issue with stream_select() in PHP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I am using stream_select() but it returns 0 number of descriptors after few seconds and my function while there is still data to be read.
An unusual thing though is that if you set the time out as 0 then I always get the number of descriptors as zero.
$num = stream_select($read, $w, $e, 0);
php timeout
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I am using stream_select() but it returns 0 number of descriptors after few seconds and my function while there is still data to be read.
An unusual thing though is that if you set the time out as 0 then I always get the number of descriptors as zero.
$num = stream_select($read, $w, $e, 0);
php timeout
Did you solve it?
– Mattias Wadman
Aug 4 '12 at 15:47
nope I could not.
– AJ.
Aug 7 '12 at 17:20
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I am using stream_select() but it returns 0 number of descriptors after few seconds and my function while there is still data to be read.
An unusual thing though is that if you set the time out as 0 then I always get the number of descriptors as zero.
$num = stream_select($read, $w, $e, 0);
php timeout
I am using stream_select() but it returns 0 number of descriptors after few seconds and my function while there is still data to be read.
An unusual thing though is that if you set the time out as 0 then I always get the number of descriptors as zero.
$num = stream_select($read, $w, $e, 0);
php timeout
php timeout
edited Aug 3 '12 at 16:13
asked Aug 3 '12 at 16:00
AJ.
1,29493272
1,29493272
Did you solve it?
– Mattias Wadman
Aug 4 '12 at 15:47
nope I could not.
– AJ.
Aug 7 '12 at 17:20
add a comment |
Did you solve it?
– Mattias Wadman
Aug 4 '12 at 15:47
nope I could not.
– AJ.
Aug 7 '12 at 17:20
Did you solve it?
– Mattias Wadman
Aug 4 '12 at 15:47
Did you solve it?
– Mattias Wadman
Aug 4 '12 at 15:47
nope I could not.
– AJ.
Aug 7 '12 at 17:20
nope I could not.
– AJ.
Aug 7 '12 at 17:20
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
Does it return the number 0
or a FALSE
boolean? FALSE
means there was some error but zero could be just because of timeout or nothing interesting has happen with the streams and you should do a new select etc.
I would guess this could happen with a zero timeout as it will check and return immediately. Also if you read the PHP manual about stream-select you will see this warning about using zero timeout:
Using a timeout value of 0 allows you to instantaneously poll the status of the streams, however, it is NOT a good idea to use a 0 timeout value in a loop as it will cause your script to consume too much CPU time.
If this is a TCP stream and you want to check for connection close you should check the return value from fread
etc to determine if the other peer has closed the conneciton. About the read
streams array argument:
The streams listed in the read array will be watched to see if characters become available for reading (more precisely, to see if a read will not block - in particular, a stream resource is also ready on end-of-file, in which case an fread() will return a zero length string).
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
stream_select() must be used in a loop
The stream_select() function basically just polls the stream selectors you provided in the first three arguments, which means it will wait until one of the following events occur:
- some data arrives
- or reaches timeout (set with $tv_sec and $tv_usec) without getting any data.
So recieving 0 as a return value is perfectly normal, it means there was no new data in the current polling cycle.
I'd suggest to put the function in a loop something like this:
$EOF = false;
do {
$tmp = null;
$ready = stream_select($read, $write, $excl, 0, 50000);
if ($ready === false ) {
// something went wrong!!
break;
} elseif ($ready > 0) {
foreach($read as $r) {
$tmp .= stream_get_contents($r);
if (feof($r)) $EOF = true;
}
if (!empty($tmp)) {
//
// DO SOMETHING WITH DATA
//
continue;
}
} else {
// No data in the current cycle
}
} while(!$EOF);
Please note that in this example, the script totally ignores everything aside from the input stream. Also, the third section of the "if" statement is for demonstration only.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
http://www.php.net/stream_select
Due to a limitation in the current Zend Engine it is not possible to
pass a constant modifier like NULL directly as a parameter to a
function which expects this parameter to be passed by reference.
Instead use a temporary variable or an expression with the leftmost
member being a temporary variable:
<?php $e = NULL; stream_select($r, $w, $e, 0); ?>
done that still same issue.
– AJ.
Aug 3 '12 at 16:13
without any additional info, I'd suggest to run the script with strace and check what's the return value of the underlying select syscall
– strkol
Aug 3 '12 at 16:16
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I have a similar issue which is caused by the underlying socket timeout.
