit malicious.com, which contains some JavaScript that tries to make a cross domain request to mybank.com. It should be up to mybank.com, not malicious.com, to decide whether or not it sets CORS headers that relax the same origin policy allowing the JavaScript from malicious.com to interact with it. If malicous.com could set its own CORS headers allowing its own JavaScript access to mybank.com, this would completely nullify the same origin policy.
I think the reason for my bad intuition is the point of view I have when developing a site. It's my site, with all my JavaScript, therefore it isn't doing anything malicious and it should be up to me to specify which other sites my JavaScript can interact with. When in fact I should be thinking which other sites JavaScript are trying to interact with my site and should I use CORS to allow them?
add a comment |
1. A client downloads javascript code MyCode.js from http://siteA - the origin.
The code that does the downloading - your html script tag or xhr from javascript or whatever - came from, let's say, http://siteZ. And, when the browser requests MyCode.js, it sends an Origin: header saying "Origin: http://siteZ", because it can see that you're requesting to siteA and siteZ != siteA. (You cannot stop or interfere with this.)
2. The response header of MyCode.js contains Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteB, which I thought meant that MyCode.js was allowed to make cross-origin references to the site B.
no. It means, Only siteB is allowed to do this request. So your request for MyCode.js from siteZ gets an error instead, and the browser typically gives you nothing. But if you make your server return A-C-A-O: siteZ instead, you'll get MyCode.js . Or if it sends '*', that'll work, that'll let everybody in. Or if the server always sends the string from the Origin: header... but... for security, if you're afraid of hackers, your server should only allow origins on a shortlist, that are allowed to make those requests.
Then, MyCode.js comes from siteA. When it makes requests to siteB, they are all cross-origin, the browser sends Origin: siteA, and siteB has to take the siteA, recognize it's on the short list of allowed requesters, and send back A-C-A-O: siteA. Only then will the browser let your script get the result of those requests.
add a comment |
i work with express 4 and node 7.4 and angular,I had the same problem me help this:
a) server side: in file app.js i give headers to all response like:
app.use(function(req, res, next) {
res.header('Access-Control-Allow-Origin', req.headers.origin);
res.header("Access-Control-Allow-Headers", "Origin, X-Requested-With, Content-Type, Accept");
next();
});
this must have before all router.
I saw a lot of added this headers:
res.header("Access-Control-Allow-Headers","*");
res.header('Access-Control-Allow-Credentials', true);
res.header('Access-Control-Allow-Methods', 'GET,PUT,POST,DELETE');
but i dont need that,
b) client side: in send ajax you need add: "withCredentials: true," like:
$http({
method: 'POST',
url: 'url,
withCredentials: true,
data : {}
}).then(function(response){
// code
}, function (response) {
// code
});
good luck.
add a comment |
If you are using PHP, try to add the following code at the beaning of the php file:
if you are using localhost, try this:
header("Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *");
if you are using external domains such as server, try this:
header("Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://www.website.com");
add a comment |
For cross origin sharing, set header: 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin':'*';
Php: header('Access-Control-Allow-Origin':'*');
Node: app.use('Access-Control-Allow-Origin':'*');
This will allow to share content for different domain.
add a comment |
In Python I have been using the Flask-CORS library with great success. It makes dealing with CORS super easy and painless. I added some code from the library's documentation below.
Installing:
$ pip install -U flask-cors
Simple example that allows CORS for all domains on all routes:
from flask import Flask
from flask_cors import CORS
app = Flask(__name__)
CORS(app)
@app.route("/")
def helloWorld():
return "Hello, cross-origin-world!"
For more specific examples see the documentation. I have used the simple example above to get around the CORS issue in an ionic application I am building that has to access a separate flask server.
add a comment |
Simply paste the following code in your web.config file.
Noted that, you have to paste the following code under <system.webServer> tag
<httpProtocol>
<customHeaders>
<add name="Access-Control-Allow-Origin" value="*" />
<add name="Access-Control-Allow-Headers" value="Content-Type" />
<add name="Access-Control-Allow-Methods" value="GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, OPTIONS" />
</customHeaders>
</httpProtocol>
add a comment |
The Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header indicates whether the
response can be shared with requesting code from the given origin.
Header type Response header
Forbidden header name no
A response that tells the browser to allow code from any origin to
access a resource will include the following:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *
For more info, visit here....
add a comment |
protected by Community♦ May 16 '17 at 19:30
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
13 Answers
13
active
oldest
votes
13 Answers
13
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Access-Control-Allow-Origin is a CORS (Cross-Origin Resource Sharing) header.
When Site A tries to fetch content from Site B, Site B can send an Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header to tell the browser that the content of this page is accessible to certain origins. (An origin is a domain, plus a scheme and port number.) By default, Site B's pages are not accessible to any other origin; using the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header opens a door for cross-origin access by specific requesting origins.
For each resource/page that Site B wants to make accessible to Site A, Site B should serve its pages with the response header:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteA.com
Modern browsers will not block cross-domain requests outright. If Site A requests a page from Site B, the browser will actually fetch the requested page on the network level and check if the response headers list Site A as a permitted requester domain. If Site B has not indicated that Site A is allowed to access this page, the browser will trigger the XMLHttpRequest's error event and deny the response data to the requesting JavaScript code.
Non-simple requests
What happens on the network level can be slightly more complex than explained above. If the request is a "non-simple" request, the browser first sends a data-less "preflight" OPTIONS request, to verify that the server will accept the request. A request is non-simple when either (or both):
- using an HTTP verb other than GET or POST (e.g. PUT, DELETE)
- using non-simple request headers; the only simple requests headers are:
AcceptAccept-LanguageContent-Language
Content-Type(this is only simple when its value isapplication/x-www-form-urlencoded,multipart/form-data, ortext/plain)
If the server responds to the OPTIONS preflight with appropriate response headers (Access-Control-Allow-Headers for non-simple headers, Access-Control-Allow-Methods for non-simple verbs) that match the non-simple verb and/or non-simple headers, then the browser sends the actual request.
Supposing that Site A wants to send a PUT request for /somePage, with a non-simple Content-Type value of application/json, the browser would first send a preflight request:
OPTIONS /somePage HTTP/1.1
Origin: http://siteA.com
Access-Control-Request-Method: PUT
Access-Control-Request-Headers: Content-Type
Note that Access-Control-Request-Method and Access-Control-Request-Headers are added by the browser automatically; you do not need to add them. This OPTIONS preflight gets the successful response headers:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteA.com
Access-Control-Allow-Methods: GET, POST, PUT
Access-Control-Allow-Headers: Content-Type
When sending the actual request (after preflight is done), the behavior is identical to how a simple request is handled. In other words, a non-simple request whose preflight is successful is treated the same as a simple request (i.e., the server must still send Access-Control-Allow-Origin again for the actual response).
The browsers sends the actual request:
PUT /somePage HTTP/1.1
Origin: http://siteA.com
Content-Type: application/json
{ "myRequestContent": "JSON is so great" }
And the server sends back an Access-Control-Allow-Origin, just as it would for a simple request:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteA.com
See Understanding XMLHttpRequest over CORS for a little more information about non-simple requests.
4
But MyCode.js cannot reach for site B in the first place! How will this header arrive at the client? BTW, kudos for the light life glider in the avatar.
– mark
May 17 '12 at 13:36
5
I edited with clarification: the browser actually does perform a network fetch on site B to check theAccess-Control-Allow-Originheader, but it might not provide the response to the JS code on site A if the header doesn't allow site A to have it. (P.S. Thanks :) )
– apsillers
May 17 '12 at 13:41
2
Indeed, I do not see any record of the download in Fiddler, unless the cross-origin request is approved. Interesting...
– mark
May 17 '12 at 14:18
14
@Jwan622 A fundamental "why?" question like that is probably out of scope for this particular answer, which is just about rules & mechanics. Basically, the browser allows you, the human sitting at the computer, see any resource from any origin. It disallows scripts (which could be written by anyone) from reading resources from origins that are different from the origin of the page running the script. Some related questions are programmers.stackexchange.com/q/216605 and What is the threat model for the same origin policy?
– apsillers
Jul 12 '15 at 17:55
2
In case of using an authentication,Access-Control-Allow-Origindoes not accept the*in some browsers (FF and Chrome AFAIK). So in this case you have to specify the value from theOriginheader. Hope that this will help someone.
– Zsolti
Sep 9 '16 at 19:59
|
show 7 more comments
Access-Control-Allow-Origin is a CORS (Cross-Origin Resource Sharing) header.
When Site A tries to fetch content from Site B, Site B can send an Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header to tell the browser that the content of this page is accessible to certain origins. (An origin is a domain, plus a scheme and port number.) By default, Site B's pages are not accessible to any other origin; using the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header opens a door for cross-origin access by specific requesting origins.
For each resource/page that Site B wants to make accessible to Site A, Site B should serve its pages with the response header:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteA.com
Modern browsers will not block cross-domain requests outright. If Site A requests a page from Site B, the browser will actually fetch the requested page on the network level and check if the response headers list Site A as a permitted requester domain. If Site B has not indicated that Site A is allowed to access this page, the browser will trigger the XMLHttpRequest's error event and deny the response data to the requesting JavaScript code.
