Using a siddur to Daven from in a seforim store












1















There are many seforim stores that have a minyan for Mincha in the store. If someone were to use a siddur from the store in order to daven with that minyan in a way that there's no perceived damage on the siddur, and nowhere is there a written policy to not use the siddurim for Mincha purposes.




  1. Can a siddur be used Lechatchila?


  2. Can the owner compel him to buy it now?







halacha money choshen-mishpat-civil-law torts-damages







share|improve this question




















  • 3





    If the owner allows it, what's the question? And if the owner doesn't allow it, what's the question?

    – Double AA♦
    4 hours ago











  • @DoubleAA it about where his attitude is unknown

    – Al Berko
    3 hours ago











  • Do you specifically mean for a Mitzvah or using just about anything, like coming toa tool store to fix your things.

    – Al Berko
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    Dude. I asked a serious straightforward question that actually happened to me today. And your just editing it to your own question, and then asking me questions on your question. Next time don't edit my question. It was a legitimate question. @AlBerko

    – Moshe
    3 hours ago











  • Here's a problem, you seek a simple answer to a complicated question, and you don't even understand its depth. This is not "ask a rabbi" site, and not facebook to call me dude. So if you seek some respect - please respect the site and its users.

    – Al Berko
    3 hours ago
















1















There are many seforim stores that have a minyan for Mincha in the store. If someone were to use a siddur from the store in order to daven with that minyan in a way that there's no perceived damage on the siddur, and nowhere is there a written policy to not use the siddurim for Mincha purposes.




  1. Can a siddur be used Lechatchila?


  2. Can the owner compel him to buy it now?







halacha money choshen-mishpat-civil-law torts-damages







share|improve this question




















  • 3





    If the owner allows it, what's the question? And if the owner doesn't allow it, what's the question?

    – Double AA♦
    4 hours ago











  • @DoubleAA it about where his attitude is unknown

    – Al Berko
    3 hours ago











  • Do you specifically mean for a Mitzvah or using just about anything, like coming toa tool store to fix your things.

    – Al Berko
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    Dude. I asked a serious straightforward question that actually happened to me today. And your just editing it to your own question, and then asking me questions on your question. Next time don't edit my question. It was a legitimate question. @AlBerko

    – Moshe
    3 hours ago











  • Here's a problem, you seek a simple answer to a complicated question, and you don't even understand its depth. This is not "ask a rabbi" site, and not facebook to call me dude. So if you seek some respect - please respect the site and its users.

    – Al Berko
    3 hours ago














1












1








1








There are many seforim stores that have a minyan for Mincha in the store. If someone were to use a siddur from the store in order to daven with that minyan in a way that there's no perceived damage on the siddur, and nowhere is there a written policy to not use the siddurim for Mincha purposes.




  1. Can a siddur be used Lechatchila?


  2. Can the owner compel him to buy it now?







halacha money choshen-mishpat-civil-law torts-damages







share|improve this question
















There are many seforim stores that have a minyan for Mincha in the store. If someone were to use a siddur from the store in order to daven with that minyan in a way that there's no perceived damage on the siddur, and nowhere is there a written policy to not use the siddurim for Mincha purposes.




  1. Can a siddur be used Lechatchila?


  2. Can the owner compel him to buy it now?







halacha money choshen-mishpat-civil-law torts-damages




halacha money choshen-mishpat-civil-law torts-damages






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago









Al Berko

6,2581529




6,2581529










asked 7 hours ago









MosheMoshe

45512




45512








  • 3





    If the owner allows it, what's the question? And if the owner doesn't allow it, what's the question?

    – Double AA♦
    4 hours ago











  • @DoubleAA it about where his attitude is unknown

    – Al Berko
    3 hours ago











  • Do you specifically mean for a Mitzvah or using just about anything, like coming toa tool store to fix your things.

    – Al Berko
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    Dude. I asked a serious straightforward question that actually happened to me today. And your just editing it to your own question, and then asking me questions on your question. Next time don't edit my question. It was a legitimate question. @AlBerko

    – Moshe
    3 hours ago











  • Here's a problem, you seek a simple answer to a complicated question, and you don't even understand its depth. This is not "ask a rabbi" site, and not facebook to call me dude. So if you seek some respect - please respect the site and its users.

    – Al Berko
    3 hours ago














  • 3





    If the owner allows it, what's the question? And if the owner doesn't allow it, what's the question?

