Why is wombat excreta shaped like cubes?
up vote
14
down vote
favorite
I've heard that wombat excreta is cube shaped, but I don't understand how that can happen. Has anyone studied the phenomenon? What would the evolutionary pressure have been to cause this?
zoology physiology ethology mammals digestion
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
14
down vote
favorite
I've heard that wombat excreta is cube shaped, but I don't understand how that can happen. Has anyone studied the phenomenon? What would the evolutionary pressure have been to cause this?
zoology physiology ethology mammals digestion
4
Square bumhole.
– Robert Frost
yesterday
@RobertFrost I assume (as you mention in your answer below) that your comment is not serious, but for the sake of others I'll just mention that a square bumhole is definitively not the reason.
– theforestecologist
16 hours ago
@theforestecologist it instantly sprung to mind as the obvious answer, and made me chuckle so I thought I would share. Just the infantile way my mind works I guess.
– Robert Frost
15 hours ago
Downvote for asking a question that has been all over the news recently, such as here theguardian.com/science/2018/nov/18/…
– CrossRoads
15 hours ago
1
Why does that matter? Does Biology.SE have a rule about asking questions that are spurred by the news? Also, it's disingenuous to call The Guardian news...
– Adonalsium
13 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
14
down vote
favorite
up vote
14
down vote
favorite
I've heard that wombat excreta is cube shaped, but I don't understand how that can happen. Has anyone studied the phenomenon? What would the evolutionary pressure have been to cause this?
zoology physiology ethology mammals digestion
I've heard that wombat excreta is cube shaped, but I don't understand how that can happen. Has anyone studied the phenomenon? What would the evolutionary pressure have been to cause this?
zoology physiology ethology mammals digestion
zoology physiology ethology mammals digestion
edited yesterday
David
11.3k41746
11.3k41746
asked yesterday
ASimonis
32619
32619
4
Square bumhole.
– Robert Frost
yesterday
@RobertFrost I assume (as you mention in your answer below) that your comment is not serious, but for the sake of others I'll just mention that a square bumhole is definitively not the reason.
– theforestecologist
16 hours ago
@theforestecologist it instantly sprung to mind as the obvious answer, and made me chuckle so I thought I would share. Just the infantile way my mind works I guess.
– Robert Frost
15 hours ago
Downvote for asking a question that has been all over the news recently, such as here theguardian.com/science/2018/nov/18/…
– CrossRoads
15 hours ago
1
Why does that matter? Does Biology.SE have a rule about asking questions that are spurred by the news? Also, it's disingenuous to call The Guardian news...
– Adonalsium
13 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
4
Square bumhole.
– Robert Frost
yesterday
@RobertFrost I assume (as you mention in your answer below) that your comment is not serious, but for the sake of others I'll just mention that a square bumhole is definitively not the reason.
– theforestecologist
16 hours ago
@theforestecologist it instantly sprung to mind as the obvious answer, and made me chuckle so I thought I would share. Just the infantile way my mind works I guess.
– Robert Frost
15 hours ago
Downvote for asking a question that has been all over the news recently, such as here theguardian.com/science/2018/nov/18/…
– CrossRoads
15 hours ago
1
Why does that matter? Does Biology.SE have a rule about asking questions that are spurred by the news? Also, it's disingenuous to call The Guardian news...
– Adonalsium
13 hours ago
4
4
Square bumhole.
– Robert Frost
yesterday
Square bumhole.
– Robert Frost
yesterday
@RobertFrost I assume (as you mention in your answer below) that your comment is not serious, but for the sake of others I'll just mention that a square bumhole is definitively not the reason.
– theforestecologist
16 hours ago
@RobertFrost I assume (as you mention in your answer below) that your comment is not serious, but for the sake of others I'll just mention that a square bumhole is definitively not the reason.
– theforestecologist
16 hours ago
@theforestecologist it instantly sprung to mind as the obvious answer, and made me chuckle so I thought I would share. Just the infantile way my mind works I guess.
– Robert Frost
15 hours ago
@theforestecologist it instantly sprung to mind as the obvious answer, and made me chuckle so I thought I would share. Just the infantile way my mind works I guess.
– Robert Frost
15 hours ago
Downvote for asking a question that has been all over the news recently, such as here theguardian.com/science/2018/nov/18/…
– CrossRoads
15 hours ago
Downvote for asking a question that has been all over the news recently, such as here theguardian.com/science/2018/nov/18/…
– CrossRoads
15 hours ago
1
1
Why does that matter? Does Biology.SE have a rule about asking questions that are spurred by the news? Also, it's disingenuous to call The Guardian news...
