High pressure canisters of air as gun-less projectiles












4












$begingroup$


Imagine a small metal canister, with a narrow exit on the top. There is a sort of door covering this, with a metal plate that is removed from the side. The pressure inside of the canister acts as a propellant, launching the weapon forward and propelling it through flight.



My question is: would this work? Some reasons I can think of that may cause this to not work:




  • Horrible accuracy

  • The opening would have to be too small to be plausible

  • The canister would run out of air instantly, and fall to the ground shortly after

  • The cost/energy of producing them is ridiculous


Imagine modern or slightly above modern tech, and enemies at distances of +/- 50 meters.






weapons







share|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    here's a Question i asked that is similar hope it can give you some pointers worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/105342/…
    $endgroup$
    – Creed Arcon
    49 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    "The canister would run out of air instantly, and fall to the ground shortly after" - The laws of physics say that second part doesn't happen (at least, in a way that makes the weapon ineffective). Consider your typical projectile fired out of a gun. It stops receiving thrust "instantly" (as soon as it exits the barrel), but can remain airborne long enough to accurately strike targets hundreds of meters away or more.
    $endgroup$
    – aroth
    15 mins ago


















4












$begingroup$


Imagine a small metal canister, with a narrow exit on the top. There is a sort of door covering this, with a metal plate that is removed from the side. The pressure inside of the canister acts as a propellant, launching the weapon forward and propelling it through flight.



My question is: would this work? Some reasons I can think of that may cause this to not work:




  • Horrible accuracy

  • The opening would have to be too small to be plausible

  • The canister would run out of air instantly, and fall to the ground shortly after

  • The cost/energy of producing them is ridiculous


Imagine modern or slightly above modern tech, and enemies at distances of +/- 50 meters.






weapons







share|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    here's a Question i asked that is similar hope it can give you some pointers worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/105342/…
    $endgroup$
    – Creed Arcon
    49 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    "The canister would run out of air instantly, and fall to the ground shortly after" - The laws of physics say that second part doesn't happen (at least, in a way that makes the weapon ineffective). Consider your typical projectile fired out of a gun. It stops receiving thrust "instantly" (as soon as it exits the barrel), but can remain airborne long enough to accurately strike targets hundreds of meters away or more.
    $endgroup$
    – aroth
    15 mins ago
















4












4








4





$begingroup$


Imagine a small metal canister, with a narrow exit on the top. There is a sort of door covering this, with a metal plate that is removed from the side. The pressure inside of the canister acts as a propellant, launching the weapon forward and propelling it through flight.



My question is: would this work? Some reasons I can think of that may cause this to not work:




  • Horrible accuracy

  • The opening would have to be too small to be plausible

  • The canister would run out of air instantly, and fall to the ground shortly after

  • The cost/energy of producing them is ridiculous


Imagine modern or slightly above modern tech, and enemies at distances of +/- 50 meters.






weapons







share|improve this question









$endgroup$




Imagine a small metal canister, with a narrow exit on the top. There is a sort of door covering this, with a metal plate that is removed from the side. The pressure inside of the canister acts as a propellant, launching the weapon forward and propelling it through flight.



My question is: would this work? Some reasons I can think of that may cause this to not work:




  • Horrible accuracy

  • The opening would have to be too small to be plausible

  • The canister would run out of air instantly, and fall to the ground shortly after

  • The cost/energy of producing them is ridiculous


Imagine modern or slightly above modern tech, and enemies at distances of +/- 50 meters.






weapons




weapons






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 2 hours ago









Redwolf ProgramsRedwolf Programs

9481722




9481722












  • $begingroup$
    here's a Question i asked that is similar hope it can give you some pointers worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/105342/…
    $endgroup$
    – Creed Arcon
    49 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    "The canister would run out of air instantly, and fall to the ground shortly after" - The laws of physics say that second part doesn't happen (at least, in a way that makes the weapon ineffective). Consider your typical projectile fired out of a gun. It stops receiving thrust "instantly" (as soon as it exits the barrel), but can remain airborne long enough to accurately strike targets hundreds of meters away or more.
    $endgroup$
    – aroth
    15 mins ago




















