Peculiar errors while converting Range and StrideTo into Sequence












2















The following function produces compiler errors:



func iterateColumnsAlongGravity<S: Sequence>(using block: (_ indexes: S) -> ())
where S.Element == Int {

switch gravityDirection {
case .bot:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
// 'Range<Int>' is not convertible to 'S'
block(i..<(i + h))
}
case .top:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
// 'ReversedCollection<(Range<Int>)>' is not convertible to 'S'
block((i..<(i + h)).reversed())
}
case .left:
for y in 0..<h {
let indexes = stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h).reversed()
// '([Int]) -> ()' is not convertible to '(S) -> ()'
block(indexes)
}
case .right:
for y in 0..<h {
// '(StrideTo<Int>) -> ()' is not convertible to '(S) -> ()'
let indexes = stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h)
block(indexes)
}
}
}


I don't understand why the compiler doesn't converts Range<Int> to S (and other types as well) while Range is obviously conforms to Sequence and it's element is Int.



It's even more peculiar, that if I replace block with a class method of similar signature, there are no any errors:



func printIntSequence<S: Sequence>(_ s: S) where S.Element == Int {
for i in s {
print(i)
}
}

func typeConversionTest() {
switch gravityDirection {
case .bot:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
printIntSequence(i..<(i + h))
}
case .top:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
printIntSequence((i..<(i + h)).reversed())
}
case .left:
for y in 0..<h {
let indexes = stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h).reversed()
printIntSequence(indexes)
}
case .right:
for y in 0..<h {
let indexes = stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h)
printIntSequence(indexes)
}
}
}


The only difference between iterateColumnsAlongGravity(using:) and typeConversionTest() that the first one takes the block as a parameter.










share|improve this question























  • Cross-posted (and answered) at forums.swift.org/t/….

    – Martin R
    Nov 23 '18 at 13:38
















2















The following function produces compiler errors:



func iterateColumnsAlongGravity<S: Sequence>(using block: (_ indexes: S) -> ())
where S.Element == Int {

switch gravityDirection {
case .bot:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
// 'Range<Int>' is not convertible to 'S'
block(i..<(i + h))
}
case .top:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
// 'ReversedCollection<(Range<Int>)>' is not convertible to 'S'
block((i..<(i + h)).reversed())
}
case .left:
for y in 0..<h {
let indexes = stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h).reversed()
// '([Int]) -> ()' is not convertible to '(S) -> ()'
block(indexes)
}
case .right:
for y in 0..<h {
// '(StrideTo<Int>) -> ()' is not convertible to '(S) -> ()'
let indexes = stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h)
block(indexes)
}
}
}


I don't understand why the compiler doesn't converts Range<Int> to S (and other types as well) while Range is obviously conforms to Sequence and it's element is Int.



It's even more peculiar, that if I replace block with a class method of similar signature, there are no any errors:



func printIntSequence<S: Sequence>(_ s: S) where S.Element == Int {
for i in s {
print(i)
}
}

func typeConversionTest() {
switch gravityDirection {
case .bot:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
printIntSequence(i..<(i + h))
}
case .top:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
printIntSequence((i..<(i + h)).reversed())
}
case .left:
for y in 0..<h {
let indexes = stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h).reversed()
printIntSequence(indexes)
}
case .right:
for y in 0..<h {
let indexes = stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h)
printIntSequence(indexes)
}
}
}


The only difference between iterateColumnsAlongGravity(using:) and typeConversionTest() that the first one takes the block as a parameter.










share|improve this question























  • Cross-posted (and answered) at forums.swift.org/t/….

