EF Core Many-to-Many hide pivot












2














I'm still learning .NET Core 2.1. I'm working on a Web API where I use EF Core. Currently I'm working on a many to many relationship between Users and Roles. I wanted to hide the pivot, but it ended out being a bit hacky i think, so I wanted to see what I could do to improve it.



I started out with something like this:



public class User
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string UserName { get; set; }

public virtual ICollection<UserRole> UserRoles { get; set; }
}

public class Role
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }

public virtual ICollection<UserRole> UserRoles { get; set; }
}

public class UserRole
{
public int UserId { get; set; }
public int RoleId { get; set; }
}


That works just fine, I then wanted to add an IEnumerable<Role> to the user for easier accessibility and for a prettier JSON output. I found an article online which did that like this:



public class User
{
// All of the previous code
[NotMapped]
public virtual IEnumerable<Role> Roles => UserRoles.Select(x => x.Role);
}


I can then get users and roles:



_context.Users.Include(x => x.UserRoles).ThenInclude(y => y.Role)


The thing is, sometimes, I only wish to get the users without the roles:



_context.Users


That makes the program crash, as UserRoles is null, then .Select(x => x.Role) will fail.



My fix to the User class was the following:



public class User
{
public virtual IEnumerable<Role> Roles
{
get
{
if (UserRoles == null) return null;
return UserRoles.Select(x => x.Role);
}
}
}


But to me, that is a really hacky and ugly solution to the problem. I just don't know how I can simplify it. I tried doing something like



public virtual IEnumerable<Role> Roles => UserRoles.Select(x => x?.Role);


I want to have something just as simple as the above line, but it should actually work as intended.










share|improve this question






















  • Don't trust online articles. Messing up your entity model with not mapped properties which look like navigation properties is confusing and error prone (you can easily try to use them inside the LINQ to Entities query and get surprised). For easier accessibility and for a prettier JSON output, create special classes (a.k.a DTO, ViewModel etc.) and use projection (Select) or library like AutoMapper to map the data to/from the entity model.
    – Ivan Stoev
    Nov 20 '18 at 20:23












  • @IvanStoev I fixed it with: public virtual IEnumerable<Role> Roles => UserRoles?.Select(ur => ur.Role);, but you still this doesn't makes sense to have in this entity model? Are you saying that all entity models should have their own DTO, even if they are identical?
    – Algorythm
    Nov 20 '18 at 20:34










  • Indeed. And they are not identical. With DTOs/ViewModels you have full control over how the data looks and what is serialized. For instance, the bidirectional entity models (with navigation properties at both side of the relationship) lead to circular problems during JSON serialization. Or unexpected lazy loading (when enabled) at the time it is not expected. Etc. Not to mention the L2E query issues (client evaluation, NRE etc.)
    – Ivan Stoev
    Nov 20 '18 at 20:39


















2














I'm still learning .NET Core 2.1. I'm working on a Web API where I use EF Core. Currently I'm working on a many to many relationship between Users and Roles. I wanted to hide the pivot, but it ended out being a bit hacky i think, so I wanted to see what I could do to improve it.



I started out with something like this:



public class User
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string UserName { get; set; }

public virtual ICollection<UserRole> UserRoles { get; set; }
}

public class Role
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }

public virtual ICollection<UserRole> UserRoles { get; set; }
}

public class UserRole
{
public int UserId { get; set; }
public int RoleId { get; set; }
}


That works just fine, I then wanted to add an IEnumerable<Role> to the user for easier accessibility and for a prettier JSON output. I found an article online which did that like this:



public class User
{
// All of the previous code
[NotMapped]
public virtual IEnumerable<Role> Roles => UserRoles.Select(x => x.Role);
}


I can then get users and roles:



_context.Users.Include(x => x.UserRoles).ThenInclude(y => y.Role)


The thing is, sometimes, I only wish to get the users without the roles:



_context.Users


That makes the program crash, as UserRoles is null, then .Select(x => x.Role) will fail.