Non-simple requests
What happens on the network level can be slightly more complex than explained above. If the request is a "non-simple" request, the browser first sends a data-less "preflight" OPTIONS request, to verify that the server will accept the request. A request is non-simple when either (or both):
- using an HTTP verb other than GET or POST (e.g. PUT, DELETE)
- using non-simple request headers; the only simple requests headers are:
AcceptAccept-LanguageContent-Language
Content-Type(this is only simple when its value isapplication/x-www-form-urlencoded,multipart/form-data, ortext/plain)
If the server responds to the OPTIONS preflight with appropriate response headers (Access-Control-Allow-Headers for non-simple headers, Access-Control-Allow-Methods for non-simple verbs) that match the non-simple verb and/or non-simple headers, then the browser sends the actual request.
Supposing that Site A wants to send a PUT request for /somePage, with a non-simple Content-Type value of application/json, the browser would first send a preflight request:
OPTIONS /somePage HTTP/1.1
Origin: http://siteA.com
Access-Control-Request-Method: PUT
Access-Control-Request-Headers: Content-Type
Note that Access-Control-Request-Method and Access-Control-Request-Headers are added by the browser automatically; you do not need to add them. This OPTIONS preflight gets the successful response headers:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteA.com
Access-Control-Allow-Methods: GET, POST, PUT
Access-Control-Allow-Headers: Content-Type
When sending the actual request (after preflight is done), the behavior is identical to how a simple request is handled. In other words, a non-simple request whose preflight is successful is treated the same as a simple request (i.e., the server must still send Access-Control-Allow-Origin again for the actual response).
The browsers sends the actual request:
PUT /somePage HTTP/1.1
Origin: http://siteA.com
Content-Type: application/json
{ "myRequestContent": "JSON is so great" }
And the server sends back an Access-Control-Allow-Origin, just as it would for a simple request:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteA.com
See Understanding XMLHttpRequest over CORS for a little more information about non-simple requests.
4
But MyCode.js cannot reach for site B in the first place! How will this header arrive at the client? BTW, kudos for the light life glider in the avatar.
– mark
May 17 '12 at 13:36
5
I edited with clarification: the browser actually does perform a network fetch on site B to check theAccess-Control-Allow-Originheader, but it might not provide the response to the JS code on site A if the header doesn't allow site A to have it. (P.S. Thanks :) )
– apsillers
May 17 '12 at 13:41
2
Indeed, I do not see any record of the download in Fiddler, unless the cross-origin request is approved. Interesting...
– mark
May 17 '12 at 14:18
14
@Jwan622 A fundamental "why?" question like that is probably out of scope for this particular answer, which is just about rules & mechanics. Basically, the browser allows you, the human sitting at the computer, see any resource from any origin. It disallows scripts (which could be written by anyone) from reading resources from origins that are different from the origin of the page running the script. Some related questions are programmers.stackexchange.com/q/216605 and What is the threat model for the same origin policy?
– apsillers
Jul 12 '15 at 17:55
2
In case of using an authentication,Access-Control-Allow-Origindoes not accept the*in some browsers (FF and Chrome AFAIK). So in this case you have to specify the value from theOriginheader. Hope that this will help someone.
– Zsolti
Sep 9 '16 at 19:59
|
show 7 more comments
Access-Control-Allow-Origin is a CORS (Cross-Origin Resource Sharing) header.
When Site A tries to fetch content from Site B, Site B can send an Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header to tell the browser that the content of this page is accessible to certain origins. (An origin is a domain, plus a scheme and port number.) By default, Site B's pages are not accessible to any other origin; using the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header opens a door for cross-origin access by specific requesting origins.
For each resource/page that Site B wants to make accessible to Site A, Site B should serve its pages with the response header:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteA.com
Modern browsers will not block cross-domain requests outright. If Site A requests a page from Site B, the browser will actually fetch the requested page on the network level and check if the response headers list Site A as a permitted requester domain. If Site B has not indicated that Site A is allowed to access this page, the browser will trigger the XMLHttpRequest's error event and deny the response data to the requesting JavaScript code.
Non-simple requests
What happens on the network level can be slightly more complex than explained above. If the request is a "non-simple" request, the browser first sends a data-less "preflight" OPTIONS request, to verify that the server will accept the request. A request is non-simple when either (or both):
- using an HTTP verb other than GET or POST (e.g. PUT, DELETE)
- using non-simple request headers; the only simple requests headers are:
AcceptAccept-LanguageContent-Language
Content-Type(this is only simple when its value isapplication/x-www-form-urlencoded,multipart/form-data, ortext/plain)
If the server responds to the OPTIONS preflight with appropriate response headers (Access-Control-Allow-Headers for non-simple headers, Access-Control-Allow-Methods for non-simple verbs) that match the non-simple verb and/or non-simple headers, then the browser sends the actual request.
Supposing that Site A wants to send a PUT request for /somePage, with a non-simple Content-Type value of application/json, the browser would first send a preflight request:
OPTIONS /somePage HTTP/1.1
Origin: http://siteA.com
Access-Control-Request-Method: PUT
Access-Control-Request-Headers: Content-Type
Note that Access-Control-Request-Method and Access-Control-Request-Headers are added by the browser automatically; you do not need to add them. This OPTIONS preflight gets the successful response headers:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteA.com
Access-Control-Allow-Methods: GET, POST, PUT
Access-Control-Allow-Headers: Content-Type
When sending the actual request (after preflight is done), the behavior is identical to how a simple request is handled. In other words, a non-simple request whose preflight is successful is treated the same as a simple request (i.e., the server must still send Access-Control-Allow-Origin again for the actual response).
The browsers sends the actual request:
PUT /somePage HTTP/1.1
Origin: http://siteA.com
Content-Type: application/json
{ "myRequestContent": "JSON is so great" }
And the server sends back an Access-Control-Allow-Origin, just as it would for a simple request:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteA.com
See Understanding XMLHttpRequest over CORS for a little more information about non-simple requests.
Access-Control-Allow-Origin is a CORS (Cross-Origin Resource Sharing) header.
When Site A tries to fetch content from Site B, Site B can send an Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header to tell the browser that the content of this page is accessible to certain origins. (An origin is a domain, plus a scheme and port number.) By default, Site B's pages are not accessible to any other origin; using the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header opens a door for cross-origin access by specific requesting origins.
For each resource/page that Site B wants to make accessible to Site A, Site B should serve its pages with the response header:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteA.com
Modern browsers will not block cross-domain requests outright. If Site A requests a page from Site B, the browser will actually fetch the requested page on the network level and check if the response headers list Site A as a permitted requester domain. If Site B has not indicated that Site A is allowed to access this page, the browser will trigger the XMLHttpRequest's error event and deny the response data to the requesting JavaScript code.
Non-simple requests
What happens on the network level can be slightly more complex than explained above. If the request is a "non-simple" request, the browser first sends a data-less "preflight" OPTIONS request, to verify that the server will accept the request. A request is non-simple when either (or both):
- using an HTTP verb other than GET or POST (e.g. PUT, DELETE)
- using non-simple request headers; the only simple requests headers are:
AcceptAccept-LanguageContent-Language
Content-Type(this is only simple when its value isapplication/x-www-form-urlencoded,multipart/form-data, ortext/plain)
If the server responds to the OPTIONS preflight with appropriate response headers (Access-Control-Allow-Headers for non-simple headers, Access-Control-Allow-Methods for non-simple verbs) that match the non-simple verb and/or non-simple headers, then the browser sends the actual request.
Supposing that Site A wants to send a PUT request for /somePage, with a non-simple Content-Type value of application/json, the browser would first send a preflight request:
OPTIONS /somePage HTTP/1.1
Origin: http://siteA.com
Access-Control-Request-Method: PUT
Access-Control-Request-Headers: Content-Type
Note that Access-Control-Request-Method and Access-Control-Request-Headers are added by the browser automatically; you do not need to add them. This OPTIONS preflight gets the successful response headers:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteA.com
Access-Control-Allow-Methods: GET, POST, PUT
Access-Control-Allow-Headers: Content-Type
When sending the actual request (after preflight is done), the behavior is identical to how a simple request is handled. In other words, a non-simple request whose preflight is successful is treated the same as a simple request (i.e., the server must still send Access-Control-Allow-Origin again for the actual response).
The browsers sends the actual request:
PUT /somePage HTTP/1.1
Origin: http://siteA.com
Content-Type: application/json
{ "myRequestContent": "JSON is so great" }
And the server sends back an Access-Control-Allow-Origin, just as it would for a simple request:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteA.com
See Understanding XMLHttpRequest over CORS for a little more information about non-simple requests.
edited May 23 '17 at 11:47
Community♦
11
11
answered May 17 '12 at 13:33
apsillersapsillers
82.3k9162189
82.3k9162189
4
But MyCode.js cannot reach for site B in the first place! How will this header arrive at the client? BTW, kudos for the light life glider in the avatar.