    – Martin R
    Nov 23 '18 at 13:38














2












2








2








The following function produces compiler errors:



func iterateColumnsAlongGravity<S: Sequence>(using block: (_ indexes: S) -> ())
where S.Element == Int {

switch gravityDirection {
case .bot:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
// 'Range<Int>' is not convertible to 'S'
block(i..<(i + h))
}
case .top:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
// 'ReversedCollection<(Range<Int>)>' is not convertible to 'S'
block((i..<(i + h)).reversed())
}
case .left:
for y in 0..<h {
let indexes = stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h).reversed()
// '([Int]) -> ()' is not convertible to '(S) -> ()'
block(indexes)
}
case .right:
for y in 0..<h {
// '(StrideTo<Int>) -> ()' is not convertible to '(S) -> ()'
let indexes = stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h)
block(indexes)
}
}
}


I don't understand why the compiler doesn't converts Range<Int> to S (and other types as well) while Range is obviously conforms to Sequence and it's element is Int.



It's even more peculiar, that if I replace block with a class method of similar signature, there are no any errors:



func printIntSequence<S: Sequence>(_ s: S) where S.Element == Int {
for i in s {
print(i)
}
}

func typeConversionTest() {
switch gravityDirection {
case .bot:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
printIntSequence(i..<(i + h))
}
case .top:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
printIntSequence((i..<(i + h)).reversed())
}
case .left:
for y in 0..<h {
let indexes = stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h).reversed()
printIntSequence(indexes)
}
case .right:
for y in 0..<h {
let indexes = stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h)
printIntSequence(indexes)
}
}
}


The only difference between iterateColumnsAlongGravity(using:) and typeConversionTest() that the first one takes the block as a parameter.










share|improve this question














The following function produces compiler errors:



func iterateColumnsAlongGravity<S: Sequence>(using block: (_ indexes: S) -> ())
where S.Element == Int {

switch gravityDirection {
case .bot:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
// 'Range<Int>' is not convertible to 'S'
block(i..<(i + h))
}
case .top:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
// 'ReversedCollection<(Range<Int>)>' is not convertible to 'S'
block((i..<(i + h)).reversed())
}
case .left:
for y in 0..<h {
let indexes = stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h).reversed()
// '([Int]) -> ()' is not convertible to '(S) -> ()'
block(indexes)
}
case .right:
for y in 0..<h {
// '(StrideTo<Int>) -> ()' is not convertible to '(S) -> ()'
let indexes = stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h)
block(indexes)
}
}
}


I don't understand why the compiler doesn't converts Range<Int> to S (and other types as well) while Range is obviously conforms to Sequence and it's element is Int.



It's even more peculiar, that if I replace block with a class method of similar signature, there are no any errors:



func printIntSequence<S: Sequence>(_ s: S) where S.Element == Int {
for i in s {
print(i)
}
}

func typeConversionTest() {
switch gravityDirection {
case .bot:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
printIntSequence(i..<(i + h))
}
case .top:
for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
printIntSequence((i..<(i + h)).reversed())
}
case .left:
for y in 0..<h {
let indexes = stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h).reversed()
printIntSequence(indexes)
}
case .right:
for y in 0..<h {
let indexes = stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h)
printIntSequence(indexes)
}
}
}


The only difference between iterateColumnsAlongGravity(using:) and typeConversionTest() that the first one takes the block as a parameter.







swift generics collections sequence where






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 23 '18 at 13:20









kelinkelin

5,70653771




5,70653771













  • Cross-posted (and answered) at forums.swift.org/t/….

    – Martin R
    Nov 23 '18 at 13:38



















  • Cross-posted (and answered) at forums.swift.org/t/….

    – Martin R
    Nov 23 '18 at 13:38

















Cross-posted (and answered) at forums.swift.org/t/….

– Martin R
Nov 23 '18 at 13:38





Cross-posted (and answered) at forums.swift.org/t/….

