Peculiar errors while converting Range and StrideTo into Sequence
The following function produces compiler errors:
func iterateColumnsAlongGravity<S: Sequence>(using block: (_ indexes: S) -> ())
where S.Element == Int {
switch gravityDirection {
case .bot:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
// 'Range<Int>' is not convertible to 'S'
block(i..<(i + h))
}
case .top:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
// 'ReversedCollection<(Range<Int>)>' is not convertible to 'S'
block((i..<(i + h)).reversed())
}
case .left:
for y in 0..<h {
let indexes = stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h).reversed()
// '([Int]) -> ()' is not convertible to '(S) -> ()'
block(indexes)
}
case .right:
for y in 0..<h {
// '(StrideTo<Int>) -> ()' is not convertible to '(S) -> ()'
let indexes = stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h)
block(indexes)
}
}
}
I don't understand why the compiler doesn't converts Range<Int>
to S
(and other types as well) while Range
is obviously conforms to Sequence
and it's element is Int
.
It's even more peculiar, that if I replace block
with a class method of similar signature, there are no any errors:
func printIntSequence<S: Sequence>(_ s: S) where S.Element == Int {
for i in s {
print(i)
}
}
func typeConversionTest() {
switch gravityDirection {
case .bot:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
printIntSequence(i..<(i + h))
}
case .top:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
printIntSequence((i..<(i + h)).reversed())
}
case .left:
for y in 0..<h {
let indexes = stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h).reversed()
printIntSequence(indexes)
}
case .right:
for y in 0..<h {
let indexes = stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h)
printIntSequence(indexes)
}
}
}
The only difference between iterateColumnsAlongGravity(using:)
and typeConversionTest()
that the first one takes the block as a parameter.
swift generics collections sequence where
add a comment |
The following function produces compiler errors:
func iterateColumnsAlongGravity<S: Sequence>(using block: (_ indexes: S) -> ())
where S.Element == Int {
switch gravityDirection {
case .bot:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
// 'Range<Int>' is not convertible to 'S'
block(i..<(i + h))
}
case .top:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
// 'ReversedCollection<(Range<Int>)>' is not convertible to 'S'
block((i..<(i + h)).reversed())
}
case .left:
for y in 0..<h {
let indexes = stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h).reversed()
// '([Int]) -> ()' is not convertible to '(S) -> ()'
block(indexes)
}
case .right:
for y in 0..<h {
// '(StrideTo<Int>) -> ()' is not convertible to '(S) -> ()'
let indexes = stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h)
block(indexes)
}
}
}
I don't understand why the compiler doesn't converts Range<Int>
to S
(and other types as well) while Range
is obviously conforms to Sequence
and it's element is Int
.
It's even more peculiar, that if I replace block
with a class method of similar signature, there are no any errors:
func printIntSequence<S: Sequence>(_ s: S) where S.Element == Int {
for i in s {
print(i)
}
}
func typeConversionTest() {
switch gravityDirection {
case .bot:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
printIntSequence(i..<(i + h))
}
case .top:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
printIntSequence((i..<(i + h)).reversed())
}
case .left:
for y in 0..<h {
let indexes = stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h).reversed()
printIntSequence(indexes)
}
case .right:
for y in 0..<h {
let indexes = stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h)
printIntSequence(indexes)
}
}
}
The only difference between iterateColumnsAlongGravity(using:)
and typeConversionTest()
that the first one takes the block as a parameter.
swift generics collections sequence where
Cross-posted (and answered) at forums.swift.org/t/….
– Martin R
Nov 23 '18 at 13:38
add a comment |
The following function produces compiler errors:
func iterateColumnsAlongGravity<S: Sequence>(using block: (_ indexes: S) -> ())
where S.Element == Int {
switch gravityDirection {
case .bot:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
// 'Range<Int>' is not convertible to 'S'
block(i..<(i + h))
}
case .top:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
// 'ReversedCollection<(Range<Int>)>' is not convertible to 'S'
block((i..<(i + h)).reversed())
}
case .left:
for y in 0..<h {
let indexes = stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h).reversed()
// '([Int]) -> ()' is not convertible to '(S) -> ()'
block(indexes)
}
case .right:
for y in 0..<h {
// '(StrideTo<Int>) -> ()' is not convertible to '(S) -> ()'
let indexes = stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h)
block(indexes)
}
}
}
I don't understand why the compiler doesn't converts Range<Int>
to S
(and other types as well) while Range
is obviously conforms to Sequence
and it's element is Int
.
It's even more peculiar, that if I replace block
with a class method of similar signature, there are no any errors:
func printIntSequence<S: Sequence>(_ s: S) where S.Element == Int {
for i in s {
print(i)
}
}
func typeConversionTest() {
switch gravityDirection {
case .bot:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
printIntSequence(i..<(i + h))
}
case .top:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
printIntSequence((i..<(i + h)).reversed())
}
case .left:
for y in 0..<h {
let indexes = stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h).reversed()
printIntSequence(indexes)
}
case .right:
for y in 0..<h {
let indexes = stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h)
printIntSequence(indexes)
}
}
}
The only difference between iterateColumnsAlongGravity(using:)
and typeConversionTest()
that the first one takes the block as a parameter.
swift generics collections sequence where
The following function produces compiler errors:
func iterateColumnsAlongGravity<S: Sequence>(using block: (_ indexes: S) -> ())
where S.Element == Int {
switch gravityDirection {
case .bot:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
// 'Range<Int>' is not convertible to 'S'
block(i..<(i + h))
}
case .top:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
// 'ReversedCollection<(Range<Int>)>' is not convertible to 'S'
block((i..<(i + h)).reversed())
}
case .left:
for y in 0..<h {
let indexes = stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h).reversed()
// '([Int]) -> ()' is not convertible to '(S) -> ()'
block(indexes)
}
case .right:
for y in 0..<h {
// '(StrideTo<Int>) -> ()' is not convertible to '(S) -> ()'
let indexes = stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h)
block(indexes)
}
}
}
I don't understand why the compiler doesn't converts Range<Int>
to S
(and other types as well) while Range
is obviously conforms to Sequence
and it's element is Int
.
