What is the best way to return data to users when using event-driven microservices?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am using a microservice architecture for this current project using RabbitMQ as a message broker. My issue is determining the best possible way to make "requests" to the microservices and return back the eventual response, currently I have a socket.io socket running and connecting the browser client to that and sending events to the socket, the socket reads the events and publishes them into RabbitMQ, and of course they are then consumed by the services.
So my question:
Is my current setup good enough to just keep using or is there other ways that are better?
events socket.io rabbitmq microservices messaging
asked Nov 19 at 21:23
Twoscore
1
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am using a microservice architecture for this current project using RabbitMQ as a message broker. My issue is determining the best possible way to make "requests" to the microservices and return back the eventual response, currently I have a socket.io socket running and connecting the browser client to that and sending events to the socket, the socket reads the events and publishes them into RabbitMQ, and of course they are then consumed by the services.
So my question:
Is my current setup good enough to just keep using or is there other ways that are better?
events socket.io rabbitmq microservices messaging
asked Nov 19 at 21:23
Twoscore
1
You could just use STOMP - Rabbit supports it natively. But what "good enough" and "better" mean are wholly subjective - what are the criteria of assessment here?
– Boris the Spider
Nov 19 at 21:28
@BoristheSpider Mainly its ability to be easily maintainable and scalable.
– Twoscore
Nov 19 at 21:33
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am using a microservice architecture for this current project using RabbitMQ as a message broker. My issue is determining the best possible way to make "requests" to the microservices and return back the eventual response, currently I have a socket.io socket running and connecting the browser client to that and sending events to the socket, the socket reads the events and publishes them into RabbitMQ, and of course they are then consumed by the services.
So my question:
Is my current setup good enough to just keep using or is there other ways that are better?
events socket.io rabbitmq microservices messaging
asked Nov 19 at 21:23
Twoscore
1
I am using a microservice architecture for this current project using RabbitMQ as a message broker. My issue is determining the best possible way to make "requests" to the microservices and return back the eventual response, currently I have a socket.io socket running and connecting the browser client to that and sending events to the socket, the socket reads the events and publishes them into RabbitMQ, and of course they are then consumed by the services.
So my question:
Is my current setup good enough to just keep using or is there other ways that are better?
events socket.io rabbitmq microservices messaging
events socket.io rabbitmq microservices messaging
asked Nov 19 at 21:23
Twoscore
1
asked Nov 19 at 21:23
Twoscore
1
asked Nov 19 at 21:23
Twoscore
1
asked Nov 19 at 21:23
Twoscore
1
asked Nov 19 at 21:23
Twoscore
1
1
You could just use STOMP - Rabbit supports it natively. But what "good enough" and "better" mean are wholly subjective - what are the criteria of assessment here?
– Boris the Spider
Nov 19 at 21:28
@BoristheSpider Mainly its ability to be easily maintainable and scalable.
– Twoscore
Nov 19 at 21:33
add a comment |
You could just use STOMP - Rabbit supports it natively. But what "good enough" and "better" mean are wholly subjective - what are the criteria of assessment here?
– Boris the Spider
Nov 19 at 21:28
@BoristheSpider Mainly its ability to be easily maintainable and scalable.
– Twoscore
Nov 19 at 21:33
You could just use STOMP - Rabbit supports it natively. But what "good enough" and "better" mean are wholly subjective - what are the criteria of assessment here?
– Boris the Spider
Nov 19 at 21:28
You could just use STOMP - Rabbit supports it natively. But what "good enough" and "better" mean are wholly subjective - what are the criteria of assessment here?
– Boris the Spider
Nov 19 at 21:28
@BoristheSpider Mainly its ability to be easily maintainable and scalable.
– Twoscore
Nov 19 at 21:33
@BoristheSpider Mainly its ability to be easily maintainable and scalable.
– Twoscore
Nov 19 at 21:33
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53382839%2fwhat-is-the-best-way-to-return-data-to-users-when-using-event-driven-microservic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53382839%2fwhat-is-the-best-way-to-return-data-to-users-when-using-event-driven-microservic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
You could just use STOMP - Rabbit supports it natively. But what "good enough" and "better" mean are wholly subjective - what are the criteria of assessment here?
– Boris the Spider
Nov 19 at 21:28
@BoristheSpider Mainly its ability to be easily maintainable and scalable.
– Twoscore
Nov 19 at 21:33