My fix to the User class was the following:



public class User
{
public virtual IEnumerable<Role> Roles
{
get
{
if (UserRoles == null) return null;
return UserRoles.Select(x => x.Role);
}
}
}


But to me, that is a really hacky and ugly solution to the problem. I just don't know how I can simplify it. I tried doing something like



public virtual IEnumerable<Role> Roles => UserRoles.Select(x => x?.Role);


I want to have something just as simple as the above line, but it should actually work as intended.










share|improve this question






















  • Don't trust online articles. Messing up your entity model with not mapped properties which look like navigation properties is confusing and error prone (you can easily try to use them inside the LINQ to Entities query and get surprised). For easier accessibility and for a prettier JSON output, create special classes (a.k.a DTO, ViewModel etc.) and use projection (Select) or library like AutoMapper to map the data to/from the entity model.
    – Ivan Stoev
    Nov 20 '18 at 20:23












  • @IvanStoev I fixed it with: public virtual IEnumerable<Role> Roles => UserRoles?.Select(ur => ur.Role);, but you still this doesn't makes sense to have in this entity model? Are you saying that all entity models should have their own DTO, even if they are identical?
    – Algorythm
    Nov 20 '18 at 20:34










  • Indeed. And they are not identical. With DTOs/ViewModels you have full control over how the data looks and what is serialized. For instance, the bidirectional entity models (with navigation properties at both side of the relationship) lead to circular problems during JSON serialization. Or unexpected lazy loading (when enabled) at the time it is not expected. Etc. Not to mention the L2E query issues (client evaluation, NRE etc.)
    – Ivan Stoev
    Nov 20 '18 at 20:39
















2












2








2







I'm still learning .NET Core 2.1. I'm working on a Web API where I use EF Core. Currently I'm working on a many to many relationship between Users and Roles. I wanted to hide the pivot, but it ended out being a bit hacky i think, so I wanted to see what I could do to improve it.



I started out with something like this:



public class User
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string UserName { get; set; }

public virtual ICollection<UserRole> UserRoles { get; set; }
}

public class Role
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }

public virtual ICollection<UserRole> UserRoles { get; set; }
}

public class UserRole
{
public int UserId { get; set; }
public int RoleId { get; set; }
}


That works just fine, I then wanted to add an IEnumerable<Role> to the user for easier accessibility and for a prettier JSON output. I found an article online which did that like this:



public class User
{
// All of the previous code
[NotMapped]
public virtual IEnumerable<Role> Roles => UserRoles.Select(x => x.Role);
}


I can then get users and roles:



_context.Users.Include(x => x.UserRoles).ThenInclude(y => y.Role)


The thing is, sometimes, I only wish to get the users without the roles:



_context.Users


That makes the program crash, as UserRoles is null, then .Select(x => x.Role) will fail.



My fix to the User class was the following:



public class User
{
public virtual IEnumerable<Role> Roles
{
get
{
if (UserRoles == null) return null;
return UserRoles.Select(x => x.Role);
}
}
}


But to me, that is a really hacky and ugly solution to the problem. I just don't know how I can simplify it. I tried doing something like



public virtual IEnumerable<Role> Roles => UserRoles.Select(x => x?.Role);


I want to have something just as simple as the above line, but it should actually work as intended.










share|improve this question













I'm still learning .NET Core 2.1. I'm working on a Web API where I use EF Core. Currently I'm working on a many to many relationship between Users and Roles. I wanted to hide the pivot, but it ended out being a bit hacky i think, so I wanted to see what I could do to improve it.



I started out with something like this:



public class User
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string UserName { get; set; }

public virtual ICollection<UserRole> UserRoles { get; set; }
}

public class Role
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }

public virtual ICollection<UserRole> UserRoles { get; set; }
}

public class UserRole
{
public int UserId { get; set; }
public int RoleId { get; set; }
}


That works just fine, I then wanted to add an IEnumerable<Role> to the user for easier accessibility and for a prettier JSON output. I found an article online which did that like this:



public class User
{
// All of the previous code
[NotMapped]
public virtual IEnumerable<Role> Roles => UserRoles.Select(x => x.Role);
}


I can then get users and roles:



_context.Users.Include(x => x.UserRoles).ThenInclude(y => y.Role)


The thing is, sometimes, I only wish to get the users without the roles:



_context.Users


That makes the program crash, as UserRoles is null, then .Select(x => x.Role) will fail.