Eg. I create some streams
$streams = stream_socket_pair(STREAM_PF_UNIX, STREAM_SOCK_STREAM, STREAM_IPPROTO_IP);
Then fork, and use a block such as the following
stream_set_blocking($pipes[1], 1);
stream_set_blocking($pipes[2], 1);
$pipesToRead = array($pipes[1], $pipes[2]);
while (!feof($pipesToRead[0]) || !feof($pipesToRead[1])) {
$reads = $pipesToRead;
$writes = null;
$excepts = $pipesToRead;
$tSec = null;
stream_select($reads, $writes, $excepts, $tSec);
// while it's generating any kind of output, duplicate it wherever it
// needs to go
foreach ($reads as &$read) {
$chunk = fread($read, 8192);
foreach ($streams as &$stream)
fwrite($stream, $chunk);
}
}
Glossing over what other things might be wrong there, my $tSec
argument to stream_select is ignored, and the "stream" will timeout after 60 seconds of inactivity and produce an EOF.
If I add the following after creating the streams
stream_set_timeout($streams[0], 999);
stream_set_timeout($streams[1], 999);
Then I get the result I desire, even if there's no activity on the underlying stream for longer than 60 seconds.
I feel that this might be a bug, because I don't want that EOF after 60 seconds of inactivity on the underlying stream, and I don't want to plug in some arbitrarily large value to avoid hitting the timeout if my processes are idle for some time.
In addition, even if the 60 second timeout remains, I think it should just timeout on my stream_select()
call and my loop should be able to continue.
Further reading of thetv_sec
argument tostream_select
(php.net/manual/en/function.stream-select.php) shows that when it's "null", the only way for the function to return is for an event to happen on one the streams. If PHP isn't going to hang indefinitely, this means the timeout value needs to be one such event, so I should not be surprised by this behaviour. I will try passing a value intv_sec
to see if it means I can remove the call tostream_set_timeout
...
– Andrew Sharpe
Dec 3 at 1:23
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f11799252%2fissue-with-stream-select-in-php%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
Does it return the number 0
or a FALSE
boolean? FALSE
means there was some error but zero could be just because of timeout or nothing interesting has happen with the streams and you should do a new select etc.
I would guess this could happen with a zero timeout as it will check and return immediately. Also if you read the PHP manual about stream-select you will see this warning about using zero timeout:
Using a timeout value of 0 allows you to instantaneously poll the status of the streams, however, it is NOT a good idea to use a 0 timeout value in a loop as it will cause your script to consume too much CPU time.
If this is a TCP stream and you want to check for connection close you should check the return value from fread
etc to determine if the other peer has closed the conneciton. About the read
streams array argument:
The streams listed in the read array will be watched to see if characters become available for reading (more precisely, to see if a read will not block - in particular, a stream resource is also ready on end-of-file, in which case an fread() will return a zero length string).
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
Does it return the number 0
or a FALSE
boolean? FALSE
means there was some error but zero could be just because of timeout or nothing interesting has happen with the streams and you should do a new select etc.
I would guess this could happen with a zero timeout as it will check and return immediately. Also if you read the PHP manual about stream-select you will see this warning about using zero timeout:
Using a timeout value of 0 allows you to instantaneously poll the status of the streams, however, it is NOT a good idea to use a 0 timeout value in a loop as it will cause your script to consume too much CPU time.
If this is a TCP stream and you want to check for connection close you should check the return value from fread
etc to determine if the other peer has closed the conneciton. About the read
streams array argument:
The streams listed in the read array will be watched to see if characters become available for reading (more precisely, to see if a read will not block - in particular, a stream resource is also ready on end-of-file, in which case an fread() will return a zero length string).
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
Does it return the number 0
or a FALSE
boolean? FALSE
means there was some error but zero could be just because of timeout or nothing interesting has happen with the streams and you should do a new select etc.
I would guess this could happen with a zero timeout as it will check and return immediately. Also if you read the PHP manual about stream-select you will see this warning about using zero timeout:
Using a timeout value of 0 allows you to instantaneously poll the status of the streams, however, it is NOT a good idea to use a 0 timeout value in a loop as it will cause your script to consume too much CPU time.
