How to properly align Tikz pictures in Latex fraction environment
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
How to properly align Tikz pictures in Latex environment to get the following picture?
My trial code does not compile,
documentclass[preview]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}
defL{1.0}
matrix[column sep=.1cm, row sep=2mm]
{
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
&
node at (0,0) {$-$};
&
draw[dashed] (0,0) -- (L,0);
draw[xshift=L cm] (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0); \
};
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}
end{document}
tikz-pgf amsmath fractions alignment
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
How to properly align Tikz pictures in Latex environment to get the following picture?
My trial code does not compile,
documentclass[preview]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}
defL{1.0}
matrix[column sep=.1cm, row sep=2mm]
{
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
&
node at (0,0) {$-$};
&
draw[dashed] (0,0) -- (L,0);
draw[xshift=L cm] (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0); \
};
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}
end{document}
tikz-pgf amsmath fractions alignment
please, extend your code fragment to complete small document ...
– Zarko
3 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
How to properly align Tikz pictures in Latex environment to get the following picture?
My trial code does not compile,
documentclass[preview]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}
defL{1.0}
matrix[column sep=.1cm, row sep=2mm]
{
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
&
node at (0,0) {$-$};
&
draw[dashed] (0,0) -- (L,0);
draw[xshift=L cm] (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0); \
};
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}
end{document}
tikz-pgf amsmath fractions alignment
How to properly align Tikz pictures in Latex environment to get the following picture?
My trial code does not compile,
documentclass[preview]{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}
defL{1.0}
matrix[column sep=.1cm, row sep=2mm]
{
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
&
node at (0,0) {$-$};
&
draw[dashed] (0,0) -- (L,0);
draw[xshift=L cm] (0,0) to[bend left] (L,0) to[bend left] (0,0); \
};
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}
end{document}
tikz-pgf amsmath fractions alignment
tikz-pgf amsmath fractions alignment
edited 42 mins ago
asked 3 hours ago
Kevin Powell
1556
1556
please, extend your code fragment to complete small document ...
– Zarko
3 hours ago
add a comment |
please, extend your code fragment to complete small document ...
– Zarko
3 hours ago
please, extend your code fragment to complete small document ...
– Zarko
3 hours ago
please, extend your code fragment to complete small document ...
– Zarko
3 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Generally you can control the vertical alignment with the baseline
option.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
-
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
draw[dashed](0,0) -- (-1,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}
end{document}
I don't know what these objects represent, so you may want to use another baseline.
Thanks! It seems that the more versatilematrix
intikzpicture
does not work withfrac
. Althoughbaseline
is one answer to this figure, it will become difficult to deal with multiple rows of figure in the denominator.
– Kevin Powell
16 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
[
defM{tikz{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0)
( 0.5,0) to[bend left] ( 1.5,0) to[bend left] ( 0.5,0);
draw[dashed] (-0.5,0) -- (0.5,0);}
}
A = frac{tikz[baseline=1pt]{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0);}}
{tikz{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0)
( 0.5,0) to[bend left] ( 1.5,0) to[bend left] ( 0.5,0);
draw[dashed, shorten >=1mm, shorten <=1mm] (-0.5,0) -- (0.5,0);}
}
]
end{document}
How is that different from my answer except that you defineM
but do not use it? The only thing apart from the unused definition I can see is the use ofbaseline
, which is precisely what I am using.
– marmot
2 hours ago
@marmot the denominator is different. I think there's an error here, because the minus is missing.
– CarLaTeX
2 hours ago
2
I would create apic
for the shapes, and suggest to use dots instead of dashes, which could be confused with the minus (@marmot, too).
– CarLaTeX
1 hour ago
@CarLaTeX That's a brilliant idea!
– Kevin Powell
20 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466042%2fhow-to-properly-align-tikz-pictures-in-latex-fraction-environment%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Generally you can control the vertical alignment with the baseline
option.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
-
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
draw[dashed](0,0) -- (-1,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}
end{document}
I don't know what these objects represent, so you may want to use another baseline.