    – Double AA♦
    4 hours ago











  • @DoubleAA it about where his attitude is unknown

    – Al Berko
    3 hours ago











  • Do you specifically mean for a Mitzvah or using just about anything, like coming toa tool store to fix your things.

    – Al Berko
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    Dude. I asked a serious straightforward question that actually happened to me today. And your just editing it to your own question, and then asking me questions on your question. Next time don't edit my question. It was a legitimate question. @AlBerko

    – Moshe
    3 hours ago











  • Here's a problem, you seek a simple answer to a complicated question, and you don't even understand its depth. This is not "ask a rabbi" site, and not facebook to call me dude. So if you seek some respect - please respect the site and its users.

    – Al Berko
    3 hours ago








3




3





If the owner allows it, what's the question? And if the owner doesn't allow it, what's the question?

– Double AA♦
4 hours ago





If the owner allows it, what's the question? And if the owner doesn't allow it, what's the question?

– Double AA♦
4 hours ago













@DoubleAA it about where his attitude is unknown

– Al Berko
3 hours ago





@DoubleAA it about where his attitude is unknown

– Al Berko
3 hours ago













Do you specifically mean for a Mitzvah or using just about anything, like coming toa tool store to fix your things.

– Al Berko
3 hours ago





Do you specifically mean for a Mitzvah or using just about anything, like coming toa tool store to fix your things.

– Al Berko
3 hours ago




1




1





Dude. I asked a serious straightforward question that actually happened to me today. And your just editing it to your own question, and then asking me questions on your question. Next time don't edit my question. It was a legitimate question. @AlBerko

– Moshe
3 hours ago





Dude. I asked a serious straightforward question that actually happened to me today. And your just editing it to your own question, and then asking me questions on your question. Next time don't edit my question. It was a legitimate question. @AlBerko

– Moshe
3 hours ago













Here's a problem, you seek a simple answer to a complicated question, and you don't even understand its depth. This is not "ask a rabbi" site, and not facebook to call me dude. So if you seek some respect - please respect the site and its users.

– Al Berko
3 hours ago





Here's a problem, you seek a simple answer to a complicated question, and you don't even understand its depth. This is not "ask a rabbi" site, and not facebook to call me dude. So if you seek some respect - please respect the site and its users.

– Al Berko
3 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5














No. One who borrows an item without permission from the owner is conidered a gazlan (שואל שלא מדעת גזלן), and like all cases of stealing, must return the item (והשיב את הגזילה אשר גזל). He is not required to purchase the item or to pay for the usage. If any damage was caused, however, he must pay the full value of the product, not just the amount the item depreciated through the damage.






share|improve this answer
























  • I would add two things - 1. The books ARE for sale and once someone raises them for his USE he acquires them 2. Your rule probably only applies to occasional use, but not repetitive. 3. It might also sound as Midas Sdom - depreciating value in small, under a Prutah steps - think about 10 Miniyanim every day.

    – Al Berko
    5 hours ago













  • @AlBerko 1. Not necessarily. Only if he takes it with the intention to acquire it; what if he takes it with the intention to use and return? He’s a שואל שלא מדעת then, as the answerer correctly states. 2. AFAIK there’s no limit to how often one can be a שואל שלא מדעת on the same item, just as there’s no limit to how often one acquired an item he repeatedly steals and returns. 3. is your only entirely valid point here, whether we can be כופה על מדת סדום, particularly in light of the Halacha that we presume people want others to do Mitzvos with their stuff.

    – DonielF
    4 hours ago











  • @DonielF Here's something I'm constantly stressing - everything depends on סמיכות דעת, i.g. דינא דמלכותא - whatever is accepted in that community/neighborhood/city/country. My points present clear cuts for such סמיכות דעת, for example, I remember my wife coming back from America in the 80s and wondering that you can return just about anything you buy, but in Israel, you can't. Samen here, 1 can be a consideration of distinguishing between a "try before you buy" and a real use.

    – Al Berko
    3 hours ago













  • @DonielF How about borrowing a hammer, a cordless driver or a stroller? #2 can also be a consideration for calling it a purchase. Think about one who tastes olives or nuts - once or twice is OK but 5-10 times cannot be called "tasting"

    – Al Berko
    3 hours ago











  • @AlBerko 1. סמיכות דעת is exactly what I’m stressing as well: the buyer was never סומך דעת to buy the item. 2. In all of those cases, there’s significant damage that accrues over several uses, making the user not only a גזלן but also a מזיק. In the case under discussion, there’s no damage done. Certainly if he uses it enough that the pages tear or crease it would be an issue, but as it stands, it’s just a שואל שלא מדעת.