If this is a TCP stream and you want to check for connection close you should check the return value from fread
etc to determine if the other peer has closed the conneciton. About the read
streams array argument:
The streams listed in the read array will be watched to see if characters become available for reading (more precisely, to see if a read will not block - in particular, a stream resource is also ready on end-of-file, in which case an fread() will return a zero length string).
Does it return the number 0
or a FALSE
boolean? FALSE
means there was some error but zero could be just because of timeout or nothing interesting has happen with the streams and you should do a new select etc.
I would guess this could happen with a zero timeout as it will check and return immediately. Also if you read the PHP manual about stream-select you will see this warning about using zero timeout:
Using a timeout value of 0 allows you to instantaneously poll the status of the streams, however, it is NOT a good idea to use a 0 timeout value in a loop as it will cause your script to consume too much CPU time.
If this is a TCP stream and you want to check for connection close you should check the return value from fread
etc to determine if the other peer has closed the conneciton. About the read
streams array argument:
The streams listed in the read array will be watched to see if characters become available for reading (more precisely, to see if a read will not block - in particular, a stream resource is also ready on end-of-file, in which case an fread() will return a zero length string).
answered Aug 3 '12 at 17:53
Mattias Wadman
8,82423449
8,82423449
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
stream_select() must be used in a loop
The stream_select() function basically just polls the stream selectors you provided in the first three arguments, which means it will wait until one of the following events occur:
- some data arrives
- or reaches timeout (set with $tv_sec and $tv_usec) without getting any data.
So recieving 0 as a return value is perfectly normal, it means there was no new data in the current polling cycle.
I'd suggest to put the function in a loop something like this:
$EOF = false;
do {
$tmp = null;
$ready = stream_select($read, $write, $excl, 0, 50000);
if ($ready === false ) {
// something went wrong!!
break;
} elseif ($ready > 0) {
foreach($read as $r) {
$tmp .= stream_get_contents($r);
if (feof($r)) $EOF = true;
}
if (!empty($tmp)) {
//
// DO SOMETHING WITH DATA
//
continue;
}
} else {
// No data in the current cycle
}
} while(!$EOF);
Please note that in this example, the script totally ignores everything aside from the input stream. Also, the third section of the "if" statement is for demonstration only.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
stream_select() must be used in a loop
The stream_select() function basically just polls the stream selectors you provided in the first three arguments, which means it will wait until one of the following events occur:
- some data arrives
- or reaches timeout (set with $tv_sec and $tv_usec) without getting any data.
So recieving 0 as a return value is perfectly normal, it means there was no new data in the current polling cycle.
I'd suggest to put the function in a loop something like this:
$EOF = false;
do {
$tmp = null;
$ready = stream_select($read, $write, $excl, 0, 50000);
if ($ready === false ) {
// something went wrong!!
break;
} elseif ($ready > 0) {
foreach($read as $r) {
$tmp .= stream_get_contents($r);
if (feof($r)) $EOF = true;
}
if (!empty($tmp)) {
//
// DO SOMETHING WITH DATA
//
continue;
}
} else {
// No data in the current cycle
}
} while(!$EOF);
Please note that in this example, the script totally ignores everything aside from the input stream. Also, the third section of the "if" statement is for demonstration only.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
stream_select() must be used in a loop
The stream_select() function basically just polls the stream selectors you provided in the first three arguments, which means it will wait until one of the following events occur:
- some data arrives
- or reaches timeout (set with $tv_sec and $tv_usec) without getting any data.
So recieving 0 as a return value is perfectly normal, it means there was no new data in the current polling cycle.
I'd suggest to put the function in a loop something like this:
$EOF = false;
do {
$tmp = null;
$ready = stream_select($read, $write, $excl, 0, 50000);
if ($ready === false ) {
// something went wrong!!
break;
} elseif ($ready > 0) {
foreach($read as $r) {
$tmp .= stream_get_contents($r);
if (feof($r)) $EOF = true;
}
if (!empty($tmp)) {
//
// DO SOMETHING WITH DATA
//
continue;
}
} else {
// No data in the current cycle
}
} while(!$EOF);
Please note that in this example, the script totally ignores everything aside from the input stream. Also, the third section of the "if" statement is for demonstration only.
stream_select() must be used in a loop
The stream_select() function basically just polls the stream selectors you provided in the first three arguments, which means it will wait until one of the following events occur:
- some data arrives
- or reaches timeout (set with $tv_sec and $tv_usec) without getting any data.