– mark
May 17 '12 at 13:36
5
I edited with clarification: the browser actually does perform a network fetch on site B to check theAccess-Control-Allow-Originheader, but it might not provide the response to the JS code on site A if the header doesn't allow site A to have it. (P.S. Thanks :) )
– apsillers
May 17 '12 at 13:41
2
Indeed, I do not see any record of the download in Fiddler, unless the cross-origin request is approved. Interesting...
– mark
May 17 '12 at 14:18
14
@Jwan622 A fundamental "why?" question like that is probably out of scope for this particular answer, which is just about rules & mechanics. Basically, the browser allows you, the human sitting at the computer, see any resource from any origin. It disallows scripts (which could be written by anyone) from reading resources from origins that are different from the origin of the page running the script. Some related questions are programmers.stackexchange.com/q/216605 and What is the threat model for the same origin policy?
– apsillers
Jul 12 '15 at 17:55
2
In case of using an authentication,Access-Control-Allow-Origindoes not accept the*in some browsers (FF and Chrome AFAIK). So in this case you have to specify the value from theOriginheader. Hope that this will help someone.
– Zsolti
Sep 9 '16 at 19:59
|
show 7 more comments
4
But MyCode.js cannot reach for site B in the first place! How will this header arrive at the client? BTW, kudos for the light life glider in the avatar.
– mark
May 17 '12 at 13:36
5
I edited with clarification: the browser actually does perform a network fetch on site B to check theAccess-Control-Allow-Originheader, but it might not provide the response to the JS code on site A if the header doesn't allow site A to have it. (P.S. Thanks :) )
– apsillers
May 17 '12 at 13:41
2
Indeed, I do not see any record of the download in Fiddler, unless the cross-origin request is approved. Interesting...
– mark
May 17 '12 at 14:18
14
@Jwan622 A fundamental "why?" question like that is probably out of scope for this particular answer, which is just about rules & mechanics. Basically, the browser allows you, the human sitting at the computer, see any resource from any origin. It disallows scripts (which could be written by anyone) from reading resources from origins that are different from the origin of the page running the script. Some related questions are programmers.stackexchange.com/q/216605 and What is the threat model for the same origin policy?
– apsillers
Jul 12 '15 at 17:55
2
In case of using an authentication,Access-Control-Allow-Origindoes not accept the*in some browsers (FF and Chrome AFAIK). So in this case you have to specify the value from theOriginheader. Hope that this will help someone.
– Zsolti
Sep 9 '16 at 19:59
4
4
But MyCode.js cannot reach for site B in the first place! How will this header arrive at the client? BTW, kudos for the light life glider in the avatar.
– mark
May 17 '12 at 13:36
But MyCode.js cannot reach for site B in the first place! How will this header arrive at the client? BTW, kudos for the light life glider in the avatar.
– mark
May 17 '12 at 13:36
5
5
I edited with clarification: the browser actually does perform a network fetch on site B to check the
Access-Control-Allow-Origin header, but it might not provide the response to the JS code on site A if the header doesn't allow site A to have it. (P.S. Thanks :) )– apsillers
May 17 '12 at 13:41
I edited with clarification: the browser actually does perform a network fetch on site B to check the
Access-Control-Allow-Origin header, but it might not provide the response to the JS code on site A if the header doesn't allow site A to have it. (P.S. Thanks :) )– apsillers
May 17 '12 at 13:41
2
2
Indeed, I do not see any record of the download in Fiddler, unless the cross-origin request is approved. Interesting...
– mark
May 17 '12 at 14:18
Indeed, I do not see any record of the download in Fiddler, unless the cross-origin request is approved. Interesting...
– mark
May 17 '12 at 14:18
14
14
@Jwan622 A fundamental "why?" question like that is probably out of scope for this particular answer, which is just about rules & mechanics. Basically, the browser allows you, the human sitting at the computer, see any resource from any origin. It disallows scripts (which could be written by anyone) from reading resources from origins that are different from the origin of the page running the script. Some related questions are programmers.stackexchange.com/q/216605 and What is the threat model for the same origin policy?
– apsillers
Jul 12 '15 at 17:55
@Jwan622 A fundamental "why?" question like that is probably out of scope for this particular answer, which is just about rules & mechanics. Basically, the browser allows you, the human sitting at the computer, see any resource from any origin. It disallows scripts (which could be written by anyone) from reading resources from origins that are different from the origin of the page running the script. Some related questions are programmers.stackexchange.com/q/216605 and What is the threat model for the same origin policy?
– apsillers
Jul 12 '15 at 17:55
2
2
In case of using an authentication,
Access-Control-Allow-Origin does not accept the * in some browsers (FF and Chrome AFAIK). So in this case you have to specify the value from the Origin header. Hope that this will help someone.– Zsolti
Sep 9 '16 at 19:59
In case of using an authentication,
Access-Control-Allow-Origin does not accept the * in some browsers (FF and Chrome AFAIK). So in this case you have to specify the value from the Origin header. Hope that this will help someone.– Zsolti
Sep 9 '16 at 19:59
|
show 7 more comments
Cross-Origin Request Sharing - CORS (A.K.A. Cross-Domain AJAX request) is an issue that most web developers might encounter, according to Same-Origin-Policy, browsers restrict client JavaScript in a security sandbox, usually JS cannot directly communicate with a remote server from a different domain. In the past developers created many tricky ways to achieve Cross-Domain resource request, most commonly using ways are:
- Use Flash/Silverlight or server side as a "proxy" to communicate
with remote. - JSON With Padding (JSONP).
- Embeds remote server in an iframe and communicate through fragment or window.name, refer here.
Those tricky ways have more or less some issues, for example JSONP might result in security hole if developers simply "eval" it, and #3 above, although it works, both domains should build strict contract between each other, it neither flexible nor elegant IMHO:)
W3C had introduced Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) as a standard solution to provide a safe, flexible and a recommended standard way to solve this issue.
The Mechanism
From a high level we can simply deem CORS is a contract between client AJAX call from domain A and a page hosted on domain B, a typical Cross-Origin request/response would be:
DomainA AJAX request headers
Host DomainB.com
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0
Accept text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8,application/json
Accept-Language en-us;
Accept-Encoding gzip, deflate
Keep-Alive 115
Origin http://DomainA.com
DomainB response headers
Cache-Control private
Content-Type application/json; charset=utf-8
Access-Control-Allow-Origin DomainA.com
Content-Length 87
Proxy-Connection Keep-Alive
Connection Keep-Alive
The blue parts I marked above were the kernal facts, "Origin" request header "indicates where the cross-origin request or preflight request originates from", the "Access-Control-Allow-Origin" response header indicates this page allows remote request from DomainA (if the value is * indicate allows remote requests from any domain).
As I mentioned above, W3 recommended browser to implement a "preflight request" before submiting the actually Cross-Origin HTTP request, in a nutshell it is an HTTP OPTIONS request:
OPTIONS DomainB.com/foo.aspx HTTP/1.1
If foo.aspx supports OPTIONS HTTP verb, it might return response like below:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2011 15:38:19 GMT
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://DomainA.com
Access-Control-Allow-Methods: POST, GET, OPTIONS, HEAD
Access-Control-Allow-Headers: X-Requested-With
Access-Control-Max-Age: 1728000
Connection: Keep-Alive
Content-Type: application/json
Only if the response contains "Access-Control-Allow-Origin" AND its value is "*" or contain the domain who submitted the CORS request, by satisfying this mandtory condition browser will submit the actual Cross-Domain request, and cache the result in "Preflight-Result-Cache".
I blogged about CORS three years ago: AJAX Cross-Origin HTTP request
This answer made me realize why i was suddenly getting an issue without using this header for POST and GET requests. I had accidently opened the index.html file directly from disk, so the URL the client was accessing on node.js was thought to be cross-domain, while it was simply running on localhost. Accessing via the URL (as one would usually do) "solved" my issue...
– LuqJensen
Jan 8 '17 at 21:06
Would a domain in an external network able to communite with a domain on an internal network?
– Si8
Mar 31 '17 at 1:47
add a comment |
Cross-Origin Request Sharing - CORS (A.K.A. Cross-Domain AJAX request) is an issue that most web developers might encounter, according to Same-Origin-Policy, browsers restrict client JavaScript in a security sandbox, usually JS cannot directly communicate with a remote server from a different domain. In the past developers created many tricky ways to achieve Cross-Domain resource request, most commonly using ways are:
- Use Flash/Silverlight or server side as a "proxy" to communicate
with remote. - JSON With Padding (JSONP).
- Embeds remote server in an iframe and communicate through fragment or window.name, refer here.
Those tricky ways have more or less some issues, for example JSONP might result in security hole if developers simply "eval" it, and #3 above, although it works, both domains should build strict contract between each other, it neither flexible nor elegant IMHO:)
W3C had introduced Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) as a standard solution to provide a safe, flexible and a recommended standard way to solve this issue.
The Mechanism
From a high level we can simply deem CORS is a contract between client AJAX call from domain A and a page hosted on domain B, a typical Cross-Origin request/response would be:
DomainA AJAX request headers
Host DomainB.com
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0
Accept text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8,application/json
Accept-Language en-us;
Accept-Encoding gzip, deflate
Keep-Alive 115
Origin http://DomainA.com
DomainB response headers
Cache-Control private
Content-Type application/json; charset=utf-8
Access-Control-Allow-Origin DomainA.com
Content-Length 87
Proxy-Connection Keep-Alive
Connection Keep-Alive
The blue parts I marked above were the kernal facts, "Origin" request header "indicates where the cross-origin request or preflight request originates from", the "Access-Control-Allow-Origin" response header indicates this page allows remote request from DomainA (if the value is * indicate allows remote requests from any domain).
