How to migrate paper_trail's whodunnit column from string to integer?












0















In a legacy Rails app using paper_trail, the whodunnit column is set to string and instead of the default current_user.id, this column holds the user's email. This is achieved by overriding user_for_paper_trail in ApplicationController:



def user_for_paper_trail
current_user.email
end


Now I want to migrate to the default behavior of storing the id of the current user instead of the email.



So the approach I was thinking to take was something like this:




  • add a new integer column to the versions table, maybe named whodunnit_new;

  • remove user_for_paper_trail method in application controller and tell the models to write whodunnit info in whodunnit_new instead of whodunnit. This means, that for new versions, paper_trail is saving id in whodunnit_new and is not saving email in whodunnit;

  • backfill whodunnit_new for old records by finding the user by email and saving thier id in the new column;

  • drop the whodunnit column;

  • rename whodunnit_new to whodunnit and remove the setting in the models for using whodunnit_new.


The problem is - I couldn't find a setting, which can set the name of the whodunnit column, it seems to me, that it is hard-coded. I saw that there is an alias for the whodunnit method (called version_author).



I'm using Papertrail 10 and Rails 5.2.



So my question - what should be the proper way of doing the described migration.










share|improve this question





























    0















    In a legacy Rails app using paper_trail, the whodunnit column is set to string and instead of the default current_user.id, this column holds the user's email. This is achieved by overriding user_for_paper_trail in ApplicationController:



    def user_for_paper_trail
    current_user.email
    end


    Now I want to migrate to the default behavior of storing the id of the current user instead of the email.



    So the approach I was thinking to take was something like this:




    • add a new integer column to the versions table, maybe named whodunnit_new;

    • remove user_for_paper_trail method in application controller and tell the models to write whodunnit info in whodunnit_new instead of whodunnit. This means, that for new versions, paper_trail is saving id in whodunnit_new and is not saving email in whodunnit;

    • backfill whodunnit_new for old records by finding the user by email and saving thier id in the new column;

    • drop the whodunnit column;

    • rename whodunnit_new to whodunnit and remove the setting in the models for using whodunnit_new.


    The problem is - I couldn't find a setting, which can set the name of the whodunnit column, it seems to me, that it is hard-coded. I saw that there is an alias for the whodunnit method (called version_author).



    I'm using Papertrail 10 and Rails 5.2.



    So my question - what should be the proper way of doing the described migration.










    share|improve this question



























      0












      0








      0








      In a legacy Rails app using paper_trail, the whodunnit column is set to string and instead of the default current_user.id, this column holds the user's email. This is achieved by overriding user_for_paper_trail in ApplicationController:



      def user_for_paper_trail
      current_user.email
      end


      Now I want to migrate to the default behavior of storing the id of the current user instead of the email.



      So the approach I was thinking to take was something like this:




      • add a new integer column to the versions table, maybe named whodunnit_new;

      • remove user_for_paper_trail method in application controller and tell the models to write whodunnit info in whodunnit_new instead of whodunnit. This means, that for new versions, paper_trail is saving id in whodunnit_new and is not saving email in whodunnit;

      • backfill whodunnit_new for old records by finding the user by email and saving thier id in the new column;

      • drop the whodunnit column;

      • rename whodunnit_new to whodunnit and remove the setting in the models for using whodunnit_new.


      The problem is - I couldn't find a setting, which can set the name of the whodunnit column, it seems to me, that it is hard-coded. I saw that there is an alias for the whodunnit method (called version_author).



      I'm using Papertrail 10 and Rails 5.2.



      So my question - what should be the proper way of doing the described migration.










      share|improve this question
















      In a legacy Rails app using paper_trail, the whodunnit column is set to string and instead of the default current_user.id, this column holds the user's email. This is achieved by overriding user_for_paper_trail in ApplicationController:



      def user_for_paper_trail
      current_user.email
      end


      Now I want to migrate to the default behavior of storing the id of the current user instead of the email.



      So the approach I was thinking to take was something like this:




      • add a new integer column to the versions table, maybe named whodunnit_new;

      • remove user_for_paper_trail method in application controller and tell the models to write whodunnit info in whodunnit_new instead of whodunnit. This means, that for new versions, paper_trail is saving id in whodunnit_new and is not saving email in whodunnit;

      • backfill whodunnit_new for old records by finding the user by email and saving thier id in the new column;

      • drop the whodunnit column;

      • rename whodunnit_new to whodunnit and remove the setting in the models for using whodunnit_new.


      The problem is - I couldn't find a setting, which can set the name of the whodunnit column, it seems to me, that it is hard-coded. I saw that there is an alias for the whodunnit method (called version_author).



      I'm using Papertrail 10 and Rails 5.2.



      So my question - what should be the proper way of doing the described migration.







      ruby-on-rails paper-trail-gem






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 26 '18 at 13:44







      Alex Popov

















      asked Nov 26 '18 at 12:54









      Alex PopovAlex Popov

      7,646145285




      7,646145285
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1















          .. I couldn't find a setting, which can set the name of the whodunnit column, it seems to me, that it is hard-coded.




          Correct, the column must be named whodunnit. It is not configurable.



          Otherwise your migration sounds good. Use a transaction and you won't need to temporarily rename the column. (Unless you're using MySQL, which has "weak" transactions, ie. not protected against DDL)






          share|improve this answer
























            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53481579%2fhow-to-migrate-paper-trails-whodunnit-column-from-string-to-integer%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1















            .. I couldn't find a setting, which can set the name of the whodunnit column, it seems to me, that it is hard-coded.




            Correct, the column must be named whodunnit. It is not configurable.



            Otherwise your migration sounds good. Use a transaction and you won't need to temporarily rename the column. (Unless you're using MySQL, which has "weak" transactions, ie. not protected against DDL)






            share|improve this answer




























              1















              .. I couldn't find a setting, which can set the name of the whodunnit column, it seems to me, that it is hard-coded.




              Correct, the column must be named whodunnit. It is not configurable.



              Otherwise your migration sounds good. Use a transaction and you won't need to temporarily rename the column. (Unless you're using MySQL, which has "weak" transactions, ie. not protected against DDL)






              share|improve this answer


























                1












                1








                1








                .. I couldn't find a setting, which can set the name of the whodunnit column, it seems to me, that it is hard-coded.




                Correct, the column must be named whodunnit. It is not configurable.



                Otherwise your migration sounds good. Use a transaction and you won't need to temporarily rename the column. (Unless you're using MySQL, which has "weak" transactions, ie. not protected against DDL)






                share|improve this answer














                .. I couldn't find a setting, which can set the name of the whodunnit column, it seems to me, that it is hard-coded.




                Correct, the column must be named whodunnit. It is not configurable.



                Otherwise your migration sounds good. Use a transaction and you won't need to temporarily rename the column. (Unless you're using MySQL, which has "weak" transactions, ie. not protected against DDL)







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Dec 12 '18 at 18:25









                Jared BeckJared Beck

                10.4k35078




                10.4k35078
































                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53481579%2fhow-to-migrate-paper-trails-whodunnit-column-from-string-to-integer%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Ottavio Pratesi

                    Tricia Helfer

                    15 giugno