  • $begingroup$
    here's a Question i asked that is similar hope it can give you some pointers worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/105342/…
    $endgroup$
    – Creed Arcon
    49 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    "The canister would run out of air instantly, and fall to the ground shortly after" - The laws of physics say that second part doesn't happen (at least, in a way that makes the weapon ineffective). Consider your typical projectile fired out of a gun. It stops receiving thrust "instantly" (as soon as it exits the barrel), but can remain airborne long enough to accurately strike targets hundreds of meters away or more.
    $endgroup$
    – aroth
    15 mins ago


















$begingroup$
here's a Question i asked that is similar hope it can give you some pointers worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/105342/…
$endgroup$
– Creed Arcon
49 mins ago




$begingroup$
here's a Question i asked that is similar hope it can give you some pointers worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/105342/…
$endgroup$
– Creed Arcon
49 mins ago












$begingroup$
"The canister would run out of air instantly, and fall to the ground shortly after" - The laws of physics say that second part doesn't happen (at least, in a way that makes the weapon ineffective). Consider your typical projectile fired out of a gun. It stops receiving thrust "instantly" (as soon as it exits the barrel), but can remain airborne long enough to accurately strike targets hundreds of meters away or more.
$endgroup$
– aroth
15 mins ago






$begingroup$
"The canister would run out of air instantly, and fall to the ground shortly after" - The laws of physics say that second part doesn't happen (at least, in a way that makes the weapon ineffective). Consider your typical projectile fired out of a gun. It stops receiving thrust "instantly" (as soon as it exits the barrel), but can remain airborne long enough to accurately strike targets hundreds of meters away or more.
$endgroup$
– aroth
15 mins ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

Here at Weapons R Us, we strive to offer the latest in amazingly inaccurate & astoundingly cumbersome weapons. In fact, we offer two models of precisely the weapons system you're looking for!



enter image description here



First, our Basic Can & Stick; this is our easy to understand, step by step how-to instructional video, shot on site at our manufacturing plant in Siberia.



Second, our Deluxe Rocket Can; this is Myth Busters trying our our latest product!



And finally, at WRS's Backcountry R & D facility; here we are testing our anti-aircraft launch mechanism.



Basic model takes a bit of coaxing to activate, but is quite effective. Our deluxe model is, generally speaking, an instant success! Contrary to mythconception, this weapon system is relatively easy to mass produce and not terribly expensive. As you can imagine, even the cans are recyclable!






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Can't stop laughing at the first one...
    $endgroup$
    – Redwolf Programs
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    I admit it. I watched all three of those videos. Ha ha ha!
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Darwin Award Winner wannabees.
    $endgroup$
    – Justin Thyme the Second
    39 mins ago



















1












$begingroup$

A resounding 'yes' at +/- 50 meters.



The compressed CO2 cylinders used in air guns have enough force to launch the cylinders at least 50 m.



They are used to propel rocket car models, rockets, and such. We had a stray (one that came out of the end of a rocket) ricochet back and forth in a classroom 20 m long. Left dents in several places in the walls. The trick would be to launch them in a tube just slightly larger than the gas cylinder. The firing pin would be exactly that - a pin that punctures a small hole in the nozzle end. We used a hammer and a nail. Put a hardened bullet-type nose on them, and maybe a trailing rigid tail or stability, and you would certainly have a weapon that would hurt.



These CO2 cylinders can be made quite inexpensively, although probably not cost competitive with bullets.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "579"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f140601%2fhigh-pressure-canisters-of-air-as-gun-less-projectiles%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5












    $begingroup$

    Here at Weapons R Us, we strive to offer the latest in amazingly inaccurate & astoundingly cumbersome weapons. In fact, we offer two models of precisely the weapons system you're looking for!



    enter image description here



    First, our Basic Can & Stick; this is our easy to understand, step by step how-to instructional video, shot on site at our manufacturing plant in Siberia.