As I mentioned above, W3 recommended browser to implement a "preflight request" before submiting the actually Cross-Origin HTTP request, in a nutshell it is an HTTP OPTIONS request:
OPTIONS DomainB.com/foo.aspx HTTP/1.1
If foo.aspx supports OPTIONS HTTP verb, it might return response like below:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2011 15:38:19 GMT
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://DomainA.com
Access-Control-Allow-Methods: POST, GET, OPTIONS, HEAD
Access-Control-Allow-Headers: X-Requested-With
Access-Control-Max-Age: 1728000
Connection: Keep-Alive
Content-Type: application/json
Only if the response contains "Access-Control-Allow-Origin" AND its value is "*" or contain the domain who submitted the CORS request, by satisfying this mandtory condition browser will submit the actual Cross-Domain request, and cache the result in "Preflight-Result-Cache".
I blogged about CORS three years ago: AJAX Cross-Origin HTTP request
This answer made me realize why i was suddenly getting an issue without using this header for POST and GET requests. I had accidently opened the index.html file directly from disk, so the URL the client was accessing on node.js was thought to be cross-domain, while it was simply running on localhost. Accessing via the URL (as one would usually do) "solved" my issue...
– LuqJensen
Jan 8 '17 at 21:06
Would a domain in an external network able to communite with a domain on an internal network?
– Si8
Mar 31 '17 at 1:47
add a comment |
Cross-Origin Request Sharing - CORS (A.K.A. Cross-Domain AJAX request) is an issue that most web developers might encounter, according to Same-Origin-Policy, browsers restrict client JavaScript in a security sandbox, usually JS cannot directly communicate with a remote server from a different domain. In the past developers created many tricky ways to achieve Cross-Domain resource request, most commonly using ways are:
- Use Flash/Silverlight or server side as a "proxy" to communicate
with remote. - JSON With Padding (JSONP).
- Embeds remote server in an iframe and communicate through fragment or window.name, refer here.
Those tricky ways have more or less some issues, for example JSONP might result in security hole if developers simply "eval" it, and #3 above, although it works, both domains should build strict contract between each other, it neither flexible nor elegant IMHO:)
W3C had introduced Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) as a standard solution to provide a safe, flexible and a recommended standard way to solve this issue.
The Mechanism
From a high level we can simply deem CORS is a contract between client AJAX call from domain A and a page hosted on domain B, a typical Cross-Origin request/response would be:
DomainA AJAX request headers
Host DomainB.com
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0
Accept text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8,application/json
Accept-Language en-us;
Accept-Encoding gzip, deflate
Keep-Alive 115
Origin http://DomainA.com
DomainB response headers
Cache-Control private
Content-Type application/json; charset=utf-8
Access-Control-Allow-Origin DomainA.com
Content-Length 87
Proxy-Connection Keep-Alive
Connection Keep-Alive
The blue parts I marked above were the kernal facts, "Origin" request header "indicates where the cross-origin request or preflight request originates from", the "Access-Control-Allow-Origin" response header indicates this page allows remote request from DomainA (if the value is * indicate allows remote requests from any domain).
As I mentioned above, W3 recommended browser to implement a "preflight request" before submiting the actually Cross-Origin HTTP request, in a nutshell it is an HTTP OPTIONS request:
OPTIONS DomainB.com/foo.aspx HTTP/1.1
If foo.aspx supports OPTIONS HTTP verb, it might return response like below:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2011 15:38:19 GMT
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://DomainA.com
Access-Control-Allow-Methods: POST, GET, OPTIONS, HEAD
Access-Control-Allow-Headers: X-Requested-With
Access-Control-Max-Age: 1728000
Connection: Keep-Alive
Content-Type: application/json
Only if the response contains "Access-Control-Allow-Origin" AND its value is "*" or contain the domain who submitted the CORS request, by satisfying this mandtory condition browser will submit the actual Cross-Domain request, and cache the result in "Preflight-Result-Cache".
I blogged about CORS three years ago: AJAX Cross-Origin HTTP request
Cross-Origin Request Sharing - CORS (A.K.A. Cross-Domain AJAX request) is an issue that most web developers might encounter, according to Same-Origin-Policy, browsers restrict client JavaScript in a security sandbox, usually JS cannot directly communicate with a remote server from a different domain. In the past developers created many tricky ways to achieve Cross-Domain resource request, most commonly using ways are:
- Use Flash/Silverlight or server side as a "proxy" to communicate
with remote. - JSON With Padding (JSONP).
- Embeds remote server in an iframe and communicate through fragment or window.name, refer here.
Those tricky ways have more or less some issues, for example JSONP might result in security hole if developers simply "eval" it, and #3 above, although it works, both domains should build strict contract between each other, it neither flexible nor elegant IMHO:)
W3C had introduced Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) as a standard solution to provide a safe, flexible and a recommended standard way to solve this issue.
The Mechanism
From a high level we can simply deem CORS is a contract between client AJAX call from domain A and a page hosted on domain B, a typical Cross-Origin request/response would be:
DomainA AJAX request headers
Host DomainB.com
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0
Accept text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8,application/json
Accept-Language en-us;
Accept-Encoding gzip, deflate
Keep-Alive 115
Origin http://DomainA.com
DomainB response headers
Cache-Control private
Content-Type application/json; charset=utf-8
Access-Control-Allow-Origin DomainA.com
Content-Length 87
Proxy-Connection Keep-Alive
Connection Keep-Alive
The blue parts I marked above were the kernal facts, "Origin" request header "indicates where the cross-origin request or preflight request originates from", the "Access-Control-Allow-Origin" response header indicates this page allows remote request from DomainA (if the value is * indicate allows remote requests from any domain).
As I mentioned above, W3 recommended browser to implement a "preflight request" before submiting the actually Cross-Origin HTTP request, in a nutshell it is an HTTP OPTIONS request:
OPTIONS DomainB.com/foo.aspx HTTP/1.1
If foo.aspx supports OPTIONS HTTP verb, it might return response like below:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2011 15:38:19 GMT
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://DomainA.com
Access-Control-Allow-Methods: POST, GET, OPTIONS, HEAD
Access-Control-Allow-Headers: X-Requested-With
Access-Control-Max-Age: 1728000
Connection: Keep-Alive
Content-Type: application/json
Only if the response contains "Access-Control-Allow-Origin" AND its value is "*" or contain the domain who submitted the CORS request, by satisfying this mandtory condition browser will submit the actual Cross-Domain request, and cache the result in "Preflight-Result-Cache".
I blogged about CORS three years ago: AJAX Cross-Origin HTTP request
edited Jul 28 '16 at 9:01
Sujania
3,07563157
3,07563157
answered Jan 23 '14 at 13:54
Wayne YeWayne Ye
1,44221526
1,44221526
This answer made me realize why i was suddenly getting an issue without using this header for POST and GET requests. I had accidently opened the index.html file directly from disk, so the URL the client was accessing on node.js was thought to be cross-domain, while it was simply running on localhost. Accessing via the URL (as one would usually do) "solved" my issue...
– LuqJensen
Jan 8 '17 at 21:06
Would a domain in an external network able to communite with a domain on an internal network?
– Si8
Mar 31 '17 at 1:47
add a comment |
This answer made me realize why i was suddenly getting an issue without using this header for POST and GET requests. I had accidently opened the index.html file directly from disk, so the URL the client was accessing on node.js was thought to be cross-domain, while it was simply running on localhost. Accessing via the URL (as one would usually do) "solved" my issue...
– LuqJensen
Jan 8 '17 at 21:06
Would a domain in an external network able to communite with a domain on an internal network?
– Si8
Mar 31 '17 at 1:47
This answer made me realize why i was suddenly getting an issue without using this header for POST and GET requests. I had accidently opened the index.html file directly from disk, so the URL the client was accessing on node.js was thought to be cross-domain, while it was simply running on localhost. Accessing via the URL (as one would usually do) "solved" my issue...
– LuqJensen
Jan 8 '17 at 21:06
This answer made me realize why i was suddenly getting an issue without using this header for POST and GET requests. I had accidently opened the index.html file directly from disk, so the URL the client was accessing on node.js was thought to be cross-domain, while it was simply running on localhost. Accessing via the URL (as one would usually do) "solved" my issue...
– LuqJensen
Jan 8 '17 at 21:06
Would a domain in an external network able to communite with a domain on an internal network?
– Si8
Mar 31 '17 at 1:47
Would a domain in an external network able to communite with a domain on an internal network?
– Si8
Mar 31 '17 at 1:47
add a comment |
Question is a bit too old to answer, but I am posting this for any future reference to this question.
According to this Mozilla Developer Network article,
A resource makes a cross-origin HTTP request when it requests a resource from a different domain, or port than the one which the first resource itself serves.