    – DonielF
    3 hours ago



















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5














No. One who borrows an item without permission from the owner is conidered a gazlan (שואל שלא מדעת גזלן), and like all cases of stealing, must return the item (והשיב את הגזילה אשר גזל). He is not required to purchase the item or to pay for the usage. If any damage was caused, however, he must pay the full value of the product, not just the amount the item depreciated through the damage.






share|improve this answer
























  • I would add two things - 1. The books ARE for sale and once someone raises them for his USE he acquires them 2. Your rule probably only applies to occasional use, but not repetitive. 3. It might also sound as Midas Sdom - depreciating value in small, under a Prutah steps - think about 10 Miniyanim every day.

    – Al Berko
    5 hours ago













  • @AlBerko 1. Not necessarily. Only if he takes it with the intention to acquire it; what if he takes it with the intention to use and return? He’s a שואל שלא מדעת then, as the answerer correctly states. 2. AFAIK there’s no limit to how often one can be a שואל שלא מדעת on the same item, just as there’s no limit to how often one acquired an item he repeatedly steals and returns. 3. is your only entirely valid point here, whether we can be כופה על מדת סדום, particularly in light of the Halacha that we presume people want others to do Mitzvos with their stuff.

    – DonielF
    4 hours ago











  • @DonielF Here's something I'm constantly stressing - everything depends on סמיכות דעת, i.g. דינא דמלכותא - whatever is accepted in that community/neighborhood/city/country. My points present clear cuts for such סמיכות דעת, for example, I remember my wife coming back from America in the 80s and wondering that you can return just about anything you buy, but in Israel, you can't. Samen here, 1 can be a consideration of distinguishing between a "try before you buy" and a real use.

    – Al Berko
    3 hours ago













  • @DonielF How about borrowing a hammer, a cordless driver or a stroller? #2 can also be a consideration for calling it a purchase. Think about one who tastes olives or nuts - once or twice is OK but 5-10 times cannot be called "tasting"

    – Al Berko
    3 hours ago











  • @AlBerko 1. סמיכות דעת is exactly what I’m stressing as well: the buyer was never סומך דעת to buy the item. 2. In all of those cases, there’s significant damage that accrues over several uses, making the user not only a גזלן but also a מזיק. In the case under discussion, there’s no damage done. Certainly if he uses it enough that the pages tear or crease it would be an issue, but as it stands, it’s just a שואל שלא מדעת.

    – DonielF
    3 hours ago
















5














No. One who borrows an item without permission from the owner is conidered a gazlan (שואל שלא מדעת גזלן), and like all cases of stealing, must return the item (והשיב את הגזילה אשר גזל). He is not required to purchase the item or to pay for the usage. If any damage was caused, however, he must pay the full value of the product, not just the amount the item depreciated through the damage.






share|improve this answer
























  • I would add two things - 1. The books ARE for sale and once someone raises them for his USE he acquires them 2. Your rule probably only applies to occasional use, but not repetitive. 3. It might also sound as Midas Sdom - depreciating value in small, under a Prutah steps - think about 10 Miniyanim every day.

    – Al Berko
    5 hours ago













  • @AlBerko 1. Not necessarily. Only if he takes it with the intention to acquire it; what if he takes it with the intention to use and return? He’s a שואל שלא מדעת then, as the answerer correctly states. 2. AFAIK there’s no limit to how often one can be a שואל שלא מדעת on the same item, just as there’s no limit to how often one acquired an item he repeatedly steals and returns. 3. is your only entirely valid point here, whether we can be כופה על מדת סדום, particularly in light of the Halacha that we presume people want others to do Mitzvos with their stuff.

    – DonielF
    4 hours ago











  • @DonielF Here's something I'm constantly stressing - everything depends on סמיכות דעת, i.g. דינא דמלכותא - whatever is accepted in that community/neighborhood/city/country. My points present clear cuts for such סמיכות דעת, for example, I remember my wife coming back from America in the 80s and wondering that you can return just about anything you buy, but in Israel, you can't. Samen here, 1 can be a consideration of distinguishing between a "try before you buy" and a real use.