    Second, our Deluxe Rocket Can; this is Myth Busters trying our our latest product!



    And finally, at WRS's Backcountry R & D facility; here we are testing our anti-aircraft launch mechanism.



    Basic model takes a bit of coaxing to activate, but is quite effective. Our deluxe model is, generally speaking, an instant success! Contrary to mythconception, this weapon system is relatively easy to mass produce and not terribly expensive. As you can imagine, even the cans are recyclable!






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Can't stop laughing at the first one...
      $endgroup$
      – Redwolf Programs
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      I admit it. I watched all three of those videos. Ha ha ha!
      $endgroup$
      – Cyn
      1 hour ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Darwin Award Winner wannabees.
      $endgroup$
      – Justin Thyme the Second
      39 mins ago
















    5












    $begingroup$

    Here at Weapons R Us, we strive to offer the latest in amazingly inaccurate & astoundingly cumbersome weapons. In fact, we offer two models of precisely the weapons system you're looking for!



    enter image description here



    First, our Basic Can & Stick; this is our easy to understand, step by step how-to instructional video, shot on site at our manufacturing plant in Siberia.



    Second, our Deluxe Rocket Can; this is Myth Busters trying our our latest product!



    And finally, at WRS's Backcountry R & D facility; here we are testing our anti-aircraft launch mechanism.



    Basic model takes a bit of coaxing to activate, but is quite effective. Our deluxe model is, generally speaking, an instant success! Contrary to mythconception, this weapon system is relatively easy to mass produce and not terribly expensive. As you can imagine, even the cans are recyclable!






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Can't stop laughing at the first one...
      $endgroup$
      – Redwolf Programs
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      I admit it. I watched all three of those videos. Ha ha ha!
      $endgroup$
      – Cyn
      1 hour ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Darwin Award Winner wannabees.
      $endgroup$
      – Justin Thyme the Second
      39 mins ago














    5












    5








    5





    $begingroup$

    Here at Weapons R Us, we strive to offer the latest in amazingly inaccurate & astoundingly cumbersome weapons. In fact, we offer two models of precisely the weapons system you're looking for!



    enter image description here



    First, our Basic Can & Stick; this is our easy to understand, step by step how-to instructional video, shot on site at our manufacturing plant in Siberia.



    Second, our Deluxe Rocket Can; this is Myth Busters trying our our latest product!



    And finally, at WRS's Backcountry R & D facility; here we are testing our anti-aircraft launch mechanism.



    Basic model takes a bit of coaxing to activate, but is quite effective. Our deluxe model is, generally speaking, an instant success! Contrary to mythconception, this weapon system is relatively easy to mass produce and not terribly expensive. As you can imagine, even the cans are recyclable!






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Here at Weapons R Us, we strive to offer the latest in amazingly inaccurate & astoundingly cumbersome weapons. In fact, we offer two models of precisely the weapons system you're looking for!



    enter image description here



    First, our Basic Can & Stick; this is our easy to understand, step by step how-to instructional video, shot on site at our manufacturing plant in Siberia.



    Second, our Deluxe Rocket Can; this is Myth Busters trying our our latest product!



    And finally, at WRS's Backcountry R & D facility; here we are testing our anti-aircraft launch mechanism.



    Basic model takes a bit of coaxing to activate, but is quite effective. Our deluxe model is, generally speaking, an instant success! Contrary to mythconception, this weapon system is relatively easy to mass produce and not terribly expensive. As you can imagine, even the cans are recyclable!







