Optimising for Scalability
I have working code in R
. I want to optimise it. At the moment I am inverting the matrix using Cholesky decomposition.
X<- matrix(rnorm(10000),20,20)
Y<-rnorm(20)
OSLOG<-function(X,Y,a){
if(a<=0){
print("a must be a positive number")
}else{
X<-as.matrix(X)
Y<-as.matrix(Y)
T<-nrow(X)
N<-ncol(X)
bt<- matrix(0,ncol=1,nrow=N)
At<- diag(0,N)
pred<- matrix(0,nrow=T,ncol=1)
theta0<- rep(1,N)
for (t in 1:T){
xt<-X[t,]
pred[t] <- crossprod(as.matrix(theta0), xt)
Dt <- diag(sqrt(abs(c(theta0))))
D <- outer(diag(Dt),diag(Dt))
At <- At + tcrossprod(xt,xt)
InvA <- chol2inv(chol(diag(a,N) + At*D))
bt <- bt + (Y[t] * xt)
theta0 <- crossprod(InvA *D,bt)
}
res<-postResample(pred = pred, obs = Y)
stats<- as.matrix(res)
quant<-quantile(as.matrix(Y)-as.matrix(pred),probs=c(.25,.50,.75))
return(list(predictions=pred,performance=stats,quantiles=quant))
}
}
OSLOG(X,Y,0.00001)$performance
The above code works perfectly well. Is it possible to use Sharman-Morrison in the above code? Also, any other thing I can do to improve performance?
I tried to improve the performance by using Sharman Morrison inversion. For some reason, I don't get the same result.
By replacing initialisation
, InvA
in the above code by the following
InvA <- At + tcrossprod(xt,xt)
InvA <- InvA - (tcrossprod(crossprod(InvA ,xt),crossprod(InvA,xt)) / as.numeric(crossprod(xt,crossprod(InvA,xt))+1))
where initialisation is At<- diag(1/a,N)
, but doing so gives a different result. Can someone help me with this, please?
performance r
New contributor
add a comment |
I have working code in R
. I want to optimise it. At the moment I am inverting the matrix using Cholesky decomposition.
X<- matrix(rnorm(10000),20,20)
Y<-rnorm(20)
OSLOG<-function(X,Y,a){
if(a<=0){
print("a must be a positive number")
}else{
X<-as.matrix(X)
Y<-as.matrix(Y)
T<-nrow(X)
N<-ncol(X)
bt<- matrix(0,ncol=1,nrow=N)
At<- diag(0,N)
pred<- matrix(0,nrow=T,ncol=1)
theta0<- rep(1,N)
for (t in 1:T){
xt<-X[t,]
pred[t] <- crossprod(as.matrix(theta0), xt)
Dt <- diag(sqrt(abs(c(theta0))))
D <- outer(diag(Dt),diag(Dt))
At <- At + tcrossprod(xt,xt)
InvA <- chol2inv(chol(diag(a,N) + At*D))
bt <- bt + (Y[t] * xt)
theta0 <- crossprod(InvA *D,bt)
}
res<-postResample(pred = pred, obs = Y)
stats<- as.matrix(res)
quant<-quantile(as.matrix(Y)-as.matrix(pred),probs=c(.25,.50,.75))
return(list(predictions=pred,performance=stats,quantiles=quant))
}
}
OSLOG(X,Y,0.00001)$performance
The above code works perfectly well. Is it possible to use Sharman-Morrison in the above code? Also, any other thing I can do to improve performance?
I tried to improve the performance by using Sharman Morrison inversion. For some reason, I don't get the same result.
By replacing initialisation
, InvA
in the above code by the following
InvA <- At + tcrossprod(xt,xt)
InvA <- InvA - (tcrossprod(crossprod(InvA ,xt),crossprod(InvA,xt)) / as.numeric(crossprod(xt,crossprod(InvA,xt))+1))
where initialisation is At<- diag(1/a,N)
, but doing so gives a different result. Can someone help me with this, please?
performance r
New contributor
Welcome to Code Review! Unfortunately this post is off-topic for this site. Please read What topics can I ask about here? - note that it states "If you are looking for feedback on a specific working piece of code...then you are in the right place!" Also, when posting your question, there should have been text on the side that read "Your question must contain code that is already working correctly..." When you have fixed the code, please update it here and it can be reviewed."
– Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ
1 hour ago
The code is working! I am just trying to optimise the code which is clearly on topic. I have updated the question hope it is more clear now.
– Jamil
59 mins ago
add a comment |
I have working code in R
. I want to optimise it. At the moment I am inverting the matrix using Cholesky decomposition.
X<- matrix(rnorm(10000),20,20)
Y<-rnorm(20)
OSLOG<-function(X,Y,a){
if(a<=0){
print("a must be a positive number")
}else{
X<-as.matrix(X)
Y<-as.matrix(Y)
T<-nrow(X)
N<-ncol(X)
bt<- matrix(0,ncol=1,nrow=N)
At<- diag(0,N)
pred<- matrix(0,nrow=T,ncol=1)
theta0<- rep(1,N)
for (t in 1:T){
xt<-X[t,]
pred[t] <- crossprod(as.matrix(theta0), xt)
Dt <- diag(sqrt(abs(c(theta0))))
D <- outer(diag(Dt),diag(Dt))
At <- At + tcrossprod(xt,xt)
InvA <- chol2inv(chol(diag(a,N) + At*D))
bt <- bt + (Y[t] * xt)
theta0 <- crossprod(InvA *D,bt)
}
res<-postResample(pred = pred, obs = Y)
stats<- as.matrix(res)
quant<-quantile(as.matrix(Y)-as.matrix(pred),probs=c(.25,.50,.75))
return(list(predictions=pred,performance=stats,quantiles=quant))
}
}
OSLOG(X,Y,0.00001)$performance
The above code works perfectly well. Is it possible to use Sharman-Morrison in the above code? Also, any other thing I can do to improve performance?