An HTML page served from http://domain-a.com makes an <img> src request for http://domain-b.com/image.jpg.
Many pages on the web today load resources like CSS stylesheets, images and scripts from separate domains (thus it should be cool).
Same-Origin Policy
For security reasons, browsers restrict cross-origin HTTP requests initiated from within scripts.
For example, XMLHttpRequest and Fetch follow the same-origin policy.
So, a web application using XMLHttpRequest or Fetch could only make HTTP requests to its own domain.
Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS)
To improve web applications, developers asked browser vendors to allow cross-domain requests.
The Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) mechanism gives web servers cross-domain access controls, which enable secure cross-domain data transfers.
Modern browsers use CORS in an API container - such as XMLHttpRequest or Fetch - to mitigate risks of cross-origin HTTP requests.
How CORS works (Access-Control-Allow-Origin header)
Wikipedia:
The CORS standard describes new HTTP headers which provide browsers and servers a way to request remote URLs only when they have permission.
Although some validation and authorization can be performed by the server, it is generally the browser's responsibility to support these headers and honor the restrictions they impose.
Example
The browser sends the
OPTIONSrequest with anOrigin HTTPheader.
The value of this header is the domain that served the parent page. When a page from
http://www.example.comattempts to access a user's data inservice.example.com, the following request header would be sent toservice.example.com:
Origin: http://www.example.com
The server at
service.example.commay respond with:
An
Access-Control-Allow-Origin(ACAO) header in its response indicating which origin sites are allowed.
For example:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://www.example.com
An error page if the server does not allow the cross-origin request
An
Access-Control-Allow-Origin(ACAO) header with a wildcard that allows all domains:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *
How to set none are allowed to acees some thing likeAccess-Control-Allow-Origin:null
– Subin C Poonamgode
Aug 25 '17 at 6:18
When I don't want to allow anyone to access my resources through CORS, what value should I set forAccess-Control-Allow-Origin? I mean the negation ofAccess-Control-Allow-Origin: *
– Subin C Poonamgode
Aug 31 '17 at 13:54
Just dont set anything, for that purpose
– Trix
Aug 31 '17 at 13:56
add a comment |
Question is a bit too old to answer, but I am posting this for any future reference to this question.
According to this Mozilla Developer Network article,
A resource makes a cross-origin HTTP request when it requests a resource from a different domain, or port than the one which the first resource itself serves.

An HTML page served from http://domain-a.com makes an <img> src request for http://domain-b.com/image.jpg.
Many pages on the web today load resources like CSS stylesheets, images and scripts from separate domains (thus it should be cool).
Same-Origin Policy
For security reasons, browsers restrict cross-origin HTTP requests initiated from within scripts.
For example, XMLHttpRequest and Fetch follow the same-origin policy.
So, a web application using XMLHttpRequest or Fetch could only make HTTP requests to its own domain.
Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS)
To improve web applications, developers asked browser vendors to allow cross-domain requests.
The Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) mechanism gives web servers cross-domain access controls, which enable secure cross-domain data transfers.
Modern browsers use CORS in an API container - such as XMLHttpRequest or Fetch - to mitigate risks of cross-origin HTTP requests.
How CORS works (Access-Control-Allow-Origin header)
Wikipedia:
The CORS standard describes new HTTP headers which provide browsers and servers a way to request remote URLs only when they have permission.
Although some validation and authorization can be performed by the server, it is generally the browser's responsibility to support these headers and honor the restrictions they impose.
Example
The browser sends the
OPTIONSrequest with anOrigin HTTPheader.
The value of this header is the domain that served the parent page. When a page from
http://www.example.comattempts to access a user's data inservice.example.com, the following request header would be sent toservice.example.com:
Origin: http://www.example.com
The server at
service.example.commay respond with:
An
Access-Control-Allow-Origin(ACAO) header in its response indicating which origin sites are allowed.
For example:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://www.example.com
An error page if the server does not allow the cross-origin request
An
Access-Control-Allow-Origin(ACAO) header with a wildcard that allows all domains:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *
How to set none are allowed to acees some thing likeAccess-Control-Allow-Origin:null
– Subin C Poonamgode
Aug 25 '17 at 6:18
When I don't want to allow anyone to access my resources through CORS, what value should I set forAccess-Control-Allow-Origin? I mean the negation ofAccess-Control-Allow-Origin: *
– Subin C Poonamgode
Aug 31 '17 at 13:54
Just dont set anything, for that purpose
– Trix
Aug 31 '17 at 13:56
add a comment |
Question is a bit too old to answer, but I am posting this for any future reference to this question.
According to this Mozilla Developer Network article,
A resource makes a cross-origin HTTP request when it requests a resource from a different domain, or port than the one which the first resource itself serves.

An HTML page served from http://domain-a.com makes an <img> src request for http://domain-b.com/image.jpg.
Many pages on the web today load resources like CSS stylesheets, images and scripts from separate domains (thus it should be cool).
Same-Origin Policy
For security reasons, browsers restrict cross-origin HTTP requests initiated from within scripts.
For example, XMLHttpRequest and Fetch follow the same-origin policy.
So, a web application using XMLHttpRequest or Fetch could only make HTTP requests to its own domain.
Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS)
To improve web applications, developers asked browser vendors to allow cross-domain requests.
The Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) mechanism gives web servers cross-domain access controls, which enable secure cross-domain data transfers.
Modern browsers use CORS in an API container - such as XMLHttpRequest or Fetch - to mitigate risks of cross-origin HTTP requests.
How CORS works (Access-Control-Allow-Origin header)
Wikipedia:
The CORS standard describes new HTTP headers which provide browsers and servers a way to request remote URLs only when they have permission.
Although some validation and authorization can be performed by the server, it is generally the browser's responsibility to support these headers and honor the restrictions they impose.
Example
The browser sends the
OPTIONSrequest with anOrigin HTTPheader.
The value of this header is the domain that served the parent page. When a page from
http://www.example.comattempts to access a user's data inservice.example.com, the following request header would be sent toservice.example.com:
Origin: http://www.example.com
The server at
service.example.commay respond with:
An
Access-Control-Allow-Origin(ACAO) header in its response indicating which origin sites are allowed.
For example:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://www.example.com
An error page if the server does not allow the cross-origin request
An
Access-Control-Allow-Origin(ACAO) header with a wildcard that allows all domains:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *
Question is a bit too old to answer, but I am posting this for any future reference to this question.
According to this Mozilla Developer Network article,
A resource makes a cross-origin HTTP request when it requests a resource from a different domain, or port than the one which the first resource itself serves.

An HTML page served from http://domain-a.com makes an <img> src request for http://domain-b.com/image.jpg.
Many pages on the web today load resources like CSS stylesheets, images and scripts from separate domains (thus it should be cool).
Same-Origin Policy
For security reasons, browsers restrict cross-origin HTTP requests initiated from within scripts.
For example, XMLHttpRequest and Fetch follow the same-origin policy.
So, a web application using XMLHttpRequest or Fetch could only make HTTP requests to its own domain.
Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS)
To improve web applications, developers asked browser vendors to allow cross-domain requests.
The Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) mechanism gives web servers cross-domain access controls, which enable secure cross-domain data transfers.
Modern browsers use CORS in an API container - such as XMLHttpRequest or Fetch - to mitigate risks of cross-origin HTTP requests.
How CORS works (Access-Control-Allow-Origin header)
Wikipedia:
The CORS standard describes new HTTP headers which provide browsers and servers a way to request remote URLs only when they have permission.
Although some validation and authorization can be performed by the server, it is generally the browser's responsibility to support these headers and honor the restrictions they impose.
Example
The browser sends the
OPTIONSrequest with anOrigin HTTPheader.
The value of this header is the domain that served the parent page. When a page from
http://www.example.comattempts to access a user's data inservice.example.com, the following request header would be sent toservice.example.com:
Origin: http://www.example.com
The server at
service.example.commay respond with:
An
Access-Control-Allow-Origin(ACAO) header in its response indicating which origin sites are allowed.
For example:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://www.example.com
An error page if the server does not allow the cross-origin request
An
Access-Control-Allow-Origin(ACAO) header with a wildcard that allows all domains:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *
answered Mar 5 '17 at 6:39
TrixTrix
10k85174
10k85174
How to set none are allowed to acees some thing likeAccess-Control-Allow-Origin:null
– Subin C Poonamgode
Aug 25 '17 at 6:18
When I don't want to allow anyone to access my resources through CORS, what value should I set forAccess-Control-Allow-Origin? I mean the negation ofAccess-Control-Allow-Origin: *
– Subin C Poonamgode
Aug 31 '17 at 13:54
Just dont set anything, for that purpose
– Trix
Aug 31 '17 at 13:56
add a comment |
How to set none are allowed to acees some thing likeAccess-Control-Allow-Origin:null
– Subin C Poonamgode
Aug 25 '17 at 6:18
When I don't want to allow anyone to access my resources through CORS, what value should I set forAccess-Control-Allow-Origin? I mean the negation ofAccess-Control-Allow-Origin: *
– Subin C Poonamgode
Aug 31 '17 at 13:54
Just dont set anything, for that purpose
– Trix
Aug 31 '17 at 13:56
How to set none are allowed to acees some thing like
Access-Control-Allow-Origin:null– Subin C Poonamgode
Aug 25 '17 at 6:18
How to set none are allowed to acees some thing like
Access-Control-Allow-Origin:null– Subin C Poonamgode
Aug 25 '17 at 6:18
When I don't want to allow anyone to access my resources through CORS, what value should I set for
Access-Control-Allow-Origin ? I mean the negation of Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *– Subin C Poonamgode
Aug 31 '17 at 13:54
When I don't want to allow anyone to access my resources through CORS, what value should I set for
Access-Control-Allow-Origin ? I mean the negation of Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *– Subin C Poonamgode
Aug 31 '17 at 13:54
Just dont set anything, for that purpose
– Trix
Aug 31 '17 at 13:56
Just dont set anything, for that purpose
– Trix
Aug 31 '17 at 13:56
add a comment |
If you want just to test a cross domain application in which the browser blocks your request, then you can just open your browser in unsafe mode and test your application without changing your code and without making your code unsafe.