– Adonalsium
13 hours ago
Why does that matter? Does Biology.SE have a rule about asking questions that are spurred by the news? Also, it's disingenuous to call The Guardian news...
– Adonalsium
13 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
20
down vote
I'm almost certain that your question is based on the press that Patricia J Yang's research is receiving (e.g., here and here).
Yang and her co-authors examined the structure and mechanics of some dead wombats to investigate this question further. They found that varying degrees of pressure in the latter portion of the wombat's intestines (in conjunction with a dehydrating of the fecal matter) led to the characteristic cube shape:
From their abstract:
In the final 8 percent of the intestine, feces changed from a liquid-like state into a solid state composed of separated cubes of length 2 cm. This shape change was due to the azimuthally varying elastic properties of the intestinal wall. By emptying the intestine and inflating it with a long balloon, we found that the local strain varies from 20 percent at the cube's corners to 75 percent at its edges. Thus, the intestine stretches preferentially at the walls to facilitate cube formation.
Why do this?
There seems to be two major reasons:
- Mark territory
- Attract mates
For example, see Wells 19891:
The rubbing of posts, logs and overhanging branches with their backs and rumps and deposition of faeces along trails may be a means of olfactory communication used in the maintenance of territories
One hypothesis is that by being square, the droppings don't roll as easily and therefore stay in the place that the wombat intended to mark.
I've also seen hypotheses about wombats stacking their square feces as some sort of signaling, but I couldn't find any reputable literature sources that make this suggestion.
1: Wells, R.T., 1989. Vombatidae. Fauna of Australia, 1, pp.755-768.
1
The "Why do this?" part doesn't really explain why. Plenty of other creatures mark territory and attract mates, and they don't have square poops. Similarly the Wells quote seems unrelated.
– Parrotmaster
14 hours ago
5
@Parrotmaster: As nature continually proves, multiple solutions to the same problem exist. Plenty of creatures are land-based animals but that doesn't prove that birds shouldn't have evolved to have wings. Recognizability of feces may not have been the reason for its inception (random mutations tend to be the reason for the inception of a trait), but the subsequent benefit of recognizability of the uniquely shaped droppings may explain why the trait persisted.
– Flater
13 hours ago
1
@Parrotmaster take a look at Wells's paper for number of citations regarding the ethology and social-ecology of wombats
– theforestecologist
13 hours ago
1
probably means there are 4 muscles around the intestine that form a square.
– gunfulker
8 hours ago
1
@GraphTheory, no. The intestine supposedly just squeezes differentially due to varying elastic properties of the intestinal wall.
– theforestecologist
7 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
7
down vote
On a more serious note than my comment, and as a supplement to theforestecologist's answer, it's worth pointing out that a cube with rounded corners and edges has larger surface area to volume ratio than a spherical dropping, making it more efficient for the reabsorbtion of moisture, which would be an evolutionary advantage in a place where water is in short supply (as it is in large parts Australia).
Additionally, in respect of the claim that droppings are used for marking, it may be advantageous to have a dropping that doesn't roll, if it's important some subsequent visitor can identify the precise spot the droppings were dropped, especially if one inhabits sloped terrain (which a wombat does - mountainous areas of Australia) where a round dropping might roll and mark an ambiguous spot.
2
Why would feces reabsorbing moisture be an advantage? Do wombats eat their droppings?
– Paul
16 hours ago
7
@Paul I guess he meant colon absorbing moisture from feces to conserve water.
– user31389
16 hours ago
9
@Paul a standard function of the colon in all animals is to reabsorb nutrients and fluid from doo doo before it's expelled.
– Robert Frost
15 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I just saw this report..
Scientists discover why wombat poop is cube-shaped
Hope it will give you the answer
https://www.cnet.com/news/scientists-discover-why-wombat-poop-is-cube-shaped/?ftag=COS-05-10-aaa0a&linkId=59915356
New contributor
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
20
down vote
I'm almost certain that your question is based on the press that Patricia J Yang's research is receiving (e.g., here and here).
Yang and her co-authors examined the structure and mechanics of some dead wombats to investigate this question further. They found that varying degrees of pressure in the latter portion of the wombat's intestines (in conjunction with a dehydrating of the fecal matter) led to the characteristic cube shape:
From their abstract:
In the final 8 percent of the intestine, feces changed from a liquid-like state into a solid state composed of separated cubes of length 2 cm. This shape change was due to the azimuthally varying elastic properties of the intestinal wall. By emptying the intestine and inflating it with a long balloon, we found that the local strain varies from 20 percent at the cube's corners to 75 percent at its edges. Thus, the intestine stretches preferentially at the walls to facilitate cube formation.