I tried to improve the performance by using Sharman Morrison inversion. For some reason, I don't get the same result.
By replacing initialisation
, InvA
in the above code by the following
InvA <- At + tcrossprod(xt,xt)
InvA <- InvA - (tcrossprod(crossprod(InvA ,xt),crossprod(InvA,xt)) / as.numeric(crossprod(xt,crossprod(InvA,xt))+1))
where initialisation is At<- diag(1/a,N)
, but doing so gives a different result. Can someone help me with this, please?
performance r
New contributor
I have working code in R
. I want to optimise it. At the moment I am inverting the matrix using Cholesky decomposition.
X<- matrix(rnorm(10000),20,20)
Y<-rnorm(20)
OSLOG<-function(X,Y,a){
if(a<=0){
print("a must be a positive number")
}else{
X<-as.matrix(X)
Y<-as.matrix(Y)
T<-nrow(X)
N<-ncol(X)
bt<- matrix(0,ncol=1,nrow=N)
At<- diag(0,N)
pred<- matrix(0,nrow=T,ncol=1)
theta0<- rep(1,N)
for (t in 1:T){
xt<-X[t,]
pred[t] <- crossprod(as.matrix(theta0), xt)
Dt <- diag(sqrt(abs(c(theta0))))
D <- outer(diag(Dt),diag(Dt))
At <- At + tcrossprod(xt,xt)
InvA <- chol2inv(chol(diag(a,N) + At*D))
bt <- bt + (Y[t] * xt)
theta0 <- crossprod(InvA *D,bt)
}
res<-postResample(pred = pred, obs = Y)
stats<- as.matrix(res)
quant<-quantile(as.matrix(Y)-as.matrix(pred),probs=c(.25,.50,.75))
return(list(predictions=pred,performance=stats,quantiles=quant))
}
}
OSLOG(X,Y,0.00001)$performance
The above code works perfectly well. Is it possible to use Sharman-Morrison in the above code? Also, any other thing I can do to improve performance?
I tried to improve the performance by using Sharman Morrison inversion. For some reason, I don't get the same result.
By replacing initialisation
, InvA
in the above code by the following
InvA <- At + tcrossprod(xt,xt)
InvA <- InvA - (tcrossprod(crossprod(InvA ,xt),crossprod(InvA,xt)) / as.numeric(crossprod(xt,crossprod(InvA,xt))+1))
where initialisation is At<- diag(1/a,N)
, but doing so gives a different result. Can someone help me with this, please?
performance r
performance r
New contributor
New contributor
edited 3 mins ago
New contributor
asked 1 hour ago
Jamil
11
11
New contributor
New contributor
Welcome to Code Review! Unfortunately this post is off-topic for this site. Please read What topics can I ask about here? - note that it states "If you are looking for feedback on a specific working piece of code...then you are in the right place!" Also, when posting your question, there should have been text on the side that read "Your question must contain code that is already working correctly..." When you have fixed the code, please update it here and it can be reviewed."
– Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ
1 hour ago
The code is working! I am just trying to optimise the code which is clearly on topic. I have updated the question hope it is more clear now.
– Jamil
59 mins ago
add a comment |
Welcome to Code Review! Unfortunately this post is off-topic for this site. Please read What topics can I ask about here? - note that it states "If you are looking for feedback on a specific working piece of code...then you are in the right place!" Also, when posting your question, there should have been text on the side that read "Your question must contain code that is already working correctly..." When you have fixed the code, please update it here and it can be reviewed."
– Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ
1 hour ago
The code is working! I am just trying to optimise the code which is clearly on topic. I have updated the question hope it is more clear now.
– Jamil
59 mins ago
Welcome to Code Review! Unfortunately this post is off-topic for this site. Please read What topics can I ask about here? - note that it states "If you are looking for feedback on a specific working piece of code...then you are in the right place!" Also, when posting your question, there should have been text on the side that read "Your question must contain code that is already working correctly..." When you have fixed the code, please update it here and it can be reviewed."
– Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ
1 hour ago
Welcome to Code Review! Unfortunately this post is off-topic for this site. Please read What topics can I ask about here? - note that it states "If you are looking for feedback on a specific working piece of code...then you are in the right place!" Also, when posting your question, there should have been text on the side that read "Your question must contain code that is already working correctly..." When you have fixed the code, please update it here and it can be reviewed."
– Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ
1 hour ago
The code is working! I am just trying to optimise the code which is clearly on topic. I have updated the question hope it is more clear now.
– Jamil
59 mins ago
The code is working! I am just trying to optimise the code which is clearly on topic. I have updated the question hope it is more clear now.
– Jamil
59 mins ago
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Jamil is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f210299%2foptimising-for-scalability%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Jamil is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jamil is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jamil is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jamil is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f210299%2foptimising-for-scalability%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Welcome to Code Review! Unfortunately this post is off-topic for this site. Please read What topics can I ask about here? - note that it states "If you are looking for feedback on a specific working piece of code...then you are in the right place!" Also, when posting your question, there should have been text on the side that read "Your question must contain code that is already working correctly..." When you have fixed the code, please update it here and it can be reviewed."
– Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ
1 hour ago
The code is working! I am just trying to optimise the code which is clearly on topic. I have updated the question hope it is more clear now.
– Jamil
59 mins ago