From MAC OS you can do this from the terminal line:
open -a Google Chrome --args --disable-web-security --user-data-dir
add a comment |
If you want just to test a cross domain application in which the browser blocks your request, then you can just open your browser in unsafe mode and test your application without changing your code and without making your code unsafe.
From MAC OS you can do this from the terminal line:
open -a Google Chrome --args --disable-web-security --user-data-dir
add a comment |
If you want just to test a cross domain application in which the browser blocks your request, then you can just open your browser in unsafe mode and test your application without changing your code and without making your code unsafe.
From MAC OS you can do this from the terminal line:
open -a Google Chrome --args --disable-web-security --user-data-dir
If you want just to test a cross domain application in which the browser blocks your request, then you can just open your browser in unsafe mode and test your application without changing your code and without making your code unsafe.
From MAC OS you can do this from the terminal line:
open -a Google Chrome --args --disable-web-security --user-data-dir
answered Feb 22 '17 at 16:32
Maurizio BrioschiMaurizio Brioschi
355612
355612
add a comment |
add a comment |
Using React and Axios, join proxy link to the URL and add header as shown below
https://cors-anywhere.herokuapp.com/ + Your API URL
Just by adding the Proxy link will work, but it can also throw error for No Access again. Hence better to add header as shown below.
axios.get(`https://cors-anywhere.herokuapp.com/[YOUR_API_URL]`,{headers: {'Access-Control-Allow-Origin': '*'}})
.then(response => console.log(response:data);
}
2
Please don't do this. Using a proxy link is like handing over user cookies to a middle-man. Should be illegal IMHO
– captainserious
Dec 9 '17 at 10:12
Thanks for sharing this! You saved my day. You think I can use this hack on production?
– blvckasvp
Oct 19 '18 at 1:18
add a comment |
Using React and Axios, join proxy link to the URL and add header as shown below
https://cors-anywhere.herokuapp.com/ + Your API URL
Just by adding the Proxy link will work, but it can also throw error for No Access again. Hence better to add header as shown below.
axios.get(`https://cors-anywhere.herokuapp.com/[YOUR_API_URL]`,{headers: {'Access-Control-Allow-Origin': '*'}})
.then(response => console.log(response:data);
}
2
Please don't do this. Using a proxy link is like handing over user cookies to a middle-man. Should be illegal IMHO
– captainserious
Dec 9 '17 at 10:12
Thanks for sharing this! You saved my day. You think I can use this hack on production?
– blvckasvp
Oct 19 '18 at 1:18
add a comment |
Using React and Axios, join proxy link to the URL and add header as shown below
https://cors-anywhere.herokuapp.com/ + Your API URL
Just by adding the Proxy link will work, but it can also throw error for No Access again. Hence better to add header as shown below.
axios.get(`https://cors-anywhere.herokuapp.com/[YOUR_API_URL]`,{headers: {'Access-Control-Allow-Origin': '*'}})
.then(response => console.log(response:data);
}
Using React and Axios, join proxy link to the URL and add header as shown below
https://cors-anywhere.herokuapp.com/ + Your API URL
Just by adding the Proxy link will work, but it can also throw error for No Access again. Hence better to add header as shown below.
axios.get(`https://cors-anywhere.herokuapp.com/[YOUR_API_URL]`,{headers: {'Access-Control-Allow-Origin': '*'}})
.then(response => console.log(response:data);
}
answered Oct 16 '17 at 15:53
Dhaval JardoshDhaval Jardosh
3,65921035
3,65921035
2
Please don't do this. Using a proxy link is like handing over user cookies to a middle-man. Should be illegal IMHO
– captainserious
Dec 9 '17 at 10:12
Thanks for sharing this! You saved my day. You think I can use this hack on production?
– blvckasvp
Oct 19 '18 at 1:18
add a comment |
2
Please don't do this. Using a proxy link is like handing over user cookies to a middle-man. Should be illegal IMHO
– captainserious
Dec 9 '17 at 10:12
Thanks for sharing this! You saved my day. You think I can use this hack on production?
– blvckasvp
Oct 19 '18 at 1:18
2
2
Please don't do this. Using a proxy link is like handing over user cookies to a middle-man. Should be illegal IMHO
– captainserious
Dec 9 '17 at 10:12
Please don't do this. Using a proxy link is like handing over user cookies to a middle-man. Should be illegal IMHO
– captainserious
Dec 9 '17 at 10:12
Thanks for sharing this! You saved my day. You think I can use this hack on production?
– blvckasvp
Oct 19 '18 at 1:18
Thanks for sharing this! You saved my day. You think I can use this hack on production?
– blvckasvp
Oct 19 '18 at 1:18
add a comment |
Whenever I start thinking about CORS, my intuition about which site hosts the headers is incorrect, just as you described in your question. For me, it helps to think about the purpose of the same origin policy.
The purpose of the same origin policy is to protect you from malicious JavaScript on siteA.com accessing private information you've chosen to share only with siteB.com. Without the same origin policy, JavaScript written by the authors of siteA.com could make your browser make requests to siteB.com, using your authentication cookies for siteB.com. In this way, siteA.com could steal the secret information you share with siteB.com.
Sometimes you need to work cross domain, which is where CORS comes in. CORS relaxes the same origin policy for domainA.com, using the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header to list other domains (domainB.com) that are trusted to run JavaScript that can interact with domainA.com.
To understand which domain should serve the CORS headers, consider this. You visit malicious.com, which contains some JavaScript that tries to make a cross domain request to mybank.com. It should be up to mybank.com, not malicious.com, to decide whether or not it sets CORS headers that relax the same origin policy allowing the JavaScript from malicious.com to interact with it. If malicous.com could set its own CORS headers allowing its own JavaScript access to mybank.com, this would completely nullify the same origin policy.
I think the reason for my bad intuition is the point of view I have when developing a site. It's my site, with all my JavaScript, therefore it isn't doing anything malicious and it should be up to me to specify which other sites my JavaScript can interact with. When in fact I should be thinking which other sites JavaScript are trying to interact with my site and should I use CORS to allow them?
add a comment |
Whenever I start thinking about CORS, my intuition about which site hosts the headers is incorrect, just as you described in your question. For me, it helps to think about the purpose of the same origin policy.
The purpose of the same origin policy is to protect you from malicious JavaScript on siteA.com accessing private information you've chosen to share only with siteB.com. Without the same origin policy, JavaScript written by the authors of siteA.com could make your browser make requests to siteB.com, using your authentication cookies for siteB.com. In this way, siteA.com could steal the secret information you share with siteB.com.
Sometimes you need to work cross domain, which is where CORS comes in. CORS relaxes the same origin policy for domainA.com, using the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header to list other domains (domainB.com) that are trusted to run JavaScript that can interact with domainA.com.
To understand which domain should serve the CORS headers, consider this. You visit malicious.com, which contains some JavaScript that tries to make a cross domain request to mybank.com. It should be up to mybank.com, not malicious.com, to decide whether or not it sets CORS headers that relax the same origin policy allowing the JavaScript from malicious.com to interact with it. If malicous.com could set its own CORS headers allowing its own JavaScript access to mybank.com, this would completely nullify the same origin policy.
I think the reason for my bad intuition is the point of view I have when developing a site. It's my site, with all my JavaScript, therefore it isn't doing anything malicious and it should be up to me to specify which other sites my JavaScript can interact with. When in fact I should be thinking which other sites JavaScript are trying to interact with my site and should I use CORS to allow them?
add a comment |
Whenever I start thinking about CORS, my intuition about which site hosts the headers is incorrect, just as you described in your question. For me, it helps to think about the purpose of the same origin policy.
The purpose of the same origin policy is to protect you from malicious JavaScript on siteA.com accessing private information you've chosen to share only with siteB.com. Without the same origin policy, JavaScript written by the authors of siteA.com could make your browser make requests to siteB.com, using your authentication cookies for siteB.com. In this way, siteA.com could steal the secret information you share with siteB.com.
Sometimes you need to work cross domain, which is where CORS comes in. CORS relaxes the same origin policy for domainA.com, using the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header to list other domains (domainB.com) that are trusted to run JavaScript that can interact with domainA.com.