    – Al Berko
    3 hours ago













  • @DonielF How about borrowing a hammer, a cordless driver or a stroller? #2 can also be a consideration for calling it a purchase. Think about one who tastes olives or nuts - once or twice is OK but 5-10 times cannot be called "tasting"

    – Al Berko
    3 hours ago











  • @AlBerko 1. סמיכות דעת is exactly what I’m stressing as well: the buyer was never סומך דעת to buy the item. 2. In all of those cases, there’s significant damage that accrues over several uses, making the user not only a גזלן but also a מזיק. In the case under discussion, there’s no damage done. Certainly if he uses it enough that the pages tear or crease it would be an issue, but as it stands, it’s just a שואל שלא מדעת.

    – DonielF
    3 hours ago














5












5








5







No. One who borrows an item without permission from the owner is conidered a gazlan (שואל שלא מדעת גזלן), and like all cases of stealing, must return the item (והשיב את הגזילה אשר גזל). He is not required to purchase the item or to pay for the usage. If any damage was caused, however, he must pay the full value of the product, not just the amount the item depreciated through the damage.






share|improve this answer













No. One who borrows an item without permission from the owner is conidered a gazlan (שואל שלא מדעת גזלן), and like all cases of stealing, must return the item (והשיב את הגזילה אשר גזל). He is not required to purchase the item or to pay for the usage. If any damage was caused, however, he must pay the full value of the product, not just the amount the item depreciated through the damage.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 6 hours ago









chortkov2chortkov2

98417




98417













  • I would add two things - 1. The books ARE for sale and once someone raises them for his USE he acquires them 2. Your rule probably only applies to occasional use, but not repetitive. 3. It might also sound as Midas Sdom - depreciating value in small, under a Prutah steps - think about 10 Miniyanim every day.

    – Al Berko
    5 hours ago













  • @AlBerko 1. Not necessarily. Only if he takes it with the intention to acquire it; what if he takes it with the intention to use and return? He’s a שואל שלא מדעת then, as the answerer correctly states. 2. AFAIK there’s no limit to how often one can be a שואל שלא מדעת on the same item, just as there’s no limit to how often one acquired an item he repeatedly steals and returns. 3. is your only entirely valid point here, whether we can be כופה על מדת סדום, particularly in light of the Halacha that we presume people want others to do Mitzvos with their stuff.

    – DonielF
    4 hours ago











  • @DonielF Here's something I'm constantly stressing - everything depends on סמיכות דעת, i.g. דינא דמלכותא - whatever is accepted in that community/neighborhood/city/country. My points present clear cuts for such סמיכות דעת, for example, I remember my wife coming back from America in the 80s and wondering that you can return just about anything you buy, but in Israel, you can't. Samen here, 1 can be a consideration of distinguishing between a "try before you buy" and a real use.

    – Al Berko
    3 hours ago













  • @DonielF How about borrowing a hammer, a cordless driver or a stroller? #2 can also be a consideration for calling it a purchase. Think about one who tastes olives or nuts - once or twice is OK but 5-10 times cannot be called "tasting"

    – Al Berko
    3 hours ago











  • @AlBerko 1. סמיכות דעת is exactly what I’m stressing as well: the buyer was never סומך דעת to buy the item. 2. In all of those cases, there’s significant damage that accrues over several uses, making the user not only a גזלן but also a מזיק. In the case under discussion, there’s no damage done. Certainly if he uses it enough that the pages tear or crease it would be an issue, but as it stands, it’s just a שואל שלא מדעת.

    – DonielF
    3 hours ago



















  • I would add two things - 1. The books ARE for sale and once someone raises them for his USE he acquires them 2. Your rule probably only applies to occasional use, but not repetitive. 3. It might also sound as Midas Sdom - depreciating value in small, under a Prutah steps - think about 10 Miniyanim every day.

    – Al Berko
    5 hours ago













  • @AlBerko 1. Not necessarily. Only if he takes it with the intention to acquire it; what if he takes it with the intention to use and return? He’s a שואל שלא מדעת then, as the answerer correctly states. 2. AFAIK there’s no limit to how often one can be a שואל שלא מדעת on the same item, just as there’s no limit to how often one acquired an item he repeatedly steals and returns. 3. is your only entirely valid point here, whether we can be כופה על מדת סדום, particularly in light of the Halacha that we presume people want others to do Mitzvos with their stuff.