Thanks! It seems that the more versatilematrix
intikzpicture
does not work withfrac
. Althoughbaseline
is one answer to this figure, it will become difficult to deal with multiple rows of figure in the denominator.
– Kevin Powell
16 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Generally you can control the vertical alignment with the baseline
option.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
-
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
draw[dashed](0,0) -- (-1,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}
end{document}
I don't know what these objects represent, so you may want to use another baseline.
Thanks! It seems that the more versatilematrix
intikzpicture
does not work withfrac
. Althoughbaseline
is one answer to this figure, it will become difficult to deal with multiple rows of figure in the denominator.
– Kevin Powell
16 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Generally you can control the vertical alignment with the baseline
option.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
-
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
draw[dashed](0,0) -- (-1,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}
end{document}
I don't know what these objects represent, so you may want to use another baseline.
Generally you can control the vertical alignment with the baseline
option.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{equation*}
A = frac{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}{%
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
end{tikzpicture}
-
begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,-0.1)}]
draw (0,0) to[bend left] (1,0) to[bend left] (0,0);
draw[dashed](0,0) -- (-1,0);
end{tikzpicture}
}
end{equation*}
end{document}
I don't know what these objects represent, so you may want to use another baseline.
edited 2 hours ago
answered 3 hours ago
marmot
83.4k493178
83.4k493178
Thanks! It seems that the more versatilematrix
intikzpicture
does not work withfrac
. Althoughbaseline
is one answer to this figure, it will become difficult to deal with multiple rows of figure in the denominator.
– Kevin Powell
16 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks! It seems that the more versatilematrix
intikzpicture
does not work withfrac
. Althoughbaseline
is one answer to this figure, it will become difficult to deal with multiple rows of figure in the denominator.
– Kevin Powell
16 mins ago
Thanks! It seems that the more versatile
matrix
in tikzpicture
does not work with frac
. Although baseline
is one answer to this figure, it will become difficult to deal with multiple rows of figure in the denominator.– Kevin Powell
16 mins ago
Thanks! It seems that the more versatile
matrix
in tikzpicture
does not work with frac
. Although baseline
is one answer to this figure, it will become difficult to deal with multiple rows of figure in the denominator.– Kevin Powell
16 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
[
defM{tikz{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0)
( 0.5,0) to[bend left] ( 1.5,0) to[bend left] ( 0.5,0);
draw[dashed] (-0.5,0) -- (0.5,0);}
}
A = frac{tikz[baseline=1pt]{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0);}}
{tikz{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0)
( 0.5,0) to[bend left] ( 1.5,0) to[bend left] ( 0.5,0);
draw[dashed, shorten >=1mm, shorten <=1mm] (-0.5,0) -- (0.5,0);}
}
]
end{document}
How is that different from my answer except that you defineM
but do not use it? The only thing apart from the unused definition I can see is the use ofbaseline
, which is precisely what I am using.
– marmot
2 hours ago
@marmot the denominator is different. I think there's an error here, because the minus is missing.
– CarLaTeX
2 hours ago
2
I would create apic
for the shapes, and suggest to use dots instead of dashes, which could be confused with the minus (@marmot, too).
– CarLaTeX
1 hour ago
@CarLaTeX That's a brilliant idea!
– Kevin Powell
20 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
[
defM{tikz{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0)
( 0.5,0) to[bend left] ( 1.5,0) to[bend left] ( 0.5,0);
draw[dashed] (-0.5,0) -- (0.5,0);}
}
A = frac{tikz[baseline=1pt]{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0);}}
{tikz{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0)
( 0.5,0) to[bend left] ( 1.5,0) to[bend left] ( 0.5,0);
draw[dashed, shorten >=1mm, shorten <=1mm] (-0.5,0) -- (0.5,0);}
}
]
end{document}
How is that different from my answer except that you defineM
but do not use it? The only thing apart from the unused definition I can see is the use ofbaseline
, which is precisely what I am using.