To understand which domain should serve the CORS headers, consider this. You visit malicious.com, which contains some JavaScript that tries to make a cross domain request to mybank.com. It should be up to mybank.com, not malicious.com, to decide whether or not it sets CORS headers that relax the same origin policy allowing the JavaScript from malicious.com to interact with it. If malicous.com could set its own CORS headers allowing its own JavaScript access to mybank.com, this would completely nullify the same origin policy.
I think the reason for my bad intuition is the point of view I have when developing a site. It's my site, with all my JavaScript, therefore it isn't doing anything malicious and it should be up to me to specify which other sites my JavaScript can interact with. When in fact I should be thinking which other sites JavaScript are trying to interact with my site and should I use CORS to allow them?
Whenever I start thinking about CORS, my intuition about which site hosts the headers is incorrect, just as you described in your question. For me, it helps to think about the purpose of the same origin policy.
The purpose of the same origin policy is to protect you from malicious JavaScript on siteA.com accessing private information you've chosen to share only with siteB.com. Without the same origin policy, JavaScript written by the authors of siteA.com could make your browser make requests to siteB.com, using your authentication cookies for siteB.com. In this way, siteA.com could steal the secret information you share with siteB.com.
Sometimes you need to work cross domain, which is where CORS comes in. CORS relaxes the same origin policy for domainA.com, using the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header to list other domains (domainB.com) that are trusted to run JavaScript that can interact with domainA.com.
To understand which domain should serve the CORS headers, consider this. You visit malicious.com, which contains some JavaScript that tries to make a cross domain request to mybank.com. It should be up to mybank.com, not malicious.com, to decide whether or not it sets CORS headers that relax the same origin policy allowing the JavaScript from malicious.com to interact with it. If malicous.com could set its own CORS headers allowing its own JavaScript access to mybank.com, this would completely nullify the same origin policy.
I think the reason for my bad intuition is the point of view I have when developing a site. It's my site, with all my JavaScript, therefore it isn't doing anything malicious and it should be up to me to specify which other sites my JavaScript can interact with. When in fact I should be thinking which other sites JavaScript are trying to interact with my site and should I use CORS to allow them?
edited Nov 26 '18 at 6:26
Eureka
647311
647311
answered Jan 28 '18 at 18:47
DomDom
1,29221426
1,29221426
add a comment |
add a comment |
1. A client downloads javascript code MyCode.js from http://siteA - the origin.
The code that does the downloading - your html script tag or xhr from javascript or whatever - came from, let's say, http://siteZ. And, when the browser requests MyCode.js, it sends an Origin: header saying "Origin: http://siteZ", because it can see that you're requesting to siteA and siteZ != siteA. (You cannot stop or interfere with this.)
2. The response header of MyCode.js contains Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteB, which I thought meant that MyCode.js was allowed to make cross-origin references to the site B.
no. It means, Only siteB is allowed to do this request. So your request for MyCode.js from siteZ gets an error instead, and the browser typically gives you nothing. But if you make your server return A-C-A-O: siteZ instead, you'll get MyCode.js . Or if it sends '*', that'll work, that'll let everybody in. Or if the server always sends the string from the Origin: header... but... for security, if you're afraid of hackers, your server should only allow origins on a shortlist, that are allowed to make those requests.
Then, MyCode.js comes from siteA. When it makes requests to siteB, they are all cross-origin, the browser sends Origin: siteA, and siteB has to take the siteA, recognize it's on the short list of allowed requesters, and send back A-C-A-O: siteA. Only then will the browser let your script get the result of those requests.
add a comment |
1. A client downloads javascript code MyCode.js from http://siteA - the origin.
The code that does the downloading - your html script tag or xhr from javascript or whatever - came from, let's say, http://siteZ. And, when the browser requests MyCode.js, it sends an Origin: header saying "Origin: http://siteZ", because it can see that you're requesting to siteA and siteZ != siteA. (You cannot stop or interfere with this.)
2. The response header of MyCode.js contains Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteB, which I thought meant that MyCode.js was allowed to make cross-origin references to the site B.
no. It means, Only siteB is allowed to do this request. So your request for MyCode.js from siteZ gets an error instead, and the browser typically gives you nothing. But if you make your server return A-C-A-O: siteZ instead, you'll get MyCode.js . Or if it sends '*', that'll work, that'll let everybody in. Or if the server always sends the string from the Origin: header... but... for security, if you're afraid of hackers, your server should only allow origins on a shortlist, that are allowed to make those requests.
Then, MyCode.js comes from siteA. When it makes requests to siteB, they are all cross-origin, the browser sends Origin: siteA, and siteB has to take the siteA, recognize it's on the short list of allowed requesters, and send back A-C-A-O: siteA. Only then will the browser let your script get the result of those requests.
add a comment |
1. A client downloads javascript code MyCode.js from http://siteA - the origin.
The code that does the downloading - your html script tag or xhr from javascript or whatever - came from, let's say, http://siteZ. And, when the browser requests MyCode.js, it sends an Origin: header saying "Origin: http://siteZ", because it can see that you're requesting to siteA and siteZ != siteA. (You cannot stop or interfere with this.)
2. The response header of MyCode.js contains Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteB, which I thought meant that MyCode.js was allowed to make cross-origin references to the site B.
no. It means, Only siteB is allowed to do this request. So your request for MyCode.js from siteZ gets an error instead, and the browser typically gives you nothing. But if you make your server return A-C-A-O: siteZ instead, you'll get MyCode.js . Or if it sends '*', that'll work, that'll let everybody in. Or if the server always sends the string from the Origin: header... but... for security, if you're afraid of hackers, your server should only allow origins on a shortlist, that are allowed to make those requests.
Then, MyCode.js comes from siteA. When it makes requests to siteB, they are all cross-origin, the browser sends Origin: siteA, and siteB has to take the siteA, recognize it's on the short list of allowed requesters, and send back A-C-A-O: siteA. Only then will the browser let your script get the result of those requests.
1. A client downloads javascript code MyCode.js from http://siteA - the origin.
The code that does the downloading - your html script tag or xhr from javascript or whatever - came from, let's say, http://siteZ. And, when the browser requests MyCode.js, it sends an Origin: header saying "Origin: http://siteZ", because it can see that you're requesting to siteA and siteZ != siteA. (You cannot stop or interfere with this.)
2. The response header of MyCode.js contains Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteB, which I thought meant that MyCode.js was allowed to make cross-origin references to the site B.
no. It means, Only siteB is allowed to do this request. So your request for MyCode.js from siteZ gets an error instead, and the browser typically gives you nothing. But if you make your server return A-C-A-O: siteZ instead, you'll get MyCode.js . Or if it sends '*', that'll work, that'll let everybody in. Or if the server always sends the string from the Origin: header... but... for security, if you're afraid of hackers, your server should only allow origins on a shortlist, that are allowed to make those requests.
Then, MyCode.js comes from siteA. When it makes requests to siteB, they are all cross-origin, the browser sends Origin: siteA, and siteB has to take the siteA, recognize it's on the short list of allowed requesters, and send back A-C-A-O: siteA. Only then will the browser let your script get the result of those requests.
answered Feb 27 '16 at 1:37
OsamaBinLoginOsamaBinLogin
15317
15317
add a comment |
add a comment |
i work with express 4 and node 7.4 and angular,I had the same problem me help this:
a) server side: in file app.js i give headers to all response like:
app.use(function(req, res, next) {
res.header('Access-Control-Allow-Origin', req.headers.origin);
res.header("Access-Control-Allow-Headers", "Origin, X-Requested-With, Content-Type, Accept");
next();
});
this must have before all router.
I saw a lot of added this headers:
res.header("Access-Control-Allow-Headers","*");
res.header('Access-Control-Allow-Credentials', true);
res.header('Access-Control-Allow-Methods', 'GET,PUT,POST,DELETE');
but i dont need that,
b) client side: in send ajax you need add: "withCredentials: true," like:
$http({
method: 'POST',
url: 'url,
withCredentials: true,
data : {}
}).then(function(response){
// code
}, function (response) {
// code
});
good luck.
add a comment |
i work with express 4 and node 7.4 and angular,I had the same problem me help this:
a) server side: in file app.js i give headers to all response like:
app.use(function(req, res, next) {
res.header('Access-Control-Allow-Origin', req.headers.origin);
res.header("Access-Control-Allow-Headers", "Origin, X-Requested-With, Content-Type, Accept");
next();
});
this must have before all router.
I saw a lot of added this headers:
res.header("Access-Control-Allow-Headers","*");
res.header('Access-Control-Allow-Credentials', true);
res.header('Access-Control-Allow-Methods', 'GET,PUT,POST,DELETE');
but i dont need that,
b) client side: in send ajax you need add: "withCredentials: true," like:
$http({
method: 'POST',
url: 'url,
withCredentials: true,
data : {}
}).then(function(response){
// code
}, function (response) {
// code
});
good luck.
add a comment |
i work with express 4 and node 7.4 and angular,I had the same problem me help this:
a) server side: in file app.js i give headers to all response like:
app.use(function(req, res, next) {
res.header('Access-Control-Allow-Origin', req.headers.origin);
res.header("Access-Control-Allow-Headers", "Origin, X-Requested-With, Content-Type, Accept");
next();
});
this must have before all router.