Why do this?
There seems to be two major reasons:
- Mark territory
- Attract mates
For example, see Wells 19891:
The rubbing of posts, logs and overhanging branches with their backs and rumps and deposition of faeces along trails may be a means of olfactory communication used in the maintenance of territories
One hypothesis is that by being square, the droppings don't roll as easily and therefore stay in the place that the wombat intended to mark.
I've also seen hypotheses about wombats stacking their square feces as some sort of signaling, but I couldn't find any reputable literature sources that make this suggestion.
1: Wells, R.T., 1989. Vombatidae. Fauna of Australia, 1, pp.755-768.
1
The "Why do this?" part doesn't really explain why. Plenty of other creatures mark territory and attract mates, and they don't have square poops. Similarly the Wells quote seems unrelated.
– Parrotmaster
14 hours ago
5
@Parrotmaster: As nature continually proves, multiple solutions to the same problem exist. Plenty of creatures are land-based animals but that doesn't prove that birds shouldn't have evolved to have wings. Recognizability of feces may not have been the reason for its inception (random mutations tend to be the reason for the inception of a trait), but the subsequent benefit of recognizability of the uniquely shaped droppings may explain why the trait persisted.
– Flater
13 hours ago
1
@Parrotmaster take a look at Wells's paper for number of citations regarding the ethology and social-ecology of wombats
– theforestecologist
13 hours ago
1
probably means there are 4 muscles around the intestine that form a square.
– gunfulker
8 hours ago
1
@GraphTheory, no. The intestine supposedly just squeezes differentially due to varying elastic properties of the intestinal wall.
– theforestecologist
7 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
20
down vote
I'm almost certain that your question is based on the press that Patricia J Yang's research is receiving (e.g., here and here).
Yang and her co-authors examined the structure and mechanics of some dead wombats to investigate this question further. They found that varying degrees of pressure in the latter portion of the wombat's intestines (in conjunction with a dehydrating of the fecal matter) led to the characteristic cube shape:
From their abstract:
In the final 8 percent of the intestine, feces changed from a liquid-like state into a solid state composed of separated cubes of length 2 cm. This shape change was due to the azimuthally varying elastic properties of the intestinal wall. By emptying the intestine and inflating it with a long balloon, we found that the local strain varies from 20 percent at the cube's corners to 75 percent at its edges. Thus, the intestine stretches preferentially at the walls to facilitate cube formation.
Why do this?
There seems to be two major reasons:
- Mark territory
- Attract mates
For example, see Wells 19891:
The rubbing of posts, logs and overhanging branches with their backs and rumps and deposition of faeces along trails may be a means of olfactory communication used in the maintenance of territories
One hypothesis is that by being square, the droppings don't roll as easily and therefore stay in the place that the wombat intended to mark.
I've also seen hypotheses about wombats stacking their square feces as some sort of signaling, but I couldn't find any reputable literature sources that make this suggestion.
1: Wells, R.T., 1989. Vombatidae. Fauna of Australia, 1, pp.755-768.
1
The "Why do this?" part doesn't really explain why. Plenty of other creatures mark territory and attract mates, and they don't have square poops. Similarly the Wells quote seems unrelated.
– Parrotmaster
14 hours ago
5
@Parrotmaster: As nature continually proves, multiple solutions to the same problem exist. Plenty of creatures are land-based animals but that doesn't prove that birds shouldn't have evolved to have wings. Recognizability of feces may not have been the reason for its inception (random mutations tend to be the reason for the inception of a trait), but the subsequent benefit of recognizability of the uniquely shaped droppings may explain why the trait persisted.
– Flater
13 hours ago
1
@Parrotmaster take a look at Wells's paper for number of citations regarding the ethology and social-ecology of wombats
– theforestecologist
13 hours ago
1
probably means there are 4 muscles around the intestine that form a square.
– gunfulker
8 hours ago
1
@GraphTheory, no. The intestine supposedly just squeezes differentially due to varying elastic properties of the intestinal wall.
– theforestecologist
7 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
20
down vote
up vote
20
down vote
I'm almost certain that your question is based on the press that Patricia J Yang's research is receiving (e.g., here and here).