– marmot
2 hours ago
@marmot the denominator is different. I think there's an error here, because the minus is missing.
– CarLaTeX
2 hours ago
2
I would create apic
for the shapes, and suggest to use dots instead of dashes, which could be confused with the minus (@marmot, too).
– CarLaTeX
1 hour ago
@CarLaTeX That's a brilliant idea!
– Kevin Powell
20 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
[
defM{tikz{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0)
( 0.5,0) to[bend left] ( 1.5,0) to[bend left] ( 0.5,0);
draw[dashed] (-0.5,0) -- (0.5,0);}
}
A = frac{tikz[baseline=1pt]{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0);}}
{tikz{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0)
( 0.5,0) to[bend left] ( 1.5,0) to[bend left] ( 0.5,0);
draw[dashed, shorten >=1mm, shorten <=1mm] (-0.5,0) -- (0.5,0);}
}
]
end{document}
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
[
defM{tikz{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0)
( 0.5,0) to[bend left] ( 1.5,0) to[bend left] ( 0.5,0);
draw[dashed] (-0.5,0) -- (0.5,0);}
}
A = frac{tikz[baseline=1pt]{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0);}}
{tikz{draw (-1.5,0) to[bend left] (-0.5,0) to[bend left] (-1.5,0)
( 0.5,0) to[bend left] ( 1.5,0) to[bend left] ( 0.5,0);
draw[dashed, shorten >=1mm, shorten <=1mm] (-0.5,0) -- (0.5,0);}
}
]
end{document}
edited 1 hour ago
answered 2 hours ago
Zarko
119k865155
119k865155
How is that different from my answer except that you defineM
but do not use it? The only thing apart from the unused definition I can see is the use ofbaseline
, which is precisely what I am using.
– marmot
2 hours ago
@marmot the denominator is different. I think there's an error here, because the minus is missing.
– CarLaTeX
2 hours ago
2
I would create apic
for the shapes, and suggest to use dots instead of dashes, which could be confused with the minus (@marmot, too).
– CarLaTeX
1 hour ago
@CarLaTeX That's a brilliant idea!
– Kevin Powell
20 mins ago
add a comment |
How is that different from my answer except that you defineM
but do not use it? The only thing apart from the unused definition I can see is the use ofbaseline
, which is precisely what I am using.
– marmot
2 hours ago
@marmot the denominator is different. I think there's an error here, because the minus is missing.
– CarLaTeX
2 hours ago
2
I would create apic
for the shapes, and suggest to use dots instead of dashes, which could be confused with the minus (@marmot, too).
– CarLaTeX
1 hour ago
@CarLaTeX That's a brilliant idea!
– Kevin Powell
20 mins ago
How is that different from my answer except that you define
M
but do not use it? The only thing apart from the unused definition I can see is the use of baseline
, which is precisely what I am using.– marmot
2 hours ago
How is that different from my answer except that you define
M
but do not use it? The only thing apart from the unused definition I can see is the use of baseline
, which is precisely what I am using.– marmot
2 hours ago
@marmot the denominator is different. I think there's an error here, because the minus is missing.
– CarLaTeX
2 hours ago
@marmot the denominator is different. I think there's an error here, because the minus is missing.
– CarLaTeX
2 hours ago
2
2
I would create a
pic
for the shapes, and suggest to use dots instead of dashes, which could be confused with the minus (@marmot, too).– CarLaTeX
1 hour ago
I would create a
pic
for the shapes, and suggest to use dots instead of dashes, which could be confused with the minus (@marmot, too).– CarLaTeX
1 hour ago
@CarLaTeX That's a brilliant idea!
– Kevin Powell
20 mins ago
@CarLaTeX That's a brilliant idea!
– Kevin Powell
20 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466042%2fhow-to-properly-align-tikz-pictures-in-latex-fraction-environment%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
please, extend your code fragment to complete small document ...
– Zarko
3 hours ago