I saw a lot of added this headers:
res.header("Access-Control-Allow-Headers","*");
res.header('Access-Control-Allow-Credentials', true);
res.header('Access-Control-Allow-Methods', 'GET,PUT,POST,DELETE');
but i dont need that,
b) client side: in send ajax you need add: "withCredentials: true," like:
$http({
method: 'POST',
url: 'url,
withCredentials: true,
data : {}
}).then(function(response){
// code
}, function (response) {
// code
});
good luck.
i work with express 4 and node 7.4 and angular,I had the same problem me help this:
a) server side: in file app.js i give headers to all response like:
app.use(function(req, res, next) {
res.header('Access-Control-Allow-Origin', req.headers.origin);
res.header("Access-Control-Allow-Headers", "Origin, X-Requested-With, Content-Type, Accept");
next();
});
this must have before all router.
I saw a lot of added this headers:
res.header("Access-Control-Allow-Headers","*");
res.header('Access-Control-Allow-Credentials', true);
res.header('Access-Control-Allow-Methods', 'GET,PUT,POST,DELETE');
but i dont need that,
b) client side: in send ajax you need add: "withCredentials: true," like:
$http({
method: 'POST',
url: 'url,
withCredentials: true,
data : {}
}).then(function(response){
// code
}, function (response) {
// code
});
good luck.
answered Feb 6 '17 at 8:19
izik fizik f
79596
79596
add a comment |
add a comment |
If you are using PHP, try to add the following code at the beaning of the php file:
if you are using localhost, try this:
header("Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *");
if you are using external domains such as server, try this:
header("Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://www.website.com");
add a comment |
If you are using PHP, try to add the following code at the beaning of the php file:
if you are using localhost, try this:
header("Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *");
if you are using external domains such as server, try this:
header("Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://www.website.com");
add a comment |
If you are using PHP, try to add the following code at the beaning of the php file:
if you are using localhost, try this:
header("Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *");
if you are using external domains such as server, try this:
header("Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://www.website.com");
If you are using PHP, try to add the following code at the beaning of the php file:
if you are using localhost, try this:
header("Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *");
if you are using external domains such as server, try this:
header("Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://www.website.com");
answered Jan 18 '17 at 15:30
Melvin GuerreroMelvin Guerrero
7516
7516
add a comment |
add a comment |
For cross origin sharing, set header: 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin':'*';
Php: header('Access-Control-Allow-Origin':'*');
Node: app.use('Access-Control-Allow-Origin':'*');
This will allow to share content for different domain.
add a comment |
For cross origin sharing, set header: 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin':'*';
Php: header('Access-Control-Allow-Origin':'*');
Node: app.use('Access-Control-Allow-Origin':'*');
This will allow to share content for different domain.
add a comment |
For cross origin sharing, set header: 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin':'*';
Php: header('Access-Control-Allow-Origin':'*');
Node: app.use('Access-Control-Allow-Origin':'*');
This will allow to share content for different domain.
For cross origin sharing, set header: 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin':'*';
Php: header('Access-Control-Allow-Origin':'*');
Node: app.use('Access-Control-Allow-Origin':'*');
This will allow to share content for different domain.
edited Jan 16 '17 at 8:10
budidino
5,97155866
5,97155866
answered Nov 28 '16 at 2:39
suryadevsuryadev
732
732
add a comment |
add a comment |
In Python I have been using the Flask-CORS library with great success. It makes dealing with CORS super easy and painless. I added some code from the library's documentation below.
Installing:
$ pip install -U flask-cors
Simple example that allows CORS for all domains on all routes:
from flask import Flask
from flask_cors import CORS
app = Flask(__name__)
CORS(app)
@app.route("/")
def helloWorld():
return "Hello, cross-origin-world!"
For more specific examples see the documentation. I have used the simple example above to get around the CORS issue in an ionic application I am building that has to access a separate flask server.
add a comment |
In Python I have been using the Flask-CORS library with great success. It makes dealing with CORS super easy and painless. I added some code from the library's documentation below.
Installing:
$ pip install -U flask-cors
Simple example that allows CORS for all domains on all routes:
from flask import Flask
from flask_cors import CORS
app = Flask(__name__)
CORS(app)
@app.route("/")
def helloWorld():
return "Hello, cross-origin-world!"
For more specific examples see the documentation. I have used the simple example above to get around the CORS issue in an ionic application I am building that has to access a separate flask server.
add a comment |
In Python I have been using the Flask-CORS library with great success. It makes dealing with CORS super easy and painless. I added some code from the library's documentation below.
Installing:
$ pip install -U flask-cors
Simple example that allows CORS for all domains on all routes:
from flask import Flask
from flask_cors import CORS
app = Flask(__name__)
CORS(app)
@app.route("/")
def helloWorld():
return "Hello, cross-origin-world!"
For more specific examples see the documentation. I have used the simple example above to get around the CORS issue in an ionic application I am building that has to access a separate flask server.
In Python I have been using the Flask-CORS library with great success. It makes dealing with CORS super easy and painless. I added some code from the library's documentation below.
Installing:
$ pip install -U flask-cors
Simple example that allows CORS for all domains on all routes:
from flask import Flask
from flask_cors import CORS
app = Flask(__name__)
CORS(app)
@app.route("/")
def helloWorld():
return "Hello, cross-origin-world!"
For more specific examples see the documentation. I have used the simple example above to get around the CORS issue in an ionic application I am building that has to access a separate flask server.
answered Jan 25 '18 at 11:10
agaidisagaidis
694823
694823
add a comment |
add a comment |
Simply paste the following code in your web.config file.
Noted that, you have to paste the following code under <system.webServer> tag
<httpProtocol>
<customHeaders>
<add name="Access-Control-Allow-Origin" value="*" />
<add name="Access-Control-Allow-Headers" value="Content-Type" />
<add name="Access-Control-Allow-Methods" value="GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, OPTIONS" />
</customHeaders>
</httpProtocol>
add a comment |
Simply paste the following code in your web.config file.
Noted that, you have to paste the following code under <system.webServer> tag
<httpProtocol>
<customHeaders>
<add name="Access-Control-Allow-Origin" value="*" />
<add name="Access-Control-Allow-Headers" value="Content-Type" />
<add name="Access-Control-Allow-Methods" value="GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, OPTIONS" />
</customHeaders>
</httpProtocol>
add a comment |
Simply paste the following code in your web.config file.
Noted that, you have to paste the following code under <system.webServer> tag
<httpProtocol>
<customHeaders>
<add name="Access-Control-Allow-Origin" value="*" />
<add name="Access-Control-Allow-Headers" value="Content-Type" />
<add name="Access-Control-Allow-Methods" value="GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, OPTIONS" />
</customHeaders>
</httpProtocol>
Simply paste the following code in your web.config file.
Noted that, you have to paste the following code under <system.webServer> tag
<httpProtocol>
<customHeaders>
<add name="Access-Control-Allow-Origin" value="*" />
<add name="Access-Control-Allow-Headers" value="Content-Type" />
<add name="Access-Control-Allow-Methods" value="GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, OPTIONS" />
</customHeaders>
</httpProtocol>
answered Jan 20 at 4:35
Juboraj SarkerJuboraj Sarker
5041411
5041411
add a comment |
add a comment |
The Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header indicates whether the
response can be shared with requesting code from the given origin.
Header type Response header
Forbidden header name no
A response that tells the browser to allow code from any origin to
access a resource will include the following:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *
For more info, visit here....
add a comment |
The Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header indicates whether the
response can be shared with requesting code from the given origin.
Header type Response header
Forbidden header name no
A response that tells the browser to allow code from any origin to
access a resource will include the following:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *
For more info, visit here....
add a comment |
The Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header indicates whether the
response can be shared with requesting code from the given origin.
Header type Response header
Forbidden header name no
A response that tells the browser to allow code from any origin to
access a resource will include the following:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *
For more info, visit here....
The Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header indicates whether the
response can be shared with requesting code from the given origin.
Header type Response header
Forbidden header name no
A response that tells the browser to allow code from any origin to
access a resource will include the following:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *
For more info, visit here....
answered Jan 31 at 11:49
AlirezaAlireza
49.4k13173122
49.4k13173122
add a comment |
add a comment |
protected by Community♦ May 16 '17 at 19:30
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
2
I'm not sure, but I believe that setting the header this way allows code on site B to fetch
http://siteA/MyCode.js.– pimvdb
May 17 '12 at 13:26
4
But how??? In order to get the header value one has to fetch the resource first, but the resource is cross-origin and so shouldn't the browser block the request in the first place?
– mark
May 17 '12 at 13:33
What you described actually resembles another practice, Content Security Policy
– Alex
Jun 9 '16 at 17:03
2
@mark You don't have to fetch the resource in order to get the headers. The HTTP HEADER method will return headers-only. And in the case of CORS, a preflight check is done using the HTTP OPTIONS method which doesn't return the body either. apsillers answer describes this nicely stackoverflow.com/posts/10636765/revisions.
– Matt
Sep 9 '16 at 23:50