My fix to the User class was the following:



public class User
{
public virtual IEnumerable<Role> Roles
{
get
{
if (UserRoles == null) return null;
return UserRoles.Select(x => x.Role);
}
}
}


But to me, that is a really hacky and ugly solution to the problem. I just don't know how I can simplify it. I tried doing something like



public virtual IEnumerable<Role> Roles => UserRoles.Select(x => x?.Role);


I want to have something just as simple as the above line, but it should actually work as intended.







c# many-to-many ef-core-2.1






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 20 '18 at 19:11









Algorythm

183




183












  • Don't trust online articles. Messing up your entity model with not mapped properties which look like navigation properties is confusing and error prone (you can easily try to use them inside the LINQ to Entities query and get surprised). For easier accessibility and for a prettier JSON output, create special classes (a.k.a DTO, ViewModel etc.) and use projection (Select) or library like AutoMapper to map the data to/from the entity model.
    – Ivan Stoev
    Nov 20 '18 at 20:23












  • @IvanStoev I fixed it with: public virtual IEnumerable<Role> Roles => UserRoles?.Select(ur => ur.Role);, but you still this doesn't makes sense to have in this entity model? Are you saying that all entity models should have their own DTO, even if they are identical?
    – Algorythm
    Nov 20 '18 at 20:34










  • Indeed. And they are not identical. With DTOs/ViewModels you have full control over how the data looks and what is serialized. For instance, the bidirectional entity models (with navigation properties at both side of the relationship) lead to circular problems during JSON serialization. Or unexpected lazy loading (when enabled) at the time it is not expected. Etc. Not to mention the L2E query issues (client evaluation, NRE etc.)
    – Ivan Stoev
    Nov 20 '18 at 20:39




















  • Don't trust online articles. Messing up your entity model with not mapped properties which look like navigation properties is confusing and error prone (you can easily try to use them inside the LINQ to Entities query and get surprised). For easier accessibility and for a prettier JSON output, create special classes (a.k.a DTO, ViewModel etc.) and use projection (Select) or library like AutoMapper to map the data to/from the entity model.
    – Ivan Stoev
    Nov 20 '18 at 20:23












  • @IvanStoev I fixed it with: public virtual IEnumerable<Role> Roles => UserRoles?.Select(ur => ur.Role);, but you still this doesn't makes sense to have in this entity model? Are you saying that all entity models should have their own DTO, even if they are identical?
    – Algorythm
    Nov 20 '18 at 20:34










  • Indeed. And they are not identical. With DTOs/ViewModels you have full control over how the data looks and what is serialized. For instance, the bidirectional entity models (with navigation properties at both side of the relationship) lead to circular problems during JSON serialization. Or unexpected lazy loading (when enabled) at the time it is not expected. Etc. Not to mention the L2E query issues (client evaluation, NRE etc.)
    – Ivan Stoev
    Nov 20 '18 at 20:39


















Don't trust online articles. Messing up your entity model with not mapped properties which look like navigation properties is confusing and error prone (you can easily try to use them inside the LINQ to Entities query and get surprised). For easier accessibility and for a prettier JSON output, create special classes (a.k.a DTO, ViewModel etc.) and use projection (Select) or library like AutoMapper to map the data to/from the entity model.
– Ivan Stoev
Nov 20 '18 at 20:23






Don't trust online articles. Messing up your entity model with not mapped properties which look like navigation properties is confusing and error prone (you can easily try to use them inside the LINQ to Entities query and get surprised). For easier accessibility and for a prettier JSON output, create special classes (a.k.a DTO, ViewModel etc.) and use projection (Select) or library like AutoMapper to map the data to/from the entity model.
– Ivan Stoev
Nov 20 '18 at 20:23














@IvanStoev I fixed it with: public virtual IEnumerable<Role> Roles => UserRoles?.Select(ur => ur.Role);, but you still this doesn't makes sense to have in this entity model? Are you saying that all entity models should have their own DTO, even if they are identical?
– Algorythm
Nov 20 '18 at 20:34




@IvanStoev I fixed it with: public virtual IEnumerable<Role> Roles => UserRoles?.Select(ur => ur.Role);, but you still this doesn't makes sense to have in this entity model? Are you saying that all entity models should have their own DTO, even if they are identical?
– Algorythm
Nov 20 '18 at 20:34












Indeed. And they are not identical. With DTOs/ViewModels you have full control over how the data looks and what is serialized. For instance, the bidirectional entity models (with navigation properties at both side of the relationship) lead to circular problems during JSON serialization. Or unexpected lazy loading (when enabled) at the time it is not expected. Etc. Not to mention the L2E query issues (client evaluation, NRE etc.)
– Ivan Stoev
Nov 20 '18 at 20:39






Indeed. And they are not identical. With DTOs/ViewModels you have full control over how the data looks and what is serialized. For instance, the bidirectional entity models (with navigation properties at both side of the relationship) lead to circular problems during JSON serialization. Or unexpected lazy loading (when enabled) at the time it is not expected. Etc. Not to mention the L2E query issues (client evaluation, NRE etc.)
– Ivan Stoev
Nov 20 '18 at 20:39