It's even more peculiar, that if I replace block
with a class method of similar signature, there are no any errors:
func printIntSequence<S: Sequence>(_ s: S) where S.Element == Int {
for i in s {
print(i)
}
}
func typeConversionTest() {
switch gravityDirection {
case .bot:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
printIntSequence(i..<(i + h))
}
case .top:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
printIntSequence((i..<(i + h)).reversed())
}
case .left:
for y in 0..<h {
let indexes = stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h).reversed()
printIntSequence(indexes)
}
case .right:
for y in 0..<h {
let indexes = stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h)
printIntSequence(indexes)
}
}
}
The only difference between iterateColumnsAlongGravity(using:)
and typeConversionTest()
that the first one takes the block as a parameter.
swift generics collections sequence where
swift generics collections sequence where
asked Nov 23 '18 at 13:20
kelinkelin
5,70653771
5,70653771
Cross-posted (and answered) at forums.swift.org/t/….
– Martin R
Nov 23 '18 at 13:38
add a comment |
Cross-posted (and answered) at forums.swift.org/t/….
– Martin R
Nov 23 '18 at 13:38
Cross-posted (and answered) at forums.swift.org/t/….
– Martin R
Nov 23 '18 at 13:38
Cross-posted (and answered) at forums.swift.org/t/….
– Martin R
Nov 23 '18 at 13:38
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
During the discussion on Swift forums the following information was revealed:
- What I trying to implement is called higher rank polymorphism and this big feature isn't added to Swift yet.
Probably the easiest solution is to discard generics and use
StrideTo<Int>
here.
func iterateColumnsAlongGravity(using block: (_ indexes: StrideTo<Int>) -> ()) {
switch gravityDirection {
case .bot:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
block(stride(from: i, to: i + h, by: 1))
}
case .top:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
block(stride(from: i + h - h, to: i - h, by: -1))
}
case .left:
for y in 0..<h {
block(stride(from: (w - 1) * h + y, to: -1, by: -h))
}
case .right:
for y in 0..<h {
block(stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h))
}
}
}
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53447496%2fpeculiar-errors-while-converting-range-and-strideto-into-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
During the discussion on Swift forums the following information was revealed:
- What I trying to implement is called higher rank polymorphism and this big feature isn't added to Swift yet.
Probably the easiest solution is to discard generics and use
StrideTo<Int>
here.
func iterateColumnsAlongGravity(using block: (_ indexes: StrideTo<Int>) -> ()) {
switch gravityDirection {
case .bot:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
block(stride(from: i, to: i + h, by: 1))
}
case .top:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
block(stride(from: i + h - h, to: i - h, by: -1))
}
case .left:
for y in 0..<h {
block(stride(from: (w - 1) * h + y, to: -1, by: -h))
}
case .right:
for y in 0..<h {
block(stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h))
}
}
}
add a comment |
During the discussion on Swift forums the following information was revealed:
- What I trying to implement is called higher rank polymorphism and this big feature isn't added to Swift yet.
Probably the easiest solution is to discard generics and use
StrideTo<Int>
here.
func iterateColumnsAlongGravity(using block: (_ indexes: StrideTo<Int>) -> ()) {
switch gravityDirection {
case .bot:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
block(stride(from: i, to: i + h, by: 1))
}
case .top:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
block(stride(from: i + h - h, to: i - h, by: -1))
}
case .left:
for y in 0..<h {
block(stride(from: (w - 1) * h + y, to: -1, by: -h))
}
case .right:
for y in 0..<h {
block(stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h))
}
}
}
add a comment |
During the discussion on Swift forums the following information was revealed:
- What I trying to implement is called higher rank polymorphism and this big feature isn't added to Swift yet.
Probably the easiest solution is to discard generics and use
StrideTo<Int>
here.
func iterateColumnsAlongGravity(using block: (_ indexes: StrideTo<Int>) -> ()) {
switch gravityDirection {
case .bot:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
block(stride(from: i, to: i + h, by: 1))
}
case .top:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
block(stride(from: i + h - h, to: i - h, by: -1))
}
case .left:
for y in 0..<h {
block(stride(from: (w - 1) * h + y, to: -1, by: -h))
}
case .right:
for y in 0..<h {
block(stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h))
}
}
}
During the discussion on Swift forums the following information was revealed:
- What I trying to implement is called higher rank polymorphism and this big feature isn't added to Swift yet.
Probably the easiest solution is to discard generics and use
StrideTo<Int>
here.
func iterateColumnsAlongGravity(using block: (_ indexes: StrideTo<Int>) -> ()) {
switch gravityDirection {
case .bot:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
block(stride(from: i, to: i + h, by: 1))
}
case .top:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
block(stride(from: i + h - h, to: i - h, by: -1))
}
case .left:
for y in 0..<h {
block(stride(from: (w - 1) * h + y, to: -1, by: -h))
}
case .right:
for y in 0..<h {
block(stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h))
}
}
}
edited Dec 14 '18 at 19:52
answered Dec 5 '18 at 15:50
kelinkelin
5,70653771
5,70653771
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53447496%2fpeculiar-errors-while-converting-range-and-strideto-into-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Cross-posted (and answered) at forums.swift.org/t/….
– Martin R
Nov 23 '18 at 13:38