– Martin R
Nov 23 '18 at 13:38












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














During the discussion on Swift forums the following information was revealed:




  1. What I trying to implement is called higher rank polymorphism and this big feature isn't added to Swift yet.


  2. Probably the easiest solution is to discard generics and use StrideTo<Int> here.



    func iterateColumnsAlongGravity(using block: (_ indexes: StrideTo<Int>) -> ()) {
    switch gravityDirection {
    case .bot:
    for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
    block(stride(from: i, to: i + h, by: 1))
    }
    case .top:
    for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
    block(stride(from: i + h - h, to: i - h, by: -1))
    }
    case .left:
    for y in 0..<h {
    block(stride(from: (w - 1) * h + y, to: -1, by: -h))
    }
    case .right:
    for y in 0..<h {
    block(stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h))
    }
    }
    }







share|improve this answer

























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53447496%2fpeculiar-errors-while-converting-range-and-strideto-into-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    During the discussion on Swift forums the following information was revealed:




    1. What I trying to implement is called higher rank polymorphism and this big feature isn't added to Swift yet.


    2. Probably the easiest solution is to discard generics and use StrideTo<Int> here.



      func iterateColumnsAlongGravity(using block: (_ indexes: StrideTo<Int>) -> ()) {
      switch gravityDirection {
      case .bot:
      for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
      block(stride(from: i, to: i + h, by: 1))
      }
      case .top:
      for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
      block(stride(from: i + h - h, to: i - h, by: -1))
      }
      case .left:
      for y in 0..<h {
      block(stride(from: (w - 1) * h + y, to: -1, by: -h))
      }
      case .right:
      for y in 0..<h {
      block(stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h))
      }
      }
      }







    share|improve this answer






























      0














      During the discussion on Swift forums the following information was revealed:




      1. What I trying to implement is called higher rank polymorphism and this big feature isn't added to Swift yet.


      2. Probably the easiest solution is to discard generics and use StrideTo<Int> here.



        func iterateColumnsAlongGravity(using block: (_ indexes: StrideTo<Int>) -> ()) {
        switch gravityDirection {
        case .bot:
        for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
        block(stride(from: i, to: i + h, by: 1))
        }
        case .top:
        for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
        block(stride(from: i + h - h, to: i - h, by: -1))
        }
        case .left:
        for y in 0..<h {
        block(stride(from: (w - 1) * h + y, to: -1, by: -h))
        }
        case .right:
        for y in 0..<h {
        block(stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h))
        }
        }
        }







      share|improve this answer




























        0












        0








        0







        During the discussion on Swift forums the following information was revealed:




        1. What I trying to implement is called higher rank polymorphism and this big feature isn't added to Swift yet.


        2. Probably the easiest solution is to discard generics and use StrideTo<Int> here.



          func iterateColumnsAlongGravity(using block: (_ indexes: StrideTo<Int>) -> ()) {
          switch gravityDirection {
          case .bot:
          for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
          block(stride(from: i, to: i + h, by: 1))
          }
          case .top:
          for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
          block(stride(from: i + h - h, to: i - h, by: -1))
          }
          case .left:
          for y in 0..<h {
          block(stride(from: (w - 1) * h + y, to: -1, by: -h))
          }
          case .right:
          for y in 0..<h {
          block(stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h))
          }
          }
          }







        share|improve this answer















        During the discussion on Swift forums the following information was revealed:




        1. What I trying to implement is called higher rank polymorphism and this big feature isn't added to Swift yet.


        2. Probably the easiest solution is to discard generics and use StrideTo<Int> here.



          func iterateColumnsAlongGravity(using block: (_ indexes: StrideTo<Int>) -> ()) {
          switch gravityDirection {
          case .bot:
          for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
          block(stride(from: i, to: i + h, by: 1))
          }
          case .top:
          for i in stride(from: 0, to: w * h, by: h) {
          block(stride(from: i + h - h, to: i - h, by: -1))
          }
          case .left:
          for y in 0..<h {
          block(stride(from: (w - 1) * h + y, to: -1, by: -h))
          }
          case .right:
          for y in 0..<h {
          block(stride(from: y, to: w * h, by: h))
          }
          }
          }








        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Dec 14 '18 at 19:52

























        answered Dec 5 '18 at 15:50









        kelinkelin

        5,70653771




        5,70653771
































            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53447496%2fpeculiar-errors-while-converting-range-and-strideto-into-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Costa Masnaga

            Fotorealismo

            Sidney Franklin