So recieving 0 as a return value is perfectly normal, it means there was no new data in the current polling cycle.
I'd suggest to put the function in a loop something like this:
$EOF = false;
do {
$tmp = null;
$ready = stream_select($read, $write, $excl, 0, 50000);
if ($ready === false ) {
// something went wrong!!
break;
} elseif ($ready > 0) {
foreach($read as $r) {
$tmp .= stream_get_contents($r);
if (feof($r)) $EOF = true;
}
if (!empty($tmp)) {
//
// DO SOMETHING WITH DATA
//
continue;
}
} else {
// No data in the current cycle
}
} while(!$EOF);
Please note that in this example, the script totally ignores everything aside from the input stream. Also, the third section of the "if" statement is for demonstration only.
edited Jan 27 '17 at 8:09
answered May 30 '16 at 13:18
Gergely Lukacsy
1,0871121
1,0871121
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
http://www.php.net/stream_select
Due to a limitation in the current Zend Engine it is not possible to
pass a constant modifier like NULL directly as a parameter to a
function which expects this parameter to be passed by reference.
Instead use a temporary variable or an expression with the leftmost
member being a temporary variable:
<?php $e = NULL; stream_select($r, $w, $e, 0); ?>
done that still same issue.
– AJ.
Aug 3 '12 at 16:13
without any additional info, I'd suggest to run the script with strace and check what's the return value of the underlying select syscall
– strkol
Aug 3 '12 at 16:16
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
http://www.php.net/stream_select
Due to a limitation in the current Zend Engine it is not possible to
pass a constant modifier like NULL directly as a parameter to a
function which expects this parameter to be passed by reference.
Instead use a temporary variable or an expression with the leftmost
member being a temporary variable:
<?php $e = NULL; stream_select($r, $w, $e, 0); ?>
done that still same issue.
– AJ.
Aug 3 '12 at 16:13
without any additional info, I'd suggest to run the script with strace and check what's the return value of the underlying select syscall
– strkol
Aug 3 '12 at 16:16
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
http://www.php.net/stream_select
Due to a limitation in the current Zend Engine it is not possible to
pass a constant modifier like NULL directly as a parameter to a
function which expects this parameter to be passed by reference.
Instead use a temporary variable or an expression with the leftmost
member being a temporary variable:
<?php $e = NULL; stream_select($r, $w, $e, 0); ?>
http://www.php.net/stream_select
Due to a limitation in the current Zend Engine it is not possible to
pass a constant modifier like NULL directly as a parameter to a
function which expects this parameter to be passed by reference.
Instead use a temporary variable or an expression with the leftmost
member being a temporary variable:
<?php $e = NULL; stream_select($r, $w, $e, 0); ?>
answered Aug 3 '12 at 16:08
strkol
1,4441111
1,4441111
done that still same issue.
– AJ.
Aug 3 '12 at 16:13
without any additional info, I'd suggest to run the script with strace and check what's the return value of the underlying select syscall
– strkol
Aug 3 '12 at 16:16
add a comment |
done that still same issue.
– AJ.
Aug 3 '12 at 16:13
without any additional info, I'd suggest to run the script with strace and check what's the return value of the underlying select syscall
– strkol
Aug 3 '12 at 16:16
done that still same issue.
– AJ.
Aug 3 '12 at 16:13
done that still same issue.
– AJ.
Aug 3 '12 at 16:13
without any additional info, I'd suggest to run the script with strace and check what's the return value of the underlying select syscall
– strkol
Aug 3 '12 at 16:16
without any additional info, I'd suggest to run the script with strace and check what's the return value of the underlying select syscall
– strkol
Aug 3 '12 at 16:16
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I have a similar issue which is caused by the underlying socket timeout.
Eg. I create some streams
$streams = stream_socket_pair(STREAM_PF_UNIX, STREAM_SOCK_STREAM, STREAM_IPPROTO_IP);
Then fork, and use a block such as the following
stream_set_blocking($pipes[1], 1);
stream_set_blocking($pipes[2], 1);
$pipesToRead = array($pipes[1], $pipes[2]);
while (!feof($pipesToRead[0]) || !feof($pipesToRead[1])) {
$reads = $pipesToRead;
$writes = null;
$excepts = $pipesToRead;
$tSec = null;
stream_select($reads, $writes, $excepts, $tSec);
// while it's generating any kind of output, duplicate it wherever it
// needs to go
foreach ($reads as &$read) {
$chunk = fread($read, 8192);
foreach ($streams as &$stream)
fwrite($stream, $chunk);
}
}
Glossing over what other things might be wrong there, my $tSec
argument to stream_select is ignored, and the "stream" will timeout after 60 seconds of inactivity and produce an EOF.