Yang and her co-authors examined the structure and mechanics of some dead wombats to investigate this question further. They found that varying degrees of pressure in the latter portion of the wombat's intestines (in conjunction with a dehydrating of the fecal matter) led to the characteristic cube shape:
From their abstract:
In the final 8 percent of the intestine, feces changed from a liquid-like state into a solid state composed of separated cubes of length 2 cm. This shape change was due to the azimuthally varying elastic properties of the intestinal wall. By emptying the intestine and inflating it with a long balloon, we found that the local strain varies from 20 percent at the cube's corners to 75 percent at its edges. Thus, the intestine stretches preferentially at the walls to facilitate cube formation.
Why do this?
There seems to be two major reasons:
- Mark territory
- Attract mates
For example, see Wells 19891:
The rubbing of posts, logs and overhanging branches with their backs and rumps and deposition of faeces along trails may be a means of olfactory communication used in the maintenance of territories
One hypothesis is that by being square, the droppings don't roll as easily and therefore stay in the place that the wombat intended to mark.
I've also seen hypotheses about wombats stacking their square feces as some sort of signaling, but I couldn't find any reputable literature sources that make this suggestion.
1: Wells, R.T., 1989. Vombatidae. Fauna of Australia, 1, pp.755-768.
I'm almost certain that your question is based on the press that Patricia J Yang's research is receiving (e.g., here and here).
Yang and her co-authors examined the structure and mechanics of some dead wombats to investigate this question further. They found that varying degrees of pressure in the latter portion of the wombat's intestines (in conjunction with a dehydrating of the fecal matter) led to the characteristic cube shape:
From their abstract:
In the final 8 percent of the intestine, feces changed from a liquid-like state into a solid state composed of separated cubes of length 2 cm. This shape change was due to the azimuthally varying elastic properties of the intestinal wall. By emptying the intestine and inflating it with a long balloon, we found that the local strain varies from 20 percent at the cube's corners to 75 percent at its edges. Thus, the intestine stretches preferentially at the walls to facilitate cube formation.
Why do this?
There seems to be two major reasons:
- Mark territory
- Attract mates
For example, see Wells 19891:
The rubbing of posts, logs and overhanging branches with their backs and rumps and deposition of faeces along trails may be a means of olfactory communication used in the maintenance of territories
One hypothesis is that by being square, the droppings don't roll as easily and therefore stay in the place that the wombat intended to mark.
I've also seen hypotheses about wombats stacking their square feces as some sort of signaling, but I couldn't find any reputable literature sources that make this suggestion.
1: Wells, R.T., 1989. Vombatidae. Fauna of Australia, 1, pp.755-768.
edited 6 hours ago
answered yesterday
theforestecologist
15.2k670120
15.2k670120
1
The "Why do this?" part doesn't really explain why. Plenty of other creatures mark territory and attract mates, and they don't have square poops. Similarly the Wells quote seems unrelated.
– Parrotmaster
14 hours ago
5
@Parrotmaster: As nature continually proves, multiple solutions to the same problem exist. Plenty of creatures are land-based animals but that doesn't prove that birds shouldn't have evolved to have wings. Recognizability of feces may not have been the reason for its inception (random mutations tend to be the reason for the inception of a trait), but the subsequent benefit of recognizability of the uniquely shaped droppings may explain why the trait persisted.
– Flater
13 hours ago
1
@Parrotmaster take a look at Wells's paper for number of citations regarding the ethology and social-ecology of wombats
– theforestecologist
13 hours ago
1
probably means there are 4 muscles around the intestine that form a square.
– gunfulker
8 hours ago
1
@GraphTheory, no. The intestine supposedly just squeezes differentially due to varying elastic properties of the intestinal wall.
– theforestecologist
7 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
1
The "Why do this?" part doesn't really explain why. Plenty of other creatures mark territory and attract mates, and they don't have square poops. Similarly the Wells quote seems unrelated.
– Parrotmaster
14 hours ago
5
@Parrotmaster: As nature continually proves, multiple solutions to the same problem exist. Plenty of creatures are land-based animals but that doesn't prove that birds shouldn't have evolved to have wings. Recognizability of feces may not have been the reason for its inception (random mutations tend to be the reason for the inception of a trait), but the subsequent benefit of recognizability of the uniquely shaped droppings may explain why the trait persisted.
– Flater
13 hours ago
1
@Parrotmaster take a look at Wells's paper for number of citations regarding the ethology and social-ecology of wombats
– theforestecologist
13 hours ago
1
probably means there are 4 muscles around the intestine that form a square.