    – DonielF
    4 hours ago











  • @DonielF Here's something I'm constantly stressing - everything depends on סמיכות דעת, i.g. דינא דמלכותא - whatever is accepted in that community/neighborhood/city/country. My points present clear cuts for such סמיכות דעת, for example, I remember my wife coming back from America in the 80s and wondering that you can return just about anything you buy, but in Israel, you can't. Samen here, 1 can be a consideration of distinguishing between a "try before you buy" and a real use.

    – Al Berko
    3 hours ago













  • @DonielF How about borrowing a hammer, a cordless driver or a stroller? #2 can also be a consideration for calling it a purchase. Think about one who tastes olives or nuts - once or twice is OK but 5-10 times cannot be called "tasting"

    – Al Berko
    3 hours ago











  • @AlBerko 1. סמיכות דעת is exactly what I’m stressing as well: the buyer was never סומך דעת to buy the item. 2. In all of those cases, there’s significant damage that accrues over several uses, making the user not only a גזלן but also a מזיק. In the case under discussion, there’s no damage done. Certainly if he uses it enough that the pages tear or crease it would be an issue, but as it stands, it’s just a שואל שלא מדעת.

    – DonielF
    3 hours ago

















I would add two things - 1. The books ARE for sale and once someone raises them for his USE he acquires them 2. Your rule probably only applies to occasional use, but not repetitive. 3. It might also sound as Midas Sdom - depreciating value in small, under a Prutah steps - think about 10 Miniyanim every day.

– Al Berko
5 hours ago







I would add two things - 1. The books ARE for sale and once someone raises them for his USE he acquires them 2. Your rule probably only applies to occasional use, but not repetitive. 3. It might also sound as Midas Sdom - depreciating value in small, under a Prutah steps - think about 10 Miniyanim every day.

– Al Berko
5 hours ago















@AlBerko 1. Not necessarily. Only if he takes it with the intention to acquire it; what if he takes it with the intention to use and return? He’s a שואל שלא מדעת then, as the answerer correctly states. 2. AFAIK there’s no limit to how often one can be a שואל שלא מדעת on the same item, just as there’s no limit to how often one acquired an item he repeatedly steals and returns. 3. is your only entirely valid point here, whether we can be כופה על מדת סדום, particularly in light of the Halacha that we presume people want others to do Mitzvos with their stuff.

– DonielF
4 hours ago





@AlBerko 1. Not necessarily. Only if he takes it with the intention to acquire it; what if he takes it with the intention to use and return? He’s a שואל שלא מדעת then, as the answerer correctly states. 2. AFAIK there’s no limit to how often one can be a שואל שלא מדעת on the same item, just as there’s no limit to how often one acquired an item he repeatedly steals and returns. 3. is your only entirely valid point here, whether we can be כופה על מדת סדום, particularly in light of the Halacha that we presume people want others to do Mitzvos with their stuff.

– DonielF
4 hours ago













@DonielF Here's something I'm constantly stressing - everything depends on סמיכות דעת, i.g. דינא דמלכותא - whatever is accepted in that community/neighborhood/city/country. My points present clear cuts for such סמיכות דעת, for example, I remember my wife coming back from America in the 80s and wondering that you can return just about anything you buy, but in Israel, you can't. Samen here, 1 can be a consideration of distinguishing between a "try before you buy" and a real use.

– Al Berko
3 hours ago







@DonielF Here's something I'm constantly stressing - everything depends on סמיכות דעת, i.g. דינא דמלכותא - whatever is accepted in that community/neighborhood/city/country. My points present clear cuts for such סמיכות דעת, for example, I remember my wife coming back from America in the 80s and wondering that you can return just about anything you buy, but in Israel, you can't. Samen here, 1 can be a consideration of distinguishing between a "try before you buy" and a real use.