If I add the following after creating the streams
stream_set_timeout($streams[0], 999);
stream_set_timeout($streams[1], 999);
Then I get the result I desire, even if there's no activity on the underlying stream for longer than 60 seconds.
I feel that this might be a bug, because I don't want that EOF after 60 seconds of inactivity on the underlying stream, and I don't want to plug in some arbitrarily large value to avoid hitting the timeout if my processes are idle for some time.
In addition, even if the 60 second timeout remains, I think it should just timeout on my stream_select()
call and my loop should be able to continue.
Further reading of thetv_sec
argument tostream_select
(php.net/manual/en/function.stream-select.php) shows that when it's "null", the only way for the function to return is for an event to happen on one the streams. If PHP isn't going to hang indefinitely, this means the timeout value needs to be one such event, so I should not be surprised by this behaviour. I will try passing a value intv_sec
to see if it means I can remove the call tostream_set_timeout
...
– Andrew Sharpe
Dec 3 at 1:23
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I have a similar issue which is caused by the underlying socket timeout.
Eg. I create some streams
$streams = stream_socket_pair(STREAM_PF_UNIX, STREAM_SOCK_STREAM, STREAM_IPPROTO_IP);
Then fork, and use a block such as the following
stream_set_blocking($pipes[1], 1);
stream_set_blocking($pipes[2], 1);
$pipesToRead = array($pipes[1], $pipes[2]);
while (!feof($pipesToRead[0]) || !feof($pipesToRead[1])) {
$reads = $pipesToRead;
$writes = null;
$excepts = $pipesToRead;
$tSec = null;
stream_select($reads, $writes, $excepts, $tSec);
// while it's generating any kind of output, duplicate it wherever it
// needs to go
foreach ($reads as &$read) {
$chunk = fread($read, 8192);
foreach ($streams as &$stream)
fwrite($stream, $chunk);
}
}
Glossing over what other things might be wrong there, my $tSec
argument to stream_select is ignored, and the "stream" will timeout after 60 seconds of inactivity and produce an EOF.
If I add the following after creating the streams
stream_set_timeout($streams[0], 999);
stream_set_timeout($streams[1], 999);
Then I get the result I desire, even if there's no activity on the underlying stream for longer than 60 seconds.
I feel that this might be a bug, because I don't want that EOF after 60 seconds of inactivity on the underlying stream, and I don't want to plug in some arbitrarily large value to avoid hitting the timeout if my processes are idle for some time.
In addition, even if the 60 second timeout remains, I think it should just timeout on my stream_select()
call and my loop should be able to continue.
Further reading of thetv_sec
argument tostream_select
(php.net/manual/en/function.stream-select.php) shows that when it's "null", the only way for the function to return is for an event to happen on one the streams. If PHP isn't going to hang indefinitely, this means the timeout value needs to be one such event, so I should not be surprised by this behaviour. I will try passing a value intv_sec
to see if it means I can remove the call tostream_set_timeout
...
– Andrew Sharpe
Dec 3 at 1:23
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
I have a similar issue which is caused by the underlying socket timeout.
Eg. I create some streams
$streams = stream_socket_pair(STREAM_PF_UNIX, STREAM_SOCK_STREAM, STREAM_IPPROTO_IP);
Then fork, and use a block such as the following
stream_set_blocking($pipes[1], 1);
stream_set_blocking($pipes[2], 1);
$pipesToRead = array($pipes[1], $pipes[2]);
while (!feof($pipesToRead[0]) || !feof($pipesToRead[1])) {
$reads = $pipesToRead;
$writes = null;
$excepts = $pipesToRead;
$tSec = null;
stream_select($reads, $writes, $excepts, $tSec);
// while it's generating any kind of output, duplicate it wherever it
// needs to go
foreach ($reads as &$read) {
$chunk = fread($read, 8192);
foreach ($streams as &$stream)
fwrite($stream, $chunk);
}
}
Glossing over what other things might be wrong there, my $tSec
argument to stream_select is ignored, and the "stream" will timeout after 60 seconds of inactivity and produce an EOF.