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 1 hour ago

























    answered 2 hours ago









    elemtilaselemtilas

    13.9k22861




    13.9k22861








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Can't stop laughing at the first one...
      $endgroup$
      – Redwolf Programs
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      I admit it. I watched all three of those videos. Ha ha ha!
      $endgroup$
      – Cyn
      1 hour ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Darwin Award Winner wannabees.
      $endgroup$
      – Justin Thyme the Second
      39 mins ago














    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Can't stop laughing at the first one...
      $endgroup$
      – Redwolf Programs
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      I admit it. I watched all three of those videos. Ha ha ha!
      $endgroup$
      – Cyn
      1 hour ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Darwin Award Winner wannabees.
      $endgroup$
      – Justin Thyme the Second
      39 mins ago








    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Can't stop laughing at the first one...
    $endgroup$
    – Redwolf Programs
    1 hour ago




    $begingroup$
    Can't stop laughing at the first one...
    $endgroup$
    – Redwolf Programs
    1 hour ago












    $begingroup$
    I admit it. I watched all three of those videos. Ha ha ha!
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    1 hour ago




    $begingroup$
    I admit it. I watched all three of those videos. Ha ha ha!
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    1 hour ago




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Darwin Award Winner wannabees.
    $endgroup$
    – Justin Thyme the Second
    39 mins ago




    $begingroup$
    Darwin Award Winner wannabees.
    $endgroup$
    – Justin Thyme the Second
    39 mins ago











    1












    $begingroup$

    A resounding 'yes' at +/- 50 meters.



    The compressed CO2 cylinders used in air guns have enough force to launch the cylinders at least 50 m.



    They are used to propel rocket car models, rockets, and such. We had a stray (one that came out of the end of a rocket) ricochet back and forth in a classroom 20 m long. Left dents in several places in the walls. The trick would be to launch them in a tube just slightly larger than the gas cylinder. The firing pin would be exactly that - a pin that punctures a small hole in the nozzle end. We used a hammer and a nail. Put a hardened bullet-type nose on them, and maybe a trailing rigid tail or stability, and you would certainly have a weapon that would hurt.



    These CO2 cylinders can be made quite inexpensively, although probably not cost competitive with bullets.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      A resounding 'yes' at +/- 50 meters.



      The compressed CO2 cylinders used in air guns have enough force to launch the cylinders at least 50 m.



      They are used to propel rocket car models, rockets, and such. We had a stray (one that came out of the end of a rocket) ricochet back and forth in a classroom 20 m long. Left dents in several places in the walls. The trick would be to launch them in a tube just slightly larger than the gas cylinder. The firing pin would be exactly that - a pin that punctures a small hole in the nozzle end. We used a hammer and a nail. Put a hardened bullet-type nose on them, and maybe a trailing rigid tail or stability, and you would certainly have a weapon that would hurt.



      These CO2 cylinders can be made quite inexpensively, although probably not cost competitive with bullets.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        A resounding 'yes' at +/- 50 meters.



        The compressed CO2 cylinders used in air guns have enough force to launch the cylinders at least 50 m.



        They are used to propel rocket car models, rockets, and such. We had a stray (one that came out of the end of a rocket) ricochet back and forth in a classroom 20 m long. Left dents in several places in the walls. The trick would be to launch them in a tube just slightly larger than the gas cylinder. The firing pin would be exactly that - a pin that punctures a small hole in the nozzle end. We used a hammer and a nail. Put a hardened bullet-type nose on them, and maybe a trailing rigid tail or stability, and you would certainly have a weapon that would hurt.



        These CO2 cylinders can be made quite inexpensively, although probably not cost competitive with bullets.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        A resounding 'yes' at +/- 50 meters.



        The compressed CO2 cylinders used in air guns have enough force to launch the cylinders at least 50 m.