– Al Berko
3 hours ago















@DonielF How about borrowing a hammer, a cordless driver or a stroller? #2 can also be a consideration for calling it a purchase. Think about one who tastes olives or nuts - once or twice is OK but 5-10 times cannot be called "tasting"

– Al Berko
3 hours ago





@DonielF How about borrowing a hammer, a cordless driver or a stroller? #2 can also be a consideration for calling it a purchase. Think about one who tastes olives or nuts - once or twice is OK but 5-10 times cannot be called "tasting"

– Al Berko
3 hours ago













@AlBerko 1. סמיכות דעת is exactly what I’m stressing as well: the buyer was never סומך דעת to buy the item. 2. In all of those cases, there’s significant damage that accrues over several uses, making the user not only a גזלן but also a מזיק. In the case under discussion, there’s no damage done. Certainly if he uses it enough that the pages tear or crease it would be an issue, but as it stands, it’s just a שואל שלא מדעת.

– DonielF
3 hours ago





@AlBerko 1. סמיכות דעת is exactly what I’m stressing as well: the buyer was never סומך דעת to buy the item. 2. In all of those cases, there’s significant damage that accrues over several uses, making the user not only a גזלן but also a מזיק. In the case under discussion, there’s no damage done. Certainly if he uses it enough that the pages tear or crease it would be an issue, but as it stands, it’s just a שואל שלא מדעת.

– DonielF
3 hours ago



-

Popular posts from this blog

Costa Masnaga

Image
.mw-parser-output .avviso .mbox-text-div>div,.mw-parser-output .avviso .mbox-text-full-div>div{font-size:90%}.mw-parser-output .avviso .mbox-image div{width:52px}.mw-parser-output .avviso .mbox-text-full-div .hide-when-compact{display:block} Questa voce o sezione sull'argomento Lombardia non cita le fonti necessarie o quelle presenti sono insufficienti . Puoi migliorare questa voce aggiungendo citazioni da fonti attendibili secondo le linee guida sull'uso delle fonti. Segui i suggerimenti del progetto di riferimento. Costa Masnaga comune Localizzazione Stato   Italia Regione Lombardia Provincia Lecco Amministrazione Sindaco Sabina Panzeri (Al centro il cittadino) dall'08/06/2009 Territorio Coordinate 45°46′N 9°17′E  /  45.766667°N 9.283333°E 45.766667; 9.283333  ( Costa Masnaga ) Coordinate: 45°46′N 9°17′E  /  45.766667°N 9.283333°E 45.766667; 9.283333  ( Costa Masnaga ) Altitudine 318 m s.l.m...
Read more

Fotorealismo

Image
Guerrino Boatto, Venice's St. Barnaba Church and canal Il fotorealismo è un genere di pittura basato sull'uso di una o più fotografie dalle quali l'artista prende le informazioni necessarie da utilizzare poi nel processo della creazione dell'opera, in genere ad olio o ad acrilico, al fine di avere un aspetto finale il più simile possibile alla fotografia. Indice 1 Storia 2 Lista dei fotorealisti 3 Note 4 Voci correlate 5 Altri progetti Storia | Il fotorealismo è un movimento che nasce negli Stati Uniti d'America alla fine degli anni sessanta [1] sulla scia della Pop Art [2] [3] [4] , e insieme condividono il carattere reazionario verso la travolgente ascesa dei media, che alla metà del ventesimo secolo si trasforma in un fenomeno di massa talmente imponente da minacciare il valore dell'immagine nell'arte. [5] [6] Ne consegue così che, colto il gesto d'inizio che fu della Pop Art, i fotorealisti aprono ad un ...
Read more

Sidney Franklin

Image
Questa voce sull'argomento registi statunitensi è solo un abbozzo . Contribuisci a migliorarla secondo le convenzioni di Wikipedia. Sidney Franklin, foto di Carl Van Vechten Oscar alla memoria Irving G. Thalberg 1943 Sidney Franklin , all'anagrafe Sidney Arnold Franklin , (San Francisco, 21 marzo 1893 – Santa Monica, 18 maggio 1972), è stato un regista, produttore cinematografico e attore statunitense. Il 20 giugno 1963, si sposò con l'attrice australiana Enid Bennett. Il matrimonio durò fino alla morte dell'attrice, il 14 maggio 1969 [1] Indice 1 Filmografia 1.1 Regista 1.2 Aiuto regia (parziale) 1.3 Produttore 1.4 Attore (parziale) 2 Note 3 Altri progetti 4 Collegamenti esterni Filmografia | Regista | The Baby , co-regia Chester M. Franklin (1915) The Rivals , co-regia Chester M. Franklin (1915) Little Dick's First Case , co-regia Chester M. Franklin (1915) Her Filmland Hero , co-...
Read more