2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0














Try this:



public virtual IEnumerable<Role> Roles => UserRoles?.Select(x => x.Role);





share|improve this answer





























    0














    I always do initialize any collection in empty constructor ( for EF ) and always call it from any other. As an example:



     public class User
    {
    public int Id { get; set; }
    public string UserName { get; set; }

    public virtual ICollection<UserRole> UserRoles { get; set; }

    public IEnumerable<Role> Roles => UserRoles.Select(x => x.Role);

    public User()
    {
    this.UserRoles = new List<UserRole>();
    }

    public User(string name)
    :this()
    {

    }
    }


    Whenever you will include the roles collection will be fill else you will always have empty collection so any operation wont fail.



    Also you do not neet [NotMapped] attribute since the property is readonly and EF will know that






    share|improve this answer





















      Your Answer






      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      });
      });
      }, "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "1"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53399953%2fef-core-many-to-many-hide-pivot%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      0














      Try this:



      public virtual IEnumerable<Role> Roles => UserRoles?.Select(x => x.Role);





      share|improve this answer


























        0














        Try this:



        public virtual IEnumerable<Role> Roles => UserRoles?.Select(x => x.Role);





        share|improve this answer
























          0












          0








          0






          Try this:



          public virtual IEnumerable<Role> Roles => UserRoles?.Select(x => x.Role);





          share|improve this answer












          Try this:



          public virtual IEnumerable<Role> Roles => UserRoles?.Select(x => x.Role);






          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 20 '18 at 19:15









          Dmitry S

          836617




          836617

























              0














              I always do initialize any collection in empty constructor ( for EF ) and always call it from any other. As an example:



               public class User
              {
              public int Id { get; set; }
              public string UserName { get; set; }

              public virtual ICollection<UserRole> UserRoles { get; set; }

              public IEnumerable<Role> Roles => UserRoles.Select(x => x.Role);

              public User()
              {
              this.UserRoles = new List<UserRole>();
              }

              public User(string name)
              :this()
              {

              }
              }


              Whenever you will include the roles collection will be fill else you will always have empty collection so any operation wont fail.



              Also you do not neet [NotMapped] attribute since the property is readonly and EF will know that






              share|improve this answer


























                0














                I always do initialize any collection in empty constructor ( for EF ) and always call it from any other. As an example:



                 public class User
                {
                public int Id { get; set; }
                public string UserName { get; set; }

                public virtual ICollection<UserRole> UserRoles { get; set; }

                public IEnumerable<Role> Roles => UserRoles.Select(x => x.Role);

                public User()
                {
                this.UserRoles = new List<UserRole>();
                }

                public User(string name)
                :this()
                {

                }
                }


                Whenever you will include the roles collection will be fill else you will always have empty collection so any operation wont fail.



                Also you do not neet [NotMapped] attribute since the property is readonly and EF will know that






                share|improve this answer
























                  0












                  0








                  0






                  I always do initialize any collection in empty constructor ( for EF ) and always call it from any other. As an example:



                   public class User
                  {
                  public int Id { get; set; }
                  public string UserName { get; set; }

                  public virtual ICollection<UserRole> UserRoles { get; set; }

                  public IEnumerable<Role> Roles => UserRoles.Select(x => x.Role);

                  public User()
                  {
                  this.UserRoles = new List<UserRole>();
                  }

                  public User(string name)
                  :this()
                  {

                  }
                  }


                  Whenever you will include the roles collection will be fill else you will always have empty collection so any operation wont fail.



                  Also you do not neet [NotMapped] attribute since the property is readonly and EF will know that






                  share|improve this answer












                  I always do initialize any collection in empty constructor ( for EF ) and always call it from any other. As an example:



                   public class User
                  {
                  public int Id { get; set; }
                  public string UserName { get; set; }

                  public virtual ICollection<UserRole> UserRoles { get; set; }

                  public IEnumerable<Role> Roles => UserRoles.Select(x => x.Role);

                  public User()
                  {
                  this.UserRoles = new List<UserRole>();
                  }

                  public User(string name)
                  :this()
                  {

                  }
                  }


                  Whenever you will include the roles collection will be fill else you will always have empty collection so any operation wont fail.



                  Also you do not neet [NotMapped] attribute since the property is readonly and EF will know that







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 20 '18 at 19:17









                  miechooy

                  1,09341837




                  1,09341837






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53399953%2fef-core-many-to-many-hide-pivot%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Costa Masnaga

                      Fotorealismo

                      Sidney Franklin