– gunfulker
8 hours ago
1
@GraphTheory, no. The intestine supposedly just squeezes differentially due to varying elastic properties of the intestinal wall.
– theforestecologist
7 hours ago
1
1
The "Why do this?" part doesn't really explain why. Plenty of other creatures mark territory and attract mates, and they don't have square poops. Similarly the Wells quote seems unrelated.
– Parrotmaster
14 hours ago
The "Why do this?" part doesn't really explain why. Plenty of other creatures mark territory and attract mates, and they don't have square poops. Similarly the Wells quote seems unrelated.
– Parrotmaster
14 hours ago
5
5
@Parrotmaster: As nature continually proves, multiple solutions to the same problem exist. Plenty of creatures are land-based animals but that doesn't prove that birds shouldn't have evolved to have wings. Recognizability of feces may not have been the reason for its inception (random mutations tend to be the reason for the inception of a trait), but the subsequent benefit of recognizability of the uniquely shaped droppings may explain why the trait persisted.
– Flater
13 hours ago
@Parrotmaster: As nature continually proves, multiple solutions to the same problem exist. Plenty of creatures are land-based animals but that doesn't prove that birds shouldn't have evolved to have wings. Recognizability of feces may not have been the reason for its inception (random mutations tend to be the reason for the inception of a trait), but the subsequent benefit of recognizability of the uniquely shaped droppings may explain why the trait persisted.
– Flater
13 hours ago
1
1
@Parrotmaster take a look at Wells's paper for number of citations regarding the ethology and social-ecology of wombats
– theforestecologist
13 hours ago
@Parrotmaster take a look at Wells's paper for number of citations regarding the ethology and social-ecology of wombats
– theforestecologist
13 hours ago
1
1
probably means there are 4 muscles around the intestine that form a square.
– gunfulker
8 hours ago
probably means there are 4 muscles around the intestine that form a square.
– gunfulker
8 hours ago
1
1
@GraphTheory, no. The intestine supposedly just squeezes differentially due to varying elastic properties of the intestinal wall.
– theforestecologist
7 hours ago
@GraphTheory, no. The intestine supposedly just squeezes differentially due to varying elastic properties of the intestinal wall.
– theforestecologist
7 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
7
down vote
On a more serious note than my comment, and as a supplement to theforestecologist's answer, it's worth pointing out that a cube with rounded corners and edges has larger surface area to volume ratio than a spherical dropping, making it more efficient for the reabsorbtion of moisture, which would be an evolutionary advantage in a place where water is in short supply (as it is in large parts Australia).
Additionally, in respect of the claim that droppings are used for marking, it may be advantageous to have a dropping that doesn't roll, if it's important some subsequent visitor can identify the precise spot the droppings were dropped, especially if one inhabits sloped terrain (which a wombat does - mountainous areas of Australia) where a round dropping might roll and mark an ambiguous spot.
2
Why would feces reabsorbing moisture be an advantage? Do wombats eat their droppings?
– Paul
16 hours ago
7
@Paul I guess he meant colon absorbing moisture from feces to conserve water.
– user31389
16 hours ago
9
@Paul a standard function of the colon in all animals is to reabsorb nutrients and fluid from doo doo before it's expelled.
– Robert Frost
15 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
On a more serious note than my comment, and as a supplement to theforestecologist's answer, it's worth pointing out that a cube with rounded corners and edges has larger surface area to volume ratio than a spherical dropping, making it more efficient for the reabsorbtion of moisture, which would be an evolutionary advantage in a place where water is in short supply (as it is in large parts Australia).
Additionally, in respect of the claim that droppings are used for marking, it may be advantageous to have a dropping that doesn't roll, if it's important some subsequent visitor can identify the precise spot the droppings were dropped, especially if one inhabits sloped terrain (which a wombat does - mountainous areas of Australia) where a round dropping might roll and mark an ambiguous spot.
2
Why would feces reabsorbing moisture be an advantage? Do wombats eat their droppings?
– Paul
16 hours ago
7
@Paul I guess he meant colon absorbing moisture from feces to conserve water.
– user31389
16 hours ago
9
@Paul a standard function of the colon in all animals is to reabsorb nutrients and fluid from doo doo before it's expelled.
– Robert Frost
15 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
up vote
7
down vote
On a more serious note than my comment, and as a supplement to theforestecologist's answer, it's worth pointing out that a cube with rounded corners and edges has larger surface area to volume ratio than a spherical dropping, making it more efficient for the reabsorbtion of moisture, which would be an evolutionary advantage in a place where water is in short supply (as it is in large parts Australia).