If I add the following after creating the streams
stream_set_timeout($streams[0], 999);
stream_set_timeout($streams[1], 999);
Then I get the result I desire, even if there's no activity on the underlying stream for longer than 60 seconds.
I feel that this might be a bug, because I don't want that EOF after 60 seconds of inactivity on the underlying stream, and I don't want to plug in some arbitrarily large value to avoid hitting the timeout if my processes are idle for some time.
In addition, even if the 60 second timeout remains, I think it should just timeout on my stream_select()
call and my loop should be able to continue.
I have a similar issue which is caused by the underlying socket timeout.
Eg. I create some streams
$streams = stream_socket_pair(STREAM_PF_UNIX, STREAM_SOCK_STREAM, STREAM_IPPROTO_IP);
Then fork, and use a block such as the following
stream_set_blocking($pipes[1], 1);
stream_set_blocking($pipes[2], 1);
$pipesToRead = array($pipes[1], $pipes[2]);
while (!feof($pipesToRead[0]) || !feof($pipesToRead[1])) {
$reads = $pipesToRead;
$writes = null;
$excepts = $pipesToRead;
$tSec = null;
stream_select($reads, $writes, $excepts, $tSec);
// while it's generating any kind of output, duplicate it wherever it
// needs to go
foreach ($reads as &$read) {
$chunk = fread($read, 8192);
foreach ($streams as &$stream)
fwrite($stream, $chunk);
}
}
Glossing over what other things might be wrong there, my $tSec
argument to stream_select is ignored, and the "stream" will timeout after 60 seconds of inactivity and produce an EOF.
If I add the following after creating the streams
stream_set_timeout($streams[0], 999);
stream_set_timeout($streams[1], 999);
Then I get the result I desire, even if there's no activity on the underlying stream for longer than 60 seconds.
I feel that this might be a bug, because I don't want that EOF after 60 seconds of inactivity on the underlying stream, and I don't want to plug in some arbitrarily large value to avoid hitting the timeout if my processes are idle for some time.
In addition, even if the 60 second timeout remains, I think it should just timeout on my stream_select()
call and my loop should be able to continue.
answered Nov 20 at 2:53
Andrew Sharpe
132
132
Further reading of thetv_sec
argument tostream_select
(php.net/manual/en/function.stream-select.php) shows that when it's "null", the only way for the function to return is for an event to happen on one the streams. If PHP isn't going to hang indefinitely, this means the timeout value needs to be one such event, so I should not be surprised by this behaviour. I will try passing a value intv_sec
to see if it means I can remove the call tostream_set_timeout
...
– Andrew Sharpe
Dec 3 at 1:23
add a comment |
Further reading of thetv_sec
argument tostream_select
(php.net/manual/en/function.stream-select.php) shows that when it's "null", the only way for the function to return is for an event to happen on one the streams. If PHP isn't going to hang indefinitely, this means the timeout value needs to be one such event, so I should not be surprised by this behaviour. I will try passing a value intv_sec
to see if it means I can remove the call tostream_set_timeout
...
– Andrew Sharpe
Dec 3 at 1:23
Further reading of the
tv_sec
argument to stream_select
(php.net/manual/en/function.stream-select.php) shows that when it's "null", the only way for the function to return is for an event to happen on one the streams. If PHP isn't going to hang indefinitely, this means the timeout value needs to be one such event, so I should not be surprised by this behaviour. I will try passing a value in tv_sec
to see if it means I can remove the call to stream_set_timeout
...– Andrew Sharpe
Dec 3 at 1:23
Further reading of the
tv_sec
argument to stream_select
(php.net/manual/en/function.stream-select.php) shows that when it's "null", the only way for the function to return is for an event to happen on one the streams. If PHP isn't going to hang indefinitely, this means the timeout value needs to be one such event, so I should not be surprised by this behaviour. I will try passing a value in tv_sec
to see if it means I can remove the call to stream_set_timeout
...– Andrew Sharpe
Dec 3 at 1:23
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f11799252%2fissue-with-stream-select-in-php%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Did you solve it?
– Mattias Wadman
Aug 4 '12 at 15:47
nope I could not.
– AJ.
Aug 7 '12 at 17:20