        They are used to propel rocket car models, rockets, and such. We had a stray (one that came out of the end of a rocket) ricochet back and forth in a classroom 20 m long. Left dents in several places in the walls. The trick would be to launch them in a tube just slightly larger than the gas cylinder. The firing pin would be exactly that - a pin that punctures a small hole in the nozzle end. We used a hammer and a nail. Put a hardened bullet-type nose on them, and maybe a trailing rigid tail or stability, and you would certainly have a weapon that would hurt.



        These CO2 cylinders can be made quite inexpensively, although probably not cost competitive with bullets.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 28 mins ago









        Justin Thyme the SecondJustin Thyme the Second

        5826




        5826






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f140601%2fhigh-pressure-canisters-of-air-as-gun-less-projectiles%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Costa Masnaga

            Image
            .mw-parser-output .avviso .mbox-text-div>div,.mw-parser-output .avviso .mbox-text-full-div>div{font-size:90%}.mw-parser-output .avviso .mbox-image div{width:52px}.mw-parser-output .avviso .mbox-text-full-div .hide-when-compact{display:block} Questa voce o sezione sull'argomento Lombardia non cita le fonti necessarie o quelle presenti sono insufficienti . Puoi migliorare questa voce aggiungendo citazioni da fonti attendibili secondo le linee guida sull'uso delle fonti. Segui i suggerimenti del progetto di riferimento. Costa Masnaga comune Localizzazione Stato   Italia Regione Lombardia Provincia Lecco Amministrazione Sindaco Sabina Panzeri (Al centro il cittadino) dall'08/06/2009 Territorio Coordinate 45°46′N 9°17′E  /  45.766667°N 9.283333°E 45.766667; 9.283333  ( Costa Masnaga ) Coordinate: 45°46′N 9°17′E  /  45.766667°N 9.283333°E 45.766667; 9.283333  ( Costa Masnaga ) Altitudine 318 m s.l.m...
            Read more

            Fotorealismo

            Image
            Guerrino Boatto, Venice's St. Barnaba Church and canal Il fotorealismo è un genere di pittura basato sull'uso di una o più fotografie dalle quali l'artista prende le informazioni necessarie da utilizzare poi nel processo della creazione dell'opera, in genere ad olio o ad acrilico, al fine di avere un aspetto finale il più simile possibile alla fotografia. Indice 1 Storia 2 Lista dei fotorealisti 3 Note 4 Voci correlate 5 Altri progetti Storia | Il fotorealismo è un movimento che nasce negli Stati Uniti d'America alla fine degli anni sessanta [1] sulla scia della Pop Art [2] [3] [4] , e insieme condividono il carattere reazionario verso la travolgente ascesa dei media, che alla metà del ventesimo secolo si trasforma in un fenomeno di massa talmente imponente da minacciare il valore dell'immagine nell'arte. [5] [6] Ne consegue così che, colto il gesto d'inizio che fu della Pop Art, i fotorealisti aprono ad un ...
            Read more

            Sidney Franklin

            Image
            Questa voce sull'argomento registi statunitensi è solo un abbozzo . Contribuisci a migliorarla secondo le convenzioni di Wikipedia. Sidney Franklin, foto di Carl Van Vechten Oscar alla memoria Irving G. Thalberg 1943 Sidney Franklin , all'anagrafe Sidney Arnold Franklin , (San Francisco, 21 marzo 1893 – Santa Monica, 18 maggio 1972), è stato un regista, produttore cinematografico e attore statunitense. Il 20 giugno 1963, si sposò con l'attrice australiana Enid Bennett. Il matrimonio durò fino alla morte dell'attrice, il 14 maggio 1969 [1] Indice 1 Filmografia 1.1 Regista 1.2 Aiuto regia (parziale) 1.3 Produttore 1.4 Attore (parziale) 2 Note 3 Altri progetti 4 Collegamenti esterni Filmografia | Regista | The Baby , co-regia Chester M. Franklin (1915) The Rivals , co-regia Chester M. Franklin (1915) Little Dick's First Case , co-regia Chester M. Franklin (1915) Her Filmland Hero , co-...
            Read more