Additionally, in respect of the claim that droppings are used for marking, it may be advantageous to have a dropping that doesn't roll, if it's important some subsequent visitor can identify the precise spot the droppings were dropped, especially if one inhabits sloped terrain (which a wombat does - mountainous areas of Australia) where a round dropping might roll and mark an ambiguous spot.
On a more serious note than my comment, and as a supplement to theforestecologist's answer, it's worth pointing out that a cube with rounded corners and edges has larger surface area to volume ratio than a spherical dropping, making it more efficient for the reabsorbtion of moisture, which would be an evolutionary advantage in a place where water is in short supply (as it is in large parts Australia).
Additionally, in respect of the claim that droppings are used for marking, it may be advantageous to have a dropping that doesn't roll, if it's important some subsequent visitor can identify the precise spot the droppings were dropped, especially if one inhabits sloped terrain (which a wombat does - mountainous areas of Australia) where a round dropping might roll and mark an ambiguous spot.
answered 19 hours ago
Robert Frost
1713
1713
2
Why would feces reabsorbing moisture be an advantage? Do wombats eat their droppings?
– Paul
16 hours ago
7
@Paul I guess he meant colon absorbing moisture from feces to conserve water.
– user31389
16 hours ago
9
@Paul a standard function of the colon in all animals is to reabsorb nutrients and fluid from doo doo before it's expelled.
– Robert Frost
15 hours ago
add a comment |
2
Why would feces reabsorbing moisture be an advantage? Do wombats eat their droppings?
– Paul
16 hours ago
7
@Paul I guess he meant colon absorbing moisture from feces to conserve water.
– user31389
16 hours ago
9
@Paul a standard function of the colon in all animals is to reabsorb nutrients and fluid from doo doo before it's expelled.
– Robert Frost
15 hours ago
2
2
Why would feces reabsorbing moisture be an advantage? Do wombats eat their droppings?
– Paul
16 hours ago
Why would feces reabsorbing moisture be an advantage? Do wombats eat their droppings?
– Paul
16 hours ago
7
7
@Paul I guess he meant colon absorbing moisture from feces to conserve water.
– user31389
16 hours ago
@Paul I guess he meant colon absorbing moisture from feces to conserve water.
– user31389
16 hours ago
9
9
@Paul a standard function of the colon in all animals is to reabsorb nutrients and fluid from doo doo before it's expelled.
– Robert Frost
15 hours ago
@Paul a standard function of the colon in all animals is to reabsorb nutrients and fluid from doo doo before it's expelled.
– Robert Frost
15 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I just saw this report..
Scientists discover why wombat poop is cube-shaped
Hope it will give you the answer
https://www.cnet.com/news/scientists-discover-why-wombat-poop-is-cube-shaped/?ftag=COS-05-10-aaa0a&linkId=59915356
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I just saw this report..
Scientists discover why wombat poop is cube-shaped
Hope it will give you the answer
https://www.cnet.com/news/scientists-discover-why-wombat-poop-is-cube-shaped/?ftag=COS-05-10-aaa0a&linkId=59915356
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
I just saw this report..
Scientists discover why wombat poop is cube-shaped
Hope it will give you the answer
https://www.cnet.com/news/scientists-discover-why-wombat-poop-is-cube-shaped/?ftag=COS-05-10-aaa0a&linkId=59915356
New contributor
I just saw this report..
Scientists discover why wombat poop is cube-shaped
Hope it will give you the answer
https://www.cnet.com/news/scientists-discover-why-wombat-poop-is-cube-shaped/?ftag=COS-05-10-aaa0a&linkId=59915356
New contributor
New contributor
answered 3 hours ago
asmgx
1012
1012
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbiology.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f79162%2fwhy-is-wombat-excreta-shaped-like-cubes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
Square bumhole.
– Robert Frost
yesterday
@RobertFrost I assume (as you mention in your answer below) that your comment is not serious, but for the sake of others I'll just mention that a square bumhole is definitively not the reason.
– theforestecologist
16 hours ago
@theforestecologist it instantly sprung to mind as the obvious answer, and made me chuckle so I thought I would share. Just the infantile way my mind works I guess.
– Robert Frost
15 hours ago
Downvote for asking a question that has been all over the news recently, such as here theguardian.com/science/2018/nov/18/…
– CrossRoads
15 hours ago
1
Why does that matter? Does Biology.SE have a rule about asking questions that are spurred by the news? Also, it's disingenuous to call The Guardian news...
– Adonalsium
13 hours ago